Added: 3 years ago
From: Jawyerproductions
Views: 1,072,550
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,831)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • One word Tsar bomb

  • Number 2. he he he he

  • Come at me bro!

  • my country has 3 javelins with 12 missiles :P

  • Impressive price...you can get around 2000 rounds for RPG-7 for this price... Enough to blow up small city.

    And lol @ #2 plastic tank filled with explosive.

  • the first missile is a LOSAT (line of sight anti-tank) an experimental proof of concept demonstrator not the shoulder fired javelin that is currently in active service.

  • The javelin missile is one of the most high explosive portable missiles in the world. Containing more than enough explosives to destroy a tank.

  • fake video.

    The manufacturer of the russian tank promised to bring an action against the operator of a videoclip for a deceit. The official information.

  • I'm pretty sure the first one was a Tow missile and pretty sure I meant 100%.

  • Much to expensive to be justifiably paid for!

  • its impossible tank is in thousand parts inside have intern explosion

    propaganda javelin its fail

  • What a bullshit, so before war USArmy will ask his enemy to, load theyr tanks with not secured explosives( right ???).

  • the first one is not a javelin missing, its a CKEM kinetic energy missile

  • HOLY CRAP!

  • As an antitank jaeger i gotta say that this video is full of shit. I have trained with tow and i have seen multiple shots of javelin and not a single one tank has exploded like this :D

  • @arosuzi cool you see that in a video game to wanna be...

  • @arosuzi Its true, the only way to fully blow a tank its to filled it up with at least 500lbs of high explosive and used an export 2e generation crappy lightly armored tank. In the real case scenario only pops part of the turret where ammutions are usualy stored and that's it, not the whole tank is destroyed.

  • How about on modern tanks? How will it react on chobham or reactive armor? So obvious this expensive missile were for shitty soviet era tanks...

  • russkie suki, gde vash T-90?! :D

  • @jvarosani777 уже у тебя во дворе пидор)готовь вазелин)))

  • nice stolen non-javelin footage

  • Downvoted for annoying editing and graphics.

  • US army are noobs and campers

  • yes again t-55 what about again new -90ms with relikt armor

  • @TATARSTAN59500 Like a hot knife through butter. The TOW can penetrate the armor of every single tank on the planet. The Javelin on top attack can also.

  • If you want big bang. put a couple of 55 gallon drums filled with gasoline in the target. Makes things more spectacular than they really are.

  • pause at 1:04 looks like the explosion started above the tracks before the missile hit the tank.

  • We need it in Syria to fuck some Russian tank with it !!

  • dislike due to 72000 currency non specific... typical American. prob never heard of ££ or Yen or Euros.

  • Tank was rigged with fuel and explosive to make it more impressive.

    IAmNotImpressed.png

  • @vava54own When are tanks not full of fuel and explosives?

  • @Binkophile

    You know exacly what I mean. A normal payload wouldn't blow up like that, you woulnd't even see a ball of fire.

  • @vava54own um, yes it would...tanks are loaded with SHELLS full of EXPLOSIVES and CORDITE...

  • @redreaper2020

    watch?v=LCXKTTOpJQ4

    Tell me it looks the same.

  • @vava54own that tank's a Leopard, being hit with a smaller missile (BILL-1); ammo storage is different. Also, it "pops" one after another because it's cased, single-piece L-7 ammunition; the loadout of a T-72 is a solid ring of combustible propellant canisters below a ring of shells all around the bottom of the turret. Caseless ammo is prone to sympathetic detonation.

    It's just physics man.

  • @vava54own of course it will... If you have HE ammunition and fuel inside of a tank, if you ignite it it will just work like a grenade..

  • @vava54own do you have any understanding what a missile is. It explodes. It is a missile.

  • @LordGilgamesh01

    You must be trolling if you think 15 lbs of explosive can reduce a tank to dust like seen in this video.

    I don't even know why I'm responding to your obvious troll post.

  • @vava54own Dude. It can. It is the most advanced infantry carried missile firing weapon in the world. In a way, it is the most advanced bazooka. And for your info, bazookas were meant to detonate on tanks to inflict heavy damage. And for 12 lbs. of explosive: if you had 12 lbs. of tnt for example, you are gonna blow up a lot of shit and put a small crater in the ground. Look it up. Holy shit you are insane. The Javelin can destroy a tank and they do in real life.

  • @LordGilgamesh01

    Dude. It can't.

    Just look at the very video you are commenting...

