I want to support my family, I dont know why but as a male I just have this urge to work for my family, Its all I live for. If that purpose was taken away from me, or threatened by the person I work for. I dont know how I could cope. What good would I be as a father? Your vision scares me, I could only hope it doesnt lead to a world of solo independent mums who belittle their male counterparts. Because we're equals, and as a male, if we're not loving, we're fighting
@WorldCittadinanza ... one thing to remember. Many rich women are lonely ... very lonely. They would love to find male companionship and to feel lovely. Rich women do not necessarily care about a man's money (she has her own). She does want a man to be able to take care of himself financially though. And what they DO care about is that a man has confidence, is interesting and interested, and takes good care of himself ... and her ... emotionally. Think about it ... and good luck.
Interesting topic. I have little drive for romantic love anymore. Maybe it's age and hormones! Comparing how I used to quest for love and my experience of love now, I can see that my former relationship to love was a sickness. I do not believe that love is blind. Love simply gives me inspiration to gain a higher level of tolerance and kindness. Love is my greatest teacher and pathway to evolution. I want my love to thrive ... love is not here to meet my needs. This is my constant lesson.
Men and women need each other, they complete each other. That's why when they get together we say "they are one". What would happen if we seperate?, that's when the humanity will be in crisis and the human race will cease! Science can't explain the feeling of pain other than it being it a stmiulant-receptor response, why are we trying to explain love with a different approach. She keeps on suggesting love is not a feeling but an "obsession". Yes, lust can become an obsession but not true love!
"There's many more male geniuses in the world and there's also many more male idiots in the world", "when the male brain works well, it works extremely well"...she's really bias, it looks as if her study is to suggest that love is only one-sided and male are female worshippers in a way. Love happens from both side. Men and women are equal, their mental and physical abilities might be different but we are both social animals. We respond in different ways, yet we feel and cry etc including men.
I was looking for some chemistry videos when I ended up watching this on TED. I was surprised that she said "men and women are not alike", which is true but they are ofcourse equal human beings but whenshe sort of drifts away from that statement to say women are more powerful then men and how they've been leaders and stuff, it suggests to me that she believes in empowerment of women but not in a good way but as in to kick ass.
THIS BITCH IS DUMB the world is impossibly over 5000 years old. the sun would of been so big 1 million years ago it would of incerated earth. the suns shrinks as time goes on and the moon moves away from the earth. a million years ago the moon and earth would of been almost touch. the sun would be burnign anything alive. and the gravity on earth would be so strong by now it wouldnt be bareable to live so fuck darwin. history IS WRONG
@tml4873 ohhhhh so because someone else who writes books says its true it must be so ! noone fucking knows the truth. think about it, look up online about a young earth and the sings of it, maybe YOU should stop being ignorant and nieve and read something outside of your schools, you really trust the same people who caused 9/11 to give you proper historical information ? yes im talking about your government. the ones who hide true knoweledge and brainwash us slaves into believe a false history
@fight2befree420 You know what the difference is between the Young Earth books and science? Young Earth does indeed have an agenda, much like the fictional government you are supposing is ruling your country, whereas science has no agenda except finding out the truth, and is a self-correcting system in that it requires objective verification of any finds that are made. So basically, you might wanna switch your position with the scientific one, and then your statement might make sense.
@jursle science is alll just fucking hopes and dreams you really cant prove anything noone knows forsure, so for you to say that science is more correct your just following the conformist way of thinking you brainwashed spawn of the nwo, open your mind and realize how impossible science is. science is for people without imagination and there own thoughts your just trying to rationalize everything because your to affraid to know the truth and expand your brain past the so called known boundries
@fight2befree420 Philosophically, you're right. We can't prove the existence of anything besides ourselves, and even that we can only do to ourselves. However, assumig the universe is actually real, science is our best way of understandng it
"Science is for people without imagination"? Do you realize how much imagination it takes just to think of black holes, neutron stars, gammaray bursts, let alone find them? It doesn't take imagination in the sense that noone made it up, yes, but that's good!
@jursle in a sense isnt everything philisophy, even science cant explain itself, take quantum physics. a electron will take one position when being observed but when noone is looking it is in a wave of potentiality, it exsists in more then one place at one time until you look at it and it chooses a set place, your mind does that to everything we see anyways, molecules and protons and electrons are in super position and wave functions until we decide what we think is real.
@fight2befree420 I must agree with you that quantum physics is, as of now, very complicated and unclear. we don't yet know what is causing particles to behave like that. However, with research, we may find out. In a way, everything is indeed philosophy, because all sciences originated in hpilosophy., This does however not mean you can just take any philosopher's thoughts and claim them as truth. And it sure as hell doesn't mean you should believe in bullshit like Young Earth or 9/11 conspiracies
@jursle consperecies? haha george bush went to court over 9/11 everyone knows that it was orchastrated by the american government, the jets were the only planes able to fly under remote control, the pentagon was to small of a whole to be a jet and passing cars would of been blown off the highway due to wind force, flight 73 disintigrated into nothing? have you seen a plane crash. there is debris. all the money everyone earned of insurance and promoting the war on terror. think about it.
@fight2befree420 Right, and if it's so blatantly obvious, why doesn't everybody agree with you? Now, admittedly, Bush was a total retard who probably didn't care about 9/11, but if he'd wanted to start the war on terrorism they could have done so by destroying a far less important target. But all that shit aside, science > random 2000 year old book.
@jursle YOUR IGNORING THE FACTS. go read and do years of research on the real facts about it then you can tell me whats up. read the documents i have. you know nothing. you know what youve been told by the news and tv your brainwashed and lied to why dont you stop being so nieve think about how much the government has to gain from doing that. and why all the government were told not to fly on those days. and why the pilots are still alive. and why theres mountains of supporting evidence
@fight2befree420 I really don't give a shit about 9/11. Seriously. It was only an example of the stupid shit you believe in.
My problem is a lot more that you don't trust science than that you don't trust the media. You not only believe in 9/11 conspiracies, but, far worse than that, you believe in a Young Earth, so an Earth that is only 6000 years old. Apart from the obvious facts about the Earth's age, the universe's age and our sun's age, the first humans lived 8000 years ago.
@jursle what ever your obviously to ignorant and brainwashed to change your stubborn point of view. go live a lie. when the day that you relize youve been lied to all your life. think of me. have a nice life you money earning materialistic nieve piece of celery.
@fight2befree420 No, i'm too reliant on proof to change my mind. Prove to me that Young Earth shit is true, I'll change my mind. I will say that I haven't actively researched 9/11, though it does seem unlikely to me that Bush went to court without anybody knowing.
Finally, did you seriously insult me by calling me a piece of celery? Seriously? WTF? Oh, and I don't really earn any money at all, I'm a student.
