At one point the host says "of course you dont" when the man on the show cant answer a question. The host is intentionally asking more and more specific questions that even a 911 expert would be hardpressed to give an exact answer. And Although at a much greater scale, the
7 year old asking why analogy wasnt a false analogy, it applied to what was going on. No of course he doesnt know exact facts and figures to disprove every single ridiculous conspiracy theory
Asking someone to verify these minute reports as 100% false is absurd. September 11th was chaos. There were reports of a 5th hijacked plane (air korea i believe) which landed safely in alaska, there were reports of a bomb in the towers, there were reports of two white trucks in the city loaded with explosives, some occupants of the towers didnt even know it was hit by a plane. More likely than not, these people were trying to claim their group or associates had done this and gain notoriety
The fact that a minute is used to analyze what the term pull means is again absurd. And how can you verify that the men claiming to be hijackers werent lying? There is evidence far beyond reasonable doubt about the identity of the actual hijackers. There is video from the airport terminals of hijackers getting on the plane.
i understand where both parties are coming from (remaining objective here) but the talkshow host was addressing him as if he was the former president bush, or someone who wouldve had inside intelligence had there been some sort of conspiracy theory. And its easy to side with the radio announcer when the guest is being grilled and talked over. That being said, the "pull it" quote was absurd, its not a demo term, and why wouldnt they come up with some sort of code word had it been a conspiracy
PM makes a major mistake in their investigation. If there is a question that the government may be involved (even if you don't beleave they are) you can't use any evidence they give you. You have to check everything yourself, for example test the steel youself and check the original picture negitives. You can't just say "they showed us a picture" and let that be good enough. So if it's an inside job or not the "report" or story by PM holds no merit because the source of the info is in question.
This popular mechanics douche is first cousins with Zionist, dual U.S./Israeli citizen, PNAC member Michael Chertoff who freed and sent over 100 Israeli spies back to Israel that were rounded up subsequent to 9/11.. He's a traitor to the U.S. and belongs in jail for aiding and abetting the criminals responsible for 9/11.
Wonder where this moron shill is now? Prolly working for the media in Japan? Nope no radiation here nope. There was radiation but it's in the evidence but that's buried under tons and tons of concrete. Can't tell me there's no concrete have you been there? No? Well, see I know what I'm talking about!
After listening to this it makes me think P/M was given the task to explain the official story. If it was his job to verify the facts, he should have been able to answer these questions. His job was to investigate the DNA issue. Id he was a good reported, he would have checking into this when he did the P/M Report and had the explanation available. P/M just lost my respect.
People! Liberalism/progressivism/neoconservatism IS a mental illness! The United States Incorporated in The District Of Columbia, which is a foreign country, is being run and managed by the mentally insane. STOP VOTING FOR THESE CRIMINALS!!!
Davin Coburn is a complete douche bag! He must be a liberal; instead of carrying on an intelligent conversation, when Goyette questions him on sources and credibility he likens Goyette to a 7 year old asking why. What a fuckstain!
The NIST report released late 2008 proves that Davin Coburn was lying about seeing some photo that was 'confidential' of the damage to WTC7. "25% of the facade scooped out". What a traitor.
If such a photo existed, then NIST would have used it in their report, and 2ndly they would have claimed that damage had something to do with the collapse of WTC7.
Anyone knows where Davin Coburn is hanging these days? Someone needs to interview him again and ask him to explain his lies before we hang him.
Whether 9/11 was an inside job or not, at least we can all agree that popular mechanics has an agenda and are prepared to lie therefore disqualifying their hit piece. Chertoff has been caught lying and meigs told o'reilly that cell phones work perfectly fine and then in a debate with loose change on democrcay now he said "we did'nt say they worked well but they did work."
Popular Mechanics lied about just about everything. Where they didn't lie was when they selected 'arguments' which were not from the 9/11 Truthers but planted by the CIA so that they could be debunked.
Popular Mechanics, especially the chief editor James Meigs belong in prison. Why you think these were the only guys willing to publicly defend the Official story? You know why, cause no one else want a WANTED: DEAD OR ALIVE hanging over them in years to come the truth would out.
Now they have PM's debunking the Fema camps on Glenn Beck. Are they going to debunk that the Fed reserve isn't a government agency. Are they going to tell us the Fed government isn't run by corp's and bankers? America is absurd. Yet you have SO MANY PEOPLE who believe PM's as gospel. WOW.
the NIST report that came out in AUG 2008 disproves davin coburn and popular mechanics. they said that their were no firefighters in that building and the fire sprinklers didn't work which was the reason the buildings integrity degraded in 7 hours supposedly.
Daven Coburg got taken off the rounds after that. We didn't see him again. He hasn't polished his jewishness very well. The jews will just lie directly in your face even when you have the evidence in your hand staring at them. Look up "Sir Rudy admits WTC7 was fed black-op center" on YT. Shakespear wrote about it in Merchant of Venus. There are 1000s of infamous quotes about this nature of the jews. This is their last ascendancy.
@shtfuk666 It would have been ten times better of an interview if he had just cornered the douche and forced him to explain how iron and steel had melted.. Popular Mechanics totally skirted this issue by creating a strawman argument in which they just said.. "steel didn't have to melt for the towers to fall".. clearly this "answer" doesn't explain how and why STEEL DID MELT in ALL the buildings that collapsed. The molten steel is the smoking gun evidence that can't be explained away.
@dankums it didnt have to melt it had to heat up hot enough to weaken the steel so that it gives away. also expanding at the joints due to heat would cause the collapse. the molten steel seen in the building is from the firefighters cutting the beams.
James Meigs and Devan Coburn of Popular Mechanics who were charged with doing the rounds on all media and spewing their lies in total defense of the official narrative are both Zionist jews, most probably with Israeli passports. The South Park hit-piece: Zionist jews Tray Parker and whatshisname. The two comedians I forgotten their names: Zionist jews. All the articles in Aussie: Zionist jews. Who did 9/11? Zionist jews.
Well then I understand why! Being a zionist you would have no choice but to support the attack. How else would you get the goyim to die, fight and pay for your wars and destroy your enemies!?
The elite of this Zionist mafia don't mind killing jews too. But they definitely did everything they could to make sure no non-US Israelis died on 9/11. There were 4000 Israelis working and living around WTC on 9/11. Not one died. Odigo warnings....Ah man its so obvious its boring. But the sheeple must be awakened, the sleeping giant will rise and Israel will become a place in a mythical place again.
Its a total lie. I went to the Controlled Demolition website and found four instances of them using the term "Pull it". And in two of them they actually used quotation marks. And they were describing the use of explosives to bring the buildings down. So he has lied on every issue in this interview. Disgusting Zionist jewish pig.
