This wont work: You need energy to make Hydrogen out of Water. Space ships are flying with Hydrogen and oxygen and the smoke that comes out is Water(steam). Its like you are trying to make an engine running with Co2.
@DerStiffler94 its already been proven an gas guzzling internal combustion engine can run on hyfrogen. BMW did it with the Hydrogen 7 .. Mythbusters did it to an old car with a bottle of it injecting it into the carbourator with a hose....
It is quite possible.. as long as the engine is running, its alternator(s) are producing electricty.. electrolysis use's electricity and splits Hydrogen and oxygen from water..
I'd say its a pretty unique 100% recycleable system
@Me102288 U need a massive amount of energy to splits the Hydrogen and oxygen. The alternator cannot produce enough electricity. It like you trying to have over 100% of efficiency. Not possible.
@neerajmjj 2 volts per plate gap depending on its construction. Drycells are a lot more effeciency then helix cells because of the much larger surfuces to collect hydrogen and oxygen..
But 240 watts a litre is still way under refining oil into gasoline, look at the standard way of boiling it...
6000 watts per 1 gallon of gasoline.. yet we use that without thought.. thats 1500 watts a litre :-\
funny I've seen cars and trucks with 1000 watt amplifiers and 100 watt speakers
@DerStiffler94 U r right. U need a massive amount of energy to splits the Hydrogen and oxygen. The alternator cannot produce enough electricity. It like you trying to have over 100% of efficiency. Not possible.
This guy was found to be a fraud in court and died in the late 90's .... who knows if it ever worked. If it did.... it would violate the laws thermodynamics, which Einstein created.
@frasercorey yeah the court called it a fraud and shut him up. They do exist but oil arab countries and cities like Dubai aren't done taking the worlds wealth
ALLIEN TECHNOLOGY, YOU DESCRIBE AS FUTURE TECHNOLOGY! Maybe, i am a Allien! The most Time i thing, what the ..... Humans doing for Shi...! I INVENT A SOLARPANELLIGHT, IT NOT ONLY GENERATE ENERGY! IT ALSO GIVE YOU LIGHT (STREETLIGHTS ETC.). IT ALSO GROW UP FOOT ON LAND 2-3 TIMES MORE! IT ALSO SWIM (WATERPROOF)AND GROW UP AQUACULTURE (SEAFOOT & MORE),AND THE BEST THINK IS,IT NEEDS 80%-90% LESS MATERIAL AND COSTS LIKE REGULAR STUFF, AND WORKS IN AREAS WERE SOLAR TECHNOLOGY IS UNKNOWN, ONLY FROM TV
2nd free energie like nikola tesla describes reality? would the wardenclyffe-tower work? j.p.morgan first financed it because tesla said sth. like 'im building a radio for you.. ' then turned out that tesla actually wanted to build machines to make free wiredless energie for every person on planet. then j.p.m says 'but how can we put a counter on free energie-machines?!? imbossible! ...old system is more profitable...'
1st if this story is true, where is the knowledge of building an engine that runs with water?! very strange imo. why dont they produce 'water-cars' ? you can win more money with limited resources, like oil etc., maybe?! who knows...
@Commandok1l dang that was fast well....if you truly believe that gods still here ..or sumthin like that.....dont worry i know wut ur sayin. i know that feelin like the back of my hand but we dont get eh choice right ?
What a bull-shift! Water fuel cells don't use only water, they need some kind of energy-rich fuel such as sodium borohydride, which is much more expensive than gasoline though it can be recycled. Stop deluding people with those tabloid "news"!
HAHA DONT U ALL GET IT>>> U ARE ALL SHEEPS AND $ Controlls u thats ur FOOD DUMB ANIMAL. IF WE DONT ALL RISE AND PROTEST>>> OH wait i might get killed tommorow i should keep my mouth shot =)))
So, approximately .001% of people actually die from brain anurisms per year and you're telling me that the one man in the entire world who invented the water run car just so happened to all of a sudden have a brain anurism???? Yeah, right.
stranger things have happened. even in this clip they say that he was working with the military to produce a hammer that runs on water. i doubt they would hire him to develop weapons for them and then kill him before he could get it done.
he also didnt invent anything new. he was just using well proven techniques of scamming people out of their money by using pseudoscience.
The correct definition of the First Law of Thermodynamics is: "If energy is applied to a system to bring it into an other condition, the same amount of energy must be removed from it, to restore the original condition.
With this definition one can understand that if the system is water from start, when it becomes the original water again at the end of whatever process, no net energy could be taken out in that process - it would then have come out of nothing.
Is it just me, or does it seem as if every time an alternative fuel is found the creator mysteriously disappears?... fraud or not BP must have some awesome hit-men
alot of work when simple is best. try this - push water thru a 22lb fuel injector under 140lb from a racing fuel rail. run the compressor off the drive shaft. point the injector into a plasma arc from a simple plasma cutter. adjust the angle to just to the side of arc. poof - fire from water. go play with that in a normal 4 cyl car motor. it works. but i realized, MAKING WATER A FUEL IS BAD BAD BAD. the planet is running lower on drinkable water everyday. wars will start over water 1 day
soo. how bout that no maintence he was talking about....unless you use exotic materials the most cost effective electrolosis cell runs with stainless steel plates. the chemical reaction to stainless steel plates with electrolosis produces hexavalant chromium, a toxic byproduct. you will need to extract that from the cell and dispose of it at a hazardous waste place. also you will need to fill your water up and so on. there is never a no maintnece engine. it will be like changing your own oil.
Once again we are asked to believe that water will replace in large measure conventional sources of energy. If this idea had any validity, there are many venture capitalists with no love of the oil industry that would be happy to bankroll research and developement in this area. So far...none have. Legitimate developers would never show their product on YouTube before it was ready for production.
@ZeekWolfe1 We are not asked to believe anything, it is up to the listener to decide.. Dunebuggy dude didnt put this on youtube.. his death occured shortly after this airing in the mid to late 80s... Anything is possible with imagination... this is possible
Salut , as vrea si eu sa-mi montez pe masina o instalatie HHO , dar nu stiu unde sa caut pentru ca in Romania sant multi care zic ca au inventat : e unul la Arad , unul la Bacau , altul la Bucuresti . Oare toti au inventat sau se dau in spectacol. Unde sa caut pe internet ceva exact despre motorul cu apa pentru ca am nevoie urgent de masina neputand cumpara motorina la pretul mare de la pompa .Te rog daca poti sa ma ajuti trimite-mi mesaj.
im thick so can someone please tell me if this can actually be done? ..
ive heard storys over the years of people inventing water engines and being paid off by oil companys (or got rid of) and that oil companys have the patent for these engines ....
id like to know because my diesel bill is going up and up and im pissed off
This invention if honestly falls in honest people's hands would mean no more paying for energy ever! That means good-bye to power lines, fuel stations, pollution from fossil fuel, and those people who make billions $ from carbon based fuels. Carbon belongs under the ground where it's always been for millions of years, not in the atmosphere. Mention his name, in chat rooms, in forums, in public speaking, and ask yourselves what good you are to this planet if you don't contribute to a gl
@yb1000 the government was interested, meaning the wanted to sqaush it so people will continue PAYING for oil... you honestly think they'd put a billion dollar business out of business?
Truth is he should have done it behind theyre back, and we would have been running on it today.
@eyewarnedyou I see the symptoms. you misdiagnose the cause. It is the greed and corruption cheaters. See capitalism, a love story, by Micheal Moore. I am a moderate. Thieves changed the rules and called it wise when it was larcenous. It's the oldest story in the world. I wouldn't want to go socialist, but if the rules can't police the system this is what you get. Since the death of global socialism, capitalist have had a free reign to buy the news papers for propaganda and kill regulation.
