Humans Killing Humans... its always going to be that way.... I mean what if we did all lay down these nukes and we stopped wars... i bet it would be the other way round and the other nations such as iran were at war in our countries, cos we would be all pansies.... Its a cruel world... accept it ....
Mate, if you looked, the entire world has civilians' dieing all the time, theres too many of us in crowded spots, its like the chemical reaction of an 80kt nuke meeting ground at a considerable velocity
That's called pragmatism - not Ideology. I suppose you could say Emannuel Kant talked about it a bit in the 18th century (democratic peace theory) - but in reality it is crazy idealism to say that democracies with nuclear weapons dont have the right to prevent dictatorships that have publically stated their intentions to destroy those democracies from gaining them. Its insane, and you know it - you're just showing off, because you're young and you think you're clever.
I do not try to come off as a wiseguy, but given the fact that the US is the only nation to have actually used the a-bomb, says something. As long as the US got it, i feel more safe knowing that others got it.
I agree, its only ever been used when one single nation posessed it - even though that nation was a democracy. With weapons of this type a balance of power is always important - but you have to realise that if you give this weaponry to dictatorships where the decision making process rests on 1 person (the dictator) then you're asking for trouble. Simple as that - my point is that only democracies should have these weapons because they are much less likely to use them. That's all.
dunno about iran attacking back, [directly] but, dunno if it would go as far as us attacking them, we only go for the weeklings with the oil or wotever, but i know that this guy means what he says, an brown is, well, dose fula shit cover that group?
Iran is fucked...they are NO democracy. How can he defend them like that. Its almost as if he wants a confrontation. We have nukes, and we should't, but at least they're in the hands of democracies, not ayatollahs. I believe we have a diplomatic option with Iran, as long as we stop fucking around with them and be a bit sensible (Obama included by the way), but all this talk of fire and brimstone just seems a bit too dark. Iran would never nuke us, they're not mad, and we wont provoke them.
As opposed to Iran or North Korea, whom I presume you would be happy to have nuclear armaments because its so 'unfair' that we do and they don't? - Fuck of mate i've got a masters degree in international studies, and a first in international relations. So you've read a book by Chomsky or Michael Moore? - doesn't mean you've woken up. Twat.
So you feel that the US should be the only ones with nuclear weapens, and function as the global watchmen? Is that your personal oppinion, or something you have adopted through your studies. Because that must be the words of a fools ideology, either yours, or someone elses.
Well considering that Russia, China, the UK, France, India, Pakistan, and almost certainly Israel also have nuclear weapons capability, i'm not sure how you could have come to that conclusion. No I don't trust the USA, I marched three times in London against the invasion of Iraq and have always been a strong critic of US foreign policy. I just think that allowing dictatorships the use of this technology would be dangerous, so I would support action against N Korea or Iran.
HAHA PC! you think galloway is PC! what are you on! George Galloway is one of the only capable people in parliament to challenge ideas that we have come to except! Anti-White?! Hes white! he's pro britain you just don't understand him! And to the other comment! George Galloway is a national treasure! he shouldn't be PM but he needs to be in parliament to challenge those decisions made in our government
You see.You think I wouldn't know what elocution is! HAHAHAHAH....Are you anti-west? Are you a "REAL" Englandre or a greasy immigrant,or worse aself-hating white?
there isn't such a thing as a 'real englandre' none of us are pure of race and if you think so your fanciful! Im anti-'west' yes! and it is because it makes the rest of the world hate the west... Why would i hate myself for being white? as much as why would i hate anyone else for being black, or fat, or a lunatic... well maybe we will make an exception for that.. your a raving lunatic and im not very fond of you.. p.s i didn't say u didn't know what elocution was.. just said you didn't have any
what's more embarrassing is tony blair being bushes bitch and leading this country into a war on the basis of a lie! its Suez all over again you just don't realize it! except this time its influence and oil instead of a canal
How can you honestly sit hunched over your keyboard, watching this most probably out of curiousity as aposed to an actual care and interest in the efforts of those carrying humankind, how can you honestly sit there and critise the speech this man has just made?
you can tell he's been watching to many movies with this theatrical performance trying to woe the passive liberal English citizens with the over emphasized passion.
