Well, Jesus taught "turn the other cheek". Dawkins doesn't really address how that "finishes first" in the a world of survival of the fittest. The reason he can't is because the teacher of that phrase didn't finish first here either. He was crucified. He said the world will hate you (if you follow his teachings)... the sooner we understand what a bad state we're in the better. Anyway- my main point was that this lecture by Dawkins doesn't prove evolutionary love. Love is from God.
I don't see how mutually beneficial behavior is "altruistic behavior". This doesn't address the possibility of "turning the other cheek" or "loving your enemy". Why would anyone believe much less teach these latter ideas in a world of mutually benefiting species or individuals?
1: unselfish regard for or devotion to the welfare of others
2: behavior by an animal that is not beneficial to or may be harmful to itself but that benefits others of its species
Seems Webster's Dictionary dosent disagree. Why would people teach turn your cheek or love your neighboer? They arent teaching that. Those are just catchphases that embody a deeper sentiment. Even if they are teaching them ... do we do them?
@gumme1234 my sarcasm is so subtle. since his position is of evolution, i was sracsticaly proposing that a bee gene infected the apes he so wants humans to descend from. my proposal is not a serious one- co-operation does not exist if the selfish gene of both groups doesnt meet a natural need. circle conversations i find he has
@koyima psychological content is primitive in thinking when applied to humans . it is however early works of darwin. nevertheless his topic has nothing to do with the origin of creation. hes just observing animal tendencies of the ego. here we go again with razy americans that cant coverse with out talking of god whether in bad or good. forget about god-
i guess the selfish gene is typical of animal behavior. maybe this wwas the need of sciptures. to elevate yourslef from your ego? i dunno- he certainly reduces humans attributes to be greater and accepts we cant evolve above our "genes"
@cortez666666 "he was younger but his voice is the same ! unique voice though !" Without it, his crusade for macro evolution wouldn´t have been so successful. He could probably say anything, and convince you.
"- Hi, you know me, I just want to inform you that I´m having your wife at dinner at my château this evening. Hope you understand."
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system to suit their Evo-Hoax agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need religion, hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important, qualitative differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption.
Homosexual activists, with complete support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims and martyrs; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
Topics: The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
or
figure4etc3.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
@Nashhinton you are injecting your ideals into the wrong arena. If you want a 'kindly' atheist to speak to, feel free to PM me. I come from a family with Muslims and Christians and I assure the people here that the majority of them look at religion as something personal. It's peaceful for them and it works for some people. Your assumptions about atheist and muslims are very wrong.
@Nashhinton wtf? you're completely 180 degrees WRONG. i don't know what rock you're living under or what books about what big assholes athiests are you've got your nose in, but you can't see reality very clearly. athiests are the people who NEVER speak up about their straight-forward belief, that's why dawkins is trying to get athiests to be more out there. but stupidity and ignorance is obviously a family traight for you. Fuck Head.
@shcnoozlebop Whatever point you were trying to make has been ruined by your unnecessarily violent insults and name-calling. Your ignorance and stupidity is shown by acting like a jerk in response to a stright-foward opinion. Why would you call someone you don't even know a "fuck head"? That pointless insult shows me that you are a rude and thoughtless person and your point is utterly worthless because of it. You are just a troll.
Richard Dawkins is smart, but he has obviously been affected by liberalism/political correctness. He should have studied the policies of the British National Front, before making inaccurate statements against it. Very silly thing to do for such a smart man. It is also a shame that Richard Dawkins does not have the courage to be a consistent evolutionist, and acknowledge that there is no place for a universal morality in a world without a god. God is dead - long live Nature, and MIGHT IS RIGHT!
@NIETZSCHEAN14 would nietzsche want you to copy and paste his philosophy(complete joke with a slight amount of seriousness). i agree with you there i no universal/objective morality. that does not make might right. one can use nietzsche to disprove nietzsche. there is no universal so therefore might is not always right. nietzsche wants us to disprove him.
@AtheistAnarchoRudi. "MIGHT IS RIGHT" is just a way of saying that force rules and there are no absolute moral rights. You would probably enjoy the 'MIGHT IS RIGHT' book, by Ragnar Redbeard. I have read it six times. I have given many hours to studying Nietzsche's writings. People have many different ideas on what Nietzsche taught. I believe my interpretation of Nietzsche is correct, but I am willing to change my ideology if somebody can convince me I am wrong. This has not happened yet (lol).
@NIETZSCHEAN14 might is right is a universal in itself. its not your interpretation of nietzshe that is wrong, its that nietzshe was wrong. I am saying by using his philosophy, you can disprove his philosophy. might is not right, thinking it is right is subjective. might is right is not a universal truth.
@NIETZSCHEAN14 because there is no universal morality, it is our job to give the world morals before morals are given to us. we have a blank canvas for us to paint morality on. many thinkers after nietzsche have used parts of his philosophy and dumped other parts. to believe in it fully is bad faith. existentialism does not end at nietzsche.
