well let me rephrase that there not 2 mill from the factory but there only making 87 not sports and 7 sports selling them for around 300k and im sure the people getting those are people with connections so you would have to buy one used for an extremely high price becuase of high demand
expensive for nothing, runs high 11s quarter mile ,211mph (cheaper cars reached that already) why is so expensive ?? beacuase only 20 where build ??so that would be rare in the future ??for that money i can buy a villa a boat a car for wife a caravan a still will remain enough cash to build a car faster than reventon to beat in accellaration
@B1ohaZZ4rd i was in Rome and Venice and there was some crazy scooter driving going on wheelies like it was nothing and just hauling ass down narrow streets fucking savage man
Oh wow... a car vs. a FUCKING JET. I wonder who's going to win this race? I'm gonna go out on a limb here and bet all my life savings on the jet. Alright... now where's my fucking money????
2009 Lamborghini Reventon = $1,600,000.00 plus Tax
I would want the Reventon and sell it then buy me a $1.4 million dollar house in beverly hills and a supercharge Corvette ZR1 with 750HP for $150K out the door and eat the Reventon for snack at any race venue...peace
@MrToits there is no house in beverly hills for 1.4 million dollars dude, trust me. or else its a teeny tiny house. or even a shed, shack would be more. lol
il Tornado ha due turboventole Turbo-Union da oltre 7.000 kg. di spinta, la prova che hanno fatto nel video è stata eseguita con l'aereo "scarico" ossia niente armamento e/o serbatoi supplementari. In quelle condizioni il Tornado (come qualunque aereo da caccia) può essere portato in decollo "lanciato" ossia accelerando al massimo a postbruciatore inserito con aereo da fermo per poi rilasciare i freni (riduce lo spazio di decollo). In quelle condizioni non c'era lamborghini che teneva...
The car (most any car) is going to take off quicker from a stop since its power is connected directly to the pavement. Same thing from this test is shown with jets on an aircraft carrier. That's why they use catapults to launch if they need to be up to speed in a short distance.
That said, a jet will always win with enough distance.
sorry british dude but the f22 outperforms all other fighter jets in the world in every catagory. the only things even close are the EF2000 typhoon and the f35 lightning
lambo dont care about making their cars look crazy, this car looks like a concept!!!!! awesome car i think its called the reventon because its got lots of REV'S hence the name REVenton =) lmao
Why do American's think that if it's not an F-22 Raptor and not American then it's just some peice of slow-ass shit. I know there ARE lots of better planes than the Tornado but it still does well over mach 2 you know? Anyways we have something over here called a Eurofighter Typhoon so keep your stinking Raptor!
the raptor was designed well before your beloved typhoon was even a thought in its creators head and it was designed to kick the shit out of any opposing fighter so the typhoon doesnt stand a chance plus 5th gen fighters are better then 4th and 4.5th gen fighters
4th Gen , 4.5 Gen and 5th Gen is a term made up by Lockheed Martin , There is over 45% of tech in the Eurofighter thats not in the F-22 , so you think 4.5 Gen is applicable? No , so fuck and go lick some windows fucking retard.
hmmm i wonder who would win the typhoon or the "lemon" gee i dont know the Lemon because its main feature is STEALTH something your precious typhoon doesnt have and if your precious typhoon gets within range of an AIM-120 AMRAAM its falling back to earth in a fireball not knowing who shot the missile...so whos the lemon now.
whats the matter cant accept that the Raptor is better
Or shall i accept the T-38 got a lock on? You will probably dispute that , probably saying it wasnt in stealth mode or some shit , trust me when the MBDA Meteor comes it will blow the AIM-120 out the water , Just shows US equipment is shit.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
oh yeah our weapons are shit...so tell me why more countries use our weapons then yours....oh thats right because ours are better...i know its hard to hear but its true....thats why more countries buy from the US then were ever youre from
Firstly i see you avoided the T-38 comment , nice :) , secondly you play dirty handed tactics , example? ok , the Lockheed Starfighter , Where the company bribed the Defence ministers of European counttries , same happened with the F-16 , funny that the AH-64 the British bought where they added and improved the aircraft that now your own country wants to buy the upgrades we put on the AH-64 , funny that
out of the two fighters you just mentioned the F-16 was more popular with european countries because back in th 1970s the F-16 was at the paris Air show with military personel in the Crowd who ended up signing to order Hundreds of F-16s EACH....and the british probably modified to apache for the same reason we modified the harrier
ha you went strait to the apache subjest cuz you know im right about the F-16 and you brits have must not be confident enough in things you buy because the apach works fine for the US army.and if the engine can lift the apache off the ground and make it go fast enough than the engine is powerful enough.and putting more rockets on the appache isnt a modification adding something like a second set of propellers on or making the fuselage longer is a modification
Oh so they aint updating the FCS , Engines , Rotor Blades inline with the British? Oh must be Westland who make our version of the AH-64 the WAH-64 , they must be lying right?
Yeah i ignored your comment reference the F-16 just like you did with mine reference the T-38 lock on with a F-22
JUST SHUT UP ALREADY who cares if a T-38 locked onto an F-22...the USAF probably tested out a few scenarios...plus if youve seen the videos youd see the Raptor wasnt even trying because an F-22 can out turn all fighters that oppose it. and can withstand like most fighters 9 Gs in the video its wasnt even doing Half that...and who cares if you brits modified a chopper oh yeah thats BIG news made world headlines...two thumbs up for that....what do you want a medal now.
This is not exactly something to brag about. UK had to buy a helicopter from another country then modify it for a mission. Kind of like a backyard tuner bragging about a bolt-on kit. Why buy an Apache? The Russians and Italians also have attack choppers the UK could have purchased.
Why? Because its battle proven unlike the Italian Augusta or the Russian one thats not reliable and politically UK buying Russian would never haapen. Besides the British variant of the AH-64 is by fa better as it has more powerful engines and larger fuel tank allowing more weapons to be carried amongst other add ons , its far better then the US version as even the US is adopting the British changes to its fleet of AH-64's
Different missions, U.S. doesn't need folding blades since this isn't operated on ships. That would be Marine Corps which uses AH-1 for maritime. Apache was turned down for shipboard years back in the U.S. Different weapons, choice of rockets are different, less selection of missile variety on UK model.