This was made in the '80's. God. And , I love this guy. He just thought it up, and did it. That's American know how!! The Fuckers kept it down. That's Reaganomics for ya!! Keep telling me hoe The American conservative "Republican" Movement does anything for anyone but for itself. And a thug is a thug, white collar or blue collar. How many crimes against the life of the country shall they be allowed to perpetrate before we don't get fooled again? Don't Blame Obama for the mess we are in.
@kaiser85collins i seen it in 1970 and someone you know jack nic something in the 80 its time to shoot some oil men dont you think all the money gone to some hick to keep you go to the gas pump
the oil companys rin everything in the early 1900 some guy invented a carberated engine that got 100 mpg as well right before the modle T car it was battling with electric cars that were better than the modle t and just advanced as todays hybrid cars but the modle t became more popular becease it had more power and was faster then the oil companys bought off the electric cars and destroyed them as well as the carburated egine earlyer. so fuck the oil companys.
@walter0bz - Uh, doesn’t public transport run on petrol? I guess you should fuck the people that made that too. Also, without petrol transport you wouldn’t have food and other goods (including bicycles) transported to your area. It’s also a little impractical visiting grandma two states over by bike. I tried riding public transport to work once but I took 4 times as long and I had to sit next to some smelly weirdo that apparently hates the people that invented cars and bathing...
@walter0bz - People have been moving away from grandma for 100,000 years before petroleum. We live in a world that inquisitive minds, beasts of burden, the wheel, ships, and a bit of imperialism created. Heck, George Stephenson took people to see grandma for 100 years before Diesel. Also, we could easily sustain the same sanitation levels using hydro, wind, geo, bio, solar, coal, natural gas, nuclear etc...
@thelsel348 nuclear maybe - till the uranium runs out.
the other sources - not a hope in hell . modern progress is entirely down to having a glut of fossil fuel energy to burn out. The biosphere we evolved from is already comprised of superior renewable 'technology'
There is a simple guide called HHO Booster that I have used, and you can use to convert your car to get up to 60 MPG, and safely improve your cars performance by more than 65% for 10x cheaper than a hybrid vehicle from any brand of auto maker literally.
Buying HHO Booster is one Of the best decisions I have ever made. Checkout my video and unbiased review of the HHO Booster Guide on my channel in the description of video.
That was an assumption on my part as you mentioned the reaction of H2 with N2 in your original post. I can appreciate, for simplicity sake, the use of assumed base 1 scientific units. You could find out how much work a electrolysis reaction needs to produces a mol of H2 gas from water... then you would be on your way to figuring out the actual efficiency of this process.
@Ragnarokgn I saw it as a child, a teacher sap water and it went bang! didn't think of it till now. And then there is the old sailor stories of ghosts that appear as "blue fire" after a thunder storm, Jap cartoons still depict ghosts with blue flames around... Scientifically I would say lightning carried in the salty water, released hydrogen, witch then ignite in the presence of oxygen. All energy is eventually lost in "heat" but in this case it can be used.
I have a question..... What's more practical, a car that uses electricity to turn H2O into HHO and uses HHO to power the motor, or is the amount of electricity used to create the HHO not worth it compared to just using the electricity alone to power the engine?
@GunnySkox boyce is saying what i beleive meyers was trying or doing that a lower amount of energy can be used to break the bonds, and cause he effect by using different frequencys on the energy ie using three different cycles if i understand it right, but i am looking for more info
Alrighty, folks, this is getting out of hand. Stan Meyer's engine would violate the first and second laws of thermodynamics. Think about it; an engine that takes water, breaks its bonds (requiring energy), and then reforms those bonds while releasing even more energy. TWO YEARS before his death, an Ohio court found him guilty of "gross and egregious fraud" after he conned investers out of money. By the way, an autopsy after his death found that he died of a cerebral aneurysm. Anything else?
@Zink575 it doesn't violate any laws ya tard, its called electrolysis. You need electricity (via a battery) to start the process but once the engine gets going and can recharge that battery and become a self sustaining process, as long as there is water to convert of course. This is a video from the 90s or something because the Japanese have perfected it already LOL! Take your conspiracy death shit elsewhere... this isn't that complex.
@aaron2414 Excuse me? It definitely does violate at least the first two thermodynamic laws. I am exceedingly well aquainted with the process of electrolysis. However, you seem to be forgetting that it requires a power source to perform electrolysis. The energy required to perfom electrolysis always exceeds the energy produced from the products. That's simple chemistry. Please explain why you think this would work.
@Zink575 LOL! Well I already did tell you where your "external power source" is. Its most likely not just simple battery but that will work too. Honestly, just google "BATTERY ELECTROLYSIS and you will get tons of blueprints (images tab)...and second, you quoted 2 laws that have nothing to do with this system, well the 1st might because its how energy is transfered as heat, but the 2nd law has to do with entropy. This isn't a closed system, it has an input VIA electrolysis. This isnt that hard
@aaron2414 No, the first two thermodynamic laws are being violated. The first law states that energy cannot be created or destroyed. In the system you and this video suggest, you start with water and an input of energy. At the end of the process, you end with water and an output of even more energy. Hence, energy was created. The second law deals with maximum efficiencies of heat engines. No engine can convert all chemical energy in reactants to work as energy is inevitably lost as heat.
@Zink575 I would agree with you about the creation of energy, but you are forgetting about the energy put into the system to start the conversion, it's not the water. Whether it be a battery or electric generator there is an input of energy via electricity. And I also agree that water is a final product but not a complete conversion was made. MOST of the energy released from breaking the bonds was released as heat and only a small portion is back into water, not created, transferred.
@aaron2414 That's the point of my argument. An input of energy is required to split the water. That energy exceeds the energy produced. Therefore, what's the point? It'd be more efficient to use whatever the energy input is as fuel. All hydrogen used returns to water. You yourself acknowledged that energy is being created from nothing, rendering this "water powered engine" a fallacy. Goodnight
@Zink575 LOL! You have completely missed the point and keep inserting your own words into my statements. Energy is not being created its being transferred. EVERY car needs and input of energy to start. Thats why you have a battery in your car right now. NO it does not exceed the amount produced, have you ever messed with hydrogen or oxygen gas? CRAZY explosive and works the same as a gas combustion chamber. All you need is an alternator to continually supply the electricity for conversion!
@aaron2414 You need to learn some basic physics. You cannot convert volts to joules because they are not the same thing. To get joules you would need to know current and duration, but this should have been obvious when you got a 3x10^24 roi.
@Ragnarokgn What the hell are you talking about, "can't convert volts to joules"? You literally just wrote the basic formula (kinda) on how to do that... only working backwards.
Energy = volts * charge (measured in columbs) so...
Joules = volts * columbs (i dont remember the charge of the atoms, it's been over a month now since I pulled the info)
@aaron2414 Volts are Joules per Ampere-Second, so without current and time it is nonsense to turn volts into joules. Sure, volts can be written joules per coulomb, but that is the same units as joules per ampere-second as ampere-second is coulomb.
Additionally, you cannot know how much energy is released from a reaction without stating quantity of reactants. Why you are even mentioning hydrazine is beyond me. Water in to Water out, what is the energy result?
@Ragnarokgn the amount I was messing with was 1 mole of each. Got the atomic/molar numbers from my buddy (actually a chemistry major) because i am not a chemist :-p ...and the second part, I don't remember typing hydrazine at at all. I even had to google that, N2H4?
