Added: 2 years ago
From: iniloy1993
Views: 63,366
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,016)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I came here just to listen to the song.

  • Lampard at his peak is better than Fabregas at the moment. I would welcome someone to give me some evidence to suggest otherwise. Lampard's best season 27 goals/ 20 assists. Fabregas's best season 19 goals/ 19 assists or 13 goals/ 22 assists.

    Fabregas has many years ahead of him and perhaps he will achieve greater things but for now he hasn't. So I think it's fair to say that rating a player of 24 in the same category as a PL legend at the end of his career is both premature and insulting.

  • fabregas is a legend, he is the best, and he is only 24 years old.

  • omg lamards not a legend hes 37 hes getting better and hes gonna retire when hes 45 still a long life ahead of him

  • omg people that say fabregas is better than lampard there wrong lampards overall is 87 and fabregas overall is 86 just like drogba and torres wow people that dont know this are dumb asses

  • Is this a joke??? Lampard is not in Fabregas' class! I'm tired of people on youtube trying to compare him to Fabregas, Xavi, or even Gerrard. He is one of the most overraated players in sports!

  • Lampard is a legend for Chelsea

  • lampard

    

  • And this is why england will never win anything important again . i am english but we have to realise that we always overatte our players . fabregas is better than lampard all day of the week

  • Fabregas is better.

  • Lampard!

    Over the last 10 years he has played the most games of any player in the PL, the most wins, second most assists, highest scoring midfielder. Voted second place in both the 2005 FIFA World Player of the Year and the 2005 Ballon d'Or. England player of the year 2004 and 2005. Top scorer for England in 2006 World Cup qualifying. The most prolific penalty taker ever for England. Scored in a CL final.

    In 2009, he was named the Premier League's Player of the decade by official statistics.

  • @ZolaMagic25 fabregas has had the most assists in europe for the last 5 years, he is better then lampard at the same age aswell, and unlike lampard can do it internationally.

  • @GamerGarden

    Fabregas is a great player and it's true he has the most assists in Europe over the past 5 years but they are entirely different players. Lampard is a box to box midfielder who plays in the hole behind the strikers, whereas Fabregas is a playmaker.

    Lampard is unrivalled in terms of goals scored by a midfielder and over the past decade he has scored 20+ goals in almost every season. There is not one midfielder in the world over the past decade who can rival that.

  • @ZolaMagic25 well for one if you had a team and you could choose between lampard and fabregas not even at his peak i would choose fabregas, lampard also has a nack of dissapearing in games yet still geting the odd game, fabregas can control a whole match.

    About your second para, many midfeilders have moved clubs therefore damaging their ability, kaka at milan was far better then lampard, and cesc at barca is going to score 20 plus goals for the rest of his seasons, he is already on 11.

  • @GamerGarden

    Obviously you have your opinion but since when has Lampard got a knack of disappearing in games? You can't have 20+ 15+ assists every season and have a knack of disappearing in games. I have watched Lampard over the past ten years and that's wrong. Lampard has scored in many Cup finals, including CL final and he always rises to the big occassions.

  • @ZolaMagic25 yes you can, look at berbatov, top goal scorer last seaosn yet most games he was invsible. Lampar internationally is useless, has never been as good as gerrad or fabregas internatonally, so your poitn on rising to big occasions is wrong...pardon the pselling keyboard acting up

  • @GamerGarden

    That's a ridiculous comparison! Berbatov's job is to score goals...!? He scored 19 and that is unusually low for a Golden Boot in the PL. This is also an example of 1 season, an anomally. To perform consistently over a decade is not an anomally.

  • @ZolaMagic25 were talkng about playrs who stats my b good bu dnt turn up n bg gams hence why i mentioned berbatov. Berbatov also so4red 19 with considerably less games then other strikers.

  • @GamerGarden

    Internationaly England are awful but to say Lampard is useless? He has been by far one of the best performers for England. He was England player of the year in 2004 and 2005. He was top scorer for England in 2006 World Cup qualifying and he is the highest scoring penalty taker in the national team's history.