    0:55 The tank was filled with fuel and explosive like they do in movies to make it more impressive.

    1:27: Used on the field, notice the lack of big movie-like fireball and how the explosion seem weak compared to 0:55.

    2:05: An actual test. Again, notice the lack of fireball and "weak" explosion.

    I'm not saying the javelin suck, or that it can't disable/destroy a tank, it sure can. I'm just calling BS on 0:55

  • @Binkophile

    Here, that's what a real test looks like: watch?v=LCXKTTOpJQ4

  • @Binkophile than what's the point? they're always gonna blow up cause of the fuel and explosives...

  • @Binkophile because the missile his head is nuclear all USA wepons and missls are nuclears

  • Sick nasty indeed

  • The Missiles go directly to the target by a curve. Then why would people make the missiles go straight up to the sky and drop down to the target like in video games

  • @TheZachary1812 the javelin has multiple modes, the most entertaining is for use on heavy tanks with reactive armor etc, tanks generally dont have heavy armour on their roofs.

  • @TheZachary1812 the missiles in games are fired in top attack mode- designed to penetrate armoured vehicles on at the weakest point i.e. the roof. you can also fire the missile in the direct role- which is straight from missile launch to target. Direct mode is generally used for hovering helicopters or windows/doorways in buildings. Hope that cleared it up for you..

  • @boofinhoofneck1664 supposedly if you are firing at an IFV type vehicle, its best to fire direct. less armor between missile and crew/ passengers.

  • @TheZachary1812 Because most silly FPS games take place inside the minimum range of the top attack mode.

  • a question guys , is the rocket a HEAT or an APFSDS

  • @MegaChristaras most portable missiles are HEAT

  • @MegaChristaras HEAT. If it was APFSDS, there would be no explosion.

  • @ppitm that is not always the case , the ammunition from the tank could have cause the explosion

  • @MegaChristaras They don't usually put ammo in target practice tanks. But you would still be able to tell. The HEAT missile clearly exploded on the outside of the armor, and ammo detonation would look different.

  • @ppitm yeap

  • @ppitm It has a primary charge, which detonates on impact- designed to break through the tanks initial armour and then it has a main charge which detonates once (hopefully) inside the armoured vehicle. Ps. the tank in the video is full of fuel cans that is what caused the fire ball.

  • @boofinhoofneck1664 You're talking out of your ass. The 'primary charge' is just a weak precursor charge that sets off reactive armor. It doesn't do squat to the actual turret. The secondary charge is the main one, and it penetrates the armor. HEAT weapons like the javelin make a hole the size of your finger, so I don't know how you imagine a missile the width of your leg to fit through. Gasoline doesn't explode. The tank had 40kg of remote-controlled explosive in it.

  • The first footage is of LOSAT.

  • There is something i don't understand? U said that each missile cost 72,000 dollars...

    What about the tanks?? Why are they shooting tanks which cost more than 72,000 dollars?

  • @ThePappaDuck An M1 Abrams costs US$6.21 million

  • @Mandragara they are a bit more expensive now i think. overhauls to computer systems and such.

  • i love how you all are arguing over the specs of the most advanced and expensive planes there are. highly advanced+expensive=not alot are even used. the us military mostly uses the f/a-18 these days, because its less costly to make them, and are reliable. screw all your f-22's and EU's and f-36's or whatever it may be, f-16 is where its at ^_^

  • I'll Take Kornet anyday thanks.

  • Dear Dice, please review...

  • the monkey at the beginning scared the shit out of my dog!!!!

  • Confirmed fake video

  • хуита

    

  • Just look what the missile done to stupid unarmored truck.. And then compare the huge fireball with the T72 tank. You see?

  • Its faked.. Look from 1:02 and go image by image, somehwere in 1:03 you can see the missile on the top of the tank not exploeded yet, however there is some blue strange light just above the tanks strips

  • @Thecampercz @TheDrewman66 youre just jealous this is real

  • много огня и дыма это еще не значит что ракета мощная

  • @FastFlud Ну да,одни гусеницы остаются от Т-шек,это конечно фигня..

  • point taken, why spend 60k on a missle to send a tank all the way to heaven when that can send a poor child all the way to university?! No wonder US is nearly bankrupt.

  • 1:06 = epic bitch slap

    

  • The sound sure got to the camera fast...

  • @IMP003 And still the most powerful country in the world... oops.

  • @IMP003 And it's all thanks to Mr. Obama.

  • @IMP003 Then don't come here.