@Ragnarokgn ...honestly I really do apologize for stopping this "debate" now, but I stand by my math and conversions. I am not so passionate about this subject after all the damn math on paper that has to be done to explain or prove a point. Feel free to take on someone else, but I just don't want to calculate stuff anymore LOL! I need to focus on my computer programming skills/logic for college this summer :-(
@aaron2414 I completely understand. I hope you do well in college.
I am really not interested in "arguing" this either. Belief in over-unity is essentially religious, so I doubt much progress will be made in changing opinions. I guess my goal in this useless endeavor is to plant the seeds of doubt. Possibly with that doubt growing into the rejection of magical thinking by the more logical "believers".
I have no worry about how you currently believe as long as you remain honest to yourself.
@beyondhelp00 And of course when we don't know enough about a subject to make an educated judgement, we rely on one thing "gut" I mean if you said that this is amazing someone might ask you why you believe that? but if you just say what most people say then nobody will really ask you anything, put brain on neutral and just ride along with the crowd...
And what if it was true? well it would be recognized by those who rule society, the ones who just can't stomach to ride along with the crowd.
@Ramiromasters Part of the quest for development is to accept certain laws of physics in order to stop wasting time on principles that are fundamentally impossible. This is not the same as exploring areas still unknown in physics.. (this video experiment is entirely known) Having the ability to do this prevents wasting time on projects like this which can and never will work and instead develop ideas and technology that may lead to new discoveries.
Check out a Japanese company named "Genepax" their car running is not my opinion... why did the US makes hummers that run on water or gas? are they nuts?
But I don't blame you, there are millions of dollars in propaganda to make you think just like that. Rudolf Diesel invented an engine to run on peanut oil, but got killed, his patents later bought from family and later t engine was used to burn the petrol derivate "Diesel" sad we never saw its true potential, till obsolesce...
@aaron2414 bingo electrolysis, 1.47 volts at 5 amps produces enough hydrogen and oxygen to run a 1000cc voltswagon internal combustion engine. welcome to the water fuel age :-)
@aaron2414 joules ≠ volts, so you can make no comparison between the splitting voltage (which in a physical sense is a measure of force) and the energy of combustion without knowing the time over which the voltage was applied (IE, amperage, or current draw rate). Energy (joules)=Volts*Amps*Time(seconds)
And as a follow up; yes, car engines can be and have been designed to run very well on hydrogen. That does not mean that splitting water with electricity and then recombining it somehow creates energy. The laws of physics still apply. The US government has developed flex fuel vehicles because they want military applications that can operate in any environment. Say I have a large apu battery and water..... now I can drive my hummer another 10 miles to get out of a danger.
@geheirnwaeshen well that statement doesn't really make sense since you pieced together other bits of information (out of context i might add) and called it a "false equation"...
I also see (on your profile) that you have been trolling other engine videos and you must feel very important. You deserve no response.
@aaron2414 um.... wow. I gave you the correct equation, and as an engineer I feel that I should educate people who might otherwise think you could possibly be right.... and all you can come back with is an insult? Please grow up.
@geheirnwaeshen and you better my "lame" response, you pretty much just told the world that combustion is the REVERSAL of electrolysis... Feel l like educating on the possibility of that? All you really did was simplify my explanation of how the combustion (release of energy) of the Hydrogen and Oxygen gives you a great deal of energy. Just because you need a small amount to split the initial bonds does NOT mean you will get the same back. The O2 is less stable on its own
@aaron2414 Because burning H2 is chemically the same as electrolysis, and yes, burning hydrogen produces water. If you don't believe me, get a DC power source, a 2 liter bottle, some epoxy, 2 carbon electrodes and a balloon. You can make your own browns gas and then burn it to produce water again. I think you need to pick up an introductory to chemistry book.
@aaron2414 You are using incomparable measurements. The "E = +1.229 V" is the reduction potential required to electrolyze water.
In the second equation, you converted energy of combustion to "electron volts" which is not remotely comparable to volts. Volts are a measurement of potential. Electron volts are a unit of energy.
The ENERGY required - at minimum in a perfect world - for the electrolysis is 572 kJ/mol - the same as that recovered from burning it. In practice, it is much higher.
@Zink575 First law - "The internal energy of an isolated system is constant." (this is NOT an isolated system since there is an external input of energy to start..electricity, or some other catalyst
Second law = "Heat cannot spontaneously flow from a colder location to a hotter location." (law of entropy, again only has to do with closed systems, which this is not) Keep adding water and electricity and the cycle will continue. That's why your gas car has an alternator, keeps the cycle going.
so let me get this straight...this is from awhile ago, right? yet here we are, its 2011 and were still using oil and gasoline as a fuel source? didnt it say in the video" this could be being sold in the next few years"? what is wrong with us!?! we have the technology to make mass amounts of these, and yet were ignoring it as if it were something that isnt as important as getting a toy out of a cereal box : /
@me5cool2872 The military met with him after this story broke loose years ago, had dinner with him, poisoned his food, and sadly MR. Meyer died in the parking lot of that restaurant.
@mrwascaly42 There are many cases of where people develop alternative energy that could replace petrolium once and for all, but all of the creators all some how, end up dying before they can patent their idea.
@mrwascaly42 Do you believe absolutely everything you hear or just most things? There is an official Ohio autopsy available for Mr. Meyer, if you're interested in what actually happened, but that's a big "if," isn't it?
@Zink575 I could really care less about your typical antagonistic approach to me. I know what I know and far more than you could ever comprehend. I believe the official report on the death of Stan Meyer about as much as I believe the single bullshit theory put out by the Warren Commission about the Kennedy assassination.
@GunnySkox yes I know , nevermind I'm calculating how much hho this 3.5 horse engine (0.148 litre) takes to run @ 500 rpm 40 cfm carb, anyways, so were on the level with cars and hho, now I have everyreason to believe stan meyer little buggy was light as a feather and has a tiny engine.. so we need more power .. k, found one here 48 volt @ 150 amps, for houseboatds, 30 foot yachts etc. 7200 watt hour output. :-\
@GunnySkox ya I know the current, voltage blahblah from led wiring (changing the 60watt bulbs to 3volt (@500miliamp) led's for major energy savings lol Anyway 28600?, ya, thats a lot of watts, why does my drycell put out 1.5 litres a minute at 3 volt @ 5 amps?hmm, a better questions is how many litre's of hho are in one mole of hho. doh I'I thinking you dont need 55 moles an hour to run a voltwagons... those engine's are tiny.
@GunnySkox because ppl see the video of it running and pass it off as "bullshit" and "fraud" before they understand how iit can work, you know the one's that say "its impossible" even if they see it with there own eyes :-\ and perhaps they might seriously reconsider trying it when they cant afford gasoline. Till then I guess they will just keep paying for gasoline no matter what ppl tell them, truth or not. doesn't matter to me I already know its possible.
@GunnySkox haha your as closed minded as I was before I realized there's no way it cant work... doesn't matter what its made of huh.. ya, I guess no matter what we learn or cant learn its imposible no matter what so we might as well pay for gasoline until there's none left and have no alternatives. Lemme ask you an honest question, do you think the world is flat, or do you believe the man who proved it wasn't.
@GunnySkox fuel cell? uh, you didn't read the comparison.... lol I know fuel cells are very inefficient, thats why that NASA page said COMBUSTION ENGINES.. the comparision they gave was the difference in mileage, hydrogen vs gasoline... 3x LESS hydrogen to achieve same mileage as gasoline... the heat output of hydrogen is LESS then gasoline.. so, if gasoline works.,.. please tell me one "law" that breads. :-\ , as for the electrictity... permanent magnet alternator.
