"Eventually, their backbones loosened...." Such statements are so loosely used to define and justify adaptation and, thus, evolution. For many years, humans swam using their hands and legs to propel themselves. Until one day, "The Man from Atlantis" introduced the dolphin-style swimming style. Man learned to loosen his backbones? Thinking in order to adapt is one thing; adapting without thinking is another. Expecting animals to grow limbs or sprout eyes is like trying to teach animals to talk.
@idontwantnoname fuck off, this is not a RELIGION video bitch. It is a science video so stop commenting on video about science and evolution stuff that ISNT ABOUT THAT SUBJECt. Just go watch some other videos with other purpose and start fucking it and commenting stuff that is totally useless douchebag. Think about i.
@KJRUSS0 "Why do I get a video advertizing Mormonism on a video having to deal with science?" Because this video isn't science. It's evolution and evolution is just another wacko religion like Mormonism.
Where exactly were creatures morphed or fossils flexed in this video? I see only actual fossils and images of what these creatures are thought to have looked like based on what can be deduced from the actual fossils.
@Quintinohthree Watch without sound, as the camera morphs one animal into another. Then watch with the sound on and hear the description of what is morphing ("... how hoofed carnivores evolved webbed feet [the flexing of the evidence--no web feet are in the fossils] and started to swim. Eventually their backbones loosened, their legs got smaller, and their tales turned into flumes.")
Perhaps you believe the "just so" story. Perhaps you have heard it told so often you don't question it.
@Quintinohthree Then consider that a population of dog-sized pakicetuses supposedly became the "largest animal on the earth at that time." It must have had problems with its pituitary! And the tail is supposedly turned into a flume. Any idea how many thousands of changes required for this feat? Any idea how vulnerable all the intermediate creatures would have been until chance got it right? Any idea how short a span of time allowed for chance to work?
@Quintinohthree The whale series is supposed to be the best, based on the similarity of their inner ear. The dinosaur to bird series has too many holes in it to be exhibited. The fish to amphibian series recently acquired its supposed missing link in Tiktaalik, though there is fossil evidence of quadrupeds preceding it by millions of years. (I personally don't interpret this as earlier existence, just earlier burial of trackways below the level of the fish.)
@MorganMarvinson "Then consider that a population of dog-sized pakicetuses supposedly became the "largest animal on the earth at that time.""
You seem to be ignoring the fact (or just ignorant of the fact) that there's approximately 15 million years between the appearance of pakicetus and the appearance of basilosaurus. Plenty of time for a slow, gradual change of the population to a size of 18m
@MorganMarvinson IF they were vulnerable, I could understand your point. As it is, the way natural selection works is that those best adapted to survive pass on their genes to the next generation. Obviously, those that are vulnerable are less likely to reproduce.
@419Films "IF they were vulnerable, I could understand your point." Then you must understand my point. How is a clubfooted land dweller NOT vulnerable? How is a animal with legs or partial flippers NOT vulnerable in the water? Yet, these are necessities in the gradualistic evolutionary scenario. To assume otherwise is to paint a totally Pollyannish and rosie scenario for the sake of the natural selection argument alone.
@MorganMarvinson This just shows me that a) you didn't read the rest of my post and b) have no clue as to how natural selection truly works. Whether through a lack of understanding or actual willful ignorance, I do not know.. Until you do understand it (or choose not to ignore the facts), no amount of scientific data will convince you of the validity of evolutionary theory.
@419Films "no amount of scientific data will convince you of the validity of evolutionary theory." We aren't talking about data, we are talking about the philosophy that interprets data and the inference of something that data cannot tell us. I understand how natural selection DOES work; what I don't accept is what is claimed for it that cannot be demonstrated.
"Philosophy that interprets data"? you mean the scientific method?
You clearly do not understand how Natural selection works. even if "vulnerable", you have deers walking around the woods and wolves hunting the,. Doesn't mean the wolves will clean the deers just for the sake of it. PLUS who knows, maybe the whale ancestors lived in protected regions.
BBC Should release all their programs on website like Youtube or on their site. Please be the first BBC. DO IT. I Love Your Programs and Documentaries.
"Basilosaurus" is mammalian, eh? Well...*if* the paleontologists have renamed Brontosaurus...then might this poor layman--moi--submit that what's good for the goose is good for the gander, so to speak. "Basilocetus", anyone?
Gravity is a theory, too. Theory in science terms means that you cannot run the experiment again to test for the same result. It is not about observation. Everything points to evolution from embryo development to how our organs work to genetics for all species and in anatomy in general. Humans "evolved" poodles through selection. Again, all evidence in life- and earth-science point to evolution and natural selection as the only causitive agent for how all life is today.
Check it out. Whales and othe marine cetaceans evolved somewhere around Pakistan when it, too, was part of a long waterway that ran all the way to Africa (before India and the Middle East moved north). Nothing like shallow warm water to get the evolution going.
Sadly, many Americans are blinded by a nearly medieval sense of religion and simply refuse to face the facts. Religion and being God]s favoured no ation are deeply integrated into American thinking. Admit to evolution as fact and you remove the special posiion of Americas and the United States. It is a form of collective insanity.
@SolofTarsus5 "Sadly," many evolutionists have not stopped to calculate the changes and time required for unguided copy errors to produce any useful adaptation nor how all the malformed intermediate animals could possibly have had an advantage moving from land to sea. It's a form of group think that doesn't question the improbable mythology.
one needs only to look around to see adaptation (evolution) exists.Why are we covered with hair so thin it's useless....cause we were furry.Once we started wearing animal skins,the hair started to go...soon it will be gone.We have canine inscisors,cause we were predators.How can one disregard the MOUNTAIN of supporting evidence in favor of adam and eve?
@noblepuker I agree with you on most of what you said, but I doubt our hair will go anytime soon. It has no positive or negative effect on us therefor natural selection cannot modify the gene controlling it.
@idontwantnoname You're an idiot. Do you really think that you know more than the millions of scientists on the planet who have researched evolution for over 100 years? Fuck off.
@idontwantnoname You are a fucking moron. What about evolution isn't true? Can you provide any evidence that would refute ANYTHING that evolution says? Of course you can't, that's why you don't have a Nobel Prize. Nice spelling and grammar as well, Mr.'Intelligence'.
there is only one moron here and that is you, obviously english isnt my first language. i can speak multiple languages pal, and you?? let me say, u only speak garbage and hatred!! well can you see who is the moron? lol and only narrow minded morons like you think that wotever you believe and say is true!! , educate yourself and widen your narrow horizon. wot i am saying is because you dont wanna believie in a religion or wotever shouldnt make you believe fiction either!
well again, you are just twisting it, for the record I AM NOT RELIGIOUS!
let me put it straight, i understand wot scientists are trying to do. they just want to understand and explain the unknown to all and thats wot the science is about. providing incomplete and incorrect information is just as wrong as a religion. science is assuming things and telling people as facts! far from it.
just an example: calling an unknown energy dark energy is not science!!
@idontwantnoname Yes but I am agreeing with the scientists, they seem pretty smart don't you think? They're also reliable, and best of all I can SEE them.
@idontwantnoname It is not theory. The evidence is beyond overwhelming and the fact is that living things evolved and contiue to evolve. To ingore all the evidence supporting that fact is intellectually bizzare.
@idontwantnoname The evidence is overwhelming and global. It is reflected in genetics, body structures, cellular structures, immune systems, the entire geologic record, the chemistry of the planet, paleomagnetism, embryo development, environmental adaptations to disasters, and watching it happen in daily life in the creation of new breeds of plants and animals. If you choose to miss all this and all the other evidence, then that is your choice.
@SolofTarsus5 But hey, it's still a theory since nobody have witnessed it. We're pretty sure, since we have all of this evidence and no other logical explanations, that evolution took place, but we still can't be sure...
@TheKiwipie evolution is actualy proved to be true and is proven mathematicaly. gravity has not be proven mathematicaly bechose it has many proplems. but evolution is so well proven that we have law of evolution. allso there is no doupt that humans are monkey and that whales evolve from land animals. so if evolution whuld not be true, there whuld be some other procces that does exactly the same thing.
@gooddarkjedi Yes, yes, i know, I'm an evolutionist too. But we can never ever be sure. Just very close to it. Hey, we don't even now that we have arms, or that we are humans. Maybe we are just a couple of brains imagining all of this.