Engine difference is due to shipboard operations. Power increase is 5% per engine and not sustained.
The Rolls Rpyce Turbomecca gives more then a 5% increase , more like 10% , the CRV7 rockets uses by the UK are more powerful then the US ones and we can carry more , and less selection of missiles? You mean Hellfire!!! They are incorporating Starstreak HVM AA missles into the WAH-64 , which even the US is looking to purchase too , not to mention a specific communications suite specifically designed for the WAH-64 something the US variants dont have . BTW i aint no yank hater i am a realist
Again, does the mission need it? If not, you'll not see it. UK is going to have to throw all eggs in one basket instead of specialize. 2,100 hp is a 5% increase from 2,000. Your cards consist of naming a weapons system specific to your country as a bragging right while discounting it's an add-on to an entire helicopter created elsewhere. Similar to going on and on about after market tires you bought for a Lamborghini to take it off roading.
Well firstly i said 10% so clearly you cant read and of course the power hike is needed as it means we can carry more with the added power. And so what if i mentioned weapons specific the comment was regarding the WAH-64. So what my profile says about me , i know what yours says and represents and that represents a twat
What next, the shade of paint is something you like better although the actual military planners may decide it doesn't suit the mission? Nifty sunglasses that can be worn at night the next brag?
"So what if I mentioned specific weapons"... That's what I'm saying but it's the base of your position. The comment from your view clearly isn't on the WAH-64, a licensed helicopter from another country but on the add-ons your country bolts on it.
Add ons we bolted on to make it BETTER , CRV7 rockets are more powerful then the US counterparts , if the US versions were more powerful then we would of bought them , its not down to the country the stuff is bought from its what does the better job.
My Xenophobia? Your a bit deluded arent you. The Add ons are the WAH-64 fleet wide not just mission specific and yes the Lynx can carry the same rockets , so your point being what because yuor making yourself look stupid
Strong xenophobia, you state it yourself like it's something to be proud of when you come across as a relic from the past. Mission specific as in your leadership has decided that will meet its needs the best for the mission. The same reason the U.S. purchased the Harrier years ago and it's no longer the same as the Sea Harrier these days. Would the U.S. version work for the Brits and visa-versa as well as what each country has come up with on its own? No.
In your case the Lynx would be best since the rocket is the key in your sales pitch and it's a helicopter with British origin. You actually don't have to brush over its origins while touting the home grown options. Same as hating Italians but owning a Lamborghini while going on and on about the mud flaps you installed.
I couldnt careless about the Lamborghini , its pointless , The Lynx was the AAC AT platform but it was not designed for that purpose hence why we purchased the Apache and no the Lynx is not totally British its part French
The Rockets we use a tungsten tipped and antui personell , i have no obsession ,your the one that keeps bringing it up , so i reply or can you not read? The first comment i made was regarding the F-22 where this car got its design and ergonomics idea's from , then some idiots came on talking shit stating this and that about British and US kit , but like you really. Plus look at the tags , Tornado , F22 if your looking for them it'll take you here weather you like cars or not
Actually you've brought rockets up numerous times. Especially odd when your government admitted over reliance on these was a mistake years back. Seems like a personal obsession, an outdated one at that.
So, you go to every video with a tag of Tornado or F22 to comment while ignoring the video title?
Hmmm , you even aware that rockets are the best form of an anti personell weapon? no you wouldnt , your not in the forces , and yeah i still went on here i couldnt careless what you think , its not my fault you cant get to grips with someone posting a reply to someone who mentioned the F-22 in the first place.
You sound like someone from your government procuring defense contracts PRIOR to 2006. Since that time they've admitted the rockets approach was a mistake. You live in the past. Too predictable you'd try to portray yourself as a military genius simply because you claim to be in the military.
"posting a reply to someone who mentioned the F-22 in the first place." that's a problem when the only reason people like you and that guy come into a thread is to derail it. Look at the title, not tags.
Mate , you seriuosly need to grow up , it seems your getting your daily kicks about talking shit on youtube GROW UP , i myself couldnt give a flying fuck what you think as i have a life , no go crawl back under the rock you came from.
Poor thing, don't throw a tantrum. Do you do this on your own or is it your Mums ordered you to make sure that birthday subscription to Janes paid itself off and what better way to do that then play soldier on YouTube.
My Janes subscription? My you really are trying to impress me now by saying this and that when really its you with the subscription , i dont need to play soldier because ironically i am one , i have seen the WAH-64 in action , i bet all you have done is sit on your arse playing xbox and reading up on stuff on wikipedia , now go play with some moving cars thats much more fun!.
That's the amusing part, everything you've been posting is available online, like your source wikipedia. Forget the soldier talk or whatever character you like to play dress up in front of the mirror while having time to post daily here. Don't bother doing the biography creation thing either and posting back about all the action you've seen since WWI.
Really???? So having a friend in the Army Air Corps that works as ground crew on the WAH-64 , you think i get info from wikipedia?? Forget the soldier talk?? I am a soldier you dipshit beleive it or not is not my problem , yes i am on here ever heard of Xmas leave?? Biography? What the fuck are you on about , your clearly losing the plot , i know who i am where i have been and what i have done and weather you like it or beleive is not my problem its yours plus i couldnt care less
I don't really care if you pick up after elephants at the zoo. Go find a publisher if you want to write a story. Look where you're at. Youtube and a car thread at that and you're so insecure you're now posting a resume.
Why would i need to post a resume you dip shit? Why would i need to go find a publisher? I suggest you pull your head out of your arse and go do something with your life instead of getting all excited over a video sharing website.
I suggest you go find something to do with your life while on "Xmas leave" instead of posting off topic crap on a video sharing website. Speaking of excited, are you spitting all over the keyboard as you come back again and again to defend yourself, typing fuck and shit to look all tough guy.
Well last time i checked i could do pretty much what i like and if you dont like it you have to reply to comments i make do you? thats purely your choice but very childish
Are you looking in a mirror when you come in for your very regular posting routine? I mean talks shit has you pegged along with all your other personal qualities you continue to reveal.
