@caveymoley There's no evidence they used bows and arrows in that area before that. not this people. Spears yes, but not bows. Maybe they did use, but you can't say that with certainty.
We can't forget that, at this time, the humans were already spread all over the globe. America included. Some of them have already invented the bow and/or the atlatl, others not. Technology advances differently for different cultures and places.
@Foxley Oh please the bow and arrow is at least 50,000 years old through evidence from Africa. Following migration patterns, the Natufians may have already had the the bow and arrow. By 16,000 years, people were already practicing fletching. There's no way by that time the Natufians wouldn't know what a bow and arrow was, especially since a few thousand years later the first empire would emerge from Mesopoatmia (assuming the Natufians traded with them.
@fadouka123 Ok, you are making a lot of assumptions to suport your idea. But again, there's no evidence. Maybe they did used bows and arrows but...
Like there's no evidence that the australian abourigenous people have ever used bow and arrows. And thare's a difference between know what something is and use that same thing.
But they were not chiefs and leaders of large settlements of 400+ people living in one place year after year. It's like saying there were always fathers in families.
@lucy1lucy1 ..i'm answering myself..what i mean by explain is that the movie makers went to a great deal of trouble to set the scene for the re-enactment, but they did not include any evidence of the production of the sophisticated fabrics in their scenario
theres a prof. at columbia who has a series of WORLD history lectures on the YT...i recommend
@lucy1lucy1 Yeah thats inaccurate, just ignore it. At this point they would have been wearing animal skins, looms weren't around until like maybe 4000 BC at the earliest but even that's stretching it pretty far. They had them in Mesopotamia. The rest is accurate enough though just try not to dwell on stuff like that.
Loving the series!
WalksThroughLife 2 weeks ago
The show is really awful.
Snipe4261 1 month ago
ah ok i get it...woven clothes and communal farming came before the invention of the bow? wtf are they talking about?!?
caveymoley 2 months ago
@caveymoley There's no evidence they used bows and arrows in that area before that. not this people. Spears yes, but not bows. Maybe they did use, but you can't say that with certainty.
We can't forget that, at this time, the humans were already spread all over the globe. America included. Some of them have already invented the bow and/or the atlatl, others not. Technology advances differently for different cultures and places.
Foxley 1 month ago
@Foxley Oh please the bow and arrow is at least 50,000 years old through evidence from Africa. Following migration patterns, the Natufians may have already had the the bow and arrow. By 16,000 years, people were already practicing fletching. There's no way by that time the Natufians wouldn't know what a bow and arrow was, especially since a few thousand years later the first empire would emerge from Mesopoatmia (assuming the Natufians traded with them.
fadouka123 1 month ago 2
@fadouka123 Ok, you are making a lot of assumptions to suport your idea. But again, there's no evidence. Maybe they did used bows and arrows but...
Like there's no evidence that the australian abourigenous people have ever used bow and arrows. And thare's a difference between know what something is and use that same thing.
Foxley 1 month ago
I think even today we can still learn a lot from these people.
UnitedEuropa 2 months ago
these videos are great.thanks for posting
jackalan88 4 months ago
Some glaring inaccuracies in this video for example at 7:00, chiefs and leaders are present in hunter gatherer societies. Not just civilized ones.
jfnovotny 4 months ago
@jfnovotny
But they were not chiefs and leaders of large settlements of 400+ people living in one place year after year. It's like saying there were always fathers in families.
FSMonster 3 months ago
so..they havent explained where these folks are getting their woven fabric..?..or did i miss something?
lucy1lucy1 5 months ago 13
@lucy1lucy1 they bought them at Cave-mart, where else.
darbone 4 months ago 5
@lucy1lucy1 Leather probably.
TechnoManiac2 4 months ago
@lucy1lucy1 Probably flax. According to wikipedia, Died flax fibers and weaving evidence have been found dating to at least 27,000 years ago.
samusssbm85 1 month ago
@lucy1lucy1 ..i'm answering myself..what i mean by explain is that the movie makers went to a great deal of trouble to set the scene for the re-enactment, but they did not include any evidence of the production of the sophisticated fabrics in their scenario
theres a prof. at columbia who has a series of WORLD history lectures on the YT...i recommend
lucy1lucy1 1 month ago
@lucy1lucy1 Yeah thats inaccurate, just ignore it. At this point they would have been wearing animal skins, looms weren't around until like maybe 4000 BC at the earliest but even that's stretching it pretty far. They had them in Mesopotamia. The rest is accurate enough though just try not to dwell on stuff like that.
PuppetMask 2 weeks ago
we shoudnt really disturb thair graves
14rvega 6 months ago
@14rvega You're an idiot!
ckndr 5 months ago
@ckndr not just an idiot he is also ignoramus and moron or more primitive to stone age people in docu
dactylus90 4 months ago
Wow man this changes the meaning of my life. Thank you.
DeusVivus 1 year ago
AllHistories: thank you so much for posting these 300+ documentaries. I love this kind of television show
slovakmath 1 year ago 18
first again!
BigWheelaCatPeelaYea 1 year ago
@BigWheelaCatPeelaYea and?
stoltobot 1 year ago
@BigWheelaCatPeelaYea cookie?
hotsauceinyoureye 7 months ago