@idontwantnoname Seriously, science is about "providing incomplete and incorrect information [that] is just as wrong as a religion" ?
If you're not trolling, which I highly suspect you are, I suggest that you educate yourself on the scientific method, because now you just look like an ignorant fool.
Calling a new type of energy "dark energy" is just like calling a new-found element "Francium". Scientists give it a name just so they can communicate information easily, the name has no meaning.
listen pal, dark energy is not a new found element!! get it? and its not about the name or wot its called! i believe in science and I love it in fact but wot i am against is naming something dark energy because the galaxies are moving away from each other is fiction!!! there is absolute no evidence of it!! its even questionable that dark energy even exists!! scientists are just assuming that there is some sort of dark energy that moves galaxies away from each other!
@idontwantnoname First of all, dark energy is the most accepted theory amongst scientists (which are all incredibly more qualified than you on the subject) to explain why the universe appears to be expanding at an accelerating rate.
And yes, galaxies are moving away from each other that's just a fact. All you have to do to see if a galaxy is moving away from us is to measure the redshift of light emitted by said galaxy.
Educate yourself on the subject, you are incredibly ignorant.
most acccepted theory, u mean assumption!! even its accepted by science, the dark energy is still an unknown, and even science cant explain it! for example; water is a fact, earth is a fact, air is a fact because we know they exist and we need them to survive but dark energy's existence is questionable. i know the science always tend to accept the most understandable theory but at times scientists can be wrong too, as einstein thought the universe was static!!
@idontwantnoname If dark energy's non-existence is so obvious and you can explain it why don't you write a paper on it or something ? You'd get fame amongst the scientific community, mabye even a Nobel prize !
Of course this question is rhetorical, we both know that you cannot disprove the theory of dark matter and that any argument you would advance on the subject would be utterly destroyed by scientists who actually support the theory.
here is a great video v=w_ULpj-upJY that explains the dark matter and the dark energy, by the genius NEIL TYSON, i hope it helps you understand things and facts slightly better!!
OMG in the part where they used CGI to turn the skeleton into the actual animal, I was like OMG I remember that from the scene where they have a fight and there's a 'bloodbath' xD
@riverlifeva Religious people are missing something. Ephesians 4:15 says "Speaking the truth in love we are to grow up in EVERY WAY into the Head, into Christ." Obviously would include evolution too. Time-space circles due to General Relativity & Ecclesiastes 1:9 This explains how John 15:1-2 is possible, how God can be both Vine & Vine-dresser who guides & prunes His own growth! Ephesians 4:10 says Christ ascends to fill all things. Heaven BTW is only a 1500 mile long cube! Rev chaps 21-22.
Notice the lack of questioning that evolution actually happens, what age is America pretending to live in? Do Americans actually think this is a controversial issue?
@ihaterobbie123 *some americans. the ones that ruin it for the rest of us. Always fun to mess with my extremely orthodox mother by telling her what it's like to work with a human head in anatomy class. So don't give in to ethnocentrism, we're not all stuck in the 19th century ;)
@ihaterobbie123 Even something as set as physics, specifically gravity, is constantly questioned and reinterpreted. In Science, we should find it strange that there is almost no questioning of evolution by the scientific community. Especially, since Evolution has become so involved in Politics. Politics corrupts science (take for example global warming which is accepted by almost no one now a days)
@ihaterobbie123 Religiosity here in America is dangerous and as more people grasp the concepts of science and actual history, the gap between rational people and religious fundamentalists is growing larger and larger. Christianity is on its last stand, it's using extremely abusive cult tactics to preserve it's following and is getting increasingly violent in the face of reality.
I'm a proud American Atheist, and this country is rapidly becoming more and more secular, reason will prevail. :)
First of all, I'm very conservative and believe in capitalism, second of all, I'm not queer. Fuck you! Your an ignorant piece of shit that mindlessly believes any bullshit someone spews out if it helps you hold on to your primitive beliefs.
@KJRUSS0 HAR HAR HAR upset are we? I doubt the you can define conservative OR liberal OR the difference between the two. You can't be conservative and still be an atheist. My primitive beliefs? hahahaha you don't even know what my beliefs are ya imbecile.
@KJRUSS0 "I'm a proud American Atheist, and this country is rapidly becoming more and more secular, reason will prevail." Yes, the same thing happened in Russia. They killed all the Christians they could find and made it into an atheist country. 70 years later it all fell apart because atheism has never been any kind of basis for anything useful. Now the Russian govt is building churches.
@MaximusArurealius Russians killed out of communism and only communism, learn something about history. Stalin originally studied to become a priest before deciding that he rather do politics. During his early years he established and promoted the churches in Russia. He started his term strongly Christian then turn secular later on, but he was killing people the entire time he had power. He became increasingly paranoid and thought the churches turned against him, so he killed the clergy.
@KJRUSS0 BTW if you're a queer, when America finally goes down you will have to find a Christian country to hide out in. The atheists don't tolerate homosexuals.
@MaximusArurealius What the fuck are you talking about? Atheists don't tolerate homosexuals...homosexuals should seek protection from Christians? What fucking planet do you live on? Atheists are the most pro-homosexual equality group of people in America, mostly because religion doesn't tell us that it's wrong, rather we listen to science that tells us it's natural. Christians on the other hand...well just look at Uganda, Christians would kill homosexuals off if given the power to.
@robbie, you dummass. Here you are on a video trying to prove that wolves turned into whales and you want us to accept it as fact? HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR You're dumber than a bucket of wet hammers.
emagine that..Litter the floor in Egypt..They have found whale fossils as high as the andes along with Huge Clams 6feet round..Wow i wonder if they walked up there to try and fake the earth was flooded..And this guy here try's to throw off people of the fact sound more like what the Bible says..so to throw that off and try to make it sound like an animal evolution ..and people will be dumb enough to buy it..Those who are ignorant of course..Thing is they have never found anything to know
@GateMessenger there are toothed whales such as the sperm whale but most whales are balleen whales which means they have plates for filtering plankton and other minute organisms through
they just discovered a huge whale skeleton..in peru.. like 12 million years old..teeth on bottom and top...really big teeth!..check out on bbc website! bbc dot uk dot co
@Neanerthebeaner: I looked it up; it's at newsDOT bbcDOT coDOT uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10461066.stm. At 12 million years it is much younger than anything on the Walking with Beasts show (@ 50-35 ma). The picture there is dramatic but very poor, as the prey appears to be a modern blue whale, which is actually twice the length of the Leviathan melvillei, itself comparable to a modern sperm whale or the Basilosaurus in this video. There's also a wiki article; see Leviathan melvilleii.
if christianity died, which it basically already is dead seeing that it once ruled europe politically, then the birth rate would further plummet to almost nothing, the birth rate for whites is at death bed levels across the world for 2 reasons 1) decline in christianity 2) the pill/birth control 3) women en masse in the workforce instead of having kids.... also theres a connection between country/religion/privateproperty which would be dissolved, and ISRAEL would make YOU A SLAVE
and im saying israel/zionism arent going anywhere...and Foxnews is owned by jews it should be called the israeli war channel posing as "ring wing christians" getting christians to fight israels muslim enemies for them. Jews arent dumb, they own the media, and they know that if you rid of christianity, the birth rate plummets and whites die out, being replaced with 3rd worlders who will bring the west to the level of south africa or any other nonwhite 3rd world countries. israel will conquer you
youre not very smart huh? jews took control control of the central banks and thus the govts thru USURY and bought up the media and funded WW1 to destroy the remaining Christian monarchies and replace them with socialist democracies/communism which the banks control. they then financed hitler to force jews to palestine after the balfour declaration gave them the holy land after WW1 by britain. the israeli mossad did 911 just like USS liberty 1967 as false flags for the usa to fight muslim nations
@sabertooth1980 you just typed so youre full of shit. iran isnt a threat to anyone but israel, and the jewish media and the zionist occupied us govt and the UN which the jewish bankers created are strangling iran and want war. the only reason the ZOG us govt and media targets nkorea is because they have nuclear weapons and have done business with the muslim nations, and israels scared to death because nkorea voted in the UN that zionism is racism, meaning nkorea knows israel wants world control
@idideroo Time for your medication Idideroo. You say the craziest things. Next thing you know you'll be denouncing gravity as some sort of jewish conspiracy to steal your lucky charms.
