Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • GOOD VIDEO!good luck in your research

  • Cryptozoology novel  see video book trailer

  • It's unusual how the heel is very flat and doesn't dig into the sand like a human foot would.

  • Yeah. I see human prints. Same size as your bootprints. I want my five minutes of life back. There is nothing unusual about those prints, other than someone who has arch problems.

  • It is not arch problems that you are seeing but the midtarsal break. Check out my blogs and search my archives you will see the same group of  4 track's I have been casting since 2007. I have cast about 80 so far. I only cast the most detailed of their right and left at each site. This is how I can validate that they are from the same ones.

  • Okay this person by the name of albertabuck who claims that he has faked bf tracks and fooled an expert but won't say who. He claims that he is a winter survival instructor but won't say who taught him. He claims that the BFRO had verified one of his tracks but won't say who but attacks me on my proof. It was fun and games until he insulted Dr. Meldrum so now he is banned from my site. Do you folks out there think I did the right thing?

  • sure you did. Entertaining healthy skeptics is one thing, there is no reason to entertain haters that hate for the sake of hating.

  • You are absolutely right. He started skepitcal then became a total jackass. You will find much envy in this endeavor mostly from those with nothing to show. To me castings are hard evidence. A lot of people don't really understand what it would take to fake a trackway. A master craftsman would need to hike many heavy varied casts of the original and have them correspond with the substrate it is crossing all in hopes that someone finds them in the middle of nowhere? Not much logic to that.

  • No logic at all. You are doing great research and you will find many arm chair "researchers" who try to bait you and dis you. You don't and IMO shouldn't respond to these people - let them doubt - that's fine - they aren't the ones out hiking and documenting - you have nothing to prove to them - only yourself.

  • Actually I think you are to lenient on the people who come on her and give you grief. Keep up the good work.

  • like where are you even looking? there is so many truck tracks and shit around. it seems pretty silly to say a bigfoot was out walking around on the beach shortly after this person left.......i know your steamig inside cause you know i got you pinned, well maybe you will try and gather some real evidence instead of making your own....whos Dr Meldrum? another fake?

  • You are a very angry person with much envy. You still have not answered why you can't prove you faked tracks. If you don't know Meldrum then you know nothing since the BFRO knows him well, your a fake!!. For the respect of Dr. Meldrum I will no longer communicate with you. Best of luck you are gonna need a lot of it. BTW the hair samples match Meldrums samples.

  • like i really dont want to rag on you but its lame to see fake tracks over and over again...what do you do for a living..? are you a cryptozooligist ? if your not then why do you talk like you are...saddle hills footprints in the snow.....we had someone from the brfo come out and check them out..he said it was 100% bigfoot...it was me....

  • i do know what im talking about. And no im not a "camper" i have taken several outdoor survival courses and am a qualified instructor for winter time survival. im 22 years old and have seriously spent every minute of my life in the bush...i have spent a 2 week period in the kakwa wilderness with no food or water. Just cause a cast fits another cast that you made doesnt mean its real...you made both of them...your hair samples DNA came up inconclusive.i am 100% sure i spend more time in the bush

  • Who qualified you? What's their name? Why can you not prove you faked tracks? So what you are saying is I fooled Dr. Meldrum as well as others credible in the field but not you because you know what you are talking about. What proof do you have? tracks? hair? photos? I was training in the jungles of southeast asia as well as other areas around the world before you were born. Why don't you prove me wrong by bringing evidence to the table instead of hash slinging

  • first frame in the video, you can see that the toe holes appear to be poked in. There is no toe itself, just a hole. it doesnt even connect to the foot

  • I cast these tracks and they fit tracks I had taken 80 miles away. I have shown these tracks with Dr. Meldrum and he agrees. You don't know what you are talking about.

  • i have a better chance at seeing it then you...

  • Lol.... Envy does not look good on you.

  • How old are you?

  • well i dont have any credentials, i do spend every bit of free time in the bush, i also work everyday in the bush...not on oil roads but heli forestry work deep into the mountains...but other then that i do believe they are out there, but i have faked tracks that have been reported and documented as real..i cannot say what tracks but they are presumed to be real...by an expert...so i lost faith in the so called experts.....give me somthing other then the same old track...or fuzzy photo..or dna

  • working in the bush and living in the bush are two entirely different things. I don't claim to be an expert only that my unorthodox approach has proven fruitful as compared to the now traditional approach to the subject. You claimed to have faked tracks but cannot prove it which makes your story sound contrived. My proof is in the casts, hair samples and digging stick as well as my consistency in finding them. This is my 2nd season and I have over 80 casts. Search my archives, it's all there,

  • again, your a fraud

  • If you think so then don't bother checking my site out.