@AtheistAnarchoRudi " we have a blank canvas for us to paint morality on" Particularly, I think we should paint it in a very sadistic and rational way. Bwahaha >:D
@WarmongerWW3. Does Dawkins believe slavery is absolutely morally wrong, regardless of where and why man practices it? Please give me a straight answer to my straight question.
@NIETZSCHEAN14 He does not believe that slavery is absolutely morally wrong, regardless of where and why man practices it, because he does not believe in absolute morality.
@monkeyman337 The sun isn't at a 'perfect distance' away from earth. The earth doesn't orbit in a circle, sometimes its farther away and sometimes its closer. On January 3rd it was 5 million km closer than it will be on July 4th this year. Not only that, 71% of the surface of the earth is covered in water so we cant live on it, and there are deserts and frozen land we cant live on either. That isn't even including tornadoes, hurricanes, volcanoes, earthquakes and tsunamis etc.......
@monkeyman337 If The ancient princess gaunschuala isn't real why is the sun at such a perfect distance away from the earth?
You see, you aren't providing proof for anything you are just claiming, that because things are as they are, then there must be a higher power behind it, which is a irrational way of thinking.
and by the way the god i mentioned before princess etc. said: All others gods are false, and that she created everything...
The Selfish Gene was an awesome, fascinating book. I really enjoyed it, and that is the book that got me so interested in evolution. the book made so much sense of nature to me.
@TickleMehNancy Actually, the last person told me it was a fruity kind of taste. Also, it really fucks me up that it took four months for someone to comment on my absurd post. Thank you.
@TickleMehNancy Well, I guess it was a bad way to put it, you're right on that. But where did you get to the conclusion that I love to guzzle cum? Also, what is nvm?
He's more like a celebrity for those that also like to sound smart. Arguments and exploitations are all very well but I feel bad for the lack of imagination and close mindedness that this man has. I don't want him to be wrong... I'm not religious.... I just don't respect the image he gives science. He spends more time with a camera and the public than his so called interests.
@Dolphidood He may use T.V. as a medium for imparting knowledge & why not - considering more people in the western world watch television than read books? To me it seems a very effective way of educating people which is his primary intention rather than your implication that his motives are some sort of ego-related, self-glorifying form of vanity.
He's using the best possible resource to inform, educate & challenge traditional patterns of thinking for something he feels passionately about.
@sleepypoodle True but I still intuitively from the fact that he makes claims that suggest Godlessness is a fact think that he isn't after the point of his scientific studies which is truth of the results and proof. He also talks very arrogantly and presumptuously about subjects and that leaves a lot of space for critique without having to be very pedantic at all and along with inappropriately exposing creationists makes me think otherwise... Good scientists do more research than talk.
Darwin adopted ancient pagan belief in evolution of species?
Why than is evolution hailed scientists as one of the most crucial and influential ideas not only for biology. (also for example in computer science)
Why didn't they just opened a history book?
You lack of knowledge is dripping of every line you've written above. It embarrasses me to know, that such intellectual diarrhea has sprung to live in a human brain, in my closest family, if you will.
@Nashhinton Dude, propaganda has evidences against it. evolution and global warming doesn't. HUGE differences. Hope you're not brainwashed by any propoganda or religious dogma.
@Nashhinton You are very ignorant. I guess you are mentally damaged. No need to try to apologize, I already know that you are trying your best trying to find that right word.. =]
@parafleet You shouldn't believe everything you hear. People don't like him because he's very direct and doesn't mince words. In other words, he's honest.
@MrBlackjackGuy Personally, I wouldn't have much respect for a scientist who is a theist, it's just too much of a contradiction and one seems incompatible with the other.
@Aladoniss Now here is what i keep hearing.life was so simple millions of years ago,that 1 cell.needed only 1 amino acid and 1 protein,and one tiny chain of RNA to live....
ok, where are these organisms? make them in a test tube if thats all the ingredients u need? only in the minds of atheists and evolutionists..do these so called primitive cells exist..and thats some FAITH!!!!..NOT TESTABLE SCIENCE !!!
@Aladoniss seems u have all the answers,man u are perfect..why should u be held accountable for anything?..or ever have judgement passed on u?..man i guess evolution got it all perfect..u and all the other moron atheist should start a utopian community..cause Atheist are Perfect!!!
@Aladoniss Homochirality proves evolution can never happen..but this is now separate from there lies..evolutionists would rather believe in some chemistry unknown to science than intelligence..they want to explain all life and how it changed but not the first cell..there's some stubborn logic...they dont want it in there theory because evolution falls apart..
it seems that only atheists can be scientist,and everyone else is just ignorant and uneducated.
If you ask me, evolution acts primarily on the individual's desire to see their genes spread, but there might still be a secondary 'good of the species' sort of thing going on. Which can be brought back to gene survival, seeing as how a member of the same species still naturally shares at least a minimal amount of genes, and far more genes then a member of another species.
@Shavarnarak Good point, only a note: the individual's desire to see their genes spread is also "gene-guided". I mean, there are genes which prompt this, which is an instinct for many animals, but also a "desire" for some others (us).