Job site is right. Why else would you feel the need to come up with some personal story about yourself on YouTube as a defense for what you are?
Defence of what i am? I dont need to justify or defend myself at all but saying i am gives me more credibility over what i say rather then some cellar dwelling vitamin and sunshine deprived leech such as yourself , you just didnt like the fact that i was right , just deal with it and move on.
But you're on here justifying and defending yourself again and again. Why? What was it you feel you were right with? Oh yeah, looking for anything with tags, ignoring the title and blindly posting in it with stuff found on the net.
Just pointing out, ANY plane can get a lock on a stealth fighter (or bomber) if the stealth pilot aint trying.
As for the Typhoon/Raptor argument, Ive seen both of them fly. Both jets are incredible. Its tough to say which one would win in a dogfight, and the only real way to say for sure would be to have them fight eachother.
Its a pretty well known fact though that the 22 is quite possibly the best fighter on the market right now
Quite possibly if it isnt raining for which the F-22's stealth means nothing or the fact that its within visual range then the Eurofighter would piss all over it , its a proven fact that every aircraft maker the world over other then Lockheed has said that the F-22 is a white elephant , they all cant be wrong can they!
IF it gets within its visual range. Youre assuming that the F-22 hasnt already fired an AMRAAM. Why the hell would we have a Raptor in the air when its raining anyway? Not entirely sure why you brought that one up
You dodged the question. Why would we send a Raptor up in the rain? Not to mention the Raptors dont need to use the stealth all the time, so thats more or less irrelevant.
Dodged what question?? If its an all weather fighter it shouldnt matter weather rain etc effects but it does , having water on the skin of an airframe is like another skin that is over the radar absorbant skin of an F-22 and you say they dont need to use stealth all the time? so whats the point in having it if you dont need it , i truly believe that 'stealth' is just a fad and if it did come up against a proper fighter the stealth wouldnt help it
Sure, rain makes the stealth go south. Big deal. What I mean by "it doesnt need the stealth all the time", is the only time it would REALLY need stealth is on a mission. If its just doing a routine patrol flight around the base (like all US fighters do), then it really wouldnt matter if the stealth was active would it? Because theres no chance that it would matter if they were picked up on radar
Lol some1 hates americans...dont get me wrong im aussie, but fighter planes r all about air dominance so the fact that ur tornado does mach 2 means shit all wen u get owned in 2 secs by a raptor sure the euro fighters good but it's nothin to raptor
really i think the point he's making is that the tornado isn't exactly a SLOW plane, so this was still a pretty kick ass vid for the lambo... so it's a bit ridiculous saying "well if it was the raptor" and so on, cos it doesn't matter.
I don't get why you people think speed is everything. Look at it this way. How many fucking times are oyu going to be able to reach the top speed in any hyper car, not often. So that just means they are numbers to brag about, and people hate braggers.
The only important thing is super cars is the style, comfort, and acceleration. This car looks awesome. Very rarely will you get it going 350km/h, besides you always have the risk of a herendous crash at those speeds, if your not good.
Well you got to be a compete tard if you think your going to say get a Bugatti to it's top speed on the highway.
Acceleration is everything. If you go from 0-100km/h in 10s even with a top speed over 300km/h it will be no fun. But you go from 0-100km/h in 4 seconds it is a blast.
Look at the lotus Exige, top speed 238 km/h acceleration 0-100km/h 4s. That is my desire to sport bikes, fast acceleration.
speed is a good thing because its fun showing people what car can do and i have ridin lambos b4 and all have had style,comfort and acceleration and no i know this will be exactly like the others
Yeah but you can only show your speed on a track. Sure everyone probably speeds on the highways, but I doubt you will get any super car to it's top speed on a highway.
if you notice....the jet is at its lowest speed, throttle pulled all the way back, and landing gear down. Its all set up haha. No way this thing could ACTUALLY beat the Tornado (aircraft in the vid)
they weren't racing dudes. it just a promotional fly and as for the bugatti. .... no one in their right mind ever tought a bugatti will beat any modern fighter jet . it's just impossible . it's like comparing the fastest man in the world to the fastest car. and saying the man will beat the car. .... back to the topic. jet have afterburners that are suppos to propell the aircraft faster than the speed of sound. try to keep up with that on a prodution car.
true, but when the people who aren't stupid are influenced in negative ways, often more ways than one....not that this vid's comments effects any. But you get my point
cant get enugh of the accelleration sound, and hey it beats the f-22 raptor in accelleration but not in max speed. Of course it cant go in super sonic I mean its just a car ffs. Ima get this car even if I gave to steal it....JK.
No idea why they made this car, if the only thing it can do is flash some god damn pilot shit in the dashboard.. lambo has made nicer looking, and faster cars then this. They shouldn't have made this so damn exclusive. BUT, thats just my opinion.
No, not the best car to come out for years to come. Lamborghini has made nicer looking, faster, more fuel efficient cars then this. I think customers wanted something new so they pulled this out of there ear.
What are u on about, this is a super car, nobody cares how much does a car drink if its a super car, the more the better. About the design, it is absolutely the best looking car ever done to date, costumers here were some 20 lucky rich duders whom had more than just a connection with the Lambo company, or long time costumers. On the inside it's the best design ever and the display in the dashboard is next level. It's the best car for me and it will be for a long time. .
Lol do you even understand what they're saying in this vid?
Wtf r u on about again.. The general public will never have a supercar, 20 duders can get this in a 6 and half billion popul. U like 10 yrs old or sumthing hhahaz.
"Wtf r u on about again" "U like 10 yrs old or sumthing hhahaz." Your undermining me as a 10 year old. Your more ignorant then a 5 year old. Lets put it in terms you can understand. "I'm on about" why they built only 20 of these, and they should have mass produced these or not built them at all, and as earlier stated, ITS JUST MY OPINION. Stop acting like a fucking smart ass when your so zoned out that you won't let others share there opinions. Oh and, please don't write another ignorant reply.
hihihihihihiihih
97whitedragon 5 months ago
e' l' auto piu' arrararrautica mai stata costruita..
piero802003 6 months ago
well let me rephrase that there not 2 mill from the factory but there only making 87 not sports and 7 sports selling them for around 300k and im sure the people getting those are people with connections so you would have to buy one used for an extremely high price becuase of high demand
dontTOUCHmeOK 8 months ago
la buggatti fa da 0 a 100 in 2,3 secondi. e tira fino ai 407 se levi il limitatore dal computer fa anke i 420.