Goyette is a putz. No on ever said that 'hijacker dna' was found 'amognst the molten steel'. Also, original 'hijacker dna' was found in their hotel rooms and rental cars.
Maybe we can go out on a limb and say that Davin simply does not know the answer regarding the dna. He claims he'll get back to Goyette though. It is just frustrating because PM claims to be the authority on this topic. I mean they wrote a giant article and published a book.
mjs28c, we all expect zionist pigs like you to resort to talmudic libel.
Goyette NEVER says any such thing, it is the lying pissface Coburn that states @ 6:08 "The remains of the hyjackers who have been widely understood to have been on those planes. There was DNA evidence collected all over the place.
Then the Coburn PUNK avoids the question and runs off to THEE most laughable fraud, and says "Particularly out of the Pentagon."
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The hotel room was registered to the hijackers. Their DNA was found in the room, and it was matched to DNA found in the wreckage. Bear in mind that DNA of WTC employees was also found in the wreckage. So, finding DNA in that rubble was not unlikely.
how did they know the DNA in a hotel room belonged to the hijackers? what did they match THAT with? If you match hotel room DNA to the DNA in the wreckage, and vice versa, you have nothing.
@ThoughtCrime7 There's no way, they expect us to believe that they went through all that rubble and found all the DNA of the 19 hijackers but only left 240 pieces of steel for nist to examine. To seperate the DNA of 3000 victims from the 19 hijackers would take more than 24 hours. I'm just guessing but i would presume months but they cleaned up the area within weeks so there's no way they could have collected all the DNA.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Again, the rooms were registered to them. They matched DNA found in the room with DNA found at the site. Don't forget, the hijackers shaved themselves the night before. "If you match hotel room DNA to the DNA in the wreckage, and vice versa, you have nothing." ??????
You might be able to prove that SOMEONE who was in that hotel room was ALSO in the WTC. That's it, and that is NOTHING in terms of matching it to the hijackers!!!!!!!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I haven't 'changed the subject'. The DNA of the people who were registered in the hotel room was also found in the WTC wreckage. Those same people are shown boarding the plane which crashed into the WTC. People were wondering how the same DNA was found in the hotel room and the wreckage....and I've just cleared up that 'mystery'.
Yes you did change the subject. The question was, where did they get the DNA to match with the DNA found at ground zero. Answer was hotel room.Then the question was, where did they get the original DNA to match with the one in the hotel room. Then you bring up security camera. A security camera does not take DNA samples, so the question still stands. And, please, tell us the source for your claims about where DNA was found and what matches what, that means if you have a source. Thanks.
One more time: The DNA was takem from the room they were registered in. That DNA was then matched to DNA found in the wreckage. The occupants of that room were shown boarding the plane which later crashed into the tower. You keep asking about 'original DNA'. What original DNA are you talking about? "A security camera does not take DNA samples." Obviously! But it shows a clear link between the occupants, the plane, and the wreckage.
If they indeed matched DNA from ground0 with DNA from a hotel room, it's plausible to say that someone who was in a certain hotel room at some time was also in the WTC at one time. But how do they know this someone was the hijackers? Thousands going in and out the WTC every day, they surely recovered thousands of DNA samples from bathrooms, carpets, clothes... Why don't you name your source? Where is the studyt? If you told me your source, I wouldn't waste your time discussing this claim. thanks
@jeffmoppi Exactly, you're still presuming it's the hijackers. The only way you could confirm would be if you already had their DNA on file which we must presume they did'nt plus the time frame at which they confirmed their identities comes into question.
re: Larry Silverstein 'pull it' comment. The implication is that he was responsible for the collapse of WTC7. This further implies that he masterminded massive insurance fraud AND admitted to as much on video. Then why have the insurance companies not launched an investigation? And how is Larry - a landlord - able to convince the NYC fire department to collapse a building? And how, ethen, did the NYC fire department trigger the collapse?
re: Larry Silverstein taking an 'enormous' insurance policy. He had to. You cannot own/operate any structure in NYC (or in probably any city) without insurance. Nothing odd or conspiratorial about this.
If any of you are one of the remaining 18% that still believes Bush had nothing to do with 9/11 then spend a few days here: 911docs dot net ... Enough said
This generation that never had to fight for for this country has their heads so far up their asses that it's coming all the way back out of their throats and looking back at me and it is disgusting!
They pulled the building and everybody knows it. The building needed to go. It's a bullshid argument. Where's all this leading? George Bush did it? My gosh people are really mad about that election.
7 Hijackers all came forward? Bullshit, 1 report in the BBC says your gay, I guess it's true.
Ya know, that was really satisfying having a random caller stump a guy from a national magazine on the air. It's nice to see a charismatic host show who the unbelievable conspiracists really are for once.
Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies - you have uncovered them all and the only people who defend these lies work for the American Government.
PM have been busted lying over and over. Where are the fucing photos of WTC7's north side? Oh, the NYPD has them? And itsok to see footage of our brothers and sisters jumping to their deaths but not of the damage to a fucking building? Thats it. I'm getting my gun.
It is creepy to listin to Coburn sell his party line bullshit. He is just a young guy, did he get a big promotion? Did his master say,well done son! with a pat on the back?
Sending out guys that sound like any lying teenager only hurts the official story and deepens public suspision.
"Coburn was the senior editor and fact checker". i have seen jr hi kids on jeopardy who r more accurate & more logical than this pos. why did this idiot go on air trying 2 defend pm's bs? his answers werent very convincing nor factually correct. plus he couldnt disguise his frustration & animosity like the other pm douchebags do publically. next time pm better send one of their heavyweights, who will still wont have any answers, but is better at propaganda than this loser.
how can so much importance be placed upon "pull it". When interviewed silverstein said he was told by the fire chief that he didn't think he could save the building... he said pull it. I don't know how that is any evidence at all... it can be used for either argument depending on how you personally interpret it. And if thats not bad enough some guy calls in to give the dictionary definition... People say things all the time that don't follow the dictionary definition to a tea.
"We made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse" followed by video of the collapse (5:20 pm). The building had already been evacuated by 11 am
(NIST, FEMA). Anyone who says he meant evacuate is evacuating your leg.
explain to me how a building that size can be wired for demolition... which takes months mind you... can be done without anyone knowing... further more there is no evidence that there were any explosives at the scene.. do you really think a conspiracy of this magnitude that would have to involve as many thousands of people as it did, could be kept secret... I mean they couldn't keep Watergate a secret or clinton gettin his dick sucked...
Any building can be wired for demo. Who said it was done that day? They did it during the unprecedented power downs days and weeks before. Secrets kept from you: who really killed Kennedy, Tonkin lie, war in Indonesia, Manhatten Project, many more. Do you really think the corporate media would tell YOU anything? They lie all the time and fools believe it.
