@muckletoon no offense, but your wasting your life pretending to understand something you don't. by the way, take a physics class. dont reiterate some dumb shit you see on the internet.
no planes...no hijackers..no victims...just a non-stop supply of bullshit propaganda spoonfed to a public who can't be bothered get off their fat asses and try any good old fashioned research
@cartoonplanes Very interesting. What hard research have you done so far. Have spoken with any of the witness's, any air traffic controllers on the day?
@nb45001 is wierd, because the airplane did not explode at first impact, another strange fact is , shoudnt the people from the buiding be warned aboult the incoming airplane.?
@mariamole011 people thought that the first plane crash was an accident, so why would they think a second one was coming, and how would you even warn people inside the other building in time by the time they saw another plane coming. and planes dont explode on impact, it isnt the movies. A plane has hollow space on the inside, same as a building, thus it wont explode like it is hitting a completely solid object.
@koiter20 airplanes do explode like the one you saw in the video, i think, what do you think that airplane was ? i dont beliave the government was behind this atack, but i suspect they knew it could hapen, but didnt do any thing aboult that ,since they need a strong reason to go to a war .
@mariamole011 yes the government most likely could have done something but they want war so they could get money and oil, for me its a 50-50 thing, a part of me thinks it was an inside job and another thing says it is what it is.
@koiter20 yes , it could have been an inside jo, but is unlicly, it could have been also some kind of mistake, or warrning some thing that went wrong, . terrible wrong.
So tell me this, if this was all a government consiracy, and flight 11 and United 175 actually missles or whatever you think them to be. What in gods name happened to all the people who were on those flights who died on impact? They never exist or what?
@Dazeddirtydog i am not saying the video. but the passenger talking to their family aboult the airplane being hijacked. they phoned parents and family meber and sent texts. before the airplane hit the towers.
@lmfecher Is a parked car rooted to the floor with foundations? Likely hood of both cars being the same size? (or near enough). Not the same as a plan smashing into something about 100x as big. Stop it with the pseudo Physicist shite mate.
"is a parked car rooted to the floor with foundations"....
No, but both WTC towers had 47 core columns embedded in granite, even more stable than a parked car. Show me any video of UA 175 crashing & exploding AGAINST the OUTER steel framed wall of WTC 2
@lmfecher Show me a video where crashing into a parked car doesn't involve the said car moving with the car that's crashing into it. That's my point. Don't try to act like a Scientist when you quite clearly aren't!
is it just me or did anyone else see a shockwave at the back of the inpact area.does avgas do this?i thought the differance between low and high explosives was the shockwave.
See if you watch heaps of videos on youtube, you will not see one one video of anyone say 'another plane flew into the tower'. Every single video you see of the second 'plane' hitting the tower, the filmer says 'the buildings exploding!'
there is always fools who think every thing is staged. You are never going to change there thinking because they are brainwashed by all the subversives in our society. They had many programs on the world trade center and it makes sense aircraft did it and were hyjacked
9/11 was done by criminal elements of the US and israeli governments, not muslims, to get the people to support wars for oil and opium in a desperate attempt to reverse the crumbing US economy, weak dollar, overpopulation and lack of oil. Its very blatant and the whole world knows it, its a shame that some people arent overly concerned about this. It will happen again, only worse, these criminals will think nothing of slaughtering their own citizens for personal and financial gain!!!
damn the begining of this video blew my mind away, i never seen that video before, if anybody haves the link to the 1st plane crashing on the runway please send it to me?
Never trust the media. Im not saying that planes didnt hit them, the point is that i dont see the fuel doing this. The same week all this occured i had cancelled a vacation there, so tell me anyone.... What is the September Clue?
So, the incompetent Bush Admin got 3 commercial airliners to disappear and the hundreds of people aboard, explosives installed in a few very busy buildings and yet could not muster sneaking 15 lbs of uranium or 8 gallons of mustard gas into Iraq in 7 years?
9/11 was an inside job for about 70 reasons, 1 reason alone can be considered coincidence, 2 is suspicious, 3 is inside job, 4 is a blatant inside job, but 70??? conspiracies happen, this was one of them, mass murder for personal gain! Oil, opium and bases in the middle east, better to take from the weak before other superpowers (russia, china) do! We may benefit in the long run when we fill up our cars, but it doesn't make 9.11 ok! Mass murder! the shills will attack me but i don't care!