@danesbenoit I can understand that. Personally I want kinds, don't know why, because when you think about it logically what would I get out of that? Nothing! My boyfriend wants kids too. Not now, because he thinks about it logically he doesn't, but when I asked him he didn't hesitate. Why? It's coded! That, and their beautiful wonderful little things. :) See, secularists have souls, right? lol
@NuPheonix You obviously want kids, for the reason i've previously explained. There is nothing bad about that, we are machines perfectly evolved to spread out our genes, there is no purpose, it's only a consequence of our long evolutionary past, but since it's also a beautiful thing, why not do that?
The only thing i clam is this: accept your (our) nature, live it, but do not invent well looking "purposes" just to justify your actions. Always think sceptically and seek for answers ;)
THIS IS PROOF THAT ONLY CATHOLIC CHURCH IS TRUE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST AND HIS HOLY SACRAMENTS!!!
youtube. com/ watch?v =jqsRDD6kXWY
While they were eating, Jesus took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to his disciples, saying, "Take and eat; this is my body." Then he took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you. This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins." Matthew 26:26-28
Survivability from an evolutionary point of view is simply how good you are at reproducing and passing on your genes. Anything that will help you accomplish that better will be selected for.
i think that we've evolved beyond the point of survival of the fittest to a point of survival of the smartest. from survival of the selfish to survival of the selfless.
i believe that humanity has evolved beyond the laws of darwinism at least in t he west.
The majortiy of humans in the west can survive wheter they are fit, smart, dumb, fat or handicapped, everyone survives long enough to be able to reproduce because we help our sick and stupid, this has one benefit thought it provides us with a large number of humans wich means its easier to cooporate since we are so many.
KazakAigul has an inalienable right to believe in whatever he believes and I respect that, but his post is nothing if not downright ridiculous. Dawkins is writing his dumb books to exploit vulnerable humans!!!! Wow. In which category would he place Kent Hovind, Ken Ham and Ray Comfort?
Dawkins in one of the finest products of the western civilization. Reason. humanism, intellect and and a razor-sharp intelligence all combine in an incredible manner to sculpture the sublime mind of this great man. A true specimen of homo sapiens sapiens.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Dawkins doesn't believe in evolution deep down in his heart, BUT, he realises that he can become well known and earn a lot of money writing dumb books, because human beings are so vulnerable !!
@KazakAigul Sometimes evolution dictates a subspecies is doomed to extinction. That's you and your sad buddies. So it's true enough, for you there is no future, no evolution, just extinction. You won't be missed borat.
@KazakAigul I would say that your critique of his "dumb books" has value, as you are so educated, but I really can't make that assumption can I? It wouldn't be reasonable, considering your command (or lack thereof) of grammar and language.
@KazakAigul keep writing so i can read it to laugh and cheer up when i am feeling sad miserable and fucked up in life. your honesty is simply amusing.
@KazakAigul dumb books like the bible? oh no, you mean dumb books with hard evidence to back up the theories...so dumb. Why can't we go back to the days where we blindly followed superstition and rumours?! we live in dark days.
@KazakAigul oh-no evolutionists.... this guy is on to us!! He knows evolutionary theory is just a hoax and scam to make money. We are sooooo busted! How could we be so dumb? I mean, creation is obvious.. just look at trees!
@KazakAigul If anything Dawkins is trying to help people from being so vulnerable. They actually believe there is a magical sky daddy watching your every move and if you dont believe it you will burn and choke and suffer forever... BUT he LOVES YOU!!
@KazakAigul You are such an idiot, I pity your ignorance and furthermore any children you may have. I hope your children are more open minded than you and get a chance to read scientific literature.
Well, Jesus taught "turn the other cheek". Dawkins doesn't really address how that "finishes first" in the a world of survival of the fittest. The reason he can't is because the teacher of that phrase didn't finish first here either. He was crucified. He said the world will hate you (if you follow his teachings)... the sooner we understand what a bad state we're in the better. Anyway- my main point was that this lecture by Dawkins doesn't prove evolutionary love. Love is from God.
doveinturkey 1 week ago
@doveinturkey Love can't be from god because god does not exist.
xxxxxrandom 5 days ago
Damn, Dawkins was pretty sexy ;)
Clarkgasm 1 week ago 12
@Clarkgasm Was?
rossplendent 1 week ago 2
@Clarkgasm - Did the video make you want to meet him in an elevator?
zxcv1234vcxz 1 day ago
@zxcv1234vcxz Oh yes.