Oh yeah or the different approach. First, deny everything (the term "pull it" used in demolition). Second, admit that some of the claimed information is, after all, true (the term "pull it" is used when a building is brought down with a cable). Then third, when asked for something else say something completely irrelevant to the question (term "pull it" was said in a contex of "team").
I don't want to spend hours of stress doing research--I just want an excuse to relax and laugh at conspiracies; the Popular Mechanics book allows me to do just that.
i got a cracker for u...zeitgeist: the federal reserve, parts 1 - 5.
U love laffin at conspiracies?, go watch this, it'll soon wipe the smile of ur face. seriously go and watch it, ull have all ur reasons behind the 911 conspiracy rite there in under half n hour too.
After listening to this, Popular Mechanics has now officially been discredited of any positive effect it could've possibly had into solving this great mystery. Thank you, Charles Goyette for asking real questions, and thank you Davin Coburn for not being able to even remotely address the questions. It enlightens us all on how brilliant the corporate world is in its attempts to discredit the nation.
No. This is proof that conspiracy believers will never accept that their was no conspiracy because it's impossible to answer every question with a satisfactory answer. For believers, it's a self-reinforcing paranoid delusion. "Why haven't we been shown the secret 240fps digital video recording of the plane hitting the Pentagon? Just release THAT and we'll believe you."
What about DNA evidence proving that people we have no DNA record of, being in a location where we can't provide proof of Americans being at? What about the fact that more than 75 cameras caught the side of the Pentagon where the plane hit. Out of 75 different angles, do you imply that not a single one of them could have possibly taken an image sufficient to prove a plane was there? Why not release one frame from one film to disprove us?
I don't know that there is DNA evidence as the PM editor suggested. But, if they showed you 75 different angles of a large airliner crashing into the Pentagon, would you admit there is no conspiracy, other than the one committed by the islamist terrorists?
I'd accept that the Pentagon atleast was destroyed by Islamo-Terrorists and I would be much more ready to accept that the WTC attacks were also terrorists. Yet the fact that its been almost 7 years and a video hasn't been released, I'm more than a little disturbed about the facts surrounding that terrible day.
also, we identified one of the terrorists by a tattered wallet that supposedly fell from one of the towers, landed in plain sight, identified someone as a terrorist, they checked the hotel room of the individual stated and lo-and-behold his briefcase had a sheet of paper with 19 names, pictures, and descriptions. pretty convenient, eh? I think its odd that so many of that 19 are still alive, too.
I'm definately a fan of all three of those films, and I've watched their counters(Screw Loose Change, the popular mechanics point of view), and I'm still left with questions that defy the answers suggested by the "debunkers". The original theory requires a complete disregard for physics and the original construction of the building.
With all the facts, eyewitness' statements, video footage, shady characters and their "coincidental" connections, buildings falling with demolition precision, idiots like this guy trying to cover up B.S. with more B.S. - anybody who continues to deny that this was a huge conspiracy pulled off by a very powerful organization is looking more and more idiotic - AND dishonest - with every day that goes by.
they shudda asked him 'how come larry silverstein made the order to pull out the fireman?' i may be mistaken here, plz correct me if i am, but isnt it the job of the chief fire officer to make that order.
Good point. And why would LS mention the morning evacuation and the evening building collapse in the same breath - the two events were separated by more than 6 hours.
Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act Raises Fears of New Government Crackdown on Dissent. DO NOT COMPLY! Do not sit idly by and let congress ratify this bill! FUCK EM'
Lol Im sorry I keep laughing about this...How can ANYONE confuse "it" and "them"?? Is anyone that retarded??? Especially on Live TV. Anyone who thinks "it" means "them" needs to return to elementary school english class.
I hear ya. "Pull them out" could mean evacuate, but not "pull it". According to NIST and FEMA, fire fighters were evacuated from WTC 7 at 11:30 am. I doubt that LS was mentioning the 11:30 am evacuation and the 5:20 pm collapse in the same sentence. The video clip immediately following his "pull it" statement shows WTC 7 collapsing, not being evacuated.
Well..."It" refers to a singular thing (or person). "Them" refers to more than one (This the basic use of english). How can "It" refer to multiple firefighters. Unless Silverstein has a 1st grade education, Then his intentions behind his words go without saying. Pull isn't the active word in that phrase, it's "It".
Setting up a building to be demolished doesnt take a day. It takes A VERY Long time to do. So if wtc7 was set up to be demolished, who says the other two towers weren't set up as well.
Besides he admitted on live tv "we watched the building collapse". He didn't say "And what do you know..it collapsed like we thought it would" He didn't say it like he was surprised. He KNEW it was going to fall because he gave the fucking order to "pull it". "IT" being the building.
"Pull them" ... "Pull it" Ok..so if "Pull it" means pull out firefighters, Why would larry silverstein have the authority to give orders to firefighters?? He's not employed by FDNY in any means. He had the authority to give permission to "someone" to "pull" the building. It was technically his building he insured.
Great comments. It seems most of Larry's defenders seem to be focusing on the meaning of "pull it". In other words, the best hope of absolving LS is to convince people that "pull" means "evacuate" and that "it" means "them". This has gotta be tough since he continues in the same breath to say "and then we watched the building collapse."
"Pull it" meant the operation, "Pull the fire fighting operation". This "pull it" meaning given to it by the conspiracy theorists makes no sense. If all this effort has gone into hiding an inside job, why would Silverstein admit to "pulling" the building on film?
the same way that rumsfeld said Flight 93 was shot down. it slipped. what does "pull the fire fighting operation" mean? stop the operation? what operation? the fire fighters were evacuated way before WTC7 fell. please consult a dictionary before you say that Pull is not a demolition term, because it is. the phrase "pull it" is not the term, to pull or pull down are the terms. the reason why LS said "pull it" because "it" is refering to WTC7. basically he said pull building 7.
Why would LS admit it? Because criminals are not necessarily perfect. Or smart.
Why would LS mention the evacuation (which happened in the morning according to NIST and FEMA) and the 5:20 pm collapse in the same breath? He ends the sentence with "and we watched the building collapse", followed by video of the building collapsing.
ben chertoff, a lead researcher for the popular mechanics book on the 9-11 myths is the cousin of michael chertoff, head of homeland security. if that's not vested interest, i don't know what is. watch?v=LlurmJzQmzE
OK...I don't get it..why are pictures of the outside of a building in the middle of NewYork top secret? Why does the government believe only Poplular mechanics should see it and not us? I can understand the pentagon but a building that isn't even there anymore..what can they be protecting?
cchris874, srsly you just make an idiot out of yourself. this is gettin pathetic.
if you were at least a little as smart as you think, you would be at least suspicious by now. you´re either an total idiot(which i dont think) or a fuckin Fony. what is it?