Who you calling "passive"? There's nothing passive about us - this speech took place on a demonstration that was initially banned until we turned up in such numbers that they were forced to let it proceed. There's nothing Creative about your Critisizm...
you do know that Che Guevara wasnt a Commuist right? Infact he highly mistrusted communists. He had sometimes refered to himself as a Marxist (not the same thing) but the main falling out point between him and fidel was over being a Comminist State or not. Castro didnt like communists, but felt that it was nessesary to defend against American agression. While Che wanted Cuba style revolutions elsewhere.
As For those Che killed, they would have been over keen to do the same to him
+ 1 mate. I'm studying international relations at university, and one thing ive recently discovered to my suprise is what you've just said, Che Guevara's political ideology was much more akin to Marxist/Leninist theory (global communist revolution) than it was to communism as most understand it (Stalinist "socialism in one country" isolationist communism). Che Guevara was certainly an political agent of change, and i doubt we'll see any more of his kind in the future.
This chucklehead is lifting up Che Guavera, communist. Communists killed more people in the last century than any other political group. If you like Che Guavera, please check into a communist reeducation camp so you can feel Che's love.
Seeing as we're getting into moronic stereotyping and comparing all things left to all things right, I wonder which side of centre you think Nazi Germany stood....
And that's before we've mentioned the military obscenities of the capitalist US.
So, aside from the bullshit you spout already, got anything to back that up?
ring george on talk sport and he will respond to any question or critism with facts not like the opposition or goverment who have to be advised before confirming thiere name he can piss me off but he is still a rare breed
very good point. You would never EVER see a polotician from labour taking questions from the public for a substancial amount of time, and even when they do the questions are usually prepared.
Comment removed
BiloLCFC 1 year ago
Humans Killing Humans... its always going to be that way.... I mean what if we did all lay down these nukes and we stopped wars... i bet it would be the other way round and the other nations such as iran were at war in our countries, cos we would be all pansies.... Its a cruel world... accept it ....
lightningpete 2 years ago
Yes, that TOTALLY justifies killing civilians.
EmperorFishFinger 2 years ago 2
Mate, if you looked, the entire world has civilians' dieing all the time, theres too many of us in crowded spots, its like the chemical reaction of an 80kt nuke meeting ground at a considerable velocity
lightningpete 2 years ago
That's called pragmatism - not Ideology. I suppose you could say Emannuel Kant talked about it a bit in the 18th century (democratic peace theory) - but in reality it is crazy idealism to say that democracies with nuclear weapons dont have the right to prevent dictatorships that have publically stated their intentions to destroy those democracies from gaining them. Its insane, and you know it - you're just showing off, because you're young and you think you're clever.
Tasbo1982 2 years ago
I do not try to come off as a wiseguy, but given the fact that the US is the only nation to have actually used the a-bomb, says something. As long as the US got it, i feel more safe knowing that others got it.
versaflex 2 years ago
I agree, its only ever been used when one single nation posessed it - even though that nation was a democracy. With weapons of this type a balance of power is always important - but you have to realise that if you give this weaponry to dictatorships where the decision making process rests on 1 person (the dictator) then you're asking for trouble. Simple as that - my point is that only democracies should have these weapons because they are much less likely to use them. That's all.
Tasbo1982 2 years ago
dunno about iran attacking back, [directly] but, dunno if it would go as far as us attacking them, we only go for the weeklings with the oil or wotever, but i know that this guy means what he says, an brown is, well, dose fula shit cover that group?
