Edgar Cayce & David Wilcock: Astrological Affinities

[Cezarexxx]

I have a lot of friends who look like the people on cayces life ;But dont look anything at all like such a wilcok .How do you explain that? I am the reincarnation Of Pontious Pilates and Why my name is Cesarexxx?

[oldstock1607]

I've heard that Edgar Cayce had a WAY bigger hog.

[DiErVoNmAnE]

Gullible people. If I took a serious vow in persuading people that I was jesus reincarnated I bet I could just as easily deceive you into believing my claims. That shows me just how ignorant most supposed educated people are. What you all should devote yourselves to do is reading the bible rather than make yourselves look like complete jackasses. Dw is a very good liar simply because he believes his own lies.

[tkthemidway]

ill just add this before i go. its good that youre thinking about things and trying to figure things out...but youre already drawing conclusions. way, WAY out there conclusions and then posting videos and arguing with people that you have this strong "evidence" that david wilcok is EC reincarnated and is some kind of prophet or something. what if your friends and family see this? i would be embarrassed

[guitaoist]

When did I ever say he was the reincarnation? Strawman. Anyways I'm pointing out what apparently eight thousand people are curious about. What do you have to say that ppl r curious about? I have five hundred videos this isn't my only contribution.

[tkthemidway]

look man, i dont want to be a dick or anything. you have a right to believe what you want NEITHER of us can prove a damn thing. but circumstantial similarities just arent good evidence. youre making some pretty extraordinary claims with some pretty unextraordinary evidence, thats all im trying to say

[tkthemidway]

this is just pathetically absurd, anyone that believes this needs help. david wilcock is a strange little fellow who needs to believe he is edgar cayce reincarnated in order to feel important. and , if hes cayce, wouldnt he still be psychic? did he lose that? he hasnt even made any accurate predictions, hes given no reason for anyone to believe him his claims. and weak minded youtubers automatically believe anything they hear on youtube. an open mind is one thing...but youre just being obtuse

[guitaoist]

He has already explained why he doesn't mke the same kind of predicktioins on his website. I thought u did ur research? Anyway I am the opposite of weak minded, proof is that I read who I criticize or meantion. U obviously do not. You haven't a clue as to astrologys relevance because you haven't seen my tupac video, or my 400 other talking vids where I pwn your type in the daily.

[tkthemidway]

@guitaoist LOL "you havent even seen my tupac video"...that right there is enough reason for him to not watch your videos or take you seriously. and anyone who uses the word "pwn" is obviously highly intellectual and should be taken very seriously :) ...yes, you ARE weak minded

[guitaoist]

And you won't ever know shit if u never take suggestions. Way to show superiority.

What evidence can there be for astrology? Psychological. And since u need calculators only for your boring ass truths it's hard for me to start it with you. Your not even competition once u decline my evidence. Peace bitch.

[tkthemidway]

@guitaoist ill be a nice guy and reply once more..."what evidence can there be for astrology?" NONE, precisely my point.

my "boring ass truths"? LOL holy cow son, if you want fantasy instead of truths, then just keep heading down the road you are on. i thought the point was to find the truths, not merely fantasize and wish for things to be true

im not competition once i decline your evidence? YOU HAVE NONE. that is not evidence, learn the difference. perhaps in a few years well talk again

[guitaoist]

Yeah when you can finally drink alcohol? You want astrology evidence? Here's anotherrecommendation you'll ignore to prove your real lack of intellectual integrity : cosmos and psyche by Richard Tarnas....go ahead don't read it I dare you be in the dark.

[N1k1mon]

@tkthemidway I didnt even know/believe in Reincarnation until a few years ago (Simply because I had always been told by small minds it didnt or couldnt be possible..or was against God's will) and I have looked into the David Wilcock/Edgar Cayce connection and its the absolute, most clear cut, ridiculously self evident case of reincarnation you could expect to find. If this doesnt prove it to you, NOTHING WILL. Anybody who doesnt believe this is absolutely ignorant of the subject or afraid.

[tkthemidway]

@N1k1mon no, its not ignorance, its called contemplation over time, which you havent even experienced, because you admittedly only came across the idea of reincarnation a few years ago. i used to believe in reincarnation, many years ago. i used to believe in a soul. i used to believe in the daddy in the sky. i no longer do. not because im angry or sad or confused, but because im waking up. hopefully someday you will too if youre not misled by jerkoffs like DW first

[N1k1mon]

@tkthemidway Perhaps I was unclear..Ive known about reincarnation for many years but only allowed myself to believe in it about 4 1/2 - 5 years ago. Im sorry but 5 years is a pretty good chunk of time when you devote nearly every waking hour to the esoteric studies of spirit and philosophy as I have. Not to say Im an expert, far from it. Due to a major illness I was put on my back for 3 1/2 of those 5 years and almost all of that time was put to use researching, studying, contemplating, etc...

