FagStorm: response to National Organization For Marriage

[727Phoenix]

The Bible is clear: Marraige is only for one man and one woman. Or several women. Or a man's sister. Or a man and his slavegirl(s), whether purchased or captured in war after her family's been righteously slaughtered. Or 700 concubines and 300 wives. Etc.

But not between two men or two women. Because the Bible tells us that's wrong!

[bgerics]

Good job, Bro. :)  Bob

[russ2246]

It's raining men, hallelujah!!!!!!!! :) Dan, you're one of the coolest people I've ever met :)

[jereamygrayrose]

bwahaha! great vid.

[dangerics]

For the assholes who say the marriage is a privilege and not a right, this is from the 14th Amendment:

"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the PRIVILEGES or immunities of citizens of the United States."

[preachersaredumb]

Haha! This was great!!!

[grimordwow]

Great video. I bet lots of people will miss the sarcasm though!

[dangerics]

@grimordwow Thanks. You're probably right.

[quantumleap7219]

There's a gathering storm of people that believe in a non-existent invisible man. These people think you're an abomination because of a thousands of years old book, and they have pandering politicians on their side who know better, but are willing to say anything to get elected and will pass laws that will discriminate against you in order to get the invisible non-existent man vote.

[Spartacus217]

A homo hurricane!

[aikalynn]

AND OUR ROOFS!!! XDDDDD

[kittyinthepiano]

Amazingly done! Love it.

[foreerknight99]

I'm not saying you are homosexual you are implying that from...No I'm acctuyally not a bigot

[foreerknight99]

obviously we are not the same or there would be no distinction. secondly that everyone who disagrees with teh idea of homosexual "marriage" is a homophobe or bigot when in fact many people support homosexuals living their lives just not getting married. Should I continue.

[foreerknight99]

If the forefathers wanted homosexuals to be allowed to "marry" then we would not be having this conversation because it would have been delt with.

[dangerics]

Where's the part in the constitution that guarantees straights rights to marry?

And tell me one of the lies you keep referring too that NOM is fighting the spread of.

[foreerknight99]

that is the point I've been making it's not a right!!!! as for the lies where would you like me to begin.

[dangerics]

YOU mentioned the founding fathers. Show me where, in the constitution, straights are given the privilege of marriage over gays. How do you justify straights having the privilege when it is denied gays?

The lies, I'd like you to begin with one. Just one. You keep saying the word, "lies." Tell me one of the lies you're talking about.

[foreerknight99]

privilages were not mentioned in the constitution only rights which you all seem to believe marriage to be and this argument from you proves that it is NOT a right. IF the privilege of marriage was ment for homosexuals then we wouldn't be debating this right now. same way we justify any privilege that not everyone can have IT'S A PRIVILEGE NOT A RIGHT!!! rights are for everyone privileges are for certain people. As for the lies lets start with the lie that heteros and homos are the same,

[foreerknight99]

budiamond: I haven't argued with you yet because I don't think enough of you as a person to argue with you I've been pointing out the truth and laughing at your lies. I believe you have me and you mixed up hero I am pointing out facts while you cry and lie on how your opinion is right when it's obviously not. I know the meaning of the word bigot and it is obvious that you "people" are the true bigots while you lie and call us (the people with morals) the bigots.

[foreerknight99]

the red light thing is not a right it is a law. I always enjoy when you all get right's privilages and laws confused. It's amuzing

[budiamond]

I also apologise to dangerics for spamming your comments section. I lol'd.

[foreerknight99]

we are not trying to take their right to live their lifestyle away from them.

[blackmetalqueer]

Freedom Action Group! great acronym,lol!

[jprice451]

Thank you so much for this - hahahahaha! Cobert did a funny parody too.

[dangerics]

My pleasure.

[foreerknight99]

this is funny but the fact is that NOM is trying to push the truth and spread the facts which homosexuals seem to hate.

[dangerics]

The NOM vid doesn't say anything. Did you watch it? They say things like "...are taking the issue for beyond sames sex couples..." but they don't say how. "They want to bring the issue into my life." but they don't say how. "My freedom will be taken away." But they don't say how. What "truth" are they trying to spread?

[foreerknight99]

yes I did watch it and it did say what was needed if you want specifics go to the website and do research just like with many commercials you just get a brief amount of info.

[dangerics]

There is no info in the NOM video. But you're right, it IS a commercial.

[foreerknight99]

just like many things are commercials and only have a short time to get a message across.

[dangerics]

The fact is the NOM is pushing hatred and homosexuals seem to see the truth.

[foreerknight99]

they aren't pushing hate, they just want the homosexuals to keep their lifestyle to themselves.

[dangerics]

Ha ha ha ha. That's rich. You mean like the straights keep it to themselves? Gays who want to get married DO want to keep it to themselves. They don't want to get married at your house and consummate in your bedroom.