BadGrammarGoblin 2 years ago
ISLAMIC PROPAGANDA SPEECH
Soloman1001 2 years ago
Iran is fucked...they are NO democracy. How can he defend them like that. Its almost as if he wants a confrontation. We have nukes, and we should't, but at least they're in the hands of democracies, not ayatollahs. I believe we have a diplomatic option with Iran, as long as we stop fucking around with them and be a bit sensible (Obama included by the way), but all this talk of fire and brimstone just seems a bit too dark. Iran would never nuke us, they're not mad, and we wont provoke them.
Tasbo1982 2 years ago
You said " We have nukes, and we should't, but at least they're in the hands of democracies"
...In the hands of democracy.....wow what a democracy that invades and tortures other nations, man wake up !
versaflex 2 years ago
As opposed to Iran or North Korea, whom I presume you would be happy to have nuclear armaments because its so 'unfair' that we do and they don't? - Fuck of mate i've got a masters degree in international studies, and a first in international relations. So you've read a book by Chomsky or Michael Moore? - doesn't mean you've woken up. Twat.
Tasbo1982 2 years ago
Oh I am so impressed with your masters degree.
So you feel that the US should be the only ones with nuclear weapens, and function as the global watchmen? Is that your personal oppinion, or something you have adopted through your studies. Because that must be the words of a fools ideology, either yours, or someone elses.
versaflex 2 years ago
Well considering that Russia, China, the UK, France, India, Pakistan, and almost certainly Israel also have nuclear weapons capability, i'm not sure how you could have come to that conclusion. No I don't trust the USA, I marched three times in London against the invasion of Iraq and have always been a strong critic of US foreign policy. I just think that allowing dictatorships the use of this technology would be dangerous, so I would support action against N Korea or Iran.
Tasbo1982 2 years ago
Dictatorships have them too. The PRC, Pakistan, North Korea, take your pick.
Redcarpet01 1 year ago
i like him.
he's good !
zaedtaufek 2 years ago
I used to hate this man, but now I genuinely believe in what he's saying.
Georgiahulse 3 years ago 2
Piece of shit leftist PC antisemite commie anti-white and ant- European fag!
IBERJEN 3 years ago
HAHA PC! you think galloway is PC! what are you on! George Galloway is one of the only capable people in parliament to challenge ideas that we have come to except! Anti-White?! Hes white! he's pro britain you just don't understand him! And to the other comment! George Galloway is a national treasure! he shouldn't be PM but he needs to be in parliament to challenge those decisions made in our government
Raeloth 3 years ago
You have very little life experience.....He's anti-west.and he's a self-hating white .
IBERJEN 3 years ago 2
of course hes anti 'west' its that kind of thinking that is the problem
Raeloth 3 years ago 3
Anti-Western people suck major camel dick!!!!
IBERJEN 3 years ago
well if you think i lack in life experience you certainly lack in elocution
Raeloth 3 years ago
You see.You think I wouldn't know what elocution is! HAHAHAHAH....Are you anti-west? Are you a "REAL" Englandre or a greasy immigrant,or worse aself-hating white?
IBERJEN 3 years ago
there isn't such a thing as a 'real englandre' none of us are pure of race and if you think so your fanciful! Im anti-'west' yes! and it is because it makes the rest of the world hate the west... Why would i hate myself for being white? as much as why would i hate anyone else for being black, or fat, or a lunatic... well maybe we will make an exception for that.. your a raving lunatic and im not very fond of you.. p.s i didn't say u didn't know what elocution was.. just said you didn't have any
Raeloth 3 years ago
do u know wat r u saying urself?
infiltratorr 2 years ago
I think I do.Please "try" to educate me if you think otherwise.
IBERJEN 2 years ago
George Galloway is an abhorrent individual & an embarrassment to the British Parliament.
GuerillaGardenerUK 3 years ago
what's more embarrassing is tony blair being bushes bitch and leading this country into a war on the basis of a lie! its Suez all over again you just don't realize it! except this time its influence and oil instead of a canal
Raeloth 3 years ago
How can you honestly sit hunched over your keyboard, watching this most probably out of curiousity as aposed to an actual care and interest in the efforts of those carrying humankind, how can you honestly sit there and critise the speech this man has just made?