    Fabregas has hardy had an international career apart from being a substitute and squaring a simple pass to Iniesta in the WC final. Lol.

  • @ZolaMagic25 lampard has been shit for england, he has never been a great player for england and everyone knows that and he himself acknowledges that, you need to actually watch him.

    Lampard never scored in a world cup so please dont lie and talkshit, m here to talk facts no crap mate. Pretty sure fabregas s a better performer internationally then lampard and substtute, its span midfield, their 3rd twam coudl get nto england midfeild.

  • @GamerGarden ikr cesc and even arteta would walk into englands midfield

  • @GamerGarden

    Btw Gerrard internationally? You seriously need to start watching some football because Gerrard has been very poor for England over the last few years.

    My point on Lampard rising to the big occassions is proven fact. How can you say that? It is one of his qualities and his record speaks for itself. Even when England were knocked out by Germany in the WC, Lampard had a great game and also WC 2006 he had the most shots of the tournament in another terrible side.

  • @ZolaMagic25 yeah idnt lamapr not score but gerrad dd, gerrad scored more and hade more assists for england, gerrad was playing on the right and stll out performed lampard. Lmapard s constantly rubbsh for england and ask any1 apart from a chelsea fan and they say gerrad s not only better nternationally but better player. Lampard was crap for england hence why hs place will be taken by wilshere

  • @GamerGarden

    Kaka at his peak was better but that didn't last long and I definitely wouldn't have said that for a while now. Despite that, Lampard has more goals and assists in every single season than Kaka had at Milan. In 2005 Lampard was statistically the best player in the world but he came 2nd to Ronaldinho both World Player of the Year and Ballon d'Or.

    In the end people are more than entitled to their opinions but the simple fact is that stats don't lie

  • @ZolaMagic25 unlike lampar both kaka and ronaldnho dnt take eve4ry sgnle set pece and free kick whch added toward ther stats like lamaprd ther were other better people to do that unlike at chelsea were besdes drogba lamaprd as the main dead ball specalst.

    Berbatov was top scorer last season, he must also be the best strker in epl last seasonl. Koscielny has the best tacklng record thiss season he must be the best cb, f you think stats dont lie

  • @GamerGarden

    Fabregas has a long way to go to match Lampard's achievements. The fact he plays for the best team in the world can only help him but he hasn't achieved anything yet and I doubt he will ever score 20+ goals a season on a regular basis because he isn't that type of player.

    Lampard has 11 goals this season too... He has also not featured in a number of games and has been used as a substitute on a few occassions.

    Even more impressive than Fabregas then!

  • @ZolaMagic25 fabregas has surpassed lampard achievements, fabregas shnes. stats as you say dont lie. fabreags 09-10 19goals 19 asssts n 36 gamesin 51 games lampard 27 goals, 20 assists showing Faberge achieves greater in less games so how has fabregas got far to achieve when still younger has surpassed lampard. Fabregas played 1 more game then lamaprd ths season mostly out of position and has got more assists and goals then fabregas .There not the same player yet fabregas does better

  • the only reason Lampard has better stats is because he's averaged 15 games more per season than Fabregas has. The last time they played roughly the same number of games was 07/08, when Lampard was in his prime. He had 10 goals and 8 assists compared to Fabregas' 7 goals and 19 assists.

    Also, Fabregas will be the same player when he's 34 as when he's 24, because like Xavi, he relies on vision not athleticism to play. I think it's even between the two, but Fabregas will play his best for longer

  • i don't know. both are really good. but lampard is more experient

  • Lampard better fabregas with arsenal never was able to win the top teams in england and never got close to win a champions league lampard did but never was able to climb that one step that said 1st instead of 2

  • Lampard is like 34.... Fabgregas is 10 years younger you dumb retards

  • Lampard!

  • when both in their prime, Lampard by far!