@GunnySkox hmm funny all these laws have nothing to to with the simple combustion engine.. In fact we already know they ruin on almost anything combustable, like propane, natural gas, etc. ignore all the laws and look at whichever fuel is the most effecient at exploding... and well, 2 parts hydrogen/1 part oxygen burns 100x faster then gasoline.. no reason why it shouldnt work....
@GunnySkox NASA working on hydrogen tank to fuel standard combustion engines. No matter what law you go by, Hydrogen is atomic... you cant use the same laws..
heres the page at NASA erc.ivv.nasa.gov/vision/earth/everydaylife/apr_zeolite_prt.htm
oh, nasa firgures you need 1/3rd of hydrogen compared to gasoline to attain the same mileage
So why don't you take the exhaust tube, run it through a box to condense the water vapor and pour it back into the water tank? That would be perpetual motion.
I know some person is going to say "but it uses the water so it can't be recycled"
My question is how does it "use" water??
If you react hydrogen and oxygen, the products will be water(gas) and heat and kinetic energy.
***This comment is removed by the gouvernment of the USA.***
drijfkip1 1 week ago
This wont work: You need energy to make Hydrogen out of Water. Space ships are flying with Hydrogen and oxygen and the smoke that comes out is Water(steam). Its like you are trying to make an engine running with Co2.
DerStiffler94 3 weeks ago
@DerStiffler94 its already been proven an gas guzzling internal combustion engine can run on hyfrogen. BMW did it with the Hydrogen 7 .. Mythbusters did it to an old car with a bottle of it injecting it into the carbourator with a hose....
It is quite possible.. as long as the engine is running, its alternator(s) are producing electricty.. electrolysis use's electricity and splits Hydrogen and oxygen from water..
I'd say its a pretty unique 100% recycleable system
Me102288 2 weeks ago
@Me102288 U need a massive amount of energy to splits the Hydrogen and oxygen. The alternator cannot produce enough electricity. It like you trying to have over 100% of efficiency. Not possible.
neerajmjj 2 weeks ago
@neerajmjj 2 volts per plate gap depending on its construction. Drycells are a lot more effeciency then helix cells because of the much larger surfuces to collect hydrogen and oxygen..
But 240 watts a litre is still way under refining oil into gasoline, look at the standard way of boiling it...
6000 watts per 1 gallon of gasoline.. yet we use that without thought.. thats 1500 watts a litre :-\
funny I've seen cars and trucks with 1000 watt amplifiers and 100 watt speakers
Me102288 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DerStiffler94 U r right. U need a massive amount of energy to splits the Hydrogen and oxygen. The alternator cannot produce enough electricity. It like you trying to have over 100% of efficiency. Not possible.
neerajmjj 2 weeks ago
RAPIST GALSSES
mjndblain 3 weeks ago
This guy was found to be a fraud in court and died in the late 90's .... who knows if it ever worked. If it did.... it would violate the laws thermodynamics, which Einstein created.
frasercorey 3 weeks ago
@frasercorey yeah the court called it a fraud and shut him up. They do exist but oil arab countries and cities like Dubai aren't done taking the worlds wealth
hernandadmx 3 weeks ago
ALLIEN TECHNOLOGY, YOU DESCRIBE AS FUTURE TECHNOLOGY! Maybe, i am a Allien! The most Time i thing, what the ..... Humans doing for Shi...! I INVENT A SOLARPANELLIGHT, IT NOT ONLY GENERATE ENERGY! IT ALSO GIVE YOU LIGHT (STREETLIGHTS ETC.). IT ALSO GROW UP FOOT ON LAND 2-3 TIMES MORE! IT ALSO SWIM (WATERPROOF)AND GROW UP AQUACULTURE (SEAFOOT & MORE),AND THE BEST THINK IS,IT NEEDS 80%-90% LESS MATERIAL AND COSTS LIKE REGULAR STUFF, AND WORKS IN AREAS WERE SOLAR TECHNOLOGY IS UNKNOWN, ONLY FROM TV
solarpanellights 1 month ago
2nd free energie like nikola tesla describes reality? would the wardenclyffe-tower work? j.p.morgan first financed it because tesla said sth. like 'im building a radio for you.. ' then turned out that tesla actually wanted to build machines to make free wiredless energie for every person on planet. then j.p.m says 'but how can we put a counter on free energie-machines?!? imbossible! ...old system is more profitable...'
urgirl69style 1 month ago
@urgirl69style jp morgan financed this to get it on the shadows !
they own oil.!
one of the most famous illuminati members.
chevydeo 1 month ago
1st if this story is true, where is the knowledge of building an engine that runs with water?! very strange imo. why dont they produce 'water-cars' ? you can win more money with limited resources, like oil etc., maybe?! who knows...
urgirl69style 1 month ago
@urgirl69style Oil is black. Our govn't is obsessed with DARKNESS.
mytime2shine13 3 weeks ago
Anyone ever heard of Walter Jenkins??
JonEApelcede 1 month ago
yah he was muredered we gotta do sumthin'
ThePeopleneedhelp 1 month ago
@ThePeopleneedhelp no
Commandok1l 1 month ago
@Commandok1l y not
ThePeopleneedhelp 1 month ago
@ThePeopleneedhelp nothing can be done the reptilian greys will win no matter what
Commandok1l 1 month ago
@Commandok1l dang that was fast well....if you truly believe that gods still here ..or sumthin like that.....dont worry i know wut ur sayin. i know that feelin like the back of my hand but we dont get eh choice right ?
ThePeopleneedhelp 1 month ago
Chances are this man and anyone tied to his project were assinated by the government or the illuminati.
craig12ist 1 month ago 10
Where are water engines its 2 more day till 2012 the fuckin illumati stop that project
captinchronic777 1 month ago
What a bull-shift! Water fuel cells don't use only water, they need some kind of energy-rich fuel such as sodium borohydride, which is much more expensive than gasoline though it can be recycled. Stop deluding people with those tabloid "news"!
r8wing 2 months ago
worries of 1990's: Oil embargos
worries of 2011: global warming
its funny how times change...
nata911 2 months ago
try this engine in winter
xrecorder 2 months ago
@xrecorder kakaka,lolz smart answer!
BlakeneyKennels 2 months ago
HAHA DONT U ALL GET IT>>> U ARE ALL SHEEPS AND $ Controlls u thats ur FOOD DUMB ANIMAL. IF WE DONT ALL RISE AND PROTEST>>> OH wait i might get killed tommorow i should keep my mouth shot =)))
DbozenD 3 months ago
So, approximately .001% of people actually die from brain anurisms per year and you're telling me that the one man in the entire world who invented the water run car just so happened to all of a sudden have a brain anurism???? Yeah, right.
cevansroxy 3 months ago
@cevansroxy
stranger things have happened. even in this clip they say that he was working with the military to produce a hammer that runs on water. i doubt they would hire him to develop weapons for them and then kill him before he could get it done.
he also didnt invent anything new. he was just using well proven techniques of scamming people out of their money by using pseudoscience.
Crazylalalalala 3 months ago
@cevansroxy sez ".001% of people actually die from brain anurisms per year "
100% of the people who day per year, die from something.
The cause of their death has NOTHING to do with their occupation be it Bum or Scientist.
Your implication is that he was killed.
Why would a payed killer take the risk or poison in a diner?
Do you know how much trouble it would be to get everyone to be in on the killing?
They could have faked a suicide much more easily.
Think about it.
