YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

duct tape..that works on ANYTHING...

Gonna take a lot of super glue to put that thing back together

MelC54 1 year ago 2

I think IF there was some way to ACTUALLY raise this ship SAFELY I would think they would have to somehow make a net big enough to put around and underneath the ship that way they could raise it and move it. Not saying its actually possible but if there was anyway possible i would think that would be the safest way. Plus i dont see how it couldnt be possible.

adiosk8r91 1 year ago

its impossible.... the titanic has ben sitting and r=usting so long that if u touch the ship, it will practicly disinigrate

07Blackhawk 1 year ago

@07Blackhawk Yes, and it is split in two pieces at the bottom of the sea

davinp 1 year ago

Thats not the titanic T_T

mithories 2 years ago 2

akshult iut is he used custom colers i think and amed it so its hi out of the water

eyesk8ter 1 year ago

if you raise it, its gonna still sink because there's still that gash and also the water will just enter the gigantic hole where titanic broke in 2.

alexandthomas 2 years ago

Take it up with the piece Atlantic ground with big balloons in it. It will still float.

Abricialio 1 year ago

even if u had raised it that wouldent fix the problem the ship had. the rudder was too small and the ship was too big... it needed a bigger rudder, at lease 5 times the size of the one it orignaly had.

8yearsahead 2 years ago

true, but that would only fix the turning radius. the real problem was the hull and expansion joints(allowed the hull to move as the ship moved). The bulkheads didnt go to the top decks of the ship so water flooded more as the ship sank. Overall it was poor design that sank the ship not the rudder, though a slightly larger rudder would have let the ship turn faster to miss the iceberg.

Duslle5555 2 years ago

@8yearsahead the rudder wasnt to big

coinop24 1 year ago

it was too small.

8yearsahead 1 year ago

this isnt a titanic

wrecic 2 years ago

2 questions

1:why is it so high up in the water?

2:what game is that?

galloway6204 2 years ago

it would be cool if they could raise it but its been so long that if they tried it would fall apart even more. and Russellhart is right it would be very disrespectfull to everyone who died.

krazyknoxy 2 years ago

Nice looking scene!

MetaverseOne 2 years ago

how come is has yellow funnels its not britannic

villarock9 2 years ago 2

Britannic never had yellow funnels. When it was first built for passenger/cargo use, it would have had the orange funnels w/black band at the top. Britannic never carried a paying passenger as it was pressed into wartime hospital ship service for the Royal Navy & was painted white.

tchapman1977 2 years ago

@tchapman1977 thats titanic you were right about the funnels tho

coinop24 1 year ago

The only ship that didn't sink during the times of Lusitania, Britannic, Titanic etc was the Olympic. It hit a navy ship and survived the collision. It really pissed me off, just cos noone wanted to buy it, they stripped it for parts how stupid.

pilotette 2 years ago

But Lusitania was A Cunard Liner not White Star Line

silverbeatles61 2 years ago

i am sure they will be a bit more carefull with the full speed and going faster every time and that way they wont hit any iceberg

xpxdzz 2 years ago

but what if it hit another iceburg??!!

8alex55 3 years ago

the same thing would of happened. If the Titanic had even hit it dead on (straight) it would of survived

pilotette 2 years ago 2

they should remake the titanic it be so fun to go on

roseangel8 3 years ago 4

it would be fun to put an iceberg in front of it =3

freak60763 2 years ago

It woudl be a hated monument on this earth the ship id a grave yard it would be very disrespectfull to all those who died those many eyars ago

Russellhart2006 2 years ago

I think they should remake it.. why don't they? they could make so much money out of it!

skullzcrusher 3 years ago

it would cost an estimated 495 million to build again. why not completely restore pompeii instead, it would only cost 300 mil and pompeii is of greater cultural significance.

hateterrorists 3 years ago

so what inflation does do that you know but still!

give me the money and i will rebuild it!

eleventhdr 2 years ago

jeffhardyfanallway i think its sherlock not surelock so u missed being cool and stuff...

warsoldier12345 3 years ago

thats before it sank

radiocontrolexpert 3 years ago

Well if .... Well it was if because they did a 99 scale model of it for the movie TITANIC so lol

csyicker 3 years ago

what do u mean 99 scale are you saying the real titnic is bigger than the titanic in the movie ???

p.s. i wouldnt mind going on the titanic if it came back ^_^ it would be kind of educational and cool to ride on it lol

jsantana102 3 years ago

In the movie, in order to save money, the only built half of the hull, removed most of the forecastle deck, and took 3 slices of 20' out of the ship near the forward and aft expansion joints. This resulted in a ship roughly 822.5' long, versus the Titanic's 882.5'.

darthsentinel 3 years ago

In order to save money, in the film they shortened the ship down. They only built the port side of the hull, removed most of the forecastle deck, and took out 3 slices of 20' around the fore and aft expansion joints. This left them a ship roughly 822.5' long, versus the Titanic's 882.5' long.

darthsentinel 3 years ago

the 1997 movie was more expensive than ship itself by 13% extra cost.

murnavid 3 years ago

The exterior sets for the ship in the 1997 movie were built almost to scale pretty much from the waterline up in a tank. It wasn't an actual ship. The bottom of the hull you see when the stern lifts out of the water was CGI to cut down on expense & to allow the set to be put on a gimbol to so that it could tilt & break in half.

tchapman1977 2 years ago