I have no idea what's a penalty or what's suspendible in hockey any more. I figure they use lottery balls for suspensions and just flat out make up penalties now.
Absolutly nothing wrong with that call, he's in the paint and when your that type of player who rides the fine line as much as he can he deserves even the closest call against him. If d-men aren't allowed to touch guys in front of the net anymore than I don't feel bad for terrible players like Holmstrom who made a career out of the new rule having close calls go against him
@coop08 holmstrom isnt a terrible player lets see you go night in and night out standing in front of taking a beating, like he does. Also he has some real nice reflexes and tips the puck in. He also makes the goalie frustrated so he doesnt make saves like he usually would. stop hating on players, because he isnt on your team. you must be a penguin fan.
@22prince22billups1 Hahaha takes a beating my ass, this isn't the old NHL anymore where players actually had to pay for standing in front of the net, D-men going into corners take more of a beating now than someone standing in front of the net. He is a terrible skater compared to NHL standards. The new rules made it possible for someone who has a "tipping" ability to have that much of an impact in a game which is sad. I'm not a Penguin fan just a true hockey fan.
@coop08 if you were a ture hockey fan you would respect holmstrom. yes he still takes a beating infront of the net night in and out, just look at some of his vids on yt, true hockey fan BULLSHIT
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You Detroit fans are some of the most embarrassing, spoiled, whiny homers on the planet. Any call against you is "bullshit," according to your pretzel logic.
This was a great call. Contact in the crease, therefore, no goal for goalie interference. It's not like NBC's color commentators are the pinnacle of hockey knowledge. The refs obviously disagreed, but that's because there's a CONSPIRACY! YEAH!
I don't need to know the rule book, Holmstrom did not interfere with Giguere's ability to make a save. The Red Wings scored a goal exactly like this last night, on top of countless more in between the one in this vid and the one last night that are exactly the same and they don't get called off. Except, on occasion, when they do, because the refs fuck up. They fucked up, this was a good goal.
that is a sketchy call, i think the way the Ref called no goal cuz of Hol;mstrom in the crease...but Jiggy did move forward and he initiated the contact...so it could go either way
the ref called no goal because holmstrom interfered with giguere in the crease. he is not allowed to make ANY contact with the goalie if the goalie is in the crease
It actually doesn't matter in this situation. Holmstrom had his feet in the crease and Giguere tried to come out to challenge the puck. In the rulebook, it says that the goalie has the opportunity to make a play on the puck.
while i do play goal and understand what youre trying to say, youre not getting it across because O'Halloran couldn't of been impeding giguere because.......HES A REF!!! fucktard read the fucking description before you start talking out of your ass
watch it again...he had both feet in the top of the crease keeping the goalie from getting to the top of the crease and getting the angle. anywhere that is a crease violation and the goale will not stand.
see its calls like that.....i mean if the goal would have been allowed and wings would have came back and won the game the ducks might not even be in the playoffs right now..that extra one point they got allowed them the 8th seed instead of nashville
Refs all over the NHL have been doing this to the players. I was watching this game when it happened and I nearly fell my seat when I saw the call. Just today Aaron Downey got hit from behind from Peterson, full speed, of Buffalo, Downey' s face inches from the boards, but did the ref call it? nope, instead Downey got up and Peterson instigated for a fight. Of course being the bitch, the Ref, called Downey for roughing. Are you f***ing kidding me? The NHL needs to take there Refs back to school!
This lead to about an 8 game losing streak save for a 3-0 shutout against Colorado. Holstrom made no contact with Giguere, Giguere made contact with Holstrom. Homer was actually moving forward toward the shot, not back toward the goal, at the time of the contact and goal.
Why did you rip this video off of my account? I captured this with my TV tuner card and uploaded within minutes of the end of the game. Are you going to tell me that you captured the same video and cut it to the exact same length in time?
Maybe you should watch every game played against Philadelphia. Any game i've seen with the Flyers playing has been bad officiating especially in the Habs playoff series.
I know why they made this call. It is because the ref had realized he made a bad penalty call on Beauchimen for tripping. Coming from a Ducks fan. That goal looked clean to me.
horrible call. as the announcer states giguere was coming out to make the save. holmstrom did not interfere with giguere's ability to make the save, therefore it should not be interference. blown call by the refs all the way. if we were talking the old rules where a foot in the crease means interference you have a case, but holmstrom has just as much right to that spot on the ice as anyone else.