Ya I agree. They said "just trust us" about WMDs, Gulf of Tonkin, JFK investigation, Iran Contra investigation, 911/Iraq connection, Katrina rescue, Patriot act, etc. They don't deserve ANY credibility.
At one point the host says "of course you dont" when the man on the show cant answer a question. The host is intentionally asking more and more specific questions that even a 911 expert would be hardpressed to give an exact answer. And Although at a much greater scale, the
7 year old asking why analogy wasnt a false analogy, it applied to what was going on. No of course he doesnt know exact facts and figures to disprove every single ridiculous conspiracy theory
TechReviewersUSA 4 months ago
Asking someone to verify these minute reports as 100% false is absurd. September 11th was chaos. There were reports of a 5th hijacked plane (air korea i believe) which landed safely in alaska, there were reports of a bomb in the towers, there were reports of two white trucks in the city loaded with explosives, some occupants of the towers didnt even know it was hit by a plane. More likely than not, these people were trying to claim their group or associates had done this and gain notoriety
TechReviewersUSA 4 months ago
The fact that a minute is used to analyze what the term pull means is again absurd. And how can you verify that the men claiming to be hijackers werent lying? There is evidence far beyond reasonable doubt about the identity of the actual hijackers. There is video from the airport terminals of hijackers getting on the plane.
TechReviewersUSA 4 months ago
i understand where both parties are coming from (remaining objective here) but the talkshow host was addressing him as if he was the former president bush, or someone who wouldve had inside intelligence had there been some sort of conspiracy theory. And its easy to side with the radio announcer when the guest is being grilled and talked over. That being said, the "pull it" quote was absurd, its not a demo term, and why wouldnt they come up with some sort of code word had it been a conspiracy
TechReviewersUSA 4 months ago
This must be the only time I believe a theory more after someone tries to discredit it.Davin Coburn is an idiot
gavins1970 4 months ago in playlist More videos from ThoughtCrime7
PM makes a major mistake in their investigation. If there is a question that the government may be involved (even if you don't beleave they are) you can't use any evidence they give you. You have to check everything yourself, for example test the steel youself and check the original picture negitives. You can't just say "they showed us a picture" and let that be good enough. So if it's an inside job or not the "report" or story by PM holds no merit because the source of the info is in question.
cwhadley001 7 months ago
This popular mechanics douche is first cousins with Zionist, dual U.S./Israeli citizen, PNAC member Michael Chertoff who freed and sent over 100 Israeli spies back to Israel that were rounded up subsequent to 9/11.. He's a traitor to the U.S. and belongs in jail for aiding and abetting the criminals responsible for 9/11.
dankums 8 months ago
Wonder where this moron shill is now? Prolly working for the media in Japan? Nope no radiation here nope. There was radiation but it's in the evidence but that's buried under tons and tons of concrete. Can't tell me there's no concrete have you been there? No? Well, see I know what I'm talking about!
Sugamari 10 months ago
Davin Coburn is a C.I.A. front man, OBVIOUSLY!
getonid 11 months ago
After listening to this it makes me think P/M was given the task to explain the official story. If it was his job to verify the facts, he should have been able to answer these questions. His job was to investigate the DNA issue. Id he was a good reported, he would have checking into this when he did the P/M Report and had the explanation available. P/M just lost my respect.
infoseeker264 1 year ago
People! Liberalism/progressivism/neoconservatism IS a mental illness! The United States Incorporated in The District Of Columbia, which is a foreign country, is being run and managed by the mentally insane. STOP VOTING FOR THESE CRIMINALS!!!
abolishtheirs 1 year ago
Davin Coburn is a complete douche bag! He must be a liberal; instead of carrying on an intelligent conversation, when Goyette questions him on sources and credibility he likens Goyette to a 7 year old asking why. What a fuckstain!
Bigvader 1 year ago
Interviewer is excellent! Good stuff!
Hate Pop Mech,Nat Geo,Hist Ch,Colbert for there 911 truth blocking/slander.
bongojim420 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LifeRegenRevolution show me your research. Is 911 C.P. your film?
jeffmoppi 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution show me your research. Is 911 C.P. your film?
jeffmoppi 1 year ago
@jeffmoppi
Yes, also watch
THEORY OF GHOSTPLANE
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@jeffmoppi
Fact is NO planes were used on 911, the plane videos were Fake
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
The NIST report released late 2008 proves that Davin Coburn was lying about seeing some photo that was 'confidential' of the damage to WTC7. "25% of the facade scooped out". What a traitor.
If such a photo existed, then NIST would have used it in their report, and 2ndly they would have claimed that damage had something to do with the collapse of WTC7.
Anyone knows where Davin Coburn is hanging these days? Someone needs to interview him again and ask him to explain his lies before we hang him.
Focoist911 2 years ago
uh ah uh uh oh i i uh ? hu? uh uuh ?
secretwatcher100 2 years ago
Whether 9/11 was an inside job or not, at least we can all agree that popular mechanics has an agenda and are prepared to lie therefore disqualifying their hit piece. Chertoff has been caught lying and meigs told o'reilly that cell phones work perfectly fine and then in a debate with loose change on democrcay now he said "we did'nt say they worked well but they did work."
doire7 2 years ago
Popular Mechanics lied about just about everything. Where they didn't lie was when they selected 'arguments' which were not from the 9/11 Truthers but planted by the CIA so that they could be debunked.
Popular Mechanics, especially the chief editor James Meigs belong in prison. Why you think these were the only guys willing to publicly defend the Official story? You know why, cause no one else want a WANTED: DEAD OR ALIVE hanging over them in years to come the truth would out.
Focoist911 2 years ago
@Focoist911
Cross Reference this great video with these, check em out
THEORY OF GHOSTPLANE
911 TABOO
SEPTEMBER CLUES
JOHN LEAR 911
911 PASSENGERS FICTITIOUS
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@Focoist911
best hard rockin 911 truth song on here !
I DENY YOUR HOLY FOOTAGE
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@doire7
My research is that NO planes were Used !
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@doire7
My research is that NO planes were Used !
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
"he's talking about a brigade" buahaaha!! what a joke, someone must've laid some serious threats on him no doubt. thanks for posting this!
tigros999 2 years ago
A very slithery character, that devon.