  • @IMP003 still better than your country

  • @IMP003 really? i don't think so. that 'll get you beat up, so i suggest you shut up. what country are you from anyway? i can bet you a million dollars it is in a far worse shape.

  • @davidib17 well i don't like this situation either but the facts dont lie my friend. Just dont believe everything your government is telling you. btw im from germany and NO im not a nazi.

  • @IMP003 l0l ikr me and every other person living in america is fucked.but what do i now im only 15 :P

  • @cbskatepr0ductionz forgot to add that you are only 15 and a homosexual.

  • @IMP003 Merica!

  • @IMP003 I suppose you're the "expert" here.

    Too bad you don't understand anything about the United States. You might want to focus on your own country for now. Where is it going?

  • @thefloodexos He's no expert,he's just stating facts.

  • @TheBlackIdentety Problem is, none of us know what is really going on. So until you're sure of that, and you can back it up, you might want to just put a sock in your mouth for now. Or in this case, over your hands. 

  • @thefloodexos lol I know what's going on.The information is available.You just need to know where to look for it.

    "Invisible Empire A New World Order Defined" Type this into the search bar and watch the doc.You'll be shocked and probably won't even believe it at first.Maybe you'll remain in denial for ever.Not my concern.I showed you the first step to the truth.

  • Comment removed

  • @IMP003 You forgot that we are fat, racists, obsessed with guns, and have a sense of entitlement and superiority that is completely unwarranted.

  • I agree with everything that @xanderschwab said. Additionally, that was a fucking sweet explosion.

  • T-72 LOL'D Let's try T90?

  • @axon2011 same thing would happen to either, a challanger 2, a llercrelc or (however much ameria denys it) an M1

  • wow proved nothing again old t-72 its so easy tes in new t-90ms tagil 

  • javelin is british you american propaganda idiot

  • @exbanwilb224

    search javelin missile on google then click on all the wikipedia page, dont say wikipedia is not reliable, if you really think it isnt, scroll to the references and look at them. its american dumbass confirm it before you say it

  • @dakane328 ehem, bugger off, I know people in the army that have been using it before the wikipedia article says so on the training ground, 2000, and they were british made and british designed. Plus, america doesent sell their best equipment to other countries except israel. The F35 is a cheap shithole of crap, a sea harrier would beat it in a fight, thats why the americans export it. The Javelin uses technology from 2000 in it so the ones in 1995 are either fake or wire guided versions.

  • @exbanwilb224 The F35 was designed for export and more versatile roles than the Raptor. The real deal is the F22, and I'm sure you know that. "Shithole of crap" is a little harsh for one of the most advanced aircraft ever built.

  • @thefloodexos the typhoon can take out both in a dogfight and actually has the ability to turn and carry more ordinance than you can fit in your suitcase.

  • @exbanwilb224 I'd love to see it some day! The F22 has more advanced radar, a stealthier build, weapons that are just as effective, and better handling. The Typhoon has much less stability. Don't forget the ability to go faster without afterburners, or the whole "thrust-vectoring" deal.

    Glad you know your stuff!

  • @thefloodexos it has considrably less handling, not much room for weapons as they internally mounted. The tech doesn't work in a dogfight. The typhoon is less stable to give it more manouvrability using technology that the amercans haven't put in their aircraft yet. We have ASMs that are more advanced than the US versions and better flares also.

  • @exbanwilb224 Dogfight? The whole idea behind the technology in today air superiority fighters is to eliminate the enemy from afar. If you can't see or detect the F22 til it's too late, and there's already missiles coming at you, then what are you to do? Not to detract from the Eurofighter. It's capable alright. But technology goes a long way today. I'd say a very skilled pilot in the EF could put down a F22 in a dogfight, perhaps. But not as far as overall performance in the field

  • @thefloodexos ehem, the EF has more flares, and more chaff. So it's fully capable of evading whatever the F22 uses. UV missiles still miss 90% of the time and stealth tech can easily be overcome by 2 radar stations working together.

  • @exbanwilb224 Flares and chaff have been around for a long time. You don't think there's been any attempt to circumvent countermeasures like that? It's not so simple.

    Anyways, you have your view and I have mine. We'll likely never see an EF take on a F22 in any theater, so I guess I'll just leave it at that.

  • @thefloodexos unless the US invades the UK. Discussion over.

  • @exbanwilb224 Lol. Not even worth responding to.

  • @thefloodexos shut the hell up and go away, why have you responded, it makes no logical sense.