Clarkgasm 15 hours ago
I don't see how mutually beneficial behavior is "altruistic behavior". This doesn't address the possibility of "turning the other cheek" or "loving your enemy". Why would anyone believe much less teach these latter ideas in a world of mutually benefiting species or individuals?
doveinturkey 2 weeks ago
@doveinturkey Definition of ALTRUISM
1: unselfish regard for or devotion to the welfare of others
2: behavior by an animal that is not beneficial to or may be harmful to itself but that benefits others of its species
Seems Webster's Dictionary dosent disagree. Why would people teach turn your cheek or love your neighboer? They arent teaching that. Those are just catchphases that embody a deeper sentiment. Even if they are teaching them ... do we do them?
cycophile 1 week ago
who gives a shit about the soccer game! get on with it!
phantomcreamer 2 weeks ago
i think everyone here should watch the Dr. Robert Salposky lectures
slashes1122 2 weeks ago
A good book on this subject is Mutual Aid : A Factor Of Evolution by Peter Kropotkin
ozmonster1989 1 month ago
sooo bees are the descendants of a group of humans? subject by subject he can have a great view but overall he talks in circles. just an observation
2rainmalt 1 month ago
@2rainmalt No he just says that humans and bees have some things in cummon, not saying we are their ancestors.
gumme1234 3 weeks ago
@gumme1234 my sarcasm is so subtle. since his position is of evolution, i was sracsticaly proposing that a bee gene infected the apes he so wants humans to descend from. my proposal is not a serious one- co-operation does not exist if the selfish gene of both groups doesnt meet a natural need. circle conversations i find he has
2rainmalt 3 weeks ago
@2rainmalt well it is obvious that he needs to repeat and explain every variation, because creationists can't do it themselves
koyima 3 weeks ago
@koyima psychological content is primitive in thinking when applied to humans . it is however early works of darwin. nevertheless his topic has nothing to do with the origin of creation. hes just observing animal tendencies of the ego. here we go again with razy americans that cant coverse with out talking of god whether in bad or good. forget about god-
2rainmalt 3 weeks ago
i guess the selfish gene is typical of animal behavior. maybe this wwas the need of sciptures. to elevate yourslef from your ego? i dunno- he certainly reduces humans attributes to be greater and accepts we cant evolve above our "genes"
2rainmalt 1 month ago
Yay! the year I was born.
SkyFortStudios 1 month ago 6
@SkyFortStudios Yay me too :D
SpicaAndromeda 3 weeks ago
co-operation is not a natural instinct the description somewhat out of touch with "The Selfish Gene" book.
FreeeeS 1 month ago
back up for a second.
I can clearly remember Dawkins giving a speach to some guys from the Tory party. I thought he was a member of the tory party?
gulbirk 2 months ago
cute professor .. too much?
TheMonkiAss 2 months ago
does it mean premature ejaculation? no wonder girls like bad guys
frazshamim 2 months ago
eeeeew @ 4:39
Venustarr 2 months ago
@Venustarr you think it's nasty but it's just nature.
Mindaugas7100 4 weeks ago
he was younger but his voice is the same ! unique voice though !
cortez666666 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cortez666666 "he was younger but his voice is the same ! unique voice though !" Without it, his crusade for macro evolution wouldn´t have been so successful. He could probably say anything, and convince you.
"- Hi, you know me, I just want to inform you that I´m having your wife at dinner at my château this evening. Hope you understand."
baskethilt 2 months ago
Comment removed
Laurelindo 3 months ago
i always finish first. my girlfriend does not like that... get it?
Hermann2711 3 months ago 2
@Hermann2711 LOL!!!!
spareld 2 months ago
NICE GUYS FINISH LAST THATS WHY ILL TREAT YOU LIKE TRASH
gummipo 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system to suit their Evo-Hoax agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible
SpencerBenedict2nd 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need religion, hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important, qualitative differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption.
Homosexual activists, with complete support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims and martyrs; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 5 months ago
DARwin saw in an ape, Marilyn Monroe.
AntiChrista4WPeace 5 months ago
grow up
1066design 5 months ago
I like his bike, but can he ride it in the midst of traffic like that??
indi600 5 months ago
I finish last thats why my bird likes my dick in her
yahoopig 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Societies that understand, and teach their young, that cooperation is better than competition will win out in the long run. I hope.
ndrthrdr1 6 months ago
Comment removed
ndrthrdr1 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
or
figure4etc3.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
TheServiceWeb 6 months ago
gosh! is that Gaddafi in 0.28?? ;)
mamabari07 7 months ago
and 7 christian ass ho ś
singerfromhell666 7 months ago
Fuck off, Ayn Rand :)
PrimericanIdol 7 months ago
I love the addition of Thatcher in the ''horrifying'' opening sequence
SwedxSimon02 7 months ago
Comment removed
Nashhinton 8 months ago
@Nashhinton you are injecting your ideals into the wrong arena. If you want a 'kindly' atheist to speak to, feel free to PM me. I come from a family with Muslims and Christians and I assure the people here that the majority of them look at religion as something personal. It's peaceful for them and it works for some people. Your assumptions about atheist and muslims are very wrong.
Bzdi138 8 months ago
@Nashhinton I'm sorry about your father, but that doesn't mean that every Atheist is like that.
BotBlink94 8 months ago
@BotBlink94, Thanks for your concerns.