AmericaFell 2 years ago
Now they have PM's debunking the Fema camps on Glenn Beck. Are they going to debunk that the Fed reserve isn't a government agency. Are they going to tell us the Fed government isn't run by corp's and bankers? America is absurd. Yet you have SO MANY PEOPLE who believe PM's as gospel. WOW.
blite13 2 years ago
the NIST report that came out in AUG 2008 disproves davin coburn and popular mechanics. they said that their were no firefighters in that building and the fire sprinklers didn't work which was the reason the buildings integrity degraded in 7 hours supposedly.
robinsl27 2 years ago
Is David Coburn a scientist or engineer?
suboreo 3 years ago
he's a zionist jewish liar.
emosdieslow 3 years ago
Davin Coburn should be put in a noose with the rest of them if the truth ever comes out!
vinnyfromnova 3 years ago 4
that was beautiful
vdasdny 3 years ago 10
charles handled that fucker perfect!!jesus this guys awsome!
shtfuk666 3 years ago 13
Daven Coburg got taken off the rounds after that. We didn't see him again. He hasn't polished his jewishness very well. The jews will just lie directly in your face even when you have the evidence in your hand staring at them. Look up "Sir Rudy admits WTC7 was fed black-op center" on YT. Shakespear wrote about it in Merchant of Venus. There are 1000s of infamous quotes about this nature of the jews. This is their last ascendancy.
Focoist911 3 years ago 3
@shtfuk666 It would have been ten times better of an interview if he had just cornered the douche and forced him to explain how iron and steel had melted.. Popular Mechanics totally skirted this issue by creating a strawman argument in which they just said.. "steel didn't have to melt for the towers to fall".. clearly this "answer" doesn't explain how and why STEEL DID MELT in ALL the buildings that collapsed. The molten steel is the smoking gun evidence that can't be explained away.
dankums 8 months ago
@dankums it didnt have to melt it had to heat up hot enough to weaken the steel so that it gives away. also expanding at the joints due to heat would cause the collapse. the molten steel seen in the building is from the firefighters cutting the beams.
debunking911DOTcom/moltensteel.htm
EpicurusIVXX 4 months ago
That guy is a bad liar!
Why do people defend this crime!?
Why aren't the real terrorists charged yet?
Why?
puffrooster 3 years ago 3
"Why do people defend this crime!?"
James Meigs and Devan Coburn of Popular Mechanics who were charged with doing the rounds on all media and spewing their lies in total defense of the official narrative are both Zionist jews, most probably with Israeli passports. The South Park hit-piece: Zionist jews Tray Parker and whatshisname. The two comedians I forgotten their names: Zionist jews. All the articles in Aussie: Zionist jews. Who did 9/11? Zionist jews.
Focoist911 3 years ago 2
Well then I understand why! Being a zionist you would have no choice but to support the attack. How else would you get the goyim to die, fight and pay for your wars and destroy your enemies!?
puffrooster 3 years ago
The elite of this Zionist mafia don't mind killing jews too. But they definitely did everything they could to make sure no non-US Israelis died on 9/11. There were 4000 Israelis working and living around WTC on 9/11. Not one died. Odigo warnings....Ah man its so obvious its boring. But the sheeple must be awakened, the sleeping giant will rise and Israel will become a place in a mythical place again.
Focoist911 3 years ago
keep speaking the truth, my friend.
emosdieslow 3 years ago
I was thinking the exact same thing before he raised the question.
Where did they get the DNA to match it with in the first place. That is a legit question in response to his answer.
Jjinn1 3 years ago 2
DNA evidence!! LOL!
stalkervision 3 years ago
"Pull it is not a demolition term"......and the Mafia also has never been proven to exist. Nudge Nudge Winky Winky say no more!!
Anticommunist22 3 years ago
Its a total lie. I went to the Controlled Demolition website and found four instances of them using the term "Pull it". And in two of them they actually used quotation marks. And they were describing the use of explosives to bring the buildings down. So he has lied on every issue in this interview. Disgusting Zionist jewish pig.
Focoist911 3 years ago 2
What a total fucking liar.......! Inside job, controlled demolition, etc etc.
nothwind 3 years ago
Love the title dude!!
DNA from the rubble is toally lol.
The silence at 1:15-1:20 tell all!
gillies24 3 years ago
Beautiful
bennybenners 3 years ago
That was awesome!
HippyInASuit 3 years ago 2
LOL
They recovered DNA from the rubble?? LOl
sure they
LOL
Let's see
exploding airplanes.dustified.buildings,
Intense heat that melted steel and they got DNA
LOL
BaNoyes 3 years ago 3
Goyette is a putz. No on ever said that 'hijacker dna' was found 'amognst the molten steel'. Also, original 'hijacker dna' was found in their hotel rooms and rental cars.
mjs28c 3 years ago
davin colbert the one he is interviewing, said they matched thier dna.. google it!
tone4624 3 years ago
then how come the brilliant man from PM didn't assert that fact (dna in hotel and cars)??
kevhead66 3 years ago
I don't know. You should ask him.
mjs28c 3 years ago
Maybe we can go out on a limb and say that Davin simply does not know the answer regarding the dna. He claims he'll get back to Goyette though. It is just frustrating because PM claims to be the authority on this topic. I mean they wrote a giant article and published a book.
kevhead66 3 years ago
mjs28c, we all expect zionist pigs like you to resort to talmudic libel.
Goyette NEVER says any such thing, it is the lying pissface Coburn that states @ 6:08 "The remains of the hyjackers who have been widely understood to have been on those planes. There was DNA evidence collected all over the place.
Then the Coburn PUNK avoids the question and runs off to THEE most laughable fraud, and says "Particularly out of the Pentagon."
You're a LIAR just like him, ok you Jew PUNK.
EscapeHatchery 3 years ago
7:00-Goyette: "Where did they get their original DNA against which to match it?"
9:00-Goyette: "Where did they get the original DNA to check it against?"
Answer: They got it from their hotel rooms, their cars, etc.
And if the hijackers are alive, then why doesn't Goyette (still a putz) - or anyone - go and interview them?
mjs28c 3 years ago
how did they know the DNA in a hotel room belonged to the hijackers when they took it? what did they match THAT with?
jeffmoppi 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The hotel room was registered to the hijackers. Their DNA was found in the room, and it was matched to DNA found in the wreckage. Bear in mind that DNA of WTC employees was also found in the wreckage. So, finding DNA in that rubble was not unlikely.
mjs28c 2 years ago
Why didn't Davin say that?
ThoughtCrime7 2 years ago 2
I don't know.
mjs28c 2 years ago
how did they know the DNA in a hotel room belonged to the hijackers? what did they match THAT with? If you match hotel room DNA to the DNA in the wreckage, and vice versa, you have nothing.
jeffmoppi 2 years ago 4
Great point.
