I am interested in the topics he speaks about but he is sooooo boring to listen to. I tried listening to this guy about various subjects. Things so interesting but he just kills it. He over talks and takes forever to get to the point
Read the book, you twats, before you judge. Are you saying, it's too far fetched, that the government would lie to us, AGAIN, like they do when ever they feel it's "Necessary" ? Wake up people, you are in for a suprise....
Interesting theory. But proof of glass domes? Sorry, how in the world he made the jump from a few small colorations in photographs to proof of glass domes escapes me. Astounding claims require astounding proof and there was none.
I appreciate Richards work but sometimes I think he gets too confident in his own conclusions. That horizon could just as well be proof the photos were taken on earth as the moon hoax people claim. The prism effect? Not sure what to make of that but if there are huge domes on the moon and they didn't want us to know about them why would they take astronaut photos right in front of the domes? You could easily find a domeless backdrop.
Hoagie wants you to believe this is proof the astro-nuts were on the moon, but it actually proves the opposite.
This giant glass structure is a 3M Scotch-light screen (made of densely packed microscopic glass beads) as part of the cinematic process of front-screen projection used, by among others, Stanley Kubrick in the film 2001: A Space Odyssey. The "scaffolding" is merely the structure holding up the screen.
Whatever structures might be on the moon, this ain't it, dude.
@sjdss so what you think that we are the only lifeforms to come about in the entire universe out of the trillions of stars in our galaxy and the trillions of stars in the trillions of other galaxies out of all those possibilities to hold life you still think that we were some fluke occurence never able to happen anywhere elese in the universe. Aliens be real the question now is what do they look like and what the hell do they beilive
@2coobSammy lol it was a refernce to expand your thinking capacity which is obviously limitied to this tiny little planet, im a man of science and it's is illogical to think we are alone, the statistical numbers alone say that not only is there us but hundreds of thousands of different lifeforms scattered throughout the universe. Do the math crunch the numbers then get back to me.
@sjdss Uh...... aliens not real? Dude, we are aliens.... well, to life forms who are not human, like animals and other life out there (if there is any, if not, Rebbecca black or Justin bieber drove them out). We are aliens to them, just like we wonder wtf is that in the sky and stuff, insects probably see us as gods (not saying they're intelligent :P bloody insects).
And it is plain obvious that there are aliens out there, the proof is right here on earth, I will let you find it.
@sjdss I respect your religion and all, but I am not religious, no offence, and it is true that to any non human, even an animal, we are aliens to them.
Oh and btw, there actually is proof that there are aliens, no really there is, im just going to let you find it, its the same about trying to find out if god actually exists alright.
Or maybe look at it this way, aliens are the "gods" that we talk about, like say, the greek gods for example?
@DeathRevenant7 I cant! prove GOD exists! ITS called faith! my proof is look at everything thats the creation! you would have to take on faith aliens exist because there is no proof they do!
@sjdss Look deeper into what he is saying. God did create the fallen angels. The Mayans clearly explain their God -- check it out. It's satan the whole time. He is the god of the world.
@OreoSoleil "aliens" could be "fallen angels"! that would explain their intelligence! and! abilities! dont believe if aliens are real! they come from other planets!
Even if you had 3 freagin years of video recording of blurry light points in the sky, that wouldn't mean shit to me. What I want is 1 single clear picture. Piling up tons of disputable "evidences" doesn't consist in a proof. There is no need for a lot of evidence. Just the need for 1 clear evidence. "What else could it be!?" well... anything? saying they're alien is 1 explaination amonst an infinity of possible explainations.. hence, the probability of it being arbitrarily true is virtualy 0.
none of it is pseudo-scientific. like i said origionally, watch?v=ALpzU-p1B7k&feature=related . theres the link look at the pictures for yourself. if showing objects in MULTIPLE photos is pseudo-scientific and complete error then i apologize. But before u start stating what u think is fact u should look at the evidence from a 2 hour lecture then from one in a quick 5 min video. why else would Puttin (russias leader) have his lecture played 12 times a day in russia?
it rains up there to.. they wont tell you that though... and there are flowers and all that good stuff... Not just some empty ol rock, Naahh, not at all!
It's a spaceship from th Draco Star System. The Reptilians drove it here and have bases on it. That's how they watch us. Didn't your High school history or science teachers explain that? Mine did!
It's funny when the deluded conspiracy theory of glass domes on the moon comes up against the deluded conspiracy theory of a faked moon landing. Then the two deluded conspiracy theorists go back and forth, accusing the other of being dead wrong. And probably crazy. Priceless.
of course there's nothing but glass domes that can generate light difraction heh? I mean there are giant domes everywhere, light hits the surface of the moon which contains dusts and any kind of material tah tcould actually refract light but... it's giant domes. Oh .. and if the domes reflect clear prisms how comes we don't see the domes themselves? that's weird isn't it? Or could it be that the only material that could difrat light was in fact the astronaut helmet that is caught in the pic? duh
@furiousmat you should watch his documentary and read the book, you will shit your pants this video is only ONE EXAMPLE of images that were leaked/stolen from nasa. watch?v=ALpzU-p1B7k&feature=related , theres a lot of parts and a lot of information.
@bLa1r666 I won't. cuz so far I,ve been watching so many references people sent me in hope to convince me and EVERY single time it's the same. Blurry stuff, jumps to wild conclusions... in other words, bullshit. I'm starting to ceise the pathern here. Not wasting time on this anymore. Truth is, there exists no proof whatsoever of any sort of ET life and the only reason why so many people talk about it is because their lack of rigor and scientific understanding leads them to believe anything.
@furiousmat you think that in this universe there is no possibly way for other life to exist? LOL closed minded much? you must be a sheeple. WE WILL make contact it is inevitable, get over it.
@bLa1r666 I said no such thing. I believe there is life somehwere else in the universe but agreeing with that possibility is freagin far from saying that there is a significant probability that this other intelligent lifeform is visiting earth right now. Actually from what we know the probability is infinitesimal. And since there is absolutely no clear evidence whatsoever that they are here, I so far conclude that they aren't. Just saying I,m through with these deluded "facts" and "evidences".
@furiousmat we're is your evidence that they havent been here? do you really think slaves built the pyramids? really? tons and tons of rock moved by slaves? rock thats so heavy our current machinery cant lift it. wheres your evidence that shows these anomolies in the moon pictures arent in the other nasa photos? They are in multiple photos so where is your proof.
@bLa1r666 Well this is exactly what I'm talking about when I say it's all "pseudo science". You're relying on the fact that I can't prove that they don't exist to support the theory that they exist. You're leaving the burden of proof on me and the other skeptics. You're the one claiming there are aliens here, you have to prove it. I'm passive and waiting for proofs that you guys all fail to provide. I have nothing to prove. You're the one with the claim, come with the proof.