@sabertooth1980 if there is one thing that is wrong or inaccurate in what i said, id like to hear it, because i can tell you that everything was 100% fact.... ur complete ignorance left u dumbfounded and that amuses me
@idideroo What's that I hear? Is that you telling me to prove you wrong?
Alright, seeing that we are going on insane tin foilhat wearing silly walks. It is 100% fact that the squirrels of the world of conspiring with the retoids in order to make it so that I don't have any socks.
If there isn't one thing that is wrong or inaccurate in what I have said, I'd like to hear it.
@sabertooth1980 ok then, i see what ur saying. the former director of studies at the US Army war college, Dr. Alan Sabrosky, who is part jewish, came out and said the israeli mossad did 911 and he said most of the US military is aware because they did the same thing in 1967 to the USS Liberty (which of course you never heard of) and he said the obvious, its covered up because the press is 96% jewish owned. listen to him on youtube hes made many interviews, US Army director of studies
@sabertooth1980 you never even heard of the uss liberty, i cant give u a 200 year history lesson this way.... and his interviews state facts, hear from a director of the us army to open ur mind just slightly at least if u can just do that much..... once you do that a FACT based full blown documentary on israel 911 involvement is online made by historians and veterans, its called "911 missing links" its about 12 parts but its the best ive seen u wont have questions after watching it was israel
@idideroo See, there are little words that are hot words that really discredit your statements.
One. "Can't give you evidence." If I told you "I can't give you evidence" for the simplest of things let's say I tell you that I own a cat and you want evidence. What reason would you have for believing that I have a cat?
Next. "Open ur mind". I have an open mind. Give me evidence and I can change my position. No evidence. No change.
@sabertooth1980 watch alan sabrosky, he gave 3 interviews, pick one.... but since you literally know NOTHING on this subject at all, u might not understand him, so watch 911 missing links the whole thing, it has all the facts of 911 and israel, i cant give u this much info like this if u have NO BACKGROUND knowledge, watch it then come see me, until then dont fucking respond with more nonsense. dipshit
@sabertooth1980 ........ and btw correlation vs causation has nothing to do with this. watch and hear the many many facts, especially in 911 Missing Links and they put it on youtube
Why do creationists fight against evolution so much? Just imagine primitive man & if we are all made in the image of god, god looks like an ape? Hairy, dirty, smelly, unwashed, yellow broken teeth, horrible hair.... that is supposed to represent God? No wonder time stops going backward about 5,000 years ago to these people.
Next time u take a look at the image of an Neanderthal man in a museum, i am sure u will pay him a bit more respect - Behold God in all his glory!
Those of us who understand the factuality of evolution, have no need of showing these idiots how, why or that it occurred....It's a matter of natural selection...There children will, or will not be taught the way the world actually works...If they are taught that Jesus will come back from heaven to save them/burn us, then they are less likely to be successful, therefor giving our children an evolutionary advantage..
and we should all keep in mind that holy books cannot be interpreted as accurate, nor a testimony of holyness, factually they're a selection of multiple ancient texts from multiple religious and philosophical sources, cloned, adapted, passed through. We should also keep in mind that those same rligious writings reflect absolute dominance of societies and segregation of social classes. They're sociological philosophical and historical treasures, although religious people don't see it that way.
look there is no reason for anyone to start screaming demons cause they don't believe in God..just state your proof and move on in peace.Why fight like the devil against the word of God you do not believe in ?
@evillutionskate its in the mountains of ararat and is a national monument for all to see that have been allowed to know about it..Look,i will make a video just for you and others like you..I will show you all the proof i have talked mentioned..and after you refuse to believe what you can plainly see as fact wich is called" willingly ignorant" then atleast you can call people names knowing you are very wrong and living the words of lie's and only repeating what you have been told by God hater's
i dont like to say this but he's right... there WERE signs of an arc found... if it had the same story like in bible is another question even though i strongly doubt it
signs of an Ark ?? watch my vidoes on the ark..they did not only find the ark,but Noahs village,Whats left of his home and the Anchors from the ark scatterd along the grounds..In turkey Noahs Ark is a National monument..why are we not being told this ??? because it would prove evolution a joke and end all their Government Grants and funding not to mention they would look stupid having to rewrite history..cause Noah is one step from Believing that God exist.All thier lies would tumble down.Peace
please bro... just because they found an ancient village and a ship doesnt mean all evolution is crap... besides noahs story has absolutely nothing to do with evolution and darwinism, thats more the sevendays thing
how funny..thats is only a very small portion of what we know..Evolution is a joke..Strange how we don't trust government on almost nothing..But what the teach in public schools if it fits you way of thinking ,then it must be true huh ?? lol..hey you just keep lapping up that Gov. dogfood bro..But there is so many things and proof of what i say..you would have to be willingly ignorant to still believe in evolution and the world being a million years old lol..its not even close to that.Peace
same goes for you ;) who wrote the bible? where except of humans do you find evidence that what stands in the bible is true? you see? humans invented "god" as well as the bible. we have plenty of evidence for evolution and dont even have to obtain it originally like the bible
You should try teaching yourself everything the Gov. kept from you in schools..You ar missing out on the truth.But your choice..i would not wait to long to learn who Jesus is..cause one second after you die...its to late.Peace
i know who jesus is dude ...and its not that i dont believe in him... just in an different way we in germany use the bible to INTERPRET things to modern life... not everything is meant exactly as it stands in bible
i just dont understand why you are so stubborn to not accepting evolution i mean evidence is everywhere and you betrayed your god and jesus multiple times by killing people for oil in iraq or at least voting the responsible man 2 friggin times
lol... i love people who say god is a fairytale then i see this thing.... wolves decided to swim more and they turned into many diff species and dinosaurs and then whales? wtf. im pretty sure use vs disuse was even discredited by darwin as false. if evolution exists its in the dna, so this is bullshit, but honestly dna is set in stone, its not gonna change, it cant. not into different species
@Hammerfest08 you so dont have a clue of anything... never sat in a biology class but talking like a wannabe prof.. if you really want to negate something then first inform correctly about it, read about selection, mutation and stuff.
i love people who believe that "god" comes to earth, snips with the finger and thats when the whale was born.
@donttttt i have, and there is no evidence a species can turn into another species. in fact we know it cant happen. DNA is set in stone, we inherit genes from both parents, both the same species, we inherit different traits from both, but its the same species. DNA cannot change into another species when both parents combine their DNA. its impossible. nevermind "proof" of evolution, there proof to the contrary
@Hammerfest08 so if this is all nonsense, what reason to live had archaeopteryx (he couldnt even fly), ambulocetus and so on? why were they undeniable bindings for two different types? Why should your "god" create such things if he could create whales or birds right away?
I told you to look up mutation, selection, genpool and so on. YOU just gave proof that you have no clue what youre talking about. whats the 'proof' of your theory anyway? the bible?^^
@donttttt why does a platypus exist? huh? even evolutionists admit platypus is NOT a transitional species. why does a penguin have wings? thats proof? they need them for balance and to swim. why do we have pinky toes? balance. appendix? helps digestion. asking why a species exists the way it does proves nothing. again, how can DNA change into another species? a human is gonna turn into something else? no sorry
@Hammerfest08 If you'd just look up mutation, selection, genpool, gendrift and the other definitions of evolution you would at least understand a bit what an evolutionist is talking about. this will also answer your question. i know myself its very hard to understand and to imagine, but the proof is all around us. without evolution or "turning into another species" we wouldnt have the amount of animals on our planet we'd have without it. so i guess you also dont think we're related to apes...?
@donttttt youre last half of that is literally all the evidence there is. why do we look like animals and why so many? evolutionists main evidence is this HAS to be true. ive taken bio courses/books, genetics shows nothing to suggest species change into another. a gene mutation/depletion here or there cant make that big a change, picture a human now turning into a baboon, turning into a bear. thats the same logic behind these graphics, wolf, to crocadile mammal, to whale. impossible
@Hammerfest08 yeah that probably will never happen xD human bear come on^^ but we already turned from apes to humans... also little lizards turned to big dinosaurs so it already happened a lot. the changing a mammal was going through when it turned to a whale was big because of specializing to life in water. if polar bears wont die out in the next 50 years they would have probably also changed in the next 5 million years. beside.. may I ask what you believe in? are you religious or creationist?