Th3Can0 1 year ago
expensive for nothing, runs high 11s quarter mile ,211mph (cheaper cars reached that already) why is so expensive ?? beacuase only 20 where build ??so that would be rare in the future ??for that money i can buy a villa a boat a car for wife a caravan a still will remain enough cash to build a car faster than reventon to beat in accellaration
elaifarr 1 year ago
@elaifarr Your math is a little off. Unless you live somewhere where villas are cheaper than regular cars.
And you could do up some import all you want but you aint gonna be ballin like the dude that owns the Reventon.
13expose13 1 year ago
se gavesse i soldi me ne compraria una
SuperStefano09 1 year ago
Italians are mad but in a good way
Nigelk388 1 year ago
@Nigelk388 I'm italian bui i'm not mad xD
B1ohaZZ4rd 1 year ago
@B1ohaZZ4rd i was in Rome and Venice and there was some crazy scooter driving going on wheelies like it was nothing and just hauling ass down narrow streets fucking savage man
Nigelk388 1 year ago
@Nigelk388 they are stupid ....
B1ohaZZ4rd 1 year ago
@B1ohaZZ4rd no why
Nigelk388 1 year ago
Oh wow... a car vs. a FUCKING JET. I wonder who's going to win this race? I'm gonna go out on a limb here and bet all my life savings on the jet. Alright... now where's my fucking money????
thi711 1 year ago
Bugatti Veyron is the BEST!!!!!!
Dante550505 1 year ago
lol if somehow some sparkpug broke you would have to wait a year to get another lamborghini sparkplug
TheCruzmeister 1 year ago
I smell Italian marketing shit...
jaxgrant 1 year ago
@jaxgrant you suck.... buy a threecycle!
razo198 1 year ago
@razo198 Let me guess, you're Italian?
jaxgrant 1 year ago
reminds me on Vector W8...Aeronautic style
psychonaut25 1 year ago
the jet didn't even hit his after burner thats why the car got in front.
honeybunchickens 1 year ago
lo cojo con mi fiat uno y lo pierdo eske no me ve ni el umo jajajajijiji
elvasoplastico 1 year ago
Faster than a Jet??
felix0911176727 1 year ago
2009 Lamborghini Reventon = $1,600,000.00 plus Tax
I would want the Reventon and sell it then buy me a $1.4 million dollar house in beverly hills and a supercharge Corvette ZR1 with 750HP for $150K out the door and eat the Reventon for snack at any race venue...peace
MrToits 1 year ago
@MrToits there is no house in beverly hills for 1.4 million dollars dude, trust me. or else its a teeny tiny house. or even a shed, shack would be more. lol
blahbabbles 1 year ago
@blahbabbles well if that is the case I'll have a cool $1,400,000,00 in my bank account........good day!!!!!!!
MrToits 1 year ago
il Tornado ha due turboventole Turbo-Union da oltre 7.000 kg. di spinta, la prova che hanno fatto nel video è stata eseguita con l'aereo "scarico" ossia niente armamento e/o serbatoi supplementari. In quelle condizioni il Tornado (come qualunque aereo da caccia) può essere portato in decollo "lanciato" ossia accelerando al massimo a postbruciatore inserito con aereo da fermo per poi rilasciare i freni (riduce lo spazio di decollo). In quelle condizioni non c'era lamborghini che teneva...
pupadidi 1 year ago
DU idiot !
itapeter 1 year ago
Il Re della Tibburtina ai radar gli va ner culo, lui passa con la moto a duuennovanata davanti ai telepas...!!!!
ACTupgrade 1 year ago
they need o race a REAL fighter jet
lightswitch94 1 year ago 3
at first the tornado caught up to the lamborghini but then the lamborghini went like the wind
boom it beat the jet.
haseebmlk 1 year ago
I just felt real lust for a car for the first time in my life.
Symph909 1 year ago
i want a nissan gtr proto
mushybushy5657 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ugliest car ever.i ll go with a ferrari or a carrera gt for speed and beauty.
masterpatric07 1 year ago
hahaha lets see the revonton go against the f-22. It would be left in the dust.
andrewm153351 1 year ago
i would want the plane and sell it and get me like 5 reventons and a nice big mansion.
n00niez 1 year ago 32
@n00niez you do relize revontons are like 2mill and the jet its racing probably isnt that much more
dontTOUCHmeOK 8 months ago
@n00niez i will not buy that plane of urs :p
stick to it
High2Tension 3 months ago
I want a lambo reventon
cholorecio732 1 year ago 2
nice publicity stunt! xD
1yoyo105 2 years ago
Comment removed
padaya19 2 years ago
italy..
stardustneuron 2 years ago 4
Italy...but it is owned by Volkswagen which is a German company
Qasimbajwaa 1 year ago
@Qasimbajwaa What does that mean?? engine is Italian is Italian aesthetics is all made in italy Italian Lamborghini is and will remain ...
normascalo 1 year ago
Yeah im just saying that Volkswagen is now the owner of the company...
Qasimbajwaa 1 year ago
Money is the Germans, but who invented and built in Italy by an Italian named Ferruccio Lamborghini
mobeno 1 year ago
Italy
CaptainJackRyan 1 year ago
italy
SEmichi14 1 year ago
italy.
jialucase 1 year ago
lol keyboard warriors!
chilledpain 2 years ago
Sto giornalista potrebbe ben fare un salto dal logopedista..LamboVghini VeVVenton...ma dai paiàz!
danygrano 2 years ago 2
@danygrano
quoto xD
Respir0 2 years ago
bubbles867 and bc1969214 are now happily married ^^
YOURANOOBTRUSTME 2 years ago 13
@YOURANOOBTRUSTME Their kids will look like trolls.