Thats not creative, its ignorant.
welldone on Galloway for openning our eyes.
xcutmeherehahax 3 years ago
you can tell he's been watching to many movies with this theatrical performance trying to woe the passive liberal English citizens with the over emphasized passion.
CreativeCritisizm 3 years ago
Who you calling "passive"? There's nothing passive about us - this speech took place on a demonstration that was initially banned until we turned up in such numbers that they were forced to let it proceed. There's nothing Creative about your Critisizm...
adycousins 3 years ago
Hes a demigog. He speaks truth many times but it never helps to be this "passionate" because it helps fester hate which then fester violence.
There is a way of getting your point accross without ATTACKING other and inciting people to use their emotions... USE YOUR HEAD.
By the way no side is innocent and without blame :P
I love you all - even da flamers
lord69z 3 years ago
George Galloway is the MAN!
juliaisafilmbuff 3 years ago
okeebaba
you do know that Che Guevara wasnt a Commuist right? Infact he highly mistrusted communists. He had sometimes refered to himself as a Marxist (not the same thing) but the main falling out point between him and fidel was over being a Comminist State or not. Castro didnt like communists, but felt that it was nessesary to defend against American agression. While Che wanted Cuba style revolutions elsewhere.
As For those Che killed, they would have been over keen to do the same to him
kingOFtheFISHpeople 3 years ago 5
+ 1 mate. I'm studying international relations at university, and one thing ive recently discovered to my suprise is what you've just said, Che Guevara's political ideology was much more akin to Marxist/Leninist theory (global communist revolution) than it was to communism as most understand it (Stalinist "socialism in one country" isolationist communism). Che Guevara was certainly an political agent of change, and i doubt we'll see any more of his kind in the future.
ps: i'm not a marxist :)
soapstar06 3 years ago 2
This chucklehead is lifting up Che Guavera, communist. Communists killed more people in the last century than any other political group. If you like Che Guavera, please check into a communist reeducation camp so you can feel Che's love.
okeebaba 3 years ago
Seeing as we're getting into moronic stereotyping and comparing all things left to all things right, I wonder which side of centre you think Nazi Germany stood....
And that's before we've mentioned the military obscenities of the capitalist US.
So, aside from the bullshit you spout already, got anything to back that up?
bigveasy 3 years ago 2
How can any goverment dare to even try ban an anti war demo?
howie1961 4 years ago 3
you know it's serious when they put police on the street to ban free speech against a war for freedom.
bigveasy 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HE is a good man !
idricool 4 years ago
he is simply the greatest, he says the truth and talks from his heart,I honestly raise my hat for this truly honest man.
Guevara1961 4 years ago
GEORGE GALLOWAY IS THE DADDY!!!
daboonster 4 years ago
ring george on talk sport and he will respond to any question or critism with facts not like the opposition or goverment who have to be advised before confirming thiere name he can piss me off but he is still a rare breed
kirkbyla 4 years ago 4
very good point. You would never EVER see a polotician from labour taking questions from the public for a substancial amount of time, and even when they do the questions are usually prepared.
Percy203 4 years ago 2
Hasta Siempre Commander William Walace II Galloway! ;D
wwwPNACATTACKcom 4 years ago
A jolly fine fellow.
krunchedup 4 years ago 7
GALLOWAY IS AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!
mowshetung 4 years ago 5
he is
wwwPNACATTACKcom 4 years ago
he should be the bloody prime minister!
mowshetung 4 years ago
He shpoul be head of UN/EU
wwwPNACATTACKcom 4 years ago
He should be head of UN/EU
wwwPNACATTACKcom 4 years ago
Remember Che!!
amsterdam78 4 years ago 3
He is my icon :D
wwwPNACATTACKcom 4 years ago
ur a legend topcat
keep up the good work
farmahfamily 4 years ago
Galloway!!
amsterdam78 4 years ago
ban the people? ha!
rOtFLLiOLiOLiO 4 years ago
cheers for this
thecouchtripper 4 years ago