@donttttt use vs disuse is known to be wrong. that theory is discredited even by darwin, that a giraffes long neck came from reaching leaves, or a human would get long arms stretching for a basketball hoop. a wolf cant turn into a whale from swimming more. that is the most far fetched myth. a human turning into a bear would be as dramatic as that happening. u really believe thats possible. us turning into a bear-like thing? cause thats just on par with wolf to whale
@Hammerfest08 yeah i believe in that theory. I know that LAMARCKs theory is wrong and darwins theory of selection and mutation is proven to be at least the more obvious. selection and so on is not what lamarck was up to. again you show your unknowing of science. i never spoke of lamarcks theory use vs disuse so why do you bring it up? of course darwin was against it and so am i. i'm still amused you think its more possible when god comes out and BAZOOM there are all animals.
@donttttt "because of specializing to life in water" thats ur quote, taking that to mean use vs disuse (yes its lamarck im surprised u heard) theres no way DNA can tell if wolves decided to swim more or not. natural selection cant suddenly realize we need to change from feet to fins. that would be like humans who are pro swimmers marrying only other swimmers to make a living, and eventually they start growing fins over many years. its a nice theory, i agree, but very farfetched
also, to answer ur last sentence "you think its more possible when god comes out and BAZOOM there are all the animals" hahaha literally scientists theory is that suddenly out of nowhere matter appeared (even tho science says matter cant be created lol) and then BAZOOM a big bam creates everything and lightning hits mud and BAZOOM a cell and DNA is randomly made which morphs into you LOL."you think its more possible god comes" that sums up evolution, its the only possible "scientific" scenario
@Hammerfest08 specializing in water is not necessarily realted to use vs disuse. since you know so much about biology you surely can tell me how darwin would describe the process. and i have to agree with you. of course its a quest we have to answer how matter could appear out of nowhere and you know what? i'm sure there is some "conciousness" behind this. not necessarily an old omnipresent HUMAN being called "god" but yeah something. you think i dont ask anything? you wrong.
those bones weren't made for walkin
yaplesyrup 1 week ago
"Eventually, their backbones loosened...." Such statements are so loosely used to define and justify adaptation and, thus, evolution. For many years, humans swam using their hands and legs to propel themselves. Until one day, "The Man from Atlantis" introduced the dolphin-style swimming style. Man learned to loosen his backbones? Thinking in order to adapt is one thing; adapting without thinking is another. Expecting animals to grow limbs or sprout eyes is like trying to teach animals to talk.
manariwa 1 week ago
wow, people really cant troll to save their lives.
x0xDarthWyylokx0x 2 weeks ago
"insert religion comment here"
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
Blame it all on Jesus.
dirtydonki 3 months ago
what a load of shite
46danz 4 months ago
i think it is obvious that these whales were intelligently designed
topperheartramada 4 months ago
@idontwantnoname fuck off, this is not a RELIGION video bitch. It is a science video so stop commenting on video about science and evolution stuff that ISNT ABOUT THAT SUBJECt. Just go watch some other videos with other purpose and start fucking it and commenting stuff that is totally useless douchebag. Think about i.
yes4roblox 6 months ago
Great debates going on here. Try not to get too offended by each other folks
OCDHeifer 6 months ago
Anyone doubting that evolution is all about religion just check the comments below to cast all doubt away.
MaximusArurealius 6 months ago
watch the arrivals!
pinball281 6 months ago
@darthbinks99 annoying creationists!
riverlifeva 7 months ago
Why do I get a video advertizing Mormonism on a video having to deal with science?
KJRUSS0 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KJRUSS0 "Why do I get a video advertizing Mormonism on a video having to deal with science?" Because this video isn't science. It's evolution and evolution is just another wacko religion like Mormonism.
MaximusArurealius 6 months ago
As they say: "Seeing is believing." Shall we try some other morphing of creatures (and flexing of the fossil evidence) to prove evolution?
MorganMarvinson 7 months ago
@MorganMarvinson
Where exactly were creatures morphed or fossils flexed in this video? I see only actual fossils and images of what these creatures are thought to have looked like based on what can be deduced from the actual fossils.
Quintinohthree 7 months ago
@Quintinohthree Watch without sound, as the camera morphs one animal into another. Then watch with the sound on and hear the description of what is morphing ("... how hoofed carnivores evolved webbed feet [the flexing of the evidence--no web feet are in the fossils] and started to swim. Eventually their backbones loosened, their legs got smaller, and their tales turned into flumes.")
Perhaps you believe the "just so" story. Perhaps you have heard it told so often you don't question it.
MorganMarvinson 7 months ago
@Quintinohthree Then consider that a population of dog-sized pakicetuses supposedly became the "largest animal on the earth at that time." It must have had problems with its pituitary! And the tail is supposedly turned into a flume. Any idea how many thousands of changes required for this feat? Any idea how vulnerable all the intermediate creatures would have been until chance got it right? Any idea how short a span of time allowed for chance to work?
MorganMarvinson 7 months ago
@MorganMarvinson
You don't happen to know of the existence of many more intermediate fossils do you?
Quintinohthree 7 months ago
@Quintinohthree The whale series is supposed to be the best, based on the similarity of their inner ear. The dinosaur to bird series has too many holes in it to be exhibited. The fish to amphibian series recently acquired its supposed missing link in Tiktaalik, though there is fossil evidence of quadrupeds preceding it by millions of years. (I personally don't interpret this as earlier existence, just earlier burial of trackways below the level of the fish.)
MorganMarvinson 7 months ago
@MorganMarvinson "Then consider that a population of dog-sized pakicetuses supposedly became the "largest animal on the earth at that time.""
You seem to be ignoring the fact (or just ignorant of the fact) that there's approximately 15 million years between the appearance of pakicetus and the appearance of basilosaurus. Plenty of time for a slow, gradual change of the population to a size of 18m
419Films 3 months ago
@419Films "15 million years" A much longer time to be vulnerable, which was my point.
MorganMarvinson 3 months ago
@MorganMarvinson IF they were vulnerable, I could understand your point. As it is, the way natural selection works is that those best adapted to survive pass on their genes to the next generation. Obviously, those that are vulnerable are less likely to reproduce.
419Films 3 months ago
Comment removed
MorganMarvinson 3 months ago
@419Films "IF they were vulnerable, I could understand your point." Then you must understand my point. How is a clubfooted land dweller NOT vulnerable? How is a animal with legs or partial flippers NOT vulnerable in the water? Yet, these are necessities in the gradualistic evolutionary scenario. To assume otherwise is to paint a totally Pollyannish and rosie scenario for the sake of the natural selection argument alone.
MorganMarvinson 3 months ago
@MorganMarvinson This just shows me that a) you didn't read the rest of my post and b) have no clue as to how natural selection truly works. Whether through a lack of understanding or actual willful ignorance, I do not know.. Until you do understand it (or choose not to ignore the facts), no amount of scientific data will convince you of the validity of evolutionary theory.
419Films 3 months ago
@419Films "no amount of scientific data will convince you of the validity of evolutionary theory." We aren't talking about data, we are talking about the philosophy that interprets data and the inference of something that data cannot tell us. I understand how natural selection DOES work; what I don't accept is what is claimed for it that cannot be demonstrated.
MorganMarvinson 3 months ago
@MorganMarvinson
"Philosophy that interprets data"? you mean the scientific method?
You clearly do not understand how Natural selection works. even if "vulnerable", you have deers walking around the woods and wolves hunting the,. Doesn't mean the wolves will clean the deers just for the sake of it. PLUS who knows, maybe the whale ancestors lived in protected regions.
Your denial doesn't help your case.
transtlantic 1 month ago
BBC Should release all their programs on website like Youtube or on their site. Please be the first BBC. DO IT. I Love Your Programs and Documentaries.