@bLa1r666 Every single pictures of UFOs are always blurry, can't gauge the distance, could be anything. The term UFO exists to designate any unidentified flying object. Doesn't mean it's ET, could be an unidentified plane, or anything that you're unable to clearly identify at the moment or from the evidence you get. Hence, we don't know what it is. No proof is required to support that you don't know somehing. But You come up with a theory : they're aliens. Then you have to prove it.
@bLa1r666 And the reason for that is simple : every single time I look to a refered source of "evidence" on this topic all I end up seeing is pseudo-scientific explainations and reasonnings that actually lead nowhere. They're just the product of a bad mix of obsession and lack of scientific understanding. Anyone who has decent knowledge in astrophysics and spectral analysis will tell you that this theory here is nuts. People are like "wow sick". They just don't know what this guy is saying.
These aren't the photographs of the objects the one guy saw. There was a bonified city of sorts back there with a mushroom shape bldg etc. amongst others. Large stuff not a cylinder shape crystal rod. Not the photo's. Those photo's would never be leaked. There to "hit the ball out of the park like"!
hoagland is an amazing case of a successful retarded person ~ con artist ... theres no way he cant know this is all baloney .. i wonder how much money he makes selling this nonnense .. if you go to his facebook page and dont praise and worship his idiocy you get deleted so the illusion there is that everyone agrees with him but the reality is he deletes everyone as fast as he can who doesnt tells the truth....
he deletes everyone who does tell the truth on facebook ...no scientist has ever endorsed him ... steven greer wants 3 million for free energy project but has nothing to offer to justify his begging .. another con artist hooked up with hoagland ... how long will it take before everyone realizes what fakes these guys are .. or maybe they are just entertaining freaks .,,. why else would coast to coast have then on
It's amazing that an obviously disturbed person is not only given a platform in which to exhibit their defect,but they are ENCOURAGED. A sick man who needs help.
I'd love to hear a professional opinion but he seems to be a combination of delusional disorder, grandiosity, and an obvious grudge against NASA due to his failure as a scientist. No prize for guessing why given his theories. The evidence is in. Richard C. Hoagland is a nut.
Yeah we never know what is going on out there in outer space, it's a solid case there must be something out there because why would NASA keep going on there if there was not anything out there then what the F&^K are they spending our tax dollars for going out there some body needs to tell us something, my idea is that we will never get told the truth.
@theFIX2010 Your images are typical. Whatever the spatial resolution of the image, the alleged feature is always just beyond what can be proven. This is true for images of small scale or large scale: you claim artificiality in small rocks on the surface of Mars or in large craters on the moon, or allege Nazi symbols on Mars robots. We never see a higher resolution or closer-up image of the features allegedly seen from a great distance. We likewise never have a closer-up image of small objects.
@theFIX2010 The exception is the Face on Mars which was debunked with a very high resolution photo. (And still Hoagland ran with his theory after this!)
Fact is, no matter what images we have that show a landscape or geography in a certain amount of detail, you people will always claim to see something in the "details"...which is always beyond what the given image can conclusively demonstrate. And so we have the endless idiocies of Hoagland or projectmars dotnet.
Why hasn't Mr. Hoagland ever talked about this glass dome on the radio show: "Coast to Coast AM" he is on almost every week for the past 10 years? Has NASA told him to shut up or else? And that goes for the author of the books: "Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon," and "Secrets of Our Spaceship Moon," By Don Wilson...Has NASA got to him and his publisher as well.....These 2 books prove that our moon is a base for the UFO's right now....And don't forget: the moon rocks were older than our sun.
I agree with phmayor and WSUdowntime. And now another is posting his videos on the Gulf spill. However, if you make a descenting comment over there, it gets deleted and you get a very nasty, cuss word filled message telling you to 'f' off. Of course, I see the same comment deleting here too. Glass domes on the moon? Glass tunnels on Mars?
@moediggity28 Hoagland does NOT work for NASA. Check your facts. He even co-authored a book calling NASA on the carpet for large-scale cover-ups of discoveries which would, in his theory, change our entire concept of physics.
Haha. RCH tries so hard to make himself appear as some expert or of importance. The guy lost his credibility many years ago, but still plays "make belief" and is only fooling himself. His theories can easily be debunked by any science-knowing 10 year old. I guess with age, RCH is appearing to become more delusional than ever. No one pays attention to him who has common sense and an understanding of astronomy, physics and some simple engineering. Now, Noory is his bitch on C2C. RCH=FAIL!.
@WSUdowntime but at least he's willing to embarrass himself by suggesting the idea. I don't agree but somethings he says not in this video but in other things are valid. Can't be right all the time, or do you mistakenly think yourself to be the exception?
@persidie RCH is an anomaly hunter, especially w/ "pixelation artifacts". He takes photos, zooms in on pixels. Zooms in soooo far in which ones starts to see color distortions within the red-green-blue color lights. He'll take these COMMON pixels and pulls stuff out of his butt left & right to suggest something that is nothing. His ideas gets debunked all the time and then he moves onto something new and the cycle repeats. HOAGLAND'S GREATEST ENEMY IS HIGH RESOLUTION.
@WSUdowntime I know. alot of his great discoveries off of images. I'd love him to learn about how wrong he is through learning more about photography. And I really laughed aloud when he said that it's simple to see these "anomalies" by using photoshop. Like really, did you even think about the implications of using photoshop? I have to assume you altered the image because you are using photoshop, you know?
@gman586 do you even know who he is? hes been uncovering this stuff since the apollo missions...before the internet was around. he is not some old crank.
this is fuckinb supid, if there were big glass structures on the moon, couldnt we see theem in the pics instead of just spectrums? or even from eart if light would be shining back off it
There are NO fucking glass domes on the moon. This is so silly. He has shown NOTHING in these pics to prove his theory. Don't get me wrong,it would be pretty awesome if there were,but there aren't.
But don't suggest that to Mr. Hoagland or you'll have to endure his lame reason why it couldn't be from the camera lens (he's an expert on everything apparently). He works backward from his own conclusion, using dramatics and sad bits of rudamentary science. He considers himself a "Ufology Personality" - the guy with "secret connections" in NASA. (He can't say who they are cuz they're secret. Shhh!) Stanton Freedman uses logic and real science. Hoagland is just sad.
@MrFoxfan67 Did you watch the video my friend? Watch and listen carefully between 1:00 and 1:15. I happen to know a little bit about image processing and what this guy does to the images make certain artifacts visible cannot be taken seriously by any sane person. Just for the record, I'm reading Dark Mission, so I'm not just randomly criticising...
Yes I read it last year, enjoy the part were they discover NAZI's through out NASA, I know its hard to swallow, but ask yourself this, Why did we all of a suddon stop going to the moon in 1972. WHY, GOvernment will tell you money and public opinion, since when did money or public opinion stop government from anything. it don't. all of his facts cannot be discarded unless your intellectually dishonest. I have tried for over a year
@MrFoxfan67 You didn't reply to my comment regarding photoshop. Why are you dodging the issue? Instead you are asking questions pretending they are meaningful. That is all Hoagland does as well. I also thought the part with the Nazis and Nasa was interesting it's like Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon...you can link my asshole to Kim Jong-il if you want to, it doesn't mean a conspiracy.
it was called project paper clip and it was a conspiracy... the us government doctored records of scientist to smuggle them into the usa undercover and without public scrutiny.
im not a image processing expert but I have no doubt your wrong or making things up as well.
another moron.. and by removing my comment you're just proving you're a fucking idiot. i mean look how many comments have already been removed hahaha.