ThoughtCrime7 2 years ago
@ThoughtCrime7 There's no way, they expect us to believe that they went through all that rubble and found all the DNA of the 19 hijackers but only left 240 pieces of steel for nist to examine. To seperate the DNA of 3000 victims from the 19 hijackers would take more than 24 hours. I'm just guessing but i would presume months but they cleaned up the area within weeks so there's no way they could have collected all the DNA.
doire7 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Again, the rooms were registered to them. They matched DNA found in the room with DNA found at the site. Don't forget, the hijackers shaved themselves the night before. "If you match hotel room DNA to the DNA in the wreckage, and vice versa, you have nothing." ??????
mjs28c 2 years ago
You might be able to prove that SOMEONE who was in that hotel room was ALSO in the WTC. That's it, and that is NOTHING in terms of matching it to the hijackers!!!!!!!!
jeffmoppi 2 years ago
The airport security video shows the hijackers getting on the plane at Logan airport.
mjs28c 2 years ago
now you're changing the subject. what does the security cam have to do with DNA evidence?
jeffmoppi 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I haven't 'changed the subject'. The DNA of the people who were registered in the hotel room was also found in the WTC wreckage. Those same people are shown boarding the plane which crashed into the WTC. People were wondering how the same DNA was found in the hotel room and the wreckage....and I've just cleared up that 'mystery'.
mjs28c 2 years ago
Yes you did change the subject. The question was, where did they get the DNA to match with the DNA found at ground zero. Answer was hotel room.Then the question was, where did they get the original DNA to match with the one in the hotel room. Then you bring up security camera. A security camera does not take DNA samples, so the question still stands. And, please, tell us the source for your claims about where DNA was found and what matches what, that means if you have a source. Thanks.
jeffmoppi 2 years ago
One more time: The DNA was takem from the room they were registered in. That DNA was then matched to DNA found in the wreckage. The occupants of that room were shown boarding the plane which later crashed into the tower. You keep asking about 'original DNA'. What original DNA are you talking about? "A security camera does not take DNA samples." Obviously! But it shows a clear link between the occupants, the plane, and the wreckage.
mjs28c 2 years ago
If they indeed matched DNA from ground0 with DNA from a hotel room, it's plausible to say that someone who was in a certain hotel room at some time was also in the WTC at one time. But how do they know this someone was the hijackers? Thousands going in and out the WTC every day, they surely recovered thousands of DNA samples from bathrooms, carpets, clothes... Why don't you name your source? Where is the studyt? If you told me your source, I wouldn't waste your time discussing this claim. thanks
jeffmoppi 2 years ago
@jeffmoppi
watch
911 CONTINUOUS PIECES
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@jeffmoppi
i think its obvious that NO planes were used
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@jeffmoppi Exactly, you're still presuming it's the hijackers. The only way you could confirm would be if you already had their DNA on file which we must presume they did'nt plus the time frame at which they confirmed their identities comes into question.
doire7 1 year ago
how did they know the DNA in a hotel room belonged to the hijackers? what did they match THAT with?
jeffmoppi 2 years ago
re: Larry Silverstein 'pull it' comment. The implication is that he was responsible for the collapse of WTC7. This further implies that he masterminded massive insurance fraud AND admitted to as much on video. Then why have the insurance companies not launched an investigation? And how is Larry - a landlord - able to convince the NYC fire department to collapse a building? And how, ethen, did the NYC fire department trigger the collapse?
mjs28c 3 years ago
re: Larry Silverstein taking an 'enormous' insurance policy. He had to. You cannot own/operate any structure in NYC (or in probably any city) without insurance. Nothing odd or conspiratorial about this.
mjs28c 3 years ago
If any of you are one of the remaining 18% that still believes Bush had nothing to do with 9/11 then spend a few days here: 911docs dot net ... Enough said
Worried01 3 years ago
This generation that never had to fight for for this country has their heads so far up their asses that it's coming all the way back out of their throats and looking back at me and it is disgusting!
They pulled the building and everybody knows it. The building needed to go. It's a bullshid argument. Where's all this leading? George Bush did it? My gosh people are really mad about that election.
7 Hijackers all came forward? Bullshit, 1 report in the BBC says your gay, I guess it's true.
mynameisjohnb 3 years ago
this coburn guys really deserves to get fucked up for this. im really pissed off and i want to hurt that lying piece of shit badly
KillWoundedEatDead 3 years ago
Ya know, that was really satisfying having a random caller stump a guy from a national magazine on the air. It's nice to see a charismatic host show who the unbelievable conspiracists really are for once.
6079 4 years ago 3
Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies - you have uncovered them all and the only people who defend these lies work for the American Government.
updougdown 4 years ago 2
this coburn guy is a piece of shit minion liar idiot fuck head asshole.
KeithTruth 4 years ago 3
Attention - newspeak bulletin:
"Pull" now means "Evacuate".
Example 1: "Larry evacuated off a great insurance scam."
Example 2: "Anyone who tells you WTC 7 wasn't blown up is evacuating your leg."
Example 3: "The PBS documentary 'America Rebuilds' featuring Larry Silverstein was evacuated off the shelves."
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago 4
According to the FEMA report regarding September 11th, there were "no manual firefighting actions" occuring inside building 7.
willsfarm 3 years ago
very witty! lol
DATCH73 2 years ago
Does the usa have DNA samples to compare against all Al Queda?
Sounds like this guy is trippin'.
Real engineers are idiots in the usa but not in the rest of the world and then guys like this are 'experts'. What a load of horse shit!
jetplane2006 4 years ago 3
Pull my knob! Pull it!
jetplane2006 4 years ago
Ameriqaeda, land of the sheeple!
bezgin 4 years ago 3
Thats it. I'm getting my fucking guns out and dusting them off. Kids get in the car, we're going to Washington.
Focoist911 4 years ago 2
PM have been busted lying over and over. Where are the fucing photos of WTC7's north side? Oh, the NYPD has them? And itsok to see footage of our brothers and sisters jumping to their deaths but not of the damage to a fucking building? Thats it. I'm getting my gun.
Focoist911 4 years ago 4
It is creepy to listin to Coburn sell his party line bullshit. He is just a young guy, did he get a big promotion? Did his master say,well done son! with a pat on the back?
Sending out guys that sound like any lying teenager only hurts the official story and deepens public suspision.
bigeffendeal 4 years ago
DNA evidence.... HAHAHAHA..... Coburn is full of shit.
bofors7715 4 years ago 2
Coburn is a jew isn't he? ANd that James Miegs is a jew too eh?
Focoist911 4 years ago
Why the fuck hasnt Bush the retard been Impeached??
homeborn 4 years ago 6
"Coburn was the senior editor and fact checker". i have seen jr hi kids on jeopardy who r more accurate & more logical than this pos. why did this idiot go on air trying 2 defend pm's bs? his answers werent very convincing nor factually correct. plus he couldnt disguise his frustration & animosity like the other pm douchebags do publically. next time pm better send one of their heavyweights, who will still wont have any answers, but is better at propaganda than this loser.
shitstinx 4 years ago
how can so much importance be placed upon "pull it". When interviewed silverstein said he was told by the fire chief that he didn't think he could save the building... he said pull it. I don't know how that is any evidence at all... it can be used for either argument depending on how you personally interpret it. And if thats not bad enough some guy calls in to give the dictionary definition... People say things all the time that don't follow the dictionary definition to a tea.
rxhysen 4 years ago
"We made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse" followed by video of the collapse (5:20 pm). The building had already been evacuated by 11 am
(NIST, FEMA). Anyone who says he meant evacuate is evacuating your leg.