  • Comment removed

  • lampard is wat better! u cant match his contributions witih fabregas, lampard scores 15+ goals and provides 10+assists in each and every fucking season even at his age. lampard is god

  • Comment removed

  • fuck dud's lampard is gud in football, who is fabrigas any way !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • fuck u guys...lamprd da best .....fabre is just young..lucky for him....lampard best d best...just think fuckers....lamprd has everything to be perfect,when he retires he will legend....if fabregas retires,,he can just make tea in the kitchen...

  • Is this title a JOKE?

    I aint spanish but fabregas > lampard by far.

  • goals win u games and lampard give you more goals and plays more games bitchessss

  • fabreags age dudes!!!! he has done so well and he will soon be the greatest but i still think lamps comes no where near fabregas!

  • lampard shit

  • fabregas shits on lampard any day

  • if you're talking play making then Fabregas no question,

    Lampard with Chelsea since 01= 108 assits

    Fabregas since 04= 100 assits

    not to mention Fabregas isn't old so he has all the more time to overtake him

  • @KingZidane92

    So we are only rating in terms of assists?

    Well if you're talking goals scored, then Lampard no question.

    Lampard - 1 goal every 2.9 games in the PL (highest scoring midfiedler in PL history)

    Fabregas - 1 goal every 6.05 games in the PL

  • @KingZidane92 Lampard scores way more goals.

  • @KingZidane92 Lampard is a legend and has proven him self more

    but I think Lampard is the better goal scorer and ces playmaker

  • who r we kiding now man?? compare 23 yr old lampard to this fabrigas? no compare this lampard to fabregas, lampard may score more goals cz he takes all the penelties but seriesly dude they r 2 complete different players its like comparing scholes and carick Cesco is way quicker, faster, and skillful then lampard don't just look the goals look at the player every team would take fabrigas over lampard even chalsea would do that if they can

  • Lampard > Random Kid > Fabregas

  • Fabregas ;)

  • fabregas is overrated. last season he didnt do great. lampard is consistent look at his career and the amount of goals he scores every season from a non-attacking position really. pretty class when u score 20+ a season. noone else comes close maybe a gerrard. lamps underrated, more trophies then that cunt fabra

  • @matt61234666 17 assists and 9 goals isn't great >__> compared to lampards 13 goals 6 assists

    not to mention lampard is also chelsea penalty taker

  • Lampard when he was 24 rapes Fabregas and Lampard scored 23 goals and 14 assists (highest assists in pl) in 09-10 season.

    BTW Lampard has been the 2nd best player in the world and has won the best player in pl medal loads of times, wheres FabreGAYs?

  • At 23, Cesc has 35 league goals for the Gunners, and at the same age, Gerrard and Lampard had 20 and 12 respectively

  • compare fabregas to a 23 year old lampard, no comparison fabregas is way better

  • Such a stupid comparision, Lampard is 10 years older. It's like comparing Paul Scholes to Iniesta. It's retarded and so are you!

  • fabregas is wwwwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaayy­yyyyyyyyyyyyy better bcaus he is more yong+skills+speed.

  • fabregas is better because is waaaaay younger than lampard +he plays better,he's faster and helpful,franck lampard is special cuz he nows how to shoot well and way more than fabregas but fabregas still better in short passes in long passes,in dribbling,in speed and in assisting and i want to remind you that cesc scored 15 goals and assisted 15 times and lampard 22 goals with no assist that means lampard plays as an AM or SS but cesc plays defensive and attacking in the same time!thumbs up :D

  • @TheMohd1999 cesc cant play defending he is at his best when he is behind rvp, while lampard has better long passes because he is more rutined, but if they were the same age fabregas would win

  • Lampard? lol. Isn't on the same level as Fabregas, never was.

  • Fabregas is better

    Where the fuck is lampard world cup medal ????

    Fabregas set up the winning goal for spain in the final of the world cup.

    Fabregas has made over 100 assists for Arsenal FC at the age of 24.