Texmurphy51 3 months ago
Hahahaha is that dump :D this guy fooled everyone with that shit
FGSMBGermany 3 months ago
@FGSMBGermany what you talking about fooled every body hydrogen fuel cell is very real
fordham237 3 months ago
I always wanted to ask - Can it run on piss?
topgunexcel 4 months ago
@topgunexcel Maybe if you drink enough alcohol!
ohyrag 3 months ago
@ohyrag Cool, ROAD TRIP!!!!
topgunexcel 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The correct definition of the First Law of Thermodynamics is: "If energy is applied to a system to bring it into an other condition, the same amount of energy must be removed from it, to restore the original condition.
With this definition one can understand that if the system is water from start, when it becomes the original water again at the end of whatever process, no net energy could be taken out in that process - it would then have come out of nothing.
Thermospecialist 4 months ago
I bet the BIG THREE and BIG OIL had this guy killed!!!!!!
In4cus 4 months ago 47
@In4cus yes they did three days after this report
Antonio001z 4 months ago
@In4cus
They didn't kill him!
He died in a unsuspiciously plane crash one week later.. or was it a train crash? Hmm...
Smogglas 3 months ago
Comment removed
In4cus 4 months ago
Is it just me, or does it seem as if every time an alternative fuel is found the creator mysteriously disappears?... fraud or not BP must have some awesome hit-men
DrWadham 4 months ago
alot of work when simple is best. try this - push water thru a 22lb fuel injector under 140lb from a racing fuel rail. run the compressor off the drive shaft. point the injector into a plasma arc from a simple plasma cutter. adjust the angle to just to the side of arc. poof - fire from water. go play with that in a normal 4 cyl car motor. it works. but i realized, MAKING WATER A FUEL IS BAD BAD BAD. the planet is running lower on drinkable water everyday. wars will start over water 1 day
PrimeTargetSecurity 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
everyone in this film has been offed by the oil co......
jmecrg 4 months ago
mono nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnooooooooooooooooo right ear...
tylerbhobbs 5 months ago
Wasn't the inventor killed? years ago?
ztarrfect 5 months ago
@ztarrfect He committed suicide after being discovered as a fraud.
KenMacMillan 5 months ago
@KenMacMillan u r n idiot
INDIANAJOSH12 4 months ago
That looked to be more then two years old! Where the hell are these things?
kayneisable 5 months ago
Comment removed
kayneisable 5 months ago
soo. how bout that no maintence he was talking about....unless you use exotic materials the most cost effective electrolosis cell runs with stainless steel plates. the chemical reaction to stainless steel plates with electrolosis produces hexavalant chromium, a toxic byproduct. you will need to extract that from the cell and dispose of it at a hazardous waste place. also you will need to fill your water up and so on. there is never a no maintnece engine. it will be like changing your own oil.
SeanofZeus 5 months ago
so folks, how about that mass production? eh?
r00dd00d 5 months ago
Once again we are asked to believe that water will replace in large measure conventional sources of energy. If this idea had any validity, there are many venture capitalists with no love of the oil industry that would be happy to bankroll research and developement in this area. So far...none have. Legitimate developers would never show their product on YouTube before it was ready for production.
ZeekWolfe1 5 months ago
@ZeekWolfe1 I think he was poisoned by the Saudis before his idea got up and going.
sorich 5 months ago
@ZeekWolfe1 We are not asked to believe anything, it is up to the listener to decide.. Dunebuggy dude didnt put this on youtube.. his death occured shortly after this airing in the mid to late 80s... Anything is possible with imagination... this is possible
incognito88n 5 months ago
@incognito88n "Anything is possible with imagination"
It is only possible within your imagination.
You cant change the laws of physics just because you Believe in something.
Texmurphy51 5 months ago
36 people from the ZOG government saw this video!
IsraeliteMessenger 5 months ago
Salut , as vrea si eu sa-mi montez pe masina o instalatie HHO , dar nu stiu unde sa caut pentru ca in Romania sant multi care zic ca au inventat : e unul la Arad , unul la Bacau , altul la Bucuresti . Oare toti au inventat sau se dau in spectacol. Unde sa caut pe internet ceva exact despre motorul cu apa pentru ca am nevoie urgent de masina neputand cumpara motorina la pretul mare de la pompa .Te rog daca poti sa ma ajuti trimite-mi mesaj.
TheMikhael999 5 months ago
WHY IS THERE NO SOUND???
KanyeTroll 5 months ago
im thick so can someone please tell me if this can actually be done? ..
ive heard storys over the years of people inventing water engines and being paid off by oil companys (or got rid of) and that oil companys have the patent for these engines ....
id like to know because my diesel bill is going up and up and im pissed off
imawakeish 6 months ago
@imawakeish yes welcome to the famely we are all slaves enjoy $ buys u so why $ doesnt bouy any thing else ?
DbozenD 3 months ago
@DbozenD Thanks for accepting me . Im so lost
imawakeish 3 months ago
This invention if honestly falls in honest people's hands would mean no more paying for energy ever! That means good-bye to power lines, fuel stations, pollution from fossil fuel, and those people who make billions $ from carbon based fuels. Carbon belongs under the ground where it's always been for millions of years, not in the atmosphere. Mention his name, in chat rooms, in forums, in public speaking, and ask yourselves what good you are to this planet if you don't contribute to a gl
911LIESdotORG 6 months ago
what's gonna happen to the whole car industry if water-based engines become a reality one day?
i guess I am just sick of the world the way it is.
yb1000 6 months ago
@yb1000 the government was interested, meaning the wanted to sqaush it so people will continue PAYING for oil... you honestly think they'd put a billion dollar business out of business?
Truth is he should have done it behind theyre back, and we would have been running on it today.
Me102288 5 months ago
water engine = bullshit.
I have a friend runing on whiskey and water when drive.
Actually had no licences.
TheSilvanian 6 months ago
@eyewarnedyou I see the symptoms. you misdiagnose the cause. It is the greed and corruption cheaters. See capitalism, a love story, by Micheal Moore. I am a moderate. Thieves changed the rules and called it wise when it was larcenous. It's the oldest story in the world. I wouldn't want to go socialist, but if the rules can't police the system this is what you get. Since the death of global socialism, capitalist have had a free reign to buy the news papers for propaganda and kill regulation.
rgaleny 6 months ago
@eyewarnedyou I think you're a misinformed rube.
rgaleny 6 months ago
r.i.p
athletichunta 7 months ago
This was made in the '80's. God. And , I love this guy. He just thought it up, and did it. That's American know how!! The Fuckers kept it down. That's Reaganomics for ya!! Keep telling me hoe The American conservative "Republican" Movement does anything for anyone but for itself. And a thug is a thug, white collar or blue collar. How many crimes against the life of the country shall they be allowed to perpetrate before we don't get fooled again? Don't Blame Obama for the mess we are in.
rgaleny 7 months ago
Wow.what year was this?
kaiser85collins 8 months ago 12
@kaiser85collins i seen it in 1970 and someone you know jack nic something in the 80 its time to shoot some oil men dont you think all the money gone to some hick to keep you go to the gas pump
scouttroop291 4 months ago
___ w w w diymagneticmotor com has interesting PLANS~
vodafoneoff 8 months ago
the oil companys rin everything in the early 1900 some guy invented a carberated engine that got 100 mpg as well right before the modle T car it was battling with electric cars that were better than the modle t and just advanced as todays hybrid cars but the modle t became more popular becease it had more power and was faster then the oil companys bought off the electric cars and destroyed them as well as the carburated egine earlyer. so fuck the oil companys.
j351936240sx 8 months ago
@j351936240sx -
fuck the people who made the petrol car popular
fuck the people who wont switch to bicycles / public transport
people chose this world one step at a time
walter0bz 8 months ago
@walter0bz - Uh, doesn’t public transport run on petrol? I guess you should fuck the people that made that too. Also, without petrol transport you wouldn’t have food and other goods (including bicycles) transported to your area. It’s also a little impractical visiting grandma two states over by bike. I tried riding public transport to work once but I took 4 times as long and I had to sit next to some smelly weirdo that apparently hates the people that invented cars and bathing...
thelsel348 8 months ago
@thelsel348
>>"It’s also a little impractical visiting grandma two states over by bike."
why is your grandma so far away? this is the world the oil companies created - and it's coming to an end when the oil runs out - get used to it.