@everybody im very confused. I think that theres something very wrong with 911 but i dont know whats true, speculation or fake??!! Can some americans or new yorkers tell me what they think happened. Is it possible that there were no planes?? I saw "september clues", but that can also be fake. So i dont know what to think. I d appreciate it if some of you just told me what you think. Thx in advance.
@Richards1796 I was talking about the plane (?) wings before impact, it is the same shot here at 00:42 and in the other video at about 00:26, it is from Gamma Press, stop video and look carefully to plane wings, do you see some differences?
okay people, consider this: the buildings are made of metal, true, but they aren't dense with metal in a complete solid surface. the plane hit the building and broke the thin metal beams between windows, once inside the building, it's just open space! that's why the plane entered the building without any resistance.
I agree wings are in wrong direction. Plane has no vertical upright stabilizer. Plane almost appears to be flying upside down. Also it is coming in from the wrong angle to the building to exit on that side of the building. Compare the angle of plane a 00:42 to to clip right before that one, where the plane hits from a more appropriate angle, but it looks fake too, especially as it comes out the other side.
@retiredaxmurderer finally,I tought I was going mad.Now please watch this video,is the same GammaPress shot,but now wings look in the right direction (like at 00:26)!At least for me:
you Americans claim to be the police of the world and try to convince yourselves that you 'liberate' every 'oppressed' nation yet you allowed THIS to go unpunished and unquestioned and am yet to see BUSH PAY FOR HIS CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
bottom line a plane that size crashing into a building that size would not cause that kind of damage even if the plane exploded on impact and why did the building fall str8 down like a planned demo
>FACT: NO commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
>implying that your all knowing and all seeing. and that you were there just like the frenchmen that were filming the first plane hit the first tower. because it was the french and not the sand niggers that flew the planes into the tower. this is MY consparisy theroy. hurrrr durrrr
Aluminum plane with 20,000 gallons of jet fuel. Steal melts at 2000 F into liquid form. The softer steal inside the building could never hold the 100s of tons of the upper floors. the first plane was only going 87 knots (97 MPH) while the plane in the world trade center was at maximum speep (570 MPH). That isn't even relevant.
How a hollow aluminium tube weighing 80 metric tons can carve it's way straight through hundreds of tons worth of a solid concrete and steel, and then appear to make it out the other side before disintegrating, and THEN exploding all over the place completely defies logic, physics, and anything else you can come up with.
Comparing a slow landing crash into an impenetrable surface (runway) cannot be held the same as a high speed crash into a forgiving building. I would assume that a plane traveling @ 600 mph would puncture a steel building pretty good. The only other plane to hit a building was a B-25 bomber in 1945 and it flew into the Empire State Bldg. It left a hole and ended up inside of it. The Empire State is sturdier than the WTC and a plane made it into it @1/2 of the speed of 9-11 jets.
The aeroplane would tear itself apart flying 600mph at sea level, another hallmark that the object seen in these videos representing a real boeing, is fake or has been manipulated.
FACT: A 767 cannot fly 500mph at 800ft because of air density and structural integrity.
FACT: The tail section of the B-25 bomber that struck the Empire State Building was stuck in the outer wall of the building and could be seen from the street. It did NOT end up inside it.
FACT: WTC 1 & 2 were an engineering feat that could withstand hurricane force winds and MULTIPLE airliner hits.
FACT: NO commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
Get into your car, Skippy. Now drive your car as fast as it will go and without braking, RAM it into a parked car. Tell me fucktard, how far THROUGH that parked car did you travel?
