Added: 3 years ago
From: sarcasmmister
Views: 47,745
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (216)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • it's like a mid twenties John Cooper Clarke with the Birthday Party as a backing group, I think this is fucking sick hahaha.

  • Good band, actually brilliant. But this just doesn’t work.

  • dogshit

  • @TheThetechnician rock'n'roll

  • @RobertBakkerHeeg if thats rock n roll then ive got a 12 inch cock....fukin gobshite

  • @partytimegiggaty you dont know the song library pictures bij AM? ipp, dipp, dogshit, rock'n'roll?

  • Well...that sucked

  • still i prefer the original version, the sound had more soul and was more appropriate to the lyrics. monkeys are good nonetheless, even with that terrible accent... :)

  • Comment removed

  • Nicely done

  • Fucking dreadful

  • As much as I like the Monkeys, this cover is beyond shit.

  • don't like this cover at all

  • this cover is crap shit poo suck

  • these guys are the music geniuses of the 21st century!

    and you can tell that by the way they cover nick cave, the genius of the 20th century :)))

  • hoooo yo estuve ahí !!! so fuck¡¡¡¡¡¡

  • This is great, reminds me of Nick Cave when he was their age

  • Comment removed

  • @pleximold You know - it's one thing to say you like the cover (which I do, personally, think is rather bad), but I REALLY don't see anything similar when I look at old videos of The Birthday Party

  • Ohh, you mangled a classic there lads...

  • Loses all the ominousness of Cave's original.

  • i would bone them to blonds in the bra and nickers, just though i would share that with yas

  • impossible to compare,but its good!!!

  • as far as im concerned, when a band covers a track they do it in thier own style- or its only a tribute act. This doesnt hold a candle to the original, but i think its still quite good........

  • at least they got the organ solo in and mostly right but I am not impressed with this cover at all. It has none of the soul of Nicks version.

  • Having heard the original this rates 1 on my 'Meh' scale. Nick Cave blows them away with a twitch of his eyebrow.....

  • damn, this here is garbage!

  • I like the Arctic Monkeys but this is not good...

  • shit

  • good cover, doesnt quite have the evilness that cave has in his vocal, but good job none the less.

  • Look, for fuck's sake. You may not fucking like it, but it's originallity, so you can't call it a shit, awful, bad etc. cover.

  • The two versions are so different it's pretty hard to even compare them. The song's awesome because it works both ways.

  • Apparently im deaf on the left ear

  • i certainly dig this

  • better than nick cave

  • sounds shit compared to Nick Cave's version.

  • Soulless vocals. Sounds like he was on remote and wanted to be somewhere else.

    Nick Cave is God; AM are monkeys

    That's the difference.

  • if u look up "how to kill one fo the best songs ever written" in the dictionary - this video will be immediately imprinted on ur retinas.

  • shit!!!

    f.. you !

  • Oh my god everyone on this is so obnoxious...

    Look, you may or may not like the cover, but you can NOT say it's a shit cover...

    it changed the style completely, made it more energetic and funner to listen to, which is deffinetly better than covering it and getting it to a T...

    Covering something to sound like the original is a bad cover, this is not a bad cover...

    Some people prefer this and some Nick Cave, but the only people wrong here are the ones calling it shit...

  • its shit.

  • Idiot.

  • sorry lol could not resist.

    oh btw

    its shit.

    :D

  • first time hearing the arctic monkeys. no joke. not a bad cover though.

  • not bad, not bad at all but not in the same league with nick caves version.

  • great cover....better than the nick cave version.

  • no.

  • that's imposible to be better...

  • I'm surprised. It's actually pretty good :)

  • yeah... where is john ashton?.. hahah

    i wish arctic monkeys send to fuck john ashton.. he is messing the unique 4 dudes band... alex can make the synth tunes..they dont need him.

  • actually not bad for what it is

  • well that was a bastardization of that kick ass song!

  • thanks for all the comments people! im very very sorry for the mono sound. but i never imagined that i would be the only person in the country to record the performance and upload it. i actually still have a couple of songs from the set to upload, i will do that over the holidays sometime.

  • mud-blood?

    she's not in harry potter mate

  • Oh dear....you twats.

  • fucking butchered that song

  • What is the last thing he says before he starts singing?

  • fuck it!

  • Haha, yeah, i thought so - although its more like "fook it!"

  • @tellytubies123 FUCK IT!!!!!!!

  • FucKinG CooL!!!

    ++

  • FUCKIN AWEEEEEEEEEEEEFUL!!!! WHAT A FUCKIN MESS. cant beleive drummers got a converge t shirt on aswell.

  • great cover, destroys the original

  • The original was tasteful and had an awesome atmosphere to it. You can't compare, this is crap.