>>I had to sit next to some smelly weirdo that apparently hates the people that invented cars and bathing...
-get used to that too, because without fossil fuels we wont have sanitation to the same level.
walter0bz 8 months ago
@walter0bz - People have been moving away from grandma for 100,000 years before petroleum. We live in a world that inquisitive minds, beasts of burden, the wheel, ships, and a bit of imperialism created. Heck, George Stephenson took people to see grandma for 100 years before Diesel. Also, we could easily sustain the same sanitation levels using hydro, wind, geo, bio, solar, coal, natural gas, nuclear etc...
thelsel348 8 months ago
@thelsel348 nuclear maybe - till the uranium runs out.
the other sources - not a hope in hell . modern progress is entirely down to having a glut of fossil fuel energy to burn out. The biosphere we evolved from is already comprised of superior renewable 'technology'
walter0bz 8 months ago
imagine aircraft running on this engine..wow, well except for the poor guy who has to ride on the engine to keep it going.
nshamblin 8 months ago
this guy mysteriously died days before he was set to mass produce this vehicle
bordone 8 months ago
i am willing to buy your system
TheDotcomet 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is a simple guide called HHO Booster that I have used, and you can use to convert your car to get up to 60 MPG, and safely improve your cars performance by more than 65% for 10x cheaper than a hybrid vehicle from any brand of auto maker literally.
Buying HHO Booster is one Of the best decisions I have ever made. Checkout my video and unbiased review of the HHO Booster Guide on my channel in the description of video.
HelpingMakeLifeEZ 9 months ago
where the fuck did this idea go in the modern world
67ford1 9 months ago
That was an assumption on my part as you mentioned the reaction of H2 with N2 in your original post. I can appreciate, for simplicity sake, the use of assumed base 1 scientific units. You could find out how much work a electrolysis reaction needs to produces a mol of H2 gas from water... then you would be on your way to figuring out the actual efficiency of this process.
Ragnarokgn 9 months ago
@Ragnarokgn I saw it as a child, a teacher sap water and it went bang! didn't think of it till now. And then there is the old sailor stories of ghosts that appear as "blue fire" after a thunder storm, Jap cartoons still depict ghosts with blue flames around... Scientifically I would say lightning carried in the salty water, released hydrogen, witch then ignite in the presence of oxygen. All energy is eventually lost in "heat" but in this case it can be used.
Ramiromasters 8 months ago
This makes electric car trash
1ethiopialove 9 months ago
I have a question..... What's more practical, a car that uses electricity to turn H2O into HHO and uses HHO to power the motor, or is the amount of electricity used to create the HHO not worth it compared to just using the electricity alone to power the engine?
FUNNYCOWY 10 months ago
@The Toracat
Of course it takes no energy to grow that tree. After all, the sun uses absolutely no energy to make light right????(sarcasm intended)
ntwede 10 months ago
@GunnySkox boyce is saying what i beleive meyers was trying or doing that a lower amount of energy can be used to break the bonds, and cause he effect by using different frequencys on the energy ie using three different cycles if i understand it right, but i am looking for more info
TheToracat 10 months ago
uploaded in 07 4 years later. ZIPPP
why760nitro 10 months ago
Alrighty, folks, this is getting out of hand. Stan Meyer's engine would violate the first and second laws of thermodynamics. Think about it; an engine that takes water, breaks its bonds (requiring energy), and then reforms those bonds while releasing even more energy. TWO YEARS before his death, an Ohio court found him guilty of "gross and egregious fraud" after he conned investers out of money. By the way, an autopsy after his death found that he died of a cerebral aneurysm. Anything else?
Zink575 10 months ago
@Zink575 it doesn't violate any laws ya tard, its called electrolysis. You need electricity (via a battery) to start the process but once the engine gets going and can recharge that battery and become a self sustaining process, as long as there is water to convert of course. This is a video from the 90s or something because the Japanese have perfected it already LOL! Take your conspiracy death shit elsewhere... this isn't that complex.
aaron2414 10 months ago
@aaron2414 Excuse me? It definitely does violate at least the first two thermodynamic laws. I am exceedingly well aquainted with the process of electrolysis. However, you seem to be forgetting that it requires a power source to perform electrolysis. The energy required to perfom electrolysis always exceeds the energy produced from the products. That's simple chemistry. Please explain why you think this would work.
Zink575 10 months ago
@Zink575 LOL! Well I already did tell you where your "external power source" is. Its most likely not just simple battery but that will work too. Honestly, just google "BATTERY ELECTROLYSIS and you will get tons of blueprints (images tab)...and second, you quoted 2 laws that have nothing to do with this system, well the 1st might because its how energy is transfered as heat, but the 2nd law has to do with entropy. This isn't a closed system, it has an input VIA electrolysis. This isnt that hard
aaron2414 10 months ago
@aaron2414 No, the first two thermodynamic laws are being violated. The first law states that energy cannot be created or destroyed. In the system you and this video suggest, you start with water and an input of energy. At the end of the process, you end with water and an output of even more energy. Hence, energy was created. The second law deals with maximum efficiencies of heat engines. No engine can convert all chemical energy in reactants to work as energy is inevitably lost as heat.
Zink575 10 months ago
@Zink575 I would agree with you about the creation of energy, but you are forgetting about the energy put into the system to start the conversion, it's not the water. Whether it be a battery or electric generator there is an input of energy via electricity. And I also agree that water is a final product but not a complete conversion was made. MOST of the energy released from breaking the bonds was released as heat and only a small portion is back into water, not created, transferred.
aaron2414 10 months ago
@aaron2414 That's the point of my argument. An input of energy is required to split the water. That energy exceeds the energy produced. Therefore, what's the point? It'd be more efficient to use whatever the energy input is as fuel. All hydrogen used returns to water. You yourself acknowledged that energy is being created from nothing, rendering this "water powered engine" a fallacy. Goodnight
Zink575 10 months ago
@Zink575 LOL! You have completely missed the point and keep inserting your own words into my statements. Energy is not being created its being transferred. EVERY car needs and input of energy to start. Thats why you have a battery in your car right now. NO it does not exceed the amount produced, have you ever messed with hydrogen or oxygen gas? CRAZY explosive and works the same as a gas combustion chamber. All you need is an alternator to continually supply the electricity for conversion!
aaron2414 10 months ago
@Zink575 Sorry this took a bit, I had to do some MATH!
2 H2O(L) → 2 H2(g) + O2(g) requires an input of E = +1.229 V
Burning H2 and N2 (via combustion) releases 572kj of energy or 3.57014164e+24 volts.
So we have input 1.229v and combusted the gasses receiving 3.57014164e+24v and a few mols of H2O
Plenty left to spin an alternator and continue the process...
aaron2414 10 months ago 19
@aaron2414 You need to learn some basic physics. You cannot convert volts to joules because they are not the same thing. To get joules you would need to know current and duration, but this should have been obvious when you got a 3x10^24 roi.
Voltage x Current = Power
Power x Time = Energy = Joules
Ragnarokgn 9 months ago
@Ragnarokgn What the hell are you talking about, "can't convert volts to joules"? You literally just wrote the basic formula (kinda) on how to do that... only working backwards.