@thatswhattheyis R U FUCKING MENTAL??,,,,,,,,HAHAHAHAHAHA,,,,,,,,,A FORGIVING BUILDING,,,,,,,,,,,,WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKIN ABOUT STUPID,,,,,,,,YOU BETTER SNAP OUTTA FUCKIN DREAM MORON,,,,,,,,THE WORLD TRADE CENTER TOWERS WERE BUILT STRONGER THAN ANY OTHER BUILDINGS IN THE WORLD,,,,,,,,,,THEY WERE A TUBE IN TUBE STRUCTURE,,,,,,,,WITH MASSIVE STEEL GIRDERS,,,,,,,,WHEN YOU WATCH THE PLANE HIT THE IMPACT WALL,,,,,,,NEITHER THE PLANE ,,,,NOR THE BUILDING REACT,,,,,,,THIS IS HOW WE KNOW IT'S FAKE
any "real" plane would explode ON contact with the wtc sending debris hurtling in all directions,it certainly wouldn't slice through the steel outer walls and concrete floors with such force that the nose cone would continue on and slice its way out through the opposite steel walls while at the same time keeping its fragile aluminium wing tips & tail-section intact.
i fear the perps may never face justice as long as the guilty media protect the official "bullshit" conspiracy theory
@muckletoon there was one local news clip thats on here somewhere that shows pieces of jet in someones yrd a mile from the sopposed crash site..it was only shown once
Bah ha ha ha ha! Stupid fuck. A beer can huh. A 200,000 pound beer can, going 500 mph would split through that buildings CONCRETE exterior like a hot knife through butter, which it did. Saying that the towers were jet impact proof is like saying that the Titanic was unsinkable. It's all bullshit. Birds give problems when they fly into the engine, which is to be expected idiot. The plane in the beginning of this foolish video was landing at probably 150 mph and not even comparable. Douche.
yes, and the planes in the fake 911 videos are travelling 500mph+ according to NIST, which is impossible for a commercial aeroplane, the G-force would tear it apart.
@nwow2866 you sounded stupid when you say a plane flying at 500mph.. but seriously at almost sea level? thats impossible, no place can fly at that speed it would tear apart before even reaching new york if it was flying at that speed, and you should see the damage a bird can do to the front of the plane, they literally destroy it.
so fake... so the planes that left with flight manifests from airports that never arrived at their destinations just magically disappeared... yeah right...
@muckletoon Oh yes im a fool? How did the TWC fall magical fairies? Those men who hijacked the planes where are they? Oh! Thats right them, bin Laden, and Tupac are kickin it in Cuba!
what's the TWC? It's fairly obvious to grown adults the world trade centre was pulverised by explosives, how else can you account for it turning to fine dust in 12 seconds?
No. I am not having it. The way these things were made and designed, i mean come on! Lets face it , the planes had no chance, 200tonnes of aircraft against those uprights, or rather the skeleton, sliced up the planes. The fuel is another case but in my experience fuel just burns.
Look... There is no way that the collapse was caused by planes. These people who are doing this are fucking serious guys. They've managed to manipulate and since then get everyone caught up in the further "Hi-Jacking" with the collapse of the banking system.. this was rolled out a long time ago folks and it aint over yet. There is a real prob here because this place was the centre of all the business dealings of the western corporations at that time.. this worked for them. Sure did!
@hommedespoir u ask how the illusion was done wantingto believe there was an illusion? did 2 million new yorkers imagine the 2nd plane. did every camera from every news media work together to take FAKE images? u r an idiot if u think it wasnt real. One of my best friends was in Brooklyn acros the river and watched the 2nd plane go in. did he and 2 million others share some kind of hallucination? what about the 200 or so passengers that never came home? say they didnt exist to their families!!!
It's amazing how according to this guy every single video that was taken by bystanders is fake. How could every single one of these videos be faked? Why do people have to find faults in every single thing, especially in something as sensitive as this?
@Whatever174 Anyone who believes "Wikileaks" is anything other than an elaborately staged attempt by many powerful governments to give the (false) impression to "the people" that they (the govts) are opposing/conflicting with each other is deluded - precisely the effect intended when "Wikileaks" was set up. Give the people some evidence of unimportant, minor ways in which govts disagree and criticise each other, so that the govts can get on with the MAJOR ways in which they collaborate. Clever.
@NellJSmith ...That's why "Wikileaks" has only contained trivial "revelations" which, although at first seeming to show "morally wrong" behaviour on the part of governments, when closely examined, tend actually to make govts look GOOD rather than BAD (e.g. covertly spying on other nations... well, that's a good idea, isn't it, meaning that our govts are on their toes, right?! Trusting nobody completely? Good idea! And so on)...where are any TRULY damaging "revelations"? Let alone 9/11 truth! HA!
@hommedespoir the important question is how was it done? I think the most important is it was an inside job and why was it done such a show as u call it. even though we all know the answer or should know.
the reason theres so little smoke and explosion was because it was going so fast..think of it this way if u take a .50cal bullet made of brass bullet much weaker softer metal than steel and fire it at 2 inches of steel its going so fast it will punch a hole no problem...in the video you can obviously see the entry point of the plane
Watch a Pre-January 8th copy of Inception. Listen closely when the actors say imagine, reality, safe, and envelope, or point pistols. You'll hear the words, Loughner, offin' her, part of the word Giffords, and much more. Some even say they hear, do it.
@hommedespoir The man that made this video 77 rippel effect was extradited from Ireland to face trial in the UK for sending copies to a court, he is up on the 9th May 2011 in Newark crown court, I met Antony John Hill whilst he was living here in Ireland and went to his appeal against extradition here in Dublin. The government want to nail his arse for making this video.
but there is a threat,....don’t take your eye off the ball, the threat of nazi islam on the streets of the UK, is real ! i live in a norhtern town, 50%+ muslim population, mosques being built every 1km, colonisation of the UK is real, indigenous people being suppressed by the UN, making it illegal to challange islam, islam is not a religion, it’s a cult, a cult of hate, 1930s the Nazis indoctrinated and brainwashed the young, islam does exactly the same, a warning from history, EDL NS
@DRaCuLACod4 means its not a plane. really ask ur self..would a plane completely disappears into a building and then explode? .....wait, wait..i know i know..the buildings were made of entire glass. ..yeah.
How many of you know that Barbara Bush & Ann Cappelletti are illegitimate daughters of aleister Crowley, conceived with sex magick (tantra) with their mothers, Pauline Pierce and Ann's mother, one of many 20 yr old Sicilian girls lured to Abbey of Thelema to have se magick w Crowley to procreate the antichrist. 911 was a huge illusion and mega ritual perpetrated to steal $trillion from U.S. taxpayers & insurance companies in fraud. No planes, only suggestions of planes by paid planted liars.
@074August AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! sex magick? i also love how you included the gaelic word for love in there. what jacked up priest yelled this as he emptied his balls onto your face? you must be completely fucking retarded. if you honestly believe this the re read your bible. it states that your anti christ will be conceived of a normal man and womans coupling's. not with "sex magick'. you fucking downie.
You cannot compare some magic show to 9/11. That's comparing apples to oranges, they're not the same at all. Audio or no audio. People still saw planes go into all three. What's the explanation for them seeing it with their own eyes?
So you the WTC should have immediately crumbled once the planes hit? And all the witnesses who SAW the plane hit? I'm guessing they're lying to cover it up too?
So was the WTC? I don't understand you point, brother. There are pictures of several windows being broken, even fires coming out of some. The "unidentified military plane" was a C130, which NORAD I believe saw was in the area of UA175 and asked if he had a visual on it, which he did. No way UA175 could of flown. Ever realize how many planes there really are? Too many. Could easily have been a mistake. FBI and the government don't have to release anything to regular guys like you
ADHD? Haha. Sorry, I have no such thing. Do you mean why did the Pentagon still stand after the plane hit? I wouldn't know, I'm not a structural engineer. I'm guessing because of the way it was built. No, you don't often read of that, but you also need to realize there is only ONE Pentagon. There were definitely broken windows dude. Also, how come not ONE witness recalls a plane flying RIGHT over the Pentagon after the crash? Hmm?
look at the speed that plane was going. it would take a second for pysics to react to the speed it was going anyways. and the wings wouldnt have blown up until they hit something anyways. and at the rate of speed the plane was going the wings would have started to explode as they were entering the building and that is when the explosion happens. you conspiritors make me sick. use common knowledge for once
@porscheowner6 "look at the speed that plane was going" - The speeds the planes were going is an interesting thing to mention since the official version has speeds that are higher than the maximum speeds of structural statbility for these aircraft at that low altitude where air density is high. Pilots for 911 Truth brings up this fact (many are real world Boeing B767 pilots). Their initial attempts to even hit these buildings at those speeds using multi-million $ simulators failed.
part2... Pilots (many ex-military & commercial B757 pilot) say the manuevers to hit the Pentagon were virtually impossible even for seasoned large airliner pilots. The idea that pathetic failed single-prop Cessna "non-pilot" *terrorists* could suddenly become more skilled than seasoned airliner pilots is unreaslistic. It's hard to believe *terrorists* could manage to hit the WTC buildings let alone the Pentagon. 'Remote-control' (guided to certain floors) or CGI planes seems more reasonable.