  • @exbanwilb224 Because making people like you angry is very enjoyable for me :)

  • @thefloodexos trollolololol. shut up and stop it with the spam.

  • @thefloodexos if saudi arabia go to war w/ the us then probably.

  • @dakane328 the references could be a load of rubbish if you don't check.

  • @exbanwilb224 the british use it, but didnt design it, they only started using it in 2003, US in 1996 also, on wikipedia not that on the side bar thing it says place of origin: united states

  • mw3!!!! live

  • lol in mw they have infinite javelin missiles

  • You claim that this missile can make a tank blow up like this? Well it doesnt. There obviously are explosives loaded on the tank. Id say thats waste of money if that missile would really be that brutal. It doesnt haft to blow the tank to stop it. Even a tiny hole will make a huge pressure and heat inside the tank crushing the crew and burning them in a heartbeat. And the most low cost way is to buy a bottle of boose and matches.

  • 240p we meet again...

  • And it takes two of these to kill a tank in bf3. WTF!

  • Use

  • I would like to Carl Gustav 84mm rcl

  • wast of time ,money .SHIT!

  • $72K may seem like alot but considering the tanks they can destroy cost aroudn $30M I think its pretty cheap

  • I like how they stuff those tanks with explosives so that they blow up like napalm.

  • Is a TOW not a javelin... Javelins go vertical???

  • 1:08 fake too

  • 1:03 see spark before impact on the track .. lol Even here you are fake americans ..

  • 0:06 Ridiculous range of 1.5miles. Modern ATGMs go to 4-5-6-8 and even up to 15km. Spice LR.

  • ahhh, U.S. tax money at it's finest.

  • @cshimp10 damn straight its called defenseunless you want to have a socialist government tapping all your calls stop complaining

  • @jeremytconrad The US Government already monitors all electronic american and much of the worlds electronic communication. It's called the NSA. And they just noticed the use of those initials in this note. I'm a vet and a hawk on defense. That doesn't change the fact of the matter.

  • nice, glad to have it on our side.

  • 0:53 1:03 FAKE

  • Look! They can count, too!

  • The US lags most developed countries in infrastructure and education and people are still ok spending 2 billion/week on this crap? When we spend money on a fuking bomb it obviously offers much less in terms of return compared to spending on technology and education-which both increase long term growth. We could of put 2 kids through college with that 80k. Think about 2billion/ week.. thats a lot of kids through college or a lot of jobs. Keep it up America! We're racing ourself to the bottom!

  • @xanderschwab

    Some money could have been spent on you to help you differentiate between "of" and "have" :P Ok ok, I know I'm being harsh :P But I agree with you. Spending more on our military than the whole world combined, while we are $14 Trillion in debt and counting, just does not make any sense to me.

  • @RocketSingh80--hah,I ran out of room and had to rewrite the last part. Its youtube..I just ramble anyways. Our debt is definitely a problem but the biggest problem is the rate at which were spending along with where that money ends up. Bond yields are so low theyre indicating either a deflationary environment or cont'd high unemployment for up to 10 years. Tackling our debt should be on the backburner given current macro conditions. Also, cutting spending now is a bad idea (excl. defense).

  • @xanderschwab Not that the excessive spending isn't wrong, but the government doesn't create jobs. Also, how do kids expect to go to college if the country can't defend itself?

  • @gfalcetano defend yourself? are u even reading what u are typing. How can 2 wars where your country invades others defending? what have u achieved in afganistan?. You arent fighting taliban u are fighting farmers and herders who want u to get the fuck out there country. if USA came to my country same way u went to afganistan i would shoot the shit out of u as well

  • @NzMaze The war in afganistan, that's the bush campians fault. These republican leader are screwing up our country. First Regan, now Bush.

  • @maxomega3 dude you do realize that you sound really stupid your democratic man obama more than tripled the us deficit and dept

  • @jeremytconrad The whole reason this whole economy is screwed up is because Regan popularized trying to make the government run like companies. They thought it would make it more efficient. When will they notice that this ISN'T WORKING?!?!?

  • @maxomega3 When democrats realize spending all their money on Hobos won't work. People are homeless cause they chose to be. Let them rot.

  • @666rogue666 They didn't choose to be homeless. Who would? They didn't have the opportunity that you and I have or had to succeed in life. Plus, democrats aren't 100% focused on the homeless. They think it's an issue but it doesn't have to be the main focus all the time. 