4xxxLoneWolfxxx4 8 months ago
"Basilosaurus" is mammalian, eh? Well...*if* the paleontologists have renamed Brontosaurus...then might this poor layman--moi--submit that what's good for the goose is good for the gander, so to speak. "Basilocetus", anyone?
wrybreadspread 8 months ago
@wrybreadspread i like it!
uknowispeaksense 8 months ago
Gravity is a theory, too. Theory in science terms means that you cannot run the experiment again to test for the same result. It is not about observation. Everything points to evolution from embryo development to how our organs work to genetics for all species and in anatomy in general. Humans "evolved" poodles through selection. Again, all evidence in life- and earth-science point to evolution and natural selection as the only causitive agent for how all life is today.
SolofTarsus5 8 months ago
Check it out. Whales and othe marine cetaceans evolved somewhere around Pakistan when it, too, was part of a long waterway that ran all the way to Africa (before India and the Middle East moved north). Nothing like shallow warm water to get the evolution going.
SolofTarsus5 9 months ago
Sadly, many Americans are blinded by a nearly medieval sense of religion and simply refuse to face the facts. Religion and being God]s favoured no ation are deeply integrated into American thinking. Admit to evolution as fact and you remove the special posiion of Americas and the United States. It is a form of collective insanity.
SolofTarsus5 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SolofTarsus5 you will see
urbman29 9 months ago
@SolofTarsus5 "Sadly," many evolutionists have not stopped to calculate the changes and time required for unguided copy errors to produce any useful adaptation nor how all the malformed intermediate animals could possibly have had an advantage moving from land to sea. It's a form of group think that doesn't question the improbable mythology.
MorganMarvinson 7 months ago
why the fossils found on the egypt sand? O_O? looks cool
danxiie 9 months ago
@danxiie Because when life goes on, lands move because of tectonic plates, so equators move and so on...
DarknesSoldier 9 months ago
@danxiie Because that sand was once under 50 m of sea.
SolofTarsus5 9 months ago
@SolofTarsus5 thanks ^_^
danxiie 9 months ago
Nobody gives a fuck about your religons watch the video a shut your fucking mouth
XjerichoX12 9 months ago
one needs only to look around to see adaptation (evolution) exists.Why are we covered with hair so thin it's useless....cause we were furry.Once we started wearing animal skins,the hair started to go...soon it will be gone.We have canine inscisors,cause we were predators.How can one disregard the MOUNTAIN of supporting evidence in favor of adam and eve?
noblepuker 10 months ago
@noblepuker I agree with you on most of what you said, but I doubt our hair will go anytime soon. It has no positive or negative effect on us therefor natural selection cannot modify the gene controlling it.
painkillerzman 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@painkillerzman "It has no positive or negative effect on us therefor natural selection cannot modify the gene controlling it."...good point.
noblepuker 10 months ago
wot a load of rubbish!!
understand people being athiest but believing evalotion is just BULLSHIT!!
there is no such thing, and there is absolutely no evidence of transition between species. this is all FICTION.
idontwantnoname 10 months ago
@idontwantnoname You're an idiot. Do you really think that you know more than the millions of scientists on the planet who have researched evolution for over 100 years? Fuck off.
HoLOLcaust 10 months ago
@HoLOLcaust
lol, ok genius. lmao
it is obvious you transtioned from a fish, you fish brain. :)
nothing said by scientiest about evolution is facts, its all a theory.
get your facts right. well you dont have any, you are nothing but a fish brain with no intelligent!!
gtf out of the way of people with brains and intelligence to discuss matters that you obviously wont understand.
idontwantnoname 10 months ago
@idontwantnoname You are a fucking moron. What about evolution isn't true? Can you provide any evidence that would refute ANYTHING that evolution says? Of course you can't, that's why you don't have a Nobel Prize. Nice spelling and grammar as well, Mr.'Intelligence'.
HoLOLcaust 10 months ago
@HoLOLcaust
there is only one moron here and that is you, obviously english isnt my first language. i can speak multiple languages pal, and you?? let me say, u only speak garbage and hatred!! well can you see who is the moron? lol and only narrow minded morons like you think that wotever you believe and say is true!! , educate yourself and widen your narrow horizon. wot i am saying is because you dont wanna believie in a religion or wotever shouldnt make you believe fiction either!
idontwantnoname 10 months ago
@idontwantnoname Religion is fiction you brainwashed fool.
HoLOLcaust 10 months ago
@HoLOLcaust
well again, you are just twisting it, for the record I AM NOT RELIGIOUS!
let me put it straight, i understand wot scientists are trying to do. they just want to understand and explain the unknown to all and thats wot the science is about. providing incomplete and incorrect information is just as wrong as a religion. science is assuming things and telling people as facts! far from it.
just an example: calling an unknown energy dark energy is not science!!
idontwantnoname 10 months ago
@idontwantnoname So you're smarter than say Stephen Hawking? Or Richard Dawkins? You know something that they don't?
HoLOLcaust 10 months ago
@HoLOLcaust
well, i am smarter than you'll ever be! thats for sure. :)
idontwantnoname 10 months ago
@idontwantnoname Yes but I am agreeing with the scientists, they seem pretty smart don't you think? They're also reliable, and best of all I can SEE them.
HoLOLcaust 10 months ago
@idontwantnoname It is not theory. The evidence is beyond overwhelming and the fact is that living things evolved and contiue to evolve. To ingore all the evidence supporting that fact is intellectually bizzare.
SolofTarsus5 9 months ago
@SolofTarsus5
bizzare from your perspective! lack of evidence from mine. :)
idontwantnoname 9 months ago
@idontwantnoname The evidence is overwhelming and global. It is reflected in genetics, body structures, cellular structures, immune systems, the entire geologic record, the chemistry of the planet, paleomagnetism, embryo development, environmental adaptations to disasters, and watching it happen in daily life in the creation of new breeds of plants and animals. If you choose to miss all this and all the other evidence, then that is your choice.
SolofTarsus5 9 months ago
@SolofTarsus5 But hey, it's still a theory since nobody have witnessed it. We're pretty sure, since we have all of this evidence and no other logical explanations, that evolution took place, but we still can't be sure...
TheKiwipie 8 months ago
@TheKiwipie evolution is actualy proved to be true and is proven mathematicaly. gravity has not be proven mathematicaly bechose it has many proplems. but evolution is so well proven that we have law of evolution. allso there is no doupt that humans are monkey and that whales evolve from land animals. so if evolution whuld not be true, there whuld be some other procces that does exactly the same thing.
gooddarkjedi 8 months ago
@gooddarkjedi Yes, yes, i know, I'm an evolutionist too. But we can never ever be sure. Just very close to it. Hey, we don't even now that we have arms, or that we are humans. Maybe we are just a couple of brains imagining all of this.
TheKiwipie 8 months ago
@idontwantnoname Obvious troll is obvious.
painkillerzman 10 months ago
@painkillerzman
you are just as narrow minded as those religious idiots!!
everyone is allowed their opinion! if you dont have an opinion on the subject i suggest you go and play with your toys!
idontwantnoname 10 months ago
@idontwantnoname Seriously, science is about "providing incomplete and incorrect information [that] is just as wrong as a religion" ?
If you're not trolling, which I highly suspect you are, I suggest that you educate yourself on the scientific method, because now you just look like an ignorant fool.
Calling a new type of energy "dark energy" is just like calling a new-found element "Francium". Scientists give it a name just so they can communicate information easily, the name has no meaning.
painkillerzman 10 months ago
Comment removed
idontwantnoname 10 months ago
@painkillerzman
listen pal, dark energy is not a new found element!! get it? and its not about the name or wot its called! i believe in science and I love it in fact but wot i am against is naming something dark energy because the galaxies are moving away from each other is fiction!!! there is absolute no evidence of it!! its even questionable that dark energy even exists!! scientists are just assuming that there is some sort of dark energy that moves galaxies away from each other!
idontwantnoname 10 months ago
@idontwantnoname First of all, dark energy is the most accepted theory amongst scientists (which are all incredibly more qualified than you on the subject) to explain why the universe appears to be expanding at an accelerating rate.
And yes, galaxies are moving away from each other that's just a fact. All you have to do to see if a galaxy is moving away from us is to measure the redshift of light emitted by said galaxy.