@jursle lol exactly you havnt done the years and years of research and back checking and referance searching to find the shit out i have about the government and the world. one day soon you will see . veeryy soon things will change and i hope your ready. just dont be suprised. im tryin to warn people. im being proven right again and again so , i hope your not to ignorant to not keep a back up plan in your head for when shit hits the fan
@jursle its not just america you fool. the world is run by a higher set of people then the government. 9/11 lying to you about young earth, all of it is apart of the same plan from the same people. thats fine though im trying to open peoples minds but your onviously to brainwashed and afraid to learn the truth about how the world actually works, so keep thinkin you know whats going on. but youll know soon. enjoy what you have for now and when your unprepared and confused ill be ready and lawlin
@fight2befree420 gravity decreases 25,000** years ago it would of been to strong to live on. there would be no pressure on fossill fuels still, saturns rings would of been destroyed by comets by now. there would be less salt in the ocean, and more helium in the atmosphere. there is to many things that counter the stupid idea of a billion year old planet. the univers hasnt been the same for a billion years and theres no way the earth would of survived till this day. dont be ignorant.
@Wiggyify Anthropology is better. It does not attempt to put a century's old western male perspective and apply that to everyone of all cultures around the world to explain their behavior.
I skimmed through her book "Why We Love" in 2005. It wasn't until recently that I read it more thoroughly (and I had never seen this footage prior to putting together my little piece).
@cheeseaura the point is that you need BOTH. and how is it that if you are providing 60% of the food source... if you make that 100% because their is no longer meat or men to fetch it... how are you starving?
@cheeseaura i know you removed your comment, but: i disagree. her argument, in fact the only reason she mentioned either of these things, was to illustrate her point: women are *RE* entering the workforce & that the more women contribute economically the more equal the society tends to be. i dont think that any of this has anything to do with nurtrition. and why is it that you seem to believe that only men can be hunters? dont think women can bring home the bacon??
@gizmokeeper By all means, women can bring home the bacon. However, I would argue that since women have been put into direct competition with men since the industrial revolution that equality has been thrown to the wind and that it's become a free for all. The biggest victim in the gender war is fatherhood, which has serious and negative complications for society as a whole.
It's been awhile since I posted my first comment, so I didn't remember what was in the video or expect a necro reply.
These statistics are skewed. How can she say romantic love is on the rise with sexuality in media, conversation, and the minds of young people overlapses any desire for companionship? Divorce rates wouldn't be 40 to 50% if romantic love was on the rise.
@JimProfitCat How does the divorce rate contradict the idea that romantic love is on the rise? The divorce rate rising could also indicate that people are getting divorced because they are seeking romantic love after having lost it in their current marriage. Romantic love isn't necessarily an eternal concept, except in some fantasy world of Cinderella and pumpkins. Every individual i know who is single and honest is longing for a partner (or pet) as our evolutionary mammalian brain demands it.
@JimProfitCat I do not agree. Divorce rates are high because people rush into marriage to quickly marriage requires much more than love. For instance my sister became engaged after knowing her partner for three months and that is quite common these days and so they quickly did divorce. I do believe that romantic love is on the rise, especially because of the negative influences of this world. It makes all woman seem the same, but then you find someone who seems to defy that.
Mistake me if I'm wrong but is she suggesting that humans have been around for "million and million of years"? I was under the assumption that the most likely estimate was between 125,000-250,000 years.
@perfectack LOL, scientific studies have shown that the dopamine patterns are similar and that lovers become "addicted" to one another in a way that is EXTREMELY similar, at least on a physiological level, to cocaine addiction.
If you think you can quantify love with scientific garbage you clearly have never experienced it properly. So I suggest you stop dicking around and quoting experiments you most likely googled just to have some snide remark to leave on an appauling vid where some bat claims she understands love on a scientific level, and get out there and make your own damn opinion. The addiction to something like cocaine is blind and uncaring love is nothing like that I can assure you.
I apologize, I did come off as an imbecile. I didn't mean to apply blind reductionism to love. In this case, the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.
I read the book How to Think Like Leonardo Da Vinci and it discussed the need for the virtue of Arte/Scienza or the balance between art and science, logic and passion. I think that you can both engage and disengage meaning, virtue and passion as needed. In this case, the woman we disengaged from all of these, I agree.
But at times, pure logic without meaning, without any feeling whatsoever can be useful. However, all sorts of artists, poets and musicians have compared love to a cocaine rush, but rather than self-destruction one achieves both euphoria and well being, but more importantly, a profound depth of meaning in life that truly cannot be matched by anything else in this life.
In other words, I think science and art, logic and passion complement one another and do not necessarily have to be mutually exclusive. In fact, the key to genius may in fact be a full realization of the strength and power of both.
Well eh good work there you seem to have your head in the right place unlike most twats on youtube. Can I say this though, simply because poets and musicians have compared love to a cocaine rush doesnt make them right. It more so highlights their inability to fully express themselves and in turn are forced to relate to something rather base in a rather squalid attempt to convey their feelings. Cocaine is something man made....love is not. Im no expert on this, however I make my own conclusions
I'm interested on your take on the cocaine arguement. I think Helen was just expressing our need to love and withdraw that follows from detachment. I've seen enough people drive themselves crazy about breakups. Further more her cocaine logic is not that the love and the use of cocaine are perfectly equivalent but that it stimulates the same fulfillment. BTW bro calm down. I think I could make sense of what she is saying, and I would be happy to hear your rebutle if you think its more credible.
@nowandforever117 Last time I checked I didn't take orders from self righteous prats and don't call me your "bro" its unsettling. If you actually experienced love and I asked you "So nowandforever117 would you agree that snorting cocaine and being in love both surmount to the same level of "fulfillment"?". For your sake Ill take it that you aren't a complete tard to which I hypothesise your answer would be "no". But go snort cocaine or pretend you know what love is for all I care.....
self righteous prats=people who don't totally agree with you? Nice logic... Also I would like to know why you think you know what your talking about.... Got a degree? Or are you just in possession of an opinion...?
@nowandforever117 I was unaware whether you agreed with me or not so don't delude yourself thinking I care what you think, you are just another youtube idiot to me." I would like to know why you think you know what your talking about...Got a degree?", I do not disclose information when demanded by a complete stranger who shows little higher cognitive functioning than a lemming and for your information I do possess a BSc in Computer Science. Btw learn the difference between "your" and "you're"
@perfectack its called academics. The formal exchange of knowledge that relies solely on the honesty of those who are being credited. You should of learned that in your english classes in college. The fact that she is a well known doctor of psychology speaks well against your computer BSc degree.... and .. burn..
@nowandforever117 What? it's almost been 2 months!! It took you that long to come up with such a waffle riddled reply that fancifully dances around what you are trying to say without actually saying it. Also don't talk down to others about english when you can't even use it "you should HAVE learned that" not "of" you illiterate douché. Also unlike you I have a degree so I think you are more applicable to the "burn" comment :P enjoy being a stupid illiterate kid who faps to some old bint :P
a world without love would be no world at all, seeing as how love = reproduction. It would also be a world of peace, as love leads to rivalry and frustration.