[foreerknight99]

Normal people who get married do keep it to ourselves I am not at your home with my wife. Homosexuals are trying to throw their lifestyle in the face of society. If marriage was a right then this would not be an issue because the constitution would have said that they have the right to get married. Unlike Blacks who were taken from freedom and put into slavery homosexual have been allowed to have their lifestyle without marriage and

[dangerics]

Exactly, "without marriage." Gays want the same rights straights have. Straights have the right to get married and to parade their sexuality around in public.

There's nothing in the constitution giving straights those rights either so I guess no one has the right the get married. Heck, there's nothing in the constitution about stop lights either so I guess I can ignore them. That's not how the constitution works.

[foreerknight99]

they already have teh same rights as every other human being on the planet they just don't have the same privilages just like I don't have all the same privilages as the trump children. marriage is not a right though that is like saying getting into an exclusive club is a right when it is not it's a privilage. Your right there is nothing giving us a right to marriage we have the privilage of getting married. As for the stop light thing you go ahead and don't stop at the next red light

[Frostinesso1]

Worst. Argument. Ever. You not being rich like Donald Trump's kids is NOT the same as you feeling SUPERIOR to a minority of people and making their actions illegal. You CAN be as rich as trump. There is no law against that. And you have "the privilege"? What makes you the chosen people? Don't say God. You can't make a sound debate out of emotional belief. Give me facts. And that last statement was a terrible rebuttal...just awful....hey look, gay porn is on!

[foreerknight99]

of course you believe it to be the worst argumant ever since you disagree with me, even if it is the truth. You don't think that Trump's kids have privilages that normal people don't have then you are crazy. I never said I feel superior to you "people" this is something you have made up in your own mind. Being rich entitles you to certain privilages just like being straight gives you the privilage of marriage. the fact that we are straight is what gives us the privilage.

[Frostinesso1]

First, why do you put the word people in quotation marks? To imply we are not? Second, if you "people" think marriage is such a privilege(look, I actually spelled it right!) then why do you make a mock of it by selling it on game shows on TV and doing it drunkenly in Vegas with someone you just met? And again I ask, what makes it YOUR privilege and not everyone's? Who is that authority on that? Stop beating around the burning bush and go ahead and say it. As if you even needed to.....

[foreerknight99]

to make the distinction of which group I'm talking. The reason it has become such a mockery and placed on game shows is because1)some people can't find the right person with the people they are dating 2)the lowering of standards because of you "people". As for why it's a privilage for us and not you is because that's the way it is was and should always be. If homosexuals were ment to be "married" then we wouldn't be having this discussion. you are insinuating things which shows your bigotry.

[Frostinesso1]

Nothing you say makes sense! Nothing is backed up by anything and you still refuse to answer any question. How are we lowering standards? I cannot continue to have a conversation with someone who has a clear emotional response without any facts. I just can't do it. There is nothing to debate unless you start laying some real cards on the table. You won't win anyone over to your views without some clear evidence. You insinuate that I'm gay, it seems. I'm not. Guess you're a bigot too, eh?

[foreerknight99]

I've answered your questions I don't know how it doesn't make sense I've barneyed it out as much as I think I can. As a society on a daily basis we are lowering our standards and that would be one more twist on the spiral. I have no emotional involvement in this discussion I find it amusing that you think that I do. I will continue out discussion on the personal comunications that we are exchanging.

[budiamond]

I don't mind heterosexuals, as long as they don't flaunt it and keep their lifestyles to themselves. It's fine if they are straight, but when a man talks about his wife and his children, that's just going to far.

He doesn't need to push the fact that he's straight by going on about his wife, and honestly, being so open about the fact that he's had sex when he talks about his children....

I'm not heterophobic. Some of my closest friends are straight, but they don't flaunt it like that.

[foreerknight99]

budiamond you "people" are stupid heteros lifestyle is normal and having a wife is normal homos live an immoral lifestyle that they should live without having to flaunt. YOU "people" think that heteros breathing is flaunting our lifestyle of normality.

[budiamond]

Wow, aren't you an arrogant prick. Did I make you angry? You seem angry. I guess I'd be angry too if I was all for homosexuals not having their rights and knew that in the end I was going to lose.

Because you know what? You are going to lose. We are going to get our rights, and it is going to become a non issue, probably within the next 50 years. And it's going to happen while you and I are still alive. And there is going to be absolutely nothing you can do about it.

[foreerknight99]

no you didn't make me angry that would take me caring what you have to say. I'm not angry and I am sorry that you aren't smart enough to tell the diffrence. I'm for homos having their rights but marriage isn't a right. In the end right will win and homos will not get to marry.

[budiamond]

You obviously care what I have to say enough to reply to it and try to refute it (badly, I might add), so I'm not sure who the unintelligent one is here. Hm.

Maybe marriage itself is not a right, but it provides rights, and the easiest way to obtain those is by gaining marriage equality.

And in the end you will lose. History leans to the left, as they say, that trend will continue.

Anyway, I suppose we should probably leave this argument here. Have a good life. I certainly will.