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
explain to me how a building that size can be wired for demolition... which takes months mind you... can be done without anyone knowing... further more there is no evidence that there were any explosives at the scene.. do you really think a conspiracy of this magnitude that would have to involve as many thousands of people as it did, could be kept secret... I mean they couldn't keep Watergate a secret or clinton gettin his dick sucked...
rxhysen 4 years ago
Any building can be wired for demo. Who said it was done that day? They did it during the unprecedented power downs days and weeks before. Secrets kept from you: who really killed Kennedy, Tonkin lie, war in Indonesia, Manhatten Project, many more. Do you really think the corporate media would tell YOU anything? They lie all the time and fools believe it.
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
Ditto. The dumbing down of America. Read:
A Nation of Sheep by, Judge Andrew Napolitano.
WAKE UP AMERICA!!
JohnQPublixx 4 years ago
in the US its far more evil to get your cock sucked than murder 3000 of your own citizens
homeborn 4 years ago
lol - ya i'm kinda random. cheers!
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
thanks! great references.
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
hearing this little vomit bag squirm gives me a little something at christmass.
ezranpee 4 years ago 2
make ascertions without evidence .when saked for evidence attack the questioners motives. 'shills handbook'
ezranpee 4 years ago 2
Oh yeah or the different approach. First, deny everything (the term "pull it" used in demolition). Second, admit that some of the claimed information is, after all, true (the term "pull it" is used when a building is brought down with a cable). Then third, when asked for something else say something completely irrelevant to the question (term "pull it" was said in a contex of "team").
Apjooz 4 years ago 2
"All" the demolition evidence can be ignored with the excuse "Popular Mechanics said..."
Media Lying is an idea that already exists in our (their)minds, so even if laughed at--is not discarded.
Estamio 4 years ago
I don't want to spend hours of stress doing research--I just want an excuse to relax and laugh at conspiracies; the Popular Mechanics book allows me to do just that.
Estamio 4 years ago
u wanna laff at conspiracies?
i got a cracker for u...zeitgeist: the federal reserve, parts 1 - 5.
U love laffin at conspiracies?, go watch this, it'll soon wipe the smile of ur face. seriously go and watch it, ull have all ur reasons behind the 911 conspiracy rite there in under half n hour too.
OiCh33ky 4 years ago
Zeitgeist is a great film, but the religious into' is not substantiated in "myth" books; Egypt sun God is actually "RA"....
A better into' film is Genghis6199 "911 A Fake Odyssey"; it is a no-planer, but is haunting because of that.
Estamio 4 years ago
blind acceptance is a sign for stupid fools to stand in line,
america you slauterd your own for oil
realitybites67 4 years ago
realitybites67, so what's your proof that hasn't already been debunked, and isn't just your opinion?
srstacy 4 years ago
government sheep workin over time this week
AUSTDOG1 4 years ago
Wow, lots of anti-truther comments on all my videos in the last 2 days. Interesting trend.
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
My brothers a firefighter. He has NEVER heard of that term before. PULL IT. what a fucking load of shit.
mase15 4 years ago
My neighbor is a fire fighter and he says 9/11 was an inside job.
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
After listening to this, Popular Mechanics has now officially been discredited of any positive effect it could've possibly had into solving this great mystery. Thank you, Charles Goyette for asking real questions, and thank you Davin Coburn for not being able to even remotely address the questions. It enlightens us all on how brilliant the corporate world is in its attempts to discredit the nation.
Baowulf00 4 years ago 2
No. This is proof that conspiracy believers will never accept that their was no conspiracy because it's impossible to answer every question with a satisfactory answer. For believers, it's a self-reinforcing paranoid delusion. "Why haven't we been shown the secret 240fps digital video recording of the plane hitting the Pentagon? Just release THAT and we'll believe you."
yegreskin 4 years ago
What about DNA evidence proving that people we have no DNA record of, being in a location where we can't provide proof of Americans being at? What about the fact that more than 75 cameras caught the side of the Pentagon where the plane hit. Out of 75 different angles, do you imply that not a single one of them could have possibly taken an image sufficient to prove a plane was there? Why not release one frame from one film to disprove us?
Baowulf00 4 years ago 3
I don't know that there is DNA evidence as the PM editor suggested. But, if they showed you 75 different angles of a large airliner crashing into the Pentagon, would you admit there is no conspiracy, other than the one committed by the islamist terrorists?
yegreskin 4 years ago
I'd settle for one clear video. Why not show it? We saw video of the towers over and over. Why not realease Pentagon videos? National security?
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
I'd accept that the Pentagon atleast was destroyed by Islamo-Terrorists and I would be much more ready to accept that the WTC attacks were also terrorists. Yet the fact that its been almost 7 years and a video hasn't been released, I'm more than a little disturbed about the facts surrounding that terrible day.
Baowulf00 4 years ago 2
also, we identified one of the terrorists by a tattered wallet that supposedly fell from one of the towers, landed in plain sight, identified someone as a terrorist, they checked the hotel room of the individual stated and lo-and-behold his briefcase had a sheet of paper with 19 names, pictures, and descriptions. pretty convenient, eh? I think its odd that so many of that 19 are still alive, too.
Baowulf00 4 years ago 4
Absolutley not, all that would prove is that there was a PLANE that crashed into the Pentagon. Next question.
Aaaden 4 years ago
Good point. Thank you, Aaaden.
Baowulf00 4 years ago
Watch Terror Storm, Loose Change, Iraq for Sale and Engame.
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
Amen!
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
I'm definately a fan of all three of those films, and I've watched their counters(Screw Loose Change, the popular mechanics point of view), and I'm still left with questions that defy the answers suggested by the "debunkers". The original theory requires a complete disregard for physics and the original construction of the building.
Baowulf00 4 years ago
With all the facts, eyewitness' statements, video footage, shady characters and their "coincidental" connections, buildings falling with demolition precision, idiots like this guy trying to cover up B.S. with more B.S. - anybody who continues to deny that this was a huge conspiracy pulled off by a very powerful organization is looking more and more idiotic - AND dishonest - with every day that goes by.
ParadoxianGiant 4 years ago
they shudda asked him 'how come larry silverstein made the order to pull out the fireman?' i may be mistaken here, plz correct me if i am, but isnt it the job of the chief fire officer to make that order.
OiCh33ky 4 years ago
Good point. And why would LS mention the morning evacuation and the evening building collapse in the same breath - the two events were separated by more than 6 hours.