Wait so when men cheat it's "Adulterous" but when females cheat it's sexually liberating? This is the dialect that gives uneducated people the misconception that feminists are in fact one sided. Please revise your language dear.
Preaching inequality in gender is not preaching gender equality. She is not a feminist. She is a scientific thinker concerned with the truth. Yes there are more male geniuses and male screw ups in this world than there are female screw ups or geniuses. We don't need a joke to show the remnants and the ongoings of a male dominated world. Women have yet to fully demonstrate their ability in this world. Do I think they will do a better job than men. Yes. Have they proven enough. No.
I could not agree more, Margret Thatcher did an outstanding job of destroying indusrty, taking peoples jobs and homes, crushing the voice of the hard working man or WOMAN by destroying workers unions. Promoting "greed is good" so the rich got richer and the poor got what they deserved.
Do I think they will do a better job than men. Yes. Have they proven enough. More than enough thank you!
women speak better than men? than aristotle? than plato? than einstein? than dirac? than jfk? than kant? than rousseau? montaigne? montesqieu? diderot? etc., etc., hmmmm
@pikiwiki , you are truly picky...giving those examples. You forget to give a cultural context and historical background, which are crucial! Women had no chance to get even some education, not to mention education all those man got. As Ms Fisher said woman had never been in the position before, so educated and capable.
The problem, as I see it, with scientific analysis of "Love" is that science uses the presumption that a person is just a complex of parts and acts which can be quantified and defined. That is true,TO A POINT. But to a Christian, more essentially, a person is a spirit with self awareness which can freely will, think and choose, can never die and has a divine spark within, that connects to and grows spiritually via Graceful Open-Heated Love towards the Godhead through the person of Jesus Christ.
What a pity to have annoyed you to the point of giving me an order. I just feel it appropriate to highlight to you that I prefaced my comment in the very first sentence with "as I see it" . So if you had any brains you would have replied analytically on my points.
There is no analysis when there is no evidence. Back you go. You cannot be reasoned with. If I had 1 piece if evidence that really flew about a god I would be in the pulpit with you. Now fuck off.
That's quite a strong reaction. Wonder where those feelings originate. Feel free to return with an intelligent constructive debate based on my initial comment anytime. May Jesus grace you.
I don't share her views about anti-depressants or at least the one I have taken-seroxat also called peroxatine. A selective seratonin reuptake inhibitor. My experience is that about 12-18 hours after taking it I feel very pleasantly horny. I explain as follows-the drug allows me to stop wasting emotional (and sexual?) enerygy on my mental issues and as a result my sexual/emotional energy builds up and so 12-18 hours later I feel happily horny.. Of course if I had a fulfilling social life I would
what a very interesting and thought provoking video. Love is what should make the world go around, not war, religion or money. If we made more love and less war we would all be a lot happier.
this is a futile attempt to profess upon a subject which has no real definition. what is romantic love because from my point of view love has no parallels with romanticism. romantic love is simply a self imposed illusion to disguise the harsh reality that we are in hell, nature is unforgiving, sentient life is uggly and predictable and the tangible universe is a mass of paradoxical contradictions. romance is a heavy smothering act of rape that taints the only truly beautiful thing we have.
You can also distract yourself from the unbearable aspects of your life by buying a sports car . So to you, romantic love is paralleled with a Porche. I think I prefer Fisher's "futile attempt" to take interest in why we feel love the way we do then your extremely subjective, potentially cliched and darn right pathetic excuse for edgy "dead poets society"-esque horse shit.
@icantstopdoingthis hello. could you explain the romantic love and porche comment. i find the rest of your rant a little sweeping and with no real ligitimacy cliched you might say.. before the child like literary posturing continues i suggest engaging in convo. pottentialy cliched!!!!?? with 6 billion people in the world thats a given. subjective yes but extremely thats an exageration. my personal experiences are not to be taken lightly and i could expand upon what i had previousl ywrote.
haha, but of course. I'm not sure i said i was "the internet superior" but i take offense to people who dont look at arguments for their merits and grant equal value to everything they read because they confuse the right to an opinion with a right to be listened to or a right not to be criticised. the latter two are, obviously, absurd.
@PrivateSchoolBoy right on dude but its time to giv it a rest youl burst a blood vesel there may be differing opinions on this subject but sind some time for some very un romantic sagginfg its good for you end of.
Erm..Isn't she a sexist, she always argues against men in the video and tells all the advantages about women and nothing about men....she doesn't make sense anyway....
Ok then - Protein ("to hold first place") Citation from Wiki: #Biological Value# Wheat: 41 Beef: 74.3 #Protein content (% of dry matter)# Banana 5.14 Beef 32.76 Raisin, seedless 3.88 Cauliflower, cooked 27.34 Peas, black eyed, frozen 27.00 Carrots, cooked 6.46 From this information you cannot say women provided 80% of a balanced diet. Bullshit.
and who are you, the fucking justice league? Dont tell me what to do and don't even mention my intellect unless you've got some counter arguments. You clearly only took offence to my remark because i am your superior
So is she atheist?
Jeffrey4004 2 weeks ago
Your video is popular on East Timor (Timor
ronaldromero85 2 weeks ago
Lady reminds me Leonard's mother from The Big Bang Theory.
drak1921 1 month ago
Your video is a favorite on Bogota
ughkane614h 1 month ago
HA! fuckin finally. i've been wondering where big c gets his samples. also i think this whole thing is quite interesting.
drumkidchaos 1 month ago
Have a depressed population or a productive one. Can't have both.
ZahrDalsk 1 month ago
Question...Humans have been around millions of years? How do we know this? just saying.......women rule the skewl. Peace
nahkmong 2 months ago
@nahkmong new fossils show us this nahkmong
nahkmong 2 months ago
@nahkmong I love fossils
nahkmong 2 months ago
00:00:00
MrSEOKYOUN 5 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Shut the fuck up, cunt, get your ass in the kitchen and make me a sandwich
YouDontKnowMe071 5 months ago
I want to support my family, I dont know why but as a male I just have this urge to work for my family, Its all I live for. If that purpose was taken away from me, or threatened by the person I work for. I dont know how I could cope. What good would I be as a father? Your vision scares me, I could only hope it doesnt lead to a world of solo independent mums who belittle their male counterparts. Because we're equals, and as a male, if we're not loving, we're fighting
angelart2011 6 months ago
I'm thinking of him as I listen to this...
MissLoveTantei91 6 months ago
@WorldCittadinanza ... one thing to remember. Many rich women are lonely ... very lonely. They would love to find male companionship and to feel lovely. Rich women do not necessarily care about a man's money (she has her own). She does want a man to be able to take care of himself financially though. And what they DO care about is that a man has confidence, is interesting and interested, and takes good care of himself ... and her ... emotionally. Think about it ... and good luck.