The Vatican-Pope-Jesuits-illuminati-NAZIS-CFR run the world. they have all the judges, attorneys, doctors, major corporations, etc. all in their back pocket. bought & paid for, etc. our country is no longer free -we live in tyranny! truth an obscure thing, Oppression & lie is the norm. Were all slaves- our masters, the elite, r at least 50 years ahead of us in knowledge, technology, info., secrets & r using all of it against us!
He got arrested this afternoon! cops threw his ass in the paddy wagon, sooo funny. I got pics of it im trying to download. He had no shit on and was covered in his own vomit. Hoagland's a drunk people
Do you not think the shmucks who are fucking with us wanted to discredit him. The genius of the cover up is not in it's day to day execution but in the gradual drip feed of denial that we experience since birth, so people like yourself will act on their behalf by using a social self policing. Look what happened to David Icke! He has an incredible intellect and tenacity and came forward with some shocking evidence but again the shmucks had already taken care of it by making everyone mock him.
ehhhh, ok lets go back to the start, how to get frigile glass to the moon? where to get so many glass? how would glass not break in those tempretures? na I truly do not believe this theory people
glass can be made anywhere. and because there would be no mositure there i would be stronger than steel making it the ultimate structure to survive impacts.
It's to do with the moister in the Earth's atmosphere. because the moon has no atmosphere it is a vacuum. so the only way to make glass as strong as steel and stronger, on Earth it would have to be made in a vacuum. and i'm not sure thats possible to do just yet.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Hoagland lives three houses down from me. He has built all sorts of crazy stuff in his backyard. Not to mention the constant fighting he and his wife do! Cops there at least once a month. Saw him dead ass drunk puking in front yard this morning. Not sure If I believe a raging alcoholic? just a thought
Yes, NASA did the same color changes on Mars....just compare the color of the explosed cables of the rover lander....the mars shots were different colors than those of earth shots. Mars has a blue/green sky and what looks like a form of vegetation on the surface.
Science, true science, is about looking outside the box, looking into the 'impossible' NASA stands for Never a straight answer.
Bet whose farn? Ectachrome or kodachrome? How many favorites does he get? He speaks well but he is just a Houdini for our time. The perfect gig! Everybody is silent about this because........he just keeps makin the crap up! What real authority would comment? No one! Next MJ is living in that lunar dome with Elvis, Howard Hughes and JFK....let's see who would comment on that.
Nasa won't even try to debunk him,He invites any scientest to debunk them,Nasa will say no comment.Know why,The scientists he has working with him did work on the moon missions and jpl and boeing.But he wants somebody anybody at all to debunk this
Anybody knows why Hoagland do belief that they landed on the moon? Because he belief that NASA are such liers and he is has such a scientifical approach on documented material it is kinda weird that he has no problem with all the moon landing material.
Where did you get this theory from? Anyways there is this new vid on YT called The Lunar Conspiracy (9parts) you really should check that one out....really amazing stuff.
I just dedueced it from all the facts of the first 2 launches and the storys from peeps interview at camelot project.Apollo 13 was a warning shot to stay away.all missions were already paid for therefore they couldn't keep em all on the launch pad.Apollo 20 was a recovery of alien artifacts and/or spacecraft.14 15 16 spotted something and never landed just recon.i maybe wrong about some of the other apollo craft landing But,this is a given.Apollo 20 was extraction or recovery mission.
Really??? Apollo 20?? I mean there could be a secret misson, But with a big ass rocket like the Saturn V, it would be difficult to hide that with out anyone hearing. But who knows, But I am pretty sure all the other lunar modules landed. I think it was 16 who found orange, or a so called orange soil. But as for apollo 20, it never happened, or thats what they want us to know, 18-20 was canceled
So what if NASA has deparments you fucking idiot? Big fucking deal.
People are fucking suckers for anything mysterious -- look at religion, mysticism, poetry, whatever. That doesnt mean something is fucking true you fucking idiot, just cause its myterious.
This guy is goofy-- sorry he is. Poor guy. But you dumb bastards dont have to believe this shit.
Most of you who dont believe dont know if its true or not.
you need an idea about whats going on to realize that, realize nasa images are doctored (proven) and #2 the media is like nasa, also doctored, both cannot be believed, so people like Wilcox and Hoagland are bringing these things up and its making sense if you actually listen to it, John Lear though has seemed to be one of the guys who you dunno to believe or not though, he keeps changing his stories.
Hoagland looks like an idiot now, these lights are from the objective of course, how stupid he thinks we are? actually there are many people that never made a picture in their life of course
Yes, it could be true, okay. Everyone at NASA could be lying. They could have magically broken through the glass cover on the moon when they landed. And then glued it together when they left, Im sure they took glass glue.
I admit, it might be true. And the guy I know might have to build a hoop of light seven times bigger than the earth so Jesus can see it when he returns.
I dont think everybody at nasa knows whats going on...nasa is highly compartmentalized...people know only as much as they need to know to do thier job correctly.
this is why some people can know things and other dont.
Dude, the Photographs are official NASA photographs. Lenseflares are round, not straight rectangles of rainbows. his Hypothesis could be correct. I cant prove him right, but nor can you neither prove him wrong. Unless ofcourse you have a spaceship we can get in a go look ourselves. time will tell if nasa has lied to us for years. it'll all come out in the end. i just hope i am alive when it does.
thank you for your intelligence. these people should read his book befor spoting comments. the prizms are very symmetrical. not to mention these aren't the only thing they've captured in photos.
How would nature create a tower miles high on the moon.
The little green men are actually terrans, i.e., humans, from this planet and beyond. the fact of the matter is, we have not originated from this planet. And a global massive cover up, lies upon lies upon lies, are meant to suppress us from this ultimate truth.
How did the lander penetrate this glass dome? I was also under the impression that cameras use glass lenses, each with tiny imperfections and scratches.
I'm also unclear as to his use of the word 'sunrise', as he mentions (and we can see clearly) that the sun is behind the POV and very much risen.
Before this is spammed, I'd just like to say that I'm not really bothered either way and It'd be great if Hoagland was right but I'm just not fully clear on what he means.
doesnt matter,maybe its all his interpretation but "the ufo-problem" is real !