Educate yourself on the subject, you are incredibly ignorant.
painkillerzman 10 months ago
@painkillerzman
most acccepted theory, u mean assumption!! even its accepted by science, the dark energy is still an unknown, and even science cant explain it! for example; water is a fact, earth is a fact, air is a fact because we know they exist and we need them to survive but dark energy's existence is questionable. i know the science always tend to accept the most understandable theory but at times scientists can be wrong too, as einstein thought the universe was static!!
idontwantnoname 10 months ago
@idontwantnoname If dark energy's non-existence is so obvious and you can explain it why don't you write a paper on it or something ? You'd get fame amongst the scientific community, mabye even a Nobel prize !
Of course this question is rhetorical, we both know that you cannot disprove the theory of dark matter and that any argument you would advance on the subject would be utterly destroyed by scientists who actually support the theory.
painkillerzman 10 months ago
@painkillerzman
i think its pointless to cary on this discussion, cos i dont want to be destroyed by genuises. :) i rest my case!!
idontwantnoname 10 months ago
@painkillerzman
here is a great video v=w_ULpj-upJY that explains the dark matter and the dark energy, by the genius NEIL TYSON, i hope it helps you understand things and facts slightly better!!
idontwantnoname 10 months ago
OMG in the part where they used CGI to turn the skeleton into the actual animal, I was like OMG I remember that from the scene where they have a fight and there's a 'bloodbath' xD
danthecat21 11 months ago
whales evolution from sea to land ,, think about that maybe land mammals came from whales
19Novakane 11 months ago
mammals came form the water and then on to land just like amphibians
19Novakane 11 months ago
like this if you're an American Athiest!!!
riverlifeva 11 months ago 18
@riverlifeva you have 1 thumbs down...... not from me lol
GamerXD3000 11 months ago
@GamerXD3000 looks like 2 thumbs up to me, however I know religious people only see what they want to see;)
riverlifeva 11 months ago
@riverlifeva Religious people are missing something. Ephesians 4:15 says "Speaking the truth in love we are to grow up in EVERY WAY into the Head, into Christ." Obviously would include evolution too. Time-space circles due to General Relativity & Ecclesiastes 1:9 This explains how John 15:1-2 is possible, how God can be both Vine & Vine-dresser who guides & prunes His own growth! Ephesians 4:10 says Christ ascends to fill all things. Heaven BTW is only a 1500 mile long cube! Rev chaps 21-22.
OmegaSeekerr 11 months ago
@riverlifeva Theres no sush thing in god! And quit calling us athiests!
Megahammerheadshark 6 months ago
@riverlifeva im an english athiest but hey i'll like your comment
RazorsEdge9K 5 months ago
Notice the lack of questioning that evolution actually happens, what age is America pretending to live in? Do Americans actually think this is a controversial issue?
ihaterobbie123 1 year ago 26
@ihaterobbie123 Yes, it is called the 'bible belt'. It has lots of really stupid people living there, all brainwashed by religion.
gregrutz 11 months ago
@ihaterobbie123 *some americans. the ones that ruin it for the rest of us. Always fun to mess with my extremely orthodox mother by telling her what it's like to work with a human head in anatomy class. So don't give in to ethnocentrism, we're not all stuck in the 19th century ;)
JabberwocckyChamber 9 months ago
@ihaterobbie123 Even something as set as physics, specifically gravity, is constantly questioned and reinterpreted. In Science, we should find it strange that there is almost no questioning of evolution by the scientific community. Especially, since Evolution has become so involved in Politics. Politics corrupts science (take for example global warming which is accepted by almost no one now a days)
branhoff 7 months ago
@ihaterobbie123 Religiosity here in America is dangerous and as more people grasp the concepts of science and actual history, the gap between rational people and religious fundamentalists is growing larger and larger. Christianity is on its last stand, it's using extremely abusive cult tactics to preserve it's following and is getting increasingly violent in the face of reality.
I'm a proud American Atheist, and this country is rapidly becoming more and more secular, reason will prevail. :)
KJRUSS0 7 months ago
@KJRUSS0 "Religiosity here in America is dangerous" Yeah, it's not very tolerant of communists, Marxists, or atheist queers like you.
MaximusArurealius 6 months ago
First of all, I'm very conservative and believe in capitalism, second of all, I'm not queer. Fuck you! Your an ignorant piece of shit that mindlessly believes any bullshit someone spews out if it helps you hold on to your primitive beliefs.
How mature is that? Grow up.
KJRUSS0 6 months ago
@KJRUSS0 HAR HAR HAR upset are we? I doubt the you can define conservative OR liberal OR the difference between the two. You can't be conservative and still be an atheist. My primitive beliefs? hahahaha you don't even know what my beliefs are ya imbecile.
MaximusArurealius 6 months ago
@KJRUSS0 "I'm a proud American Atheist, and this country is rapidly becoming more and more secular, reason will prevail." Yes, the same thing happened in Russia. They killed all the Christians they could find and made it into an atheist country. 70 years later it all fell apart because atheism has never been any kind of basis for anything useful. Now the Russian govt is building churches.
MaximusArurealius 6 months ago
@MaximusArurealius Russians killed out of communism and only communism, learn something about history. Stalin originally studied to become a priest before deciding that he rather do politics. During his early years he established and promoted the churches in Russia. He started his term strongly Christian then turn secular later on, but he was killing people the entire time he had power. He became increasingly paranoid and thought the churches turned against him, so he killed the clergy.
KJRUSS0 6 months ago
@KJRUSS0 BTW if you're a queer, when America finally goes down you will have to find a Christian country to hide out in. The atheists don't tolerate homosexuals.
MaximusArurealius 6 months ago
@MaximusArurealius What the fuck are you talking about? Atheists don't tolerate homosexuals...homosexuals should seek protection from Christians? What fucking planet do you live on? Atheists are the most pro-homosexual equality group of people in America, mostly because religion doesn't tell us that it's wrong, rather we listen to science that tells us it's natural. Christians on the other hand...well just look at Uganda, Christians would kill homosexuals off if given the power to.
KJRUSS0 6 months ago
@MaximusArurealius sounds like you got your religions mixxed up.
riverlifeva 5 months ago
@riverlifeva No it sounds like you have your haed up yer arse. HAR HAR HAR
MaximusArurealius 5 months ago
@MaximusArurealius LOL looks like you have your computer up yours.
riverlifeva 5 months ago
@riverlifeva oh NO, I should never go up against someone as witty are you.
MaximusArurealius 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@robbie, you dummass. Here you are on a video trying to prove that wolves turned into whales and you want us to accept it as fact? HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR You're dumber than a bucket of wet hammers.
MaximusArurealius 5 months ago
the hind legs were probably never being used. those would eventually just disappear since it was no longer needed.
Tazy50 1 year ago
emagine that..Litter the floor in Egypt..They have found whale fossils as high as the andes along with Huge Clams 6feet round..Wow i wonder if they walked up there to try and fake the earth was flooded..And this guy here try's to throw off people of the fact sound more like what the Bible says..so to throw that off and try to make it sound like an animal evolution ..and people will be dumb enough to buy it..Those who are ignorant of course..Thing is they have never found anything to know
SeekingChristGod 1 year ago
I guess 8 creationists did not like this information?
wowamonn 1 year ago
True whales don't have teeth do they?
GateMessenger 1 year ago
@GateMessenger
my grandma dont have teeth. she's not human.
roniepao 1 year ago
@ronnie pao your grandma cant give birth she not a woman
datzfast 1 year ago
@GateMessenger there are toothed whales such as the sperm whale but most whales are balleen whales which means they have plates for filtering plankton and other minute organisms through
bigmanoooo1 1 year ago
@GateMessenger so what are killer whales ????
09thebaron 1 year ago
@09thebaron
iirc, they're in the same category as dolphins. "whale" is actually a pretty ambiguous term.
pyr666 1 year ago
@09thebaron dolphins
shilelea 1 year ago
@09thebaron i believe the smallest whales ever living
cf572 1 year ago
@09thebaron Orcas
Omeganueva 11 months ago
so that dessert was once an ocean?
dick110590 1 year ago
mystery solved...lol
h2omanz 1 year ago
GIVE ME MY POKEBALLS!
RIGUY75 1 year ago
Forget it, fossils are invisible to creationists, they can't see them.