[tkthemidway]

@N1k1mon 5 years isnt shit, thats just the beginning. and i used to devote countless hours to reading books on different religions and philosopy and reincarnation and god consciousness and all that as well, but i never took that giant plunge to steadfastly believing outrageous claims made by weirdos on youtube because they looked like someone who lived a long time ago and wrote a book

[N1k1mon]

@tkthemidway 5 years may not be shit if its a past time or a hobby, its been my life due to a severe illness and having nothing else to do, but whatever, you know it all. Its one thing to discuss something with somebody but you insist on dismissing and completely rejecting everything said that doesnt agree with your version. Heck, a person could spend 25 years focusing on something wrongly, but I guess if its all about numbers alone, then you're right. I humbly bow to your greatness. =)

[rectangle12341]

@tkthemidway you are lost.

[N1k1mon]

@tkthemidway I feel I have at least the right to comment even though I am no adept or master. Ive never seen any good evidence to disprove the claims of DW other than ridicule, assumptions, misinfo, disinfo and lame ad hominems trying to base the case off of his character flaws. Or because Cayce talked about being alive in 2100 they assume he couldnt have come before, it doesnt enter their minds he could have been talking about 2 incarnations down the road even though he mentioned hed be in '98.

[tkthemidway]

@N1k1mon and ive no evidence that santa claus doesnt exist either, does that mean he is real? nice logic

[N1k1mon]

@tkthemidway You missed the logic, actually. There is ample proof that it is true, whereas youve got nothing to show it isnt true. That makes perfect sense to me and is very logical. If you had some sort of evidence that nullified his claims, then you would have a leg to stand on. What dont you get? Its far from saying something about santa claus where there is no proof that there is AND it doesnt even make sense. Apples and oranges, logical fallacy. I know you wont care, so no worries.

[Portyy85]

@N1k1mon You're absolutely correct. Every single claim I've witnessed of people trying to disprove Wilcock's claims have been ad hominems.

[N1k1mon]

@tkthemidway I dont believe in a "sky daddy", I believe in an eternal Source...a Creator of all things. If that makes me naive or silly...so be it. I happen to believe we live in a plane of existence where it is extremely hard to see past the illusion of nothingness, that it is actually a big part of the entire "game", to not really have proof one way or the other so that one must truly dig in and seek. Im sorry you gave up, Ive been there, but then I had experiences which re-woke me up to more.

[N1k1mon]

@tkthemidway 1) He looks exactlylike Cayce, 2) He has about 7 close friends/family members who look exactly like Cayce's soul group, 3) He was born with nearly the same Astrological chart, DW's birthday is said to be the exact best day out of 127 years possible for EC to have been reborn, 4) DW is an accurate channeler, 5) HEs been posting predictions for years that have come true, 6) He lived in Virginia Beach exactly as EC prophesied about his next life along with dozens of other prophecies...

[tkthemidway]

@N1k1mon i see, so whenever someone is born who looks just like someone (and he DOESNT look JUST like him anyway) then that means they must be the reincarnation of that person? COME ON.....this is just stupid. i wont waste any more time replying to this

[N1k1mon]

@tkthemidway 7) EC said he would be back in 1998, DW first publicized his Cayce connection iin 1998, 8) His life's work is spent fulfilling EC's claims, i.e. the book series Convergence validates endless claims of Cayce's that couldnt have been validated before because the science was behind the times. The list goes on and on and the odds are astronomical that even a few of those would be true. The fact is, you dont want to believe it, I however HAVE DONE THE HOMEWORK and its airtight. Sorry guy

[tkthemidway]

@N1k1mon hey einstein, did it ever occur to you, that david wilcock has been claiming to be EC for years? maybe he PLANNED to publicize this crap in 1998, knowing that EC had already predicted it? i mean DURRR this isnt rocket science. anything he does or says is based on something hes read or knows about EC. how exactly is that a validation? are you really this simple? youve done your homework huh? forgive my skepticism

[N1k1mon]

@tkthemidway Im just going to call you out here., Im sure youve done extensive research about it, which includes reading a fair amount of his work, 7 of his books are posted free on his website. Im also assuming you've read the book by Wynn Free The Reincarnation of Edgar Cayce, and looked through his articles, free readings and info hes provided as well as talked to people who actually know Wilcock (You claim to know his motives), right?? Or hes a big one,.MAYBE TALKED TO THE MAN HIMSELF??