Energy = volts * charge (measured in columbs) so...
Joules = volts * columbs (i dont remember the charge of the atoms, it's been over a month now since I pulled the info)
....power * time?
aaron2414 9 months ago
@aaron2414 Volts are Joules per Ampere-Second, so without current and time it is nonsense to turn volts into joules. Sure, volts can be written joules per coulomb, but that is the same units as joules per ampere-second as ampere-second is coulomb.
Additionally, you cannot know how much energy is released from a reaction without stating quantity of reactants. Why you are even mentioning hydrazine is beyond me. Water in to Water out, what is the energy result?
Ragnarokgn 9 months ago
@Ragnarokgn the amount I was messing with was 1 mole of each. Got the atomic/molar numbers from my buddy (actually a chemistry major) because i am not a chemist :-p ...and the second part, I don't remember typing hydrazine at at all. I even had to google that, N2H4?
aaron2414 9 months ago
@Ragnarokgn ...honestly I really do apologize for stopping this "debate" now, but I stand by my math and conversions. I am not so passionate about this subject after all the damn math on paper that has to be done to explain or prove a point. Feel free to take on someone else, but I just don't want to calculate stuff anymore LOL! I need to focus on my computer programming skills/logic for college this summer :-(
aaron2414 9 months ago
@aaron2414 I completely understand. I hope you do well in college.
I am really not interested in "arguing" this either. Belief in over-unity is essentially religious, so I doubt much progress will be made in changing opinions. I guess my goal in this useless endeavor is to plant the seeds of doubt. Possibly with that doubt growing into the rejection of magical thinking by the more logical "believers".
I have no worry about how you currently believe as long as you remain honest to yourself.
Ragnarokgn 9 months ago
@aaron2414 Nonsense.
beyondhelp00 8 months ago
@beyondhelp00 And of course when we don't know enough about a subject to make an educated judgement, we rely on one thing "gut" I mean if you said that this is amazing someone might ask you why you believe that? but if you just say what most people say then nobody will really ask you anything, put brain on neutral and just ride along with the crowd...
And what if it was true? well it would be recognized by those who rule society, the ones who just can't stomach to ride along with the crowd.
Ramiromasters 8 months ago
@Ramiromasters Part of the quest for development is to accept certain laws of physics in order to stop wasting time on principles that are fundamentally impossible. This is not the same as exploring areas still unknown in physics.. (this video experiment is entirely known) Having the ability to do this prevents wasting time on projects like this which can and never will work and instead develop ideas and technology that may lead to new discoveries.
beyondhelp00 8 months ago
@beyondhelp00
Check out a Japanese company named "Genepax" their car running is not my opinion... why did the US makes hummers that run on water or gas? are they nuts?
But I don't blame you, there are millions of dollars in propaganda to make you think just like that. Rudolf Diesel invented an engine to run on peanut oil, but got killed, his patents later bought from family and later t engine was used to burn the petrol derivate "Diesel" sad we never saw its true potential, till obsolesce...
Ramiromasters 8 months ago
@aaron2414 bingo electrolysis, 1.47 volts at 5 amps produces enough hydrogen and oxygen to run a 1000cc voltswagon internal combustion engine. welcome to the water fuel age :-)
Me102288 8 months ago
@aaron2414 joules ≠ volts, so you can make no comparison between the splitting voltage (which in a physical sense is a measure of force) and the energy of combustion without knowing the time over which the voltage was applied (IE, amperage, or current draw rate). Energy (joules)=Volts*Amps*Time(seconds)
electrolysis: 2 H2O + E1 → 2 H2 + O2
combustion: 2 H2 + O2 → 2 H2O + E2
Simple algebra tells us E1 = E2.
geheirnwaeshen 8 months ago
And as a follow up; yes, car engines can be and have been designed to run very well on hydrogen. That does not mean that splitting water with electricity and then recombining it somehow creates energy. The laws of physics still apply. The US government has developed flex fuel vehicles because they want military applications that can operate in any environment. Say I have a large apu battery and water..... now I can drive my hummer another 10 miles to get out of a danger.
geheirnwaeshen 8 months ago
@geheirnwaeshen well that statement doesn't really make sense since you pieced together other bits of information (out of context i might add) and called it a "false equation"...
I also see (on your profile) that you have been trolling other engine videos and you must feel very important. You deserve no response.
aaron2414 8 months ago
@aaron2414 um.... wow. I gave you the correct equation, and as an engineer I feel that I should educate people who might otherwise think you could possibly be right.... and all you can come back with is an insult? Please grow up.
geheirnwaeshen 8 months ago
@geheirnwaeshen Lol, well thanks for the attention. Keep postin!
aaron2414 8 months ago
@geheirnwaeshen and you better my "lame" response, you pretty much just told the world that combustion is the REVERSAL of electrolysis... Feel l like educating on the possibility of that? All you really did was simplify my explanation of how the combustion (release of energy) of the Hydrogen and Oxygen gives you a great deal of energy. Just because you need a small amount to split the initial bonds does NOT mean you will get the same back. The O2 is less stable on its own
aaron2414 8 months ago
@aaron2414 Because burning H2 is chemically the same as electrolysis, and yes, burning hydrogen produces water. If you don't believe me, get a DC power source, a 2 liter bottle, some epoxy, 2 carbon electrodes and a balloon. You can make your own browns gas and then burn it to produce water again. I think you need to pick up an introductory to chemistry book.
geheirnwaeshen 8 months ago
@geheirnwaeshen FAUCK... i typed "you better my lame...." ...I meant to type, "TO better my..." sorry for so many response posts too :-p
aaron2414 8 months ago
@aaron2414 You are using incomparable measurements. The "E = +1.229 V" is the reduction potential required to electrolyze water.
In the second equation, you converted energy of combustion to "electron volts" which is not remotely comparable to volts. Volts are a measurement of potential. Electron volts are a unit of energy.
The ENERGY required - at minimum in a perfect world - for the electrolysis is 572 kJ/mol - the same as that recovered from burning it. In practice, it is much higher.
somedudeinva 6 months ago
@aaron2414
Are you shure that H2 and N2 will burn? I'm shure it doesn't.
mikeb1444 6 months ago
@mikeb1444 hydrogen burns... remember the Hindenburg? shure = sure :-p
aaron2414 6 months ago
oops...only responded to one part, yea the N2 was a typo. N2 isnt even in water I meant O2 (oxygen)
aaron2414 6 months ago
@aaron2414
H2 & N2 is part of the Haber process to make ammonia.
mikeb1444 6 months ago
@mikeb1444 the N2 is a typo... I meant O2 (oxygen) I was typing too fast :-p
aaron2414 6 months ago
@aaron2414
We need to cool the engine, spin up all of the parts and run a lossy alternator. We aren't out of the woods yet.
mikeb1444 6 months ago
@aaron2414 yes, and you have amoniac acid in the air, and the acid rain is not a problem for you, don't you?
bucho284 6 months ago
@aaron2414 2 H2O(L) → 2 H2(g) + O2(g) requires an input of E = +1.229 V
Burning H2 and N2 (via combustion) releases 572kj of energy or 3.57014164e+24 volts
Where did you come up with this?
Texmurphy51 5 months ago
@Zink575 They an just use an alternator DUMBASSS or two or 3 of them RETARD...