ITS REAL,and maybe the next years we will know
who uses this phenomenen only as a moneymaking-cow and who knows more ?
i think, its real and there is not only one person in the world who knows exactly ,where there come from or why there here or how they looks like, maybe roswell was real ,maybe ?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
total and utter nonsense. A wannabeish scientist talking about science he does not fully comprehend. There is NO-ONE out there. I repeat NO-ONE. We are alone in this universe. A whim, an accident and..we are bound to vanish. Mark my words.
lol a wannabe scientist?if hoaglands that then what are u?makes u not quallified to rubbish him.what an ignorant person u r even if we are an accidnet (im sure u wer to ur parents) then in the vastness of the universe ur saying this "accident" couldnt have occured again and again? mark my words ur brain cells vanished long ago oh and for the record walter kronkite thought more of hoagland than a wannabe scientist
I am interested in the topics he speaks about but he is sooooo boring to listen to. I tried listening to this guy about various subjects. Things so interesting but he just kills it. He over talks and takes forever to get to the point
donniesgotu 1 month ago
Fucking nutcase.
Fmaack 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
An actual stargate/wormhole/portal-thing was captured on film in New Mexico.
The footage can be seen within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is currently parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page.
I'm not selling anything, just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions of "modern life". Thanks.
peopledick 3 months ago
Read the book, you twats, before you judge. Are you saying, it's too far fetched, that the government would lie to us, AGAIN, like they do when ever they feel it's "Necessary" ? Wake up people, you are in for a suprise....
Songsword87 4 months ago
@Songsword87 lol nobody says the government aint lying... glassdomes on the moon? seriously?
blafuckyou 1 day ago
Interesting theory. But proof of glass domes? Sorry, how in the world he made the jump from a few small colorations in photographs to proof of glass domes escapes me. Astounding claims require astounding proof and there was none.
doverlin 4 months ago in playlist More videos from Lindasufos 2
He is too convoluted for me. I loose interest after 5 minutes
PrestoWind 5 months ago
I appreciate Richards work but sometimes I think he gets too confident in his own conclusions. That horizon could just as well be proof the photos were taken on earth as the moon hoax people claim. The prism effect? Not sure what to make of that but if there are huge domes on the moon and they didn't want us to know about them why would they take astronaut photos right in front of the domes? You could easily find a domeless backdrop.
Thopter 6 months ago
@Thopter The photos were leaked.
gamersxs 5 months ago
Hoagie wants you to believe this is proof the astro-nuts were on the moon, but it actually proves the opposite.
This giant glass structure is a 3M Scotch-light screen (made of densely packed microscopic glass beads) as part of the cinematic process of front-screen projection used, by among others, Stanley Kubrick in the film 2001: A Space Odyssey. The "scaffolding" is merely the structure holding up the screen.
Whatever structures might be on the moon, this ain't it, dude.
bondurango 7 months ago
i think they mix his name for his safety i knew about this in underground videos over 10 years ago first letters i think start holgain
MrKtaniguchi 8 months ago
amazing how much money is spent on proving something not even real! like aliens!
sjdss 11 months ago 2
@sjdss so what you think that we are the only lifeforms to come about in the entire universe out of the trillions of stars in our galaxy and the trillions of stars in the trillions of other galaxies out of all those possibilities to hold life you still think that we were some fluke occurence never able to happen anywhere elese in the universe. Aliens be real the question now is what do they look like and what the hell do they beilive
2coobSammy 9 months ago
@2coobSammy when you get proof?! get back to me!
sjdss 8 months ago
@sjdss proof is right in front of you dude just look at the stars
2coobSammy 8 months ago
@2coobSammy look at the stars! is proof?! where is proof?! or do you take this on faith! meaning aliens are some kind of god to you!
sjdss 8 months ago
@2coobSammy lol it was a refernce to expand your thinking capacity which is obviously limitied to this tiny little planet, im a man of science and it's is illogical to think we are alone, the statistical numbers alone say that not only is there us but hundreds of thousands of different lifeforms scattered throughout the universe. Do the math crunch the numbers then get back to me.
2coobSammy 8 months ago
@sjdss Uh...... aliens not real? Dude, we are aliens.... well, to life forms who are not human, like animals and other life out there (if there is any, if not, Rebbecca black or Justin bieber drove them out). We are aliens to them, just like we wonder wtf is that in the sky and stuff, insects probably see us as gods (not saying they're intelligent :P bloody insects).
And it is plain obvious that there are aliens out there, the proof is right here on earth, I will let you find it.
DeathRevenant7 7 months ago
@DeathRevenant7 wtf?! are you talking about?! there is ZERO proof of aliens! humans are created beings by GOD! not aliens!
sjdss 7 months ago
@sjdss I respect your religion and all, but I am not religious, no offence, and it is true that to any non human, even an animal, we are aliens to them.
Oh and btw, there actually is proof that there are aliens, no really there is, im just going to let you find it, its the same about trying to find out if god actually exists alright.
Or maybe look at it this way, aliens are the "gods" that we talk about, like say, the greek gods for example?
DeathRevenant7 7 months ago
@DeathRevenant7 I cant! prove GOD exists! ITS called faith! my proof is look at everything thats the creation! you would have to take on faith aliens exist because there is no proof they do!
sjdss 7 months ago
@sjdss No offence to your religion but that's the funniest thing I have heard in a while....
Seriously? Looking at everything created doesn't prove anything, even looking at the stars doesn't prove anything.
But it is not even a prediction it is a fact that there are other life forms, we just haven't found them yet, or they haven't found us.
DeathRevenant7 7 months ago
@DeathRevenant7 thats why its called faith! believing in god or believing "we are not alone"! people cant prove either!
sjdss 7 months ago
@sjdss Now your getting my point
DeathRevenant7 7 months ago
@sjdss Look deeper into what he is saying. God did create the fallen angels. The Mayans clearly explain their God -- check it out. It's satan the whole time. He is the god of the world.
OreoSoleil 5 months ago in playlist THE MOON THE TRUTH
@OreoSoleil "aliens" could be "fallen angels"! that would explain their intelligence! and! abilities! dont believe if aliens are real! they come from other planets!
"
sjdss 5 months ago
What's he saying? That our moon photos were filmed inside
a glass dome? This doesn't make sense. .
two45triox 11 months ago
you didnt even watch the full video did you. your arrogance is uncanny.
bLa1r666 11 months ago
Even if you had 3 freagin years of video recording of blurry light points in the sky, that wouldn't mean shit to me. What I want is 1 single clear picture. Piling up tons of disputable "evidences" doesn't consist in a proof. There is no need for a lot of evidence. Just the need for 1 clear evidence. "What else could it be!?" well... anything? saying they're alien is 1 explaination amonst an infinity of possible explainations.. hence, the probability of it being arbitrarily true is virtualy 0.
furiousmat 11 months ago
none of it is pseudo-scientific. like i said origionally, watch?v=ALpzU-p1B7k&feature=related . theres the link look at the pictures for yourself. if showing objects in MULTIPLE photos is pseudo-scientific and complete error then i apologize. But before u start stating what u think is fact u should look at the evidence from a 2 hour lecture then from one in a quick 5 min video. why else would Puttin (russias leader) have his lecture played 12 times a day in russia?
bLa1r666 11 months ago
How much hair spray does it take to hold his hair like that?