  • you must have an open container of glue by you, those are your own foot prints. were not going to find bigfoot with people like you messing with data and such. The only place they will be is the coastal or intieror of BC and north of that

  • As Dr. Meldrum has told me before "Those greatest proponents are those who are least informed". If you think bigfoot is limited to certain areas then you know very little on the subject. What is important is those who are credible agree with me. What are your credentials?

  • Definitely human. There's no mid-tarsal hinge, the ball of the foot is obviously toward the front of the foot just like a humans.

  • Dr. Meldrum or myself do not believe they are human. You need to read the blogs to understand the background behind these.

  • Has Dr. Meldrum seen THESE particular tracks? Based on what I've read about Meldrum's research, these are completely human. I think YOU are the one who hasn't done their homework. Have you even heard of the mid-tarsal hinge? That's pretty much what decides whether or not it's a Sasquatch print, all of these prints in this vid show pressure ridge just behind the ball of the foot. Obviously human. Dr. Meldrum would think the same.

  • Dr. Meldrum has been in close contact with me about these 4 individuals and he does agree with me, (read the narratives and blogs to be informed). There is much more going on then the lay person can understand. Dr. Meldrum brings his 2 decades plus as an anatomist and I bring 2 decades of practicing medicine, mostly in the Operating Room. What credentials do you have to validate your opinion?

  • Credentials? I can tell you that a Sasquatch foot and human foot are very different in morphology. Why don't you take your boot off in the next vid and go for a walk and compare them to what you've been finding...

  • So are you saying that Dr. Meldrum and myself are wrong? How long have you studied morphology? What is your school of training to make these claims? Credentials are proof that you have satisfied the scientific and medical community of your knowledge through schooling and boards, otherwise anyone could do surgery or say what they want about anything.

  • I just watched all of your videos. Some of those do look like Sasquatch prints, but the ones on the beach BLATANTLY show a very human-like ball toward the front of the foot and an arch. I've worked very closely with BFRO investigators and am in the process of taking a tracking course and have read a few books on foot morphology.

  • And oh yeah, I was serious about taking your boot off and comparing some of those prints to your own foot. Not making fun or anything, it would just be an interesting comparison. Please respond to this with a yes or no answer in the next post, I hate having to repeat myself.

  • They are all from the same 4 individuals and they will vary based on the substrate it is crossing along with other variables. Others have requested the same and I have compared mine to those in question and they are much different especially in weight and proportion, there are other suttle clues. I have traveled the world as a Marine Grunt (infantryman) and taught skills necessary to those in the bush as well as being a soldier. Books are great but its bush time that separates novice from pro.

  • All of the videos of tracks you see here are from the 4 same individuals ( I know this by cast comparison, Meldrum agrees). I have worked with the BFRO before and do work with other investigators from the BFRO. Read books take classes but most of all do the bush work and you will go far. My best to you in all of your endeavors.

  • The footprints look to be around the same size as the boot prints. I thought sasquatch tracks were 13 to 20 inches long.

  • Are you reading the narratives? It's all there. I don't think that they are born with size 20 feet. If they do then I feel sorry for the mother.

  • Hey, I'm a believer in their existence. It just seems like you should have encountered a few large tracks by now.

  • I have encountered a 12" and 14". The 14" is in the group of videos. Are you going through it all? I know it is a lot but if you want to know then you know what you got to do. Visit my myspace blogs for more information

  • it actually makes a lot of sense as to why you aren't encountering a lot of the stereotypical BF foot print - 18". The older the squatch the longer they have been around and learned to cover their tracks or which routes to take to stay out of human contact. Young squatches either haven't learned or are less careful - therefore lots of smaller finds.

  • Great insight something I have pondered. They may also understand that the normal human will write these off as human without ever thinking it through. It is most likely a learned behavior.

  • My exact thoughts. I have photos of a 14 inch that I have only picked up a couple of times and if I am reading the tracks right they can jump great distances. I also wonder if they are smart enough to opportunize on human arrogance with us thinking that they are human tracks and not questioning why someone would be walking in such cold and harsh conditions and at such high elevations and great distances.

  • Next time could u film the surrounding ?

    I know my english is not that good

  • I do not film the surroundings to keep others out of these areas. The last thing I want is for a trigger happy hunter shooting an innocent bystander/hiker.

  • Aaah. Kinda smart.

  • I think that we have underestimated them greatly. Check my blog archives to see my interactions with them

  • Good find, excellent prints. Keep up the research.

  • Thanks for the support. I have recently found the same 10 inch about 10 miles south of this site. More to come soon

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more