Deny, Deny, Deny.
gregrutz 1 year ago
they just discovered a huge whale skeleton..in peru.. like 12 million years old..teeth on bottom and top...really big teeth!..check out on bbc website! bbc dot uk dot co
Neanerthebeaner 1 year ago
@Neanerthebeaner: I looked it up; it's at newsDOT bbcDOT coDOT uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10461066.stm. At 12 million years it is much younger than anything on the Walking with Beasts show (@ 50-35 ma). The picture there is dramatic but very poor, as the prey appears to be a modern blue whale, which is actually twice the length of the Leviathan melvillei, itself comparable to a modern sperm whale or the Basilosaurus in this video. There's also a wiki article; see Leviathan melvilleii.
puncheex 1 year ago
There is a dolphin in japan with 4 fins
mmifsud07 1 year ago
Europe is largly Athiest. This is a great video.
MrJohnnyrace 1 year ago 40
@MrJohnnyrace thats because jews conquered europe in WW1 and own all the media to make sure Christianity is wiped off the face of the earth
idideroo 1 year ago
@idideroo They could do away with ALL religions, it wouldnt hurt my feelings a bit.
MrJohnnyrace 1 year ago
@idideroo If Christianity died tomorrow on its own cross, I would not shed a tear. I would only fear that something worse would fill the gap.
However like Nny said. If all religions were gone? I'd be A-OK!
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
if christianity died, which it basically already is dead seeing that it once ruled europe politically, then the birth rate would further plummet to almost nothing, the birth rate for whites is at death bed levels across the world for 2 reasons 1) decline in christianity 2) the pill/birth control 3) women en masse in the workforce instead of having kids.... also theres a connection between country/religion/privateproperty which would be dissolved, and ISRAEL would make YOU A SLAVE
idideroo 1 year ago
@idideroo I laugh at your "slippery slope" fallacy. Not only is it a logical fallacy but it reeks of racist overtones.
It's just like saying "BUT IF WE TELL YOUNG GIRLS THAT THEY CAN PREVENT VD's WITH CONDOMS, THEY'LL GO OUT AND HAVE WILD ORGIES!"
Leave your fear mongering, tinfoil hat wearing nuttery for Fox News and the Tea Party.
I didn't just mean Christianity. I personally wouldn't care if all religions went the way of the Dodo.
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
and im saying israel/zionism arent going anywhere...and Foxnews is owned by jews it should be called the israeli war channel posing as "ring wing christians" getting christians to fight israels muslim enemies for them. Jews arent dumb, they own the media, and they know that if you rid of christianity, the birth rate plummets and whites die out, being replaced with 3rd worlders who will bring the west to the level of south africa or any other nonwhite 3rd world countries. israel will conquer you
idideroo 1 year ago
@idideroo That's it. Off to the funny farm with you. Time for your meds Idieroo.
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
youre not very smart huh? jews took control control of the central banks and thus the govts thru USURY and bought up the media and funded WW1 to destroy the remaining Christian monarchies and replace them with socialist democracies/communism which the banks control. they then financed hitler to force jews to palestine after the balfour declaration gave them the holy land after WW1 by britain. the israeli mossad did 911 just like USS liberty 1967 as false flags for the usa to fight muslim nations
idideroo 1 year ago
@idideroo
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
@idideroo See, there was a reason why I didn't type anything after your name. It isn't because of me being unable to refute what you are saying.
It's me being dumbstruck by the retarded words that are streaming out of your fingers.
Do you ever actually read the stuff that you type, or does that destroy the illusion you have about your little fantasy world?
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
@sabertooth1980 you just typed so youre full of shit. iran isnt a threat to anyone but israel, and the jewish media and the zionist occupied us govt and the UN which the jewish bankers created are strangling iran and want war. the only reason the ZOG us govt and media targets nkorea is because they have nuclear weapons and have done business with the muslim nations, and israels scared to death because nkorea voted in the UN that zionism is racism, meaning nkorea knows israel wants world control
idideroo 1 year ago
@idideroo Time for your medication Idideroo. You say the craziest things. Next thing you know you'll be denouncing gravity as some sort of jewish conspiracy to steal your lucky charms.
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
@sabertooth1980 if there is one thing that is wrong or inaccurate in what i said, id like to hear it, because i can tell you that everything was 100% fact.... ur complete ignorance left u dumbfounded and that amuses me
idideroo 1 year ago
@idideroo What's that I hear? Is that you telling me to prove you wrong?
Alright, seeing that we are going on insane tin foilhat wearing silly walks. It is 100% fact that the squirrels of the world of conspiring with the retoids in order to make it so that I don't have any socks.
If there isn't one thing that is wrong or inaccurate in what I have said, I'd like to hear it.
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
@sabertooth1980 ok then, i see what ur saying. the former director of studies at the US Army war college, Dr. Alan Sabrosky, who is part jewish, came out and said the israeli mossad did 911 and he said most of the US military is aware because they did the same thing in 1967 to the USS Liberty (which of course you never heard of) and he said the obvious, its covered up because the press is 96% jewish owned. listen to him on youtube hes made many interviews, US Army director of studies
idideroo 1 year ago
@idideroo Argument from Authority doesn't work with me. Give me Evidence. Correlation doesn't equal causation.
Give me evidence or take your medication.
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
@sabertooth1980 you never even heard of the uss liberty, i cant give u a 200 year history lesson this way.... and his interviews state facts, hear from a director of the us army to open ur mind just slightly at least if u can just do that much..... once you do that a FACT based full blown documentary on israel 911 involvement is online made by historians and veterans, its called "911 missing links" its about 12 parts but its the best ive seen u wont have questions after watching it was israel
idideroo 1 year ago
@idideroo See, there are little words that are hot words that really discredit your statements.
One. "Can't give you evidence." If I told you "I can't give you evidence" for the simplest of things let's say I tell you that I own a cat and you want evidence. What reason would you have for believing that I have a cat?
Next. "Open ur mind". I have an open mind. Give me evidence and I can change my position. No evidence. No change.
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
@sabertooth1980 watch alan sabrosky, he gave 3 interviews, pick one.... but since you literally know NOTHING on this subject at all, u might not understand him, so watch 911 missing links the whole thing, it has all the facts of 911 and israel, i cant give u this much info like this if u have NO BACKGROUND knowledge, watch it then come see me, until then dont fucking respond with more nonsense. dipshit
idideroo 1 year ago
@idideroo And there is another thing that is tipping me off to you being a nutter.
You're a 9/11 truther.
Give me Evidence. And I'll respond with "Evidence Please" if you keep going on like you are.
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
@sabertooth1980 watch then come see me
idideroo 1 year ago
@idideroo
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
@sabertooth1980 ........ and btw correlation vs causation has nothing to do with this. watch and hear the many many facts, especially in 911 Missing Links and they put it on youtube
idideroo 1 year ago
@MrJohnnyrace Too bad you mispelt the word, and capitalized it...
gavlang 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why do creationists fight against evolution so much? Just imagine primitive man & if we are all made in the image of god, god looks like an ape? Hairy, dirty, smelly, unwashed, yellow broken teeth, horrible hair.... that is supposed to represent God? No wonder time stops going backward about 5,000 years ago to these people.
Next time u take a look at the image of an Neanderthal man in a museum, i am sure u will pay him a bit more respect - Behold God in all his glory!
ramaraksha01 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Those of us who understand the factuality of evolution, have no need of showing these idiots how, why or that it occurred....It's a matter of natural selection...There children will, or will not be taught the way the world actually works...If they are taught that Jesus will come back from heaven to save them/burn us, then they are less likely to be successful, therefor giving our children an evolutionary advantage..
This is now my position, I'm sick of explaining.
I draw pictures of the prophet
badtrunk456 1 year ago 3
nice fairy tale...jajaja
chuyaventuras 1 year ago
We should all keep in mind that holy books can be poetic and metaphoric.
nazbites 1 year ago 11
Comment removed
RadicalCoolDude 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nazbites that means they're all bullshit and they all don't tell u the truth about the world and how everthying got started
science is great
RadicalCoolDude 1 year ago
Comment removed
tasfastas 1 year ago
and we should all keep in mind that holy books cannot be interpreted as accurate, nor a testimony of holyness, factually they're a selection of multiple ancient texts from multiple religious and philosophical sources, cloned, adapted, passed through. We should also keep in mind that those same rligious writings reflect absolute dominance of societies and segregation of social classes. They're sociological philosophical and historical treasures, although religious people don't see it that way.
tasfastas 1 year ago
look there is no reason for anyone to start screaming demons cause they don't believe in God..just state your proof and move on in peace.Why fight like the devil against the word of God you do not believe in ?