@Steelerguy6178 You are the typical America basher. You pay too much attention to shit you know nothing about because your own country sucks so much. The planes were going extremely fast that is a fact.
@ov3chtr1ck nobody has seen a plane goes into the pentagon, btw search about project blue beam and holographic tehcnology, if you want a link on holographic demonstration just ask :)
Actually, plenty of people have seen a plane go into the Pentagon, too. Just cause there isn't such detailed videos like the ones in New York doesn't mean it didn't happen. Plenty of people have given testimony of how they heard it, felt it, even books shook off their bookshelves. Some people even SAW it hit.
@ov3chtr1ck there has been investigations that shows something hit the pentagon but not a plane. They based that on that the damage (hole in the wall) was to small to be a plane + there was nothing left from the plane, it was suddenly gone (sry for my english)
No, investigations have been done and it concludes a plane hit the Pentagon. People saw it and heard it. Also, there were TONS of debris' over the lawn. What are you even talking about?
600 Muslim died in twin towers, 1,100 those killed in twin towers were foreign nationals. 9/11 hijackers were scapegoat. 9/11 was inside job as a excuse to take over Middle East oil.click Justice party UK.
With the second wtc crash, I would guess that the plane went inside the building and the fuel exploded when it was inside. To me, my guess seems more logical than this video :/ but seriously, 9/11 should be left at rest and conspiracies should not be made. What's done is done, Just think of the families of the people that dies in that building :/
@mpc1209 Those families ARE the reason you SHOULD want to find out what happened that day. Not saying any conspiracy is true.. But I don't believe in terrorism. I simply don't think the terrorism as the US government adcovates it actually exists.
@dirtyyyminds Not quite a hot knife through butter. The nose makes the initial impact with the building, so the force is confined to a small surface area.
@dirtyyyminds The plane is traveling like 500 mph....the faster the velocity, the greater the impact. After a tornado, people have found hay stuck in light poles
There are two questions here on this video ( and we have to be honest with ourselves whether we're conspiracy nuts or not )
1st Question:
On 0:27 to 0:28; why did a flash or puff occur located on the very bottom right of the facade facing WTC1? The flash coincidentally occurred during the "plane collision".
2nd Question:
Notice frames 0:41 to 0:42. Why was the right wing of the Boeing missing before impact on a bright and sunny day?
@saltydog78 I can not see either things you are highlighting. When I pause it at 0:41, I can clearly see both wings of the plane. Perhaps I'm looking at the wrong thing? Please elaborate? :) Cheers
256 people can't tell the difference between special effects more suited to a Harry Potter film compared to what happens in real life when vehicles collide with a stationary object....
Bigbopper, the only people lying around here are you disgusting truthers who spread absolute lies, lies that fool other ignorant individuals such as yourself! I can't believe anyone is dumb enough to believe those planes weren't real and didn't hit the buildings, you absolutely HAVE to have a learning disability if you believe such an idiotic lie. You are a disgusting individual who does dishonor those who lost their lives that day.
@youstupidmoron Well it's an amazing phenomenon that so many people believe 9/11 was an inside job. It makes you wonder what other lies millions of people would believe if enough effort was put into telling them. It seems you have a good point about people being stupid and believing a massive lie. Maybe the offical version of 9/11 is one massive lie?
alright, prove it. fly a 747 into a skyscraper at, i dunno 550 miles per hour, and show me what comes first, impact or fireball. something traveling that fast isn't gonna bounce off the side of the building or crumple like a soda can. people that say no planes crashed into the towers discredit and dishonor the lives taken that day. shame on you.
@bumwrecker27 discredit and dishonour the dead,,,,,,,,fuck you asshole,,,,,,,get the fuck out of my face with that bullshit,,,,,,,,550 miles an hour?,,,,,,,,if you knew your head from your ass,,,,,,,,,you would know that those speeds are unattainable by a 767 at 700 feet altitude,,,,,,,,,they lied to you,,,,,,,fema lied to you,,,,,,,,the government lied to you,,,,,,,wake the fuck up you moron!
@bigbopper993 this is how conspiracy theorists do it. first, they act really offended and choose to offend someone. second, they try to give you a physics lesson. third, they tell you everyone lied to you (i wouldn't doubt they lied to me, they still do it TODAY), fourth, they tell you to wake up, even though they can't prove a fraction of circumstantial evidence.
i know elements inside the US government allowed this to happen. i also know a cruise missile couldn't leave the clean imprint
@muckletoon ur argument is convincing a lot of people, dude. i suppose the terrorists just painted a black spot on the tower and the 'hologram' flew right through, too? if we're in a cartoon world, we've gotta consider all the possibilities. remember, it's not just aluminum on a plane. one wouldn't be able to get off the ground at 160 mph if that were the case. carbon fiber, electrical components, jet turbines, rubber wheels, human bodies, etc. think about that
@bigbopper993 of its 'hologram' in the side of a building. explain how the fireball we see exits the other side of the tower at a dampened velocity on the same vector as this 'hologram.' cruise missiles don't blow up air on the other side of their target. explain the roars of jet turbines thousands of people heard. cruise missiles don't make that much noise, and espeically not that specific noise while in flight (unless this hologram had speakers). i'm not the moron, you need to wake up
@bigbopper993 Those speeds are NOT unattainable, they are just extremely dangerous. They test planes at those altitudes and speeds before they are put into production to see if they can handle the stress. I'm a pilot, I know a few things (not to be rude).
@bigbopper993 im still waiting for an explanation for some of the topics i presented. a logical/rational explanation, not you calling me an asshole or a fuckstick or a moron, but an actual explanation. i don't give you shit for believing what you believe, i don't give you shit for being a horrible comedian or having a fat ass, and i research my shit before i post it. ps: i wasn't in YOUR face waving bullshit until YOU started talking.
@Psy0psAgent The WTC towers were surfaced with a thin aluminum sheeting. the exoskeleton of the towers was a grid of 13X13 inch steel columns which were placed 18 inch apart. At the base of the towers these columns were approximately 2.5 inches thick and gradually thinning out toward the top. At floor 80, the columns were approximately 1/2 inch thick at the very most. The columns were NOT full steel, they were hollowed out columns.
@Psy0psAgent The towers were surfaced with a thin aluminum sheeting. the exoskeleton of the towers was a grid of 13X13 inch steel columns which were placed 18 inch apart. At the base of the towers these columns were approximately 2.5 inches thick and gradually thinning out toward the top. At floor 80, the columns were approximately 1/2 inch thick at the very most. The columns were NOT full steel, they were hollowed out columns. do some research next time.
@Psy0psAgent The towers were surfaced with a thin aluminum sheeting. the exoskeleton of the towers was a grid of 13X13 inch steel columns which were placed 18 inch apart. At the base of the towers these columns were approximately 2.5 inches thick and gradually thinning out toward the top. At floor 80, the columns were approximately 1/2 inch thick at the very most. The columns were NOT full steel, they were hollowed out columns
@Psy0psAgent i couldn't post what i was trying to, so i'm just gonna say it. the towers were not made completely out of steel. it was a 13x13 inch grid spread 18 inches apart. at the base of the towers, the columns were 2 and a half inches thick and continued to thin out to the top of the tower. at the impact zone, the columns were maybe a half inch thick. the video you linked me to shows a fighter jet flying into a slab of concrete ten feet thick. it isn't the same as 9/11.
@bumwrecker27 Oh please. I got the blueprints, get lost. I worked concrete for 15 years. Concrete does not powder. Physics is the same in the entire universe. The aluminum plane would tear apart at that altitude & speed. The wind on the buildings did more on a constant basis than a silly wile e coyote plane. Gimme a break with this shill crap. Go attack Blueprint for Truth or September Clues. My freakin dog tags wont melt in jet fuel freak. THERE ARE NO FAMILIES OF PASSENGERS. NONE. Get lost.