SpincterManBubba 1 year ago
The sun Freaking Rises on the moon!?.. DAAAMMMNNIIII holy hell sunrise on the moon
houstonTx457000 1 year ago
it rains up there to.. they wont tell you that though... and there are flowers and all that good stuff... Not just some empty ol rock, Naahh, not at all!
houstonTx457000 1 year ago
@houstonTx457000 There is a McDonald's with a glass dome.
Fmaack 1 month ago
It's a spaceship from th Draco Star System. The Reptilians drove it here and have bases on it. That's how they watch us. Didn't your High school history or science teachers explain that? Mine did!
bumcheek7 1 year ago
It's funny when the deluded conspiracy theory of glass domes on the moon comes up against the deluded conspiracy theory of a faked moon landing. Then the two deluded conspiracy theorists go back and forth, accusing the other of being dead wrong. And probably crazy. Priceless.
termsofusepolice 1 year ago
@termsofusepolice I for one enjoyed the insanity. Great comment.
Fmaack 1 month ago
of course there's nothing but glass domes that can generate light difraction heh? I mean there are giant domes everywhere, light hits the surface of the moon which contains dusts and any kind of material tah tcould actually refract light but... it's giant domes. Oh .. and if the domes reflect clear prisms how comes we don't see the domes themselves? that's weird isn't it? Or could it be that the only material that could difrat light was in fact the astronaut helmet that is caught in the pic? duh
furiousmat 1 year ago
@furiousmat you should watch his documentary and read the book, you will shit your pants this video is only ONE EXAMPLE of images that were leaked/stolen from nasa. watch?v=ALpzU-p1B7k&feature=related , theres a lot of parts and a lot of information.
bLa1r666 11 months ago
@bLa1r666 I won't. cuz so far I,ve been watching so many references people sent me in hope to convince me and EVERY single time it's the same. Blurry stuff, jumps to wild conclusions... in other words, bullshit. I'm starting to ceise the pathern here. Not wasting time on this anymore. Truth is, there exists no proof whatsoever of any sort of ET life and the only reason why so many people talk about it is because their lack of rigor and scientific understanding leads them to believe anything.
furiousmat 11 months ago
@furiousmat you think that in this universe there is no possibly way for other life to exist? LOL closed minded much? you must be a sheeple. WE WILL make contact it is inevitable, get over it.
bLa1r666 11 months ago
@bLa1r666 I said no such thing. I believe there is life somehwere else in the universe but agreeing with that possibility is freagin far from saying that there is a significant probability that this other intelligent lifeform is visiting earth right now. Actually from what we know the probability is infinitesimal. And since there is absolutely no clear evidence whatsoever that they are here, I so far conclude that they aren't. Just saying I,m through with these deluded "facts" and "evidences".
furiousmat 11 months ago
@furiousmat we're is your evidence that they havent been here? do you really think slaves built the pyramids? really? tons and tons of rock moved by slaves? rock thats so heavy our current machinery cant lift it. wheres your evidence that shows these anomolies in the moon pictures arent in the other nasa photos? They are in multiple photos so where is your proof.
bLa1r666 11 months ago
@bLa1r666 Well this is exactly what I'm talking about when I say it's all "pseudo science". You're relying on the fact that I can't prove that they don't exist to support the theory that they exist. You're leaving the burden of proof on me and the other skeptics. You're the one claiming there are aliens here, you have to prove it. I'm passive and waiting for proofs that you guys all fail to provide. I have nothing to prove. You're the one with the claim, come with the proof.
furiousmat 11 months ago
@bLa1r666 Every single pictures of UFOs are always blurry, can't gauge the distance, could be anything. The term UFO exists to designate any unidentified flying object. Doesn't mean it's ET, could be an unidentified plane, or anything that you're unable to clearly identify at the moment or from the evidence you get. Hence, we don't know what it is. No proof is required to support that you don't know somehing. But You come up with a theory : they're aliens. Then you have to prove it.
furiousmat 11 months ago
@bLa1r666 And the reason for that is simple : every single time I look to a refered source of "evidence" on this topic all I end up seeing is pseudo-scientific explainations and reasonnings that actually lead nowhere. They're just the product of a bad mix of obsession and lack of scientific understanding. Anyone who has decent knowledge in astrophysics and spectral analysis will tell you that this theory here is nuts. People are like "wow sick". They just don't know what this guy is saying.
furiousmat 11 months ago
Maybe this is where the idea for Bio-Dome the movie came from?
amtek666 1 year ago
These aren't the photographs of the objects the one guy saw. There was a bonified city of sorts back there with a mushroom shape bldg etc. amongst others. Large stuff not a cylinder shape crystal rod. Not the photo's. Those photo's would never be leaked. There to "hit the ball out of the park like"!
rocknrollhoocheecoo 1 year ago
its funny how no one that comments on this video has any kind of comments that prove Hoagland wrong.
polevaultrockstr 1 year ago
my brain has been fried by this fucktards bullshit
mush2202 1 year ago
@mush2202 - if youre; not ready for it, then go elsewhere.. it doesnt mean he;s lying just cos you dont understand it..!
SovereignBeing 1 year ago
it's sad that people believe this guy :(
sebastiansz 1 year ago
@sebastiansz ur sad..that u dont
lordconan1976 1 year ago
hoagland is an amazing case of a successful retarded person ~ con artist ... theres no way he cant know this is all baloney .. i wonder how much money he makes selling this nonnense .. if you go to his facebook page and dont praise and worship his idiocy you get deleted so the illusion there is that everyone agrees with him but the reality is he deletes everyone as fast as he can who doesnt tells the truth....
JOOODYJOOODY 1 year ago
he deletes everyone who does tell the truth on facebook ...no scientist has ever endorsed him ... steven greer wants 3 million for free energy project but has nothing to offer to justify his begging .. another con artist hooked up with hoagland ... how long will it take before everyone realizes what fakes these guys are .. or maybe they are just entertaining freaks .,,. why else would coast to coast have then on
JOOODYJOOODY 1 year ago
It's amazing that an obviously disturbed person is not only given a platform in which to exhibit their defect,but they are ENCOURAGED. A sick man who needs help.
Chrisdrumz 1 year ago
I'd love to hear a professional opinion but he seems to be a combination of delusional disorder, grandiosity, and an obvious grudge against NASA due to his failure as a scientist. No prize for guessing why given his theories. The evidence is in. Richard C. Hoagland is a nut.
horsie111 1 year ago
Yeah we never know what is going on out there in outer space, it's a solid case there must be something out there because why would NASA keep going on there if there was not anything out there then what the F&^K are they spending our tax dollars for going out there some body needs to tell us something, my idea is that we will never get told the truth.
numismatic2012 1 year ago
so the evidence for alien civilizations relies on these few shitty images?
fervent246 1 year ago
@fervent246 i send u a video plz watch
theFIX2010 1 year ago
@theFIX2010 Your images are typical. Whatever the spatial resolution of the image, the alleged feature is always just beyond what can be proven. This is true for images of small scale or large scale: you claim artificiality in small rocks on the surface of Mars or in large craters on the moon, or allege Nazi symbols on Mars robots. We never see a higher resolution or closer-up image of the features allegedly seen from a great distance. We likewise never have a closer-up image of small objects.
horsie111 1 year ago
@theFIX2010 The exception is the Face on Mars which was debunked with a very high resolution photo. (And still Hoagland ran with his theory after this!)