Nashhinton 8 months ago
@Nashhinton wtf? you're completely 180 degrees WRONG. i don't know what rock you're living under or what books about what big assholes athiests are you've got your nose in, but you can't see reality very clearly. athiests are the people who NEVER speak up about their straight-forward belief, that's why dawkins is trying to get athiests to be more out there. but stupidity and ignorance is obviously a family traight for you. Fuck Head.
shcnoozlebop 7 months ago
Comment removed
Nashhinton 7 months ago
@shcnoozlebop Whatever point you were trying to make has been ruined by your unnecessarily violent insults and name-calling. Your ignorance and stupidity is shown by acting like a jerk in response to a stright-foward opinion. Why would you call someone you don't even know a "fuck head"? That pointless insult shows me that you are a rude and thoughtless person and your point is utterly worthless because of it. You are just a troll.
szafraniecamanda 7 months ago 2
Comment removed
Nashhinton 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please!
Know how shallow Dawkins is by knowing the criticism to his VERY, VERY FRAGIL book and arguments... Watch on Youtube:
Dr. William Lane Craig Responds to Dawkins Book
or
William Lane Craig Leaves a Chair Open for Richard Dawkins
or
Richard Dawkins Made The Worst Argument Against God In The History of Western Thought
No wonder why he is running from Craig as the devil from the Cross: this true philosopher could easily show what an unprepared liar he is!
Thanks!
feanando 8 months ago
Dawkins is sooooo cute!
szafraniecamanda 8 months ago 45
@szafraniecamanda He's an ape.
NorthNorth2009 7 months ago
@szafraniecamanda even now that he is older!!
merce0909 3 weeks ago
Richard Dawkins is smart, but he has obviously been affected by liberalism/political correctness. He should have studied the policies of the British National Front, before making inaccurate statements against it. Very silly thing to do for such a smart man. It is also a shame that Richard Dawkins does not have the courage to be a consistent evolutionist, and acknowledge that there is no place for a universal morality in a world without a god. God is dead - long live Nature, and MIGHT IS RIGHT!
NIETZSCHEAN14 8 months ago
@NIETZSCHEAN14 would nietzsche want you to copy and paste his philosophy(complete joke with a slight amount of seriousness). i agree with you there i no universal/objective morality. that does not make might right. one can use nietzsche to disprove nietzsche. there is no universal so therefore might is not always right. nietzsche wants us to disprove him.
AtheistAnarchoRudi 8 months ago
@AtheistAnarchoRudi. "MIGHT IS RIGHT" is just a way of saying that force rules and there are no absolute moral rights. You would probably enjoy the 'MIGHT IS RIGHT' book, by Ragnar Redbeard. I have read it six times. I have given many hours to studying Nietzsche's writings. People have many different ideas on what Nietzsche taught. I believe my interpretation of Nietzsche is correct, but I am willing to change my ideology if somebody can convince me I am wrong. This has not happened yet (lol).
NIETZSCHEAN14 8 months ago
@NIETZSCHEAN14 might is right is a universal in itself. its not your interpretation of nietzshe that is wrong, its that nietzshe was wrong. I am saying by using his philosophy, you can disprove his philosophy. might is not right, thinking it is right is subjective. might is right is not a universal truth.
AtheistAnarchoRudi 8 months ago
@NIETZSCHEAN14 because there is no universal morality, it is our job to give the world morals before morals are given to us. we have a blank canvas for us to paint morality on. many thinkers after nietzsche have used parts of his philosophy and dumped other parts. to believe in it fully is bad faith. existentialism does not end at nietzsche.
AtheistAnarchoRudi 8 months ago
@AtheistAnarchoRudi " we have a blank canvas for us to paint morality on" Particularly, I think we should paint it in a very sadistic and rational way. Bwahaha >:D
WarmongerWW3 8 months ago
@NIETZSCHEAN14 Dawkins also does not believe in absolute morality....
WarmongerWW3 8 months ago
@WarmongerWW3. Are you saying Dawkins does not believe slavery is absolutely morally wrong, regardless of where and why man practices it?
NIETZSCHEAN14 8 months ago
@NIETZSCHEAN14 Exactly, since he is a rational person.
WarmongerWW3 8 months ago
@WarmongerWW3. Does Dawkins believe slavery is absolutely morally wrong, regardless of where and why man practices it? Please give me a straight answer to my straight question.
NIETZSCHEAN14 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NIETZSCHEAN14 He does not believe that slavery is absolutely morally wrong, regardless of where and why man practices it, because he does not believe in absolute morality.
WarmongerWW3 8 months ago 2
@WarmongerWW3. I agree with Dawkins, then.
NIETZSCHEAN14 8 months ago
@NIETZSCHEAN14 Me too.
WarmongerWW3 8 months ago
@NIETZSCHEAN14 Dawkins - Absolute Morality
watch?v=dxdgCxK4VUA
WarmongerWW3 8 months ago
RD > HD.
AnOvyx 9 months ago 16
@monkeyman337 The sun isn't at a 'perfect distance' away from earth. The earth doesn't orbit in a circle, sometimes its farther away and sometimes its closer. On January 3rd it was 5 million km closer than it will be on July 4th this year. Not only that, 71% of the surface of the earth is covered in water so we cant live on it, and there are deserts and frozen land we cant live on either. That isn't even including tornadoes, hurricanes, volcanoes, earthquakes and tsunamis etc.......
vicksoma 10 months ago
@monkeyman337 If The ancient princess gaunschuala isn't real why is the sun at such a perfect distance away from the earth?