TurboRonin83 1 year ago
@TurboRonin83 lmao
StreetSurfinn 1 year ago
1:13 that guage cluster is BADASS!!!
andy993 2 years ago
You can switch modes on that display as well, see watch?v=GMopzWyDW1I
bc1969214 2 years ago
WOW! Looks like a fighter jet display. Not that I'd know what that looks like but I'd imagine it looking like that LOL....
andy993 2 years ago
The car (most any car) is going to take off quicker from a stop since its power is connected directly to the pavement. Same thing from this test is shown with jets on an aircraft carrier. That's why they use catapults to launch if they need to be up to speed in a short distance.
That said, a jet will always win with enough distance.
bc1969214 2 years ago
Epic Car
MaNrLio 2 years ago
vs nothing?
Fiinniinnii 2 years ago
batman car??
boliack02 2 years ago
sorry british dude but the f22 outperforms all other fighter jets in the world in every catagory. the only things even close are the EF2000 typhoon and the f35 lightning
warlockplaya 2 years ago
Molto bella la battuta finale..
TheKlugSynth 2 years ago
lambo dont care about making their cars look crazy, this car looks like a concept!!!!! awesome car i think its called the reventon because its got lots of REV'S hence the name REVenton =) lmao
salfemist 2 years ago
lolols whats with the american vs brit arguements ? anyways.. id LOVe to have a car like that xD
tragic4eva 2 years ago
they said this was like the raptor not the tornado, there is not 1 vid with the reventon and the raptor
LP640roadster 2 years ago
can reventon stop the bullets ?
Vietboy1st 2 years ago
Reventon beats bullets and flicks them out of the air.
mateor09 2 years ago
atu tutifruti
miguel29092 2 years ago
i have a post card set of this event. the reventon was somewhat inspired by the f-22
lancelo96 2 years ago
lol boys' toy...it's a fucking car for god's sake
LordNelson87 2 years ago
Why do American's think that if it's not an F-22 Raptor and not American then it's just some peice of slow-ass shit. I know there ARE lots of better planes than the Tornado but it still does well over mach 2 you know? Anyways we have something over here called a Eurofighter Typhoon so keep your stinking Raptor!
VolcanicRatsBum 2 years ago
Eurofighter Typhoon has thrust vectoring or any thing eles that would make a commpetor in todays dogfights id rather have a jas 39
lastopher7 2 years ago
the typhoon doesnt have thrust vectoring
BRIANROX1 2 years ago
the raptor was designed well before your beloved typhoon was even a thought in its creators head and it was designed to kick the shit out of any opposing fighter so the typhoon doesnt stand a chance plus 5th gen fighters are better then 4th and 4.5th gen fighters
BRIANROX1 2 years ago
4th Gen , 4.5 Gen and 5th Gen is a term made up by Lockheed Martin , There is over 45% of tech in the Eurofighter thats not in the F-22 , so you think 4.5 Gen is applicable? No , so fuck and go lick some windows fucking retard.
bubbles867 2 years ago 2
what about the other 55% oh thats right the other 55%is in the raptor and not the typhoon...who should go lick windows now retard.
BRIANROX1 2 years ago
And the 55%? face it the F-22 is a lemon , every defence contractor has said that other then Lockheed Martin.
bubbles867 2 years ago
hmmm i wonder who would win the typhoon or the "lemon" gee i dont know the Lemon because its main feature is STEALTH something your precious typhoon doesnt have and if your precious typhoon gets within range of an AIM-120 AMRAAM its falling back to earth in a fireball not knowing who shot the missile...so whos the lemon now.
whats the matter cant accept that the Raptor is better
BRIANROX1 2 years ago
Or shall i accept the T-38 got a lock on? You will probably dispute that , probably saying it wasnt in stealth mode or some shit , trust me when the MBDA Meteor comes it will blow the AIM-120 out the water , Just shows US equipment is shit.
Sooner you face that the better.
bubbles867 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oh yeah our weapons are shit...so tell me why more countries use our weapons then yours....oh thats right because ours are better...i know its hard to hear but its true....thats why more countries buy from the US then were ever youre from
BRIANROX1 2 years ago
Firstly i see you avoided the T-38 comment , nice :) , secondly you play dirty handed tactics , example? ok , the Lockheed Starfighter , Where the company bribed the Defence ministers of European counttries , same happened with the F-16 , funny that the AH-64 the British bought where they added and improved the aircraft that now your own country wants to buy the upgrades we put on the AH-64 , funny that
bubbles867 2 years ago 4
out of the two fighters you just mentioned the F-16 was more popular with european countries because back in th 1970s the F-16 was at the paris Air show with military personel in the Crowd who ended up signing to order Hundreds of F-16s EACH....and the british probably modified to apache for the same reason we modified the harrier
BRIANROX1 2 years ago
The British modified the AH-64 , because the current AH-64 in US guise didnt carry enough rockets and the engines were not deemed powerful enough
bubbles867 2 years ago 3
ha you went strait to the apache subjest cuz you know im right about the F-16 and you brits have must not be confident enough in things you buy because the apach works fine for the US army.and if the engine can lift the apache off the ground and make it go fast enough than the engine is powerful enough.and putting more rockets on the appache isnt a modification adding something like a second set of propellers on or making the fuselage longer is a modification
BRIANROX1 2 years ago
Oh so they aint updating the FCS , Engines , Rotor Blades inline with the British? Oh must be Westland who make our version of the AH-64 the WAH-64 , they must be lying right?
Yeah i ignored your comment reference the F-16 just like you did with mine reference the T-38 lock on with a F-22
bubbles867 2 years ago 2
JUST SHUT UP ALREADY who cares if a T-38 locked onto an F-22...the USAF probably tested out a few scenarios...plus if youve seen the videos youd see the Raptor wasnt even trying because an F-22 can out turn all fighters that oppose it. and can withstand like most fighters 9 Gs in the video its wasnt even doing Half that...and who cares if you brits modified a chopper oh yeah thats BIG news made world headlines...two thumbs up for that....what do you want a medal now.