I have no idea what's a penalty or what's suspendible in hockey any more. I figure they use lottery balls for suspensions and just flat out make up penalties now.
skydome29 7 months ago
Fuck you O'Halloran! You have fucked us over so much. Its not the Red Wings fault you got shot in the arm in Detroit all those years ago!
jc790 8 months ago
Actualy what the fuck is this shit.... watch a game from 2001 there would be nine thousand nine hundred and forty two, goalie interference penalties
K1NGofCRAZY 8 months ago
ohalloran is the shittest ref in the NHL
kylebaja123 1 year ago 7
not sure about 2008 but now that would be a no goal and no one would complain
Gamer9678 1 year ago
Red Wings are BULL POOP!!!!!
sportsguruisme 1 year ago
Rd Wings are BULL POOP!!!!!
sportsguruisme 1 year ago
Absolutly nothing wrong with that call, he's in the paint and when your that type of player who rides the fine line as much as he can he deserves even the closest call against him. If d-men aren't allowed to touch guys in front of the net anymore than I don't feel bad for terrible players like Holmstrom who made a career out of the new rule having close calls go against him
coop08 1 year ago
@coop08 holmstrom isnt a terrible player lets see you go night in and night out standing in front of taking a beating, like he does. Also he has some real nice reflexes and tips the puck in. He also makes the goalie frustrated so he doesnt make saves like he usually would. stop hating on players, because he isnt on your team. you must be a penguin fan.
22prince22billups1 1 year ago 3
@22prince22billups1 Hahaha takes a beating my ass, this isn't the old NHL anymore where players actually had to pay for standing in front of the net, D-men going into corners take more of a beating now than someone standing in front of the net. He is a terrible skater compared to NHL standards. The new rules made it possible for someone who has a "tipping" ability to have that much of an impact in a game which is sad. I'm not a Penguin fan just a true hockey fan.
coop08 1 year ago
@coop08 if you were a ture hockey fan you would respect holmstrom. yes he still takes a beating infront of the net night in and out, just look at some of his vids on yt, true hockey fan BULLSHIT
22prince22billups1 1 year ago 3
usually i hate Refs, here though, they got the call right.
xAxiom720x 1 year ago
Gigeure "thank god i sucked the refs dick before the game"
randomraper 1 year ago 4
If the NHL was strict on bad calls, 90% of the referees would lose their job by going against Detroit
unreal103 1 year ago
GOAL!!!!! U SUK REF HOLMSTROM WASNT IN THE CREASE!!
breakoutrulz 1 year ago
what was the reason
ilovemyfaimly 1 year ago
i think that was a goal and im a hawks fan i hate detroit
sutishman 1 year ago
NHL OR NBA HELP ME OUT GUYS!!!!!
berishajrb 1 year ago
it seems like the wings get robbed of goals a lot
eaglesgoalie30 1 year ago 21
actually he called no goal because the ref lost sight of puck.thats y reply should be use more effective.
p3t302 1 year ago
wow, the nhl really hates the detroit franchise dont they?
MakaveliTheDon96 1 year ago
who cares the red wings still won the Stanley cup that year
TheLeb123leb 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You Detroit fans are some of the most embarrassing, spoiled, whiny homers on the planet. Any call against you is "bullshit," according to your pretzel logic.
This was a great call. Contact in the crease, therefore, no goal for goalie interference. It's not like NBC's color commentators are the pinnacle of hockey knowledge. The refs obviously disagreed, but that's because there's a CONSPIRACY! YEAH!
DO YOU NOT SEE HOW STUPID YOU ALL ARE?!
WithExtremePrejudice 2 years ago
There was no contact in this crease, idiot.
darkphoenix2 2 years ago
@darkphoenix2
you are a moron. get a rule book and read it. until you read the rule book and know the rule you shouldn't make any judgment on a call.
GreenNeonDriver 1 year ago
I don't need to know the rule book, Holmstrom did not interfere with Giguere's ability to make a save. The Red Wings scored a goal exactly like this last night, on top of countless more in between the one in this vid and the one last night that are exactly the same and they don't get called off. Except, on occasion, when they do, because the refs fuck up. They fucked up, this was a good goal.
darkphoenix2 1 year ago
go kiss js gigure ass you spoiled brat.
penssuck87blows 2 years ago
do you not see how much of a stupid piece of shit your whole rat sound.
penssuck87blows 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the wings are fucking bitches you detroit fans are embarassing, you live in north america and you cheer for team sweden
AnaheimDucks39 2 years ago
your fuck face duckers are embarrasing moron.
penssuck87blows 2 years ago
that is a sketchy call, i think the way the Ref called no goal cuz of Hol;mstrom in the crease...but Jiggy did move forward and he initiated the contact...so it could go either way
Detpodami 2 years ago
the ref called no goal because holmstrom interfered with giguere in the crease. he is not allowed to make ANY contact with the goalie if the goalie is in the crease
Knuckleball91 2 years ago
hey im a Ducks fan,,,but Giguere initiated the contact
Detpodami 2 years ago 5
It actually doesn't matter in this situation. Holmstrom had his feet in the crease and Giguere tried to come out to challenge the puck. In the rulebook, it says that the goalie has the opportunity to make a play on the puck.
xxgt465xx 2 years ago
His foot was on the line and the goaltender was not unable to make an attempt to make the save.
Should be a good goal.
thegarbinator 1 year ago
@thegarbinator
have you ever played goal. if you have, you can't honestly say that what O'Halloran did was not impeding Giguere.