[tkthemidway]

@N1k1mon youre not calling anyone out anywhere bub...put it this way, ive gathered enough info over the years, and have enough common sense, experience and logic to know this is nonsense, and if you think astrology has any credibility at all...well then i think this conversation need go no further. tell me, what "extensive" research have you done? attempting to decipher a couple astrological charts? read a few books and websites? thats not research. everything i said in my original post stands

[crawfordgray]

This video preys on people unaccustomed to the natural tendency of humans to recognize patterns and similarities when there are none.

Please. People. Be smart. Read.

[guitaoist]

Take your own advice . Cosmos and Psyche, Richard Tarnas

[N1k1mon]

I think it's part of the Monte Carlo fallacy; wilcock's claim has nothing to do with any other claim so his can't be disregarded based on the concept of other people claiming they were famous, there's no interrelation.

[N1k1mon]

Well of course you're going to use the pictures that reveal the resemblance more than not... Funny that would make him a fraud. People don't use the brains god gave them. Uhhh nobodys saying everybody was a famous person, yet look at the odds of who you're going to hear making a claim. I guess Wilcock should decide he can't be Cayce because he was famous. There's a big logical fallacy in that, i just can't remember what it's called but I think it's part of the Monte Carlo fallacy; wilcock's cla

[N1k1mon]

@guitaoist

People talk a lot of shit on Wilcock and some say he's disinfo or black ops or just a complete fraud. Other than his "Ra channeling", which I can't listen to, I'm not at all sure about the whole channeling bit and until I am it's on the back burner, I completely connect with the dudes energy and his longing for spiritual, magical experiences in life and I feel like he's 100% sincere. If anything, I think he's in a bind having to sort out the bullshit being thrown at him to discredit

[terransage]

I've been hearing about Edgar Cayce a lot lately--all by accident--and I just learned about David Wilcock and watched a few of his videos. Now I learn that they're both Pisces sun, Mercury and Venus, same as me. I've never thought of myself as a psychic, but I sure do have a lot of synchronicity and psychic or intuitive experiences. Very interesting video.

[baccaratbargaineq]

Free energy is finaly here!But the Oil coporations life depends on covering this up,Get a real free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the energy revolution!

[LemonOdette]

but did he take pictures of those friends deliberately in those positions? cuz the poses are similar. so much so it can't be a coincidence. they do look similar, it's eerie. but why is it important that we know he's cayce?

[guitaoist]

because he has contributed much and has been reading psychic books since he was 5 which ultimately implies the high probablity that reincarntion is a very real thing..kinda a big deal.

[LemonOdette]

@guitaoist i know reincarnation is a real thing. i just don't know if he is edgar cayce. why would his group all look similar. i dunno. oh well. what really matters is what he has to offer.

[guitaoist]

true but the pics ARE creepily similar...you should try to look like edgar cayce...kinda hard i bet, despite what "position" its in.

[tomchrist777]

@LemonOdette check out the book "the reincarnation of edgar cayce?" . when you look at all of the information it really starts to make sense.

[tkthemidway]

@LemonOdette you dont "know" reincarnation is real at all, that is a false statement. you BELIEVE reincarnation is real, you could very well be wrong my friend. and please dont tell me you remember your past lives. there is a big difference between knowing and thinking or believing. i personally dont believe in reincarnation simply because i dont believe in a permanent self or "soul", but that is my OPINION, and i cannot prove anything. neither can you

[guitaoist]

Right, and you 'believe' it isn't. How are you more correct than we who only have to know in our hearts anyway and just the blind slowly emerge from darkness when ready.?

[LemonOdette]

@LemonOdette considering i'm a girl it would be hard. :P

[LemonOdette]

@LemonOdette oops i replied to myself. lol.

[BergenCafe]

so you find two lookalikes from the past and present.... proof is right there, right. how do you explain the michael jackson and elvis lookalikes

[guitaoist]

so your a complete dumbass?