BRIANROX1 2 years ago
No i dont needa medal , you have just proved right there how narrow minded , you and Americans are.
bubbles867 2 years ago 4
This is not exactly something to brag about. UK had to buy a helicopter from another country then modify it for a mission. Kind of like a backyard tuner bragging about a bolt-on kit. Why buy an Apache? The Russians and Italians also have attack choppers the UK could have purchased.
bc1969214 2 years ago
Why? Because its battle proven unlike the Italian Augusta or the Russian one thats not reliable and politically UK buying Russian would never haapen. Besides the British variant of the AH-64 is by fa better as it has more powerful engines and larger fuel tank allowing more weapons to be carried amongst other add ons , its far better then the US version as even the US is adopting the British changes to its fleet of AH-64's
bubbles867 2 years ago
Different missions, U.S. doesn't need folding blades since this isn't operated on ships. That would be Marine Corps which uses AH-1 for maritime. Apache was turned down for shipboard years back in the U.S. Different weapons, choice of rockets are different, less selection of missile variety on UK model.
Engine difference is due to shipboard operations. Power increase is 5% per engine and not sustained.
bc1969214 2 years ago
The Rolls Rpyce Turbomecca gives more then a 5% increase , more like 10% , the CRV7 rockets uses by the UK are more powerful then the US ones and we can carry more , and less selection of missiles? You mean Hellfire!!! They are incorporating Starstreak HVM AA missles into the WAH-64 , which even the US is looking to purchase too , not to mention a specific communications suite specifically designed for the WAH-64 something the US variants dont have . BTW i aint no yank hater i am a realist
bubbles867 2 years ago
Again, does the mission need it? If not, you'll not see it. UK is going to have to throw all eggs in one basket instead of specialize. 2,100 hp is a 5% increase from 2,000. Your cards consist of naming a weapons system specific to your country as a bragging right while discounting it's an add-on to an entire helicopter created elsewhere. Similar to going on and on about after market tires you bought for a Lamborghini to take it off roading.
Your profile states pretty clearly what you are.
bc1969214 2 years ago
Well firstly i said 10% so clearly you cant read and of course the power hike is needed as it means we can carry more with the added power. And so what if i mentioned weapons specific the comment was regarding the WAH-64. So what my profile says about me , i know what yours says and represents and that represents a twat
bubbles867 2 years ago
What next, the shade of paint is something you like better although the actual military planners may decide it doesn't suit the mission? Nifty sunglasses that can be worn at night the next brag?
"So what if I mentioned specific weapons"... That's what I'm saying but it's the base of your position. The comment from your view clearly isn't on the WAH-64, a licensed helicopter from another country but on the add-ons your country bolts on it.
bc1969214 2 years ago
Add ons we bolted on to make it BETTER , CRV7 rockets are more powerful then the US counterparts , if the US versions were more powerful then we would of bought them , its not down to the country the stuff is bought from its what does the better job.
bubbles867 2 years ago
Add-ons to meet the mission planners come up with same as folding blades. Guess you could fly your rockets around in a Lynx?
"its not down to the country the stuff is bought from " that wouldn't be some of your xenophobia melting away, would it?
bc1969214 2 years ago
My Xenophobia? Your a bit deluded arent you. The Add ons are the WAH-64 fleet wide not just mission specific and yes the Lynx can carry the same rockets , so your point being what because yuor making yourself look stupid
bubbles867 2 years ago
Strong xenophobia, you state it yourself like it's something to be proud of when you come across as a relic from the past. Mission specific as in your leadership has decided that will meet its needs the best for the mission. The same reason the U.S. purchased the Harrier years ago and it's no longer the same as the Sea Harrier these days. Would the U.S. version work for the Brits and visa-versa as well as what each country has come up with on its own? No.
bc1969214 2 years ago
In your case the Lynx would be best since the rocket is the key in your sales pitch and it's a helicopter with British origin. You actually don't have to brush over its origins while touting the home grown options. Same as hating Italians but owning a Lamborghini while going on and on about the mud flaps you installed.
bc1969214 2 years ago
I couldnt careless about the Lamborghini , its pointless , The Lynx was the AAC AT platform but it was not designed for that purpose hence why we purchased the Apache and no the Lynx is not totally British its part French
bubbles867 2 years ago
"I couldnt careless about the Lamborghini " why are you visiting a Lamborghini video then?
What is with your fetish with rockets? Your own government admitted its over reliance on them years ago.
bc1969214 2 years ago
The Rockets we use a tungsten tipped and antui personell , i have no obsession ,your the one that keeps bringing it up , so i reply or can you not read? The first comment i made was regarding the F-22 where this car got its design and ergonomics idea's from , then some idiots came on talking shit stating this and that about British and US kit , but like you really. Plus look at the tags , Tornado , F22 if your looking for them it'll take you here weather you like cars or not
bubbles867 2 years ago
Actually you've brought rockets up numerous times. Especially odd when your government admitted over reliance on these was a mistake years back. Seems like a personal obsession, an outdated one at that.
So, you go to every video with a tag of Tornado or F22 to comment while ignoring the video title?
bc1969214 2 years ago
Hmmm , you even aware that rockets are the best form of an anti personell weapon? no you wouldnt , your not in the forces , and yeah i still went on here i couldnt careless what you think , its not my fault you cant get to grips with someone posting a reply to someone who mentioned the F-22 in the first place.
bubbles867 2 years ago
You sound like someone from your government procuring defense contracts PRIOR to 2006. Since that time they've admitted the rockets approach was a mistake. You live in the past. Too predictable you'd try to portray yourself as a military genius simply because you claim to be in the military.