    Fabregas also haas won the Euro medal.

    Shouldnt even be compared fabregas is above his class compared to overrated englsih players such as lampard and gerrard.

  • @usopp13 where the fuck is cescs premier league medal, where is cescs champions league medal huh? shut he fuck up bitch

  • Lampard is better by a mile

  • no oye chavo estas muy maal como te atreves a comparar a fabregas con lampard todos sabemos q fabregas es mehor qee lampard mas aparte es mas joven fabregas tiene mas vision de campo deberias de comparar a lampard cn felaini jaja ahi si te la paso jaja y a fabregas con iniesta ahi si esta peliado chavo disculpate y vete mehor

  • i wonder how stupid is compare fabregas to lampard.. compare a player with good skills but walk on the pitch to an always totally committed and crucial player as lampard. stupid discussion.

  • lampard only scores goals, fabregas has great leadership quality

  • @TheRandomCHEEZE leadership dont win you games man thats why arsenal dont win a shit

  • Lampsie (:

  • Cesc Fabregas is the best!

  • fabregas the best

  • 2009/10 season:

    Lampard: goals: 22. assists: 17

    Fabregas: goals: 15. assists: 15

  • both amazing players, lampards better though

  • LAMPARD OF COURSE !!

  • Fabregas is uncomparable with Lampard! Frank is a legend and has proved his abilities in the past 10 years! Fabregas is good but hasn't really proved it over a longer time or a whole season. Lampard is a more complete player than Fabregas and is simply better. Cesc is also world class but Lamps is the BEST!

  • Lampard is too slow. He's been propped up by his team-mates at Chelsea and let the media praises go to his head.Cesc has much better vision, much better awareness and won the World Cup with his country. Let's see Frank do that...

  • @jetlifari Fabregas didn't start a single match for Spain. At least Lampard scored...kinda...

  • @rockstarofspades But he did put in the clinical pass that led to the 1-0 over the Netherlands though...

  • fabregas hands down

  • FRANCESC FABREGAS SOLER - PILOTA D BOLA, EL MEJOR, THE BEST, O MELHOR, LE MEILLEUR........

  • no doubts cesc. way better

  • people are such morons, lampard is over rated, fabregas is the best midfielder in the world PROVEN FACT!!!!!

  • @theandroinvader Schweinsteiger, Iniesta, Gerrard, Xavi, Scholes, Ribery, Robben, Sneijder, and especially Lampard are better than Cesc. Fabregas is probably one of the most overrated players in the world, but blind Arsenal fans won't see that until he leaves for Barcelona.

  • @rockstarofspades Yeah man i see that you know really much about football, go and learn some football before speaking. Retard

  • fabregas all day long lool lampard is only good at timing his runs into the box and finishing but fabregas is a wonderfull player

  • are u crazy? fabregas is obviously better

  • lamps has lately been playing SHIT but thats because all of chelsea have been playing shit but on the other hand fab has been playing fab cus arsenal have been playing well but you guys are right fab is still young but he has a lot to achieve but lamps wins this one only cus of age but i stll prefer fab

  • lamapard is way too old, favregas is young, you cannot compare the two yet

  • I am a gooner and I admit Lampard is better than fabregas, much better. Well fabregas has a chance of coming close to lampard when he gets older. Lamps is a legend and ideal midfielder, fabregas has a long way to go.

  • Lampard is miles better than this peice of rubbish fabregas. Arsenal fans, Lampard is the all-time topscoring midfielder and assister in the Premier league, and he has won many POTY awards. He was second in 2005 World POTY. Come back when fabregas comes even close to Lampard's success. Fools!

  • @BAKTR19 fabregas has won the worls cup and set up the winnig goal, come back to me when lampard those the sam

  • Frankie!

  • Fabregas.. He is such for versitile thean Lampard.