TechtodaProductions 9 months ago
@Zink575 First law - "The internal energy of an isolated system is constant." (this is NOT an isolated system since there is an external input of energy to start..electricity, or some other catalyst
Second law = "Heat cannot spontaneously flow from a colder location to a hotter location." (law of entropy, again only has to do with closed systems, which this is not) Keep adding water and electricity and the cycle will continue. That's why your gas car has an alternator, keeps the cycle going.
aaron2414 10 months ago
This video was made in the late 70's
chemozi45 10 months ago
so let me get this straight...this is from awhile ago, right? yet here we are, its 2011 and were still using oil and gasoline as a fuel source? didnt it say in the video" this could be being sold in the next few years"? what is wrong with us!?! we have the technology to make mass amounts of these, and yet were ignoring it as if it were something that isnt as important as getting a toy out of a cereal box : /
me5cool2872 10 months ago
@me5cool2872 The military met with him after this story broke loose years ago, had dinner with him, poisoned his food, and sadly MR. Meyer died in the parking lot of that restaurant.
mrwascaly42 10 months ago
@mrwascaly42 There are many cases of where people develop alternative energy that could replace petrolium once and for all, but all of the creators all some how, end up dying before they can patent their idea.
Sound suspicious?
I think so
thisismyname1920 10 months ago
@mrwascaly42 Do you believe absolutely everything you hear or just most things? There is an official Ohio autopsy available for Mr. Meyer, if you're interested in what actually happened, but that's a big "if," isn't it?
Zink575 10 months ago
@Zink575 I could really care less about your typical antagonistic approach to me. I know what I know and far more than you could ever comprehend. I believe the official report on the death of Stan Meyer about as much as I believe the single bullshit theory put out by the Warren Commission about the Kennedy assassination.
mrwascaly42 10 months ago
@mrwascaly42 You're right, totally ignore facts. Good call.
Zink575 10 months ago
@GunnySkox yes I know , nevermind I'm calculating how much hho this 3.5 horse engine (0.148 litre) takes to run @ 500 rpm 40 cfm carb, anyways, so were on the level with cars and hho, now I have everyreason to believe stan meyer little buggy was light as a feather and has a tiny engine.. so we need more power .. k, found one here 48 volt @ 150 amps, for houseboatds, 30 foot yachts etc. 7200 watt hour output. :-\
Me102288 10 months ago
@GunnySkox ya I know the current, voltage blahblah from led wiring (changing the 60watt bulbs to 3volt (@500miliamp) led's for major energy savings lol Anyway 28600?, ya, thats a lot of watts, why does my drycell put out 1.5 litres a minute at 3 volt @ 5 amps?hmm, a better questions is how many litre's of hho are in one mole of hho. doh I'I thinking you dont need 55 moles an hour to run a voltwagons... those engine's are tiny.
Me102288 10 months ago
@GunnySkox hmmm gimme a minute to calculate how many jewels are in my electricity, wow ok, 28600 watts to make a mole, how many litres is a mole?
Me102288 10 months ago
@GunnySkox because ppl see the video of it running and pass it off as "bullshit" and "fraud" before they understand how iit can work, you know the one's that say "its impossible" even if they see it with there own eyes :-\ and perhaps they might seriously reconsider trying it when they cant afford gasoline. Till then I guess they will just keep paying for gasoline no matter what ppl tell them, truth or not. doesn't matter to me I already know its possible.
Me102288 10 months ago
@GunnySkox haha your as closed minded as I was before I realized there's no way it cant work... doesn't matter what its made of huh.. ya, I guess no matter what we learn or cant learn its imposible no matter what so we might as well pay for gasoline until there's none left and have no alternatives. Lemme ask you an honest question, do you think the world is flat, or do you believe the man who proved it wasn't.
Me102288 10 months ago
THIS VIDEO HAS BEEN FLAGGED INAPPROPRIATE AS SPAM PROMOTING A SCAM AND A FRAUD
MrHobiecat 10 months ago
@GunnySkox fuel cell? uh, you didn't read the comparison.... lol I know fuel cells are very inefficient, thats why that NASA page said COMBUSTION ENGINES.. the comparision they gave was the difference in mileage, hydrogen vs gasoline... 3x LESS hydrogen to achieve same mileage as gasoline... the heat output of hydrogen is LESS then gasoline.. so, if gasoline works.,.. please tell me one "law" that breads. :-\ , as for the electrictity... permanent magnet alternator.
Me102288 10 months ago
anyone who thinks that is fake, has a mouse brain,
japimportssuck 10 months ago
What don't you people get.
Hydrogen and oxygen can run an engine, IF you can get hydrogen for the engine to use
You would have to carry huge tanks of compressed hydrogen to run this.
ntwede 10 months ago
@GunnySkox hmm funny all these laws have nothing to to with the simple combustion engine.. In fact we already know they ruin on almost anything combustable, like propane, natural gas, etc. ignore all the laws and look at whichever fuel is the most effecient at exploding... and well, 2 parts hydrogen/1 part oxygen burns 100x faster then gasoline.. no reason why it shouldnt work....
Me102288 10 months ago
@GunnySkox NASA working on hydrogen tank to fuel standard combustion engines. No matter what law you go by, Hydrogen is atomic... you cant use the same laws..
heres the page at NASA erc.ivv.nasa.gov/vision/earth/everydaylife/apr_zeolite_prt.htm
oh, nasa firgures you need 1/3rd of hydrogen compared to gasoline to attain the same mileage
Me102288 10 months ago
I think it's a good idea, but what happens after the engine burns the hydrogen? Does it reform into steam or water and recycle? I hope..
AKSoapy29 10 months ago
@AKSoapy29 yes.. its the only emmision!
Me102288 10 months ago
@Me102288 Ok now that's just cool! Like a steam engine.
AKSoapy29 10 months ago
oil companies wont let this kind of invention spread and buy them off or kill the people who invent them
legenddart 11 months ago 27
@legenddart 2 late, BMW Hydrogen 7 runs on hydrogen... bmw websites advertising it.. it went through an 8 week test at nasa and passed!
Me102288 8 months ago
@legenddart
You didn't know ? He was poisoned . All blueprints stolen .
resistance0311 7 months ago
@resistance0311 His patents along with the detailed drawings are freely available on the USPTO website. They always have been.
somedudeinva 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@legenddart i see we are watching the same type of videos : )
kodyman20 7 months ago
to bad this dude was killed and the buggy, plans, and everyone who helped with this disapeared
pie5243pie 11 months ago
@pie5243pie like you heard the reporter say.. the pentagon is "interested" in it......
Me102288 10 months ago
Sign me up and let me know when it's ready to purchase. :-)
hydrobot2003 11 months ago
the bent ohma gons shot loads a intrest in this alrite ,,,bang bang;;;;
wearealien1 11 months ago
you know I bet it splits the water, and produces Hydrogen.then that feeds right into the carb.
japimportssuck 11 months ago
@japimportssuck BINGO :-) Brown's gas, hho, hydroxy.... same 200 year old information.
Me102288 10 months ago
yeah I forgot science has never been wrong before
oldscool79 11 months ago
I have no doubt it could use the motion to create electricity, and then split water, but it wouldn't split fast enough.
ntwede 11 months ago
@ntwede uh, you ever heard of an alternator? lol they generate power ..... and 99.9% of all cars and trucks have them :-)
Me102288 10 months ago
@letmeseethat1
So why don't you take the exhaust tube, run it through a box to condense the water vapor and pour it back into the water tank? That would be perpetual motion.
I know some person is going to say "but it uses the water so it can't be recycled"
My question is how does it "use" water??
If you react hydrogen and oxygen, the products will be water(gas) and heat and kinetic energy.
ntwede 11 months ago
@ntwede as i understand it doesnt it burn the hydrogen and leave a oxygen base as a exhust
TheToracat 10 months ago