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
LOL how would you frame it
this is intense disaster reel
that guy is busted!!!!
pawned at a pawnshop
basterdpeople 4 years ago 2
errr ummm errr - am i qualified to be a researcher for popular mechanics now?
AUSTDOG1 4 years ago 2
Amazing
slingkey 4 years ago 2
This is exactly why I no longer buy any Hearst Publishing products. I'd encourage everyone to do the same.
hammmeggs 4 years ago 2
This is AWESOME.
DABIGRAGU1 4 years ago
ELITES WE KNOW WHO YOU ARE. To Arms, To Arms!
Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act Raises Fears of New Government Crackdown on Dissent. DO NOT COMPLY! Do not sit idly by and let congress ratify this bill! FUCK EM'
chewbaca1989 4 years ago 4
Popular Mechanics toilet paper.
chewbaca1989 4 years ago 2
Davin Coburn is on one someone's payroll
robty74 4 years ago 3
Did he ever get back to Charles about the "overwhelming "DNA evidence?
Hmm...
sandman4224 4 years ago 3
STUCK HIM! If you are not trained in dodging questions you really look bad when you don't have the answer. Ummmm Did the book still SELL?
fake2 4 years ago 3
Lol Im sorry I keep laughing about this...How can ANYONE confuse "it" and "them"?? Is anyone that retarded??? Especially on Live TV. Anyone who thinks "it" means "them" needs to return to elementary school english class.
infections 4 years ago
I hear ya. "Pull them out" could mean evacuate, but not "pull it". According to NIST and FEMA, fire fighters were evacuated from WTC 7 at 11:30 am. I doubt that LS was mentioning the 11:30 am evacuation and the 5:20 pm collapse in the same sentence. The video clip immediately following his "pull it" statement shows WTC 7 collapsing, not being evacuated.
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
Well..."It" refers to a singular thing (or person). "Them" refers to more than one (This the basic use of english). How can "It" refer to multiple firefighters. Unless Silverstein has a 1st grade education, Then his intentions behind his words go without saying. Pull isn't the active word in that phrase, it's "It".
infections 4 years ago 3
Setting up a building to be demolished doesnt take a day. It takes A VERY Long time to do. So if wtc7 was set up to be demolished, who says the other two towers weren't set up as well.
infections 4 years ago
Besides he admitted on live tv "we watched the building collapse". He didn't say "And what do you know..it collapsed like we thought it would" He didn't say it like he was surprised. He KNEW it was going to fall because he gave the fucking order to "pull it". "IT" being the building.
infections 4 years ago 3
"Pull them" ... "Pull it" Ok..so if "Pull it" means pull out firefighters, Why would larry silverstein have the authority to give orders to firefighters?? He's not employed by FDNY in any means. He had the authority to give permission to "someone" to "pull" the building. It was technically his building he insured.
infections 4 years ago 2
Great comments. It seems most of Larry's defenders seem to be focusing on the meaning of "pull it". In other words, the best hope of absolving LS is to convince people that "pull" means "evacuate" and that "it" means "them". This has gotta be tough since he continues in the same breath to say "and then we watched the building collapse."
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
"Pull it" meant the operation, "Pull the fire fighting operation". This "pull it" meaning given to it by the conspiracy theorists makes no sense. If all this effort has gone into hiding an inside job, why would Silverstein admit to "pulling" the building on film?
srstacy 4 years ago
the same way that rumsfeld said Flight 93 was shot down. it slipped. what does "pull the fire fighting operation" mean? stop the operation? what operation? the fire fighters were evacuated way before WTC7 fell. please consult a dictionary before you say that Pull is not a demolition term, because it is. the phrase "pull it" is not the term, to pull or pull down are the terms. the reason why LS said "pull it" because "it" is refering to WTC7. basically he said pull building 7.
lofy63 4 years ago 3
lofy63, Thanks for your opinion, which is all it is.
srstacy 4 years ago
Why would LS admit it? Because criminals are not necessarily perfect. Or smart.
Why would LS mention the evacuation (which happened in the morning according to NIST and FEMA) and the 5:20 pm collapse in the same breath? He ends the sentence with "and we watched the building collapse", followed by video of the building collapsing.
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
Yeah, he just happened to slip in a filmed interview. Hahahahahahahaha
srstacy 4 years ago
the boy got owned!
supastudmuffen 4 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
ben chertoff, a lead researcher for the popular mechanics book on the 9-11 myths is the cousin of michael chertoff, head of homeland security. if that's not vested interest, i don't know what is. watch?v=LlurmJzQmzE
sebensoph 4 years ago
They matched the dna vs what? That was a great point
xmm2006mm2006x 4 years ago 3
OK...I don't get it..why are pictures of the outside of a building in the middle of NewYork top secret? Why does the government believe only Poplular mechanics should see it and not us? I can understand the pentagon but a building that isn't even there anymore..what can they be protecting?
DelinquentFaith 4 years ago 5
what can they be protecting?
1. David Rockefeller
2. Bush Crime Family & Associates
kevgrim 4 years ago 3
Davin Coburn doesn't even have a degree (not even in Journalism).
He's listed as one of Popular Mechanic's "experts" and their "Science Editor".
He worked as a SPORT'S WRITER at a small daily newspaper in Pa, prior to PM's hiring him.
He's also a writer for Sport's Illustrated now. One of his best articles is titled:
"The Woes of Being a Pro Sport's Mascot".
He's been cancelling all interviews and debates since he embarrassed himself in this video's interview.
ErikaScott21 4 years ago 5
cchris874, srsly you just make an idiot out of yourself. this is gettin pathetic.
if you were at least a little as smart as you think, you would be at least suspicious by now. you´re either an total idiot(which i dont think) or a fuckin Fony. what is it?
xaninha123 4 years ago
Coburn is a mendacious shill and neocon spinmeister, at best.
Vierotchka 4 years ago
Not forgetting the fact that some 7 or 8 of the alleged terrorist hijackers are alive and well today...
Vierotchka 4 years ago
Ya I agree. They said "just trust us" about WMDs, Gulf of Tonkin, JFK investigation, Iran Contra investigation, 911/Iraq connection, Katrina rescue, Patriot act, etc. They don't deserve ANY credibility.
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
Thanks for sharing! Peace!2U&Yours!
PiTrinam 4 years ago 2
So much alleged 'evidence' we're not allowed to see - ever wonder why?
"Just trust us!"
That's what they said about Saddam's links to 9/11 and Iraq's nuclear arsenal.
proudfootz 4 years ago 4
DNA - lol. Nice try Davin.
Jen1001001 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"DNA - lol. Nice try Davin"
Except that he's right.
cchris874 4 years ago
Hearst = Yellow Journalism = Popular Mechanics = cover up
INSIDE JOB!
615ocean 4 years ago 2
Absolutely right my friend.
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago