Question... How does the expansion of our universe result in an increase of energy? Based on the Law of Conservational energy one would come to the conclusion that the volume is simply increase resulting a "less dense" universe. However what this idea proposes is that dark energy is somehow converted into our universe and imbalances its naturual state. The question then becomes... by what means is this conversion possible?
I would say that in our 3D world it only looks like energy is NOT conserved when it comes to general relativity, that's because space-time is not only in 3D but time is 4D.
So you would have to look at that problem in 4D way and I bet you would find that energy is conserved in 4D.
If in our 3D world with general relativity energy seems to be lost, it's because in 4D it's gained by the same amount.
@sonnydey I agree with someday.. If we observe the expansion according to how you see the 10 dimensions each 3rd dimensional slice is the boundary which contains our energy. If we move along that 4th dimensional line should not each frame contain a consistent amount of energy? Furthermore, if it does not then at the point at which an event occurs there must presumably be some transfer of energy across 4th dimensional timelines. Does this mean energy, like gravity, effects multiple dimensions?
@sonnydey I agree ... If we observe the expansion according to how you see the 10 dimensions each 3rd dimensional slice is the boundary which contains our energy. If we move along that 4th dimensional line should not each frame contain a consistent amount of energy? Furthermore, if it does not then at the point at which an event occurs there must presumably be some transfer of energy across 4th dimensional timelines. Does this mean energy, like gravity, effects multiple dimensions?
@sonnydey I agree ... If we observe the expansion according to how you see the 10 dimensions each 3rd dimensional slice is the boundary which contains our energy. If we move along that 4th dimensional line should not each frame contain a consistent amount of energy? Furthermore, if it does not then at the point at which an event occurs there must presumably be some transfer of energy across 4th dimensional timelines. Does this mean energy, like gravity, effects multiple dimensions?
What's your view on the recent news that CERN scientists claim to have discovered particles faster than light, which would undermine Einstein's theory of special relativity?
that's what "dark energy" was supposed to be; the explanation for this change in energy of the particles w/in the space. however, the change in energy of radiation in that expanding space accounts for the expansion of that space; it is entirely entropic. dU = TdS - PdV; the change in the internal energy is equal to the change in entropy times the temperature minus the pressure times the change in volume. in other words, as space expands, radiation wavelengths increase and lose energy.
Hey i'm just wondering what you think about the new discovery of neutrinos moving faster than light speed and how, if true, it may prove that the fifth dimension exists. This is a very interesting discovery and due to it I believe this theory is going to become much more mainstream in the not so distant future.
On a large scale such as the whole universe, it may be that energy is not conserved, but in a closed system the law of conservation of energy should still uphold... right?
@raidera3 Yes, that's true in a closed system. I think this guy is wrong because as SloganLogan said above in the comments there's energy being exerted by the expansion of the universe which is being used up. I don't know about the physics he's referring too but at the very least there is plenty of matter and energy we don't see. Even virtual particles which are supposed to be a prime example of getting something out of nothing equalize to a net gain of 0 new energy.
@RuinSonic The problem which he's getting at is the closed system... If we move across dimensions.. (ie a 5th dimensional probability space caused naturally as our 4th dimensional timeline propagates) does this new space contain the same energy as the 4th dimensional line which carried us to that point? Or is this energy somehow transferred into other timeless unevenly? Think of a branch where energy is distributed. Its conserved as a sum, however each "universe" has a different total.
So what do you think about the neutrinos going faster than the speed of light? To me it only means that light isn't the fastest thing, it isn't the speed of time.
make a video weakly
thewindtheend 4 months ago
Question... How does the expansion of our universe result in an increase of energy? Based on the Law of Conservational energy one would come to the conclusion that the volume is simply increase resulting a "less dense" universe. However what this idea proposes is that dark energy is somehow converted into our universe and imbalances its naturual state. The question then becomes... by what means is this conversion possible?
digitalink2001 5 months ago
Thanks for the link to your vid, Flow... very relevant to the stage in life I'm going through
MaximusDisplay 5 months ago
I would say that in our 3D world it only looks like energy is NOT conserved when it comes to general relativity, that's because space-time is not only in 3D but time is 4D.
So you would have to look at that problem in 4D way and I bet you would find that energy is conserved in 4D.
If in our 3D world with general relativity energy seems to be lost, it's because in 4D it's gained by the same amount.
sonnydey 5 months ago
@sonnydey I agree with someday.. If we observe the expansion according to how you see the 10 dimensions each 3rd dimensional slice is the boundary which contains our energy. If we move along that 4th dimensional line should not each frame contain a consistent amount of energy? Furthermore, if it does not then at the point at which an event occurs there must presumably be some transfer of energy across 4th dimensional timelines. Does this mean energy, like gravity, effects multiple dimensions?
digitalink2001 5 months ago
@sonnydey I agree ... If we observe the expansion according to how you see the 10 dimensions each 3rd dimensional slice is the boundary which contains our energy. If we move along that 4th dimensional line should not each frame contain a consistent amount of energy? Furthermore, if it does not then at the point at which an event occurs there must presumably be some transfer of energy across 4th dimensional timelines. Does this mean energy, like gravity, effects multiple dimensions?
digitalink2001 5 months ago
@sonnydey I agree ... If we observe the expansion according to how you see the 10 dimensions each 3rd dimensional slice is the boundary which contains our energy. If we move along that 4th dimensional line should not each frame contain a consistent amount of energy? Furthermore, if it does not then at the point at which an event occurs there must presumably be some transfer of energy across 4th dimensional timelines. Does this mean energy, like gravity, effects multiple dimensions?
digitalink2001 5 months ago
What's your view on the recent news that CERN scientists claim to have discovered particles faster than light, which would undermine Einstein's theory of special relativity?
mirandansa 5 months ago
@mirandansa Go to my channel comments for my take on this. Thanks!
10thdim 5 months ago
@10thdim where is that?
valsotto27 4 months ago
took your sweet time bringing this video out Rob
IriquoisPliskinn 5 months ago
what happened at 3:12?
023132 5 months ago
We start with a joint.
SummerKingdom 5 months ago 6
OMG I MISS THIS SHOW!
Aliceinchainhead 5 months ago 2
that's what "dark energy" was supposed to be; the explanation for this change in energy of the particles w/in the space. however, the change in energy of radiation in that expanding space accounts for the expansion of that space; it is entirely entropic. dU = TdS - PdV; the change in the internal energy is equal to the change in entropy times the temperature minus the pressure times the change in volume. in other words, as space expands, radiation wavelengths increase and lose energy.
SloganLogan 5 months ago
He pronounced "joint" wrong.
amazingmazinger 5 months ago
Hey i'm just wondering what you think about the new discovery of neutrinos moving faster than light speed and how, if true, it may prove that the fifth dimension exists. This is a very interesting discovery and due to it I believe this theory is going to become much more mainstream in the not so distant future.
DirtyAtreyu 5 months ago
make video about neutrino!
frageee 5 months ago 22
Hi, Rob. I am just wondering, when did you become really interested in physics?
Gytax0 5 months ago
On a large scale such as the whole universe, it may be that energy is not conserved, but in a closed system the law of conservation of energy should still uphold... right?
raidera3 5 months ago
@raidera3 Yes, that's true in a closed system. I think this guy is wrong because as SloganLogan said above in the comments there's energy being exerted by the expansion of the universe which is being used up. I don't know about the physics he's referring too but at the very least there is plenty of matter and energy we don't see. Even virtual particles which are supposed to be a prime example of getting something out of nothing equalize to a net gain of 0 new energy.
RuinSonic 5 months ago
@RuinSonic The problem which he's getting at is the closed system... If we move across dimensions.. (ie a 5th dimensional probability space caused naturally as our 4th dimensional timeline propagates) does this new space contain the same energy as the 4th dimensional line which carried us to that point? Or is this energy somehow transferred into other timeless unevenly? Think of a branch where energy is distributed. Its conserved as a sum, however each "universe" has a different total.
digitalink2001 5 months ago
i should watch through the worm hole again.
thanks rob
defect530 5 months ago
So what do you think about the neutrinos going faster than the speed of light? To me it only means that light isn't the fastest thing, it isn't the speed of time.
Nate2203 5 months ago
YES! a new 10thdim video!!
tunateun 5 months ago 16
Great video, as always. I really enjoyed it.
coldfire2143 5 months ago