Fact is, no matter what images we have that show a landscape or geography in a certain amount of detail, you people will always claim to see something in the "details"...which is always beyond what the given image can conclusively demonstrate. And so we have the endless idiocies of Hoagland or projectmars dotnet.
horsie111 1 year ago
@horsie111 fact remains., there was life on mars.. just like there is here.. too many structures there to contest that..!
SovereignBeing 1 year ago
There are two types of people in the world... people stupid enough to believe Hoagland and people who know better.
Dhadzinsky 1 year ago
@Dhadzinsky i send u a video plz watch
theFIX2010 1 year ago
Why hasn't Mr. Hoagland ever talked about this glass dome on the radio show: "Coast to Coast AM" he is on almost every week for the past 10 years? Has NASA told him to shut up or else? And that goes for the author of the books: "Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon," and "Secrets of Our Spaceship Moon," By Don Wilson...Has NASA got to him and his publisher as well.....These 2 books prove that our moon is a base for the UFO's right now....And don't forget: the moon rocks were older than our sun.
MoebiusTripper 1 year ago
Just like you! HAHAHAHA!!! Fuckin moron....
jordan2104 1 year ago
what a complete fucking twat lol if you believe this nut then your more crazy than him!
jrgniuwer 1 year ago
LOL......SUNRISE IN THE STUDIO.... Oh well I guess in the 50's and 60's they didnt have money enough to buy a better and Bigger Studio's
Ebdan88 1 year ago
Cant see the stars but.
thano111 1 year ago
He is brilliant in this.
Theris1011 1 year ago
???
mighty58 1 year ago
I've been to the moon. Does that make me gay?
ParadigmShift22 1 year ago
@ParadigmShift22 Only if you 69 in zero grvavity.
southparkresident 1 year ago
@ParadigmShift22
Yes!
marcusgael 1 year ago
I agree with phmayor and WSUdowntime. And now another is posting his videos on the Gulf spill. However, if you make a descenting comment over there, it gets deleted and you get a very nasty, cuss word filled message telling you to 'f' off. Of course, I see the same comment deleting here too. Glass domes on the moon? Glass tunnels on Mars?
cajuncy 1 year ago
I actually think he's mentally ill.
phmayor 1 year ago
@phmayor seeing as he works with and for nasa.id say that youre mentally ill
moediggity28 1 year ago
@moediggity28 Hoagland does NOT work for NASA. Check your facts. He even co-authored a book calling NASA on the carpet for large-scale cover-ups of discoveries which would, in his theory, change our entire concept of physics.
doggolives 1 year ago
Haha. RCH tries so hard to make himself appear as some expert or of importance. The guy lost his credibility many years ago, but still plays "make belief" and is only fooling himself. His theories can easily be debunked by any science-knowing 10 year old. I guess with age, RCH is appearing to become more delusional than ever. No one pays attention to him who has common sense and an understanding of astronomy, physics and some simple engineering. Now, Noory is his bitch on C2C. RCH=FAIL!.
WSUdowntime 1 year ago
@WSUdowntime but at least he's willing to embarrass himself by suggesting the idea. I don't agree but somethings he says not in this video but in other things are valid. Can't be right all the time, or do you mistakenly think yourself to be the exception?
persidie 1 year ago
@persidie RCH is an anomaly hunter, especially w/ "pixelation artifacts". He takes photos, zooms in on pixels. Zooms in soooo far in which ones starts to see color distortions within the red-green-blue color lights. He'll take these COMMON pixels and pulls stuff out of his butt left & right to suggest something that is nothing. His ideas gets debunked all the time and then he moves onto something new and the cycle repeats. HOAGLAND'S GREATEST ENEMY IS HIGH RESOLUTION.
WSUdowntime 1 year ago
@WSUdowntime I know. alot of his great discoveries off of images. I'd love him to learn about how wrong he is through learning more about photography. And I really laughed aloud when he said that it's simple to see these "anomalies" by using photoshop. Like really, did you even think about the implications of using photoshop? I have to assume you altered the image because you are using photoshop, you know?
persidie 1 year ago
RCH is spot on and the expert
butlincat1 1 year ago
@gman586 do you even know who he is? hes been uncovering this stuff since the apollo missions...before the internet was around. he is not some old crank.
NWM11Bravo 1 year ago
When I was a kid I thought Hoagland was so fuckin cool.
Now I see he's just grasping straws.
highlander2107 1 year ago
Wow, this is the biggest stretch i've ever seen.
lmusho 1 year ago
this is fuckinb supid, if there were big glass structures on the moon, couldnt we see theem in the pics instead of just spectrums? or even from eart if light would be shining back off it
superiorcultivator 1 year ago
wow lotta idiots visiting this video
Colt2571 1 year ago
@Colt2571 thanks for joining the club
AscensionSeries 1 year ago
@Colt2571 that must have been what got you to watch it right?
BADSYNE 1 year ago
There are NO fucking glass domes on the moon. This is so silly. He has shown NOTHING in these pics to prove his theory. Don't get me wrong,it would be pretty awesome if there were,but there aren't.
Chrisdrumz 1 year ago
and u know this for sure because...?
Colt2571 1 year ago
Hoagland is simply a liar.
indie3 1 year ago
or maybe its the string they used to hang from
CONCUSSION187 1 year ago
maybe they were on earth not on the moon LOL DUH
CONCUSSION187 1 year ago
Is it me ,or could the prisms not have been an effect of the camera that took the pictures ? Kudos to Mr. Hoagland,though.
horsemad1670 2 years ago
But don't suggest that to Mr. Hoagland or you'll have to endure his lame reason why it couldn't be from the camera lens (he's an expert on everything apparently). He works backward from his own conclusion, using dramatics and sad bits of rudamentary science. He considers himself a "Ufology Personality" - the guy with "secret connections" in NASA. (He can't say who they are cuz they're secret. Shhh!) Stanton Freedman uses logic and real science. Hoagland is just sad.
m1abrams2009 1 year ago
did hoagland photoshop the mars pyramids and face as well? oh wait, those are clearly visible in official unadulterated nasa photographs
youngthizz81 2 years ago
exactly
Colt2571 1 year ago
All of these "discoveries" were made after the use of Photoshop. This is bullshit, I rest my case.
neoldd1 2 years ago
Sorry, but this was discovered off of a 1st generation copy from NASA. 1969. A little bit before photoshop and probably before you was born no doubt.