  • this is great. i am a big nick cave fan (not huge on the monkeys) but the band this most reminds me of (turners excellent vox aside) are q.o.t.s.a., who pwn both of them.

    fucking yes!

  • its not like the original i like both for different reasons

  • Cave's original reigns supreme.

  • amazing!!!

  • this is the shit!

  • have you been sniffing some coke or usmet this is a fucking masterpiece of a cover and beats the original by about 50 miles

  • you obviously dont like nick cave mate!

  • love nick cave & arctic monkeys but do not think they should've attempted this :S

  • i can understand that fans of nick cave don't find this very good, but i find this version superior to the original.

  • you know what mate i agree , nick caves is terrible its slow its boring this ones upbeated and a very very good tune i personally think like you that this is . superior.

  • the song hears fancy whith this guys, i don´t like this version

  • Comment removed

  • OMG.. Alex needs a haircut !! xD

  • Love nick cave and the arctic monkeys!

  • surprisingly good

  • i like arctic monkeys a lot. But not this cover. Nick cave is a lot better

  • @janwillemroos

    completely agree. it was a bad idea covering this song.

  • FUCK IT!

  • You're A Moron, Shut Up...

  • i absolutely adore how this still counts as a twelve bar blues :D

  • top stuff

  • And the girl on the right at the beginning is FIT

  • 8 thumbs up if i could

  • Just couldn't agree more, mate.

  • Neither better nor worse than the original. Good cover, and I love them to bits

  • P.S. I also have a yorkshire accent

  • I can't take this song seriously with that fucking yorkshire accent.

  • HAH! I'm actually with you on that. Musically it's not bad, but the vocals are irritating the fuck out of me.

  • Man, I'm impressed by that. When I read "Arctic Monkeys covering Red Right Hand" I was pure doubt but that was excellent

  • Respect!

  • I quite like AM but this version is wank. Nick Cave any day!

  • great vid

    Ive just favourited it ;)

  • its funny cos u think that "some" and "one"! will rhyme but not the way alex sings it

  • bonus track on the japanese edition of humbug

  • alex looks strange without a guitar

  • give some food to alex, he looks really bad

  • You just made my day! That's the most meaningful comment around. :-D!

    ps. who cares what all you tykes think about this version or Nick Cave's version for that matter. It's a song, there a band, they've covered it. Either like it, or don't.

  • I don't know the original version of this.

    but I still like to hear Arctic Monkeys singing it. Very nice.

  • You should check the original...Very good version from the monkeys but Cave 's original is much darker...

  • ma stiamo scherzando??? questi sono dei coglioni che rovinano l'atmosfera del bellisimo pezzo di nick cave. cazzo che schifosi. indie del cazzo

  • ma tu vai in giro per youtube a insultare e dire cazzate...povero sfigato

  • ti manca il kilometraggio amico

  • i recently went to a Nck Cave concert and they played Red Right Hand but i like this cover a lot better than Nick Cave's life performance but its still got nothing on the Red Right Hand album version though!!!!

  • does anyone know what jamie is doing at 3:20 to get that sound?

  • epic!!!

  • i hope they put this as a b-side on 1 of the new singles:D

  • me too. the keyboard at the end is so awesome.

  • they better do, their versioon's awesomeeee

  • big respect for guys for covering such a great artist with success. I never was a big fan of Arctic Monkeys, but this made me start listening to them.

  • I love it - I don't dig the sheffield accent though

  • i really like it :D

  • i like the arctic monkeys and nick cave but this is shit

  • if you don't like this version, don't listen to it.

    Don't get so angry over a song.

  • audio ta meio estranho

  • Love The Arctic Monkeys, Love Nick Cave. But I'm sorry this cover just doesn't work for me.

  • all grown up XD

  • the origional is too slow matt pretty much made a new drum peice 4 this

  • no sorry i mean put me in a terrorpocket

  • yeah definitely

  • omg dus any 1 notice the way the first verse soundS REALLY lik wot alex sings after de organ intro 2 pretty visitors??????????

  • is the guitarist wearing a Eagles of Death Metal t-shirt? if he is bad ass and bad ass for covering a nick cave song! hopefully doing this cover will expose Cave to new listeners who are unaware of his excistence. for he is a true artist

  • yeah he is wearing an EODM t-shirt.. if you look for a backstage vid of them at big day out youll see him wearing it up close

  • They should slow down their tempo for a change, at least see how they can handle material at a slower pace.

  • their new album is gonna have much more slow songs, i think they just did this song faster than the original to make it more unique

  • this is just...wrong.

  • AM kill´s the song. Cave´s song it´s much better.

  • Horrible cover!

  • what model is jaime's guitar there?