  • @NzMaze USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA

  • @NzMaze you fucking idiot if you wanna put a stop to it get into what ever terrorist government your terrorist group is running and try to do something there is no way you will ever win against THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA you are a worthless piece of shit

  • @gfalcetano Actually government creates alot of jobs. All teachers are payed by the government and so are army men.

  • @maxomega3 Well, yes and no. Those are jobs, but they do not benefit capitalism. If the government wants to help the economy, creating those jobs will not help one bit. That's one of the ways Reagan benefited our economy. Lowering taxes and allowing businesses to prosper. Just remember, I'm not saying this in regards to foreign policy.

  • @maxomega3 the government doesnt create jobs the teachers get thier jobs from the union and the military is volunteer and the army just takes care of your bills while your in service

  • @xanderschwab The hilarious part is that nobody in the government cares.

  • @xanderschwab Whats the point of putting people through college if there is no use for those skills? We need to bring business back, education will follow. Not the other way around.

  • @xanderschwab look man i know you probably mean good but wtf where is your sense of patriotism? I mean really our men are out there shooting the fuck out of them and protecting us and you can only think self-centered upon yourself! show some pride in your country you asshole!

  • @gamestop455-Without question I respect anyone who will suit up for our country. Real patriots care about the future of our country and not some war based on psuedo-terrorists and fear. There are real problems and even genocides going on in the ME and we're fighting a war WE CANT WIN; were the only nation who thinks we can- thats the epitomy of self-centeredness. Refocusing and consolidating our power is the most effective way to handle problems in the ME, not a 2 billion$/week war.

  • @gamestop455 Protecting you from what, exactly?

  • @xanderschwab

    Yep! You're right! We should increase our dependency on the government, (like in greece), THEN, WHEN THAT GIVES US A HUGE FUCKING DEBT, WE GET PISSED AND RIOT WHEN THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T WIPE OUR ASS ANYMORE BECAUSE THEY'RE FUCKING BROKE FROM ALL THE SOCIALIST SPENDING

    capslockftw

  • @MetalSights- Hmm contracting companies for schools and infrastructure (instead of contracting our citizens to police the world) is increasing our dependency on the gov? Greece's economy is the size of Massachusetts, you cant compare anything about Greece to the US. Luckily, we still lead the world in innovation (Google,Apple,etc) but we're losing our edge as we spend money on bombs and not books. Wars gut economies. Lets save our ability to bomb ppl for when we really need it.

  • @MetalSights--Twitter and Facebook have been more effective in toppling dictatorships than our military. That should put our wars in perspective for you ;)

  • @xanderschwab Hell, anyone can bring a bunch of crazy Islamist folks together if they feel like they're being oppressed. I don't see how twitter and facebook helped anywhere besides Libya. But we probably SHOULD let the peaceful Mujahideen and Taliban win, they could aspire to be the next Somalia!

  • @MetalSights Peaceful Taliban? There beliefs are to wipe out everyone who doesn't worship their religion. There is a phrase in the Quraan that states all non believers shall perish. Hence the Talibans creation. Quit being mindfucked by the Democrats you fucking Hippy.

  • @666rogue666 I was being sarcastic. Have you seen my channel? Those cock gobbling pig fuckers are anything but peaceful.

  • @MetalSights *sarcasm asin, if the Taliban ruled it would absolute chaos and death

  • @666rogue666 Islam does not allow or sanctify the killing any innocent person regardless of his or her religion. According to the Qur'an and Hadith (sayings of Prophet Muhammad PBUH ) life is sacrosanct.

    We read in the Qur'an: ". . . Do not take life, which Allah has made sacred, except through justice and the law. He orders this so that you may acquire wisdom" (6:151)

    Islam is Noblest of anybody , Taliban or any other person who is not following the Right Islam Shariaa is not a good Muslim

  • @MetalSights-- So all the people in Egypt, Syria, Yemen, and other nations are "crazy islamists"? FB and twitter are the only means for people in these countries to discuss their problems and organize to protest them. These revolutions WOULD NOT of happened without that technology. Those people chose freedom instead of having it jammed down their throats like in iraq. Iraq has to have a civil war before any progress will be made there. (contd)

  • @MetalSights- The US cant force two factions to live together peacfully through war. We can't choose sides (Shiite or Sunni)- we let the natural order of things fall in place. Meddling with countries that are entering the first-world doesn't work for everyone. It creates situations such as those seen in N&S Korea or situations like those of Central America. We're repeating history but this time we're not fighting off communists, were fighting for stability in resource-rich countries