You see, you aren't providing proof for anything you are just claiming, that because things are as they are, then there must be a higher power behind it, which is a irrational way of thinking.
and by the way the god i mentioned before princess etc. said: All others gods are false, and that she created everything...
You have no proof you're just spewing bullshit.
Dimajo 10 months ago 4
man I wish I could do the nasty with him. His brain and his accent get me worked up I dare say.
isisdron 10 months ago
The Selfish Gene was an awesome, fascinating book. I really enjoyed it, and that is the book that got me so interested in evolution. the book made so much sense of nature to me.
GodlessMorality 10 months ago
dawkins is so gay, even his body language has a lisp
fanaticastype 10 months ago
@fanaticastype Well that comment just shows how evolution is random and can result in mutants. LOL!
johneamer 10 months ago
@johneamer my father fucked your mother, thats how i was born, pretty random and selfish act.
fanaticastype 10 months ago
Comment removed
fanaticastype 10 months ago
Damn, he was a hottie.
ThumbprintTheatrics 11 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
"Nice guys finish last."
Yeah, but our cum is thicker than everyone elses.
MotherNikita 11 months ago 33
@MotherNikita yeah but ur cum taste like garbage
TickleMehNancy 7 months ago
@TickleMehNancy Actually, the last person told me it was a fruity kind of taste. Also, it really fucks me up that it took four months for someone to comment on my absurd post. Thank you.
MotherNikita 7 months ago
@MotherNikita you're a fucked up cum guzzlah
TickleMehNancy 7 months ago
@TickleMehNancy Are you really trying to start a fight over the internet? If so, grow up.
MotherNikita 7 months ago
@MotherNikita no u just said it fucks u up...nvm...
TickleMehNancy 7 months ago
@TickleMehNancy Well, I guess it was a bad way to put it, you're right on that. But where did you get to the conclusion that I love to guzzle cum? Also, what is nvm?
MotherNikita 7 months ago
@MotherNikita idk i think every1 likes cum once in a while.
TickleMehNancy 7 months ago
@TickleMehNancy ZING! That was a good one. I guess that explains my original post.
MotherNikita 7 months ago
He's more like a celebrity for those that also like to sound smart. Arguments and exploitations are all very well but I feel bad for the lack of imagination and close mindedness that this man has. I don't want him to be wrong... I'm not religious.... I just don't respect the image he gives science. He spends more time with a camera and the public than his so called interests.
Dolphidood 1 year ago
@Dolphidood He may use T.V. as a medium for imparting knowledge & why not - considering more people in the western world watch television than read books? To me it seems a very effective way of educating people which is his primary intention rather than your implication that his motives are some sort of ego-related, self-glorifying form of vanity.
He's using the best possible resource to inform, educate & challenge traditional patterns of thinking for something he feels passionately about.
sleepypoodle 1 year ago
@sleepypoodle True but I still intuitively from the fact that he makes claims that suggest Godlessness is a fact think that he isn't after the point of his scientific studies which is truth of the results and proof. He also talks very arrogantly and presumptuously about subjects and that leaves a lot of space for critique without having to be very pedantic at all and along with inappropriately exposing creationists makes me think otherwise... Good scientists do more research than talk.
Dolphidood 1 year ago
Comment removed
Nashhinton 1 year ago
@Nashhinton
Wahahahahaha, funny!
dawkinschannel 1 year ago 40
Comment removed
Nashhinton 8 months ago
@Nashhinton so let me summarize:
Darwin adopted ancient pagan belief in evolution of species?
Why than is evolution hailed scientists as one of the most crucial and influential ideas not only for biology. (also for example in computer science)
Why didn't they just opened a history book?
You lack of knowledge is dripping of every line you've written above. It embarrasses me to know, that such intellectual diarrhea has sprung to live in a human brain, in my closest family, if you will.
referredtoasChile 1 year ago
@Nashhinton
Pagan beliefs ftw!!!!!!!!
unfad1ng 1 year ago
@Nashhinton haha troll
seppomuppit 10 months ago
@Nashhinton Stop watching fox news and watch real news and read books.
babyranks4 10 months ago 4
@Nashhinton Failed!
ray180597 9 months ago
@Nashhinton Dude, propaganda has evidences against it. evolution and global warming doesn't. HUGE differences. Hope you're not brainwashed by any propoganda or religious dogma.
killerboyfoolz 8 months ago
Comment removed
Nashhinton 8 months ago
@Nashhinton Great, thanks to let us know that you are mentally damaged. Now we don't need to believe in what you are saying.
killerboyfoolz 8 months ago
Comment removed
Nashhinton 8 months ago
@Nashhinton Probably because you're irrational in your syntax.
argentinaforever15 8 months ago
Comment removed
Nashhinton 8 months ago
@Nashhinton You are very ignorant. I guess you are mentally damaged. No need to try to apologize, I already know that you are trying your best trying to find that right word.. =]
killerboyfoolz 8 months ago
He sure does like to ride bikes
MiKKA335 1 year ago
This guy is an example of Social Darwinism: survival of the most vulgar.