  • The age difference. Fabregas is 23.Lamaprd is 32.do you notice it?9 years my friend.And I believe fabregas edges it out against lampard with they way they are playing right now.And the game against Arsenal and chelsea.3-1.Fabregas played way better.1 goal 1 assist.Lampard,Where was he??Singing Chelsea sucks with the fans?

  • Of all time Lampard is way better, right now Fabregas, for now, But Lamps is probably the 7th best player of all time, Cesc isn't even close.

  • @GlamCaramel CESC is the best lampard sucks

  • @GlamCaramel Are you serious

  • @GlamCaramel Ähhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh NOO !

  • @GlamCaramel Are you kidding me?

    What did Lampard do for England?

    Players like Zidane are the best of all time.

    Zidane dominated every match he played in France.

    See?No Zidane = no world cup for France.

    Lampard is nothing off al time.

    Maybe best of Chelsea all time.

  • @GlamCaramel 7th best what?? player?? haha fuck off henry, viera zidane ronaldo messi c.ronaldo pele 7 players that are easily better

  • @GlamCaramel 7th best player of all time in what? chelsea?

  • @GlamCaramel buahahaha you wish. 7th best player of all time? loool i though you were kdding when i read it

  • @GlamCaramel At age 33 Lampard has had 86 premier league assists and at age 24 Fabregas has had 80. Lampard doesn't come close to 7th best player of all time, in my opinion he is just another overrated English player. What can he do that Fabregas can't?

  • @GlamCaramel Lol that is funny. Fat Frank Lampard is so overrated it's unreal. Fabregas is better than Lampard ever was!

  • @Darmorish shut up faggot lampard scored more than all ass-anal players put together

  • @Darmorish shut up faggot lampard scored more than all ass-anal players put together

  • @MrAthul22 Yeah, a shitload of penalties. Lampard was always greedy, often takes the chance himself whereas Fabregas fashions chances for others.

  • Arsenal 3 - Chelsea 1

    Fabregas scores a goal and makes an assist for walcott.

    Fabregas is better.

  • Lampard!!!!!!!!

  • its so obvuis who is better !!! LAMPARD !!! he did alot this years no middlefielder did , no gerrard or fabregas or gigs is better from him or kaka he is num 1 guys

  • Lampard scores goals and distributes. Fabregas distributes and gets injured.

  • @YawBoyGotIt

    funny guy

    fabregas is so much better then lampard

    fabregas is 23 and world class , lampard was no where near that level

    fabregas is overall a better player

  • Oh and at least Lampard stays fit more often than Fabergas, what good is Fabergas when he is on the bench. Other than this season, I cant remember when Lampard missed a string of games.

  • Slightly different roles n the middle of the park, but I gotta go with my own personal bias and say Lampsy.

  • lampard the best

  • frank lampard all the way...stats dont lie most goals from midfield in pl ever

  • CESC FABREGAS stomps on lampard

  • fabregas

    

  • cesc fabulous

  • abdul123456789100 no, you shut up. chelsea is much much better than arsenal, that's why chelsea is in the top of premier league ahahahahaha.

  • cesc fabregas is of course

  • Cesc of course!

  • of course,Cesc is better!!;) Go Gunners!

  • Ps3fanboywellhada36 no. fabregas is good but lampard is way better. and chelsea is much better than arsenal. :P

  • @CatarinaCardosoCR7 um yeah. 3-1 Arsenal, so who's better? arsenal and fabregas (1 goal 1 assist)

  • @xSoCcEr10z motherfuka wht bout da previous games we played u biatchh

  • Cese is better and has still got so much to give to football !!!

  • Fabregas scored his first goal when he was 16 and he was called the youngest player that ever scored in the BPL

  • LAMPARD THE LEGEND!!

  • cesc ... u r the best ,, ^ ^

  • LAMPARD

  • Lamps :D

  • fuck off who scored 23 pl goals last season lampard who had more assists lampard lampards much better

  • FABREGAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!