JenseyGo 7 months ago
Oh yea, and I saw that ending coming a mile away. Of COURSE she would fall for the rickshaw driver!!! LOL
JenseyGo 7 months ago
Interesting topic. I have little drive for romantic love anymore. Maybe it's age and hormones! Comparing how I used to quest for love and my experience of love now, I can see that my former relationship to love was a sickness. I do not believe that love is blind. Love simply gives me inspiration to gain a higher level of tolerance and kindness. Love is my greatest teacher and pathway to evolution. I want my love to thrive ... love is not here to meet my needs. This is my constant lesson.
JenseyGo 7 months ago
im so afraid im going to die alone.
TripoVision 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@WorldCittadinanza Yeah, life's not fair.. But keep working on whatever you can, to improve yourself.. and it gets better.
benntownsend 7 months ago
@WorldCittadinanza Yeah, life's not fair.. But keep working on whatever you can, to improve yourself.. and it gets better.
benntownsend 7 months ago
I like the idea of us being like a pair of feet! We need each other to walk forward...:-)
MaeveTV 8 months ago
Comment removed
aatayyab 8 months ago
Men and women need each other, they complete each other. That's why when they get together we say "they are one". What would happen if we seperate?, that's when the humanity will be in crisis and the human race will cease! Science can't explain the feeling of pain other than it being it a stmiulant-receptor response, why are we trying to explain love with a different approach. She keeps on suggesting love is not a feeling but an "obsession". Yes, lust can become an obsession but not true love!
United1ification 10 months ago
"There's many more male geniuses in the world and there's also many more male idiots in the world", "when the male brain works well, it works extremely well"...she's really bias, it looks as if her study is to suggest that love is only one-sided and male are female worshippers in a way. Love happens from both side. Men and women are equal, their mental and physical abilities might be different but we are both social animals. We respond in different ways, yet we feel and cry etc including men.
United1ification 10 months ago
I was looking for some chemistry videos when I ended up watching this on TED. I was surprised that she said "men and women are not alike", which is true but they are ofcourse equal human beings but whenshe sort of drifts away from that statement to say women are more powerful then men and how they've been leaders and stuff, it suggests to me that she believes in empowerment of women but not in a good way but as in to kick ass.
United1ification 10 months ago
Comment removed
narcomanel 11 months ago
:D
afordian 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is a good day, try to find good Latino girl rockmycity.info
surangagayan99 1 year ago
this bitch doesn't know what the fuck she's talking about.
bubs7569 1 year ago
@bubs7569 Yeah, she totally doesn't have an academic education and years upon years of research to back her claims.......
jursle 1 year ago
nice. i totally believe she can predict the next 10,000 years.
bubs7569 1 year ago
THIS BITCH IS DUMB the world is impossibly over 5000 years old. the sun would of been so big 1 million years ago it would of incerated earth. the suns shrinks as time goes on and the moon moves away from the earth. a million years ago the moon and earth would of been almost touch. the sun would be burnign anything alive. and the gravity on earth would be so strong by now it wouldnt be bareable to live so fuck darwin. history IS WRONG
fight2befree420 1 year ago
@fight2befree420 Please check yourself into the nearest mental sanitarium. Alternatively, read some science books.
tml4873 1 year ago 4
@tml4873 ohhhhh so because someone else who writes books says its true it must be so ! noone fucking knows the truth. think about it, look up online about a young earth and the sings of it, maybe YOU should stop being ignorant and nieve and read something outside of your schools, you really trust the same people who caused 9/11 to give you proper historical information ? yes im talking about your government. the ones who hide true knoweledge and brainwash us slaves into believe a false history
fight2befree420 1 year ago
@fight2befree420 Like I said, check yourself into the nearest insane asylum. The second option is no longer feasible.
tml4873 1 year ago
@fight2befree420 You know what the difference is between the Young Earth books and science? Young Earth does indeed have an agenda, much like the fictional government you are supposing is ruling your country, whereas science has no agenda except finding out the truth, and is a self-correcting system in that it requires objective verification of any finds that are made. So basically, you might wanna switch your position with the scientific one, and then your statement might make sense.
jursle 1 year ago
@jursle science is alll just fucking hopes and dreams you really cant prove anything noone knows forsure, so for you to say that science is more correct your just following the conformist way of thinking you brainwashed spawn of the nwo, open your mind and realize how impossible science is. science is for people without imagination and there own thoughts your just trying to rationalize everything because your to affraid to know the truth and expand your brain past the so called known boundries
fight2befree420 1 year ago
@fight2befree420 Philosophically, you're right. We can't prove the existence of anything besides ourselves, and even that we can only do to ourselves. However, assumig the universe is actually real, science is our best way of understandng it
"Science is for people without imagination"? Do you realize how much imagination it takes just to think of black holes, neutron stars, gammaray bursts, let alone find them? It doesn't take imagination in the sense that noone made it up, yes, but that's good!
jursle 1 year ago
@jursle in a sense isnt everything philisophy, even science cant explain itself, take quantum physics. a electron will take one position when being observed but when noone is looking it is in a wave of potentiality, it exsists in more then one place at one time until you look at it and it chooses a set place, your mind does that to everything we see anyways, molecules and protons and electrons are in super position and wave functions until we decide what we think is real.
fight2befree420 1 year ago
@fight2befree420 I must agree with you that quantum physics is, as of now, very complicated and unclear. we don't yet know what is causing particles to behave like that. However, with research, we may find out. In a way, everything is indeed philosophy, because all sciences originated in hpilosophy., This does however not mean you can just take any philosopher's thoughts and claim them as truth. And it sure as hell doesn't mean you should believe in bullshit like Young Earth or 9/11 conspiracies
jursle 1 year ago
@jursle consperecies? haha george bush went to court over 9/11 everyone knows that it was orchastrated by the american government, the jets were the only planes able to fly under remote control, the pentagon was to small of a whole to be a jet and passing cars would of been blown off the highway due to wind force, flight 73 disintigrated into nothing? have you seen a plane crash. there is debris. all the money everyone earned of insurance and promoting the war on terror. think about it.
fight2befree420 1 year ago
@fight2befree420 Right, and if it's so blatantly obvious, why doesn't everybody agree with you? Now, admittedly, Bush was a total retard who probably didn't care about 9/11, but if he'd wanted to start the war on terrorism they could have done so by destroying a far less important target. But all that shit aside, science > random 2000 year old book.
jursle 1 year ago
@jursle YOUR IGNORING THE FACTS. go read and do years of research on the real facts about it then you can tell me whats up. read the documents i have. you know nothing. you know what youve been told by the news and tv your brainwashed and lied to why dont you stop being so nieve think about how much the government has to gain from doing that. and why all the government were told not to fly on those days. and why the pilots are still alive. and why theres mountains of supporting evidence
fight2befree420 1 year ago
@fight2befree420 I really don't give a shit about 9/11. Seriously. It was only an example of the stupid shit you believe in.