(That is what I heard; I don't know anything about him.)
parafleet 1 year ago
@parafleet You shouldn't believe everything you hear. People don't like him because he's very direct and doesn't mince words. In other words, he's honest.
rooley 1 year ago
@rooley I don't know. I try not to get involved when two sides start to throw their shit at each other.
parafleet 1 year ago
@Aladoniss Being a scientist and religious is okay. But those who believe the Earth was created 6,000 years ago, are just plain ignorant and stupid.
MrBlackjackGuy 1 year ago
@MrBlackjackGuy Personally, I wouldn't have much respect for a scientist who is a theist, it's just too much of a contradiction and one seems incompatible with the other.
sleepypoodle 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Time to stop crying try Naughty women benaughtyman.info
himasaanjani 1 year ago
@Aladoniss Now here is what i keep hearing.life was so simple millions of years ago,that 1 cell.needed only 1 amino acid and 1 protein,and one tiny chain of RNA to live....
ok, where are these organisms? make them in a test tube if thats all the ingredients u need? only in the minds of atheists and evolutionists..do these so called primitive cells exist..and thats some FAITH!!!!..NOT TESTABLE SCIENCE !!!
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Aladoniss seems u have all the answers,man u are perfect..why should u be held accountable for anything?..or ever have judgement passed on u?..man i guess evolution got it all perfect..u and all the other moron atheist should start a utopian community..cause Atheist are Perfect!!!
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Aladoniss In regards to RNA/DNA - could you please explain the problem of Chirality?
Although Miller and Urey formed amino acids in their experiments in 1952 - all the amino acids that formed lacked Chirality.!!
It is a universally accepted fact of chemistry that chirality cannot be created in chemical molecules by a random process.or in a test tube
they believe in some chemistry unknown to science.
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Aladoniss Homochirality proves evolution can never happen..but this is now separate from there lies..evolutionists would rather believe in some chemistry unknown to science than intelligence..they want to explain all life and how it changed but not the first cell..there's some stubborn logic...they dont want it in there theory because evolution falls apart..
it seems that only atheists can be scientist,and everyone else is just ignorant and uneducated.
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
@Aladoniss Im not an atheist man u must have misread it..i no longer believe in random time and chance bullshit..
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
come online bbw there for you naneedj.info
siththee 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Honest sexy Asian brides "busizz4me.info"
MoniRokse 1 year ago
If you ask me, evolution acts primarily on the individual's desire to see their genes spread, but there might still be a secondary 'good of the species' sort of thing going on. Which can be brought back to gene survival, seeing as how a member of the same species still naturally shares at least a minimal amount of genes, and far more genes then a member of another species.
Shavarnarak 1 year ago
@Shavarnarak Good point, only a note: the individual's desire to see their genes spread is also "gene-guided". I mean, there are genes which prompt this, which is an instinct for many animals, but also a "desire" for some others (us).
danesbenoit 1 year ago
@danesbenoit I can understand that. Personally I want kinds, don't know why, because when you think about it logically what would I get out of that? Nothing! My boyfriend wants kids too. Not now, because he thinks about it logically he doesn't, but when I asked him he didn't hesitate. Why? It's coded! That, and their beautiful wonderful little things. :) See, secularists have souls, right? lol
NuPheonix 1 year ago
@NuPheonix You obviously want kids, for the reason i've previously explained. There is nothing bad about that, we are machines perfectly evolved to spread out our genes, there is no purpose, it's only a consequence of our long evolutionary past, but since it's also a beautiful thing, why not do that?
The only thing i clam is this: accept your (our) nature, live it, but do not invent well looking "purposes" just to justify your actions. Always think sceptically and seek for answers ;)
danesbenoit 1 year ago
@NuPheonix of course the last part of my comment is generic, i'm not refering to you directly.
danesbenoit 1 year ago
Some of the game theory introduced by John Maynard Smith can be quite complicated when applying it to humans but it is interesting to consider.
STEPHENWRAYSFORD33 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi brother needs to chat a, Asian women busizz4me.info
tuhinsurrawasidali 1 year ago
i'm confused, someone explain to me how soccer works!!! D:
blazearmoru 1 year ago
quite the sweener werent u dawkins in ur day?!!
stitcha123 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THIS IS PROOF THAT ONLY CATHOLIC CHURCH IS TRUE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST AND HIS HOLY SACRAMENTS!!!
youtube. com/ watch?v =jqsRDD6kXWY
While they were eating, Jesus took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to his disciples, saying, "Take and eat; this is my body." Then he took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you. This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins." Matthew 26:26-28
God bless You
JezusSlave 1 year ago
Comment removed
AtheistBrit 1 year ago
Thank you for uploading. very educational.
And erm...I can't help remarking that he must have been very attractive in those days. What a good-looking bloke!. o_O
totaldynamix 1 year ago 3
lol Richard Dawkins is a flower child. Free love and orgies for everyone~
nagzul 1 year ago 4
Show me where the "selfish gene" is located.
nagzul 1 year ago
wow, dawkins looked great in his young days. not to say hes ugly now. now hes got the wise old man look.