  • fabregas shits on lampard

  • @fkyou902 yeah thats because he is so scared of Frank Lampard

  • @fkyou902 fabregas wastes many opportunities so lampard is still better than him

  • how is it even a question? fabregas, without hesitation.

  • @barcelonaboy9 Thank u very much.

  • Fabregas. Hands Down,

  • if you think lampard then go and stuff urself fabregas all day every day for the rest of there lives so just admit fabregas number 1 the champ of all football

  • SIR ALEX FERGUSON: "Frank Lampard is an exceptional player - a huge asset to Chelsea," . "You pay attention to players who can get goals from midfield and he's been averaging 20 a season.

    Jose mourinho: Frank lampard is the best professional i have ever worked with.

  • Lampard is entitled to take penalties you fool. He has been at chelsea longer than drogba his penalty record is one of the best in the world and can fabregas get all those goals every season....NO. lampard is so much better mate. your saying who set up wc winning goal are you telling me that was a great pass it was average spain was good enough to get to the final unlike england who cant work together for shit.

  • @shutit94 oy fuckface hes been scoring 20 goals a season when the likes of fukin drogba, essien were at the club. take out drogba and essien and put lampard on the pitch then we will see if chelsea are as strong as ppl say they are and also we will find out if hes score 20 goals a season. when was the last time chelsea beat arsneal without drogba havin to play ??? cant even remember thatz how bad it is.

  • @usopp13 AND HE STILL SCORES BIATCH!!!

  • @1274536 yh he still scores them penalties. Lamps is a fantastic player but i think Fabregas is better at this moment in time. u can even admit wen lampard was Fabregas age he waz never gd. lampard became gd wen Jose mournho took over. but still he score some great goals like the one in the nou camp i remember was gd. btw i dont get wat ur sayin about lampard is the xavi /iniesta plus extra. if u tellin me u think lampard is better than xavi and iniesta then dude u got a problem.

  • fabregas

  • Fabregas Cause hes a Boss and hes done so much and he aint even 25 and hes won the world cup ;). and in 2-4 years time wilshere will be better than lampard FACT or is he better than him now?lol

  • @KILLBILL984 Your completly right. Fabregas has much better vision than Lampard, Stats don't lie. And his goals to games ratio is much better. I'm sorry, everyone is entitled to their own opinion but u just can't imagine Lampard doing a run like Cesc did against spurs. He's an absolute masterclass, he can carry a team on his own, has great skill, movement which cant be said about Lampard. I think a better comparison would be Iniesta or Xavi vs Cesc.

  • LAMPARD

  • Fabregas

    No Two ways about it, chelsea fans will say Lampard but what do they know?

    if they think Lampard is better then they quite clearly did not watch the World Cup!!

    He did not do a thing, where as the Cesc Pistol is involved in every match and will bring more to the plate in the first 5 minuites of one game, than Lampard did in the whole world cup.

  • @ChamakhhAttackk Who Scored A Screamer Against Germany?

  • @ChamakhhAttackk You cannot look at a players performance in the WC and decide whether he's good based on that. Capello cannot find a formation which would fit Gerrard and Lampard so Lampard cannot play as well as he plays for Chelsea.

    Lamps is incredibly intelligent, has amazing vision on the pitch and can guarantee 20-25 goals per season - every season. Lampard is a very consistent midfielder and a very reliable one.

    Cesc is still young and will become better but right now, Lampard is king.

  • @snoopyt7 Ok, it was a bit unfair of me to say what do Chelsea fans know, because football is all about opinions. I Kno u cant really look at a world cup performance, because Capello did get it wrong. But in a big game, e.g. Inter Milan last season, he was completly out of the game, Sneijder absolutely dominated that entire game and Lampard didn't get a kick. When he's got Mikel And Essien in front of him, it makes him look better than he actually is.