"posting a reply to someone who mentioned the F-22 in the first place." that's a problem when the only reason people like you and that guy come into a thread is to derail it. Look at the title, not tags.
bc1969214 2 years ago
What next, you find a weather related thread with a tag for tornado and start playing Goering in it?
bc1969214 2 years ago
Mate , you seriuosly need to grow up , it seems your getting your daily kicks about talking shit on youtube GROW UP , i myself couldnt give a flying fuck what you think as i have a life , no go crawl back under the rock you came from.
bubbles867 2 years ago
Poor thing, don't throw a tantrum. Do you do this on your own or is it your Mums ordered you to make sure that birthday subscription to Janes paid itself off and what better way to do that then play soldier on YouTube.
bc1969214 2 years ago
My Janes subscription? My you really are trying to impress me now by saying this and that when really its you with the subscription , i dont need to play soldier because ironically i am one , i have seen the WAH-64 in action , i bet all you have done is sit on your arse playing xbox and reading up on stuff on wikipedia , now go play with some moving cars thats much more fun!.
bubbles867 2 years ago
That's the amusing part, everything you've been posting is available online, like your source wikipedia. Forget the soldier talk or whatever character you like to play dress up in front of the mirror while having time to post daily here. Don't bother doing the biography creation thing either and posting back about all the action you've seen since WWI.
bc1969214 2 years ago
Really???? So having a friend in the Army Air Corps that works as ground crew on the WAH-64 , you think i get info from wikipedia?? Forget the soldier talk?? I am a soldier you dipshit beleive it or not is not my problem , yes i am on here ever heard of Xmas leave?? Biography? What the fuck are you on about , your clearly losing the plot , i know who i am where i have been and what i have done and weather you like it or beleive is not my problem its yours plus i couldnt care less
bubbles867 2 years ago
I don't really care if you pick up after elephants at the zoo. Go find a publisher if you want to write a story. Look where you're at. Youtube and a car thread at that and you're so insecure you're now posting a resume.
bc1969214 2 years ago
Why would i need to post a resume you dip shit? Why would i need to go find a publisher? I suggest you pull your head out of your arse and go do something with your life instead of getting all excited over a video sharing website.
bubbles867 2 years ago
I suggest you go find something to do with your life while on "Xmas leave" instead of posting off topic crap on a video sharing website. Speaking of excited, are you spitting all over the keyboard as you come back again and again to defend yourself, typing fuck and shit to look all tough guy.
bc1969214 2 years ago
Well last time i checked i could do pretty much what i like and if you dont like it you have to reply to comments i make do you? thats purely your choice but very childish
bubbles867 2 years ago
"Why would i need to post a resume you dip shit?"
You're the one posting it on YouTube. Might want to try a job search site unless you feel someone is going to be impressed here to hire you.
bc1969214 2 years ago
A job site? i have a job you retard , you mustnt have one though i mean you get your rocks off talking shit on here , explains everything
bubbles867 2 years ago
Are you looking in a mirror when you come in for your very regular posting routine? I mean talks shit has you pegged along with all your other personal qualities you continue to reveal.
Job site is right. Why else would you feel the need to come up with some personal story about yourself on YouTube as a defense for what you are?
bc1969214 2 years ago
Defence of what i am? I dont need to justify or defend myself at all but saying i am gives me more credibility over what i say rather then some cellar dwelling vitamin and sunshine deprived leech such as yourself , you just didnt like the fact that i was right , just deal with it and move on.
bubbles867 2 years ago
But you're on here justifying and defending yourself again and again. Why? What was it you feel you were right with? Oh yeah, looking for anything with tags, ignoring the title and blindly posting in it with stuff found on the net.
bc1969214 2 years ago
BTW, the question of "Why?"wasn't meant seriously, just meant for a "Yank" hater to have to lay out reasons his/her country had to order out.
bc1969214 2 years ago
Just pointing out, ANY plane can get a lock on a stealth fighter (or bomber) if the stealth pilot aint trying.
As for the Typhoon/Raptor argument, Ive seen both of them fly. Both jets are incredible. Its tough to say which one would win in a dogfight, and the only real way to say for sure would be to have them fight eachother.
Its a pretty well known fact though that the 22 is quite possibly the best fighter on the market right now
cipher619 2 years ago
Quite possibly if it isnt raining for which the F-22's stealth means nothing or the fact that its within visual range then the Eurofighter would piss all over it , its a proven fact that every aircraft maker the world over other then Lockheed has said that the F-22 is a white elephant , they all cant be wrong can they!
bubbles867 2 years ago
IF it gets within its visual range. Youre assuming that the F-22 hasnt already fired an AMRAAM. Why the hell would we have a Raptor in the air when its raining anyway? Not entirely sure why you brought that one up
cipher619 2 years ago
Because it was said by a m,ember of congress when looing into cutting the numbers of raptors that rain basically fucks up the 'stealthy' RCS
bubbles867 2 years ago
You dodged the question. Why would we send a Raptor up in the rain? Not to mention the Raptors dont need to use the stealth all the time, so thats more or less irrelevant.
cipher619 2 years ago
Dodged what question?? If its an all weather fighter it shouldnt matter weather rain etc effects but it does , having water on the skin of an airframe is like another skin that is over the radar absorbant skin of an F-22 and you say they dont need to use stealth all the time? so whats the point in having it if you dont need it , i truly believe that 'stealth' is just a fad and if it did come up against a proper fighter the stealth wouldnt help it
bubbles867 2 years ago
Sure, rain makes the stealth go south. Big deal. What I mean by "it doesnt need the stealth all the time", is the only time it would REALLY need stealth is on a mission. If its just doing a routine patrol flight around the base (like all US fighters do), then it really wouldnt matter if the stealth was active would it? Because theres no chance that it would matter if they were picked up on radar
cipher619 2 years ago
Lol some1 hates americans...dont get me wrong im aussie, but fighter planes r all about air dominance so the fact that ur tornado does mach 2 means shit all wen u get owned in 2 secs by a raptor sure the euro fighters good but it's nothin to raptor
pazza1010 2 years ago
really i think the point he's making is that the tornado isn't exactly a SLOW plane, so this was still a pretty kick ass vid for the lambo... so it's a bit ridiculous saying "well if it was the raptor" and so on, cos it doesn't matter.
IceStoneCold 2 years ago
I like the car, but Tornado's are shit.
Warpath2198 2 years ago
I bought two of them! :)
scareface999 2 years ago
liar
aljo0069 2 years ago
They must take a f-22 raptor, this plane has a much better wieght ti trust ratio and can easily fly vertical^^
Johnuwine 2 years ago
you wish
maxorke 2 years ago
uhh i find this on the level of extreme bullshit...
KamiKazeStorm 2 years ago
wow there are some haters
ballinxalex 2 years ago 2
I don't get why you people think speed is everything. Look at it this way. How many fucking times are oyu going to be able to reach the top speed in any hyper car, not often. So that just means they are numbers to brag about, and people hate braggers.