BudPeters44 1 year ago
@BudPeters44
Where's Noah's ark again?
Hmm.. "Despite many rumours, claims of sightings and expeditions, no scientific evidence of the ark has ever been found. [1][2]"
Nothing.
You do know about plate tectonics right? The world changes, it's never the same. Mountians rise and get eroded away
And tell me, how did each pair of animal get food for 40 days, out of the millions of species, and ones with specialized diets?
Did it rain freshwater or saltwater?
Answer the questions I've posed.
evillutionskate 1 year ago
@evillutionskate its in the mountains of ararat and is a national monument for all to see that have been allowed to know about it..Look,i will make a video just for you and others like you..I will show you all the proof i have talked mentioned..and after you refuse to believe what you can plainly see as fact wich is called" willingly ignorant" then atleast you can call people names knowing you are very wrong and living the words of lie's and only repeating what you have been told by God hater's
BudPeters44 1 year ago
i dont like to say this but he's right... there WERE signs of an arc found... if it had the same story like in bible is another question even though i strongly doubt it
donttttt 1 year ago
signs of an Ark ?? watch my vidoes on the ark..they did not only find the ark,but Noahs village,Whats left of his home and the Anchors from the ark scatterd along the grounds..In turkey Noahs Ark is a National monument..why are we not being told this ??? because it would prove evolution a joke and end all their Government Grants and funding not to mention they would look stupid having to rewrite history..cause Noah is one step from Believing that God exist.All thier lies would tumble down.Peace
BudPeters44 1 year ago
please bro... just because they found an ancient village and a ship doesnt mean all evolution is crap... besides noahs story has absolutely nothing to do with evolution and darwinism, thats more the sevendays thing
donttttt 1 year ago
how funny..thats is only a very small portion of what we know..Evolution is a joke..Strange how we don't trust government on almost nothing..But what the teach in public schools if it fits you way of thinking ,then it must be true huh ?? lol..hey you just keep lapping up that Gov. dogfood bro..But there is so many things and proof of what i say..you would have to be willingly ignorant to still believe in evolution and the world being a million years old lol..its not even close to that.Peace
BudPeters44 1 year ago
same goes for you ;) who wrote the bible? where except of humans do you find evidence that what stands in the bible is true? you see? humans invented "god" as well as the bible. we have plenty of evidence for evolution and dont even have to obtain it originally like the bible
donttttt 1 year ago
You should try teaching yourself everything the Gov. kept from you in schools..You ar missing out on the truth.But your choice..i would not wait to long to learn who Jesus is..cause one second after you die...its to late.Peace
BudPeters44 1 year ago
i know who jesus is dude ...and its not that i dont believe in him... just in an different way we in germany use the bible to INTERPRET things to modern life... not everything is meant exactly as it stands in bible
i just dont understand why you are so stubborn to not accepting evolution i mean evidence is everywhere and you betrayed your god and jesus multiple times by killing people for oil in iraq or at least voting the responsible man 2 friggin times
donttttt 1 year ago
lol... i love people who say god is a fairytale then i see this thing.... wolves decided to swim more and they turned into many diff species and dinosaurs and then whales? wtf. im pretty sure use vs disuse was even discredited by darwin as false. if evolution exists its in the dna, so this is bullshit, but honestly dna is set in stone, its not gonna change, it cant. not into different species
Hammerfest08 1 year ago
@Hammerfest08 you so dont have a clue of anything... never sat in a biology class but talking like a wannabe prof.. if you really want to negate something then first inform correctly about it, read about selection, mutation and stuff.
i love people who believe that "god" comes to earth, snips with the finger and thats when the whale was born.
donttttt 1 year ago
@donttttt i have, and there is no evidence a species can turn into another species. in fact we know it cant happen. DNA is set in stone, we inherit genes from both parents, both the same species, we inherit different traits from both, but its the same species. DNA cannot change into another species when both parents combine their DNA. its impossible. nevermind "proof" of evolution, there proof to the contrary
Hammerfest08 1 year ago
@Hammerfest08 so if this is all nonsense, what reason to live had archaeopteryx (he couldnt even fly), ambulocetus and so on? why were they undeniable bindings for two different types? Why should your "god" create such things if he could create whales or birds right away?
I told you to look up mutation, selection, genpool and so on. YOU just gave proof that you have no clue what youre talking about. whats the 'proof' of your theory anyway? the bible?^^
donttttt 1 year ago
@donttttt why does a platypus exist? huh? even evolutionists admit platypus is NOT a transitional species. why does a penguin have wings? thats proof? they need them for balance and to swim. why do we have pinky toes? balance. appendix? helps digestion. asking why a species exists the way it does proves nothing. again, how can DNA change into another species? a human is gonna turn into something else? no sorry
Hammerfest08 1 year ago
@Hammerfest08 If you'd just look up mutation, selection, genpool, gendrift and the other definitions of evolution you would at least understand a bit what an evolutionist is talking about. this will also answer your question. i know myself its very hard to understand and to imagine, but the proof is all around us. without evolution or "turning into another species" we wouldnt have the amount of animals on our planet we'd have without it. so i guess you also dont think we're related to apes...?
donttttt 1 year ago
@donttttt youre last half of that is literally all the evidence there is. why do we look like animals and why so many? evolutionists main evidence is this HAS to be true. ive taken bio courses/books, genetics shows nothing to suggest species change into another. a gene mutation/depletion here or there cant make that big a change, picture a human now turning into a baboon, turning into a bear. thats the same logic behind these graphics, wolf, to crocadile mammal, to whale. impossible
Hammerfest08 1 year ago
@Hammerfest08 yeah that probably will never happen xD human bear come on^^ but we already turned from apes to humans... also little lizards turned to big dinosaurs so it already happened a lot. the changing a mammal was going through when it turned to a whale was big because of specializing to life in water. if polar bears wont die out in the next 50 years they would have probably also changed in the next 5 million years. beside.. may I ask what you believe in? are you religious or creationist?
donttttt 1 year ago
@donttttt use vs disuse is known to be wrong. that theory is discredited even by darwin, that a giraffes long neck came from reaching leaves, or a human would get long arms stretching for a basketball hoop. a wolf cant turn into a whale from swimming more. that is the most far fetched myth. a human turning into a bear would be as dramatic as that happening. u really believe thats possible. us turning into a bear-like thing? cause thats just on par with wolf to whale
Hammerfest08 1 year ago
@Hammerfest08 yeah i believe in that theory. I know that LAMARCKs theory is wrong and darwins theory of selection and mutation is proven to be at least the more obvious. selection and so on is not what lamarck was up to. again you show your unknowing of science. i never spoke of lamarcks theory use vs disuse so why do you bring it up? of course darwin was against it and so am i. i'm still amused you think its more possible when god comes out and BAZOOM there are all animals.
donttttt 1 year ago
@donttttt "because of specializing to life in water" thats ur quote, taking that to mean use vs disuse (yes its lamarck im surprised u heard) theres no way DNA can tell if wolves decided to swim more or not. natural selection cant suddenly realize we need to change from feet to fins. that would be like humans who are pro swimmers marrying only other swimmers to make a living, and eventually they start growing fins over many years. its a nice theory, i agree, but very farfetched
Hammerfest08 1 year ago
also, to answer ur last sentence "you think its more possible when god comes out and BAZOOM there are all the animals" hahaha literally scientists theory is that suddenly out of nowhere matter appeared (even tho science says matter cant be created lol) and then BAZOOM a big bam creates everything and lightning hits mud and BAZOOM a cell and DNA is randomly made which morphs into you LOL."you think its more possible god comes" that sums up evolution, its the only possible "scientific" scenario
Hammerfest08 1 year ago
@Hammerfest08 specializing in water is not necessarily realted to use vs disuse. since you know so much about biology you surely can tell me how darwin would describe the process. and i have to agree with you. of course its a quest we have to answer how matter could appear out of nowhere and you know what? i'm sure there is some "conciousness" behind this. not necessarily an old omnipresent HUMAN being called "god" but yeah something. you think i dont ask anything? you wrong.
donttttt 1 year ago