WTC7 was ommitted from the 9/11 report... thats very curious... I dont think its out of the realm of possibility for someone to see an opportunity to take advantage of the chaos that day. WTC7 had one building in between it and the twin towers, that building was unharmed. There were also IRS, CIA, and emergency management offices contained in that building.
she did back it up... she stated a fact that WTC 7 is the first steel building to collapse by fire. WTC 7 collapsed perfectly in on itself. Connect the dots people...
Yeah, but why fly planes into WTC1 and WTC2 and then blow up 7 with explosives? How does the accepted explanation - that structural damage from the other two buildings falling caused WTC7 to fall - not make more sense?
WTC7 was ommitted from the 9/11 report... thats very curious... I dont think its out of the realm of possibility for someone to see an opportunity to take advantage of the chaos that day. WTC7 had one building in between it and the twin towers, that building was unharmed. There were also IRS, CIA, and emergency management offices contained in that building.
allileoop 4 years ago
she did back it up... she stated a fact that WTC 7 is the first steel building to collapse by fire. WTC 7 collapsed perfectly in on itself. Connect the dots people...
spudea 4 years ago
Yeah, but why fly planes into WTC1 and WTC2 and then blow up 7 with explosives? How does the accepted explanation - that structural damage from the other two buildings falling caused WTC7 to fall - not make more sense?
IncredibleGoliath 4 years ago
rosie is completely wrong. popular mechanics already disproved this theory. the fire doesnt need to melt steel it just needs to weaken it.
shiznaz17 4 years ago