  • i think that's a gretsch spectra sonic

  • wicked

  • jamie with his sleeveless top aha, turning into josh homme. oh well I ain't bothered I love queens of the stone age. and this is awsome. I love arctic.

  • why the fuck is everyone complaining about which is better..,

    peopple are getting into nick cave because of arctic monkeys aswell...

    this is a great cover, tbh i dont think the bad seeds can do these drums or this guitar..

    it's all opinion...

  • Its a good cover, the guitar lines not perticular hard, just distorted, blixa could have it easy.

  • i know it aint hard, but i still can't say that the bad seeds show that they can be that good haha

    the bass is average aswell...

    the drums sound fucking hard though : / haha

  • aha, as far as doing nick cave justice, i like it alot, nice to see people in the main stream doing good covers of good music. I'll love these lads for doing that, nice to see there against all this poppy bull shit.

  • haha yeah, they're fucking great

    in it for the music, it's good to see there are still people like that today

  • This is a bit of a disaster, though the instrumental but around 3.00 isn't as badly mangled as the vocals. Still, Nick Cave is pretty exceptional, and there are few out there that can muster up the same swampy, gothic, bluesy, punky shout-cum-drawl that he can. AM are a good band, but shouldn't try RRH for a while...10yrs of booze, cigarettes and heroin would help get the vocals right...

  • too bad its only heard in the right speaker.. wonder what the problem is cause the rest vids from this gig is also in the right speaker (sorry.. cant think of the right words, pan?)

  • personally I think this cover is very good, they've done their own thing with it, which I think works rly well

    im not going to compare it to the original, because their different, and good in their own ways

  • i agree, the menacing fuzz goes well with the lyrics

  • Not my favorite song by them. I remember whatever people say.... I was addicted like a heroin addict to that record, and I liked the second one but not as much as the first. When this third one comes out they will be truly judged and all that shit, but just like their style in the beginning they'll act as if they don't give a shit and fuck their model girlfriends. Hope the record good though and the best of luck to em.

  • lol. He sounds like George Formby in the beginning

  • This cover is terrible...

    But still, kudos for trying

  • I disagree. Even better than the original. Just awesome.

  • You're clearly deranged

  • not absolute not better than the original, but cool that they like nick cave

  • Yeah deffinetly is..

    i had a listen to the original because of hearing this one..

    it's growing on me but i still think it's no where near as good as this cover...

    so tbh, i dont know why Nick Cave fans are complaining, arctic's are technically supporting Nick Cave in a way...

    fucking great cover though :)

  • lol, i think generally people are inclined to like whichever version they heard first... all the AM fans like this version best, and all the Nick Cave fans, who heard the other version first, are liking that more.

    It happens with most covers. this one is pretty good, but a lot of covers really don't do the song justice. I bet a lot of the Cave fans feel that way, so they're entitled to complain if they want.

    ...

    though personally i like the nick cave version best :P

  • very good point actually

    'cause after hearing it, and you like it, the other version won't seem right because you're used to the other voice

    the only bad cover i've ever heard which involves arctic monkeys, is the kooks covering despaire in the departure loung

    that is an awful cover

    very true

    and fair dose haha

  • I think I like it for completely different reasons than the nick cave one. Nick's version puts me in a trance... this one gets me up and gets me moving... both are needed emotive states... IMHO...

  • This is a truly appalling cover version. It doesn't work at all, but it's no surprise really. When looking up to the level of Nick Cave, it's like they're trying to perform a Beethoven symphony with a knackered acoustic guitar. Utterly ridiculous.

  • Nick's is still the standard IMO, but this is damn good just the same.

  • i would hate that if i stand behind those skanks

  • lol you mean the bikini-clad, bleach-blond, gum-chewing, potential-groupie stereotypes? Girls like that never get respect, boys just act nice but don't care about them.

  • nowhere near as good as the original but a pretty cool rendition nonetheless. i dig it.

  • Comment removed

  • crap, cave is better

  • yeah but this version aint crap its alrite

  • if someone gets into Nick Cave as a result of hearing this then it can't be bad.

  • jamie's using alex's gretsch

    great song

  • Very nice

  • yeah but tlsp is cool to

  • never seen al on stage without a guitar

  • He looks like he doesn't know what to do with his hands.

  • totally!

  • This cover is much better

  • is that jamie still on guitar

    looks well different

  • im tryin to learn this by ear on guitar, anyone wanna help ?

  • I like darker Arctic Monkeys, they're a whole lot better. Organs, heavy guitars a la Daniel Ash, Mercyless pounding on the drums, oh yes, almost gothic post-punk, gotta love this! Behind are the naive young boys...finally a band of the new post-punk scene moves on!

  • u said it :)