My problem is a lot more that you don't trust science than that you don't trust the media. You not only believe in 9/11 conspiracies, but, far worse than that, you believe in a Young Earth, so an Earth that is only 6000 years old. Apart from the obvious facts about the Earth's age, the universe's age and our sun's age, the first humans lived 8000 years ago.
jursle 1 year ago
@jursle what ever your obviously to ignorant and brainwashed to change your stubborn point of view. go live a lie. when the day that you relize youve been lied to all your life. think of me. have a nice life you money earning materialistic nieve piece of celery.
fight2befree420 1 year ago
@fight2befree420 No, i'm too reliant on proof to change my mind. Prove to me that Young Earth shit is true, I'll change my mind. I will say that I haven't actively researched 9/11, though it does seem unlikely to me that Bush went to court without anybody knowing.
Finally, did you seriously insult me by calling me a piece of celery? Seriously? WTF? Oh, and I don't really earn any money at all, I'm a student.
jursle 1 year ago
@jursle lol exactly you havnt done the years and years of research and back checking and referance searching to find the shit out i have about the government and the world. one day soon you will see . veeryy soon things will change and i hope your ready. just dont be suprised. im tryin to warn people. im being proven right again and again so , i hope your not to ignorant to not keep a back up plan in your head for when shit hits the fan
fight2befree420 1 year ago
@fight2befree420 Again, I don't give a shit about 9/11. I don't live in the US, if shit happens, I can be safe in 2 hours.
Apart from that, if you have indeed done years of research, submit it to the scientific community, they'll check it for you.
Finally, the only thing I wanted to discuss with you was the Young earth bullshit.
jursle 1 year ago
@jursle its not just america you fool. the world is run by a higher set of people then the government. 9/11 lying to you about young earth, all of it is apart of the same plan from the same people. thats fine though im trying to open peoples minds but your onviously to brainwashed and afraid to learn the truth about how the world actually works, so keep thinkin you know whats going on. but youll know soon. enjoy what you have for now and when your unprepared and confused ill be ready and lawlin
fight2befree420 1 year ago
@fight2befree420 If you actually have proofs for these claims, send them to a scientific paper. Oh, and learn to spell.
jursle 1 year ago
@jursle LOL you piece of celery, ooooOooOOoh you got buuuUUUuUUUuUUuuRRrRrRRrrrrRRnnned!
I am going to call everyone who disagrees with me a piece of celery from now on.
noisepuppet 1 year ago
Comment removed
narcomanel 11 months ago
@tml4873 Successful troll is successful.
narcomanel 11 months ago
@tml4873
dam !! now i have to search for fight2befree420's comment
learning112233 5 months ago 3
@fight2befree420 gravity decreases 25,000** years ago it would of been to strong to live on. there would be no pressure on fossill fuels still, saturns rings would of been destroyed by comets by now. there would be less salt in the ocean, and more helium in the atmosphere. there is to many things that counter the stupid idea of a billion year old planet. the univers hasnt been the same for a billion years and theres no way the earth would of survived till this day. dont be ignorant.
fight2befree420 1 year ago
I love anthropology. This was a really interesting lecture.
xhappyrainbow 1 year ago
So that's why i like being on the computer so often....
when I masturbate to porn, i get a spike of dopamine and fall in love.
heeh2 1 year ago
Am I deceived or this bitch is feminist ?
inv1e 1 year ago
Helen Fisher is spot on at 20:35 about 'Why it is that you fall in love with one person rather than another'.
I fell very deeply in love with a prof the first time I saw her as a student.
- I was new in town, it was the first day at university and everything was very exciting to me (high dopamin level)
- I didn't knew her before (mystery)(high dopamin level)
- She matched traits of my childhood (similar looks)
- I was sitting randomly very near to her, we had direct eye contact (proximity)
moremost 1 year ago 10
@moremost -- and how did it end ??
zaliwins 1 year ago
psychology is just waay too cool. anthropology is interesting, but not like psychology
Wiggyify 1 year ago
@Wiggyify Anthropology is better. It does not attempt to put a century's old western male perspective and apply that to everyone of all cultures around the world to explain their behavior.
gizmokeeper 1 year ago
Fuck you, evolution. This is way obsolete. Because it increases the chances of having kids still feel bad even if you don't want them?
Ridiculous.
LeMegasandwich 1 year ago
I skimmed through her book "Why We Love" in 2005. It wasn't until recently that I read it more thoroughly (and I had never seen this footage prior to putting together my little piece).
PeeGeeBeeDee 1 year ago
Retarded.
Women may have brought 60% of the food, but if you're not getting any meat to back it up, you're starving.
cheeseaura 1 year ago
@cheeseaura the point is that you need BOTH. and how is it that if you are providing 60% of the food source... if you make that 100% because their is no longer meat or men to fetch it... how are you starving?
gizmokeeper 1 year ago
Comment removed
cheeseaura 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gizmokeeper Your argument is based on percentages, my argument is based on nutritional needs/value. You're missing the point entirely.
cheeseaura 1 year ago
Comment removed
gizmokeeper 1 year ago
@cheeseaura i know you removed your comment, but: i disagree. her argument, in fact the only reason she mentioned either of these things, was to illustrate her point: women are *RE* entering the workforce & that the more women contribute economically the more equal the society tends to be. i dont think that any of this has anything to do with nurtrition. and why is it that you seem to believe that only men can be hunters? dont think women can bring home the bacon??
gizmokeeper 1 year ago
@gizmokeeper By all means, women can bring home the bacon. However, I would argue that since women have been put into direct competition with men since the industrial revolution that equality has been thrown to the wind and that it's become a free for all. The biggest victim in the gender war is fatherhood, which has serious and negative complications for society as a whole.
It's been awhile since I posted my first comment, so I didn't remember what was in the video or expect a necro reply.
cheeseaura 1 year ago
8:38 lol
she says job fart.
DSD1v57BG32 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fuck helen in the eye
perfectack 1 year ago
Romantic Love is on the rise. because people in marriages have romatic love outside of their marriage.
Romance = short term... its fantasy...
BOWENSblog 1 year ago
@BOWENSblog Couldn't have said it better.
slwLwisen00 1 year ago
this is bullshit
lukyrUshY 1 year ago
thanks.
TheSecretDiary 1 year ago
These statistics are skewed. How can she say romantic love is on the rise with sexuality in media, conversation, and the minds of young people overlapses any desire for companionship? Divorce rates wouldn't be 40 to 50% if romantic love was on the rise.