@Psy0psAgent i see what ur tryna say but...but...as ur references shows, there were still dust and smoke and fire as it was going in there..it didn't went all the way in and then just explode..the bitch is fooling you with "disappeared" it didn't. basically.
@splendid1000 yo why ya'l always wait mad long to comment son, im too lazy to search through all these comments to see what i've said. but lemme try to answer that..
...well i can't answer that, cuz i don't remember what i said haha...i just noticed one more thing...didn't the news broadcast about an American Airlines and a United Airways going into the buildings...well it just hit me ppl...
even though those shots of the plane can been seen from multiple angels not one shows the planes colors
projeto blue beam
lexlutor500 17 hours ago
@koiter20
These two? watch?v = jAzzHjLYjuA
muckletoon 19 hours ago
@koiter20
You mean these two people? watch ?v=jAzzHjLYjuA
muckletoon 19 hours ago
@koiter20
You mean these two people? watch?v=jAzzHjLYjuA
muckletoon 19 hours ago
That's right, everybody. That is not a 767-200ER. it is clearly some of gods sperm.
panzlock 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@muckletoon no offense, but your wasting your life pretending to understand something you don't. by the way, take a physics class. dont reiterate some dumb shit you see on the internet.
shadowseries 1 month ago
@michiman57
The hologram meme is firm evidence you're a lousy troll, all the money shots of the plane hitting the WTC are faker than you.
muckletoon 2 months ago
Comment removed
MegaYeshua33 1 month ago
Gj Bro.
xNAJAFx 4 months ago
no planes...no hijackers..no victims...just a non-stop supply of bullshit propaganda spoonfed to a public who can't be bothered get off their fat asses and try any good old fashioned research
cartoonplanes 4 months ago
@cartoonplanes Very interesting. What hard research have you done so far. Have spoken with any of the witness's, any air traffic controllers on the day?
MegaYeshua33 1 month ago
i beleive 911 was an inside job but i still think there was a plane
nb45001 4 months ago
@nb45001 is wierd, because the airplane did not explode at first impact, another strange fact is , shoudnt the people from the buiding be warned aboult the incoming airplane.?
mariamole011 3 months ago
@mariamole011 maybe the plane came so fast or it just took them by suprise?
nb45001 3 months ago
@mariamole011 people thought that the first plane crash was an accident, so why would they think a second one was coming, and how would you even warn people inside the other building in time by the time they saw another plane coming. and planes dont explode on impact, it isnt the movies. A plane has hollow space on the inside, same as a building, thus it wont explode like it is hitting a completely solid object.
koiter20 21 hours ago
@koiter20 airplanes do explode like the one you saw in the video, i think, what do you think that airplane was ? i dont beliave the government was behind this atack, but i suspect they knew it could hapen, but didnt do any thing aboult that ,since they need a strong reason to go to a war .
mariamole011 20 hours ago
@mariamole011 yes the government most likely could have done something but they want war so they could get money and oil, for me its a 50-50 thing, a part of me thinks it was an inside job and another thing says it is what it is.
koiter20 16 hours ago
@koiter20 yes , it could have been an inside jo, but is unlicly, it could have been also some kind of mistake, or warrning some thing that went wrong, . terrible wrong.
we may never know the real truth
mariamole011 10 hours ago
@koiter20
Hence the impact videos defy the simple laws of physics, thus are artificial.
muckletoon 19 hours ago
no fue un atentado,,,,,,,fue papa pitufo
putosantiyankis 4 months ago
@SuperIlluminater I agree prob just CGI
ukweatherunderground 4 months ago in playlist More videos from muckletoon 3
So tell me this, if this was all a government consiracy, and flight 11 and United 175 actually missles or whatever you think them to be. What in gods name happened to all the people who were on those flights who died on impact? They never exist or what?
nascar9and88 4 months ago
@nascar9and88 good question, what aboult the recording of the mobile phones the passenger were carring.?
mariamole011 3 months ago
@mariamole011 Did you have a celphone that recorded video in 2001? I highly doubt it.
Dazeddirtydog 3 months ago
@Dazeddirtydog i am not saying the video. but the passenger talking to their family aboult the airplane being hijacked. they phoned parents and family meber and sent texts. before the airplane hit the towers.
mariamole011 3 months ago
@ctommonufc
And you're a fool if you think commercial airliners can fly through steel framed buildings. Obviously you flunked physics, too.