MrFoxfan67 2 years ago
@MrFoxfan67 Did you watch the video my friend? Watch and listen carefully between 1:00 and 1:15. I happen to know a little bit about image processing and what this guy does to the images make certain artifacts visible cannot be taken seriously by any sane person. Just for the record, I'm reading Dark Mission, so I'm not just randomly criticising...
neoldd1 2 years ago
Yes I read it last year, enjoy the part were they discover NAZI's through out NASA, I know its hard to swallow, but ask yourself this, Why did we all of a suddon stop going to the moon in 1972. WHY, GOvernment will tell you money and public opinion, since when did money or public opinion stop government from anything. it don't. all of his facts cannot be discarded unless your intellectually dishonest. I have tried for over a year
MrFoxfan67 2 years ago
@MrFoxfan67 You didn't reply to my comment regarding photoshop. Why are you dodging the issue? Instead you are asking questions pretending they are meaningful. That is all Hoagland does as well. I also thought the part with the Nazis and Nasa was interesting it's like Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon...you can link my asshole to Kim Jong-il if you want to, it doesn't mean a conspiracy.
neoldd1 2 years ago
it was called project paper clip and it was a conspiracy... the us government doctored records of scientist to smuggle them into the usa undercover and without public scrutiny.
im not a image processing expert but I have no doubt your wrong or making things up as well.
CanadianDominion 1 year ago
glass lenses by any chance?
MPireMallDOTnet 2 years ago
another moron.. and by removing my comment you're just proving you're a fucking idiot. i mean look how many comments have already been removed hahaha.
feartheneon 2 years ago
I do find some of what he talks about somewhat interesting but he does have televangelist hair.
tritiumwind 2 years ago
Comment removed
nepmon 2 years ago
Comment removed
nepmon 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Vatican-Pope-Jesuits-illuminati-NAZIS-CFR run the world. they have all the judges, attorneys, doctors, major corporations, etc. all in their back pocket. bought & paid for, etc. our country is no longer free -we live in tyranny! truth an obscure thing, Oppression & lie is the norm. Were all slaves- our masters, the elite, r at least 50 years ahead of us in knowledge, technology, info., secrets & r using all of it against us!
Go here:
truthknowledge. com
Spread it! Time is running out!
MopDMTBARTL 2 years ago
keep an eye these guys sirs they could be trouble...
johnsmdm 2 years ago
Geez, the CIA, oops I mean Richy, really slapped us with our own ignorance on this one.
Iggyocracy 2 years ago
yeah because photoshop is such an amazing tool for not editing images!
mrchoochoohead 2 years ago
And those are not lense flairs?
BlueKyne 2 years ago
Comment removed
sweJN 2 years ago
The biggest glass bong you ever saw
Kenzofeis 2 years ago
what?
sweJN 2 years ago
amazing
kreesislame5 2 years ago
He got arrested this afternoon! cops threw his ass in the paddy wagon, sooo funny. I got pics of it im trying to download. He had no shit on and was covered in his own vomit. Hoagland's a drunk people
digs344 2 years ago
Where did you read that, Hoagland doesn't seem to be that kind of man. Shameful!
BlueKyne 2 years ago
Do you not think the shmucks who are fucking with us wanted to discredit him. The genius of the cover up is not in it's day to day execution but in the gradual drip feed of denial that we experience since birth, so people like yourself will act on their behalf by using a social self policing. Look what happened to David Icke! He has an incredible intellect and tenacity and came forward with some shocking evidence but again the shmucks had already taken care of it by making everyone mock him.
CaptainFrenzy 2 years ago
ehhhh, ok lets go back to the start, how to get frigile glass to the moon? where to get so many glass? how would glass not break in those tempretures? na I truly do not believe this theory people
yusefmou 2 years ago
glass can be made anywhere. and because there would be no mositure there i would be stronger than steel making it the ultimate structure to survive impacts.
Xfactor09ful 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
sweJN 2 years ago
It's to do with the moister in the Earth's atmosphere. because the moon has no atmosphere it is a vacuum. so the only way to make glass as strong as steel and stronger, on Earth it would have to be made in a vacuum. and i'm not sure thats possible to do just yet.
stelivo1 2 years ago
** *moisture**
stelivo1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hoagland lives three houses down from me. He has built all sorts of crazy stuff in his backyard. Not to mention the constant fighting he and his wife do! Cops there at least once a month. Saw him dead ass drunk puking in front yard this morning. Not sure If I believe a raging alcoholic? just a thought
digs344 2 years ago
You're full of shit stfu
downscale 2 years ago
This guy's argument is so full of holes it's not even worth getting started!
Apparently we don't build with glass on Earth!!!??
buttonboxes2711 2 years ago
not 100% glass num-nuts, it has steel structure and foundation of steel reenforced concreate on Earth.
downscale 2 years ago
Walter Cronkite was a Bohemian Grove member !
nibus9 2 years ago
This has more evidence than his usual claims. However, that doesn't say much...
Silencio511 2 years ago
Yes, NASA did the same color changes on Mars....just compare the color of the explosed cables of the rover lander....the mars shots were different colors than those of earth shots. Mars has a blue/green sky and what looks like a form of vegetation on the surface.
Science, true science, is about looking outside the box, looking into the 'impossible' NASA stands for Never a straight answer.
TheCastellan 2 years ago
lets Ransack NASA !! LET US GROUP UP AND RANSACK IT !!!!!!!!!
nibus9 2 years ago
I'd rather have NASA at gunpoint and make them tell the truth to everyone.
Since the joe six pack masses would rather believe authority figures rather than what their own eyes tell them, and the evidence in front of them.
TheCastellan 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Good idea - you go first!
utube9000 2 years ago
well done,
you found that the lens of the camera used to take the picture refracts light and makes a prism.
NOT proof that there are glass domes on the moon..!! haha
adamantine106 2 years ago
richard at his best!...nuking us slowly...destroying the cubicle mind...jumping to warp!...godspeed!
rocketshipstud2 2 years ago
Bet whose farn? Ectachrome or kodachrome? How many favorites does he get? He speaks well but he is just a Houdini for our time. The perfect gig! Everybody is silent about this because........he just keeps makin the crap up! What real authority would comment? No one! Next MJ is living in that lunar dome with Elvis, Howard Hughes and JFK....let's see who would comment on that.
markmoretto 2 years ago
Nasa won't even try to debunk him,He invites any scientest to debunk them,Nasa will say no comment.Know why,The scientists he has working with him did work on the moon missions and jpl and boeing.But he wants somebody anybody at all to debunk this
cobramark8 2 years ago
and the thing is, nobody can..
madguitarist911 2 years ago
read dark mission then comment. u cant comment unless u have info to comment on, unless u are a journalist
masheenist 2 years ago
Anybody knows why Hoagland do belief that they landed on the moon? Because he belief that NASA are such liers and he is has such a scientifical approach on documented material it is kinda weird that he has no problem with all the moon landing material.
Onesnowbal 2 years ago
He understands the math of the data and can tell if it adds up. Math doesnt lie...man does
rahkriga 2 years ago
11 12 and 20 were real missions.The rest were done with footage of the moon from those first 2 and a soundstage.
cobramark8 2 years ago
Where did you get this theory from? Anyways there is this new vid on YT called The Lunar Conspiracy (9parts) you really should check that one out....really amazing stuff.