[kahetel13]

@guitaoist honestly theres nothing spiritual about you at all ; you attack people for asking you questions in a comparison and you defend to much . and i also agree you make a mockery of what reincarnation is. thank goodness its not what you think it is . good luck in your delusions and hopefully youlll find a way out of them

[guitaoist]

asking questions? you asked nothing worth considering. so im not spiritual because im real? what is reincarnation to you then oh spirit guru body?

[CelticVictory]

This very idea mocks reincarnation to begin with.

[guitaoist]

how so bro

[CelticVictory]

@guitaoist When someone is reincarnated, in theory, they do not come back looking like they used to, they can come back looking completely different but to suggest that looking similiar is a sign of reincarnation is ridiculous to the point of ridicule. There is a concept of genetic reincarnation, but that simply refers to someone having similiar genetic material seperated by time and are usually genetically related and never really from completely different families. And no spirituality involved

[phulme61]

It's all bogus - numerology - astrology - mediums- Psychics - tarot etc - it' all belongs in the land of make belive?, Ps - I'm Spectical of your non Scepticism ?

[guitaoist]

yeah all fake its been proven so im just going to hell or wasting my time?

oh wait.. NOTHING has been proved by you skeptics EITHER! lest we woulndt STILL BE EXPERIENCING PSYCHIC ACTIVITY LIKE WE ACTUALLY ARE!

[EjPwned]

I get bad energy from just listening to or looking at david wilcock, he isnt what he Claims to be. alex collier, peggy kane are just a few others i get bad energy from. although reversal speech is accurate i dont trust niether of their intentions.

[TheTruthGardian]

Umm, I think this is a lot of rubbish. It is not a coinicidence for I do not believe in them. But I think God has created David Wilcock to look similar to Edgar Cayce so that their hearts can be hardend, God did it to Pherio 3 times after he hardend it himself 7 times. We are living in a time where God is distinguishing Christianity from lies, however what are the lies and what are the truths? Those will not be distinguished until the end of time.

[lumpfish99]

why is it reincarnated dudes were always famous in a past life?.....how come they were never a shop assisstant or burger flipper or something.....??? its al bs.....

[guitaoist]

whos says he was only that one famous person? coulda been a bird in between no one negates that

[ELULTIMOEXILIO1]

SI LLEVA UN ESTILO DE VIDA DISTINTO A EDGAR Y COBRA ES LOGICO QUE ES UN ACTOR IMPUESTO PARA MANIPULAR. EDGAR NO BUSCARIA ESO EN VIDA EL ERA SENCILLO Y HUMANITARIO ALEJADO DE LA FAMA QUE LE PRECEDIA, ESTE TIPO DEL CUAL NO HE VISTO MAS QUE ESTE VIDEO ES DISTINTO.

[Akbalnfr]

Want more accurate reincarnation links?

Grigori Rasputin - David Wilcock

Edgar Cayce - Daniel Craig

Edgar's Wife - Eva Green

Dmitri Pavlovich - David's brother

General Denikin - David's father

Vladimir Purishkevich - Jude

Raoul Loveday - Christopher?

Irina Alexandrovna - Angelica?

[JohnnyRussianBlowDro]

@Akbalnfr y are they all russian?

[Akbalnfr]

@JohnnyRussianBlowDro Because they were born in Russia.

[JohnnyRussianBlowDro]

@Akbalnfr oh i cudive guessed dat..lol

[Aic1944]

Its interesting, we'll never really know.

[natydredloc]

so is cocksy trying 2 say that when u get reincarnated u come back as the same star sign ?

[walterwz]

I think RPGs and MMORPGs have some interesting parallels in soul evolution and incarnation. If the David Wilcock/ Case phenomenon is valid, it is like rolling the exact same character in WOW as you might have in EQII. Now the way each game rolls characters is different. It is more like rolling 2 or more of the same character in one game. The replay value is questionable.

[moomay11649]

Edgar Cayce is fascinating.

[fal2grace]

David says he's the reincarnation of Casey. hmmm

[HaleyMary]

interesting. Especially all the physical similarities in the faces of him and his friends.

[lochmabon]

@HaleyMary

I don't see any similarity to Wilcock and Cayce at all. The length of Wilcock's face, chin, nose, jawline, along with the shape of his ears are all completely different.

I find more credibility in Brainstalin's assertion that Wilcock is actually the incarnation of Vlad the Impaler and Rasputin instead. When you match Wilcock's face to those two, and look at the rest of the soul group he has come up with, the comparison of Wilcock to Cayce becomes even more ridiculous.