The only important thing is super cars is the style, comfort, and acceleration. This car looks awesome. Very rarely will you get it going 350km/h, besides you always have the risk of a herendous crash at those speeds, if your not good.
b4igetu 2 years ago
Are you gay?
dkickboxer 2 years ago
Well you got to be a compete tard if you think your going to say get a Bugatti to it's top speed on the highway.
Acceleration is everything. If you go from 0-100km/h in 10s even with a top speed over 300km/h it will be no fun. But you go from 0-100km/h in 4 seconds it is a blast.
Look at the lotus Exige, top speed 238 km/h acceleration 0-100km/h 4s. That is my desire to sport bikes, fast acceleration.
b4igetu 2 years ago
one word ......... valium
golddang 2 years ago
bugatti veyron 0-300 15s (;
superlativeconspise 2 years ago
speed is a good thing because its fun showing people what car can do and i have ridin lambos b4 and all have had style,comfort and acceleration and no i know this will be exactly like the others
wwefan9872 2 years ago
Yeah but you can only show your speed on a track. Sure everyone probably speeds on the highways, but I doubt you will get any super car to it's top speed on a highway.
b4igetu 2 years ago
i have a boner
SHCConker 2 years ago
talk normal...
blackdayz3 2 years ago
ummm lamborghini is only 300-400km/h
F-22 is 2500km/h lamborghini is more faster at speeding up but when f-22 is on full power F-22 will win
floridaRC 2 years ago
check out "kingballer005"s 2 videos and u will have a new favorite.............. hes a rising youtube talent
MNtwins3752 2 years ago
The Bugatti Veyron cant even beat the tornado, go check out TopGear on youtube, they have a video of the drag race with bugatti vs tornado
Unk0wnS0LlD3R 2 years ago
its a veyrob vs a typhoon not tornado....
huge difference the tornado sucks its to heavy compared to the typhoon
dn2711 2 years ago
if you notice....the jet is at its lowest speed, throttle pulled all the way back, and landing gear down. Its all set up haha. No way this thing could ACTUALLY beat the Tornado (aircraft in the vid)
cambruda 2 years ago
they weren't racing dudes. it just a promotional fly and as for the bugatti. .... no one in their right mind ever tought a bugatti will beat any modern fighter jet . it's just impossible . it's like comparing the fastest man in the world to the fastest car. and saying the man will beat the car. .... back to the topic. jet have afterburners that are suppos to propell the aircraft faster than the speed of sound. try to keep up with that on a prodution car.
dipo84 2 years ago
I now that...im just tired of REALLY tired of stupid people thinking that a car will beat an aircraft like that.
cambruda 2 years ago
who cares what stupid people think
crankthetoto 2 years ago
true, but when the people who aren't stupid are influenced in negative ways, often more ways than one....not that this vid's comments effects any. But you get my point
cambruda 2 years ago
cant get enugh of the accelleration sound, and hey it beats the f-22 raptor in accelleration but not in max speed. Of course it cant go in super sonic I mean its just a car ffs. Ima get this car even if I gave to steal it....JK.
xatrag 2 years ago
I'd drive it wearing oxygen masks, but a HUD on the dash would be even cooler.
peace2daearth 2 years ago
the eurofighter would be faster than the lamborghinin !!
jNS278 2 years ago
you mean F-22, of course an F-22 would rape any car!
planefreak3 2 years ago
.....any fighter would be faster then the lambo
cipher619 2 years ago
No idea why they made this car, if the only thing it can do is flash some god damn pilot shit in the dashboard.. lambo has made nicer looking, and faster cars then this. They shouldn't have made this so damn exclusive. BUT, thats just my opinion.
adztermancoool 2 years ago
im pretty sure they just made it to show the future direction of the company in regards to styling
carnut666 2 years ago
Yes. But still..
adztermancoool 2 years ago
its awesome, the best car out now and for years to come.
shadowline900 2 years ago
No, not the best car to come out for years to come. Lamborghini has made nicer looking, faster, more fuel efficient cars then this. I think customers wanted something new so they pulled this out of there ear.
adztermancoool 2 years ago
What are u on about, this is a super car, nobody cares how much does a car drink if its a super car, the more the better. About the design, it is absolutely the best looking car ever done to date, costumers here were some 20 lucky rich duders whom had more than just a connection with the Lambo company, or long time costumers. On the inside it's the best design ever and the display in the dashboard is next level. It's the best car for me and it will be for a long time. .
shadowline900 2 years ago
Guess thats YOUR opinion then. But the general public of about 6 and a half billion people want super cars too.
adztermancoool 2 years ago
Lol do you even understand what they're saying in this vid?
Wtf r u on about again.. The general public will never have a supercar, 20 duders can get this in a 6 and half billion popul. U like 10 yrs old or sumthing hhahaz.
shadowline900 2 years ago
"Wtf r u on about again" "U like 10 yrs old or sumthing hhahaz." Your undermining me as a 10 year old. Your more ignorant then a 5 year old. Lets put it in terms you can understand. "I'm on about" why they built only 20 of these, and they should have mass produced these or not built them at all, and as earlier stated, ITS JUST MY OPINION. Stop acting like a fucking smart ass when your so zoned out that you won't let others share there opinions. Oh and, please don't write another ignorant reply.
adztermancoool 2 years ago
they should have given that car more hp
800 sounds good
volcom13xx 2 years ago 4
reventon can 340km .......murcielago can 357 km
4damage 2 years ago
this shit cant even break the sound barrier. If I see one ... im gonna put a bowling ball through the windshield.... >:D(huff and puff )>:D
XLalkaustaX 2 years ago
.....because so many cars can....
donimyer 2 years ago 3
haha :D that looks so freakin cool...those 2 pilots inside that reventon with their oxygen masks on xD
Imagine they get stoped by a cop they lower the windows and the cop sees em using their oxygen masks : " officer...we weren't speeding..."
egoleech 2 years ago 10
very nice video"
bigdaygroup2 2 years ago
Thanks for the Upload!
bigdaygroup2 2 years ago
speak some fuckin english
3hree6ix 2 years ago