Added: 5 years ago
From: haisija
Views: 15,215
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (72)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Water torch systems were around for decades before he "invented" his.

    HHO as a fuel economy booster is a scam.

  • This vid was uploaded almost three years ago. Some progress..

  • Incredible. Please don't let the oil companies screw this us.

  • You have to make sure its salt water

  • what if we run out of water we have bikes so let fossile fule run out

  • that is the most naive comment ive ever herd. water is everywhere, and emits no co2 gasses or any other harmful byproduct. the amount of oil the earth has is running out, and fast. but its ignorant people like you who dont care because the effects it has upon you are slim. its selfish and arrogant.

  • dude i would only agree if it worked with salt water if it does than yay more oil :from seamonkeylover333

  • it is very easy to remove the salt from water. the process takes little time and can be mass produced.

  • then good for the world and oil

  • thats the point

  • but plastic still takes up oil and we might run out of oil so yeah were screwed

  • By the time we run out of oil for the creation of plastic, we will have already established and perfected a system of recycling. so it wont even be an issue. however, one day, either by our sun collapsing, a meteor or astroid hitting the earth, us killing each other (via nuclear or biological warfare), or from anything else, we will eventually die. as a person, as a spices and as a world. everything action that has happened has to be undone. on both a universal and quantum scale. read up on it.

  • umm im only ten so will you explain it easyer? because i dont get the (universal and quantum scale)?

  • dude im only 15. but what i mean is that, in an "easier" format, is that the big bang is the only logical explanation theory of how the universe was created. so at the moment the universe is expanding (with dark energy making the space and dark matter holding the universes together.) so think of it like dark matter being a decorated christmas tree. when you turn out the lights in a room, you see the lights but no tree. our universe are the lights, dark matter is the tree holding them together.

  • dude ur not cool lol talkin smart rofl dark energy??? lol u mean antimatter

  • no antimatter is completely different you dipshit. you obviously have absolutely no understanding of the subject at all. fuck off, you stupid peace of shit.

  • If I remember correctly, it's been a while, anti-matter is just matter that is comprised of quarks that are spinning in a different direction, yes?

    Also, you said something about using solar energy to perform the electrolysis. If this can do it, we've just cleaned up the world. Done and done.

    And if I'm correct, one would not ever have to refuel, the evaporated water could be shunted back into the fuel tank for re-electrolysis.

    I'm in.

  • yes yes they are

  • so with the universe slowly expanding, one day it will reverse. and the opposite of the big bang will occur. everything will come back together and create a particle, or atom, infinitely small and infinitely dense. and quantum physics is the study of the physics that occur in an atom. so when i say quantum scale i mean on a particle scale. so, and this may be a concept to advanced, but one day we will all die. you, me, the human race, all "living" organisms. its my philosophy.

  • and in conclusion, feel free to worry about worldly problems and get the most fulfilling experience out of being alive here on earth. but keep in mind that no matter how many problems we can solve, in a way, it will all be in vain. so become successful and lead an honorable and moral philosophy but never forget your fate. if you do, one day when your old and rich, you wont want to leave. it will eat you from the inside and make you miserable. i would also like to thank you for an intriguing time

  • wtf are you saying dude

  • well it seems you are to naive. i apologize

  • :( thats a mean comment

  • you are ten. that means you lack knowledge due to the fact that you haven't experienced life to the extent that you know it. its not mean. its simply a fact. once you grow a dick and know what im talking about, then we will talk. im not being mean, im being truthful and factual.

  • i have a dick you meaney

  • lol i bet you do. but regardless, you dont understand because your maturity has yet to develop. your still in puberty and so this kind of thing isnt explained to you because it bores you to easily. therefore the concept of calling a person a no dick simply means that they dont have the knowledge of someone who does. it is not my intention to insult you, im simply giving you the truth. it may not be fair, but no one said it would be in the first place. think about it, if you can.

  • lol your a poo dick

  • "poo dick"? grow some balls and grow up.

  • poo dick lol? wtf are you stoned? were you stoned? even when im fucked up i dont say poo dick you fagget

  • lol create an atom atoms can not be created or broken and btw u sound like a big faggot

  • did you even read what i said? god your like a two year old. i was talking to a ten yea old who understood it better then you. the difference is that you think you know, but you dont. and your just making yourself look like a loser. when i used the word create it was a differential replacement for consolidate. and define broken. in particle accelerators they can break atoms into pieces, getting smaller and smaller. look it up. if you know how...

  • what they are using is electrolysis. they aren't breaking atoms apart, they are separating the oxygen and hydrogen atoms in H2O.

  • umm. breaking apart and separating are the same thing...

  • no you are describing the breakdown of atomic and sub-atomic particles. i am talking about breaking the nuclear bond between oxygen and hydrogen in a water molocule.

  • and if u forgot its expensive

  • its not expensive. we use solar to get the power, and the machines themselves are quite simple. which makes them easy and cheap. again, look into it. you might actually be able to put atleast some useful information in that naive, ignorant mind of yours. assuming we still label something so arrogant and immature a mind. its people like you that slow the progression of society, and have absolutely no positive impact on the world.