JimProfitCat 1 year ago
@JimProfitCat How does the divorce rate contradict the idea that romantic love is on the rise? The divorce rate rising could also indicate that people are getting divorced because they are seeking romantic love after having lost it in their current marriage. Romantic love isn't necessarily an eternal concept, except in some fantasy world of Cinderella and pumpkins. Every individual i know who is single and honest is longing for a partner (or pet) as our evolutionary mammalian brain demands it.
WeLoveCatsAndDogs 1 year ago
@JimProfitCat I do not agree. Divorce rates are high because people rush into marriage to quickly marriage requires much more than love. For instance my sister became engaged after knowing her partner for three months and that is quite common these days and so they quickly did divorce. I do believe that romantic love is on the rise, especially because of the negative influences of this world. It makes all woman seem the same, but then you find someone who seems to defy that.
OrderOfTheAzureSky 1 year ago
Mistake me if I'm wrong but is she suggesting that humans have been around for "million and million of years"? I was under the assumption that the most likely estimate was between 125,000-250,000 years.
mugenjin205 1 year ago
Someone that compares love with the "rush of cocaine" has other issues.....
perfectack 1 year ago
@perfectack LOL, scientific studies have shown that the dopamine patterns are similar and that lovers become "addicted" to one another in a way that is EXTREMELY similar, at least on a physiological level, to cocaine addiction.
RosenzweigBenjamin2 1 year ago
If you think you can quantify love with scientific garbage you clearly have never experienced it properly. So I suggest you stop dicking around and quoting experiments you most likely googled just to have some snide remark to leave on an appauling vid where some bat claims she understands love on a scientific level, and get out there and make your own damn opinion. The addiction to something like cocaine is blind and uncaring love is nothing like that I can assure you.
perfectack 1 year ago
I apologize, I did come off as an imbecile. I didn't mean to apply blind reductionism to love. In this case, the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.
I read the book How to Think Like Leonardo Da Vinci and it discussed the need for the virtue of Arte/Scienza or the balance between art and science, logic and passion. I think that you can both engage and disengage meaning, virtue and passion as needed. In this case, the woman we disengaged from all of these, I agree.
RosenzweigBenjamin2 1 year ago
But at times, pure logic without meaning, without any feeling whatsoever can be useful. However, all sorts of artists, poets and musicians have compared love to a cocaine rush, but rather than self-destruction one achieves both euphoria and well being, but more importantly, a profound depth of meaning in life that truly cannot be matched by anything else in this life.
RosenzweigBenjamin2 1 year ago
In other words, I think science and art, logic and passion complement one another and do not necessarily have to be mutually exclusive. In fact, the key to genius may in fact be a full realization of the strength and power of both.
RosenzweigBenjamin2 1 year ago
Well eh good work there you seem to have your head in the right place unlike most twats on youtube. Can I say this though, simply because poets and musicians have compared love to a cocaine rush doesnt make them right. It more so highlights their inability to fully express themselves and in turn are forced to relate to something rather base in a rather squalid attempt to convey their feelings. Cocaine is something man made....love is not. Im no expert on this, however I make my own conclusions
perfectack 1 year ago
when u look at the science of it, it's true
farmgirlnicole 1 year ago
@farmgirlnicole When you look at the appauling comment you made it begs the question that maybe you should stick to farming?
If you think Cocaine is the same as love then don't bother telling me I couldn't give a shit.
perfectack 1 year ago
I'm interested on your take on the cocaine arguement. I think Helen was just expressing our need to love and withdraw that follows from detachment. I've seen enough people drive themselves crazy about breakups. Further more her cocaine logic is not that the love and the use of cocaine are perfectly equivalent but that it stimulates the same fulfillment. BTW bro calm down. I think I could make sense of what she is saying, and I would be happy to hear your rebutle if you think its more credible.
nowandforever117 1 year ago
@nowandforever117 Last time I checked I didn't take orders from self righteous prats and don't call me your "bro" its unsettling. If you actually experienced love and I asked you "So nowandforever117 would you agree that snorting cocaine and being in love both surmount to the same level of "fulfillment"?". For your sake Ill take it that you aren't a complete tard to which I hypothesise your answer would be "no". But go snort cocaine or pretend you know what love is for all I care.....
perfectack 1 year ago
self righteous prats=people who don't totally agree with you? Nice logic... Also I would like to know why you think you know what your talking about.... Got a degree? Or are you just in possession of an opinion...?
nowandforever117 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nowandforever117 I was unaware whether you agreed with me or not so don't delude yourself thinking I care what you think, you are just another youtube idiot to me." I would like to know why you think you know what your talking about...Got a degree?", I do not disclose information when demanded by a complete stranger who shows little higher cognitive functioning than a lemming and for your information I do possess a BSc in Computer Science. Btw learn the difference between "your" and "you're"
perfectack 1 year ago
@perfectack its called academics. The formal exchange of knowledge that relies solely on the honesty of those who are being credited. You should of learned that in your english classes in college. The fact that she is a well known doctor of psychology speaks well against your computer BSc degree.... and .. burn..
nowandforever117 1 year ago
@nowandforever117 What? it's almost been 2 months!! It took you that long to come up with such a waffle riddled reply that fancifully dances around what you are trying to say without actually saying it. Also don't talk down to others about english when you can't even use it "you should HAVE learned that" not "of" you illiterate douché. Also unlike you I have a degree so I think you are more applicable to the "burn" comment :P enjoy being a stupid illiterate kid who faps to some old bint :P
perfectack 1 year ago
Comment removed
perfectack 1 year ago
@farmgirlnicole I am sick of people just quoting scientific garbage at me that they themselves have no fucking clue about.
Have you carried out these tests yourself? have you seen the results? have you fucking monitored the dopamine
levels and cross referenced a person in love and a cocaine addict? Do you even know what love is?
perfectack 1 year ago
a world without love would be no world at all, seeing as how love = reproduction. It would also be a world of peace, as love leads to rivalry and frustration.
TimothyParadox1 1 year ago
you can't say that a world without love would be a peaceful world. After all all the crazy muslim terrorists are sexually repressed virgins.
JordanKimball 1 year ago
What I mean with "a world without love", is a world where sexual attraction does not exist.
TimothyParadox1 1 year ago
Wait so when men cheat it's "Adulterous" but when females cheat it's sexually liberating? This is the dialect that gives uneducated people the misconception that feminists are in fact one sided. Please revise your language dear.
Cr8zyCanuck 1 year ago
Preaching inequality in gender is not preaching gender equality. She is not a feminist. She is a scientific thinker concerned with the truth. Yes there are more male geniuses and male screw ups in this world than there are female screw ups or geniuses. We don't need a joke to show the remnants and the ongoings of a male dominated world. Women have yet to fully demonstrate their ability in this world. Do I think they will do a better job than men. Yes. Have they proven enough. No.
Cr8zyCanuck 1 year ago
I could not agree more, Margret Thatcher did an outstanding job of destroying indusrty, taking peoples jobs and homes, crushing the voice of the hard working man or WOMAN by destroying workers unions. Promoting "greed is good" so the rich got richer and the poor got what they deserved.