  • @ChamakhhAttackk check lampard's record then check fabregas' record you will see frank lampard's is clearly better and you will also soon see that chamakh is shit

  • @shutit94 Already have mate, Goals to game ratio Fabregas' is better. Will soon see Chamakh is shit? well tbf he's played 10 games and scored 5 i purposely watched him in the champions league last season and he scored 5 there. Against good oposition. So why will i soon see? if he hadn't scored already this season then i would still give him time. Anyway how can u say anythin? All those flops chelsea wasted money on! Schevchenko, Crespo.

  • @shutit94 Also, just because chamakh doesn't score every game like the £23-50 million players chelsea buy means he isn't good. There are diffrent type of strikers u know, Players who hold it up and play off midfielders. He gives Arsenal something diffrent in the box, instead of being one dimmensional all the time. For a free aswell, i think thats pretty good business. Javier Hernandez-thats a shit player, who couldn't get in the Mexican wc team till Vela got injured.

  • @ChamakhhAttackk can fabregas get 20 goals plus for 6 seasons in a row like frank can? i dont think he can. you say lampard only looks good because of essien but is that why arguably the best manager in the world wanted to take him to inter and real madrid. im not saying fabregas isnt good but he is not on Lampard's level and yes i can say chamakh is shit. Fair enough he's scored against the likes of these small champions league sides and PL sides. I agree with you about hernandez

  • @ChamakhhAttackk also did you watch chelsea vs arsenal. Chamakh is meant to be good in the air and he missed to free headers vs chelsea to get his team back in it....il admit i shouldnt have said he is shit but he aint good enough.

  • @shutit94 20 goals in a season my ass the guy fukin gets his goals thru penalties. tell him to be a man and score proper goals and let drogba take penalties. 22 goals last season 10 from penalties take away his goals from the spot he ends up with 12. Fabregas scores 15 3 from penalty spot take them 3 goals he scored from spot and he ends up with 12 also. Fabregas assist ratio is ten times better than lampard. At this moment in time. Who set up the wining goal in the final of WC ??? case closed.

  • @shutit94 Lampard is a gd player tho no doubt about it. i think Fabregas is ten times better. Lamaprd is surrounded by world class players such as Essien , malouda and Drogba. Fabregas has to lead Arsenal team out and we all kno arsenal squad isnt as strong as chelseas. he makes the team tick wen we realy need it. he provides them killer passes wen arsenal realy need it.

  • @usopp13 that is as stupid as me saying fabregas and gerrard only look good because everyone else around them is shit. and i find it funny the way u lot are on his dick after he was begging to join barcelona.

  • @shutit94 its funny that he wants to join barcalona but also i wonder why barca didnt make an attempt ever to prize lampard away from chelsea. Barca kno lamaprd isnt as gd as Fabregas even wen lamaprd was fabregas age he waz shit. he only started playin well wen fukin mourinho came and took carge of chelsea ?? tru or false. and yes it waz a greatt pass u shithead if he didnt make that pass to iniesta maybe spain wouldnt be world champions right now. why would u be judging chamakh nw ???

  • @usopp13 you are the dumbest person i have ever had a converstation with oh youtube. Why are barcelona going to attempt to buy lampard when they know he is chelsea through and through you donut the only reason they want cesc is cause he used to be at barca u silly cunt plus he is more like barca's kind of midfielder.and of course if u take away essien and drogba we wouldn't be as strong because they are two of our best players.take away arshavin and nasri we'l see how could cesc is. FOOL

  • @shutit94 so ur basically sayin that because lamapard score 20 goals a season that proves he is better than Cesc Fabregas yh. ok if thats the case we might as well say lampard is better than Xavi and Iniesta. FOOOL.

  • @usopp13 for me he is SAY SOMETHING WHAT LAMPARD HAS WHAT INIESTA AND XAVI HAVE THE 1 IN A GENERATION VISION BUT HAS SOMETHING MORE THE VISION FOR GOAL SO HE IS A XAVI/INIESTA PLUS EXTRA

  • @shutit94 dude he is 30 cesc is only 23 . frank achieved nothing at 23

  • FABREGAS !