[foreerknight99]

I don't care I just don't want your lies to be contrived as truth by the ignorant. you claim that my replies are bad yet you continue to reply so they have to be good enough you are worried that people will see the truth. We will see who is right and in the end when you are proven wrong I will not expect you to admit it because you wouldn't.

[budiamond]

You can bitch and whine and pretend we aren't real people all you like... but even then, you're on the side that has already lost.

In The 2007 Pew Global Attitudes project: "Should homosexuality be accepted by society?", a majority of Americans voted Yes, it should be accepted. So there, you lose. And very soon we'll have our marriage rights. We'll have all our rights. And you will be able to do nothing but sit there and accept it.

Oh, and. "Heterosexuality is not normal. Just common."

[foreerknight99]

I'm not bitching, whining,or pretending. If my side lost then why did prop 8 pass... Oh yeah because we have morals and people weren't fooled by the lies. I accept homosexuals as part of society I have no issues with them being part of society, just not allowed to marry. you "people" have your rights one of which is the right to remain silent which you obviously ignore like the typical homo. Heterosexuality is normal and right.

[budiamond]

You too have the right to remain silent, except unlike me, you obviously should since you are clearly highly ignorant on the topic of homosexuality. Go take queer studies or something, 'genius', then come back and say you have a valid argument.

What we care about is equal rights under the law. Which we do not have yet.

Heterosexuality is the accepted norm, because that's what we've grown up being told. Then again, ignorance and stupidity is also scorned, both of which you obviously are.

[foreerknight99]

no if either of us should remain silent it would definitely be you cause every time you open your mouth you just prove me right. I don't think I will take a class on fags I think I will work with what I learn from knowing homos. Cali already allowed them equal rights under the law if you looked at the laws. it must be sad to be such a bigot bud.

[budiamond]

If you couldn't tell from my last comment, I am not going to argue with you in matters pertaining to homosexuality anymore, because all your arguments are based not in fact, but in opinions contrary to fact. So go and live your life and stop your meddling in gay affairs.

(I will say this, though - the meaning of the word bigot - big·ot (bĭg'ət)

One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ. Use it right, bucko)

[foreerknight99]

I know you aren't going to talk about this any more I accept that you understand that you are beaten and don't want to continue. Also my points are based in facts you're are confusing me from all you pro-homo "people" and you are the bigot who your groups beliefs and are intolerant of those of us with morals who disagree with you, so I'm using it right bucko.

[budiamond]

I have one and only one thing to say to you.

Quadhonk.

[foreerknight99]

WTF???

[dangerics]

???

[dangerics]

Sorry budiamond. I meant to hit reply but I hit the wrong button, deleting your comment that said:

I was just trying to get that foreerknight99 prat to leave me alone, so I responded with my favourite nonsense word. :) It seems to have confused them enough to make them go away, so I assume it worked.

[budiamond]

Everything NOM said in their video was a lie or a distortion of the truth. Try looking up Gay Marriage = Religious Freedom by robtish. That tells you how many true facts NOM are trying to push (Hint: The answer is somewhere close to 0... oh no wait. It is 0).

[foreerknight99]

I've seen that one and commented on it as well the fact is that NOM is trying to make this world better and what they said is the truth pro-homosexual agenda persons are distorting their truth. The truth is that what NOM said is true and right and "people" who oppose their views are going to say that they aren't but that doesn't change the fact that they are spreading the truth.

[dangerics]

Please tell us one thing the NOM video said, IN THE VIDEO that is demonstrably true.

[cuddi]

This is probably the most fantastic thing I've seen in ages.

[Ekeers88]

Fag Strom sounds great! Maybe I could find a boyfriend

[thief05]

WOOO! Bring on the fagstorm! ;) nice work

[mote65]

HAHA <3

[HexaBoron]

Is there a rainbow after this storm? Seems to me they found a storm on YouTube. In fact, I think they stepped in it. Good work.

[MatthiasFarland]

Hilarious, sir.

[dangerics]

Thank you, my good man.

[l1nuxun1l]

"A fagstorm?"... Gays falling from the sky? Thats a start, using catapults might be a tad more effective.

[wendallstro]

looks like being gay went well for you . Go smoke another pole you quim.

[dangerics]

Thank you. That's very sweet of you.

[thief05]

thanx for watching a gay video, and leaving a gay comment, with a gay epitaph.. gee, you sure are involved with a lot of gay stuff, eh? :D

[wendallstro]

good one, is that honestly the comedic approach that gay wads take? how sad. nice try their fruity.

[ryuuseicha]

It's cute how you think you're witty.

[wendallstro]

I know for a fact that I'm witty.

[DJandtheFro4]

You're really showing off your sharp wit there, W.

[athywren]

Rather a fagstorm than a fundiestorm... Can you imagine the damage they'd do to your roof? Can you imagine the damage they'd do to your ears and brain if they survived long enough to talk to you?

Oh me, oh my.

What a wonderful day to fall from the sky.