GreenNeonDriver 1 year ago
while i do play goal and understand what youre trying to say, youre not getting it across because O'Halloran couldn't of been impeding giguere because.......HES A REF!!! fucktard read the fucking description before you start talking out of your ass
spartan934 1 year ago
no interference. learn hockey please.
bishoppx 1 year ago
ok so since he wasn't in the crease it should've been a goal
waltb1684 1 year ago
@waltb1684
watch it again...he had both feet in the top of the crease keeping the goalie from getting to the top of the crease and getting the angle. anywhere that is a crease violation and the goale will not stand.
GreenNeonDriver 1 year ago
see its calls like that.....i mean if the goal would have been allowed and wings would have came back and won the game the ducks might not even be in the playoffs right now..that extra one point they got allowed them the 8th seed instead of nashville
theCrashDrummer 2 years ago
All I can say is that until you put a ref sweater on, your just a bum.
brasszebra 2 years ago 2
hate to see these calls especially in a tight game, refs are controlling the game to much now
cindycrosby 3 years ago 18
giguere bumped into him! horrible call!
aaron1210 3 years ago 2
Refs all over the NHL have been doing this to the players. I was watching this game when it happened and I nearly fell my seat when I saw the call. Just today Aaron Downey got hit from behind from Peterson, full speed, of Buffalo, Downey' s face inches from the boards, but did the ref call it? nope, instead Downey got up and Peterson instigated for a fight. Of course being the bitch, the Ref, called Downey for roughing. Are you f***ing kidding me? The NHL needs to take there Refs back to school!
Demiwoody 3 years ago 3
This lead to about an 8 game losing streak save for a 3-0 shutout against Colorado. Holstrom made no contact with Giguere, Giguere made contact with Holstrom. Homer was actually moving forward toward the shot, not back toward the goal, at the time of the contact and goal.
IvataNoku 3 years ago
btw whats the song hey play rigt after the disallowed goal?
Icedoggy924 3 years ago
that should have been a goal but the goal in game 7 of the caps-flyers shouldnt have been that was interference not this bs
Icedoggy924 3 years ago
Why did you rip this video off of my account? I captured this with my TV tuner card and uploaded within minutes of the end of the game. Are you going to tell me that you captured the same video and cut it to the exact same length in time?
HerrBodezimmer 3 years ago
NO GOAL
JIGGY FTW
BITCHES
GabeIsTheName 3 years ago
i say O halooran can suck it BITCH
plushbear96 3 years ago
I'm a Wings fan, but that was the right call. Holmstrom was in the crease and made contact with Giguere. No goal
Danger173 3 years ago
I'm a Wings fan, but that was the right call. Holmstrem was in the crease and made contact with Giguere. No goal
Danger173 3 years ago
No goal. The Red Wings player was in the crease and making contact. The announcers are full of it here. Clearly NO GOAL.
darkstar7646 3 years ago
and u clearly have NO DICK if u agree with that ref
plushbear96 3 years ago
Judging from that comment, I can "clearly" type you're a dumbass.
paustn31634 3 years ago
Pretty weak when Giguere makes contact with him.
thegarbinator 3 years ago
O'Hallaran struck again tonight against dallas as well.
Fire that prick.
nonplus86 3 years ago
Great call! Player IS inside goal area.
janozbananoz 3 years ago
umm, last time I checked this wasn't 1999.
fastba11specia1 3 years ago
how bout u suck it this was the worst call ever
plushbear96 3 years ago
Maybe you should watch every game played against Philadelphia. Any game i've seen with the Flyers playing has been bad officiating especially in the Habs playoff series.
Scjrd91 3 years ago
i think its because the NHL wants their image to be clean and the Flyers are the opposite. Let's GO FLYERS!!!
bdomsice 3 years ago
Now if Homer had intentionally bumped him, I can see that being called no goal but wow what a load of crap.
kobraf150 3 years ago
that was the worst call ever i wtch that game and i was pissed off when they called it off REDWINGS RULE THERE GOING ALL THE WAY
ohyeah11222 3 years ago
I hate the Wings, but I don't think that should have been called. He was just barely in the crease, but it was marginal...
coolneil18 3 years ago
AWFUL call.
I can't stand NHL Officiating. Something has to be done about after the season.
jc729 3 years ago
Great call. LETS GO DUCKS!
bruceleedisciple 3 years ago
Great call?
And now the ducks are in the golf course, is it that GREAT?
GO WINGS, lame call if you ask me
DiddyRulesSince86 3 years ago
Dan O'Halloran sucks.
Sharkjumpers 3 years ago
Comment removed
ah46567 3 years ago
I know why they made this call. It is because the ref had realized he made a bad penalty call on Beauchimen for tripping. Coming from a Ducks fan. That goal looked clean to me.
Anaheimfanjohn 4 years ago
The refs were horrendous the entire game. This just capped it of.
rwingslsoccerc 4 years ago
horrible call. as the announcer states giguere was coming out to make the save. holmstrom did not interfere with giguere's ability to make the save, therefore it should not be interference. blown call by the refs all the way. if we were talking the old rules where a foot in the crease means interference you have a case, but holmstrom has just as much right to that spot on the ice as anyone else.
ak3746 4 years ago
That was BS!
sccrdd483 4 years ago
That was technically the correct call..
CAScreaminDude 4 years ago