  • .... I hope for the sake of earth this is real

  • Many people are babbling on about net energy loss and all kinds of scientific stuff. Ok, you need electicity to power it but everyone is missing the point. If the tens/hundreds of millions of engines around the woorld used this & we still had the same amount of power stations then the benefit of reduction of greenhouse gasses is the biggest prize of all!

    But seriously, does anyone really think the money men will allow it?

  • Its not about the money men allowing it. the quesion is the public crafty and smart enough to raise the funding to beat the money men to the punch. our problem is we work against our interests by working separately and money men are unified by greed...

  • wow you guys who say that fossil fuels are needed go to college its called solar,wind and water power morons our fossil fuel supply is lowering but how much hydrogen is there? o wait its the most common element and if you dont think there is enough natural energies to support this guess again because if youve seen the new honda you can use solar pannels to do it from your house

  • sorry I fell asleep watching this ... cannot find the replay button .... is it me or is it the video

  • As a university level chemist, this entire claim is extremely dubious

  • Not in the slightest. It just fails to mention that, as he is unable to breach the first law of thermodynamics, he simply adds energy to the system in the form of electricity. Now, I'll agree that the efficency claims are extremely dubious.

  • No, he adds electricity to electrolyse the water into hydrogen and oxygen, the energy required to electrolyse it is == The energy of combustion, so E in is equal to E out, he isnt doing anything fastinating.

  • That would be fine if there was 100% efficency. But, there's 50%, at best.

  • I wonder if tap water will have too much left over chlorine and fluoride to keep the system clean. Maybe we could use Sam Pelegrino as nitrous !!!

  • Calling this using water as fuel is asinine. It's separating water into hydrogen and oxygen, then burning them, which creates water as an exhaust.

    A car that burns gasoline creates water as one of the exhaust gases too-- you can see this as the fog that comes out of a tailpipe on a cold day.

  • awesome,but the government has no place in it, if there's a need it will happen, basic economics

  • fucking spectacular, someone needs to use this. we can make an oil/sun/electricity/water hybrid

  • If this guy can do it out of his garage, what is raking so long to get it to the public. Oh well the world will end before this solution is opened to us.

  • sweet

  • btw theres a thing called solar energy... they just came out with a better solar pannel that looks like a black paint job.... therefore both technologies applied would make it all the more plausable

  • you might wanna book mark this... this could easily change the world as we know it! this si most definitley the soulution to global warming...

  • The reporter in this video is a moron. The flame isn't warm to the touch and magically "hotter than the sun" to everything else. The pipe isn't hot because combustion doesn't start until the gas is outside.

    Not to mention that he goes on to say that it can efficiently power a vehicle...

  • According to Wikipedia, there are three patents on "water torches", the last one by this guy. I'm not sure what contribution he made to the technology, probably something as simple as placing it in a box. There is a link to the actual patent if you're bored enough to read it.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W­ater_torch

  • Water is too valuable a resource to use instead of oil...

  • I can't see anywhere on the globe that shows large bodies of oil that seperate continents. I didn't see a high price of $3.00 for a gallon of water either. Instead this unused fossil fuel could be used to continue the production of plastics for our technological advancements.  I'd switch to a water/fuel hybrid if they prove to be as effective as a fuel powered car.

  • You still need electricity. You have to supply the energy to vaporize the water, dissociate the oxygen and hydrogen molecules and eject the pressurized gas from the nozzle. When it burns, it recombines back into water. However, net energy is lost as we all remember from fundamental thermodynamics.

  • ha ha listen to this guy he thinks he's so smart he just threw out a bunch of big words ha ha geocam is a dork.

  • These are words you should have encountered by 11th grade science class. Fortunately for scam artists, you will be an easy sell for "turning water into fuel".

  • Geocam outlined the flaws in the plan perfectly, Jirdimaster. I'm guessing that you reply to emails from Nigerian Princes, with your credit card details?

  • Ya i do dur hur

  • If you missed the point... It turns back to water once its done.

  • Microsoft did not come out of the garage, Apple did.

  • It worked, Daniel Dingel proved it, but those oil companies will do everything in order for this invention not to push through or go in public use.

    This is not a pipe dream. We can't use it because no body supports it, and those oil companies don't allow it.

  • It requires more energy to hydrolyze water than it produces. This is just a pipe dream. It it worked, we WOULD be using it, this is not a new invention or idea.

    /waits for conspiracy nutters to chime in.

  • That's my concern as well.

  • if this is really true lets use it!

  • i hope this does work that will really fuck over those greedy oil company mother fuckers! WOOOOOOT!!!!

  • this is amazing!

  • Wow! So Denny Klein is going to join the ranks of people like Steven Horvath in Australia, who sold a lot of stock to losers, Henry Garrett in Texas – in 1935 – and Stanley Meyer, who was convicted of fraud in 1996. Andrija Puharich – who also “discovered” Uri Geller! – Archie Blue, Bob Boyce, Carl Cella, Charles H. Garrett, Daniel Dingel, Hector Pierre Vaes, Nakamatsu Yoshiro, Sam Leslie Leach, Stanley Meyer and many others, eh?

  • i hope this dude is still alive and watch out. and good luck

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more