MacDaddyPooty 1 year ago
most awful music
GoldenbanjoDJ 1 year ago
good and interesting football analogy im looking forward to the rest of the documentary =)
1aaronaaron1 1 year ago
As George Costanza would put it, I say this with an unbroken record of heterosexuality, but there's a good-looking guy.
No wonder he married a Time Lady.
crabbieappleton 1 year ago 3
If you like such things
bryn100 1 year ago
i know some religious people who cant handle the reality of you scratch my back il scrath yours.
Hadesofthe07 1 year ago
Dawkins is sexy.
SchoolGuy2 1 year ago 20
Dawkins was snazzy looking guy back in the day
daftpunkrulerfan1 1 year ago 4
Survivability from an evolutionary point of view is simply how good you are at reproducing and passing on your genes. Anything that will help you accomplish that better will be selected for.
whyabadi 1 year ago
i think that we've evolved beyond the point of survival of the fittest to a point of survival of the smartest. from survival of the selfish to survival of the selfless.
alvisc2002 1 year ago
@alvisc2002 I think we have evolved into "survival of those who have the best contacts".
IcedPhoenix666 1 year ago 3
@alvisc2002
i believe that humanity has evolved beyond the laws of darwinism at least in t he west.
The majortiy of humans in the west can survive wheter they are fit, smart, dumb, fat or handicapped, everyone survives long enough to be able to reproduce because we help our sick and stupid, this has one benefit thought it provides us with a large number of humans wich means its easier to cooporate since we are so many.
unfad1ng 1 year ago
rolling on the floor laughing at kazakAigul (with a big notice on AT)
gr4ndhustle 1 year ago
KazakAigul has an inalienable right to believe in whatever he believes and I respect that, but his post is nothing if not downright ridiculous. Dawkins is writing his dumb books to exploit vulnerable humans!!!! Wow. In which category would he place Kent Hovind, Ken Ham and Ray Comfort?
1lovereason 1 year ago 2
Dawkins in one of the finest products of the western civilization. Reason. humanism, intellect and and a razor-sharp intelligence all combine in an incredible manner to sculpture the sublime mind of this great man. A true specimen of homo sapiens sapiens.
1lovereason 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Dawkins doesn't believe in evolution deep down in his heart, BUT, he realises that he can become well known and earn a lot of money writing dumb books, because human beings are so vulnerable !!
KazakAigul 1 year ago
@KazakAigul
Wahahaha, you're really a GREAT comedian!
Where will you play your next show?
Hilarious.
dawkinschannel 1 year ago 81
@KazakAigul Sometimes evolution dictates a subspecies is doomed to extinction. That's you and your sad buddies. So it's true enough, for you there is no future, no evolution, just extinction. You won't be missed borat.
nilbud 1 year ago
@KazakAigul I would say that your critique of his "dumb books" has value, as you are so educated, but I really can't make that assumption can I? It wouldn't be reasonable, considering your command (or lack thereof) of grammar and language.
dustinsandwich 1 year ago
@KazakAigul alright, the burden of proof is on you to prove this statement. Where is your evidence...?
NoKoop 1 year ago
@KazakAigul keep writing so i can read it to laugh and cheer up when i am feeling sad miserable and fucked up in life. your honesty is simply amusing.
sushanalone 1 year ago
@KazakAigul dumb books like the bible? oh no, you mean dumb books with hard evidence to back up the theories...so dumb. Why can't we go back to the days where we blindly followed superstition and rumours?! we live in dark days.
DaltonSanitarium 1 year ago
@KazakAigul oh-no evolutionists.... this guy is on to us!! He knows evolutionary theory is just a hoax and scam to make money. We are sooooo busted! How could we be so dumb? I mean, creation is obvious.. just look at trees!
-PLEASE observe the Sarcasm.
xebek 1 year ago 4
@KazakAigul If anything Dawkins is trying to help people from being so vulnerable. They actually believe there is a magical sky daddy watching your every move and if you dont believe it you will burn and choke and suffer forever... BUT he LOVES YOU!!
Jason29n 1 year ago
@KazakAigul You are such an idiot, I pity your ignorance and furthermore any children you may have. I hope your children are more open minded than you and get a chance to read scientific literature.
torontoBluejays87 1 year ago
@KazakAigul This sort of comment is what "What the fuck?" was created for.
jlc012 1 year ago
@KazakAigul You got one thing right. . ."human beings are so vulnerable.
Sadly, you're living proof of this, my friend.
This is not merely sad because you are "proof". . .but sad because you are "living".
TheBestInterest 1 year ago
@KazakAigul Hahahahahahhahahahahahaha
C0DZ0R 1 year ago
@KazakAigul
you sir are a joker.
if there was a god, he would not b so silly as to allow a silly character like u to b spawned
hrishi31 1 year ago
@hrishi31 Hahaha you sound like virgin.
HitomiAyumu 1 year ago
@KazakAigul a great satirist
redryan20000 1 year ago
@KazakAigul I bet you're an American.
TheEnglishAt