Do I think they will do a better job than men. Yes. Have they proven enough. More than enough thank you!
CBRRRT 1 year ago
Right so love... and gender equality? What's going on here? Preaching a little?
Cr8zyCanuck 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The most interesting points to me about romantic love were at these times:
05:13 - scans of brains show feeling of romantic love is similar to cocaine rush;
05:44 - romantic love is not an emotion, it is a drive, originating in the craving part of mind
06:53 - romantic love involves 3 brain systems:
(1) sex drive,
(2) elation love to focus mating energy,
(3) attachment feelings to tolerate mate long enough to raise kids
CravingCannibal 1 year ago
women speak better than men? than aristotle? than plato? than einstein? than dirac? than jfk? than kant? than rousseau? montaigne? montesqieu? diderot? etc., etc., hmmmm
pikiwiki 1 year ago
@pikiwiki , you are truly picky...giving those examples. You forget to give a cultural context and historical background, which are crucial! Women had no chance to get even some education, not to mention education all those man got. As Ms Fisher said woman had never been in the position before, so educated and capable.
MeltedIceberg 1 year ago
spam
cheguevara228 1 year ago
Facinating, inciteful and well worth half an hour to listen to and ponder over.
AVALONELFY 1 year ago
good
ytwatchpagetester 1 year ago
Stupid and gau
TapTapJoker14 1 year ago
The problem, as I see it, with scientific analysis of "Love" is that science uses the presumption that a person is just a complex of parts and acts which can be quantified and defined. That is true,TO A POINT. But to a Christian, more essentially, a person is a spirit with self awareness which can freely will, think and choose, can never die and has a divine spark within, that connects to and grows spiritually via Graceful Open-Heated Love towards the Godhead through the person of Jesus Christ.
OneFifthNative 1 year ago
Stay in the pulpit
macthornberg 1 year ago
What a pity to have annoyed you to the point of giving me an order. I just feel it appropriate to highlight to you that I prefaced my comment in the very first sentence with "as I see it" . So if you had any brains you would have replied analytically on my points.
OneFifthNative 1 year ago
There is no analysis when there is no evidence. Back you go. You cannot be reasoned with. If I had 1 piece if evidence that really flew about a god I would be in the pulpit with you. Now fuck off.
macthornberg 1 year ago
That's quite a strong reaction. Wonder where those feelings originate. Feel free to return with an intelligent constructive debate based on my initial comment anytime. May Jesus grace you.
OneFifthNative 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE facts of three emotional feeling classes that they declare command upon have been awarded already BY ISLAM
MEN are allowed 4 marriages and I think its as follows in accordance with the latest findings about human emotions
one for arranged
one for attachment
one for sexdrive
one for love
whereas WOMEN are awarded 2 chances of marriage because for girls there is always two men in life
perfect marriage system laid down by ISLAM
zeb120 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE facts of three emotional feeling classes that they declare command upon have been awarded already BY ISLAM
MEN are allowed 4 marriages and I think its as follows in accordance with the latest findings about human emotions
one for arranged
one for attachment
one for sexdrive
one for love
whereas WOMEN are awarded 2 chances of marriage because for girls there is always two men in life
perfect marriage system laid down by ISLAM
zeb120 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE facts of three emotional feeling classes that they declare command upon have been awarded already BY ISLAM
MEN are allowed 4 marriages and I think its as follows in accordance with the latest findings about human emotions
one for arranged
one for attachment
one for sexdrive
one for love
whereas WOMEN are awarded 2 chances of marriage because for girls there is always two men in life
perfect marriage system laid down by ISLAM
zeb120 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE facts of three emotional feeling classes that they declare command upon have been awarded already BY ISLAM
MEN are allowed 4 marriages and I think its as follows in accordance with the latest findings about human emotions
one for arranged
one for attachment
one for sexdrive
one for love
whereas WOMEN are awarded 2 chances of marriage because for girls there is always two men in life
perfect marriage system laid down by ISLAM
zeb120 1 year ago
THE facts of three emotional feeling classes that they declare command upon have been awarded already BY ISLAM
MEN are allowed 4 marriages and I think its as follows in accordance with the latest findings about human emotions
one for arranged
one for attachment
one for sexdrive
one for love
whereas WOMEN are awarded 2 chances of marriage because for girls there is always two men in life
perfect marriage system laid down by ISLAM
zeb120 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE facts of three emotional feeling classes that they declare command upon have been awarded already BY ISLAM
MEN are allowed 4 marriages and I think its as follows in accordance with the latest findings about human emotions
one for arranged
one for attachment
one for sexdrive
one for love
whereas WOMEN are awarded 2 chances of marriage because for girls there is always two men in life
perfect marriage system laid down by ISLAM
zeb120 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE facts of three emotional feeling classes that they declare command upon have been awarded already BY ISLAM
MEN are allowed 4 marriages and I think its as follows in accordance with the latest findings about human emotions
one for arranged
one for attachment
one for sexdrive
one for love
whereas WOMEN are awarded 2 chances of marriage because for girls there is always two men in life
perfect marriage system laid down by ISLAM
zeb120 1 year ago
I am in love with myself. No-one will ever take precedence over me. Happy Valentine's Day, Mac. Why thank you, Mac! *Kisses self*
MacJaxonManOfAction 1 year ago
I respect those who love themselves. It's a fabulous head start!
jkt1138 1 year ago
From how she's defining "romantic love", the word infatuation comes to mind, a dilusional love or lust for something or someone!
An0therBr0ther 1 year ago
Have you ever done anything that's bad?
God says we all have and don't deserve heaven.
Romans 3 :23
But God had a plan since before we all sinned, to save us from hell. He sent Jesus to die for us.
So now all we have to do is put our trust in Jesus and turn from our sin.
andyboreland 1 year ago
Jesus died for his own sins, not mine.
CBRRRT 1 year ago
So what sins did Jesus Christ commit then?
andyboreland 1 year ago
F@rk knows, but he didnt die for mine. Talk to someone that cares.
CBRRRT 1 year ago
Jesus struck a child, attacked businesses in the temple? he was a terror, and righteous as well, which must have made it unbearable.
PrivateSchoolBoy 1 year ago
Struck a child? I don't think so.
And He threw over tables of people who were robbing people in God's (His father's) house!
That is not a sin.
Jesus died for YOU
andyboreland 1 year ago
Jesus did not die, prove Jesus !
T
drunkpanda37 1 year ago
History, the Bible, space, science.
You should watch Louis Giglio for space and science.