Onesnowbal 2 years ago
I just dedueced it from all the facts of the first 2 launches and the storys from peeps interview at camelot project.Apollo 13 was a warning shot to stay away.all missions were already paid for therefore they couldn't keep em all on the launch pad.Apollo 20 was a recovery of alien artifacts and/or spacecraft.14 15 16 spotted something and never landed just recon.i maybe wrong about some of the other apollo craft landing But,this is a given.Apollo 20 was extraction or recovery mission.
cobramark8 2 years ago
Is this your own personal theory or is it shared by Hoagland or others? What are the "major" theories going around?
utube9000 2 years ago
@cobramark8
Really??? Apollo 20?? I mean there could be a secret misson, But with a big ass rocket like the Saturn V, it would be difficult to hide that with out anyone hearing. But who knows, But I am pretty sure all the other lunar modules landed. I think it was 16 who found orange, or a so called orange soil. But as for apollo 20, it never happened, or thats what they want us to know, 18-20 was canceled
petrucc 1 year ago
So what if NASA has deparments you fucking idiot? Big fucking deal.
People are fucking suckers for anything mysterious -- look at religion, mysticism, poetry, whatever. That doesnt mean something is fucking true you fucking idiot, just cause its myterious.
This guy is goofy-- sorry he is. Poor guy. But you dumb bastards dont have to believe this shit.
In other words, dumb fuchs, truth matters.
12FlyMe 2 years ago
Most of you who dont believe dont know if its true or not.
you need an idea about whats going on to realize that, realize nasa images are doctored (proven) and #2 the media is like nasa, also doctored, both cannot be believed, so people like Wilcox and Hoagland are bringing these things up and its making sense if you actually listen to it, John Lear though has seemed to be one of the guys who you dunno to believe or not though, he keeps changing his stories.
wwepatriot 2 years ago
To each there own..I still think the moon landing was a hoax..thats just my op-pion
Sgipon 2 years ago
Just because there might well be life elsewhere, has ZERO to do with if there is a glass dome on the moon.
There are people who are sincere as hell, and sincerely wrong. Happens all the time. The human mind is master at believing it's own bullship.
If you took t his guy to the moon, and showed him a glassless moon, he would insist someone took elsehwhere.
No amount of proof is going to work with this guy. He doesnt really care about the truth. Most people don;t We care about our ego
BullshipDetector 2 years ago
Hoagland looks like an idiot now, these lights are from the objective of course, how stupid he thinks we are? actually there are many people that never made a picture in their life of course
dumbnetworks 2 years ago
You guys obviously didn't read the book.
He's been working with photographs probably since before ya'll were born.
and these are official nasa photos. (no doctoring)
southparkresident 2 years ago
hmm so you say that are glass domes on the moon? LOL anyway chill... There aren't. And he is an old man with very little things to do.
dumbnetworks 2 years ago
Youre an idiot
southparkresident 2 years ago
look mr hankey you are realy stupid, but probably all your family knows that, so this is not news for you. STOP using internet!
dumbnetworks 2 years ago
"rely"? Stop using internet. You mean "the" internet.?
Ha Ha!
who's stupid here.
southparkresident 2 years ago
hmm interesting, you didn't passed. you know that you are not alowed to use your mum's computer?
dumbnetworks 2 years ago
Yes, it could be true, okay. Everyone at NASA could be lying. They could have magically broken through the glass cover on the moon when they landed. And then glued it together when they left, Im sure they took glass glue.
I admit, it might be true. And the guy I know might have to build a hoop of light seven times bigger than the earth so Jesus can see it when he returns.
You just never know.
BullshipDetector 2 years ago
WOW... there is inteligence on the NET after all!! thank god!
dumbnetworks 2 years ago
I dont think everybody at nasa knows whats going on...nasa is highly compartmentalized...people know only as much as they need to know to do thier job correctly.
this is why some people can know things and other dont.
NWM11Bravo 2 years ago
NASA is run on a "need to know basis" , it's pretty much a millitary entity
TheCastellan 2 years ago
Well who knows? Clearly he doesn't.
I know a guy who insists he has to build a hoop of light seven times brighter than the sun, around the earth, so Jesus can see it,when he returns.
I know other lunantics who believe in the Fairtax -- which pretends they can get most government revenue by taxing the government.
I love these people,. So much more fun than most.
12FlyMe 2 years ago
Dude, the Photographs are official NASA photographs. Lenseflares are round, not straight rectangles of rainbows. his Hypothesis could be correct. I cant prove him right, but nor can you neither prove him wrong. Unless ofcourse you have a spaceship we can get in a go look ourselves. time will tell if nasa has lied to us for years. it'll all come out in the end. i just hope i am alive when it does.
LordBicen 2 years ago
thank you for your intelligence. these people should read his book befor spoting comments. the prizms are very symmetrical. not to mention these aren't the only thing they've captured in photos.
How would nature create a tower miles high on the moon.
southparkresident 2 years ago 2
The little green men are actually terrans, i.e., humans, from this planet and beyond. the fact of the matter is, we have not originated from this planet. And a global massive cover up, lies upon lies upon lies, are meant to suppress us from this ultimate truth.
We ARE the aliens.
litetheory 2 years ago
couldnt this be proof that the moon videos were done on earth in a studio?
soulmate702000 2 years ago
He said in his book the domes have long been broken
GeorgeM1009 2 years ago
How did the lander penetrate this glass dome? I was also under the impression that cameras use glass lenses, each with tiny imperfections and scratches.
I'm also unclear as to his use of the word 'sunrise', as he mentions (and we can see clearly) that the sun is behind the POV and very much risen.
Before this is spammed, I'd just like to say that I'm not really bothered either way and It'd be great if Hoagland was right but I'm just not fully clear on what he means.
holydave 2 years ago
doesnt matter,maybe its all his interpretation but "the ufo-problem" is real !
ITS REAL,and maybe the next years we will know
who uses this phenomenen only as a moneymaking-cow and who knows more ?
i think, its real and there is not only one person in the world who knows exactly ,where there come from or why there here or how they looks like, maybe roswell was real ,maybe ?
But there is a UFo problem
boilerheadz 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
total and utter nonsense. A wannabeish scientist talking about science he does not fully comprehend. There is NO-ONE out there. I repeat NO-ONE. We are alone in this universe. A whim, an accident and..we are bound to vanish. Mark my words.
Thaulopi 3 years ago
lol a wannabe scientist?if hoaglands that then what are u?makes u not quallified to rubbish him.what an ignorant person u r even if we are an accidnet (im sure u wer to ur parents) then in the vastness of the universe ur saying this "accident" couldnt have occured again and again? mark my words ur brain cells vanished long ago oh and for the record walter kronkite thought more of hoagland than a wannabe scientist
clammy666 3 years ago 2