Jesus died on a cross, maybe the most agonising death possible, all for you. And you deny He even existed!
andyboreland 1 year ago
it should be only 1 marriage shared equal by 1 man & 1 woman.
we all know this, anyone who says different, is a player or a whore.
jinglessmile 1 year ago
I don't share her views about anti-depressants or at least the one I have taken-seroxat also called peroxatine. A selective seratonin reuptake inhibitor. My experience is that about 12-18 hours after taking it I feel very pleasantly horny. I explain as follows-the drug allows me to stop wasting emotional (and sexual?) enerygy on my mental issues and as a result my sexual/emotional energy builds up and so 12-18 hours later I feel happily horny.. Of course if I had a fulfilling social life I would
MateofDorothy 1 year ago
not need seroxat to gradually restore my depleted emotional/sexual energy. But since I am a stranger in a city of strangers what can I expect?
MateofDorothy 1 year ago
Glad for your experience. I think the trends still stand tho.
jkt1138 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
these athiest cunts dont understand one thing
the facts of three emotional feeling classes that they declare command upon have been awarded already BY ISLAM
men are allowed 4 marriages
one for arranged
one for attachment
one for sexdrive
one for love
whereas women are awarded 2 chances of marriage because for girls there is always two men in life
perfect marriage system laid down by ISLAM
zeb120 1 year ago
lol your an idiot, love the profile picture by the way, you look like you've had a few cocks
PINKxxFLOYD 1 year ago
@zeb120
Yep, there's a reason to not follow religion.
jonohutton89 1 year ago
Where did you get this from. Show me proof.
An0therBr0ther 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
these athiest cunts dont understand one thing
the facts of three emotional feeling classes that they declare command upon have been awarded already BY ISLAM
men are allowed 4 marriages
one for arranged
one for attachment
one for sexdrive
one for love
whereas women are awarded 2 chances of marriage because for girls there is always two men in life
perfect marriage system laid down by ISLAM
zeb120 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
these athiest cunts dont understand one thing
the facts of three emotional feeling classes that they declare command upon have been awarded already BY ISLAM
men are allowed 4 marriages
one for arranged
one for attachment
one for sexdrive
one for love
whereas women are awarded 2 chances of marriage because for girls there is always two men in life
perfect marriage system laid down by ISLAM
zeb120 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
these athiest cunts dont understand one thing
the facts of three emotional feeling classes that they declare command upon have been awarded already BY ISLAM
men are allowed 4 marriages
one for arranged
one for attachment
one for sexdrive
one for love
whereas women are awarded 2 chances of marriage because for girls there is always two men in life
perfect marriage system laid down by ISLAM
zeb120 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
these athiest cunts dont understand one thing
the facts of three emotional feeling classes that they declare command upon have been awarded already BY ISLAM
men are allowed 4 marriages
one for arranged
one for attachment
one for sexdrive
one for love
whereas women are awarded 2 chances of marriage because for girls there is always two men in life
perfect marriage system laid down by ISLAM
zeb120 1 year ago
She just needs a fuck, but not from me my friends not from me
PINKxxFLOYD 1 year ago
the bmw adverts that bookend this video are absolute far-fetched nonsense
Sgrappyina 1 year ago
what a very interesting and thought provoking video. Love is what should make the world go around, not war, religion or money. If we made more love and less war we would all be a lot happier.
Thank you helen.
russocollection 1 year ago 3
@russocollection
I agree
ESKARA616 1 year ago 2
THIS WOMAN SOUNDS AS IF she is about to break into CRYING PERIOD
zeb120 1 year ago 2
I feel like going out, and for some reason have sex lol.
rorygherbert1990 1 year ago
cool
kcisboy75 1 year ago
this is a futile attempt to profess upon a subject which has no real definition. what is romantic love because from my point of view love has no parallels with romanticism. romantic love is simply a self imposed illusion to disguise the harsh reality that we are in hell, nature is unforgiving, sentient life is uggly and predictable and the tangible universe is a mass of paradoxical contradictions. romance is a heavy smothering act of rape that taints the only truly beautiful thing we have.
boosomentity 1 year ago
I utterly agree with you. That's why I stand for singles appreciation day.
TheGentlemansShadow 1 year ago
What is the only truely beautiful thing we have?
FeelThatChairNow 1 year ago
@FeelThatChairNow love dummy;0)
the word love from my stand point means an open mind and an open hand, fearless and forgiving in the absence of all ego.
boosomentity 1 year ago
You can also distract yourself from the unbearable aspects of your life by buying a sports car . So to you, romantic love is paralleled with a Porche. I think I prefer Fisher's "futile attempt" to take interest in why we feel love the way we do then your extremely subjective, potentially cliched and darn right pathetic excuse for edgy "dead poets society"-esque horse shit.
icantstopdoingthis 1 year ago
@icantstopdoingthis hello. could you explain the romantic love and porche comment. i find the rest of your rant a little sweeping and with no real ligitimacy cliched you might say.. before the child like literary posturing continues i suggest engaging in convo. pottentialy cliched!!!!?? with 6 billion people in the world thats a given. subjective yes but extremely thats an exageration. my personal experiences are not to be taken lightly and i could expand upon what i had previousl ywrote.
boosomentity 1 year ago
@icantstopdoingthis also smell my cheese haha
boosomentity 1 year ago
Being the Internet superior does not mean anything. There's always somebody smarter or better-informed than you, PublicSchoolBoy.
TheBloggMan 1 year ago
haha, but of course. I'm not sure i said i was "the internet superior" but i take offense to people who dont look at arguments for their merits and grant equal value to everything they read because they confuse the right to an opinion with a right to be listened to or a right not to be criticised. the latter two are, obviously, absurd.
PrivateSchoolBoy 1 year ago
@PrivateSchoolBoy right on dude but its time to giv it a rest youl burst a blood vesel there may be differing opinions on this subject but sind some time for some very un romantic sagginfg its good for you end of.
boosomentity 1 year ago
Funny. Women will prevail, when the mail becomes extinct. And this old lady is turninig into a man. go figure.
ANTIDALLARD 1 year ago
Erm..Isn't she a sexist, she always argues against men in the video and tells all the advantages about women and nothing about men....she doesn't make sense anyway....
skyliner288 1 year ago
pyramidiot1 1 year ago
PrivateSchoolBoy stop talking like you're everyone's intellectual superior or something.. ''you don't think hard enough''.. Fuck off like... Hahaha
MusicalTeddybearBomb 1 year ago
and who are you, the fucking justice league? Dont tell me what to do and don't even mention my intellect unless you've got some counter arguments. You clearly only took offence to my remark because i am your superior
PrivateSchoolBoy 1 year ago
like what? , by the way. Fuck off like what?
PrivateSchoolBoy 1 year ago
Fucking bollocks. Stupid bitch.
benabenb 1 year ago
check dis gangsta vid out tony montana at his best get me bruvva!!! v=HX-_EyOzE0k
talen2k7 1 year ago
ooh so the world move thanks to women! I didn't know we (guys) were useless!, this Speech is quite biased.
f37talon 1 year ago
@f37talon
It didn't say that at all
Antworkk