Go back to sleep, Skippy.
lmfecher 4 months ago 2
@lmfecher Yoiu just compared the 9/11 incident to crashing into a parked car. Who's the fuck wit?
ctommonufc 4 months ago 3
@ctommonufc
It's the same principal, Skippy. It's called Newton's Laws. Ever heard of 'em?
lmfecher 4 months ago
@lmfecher Is a parked car rooted to the floor with foundations? Likely hood of both cars being the same size? (or near enough). Not the same as a plan smashing into something about 100x as big. Stop it with the pseudo Physicist shite mate.
ctommonufc 4 months ago
@ctommonufc
"is a parked car rooted to the floor with foundations"....
No, but both WTC towers had 47 core columns embedded in granite, even more stable than a parked car. Show me any video of UA 175 crashing & exploding AGAINST the OUTER steel framed wall of WTC 2
lmfecher 4 months ago
@lmfecher Show me a video where crashing into a parked car doesn't involve the said car moving with the car that's crashing into it. That's my point. Don't try to act like a Scientist when you quite clearly aren't!
ctommonufc 4 months ago
@umhalil Yeah, everyone knows that it was Alex Mason who killed Kennedy.
RepentForTheSinner 5 months ago
no plane ist was a bomb like wtc 7 5 4 a the twin towers the pentagon was a uav
SkriLLexV1 5 months ago
is it just me or did anyone else see a shockwave at the back of the inpact area.does avgas do this?i thought the differance between low and high explosives was the shockwave.
phycohogbeast 5 months ago
See if you watch heaps of videos on youtube, you will not see one one video of anyone say 'another plane flew into the tower'. Every single video you see of the second 'plane' hitting the tower, the filmer says 'the buildings exploding!'
ShRiNkInGMuShRoOmS 5 months ago
how about finding the passports in all that mess...right off the bat ...what are the chances of that .. FUCKING ZERO thats the chances of that!
MERCURHILLMANIAC 5 months ago
there is always fools who think every thing is staged. You are never going to change there thinking because they are brainwashed by all the subversives in our society. They had many programs on the world trade center and it makes sense aircraft did it and were hyjacked
Olddog231 5 months ago
9/11 was done by criminal elements of the US and israeli governments, not muslims, to get the people to support wars for oil and opium in a desperate attempt to reverse the crumbing US economy, weak dollar, overpopulation and lack of oil. Its very blatant and the whole world knows it, its a shame that some people arent overly concerned about this. It will happen again, only worse, these criminals will think nothing of slaughtering their own citizens for personal and financial gain!!!
wellifthemediasaysit 5 months ago
project blue beam
RumuhAlg 5 months ago
Our Government is responsible for killing 3,000 of our own people.. that's so fucked up..
Ostnizdasht206 5 months ago
damn the begining of this video blew my mind away, i never seen that video before, if anybody haves the link to the 1st plane crashing on the runway please send it to me?
T3kozRockz 6 months ago
Bush, according to just about everyone on the face of the earth is brainless but somehow managed to pull this off. Great thinking there!
Mynamesnigel 6 months ago
Never trust the media. Im not saying that planes didnt hit them, the point is that i dont see the fuel doing this. The same week all this occured i had cancelled a vacation there, so tell me anyone.... What is the September Clue?
MrTinylight 6 months ago
So, the incompetent Bush Admin got 3 commercial airliners to disappear and the hundreds of people aboard, explosives installed in a few very busy buildings and yet could not muster sneaking 15 lbs of uranium or 8 gallons of mustard gas into Iraq in 7 years?
thatswhattheyis 6 months ago
@thatswhattheyis
The Bush Admin pulled off two unwanted wars.
Not as incompetent as you might insist we say they were...
socratescafe 5 months ago
9/11 was an inside job for about 70 reasons, 1 reason alone can be considered coincidence, 2 is suspicious, 3 is inside job, 4 is a blatant inside job, but 70??? conspiracies happen, this was one of them, mass murder for personal gain! Oil, opium and bases in the middle east, better to take from the weak before other superpowers (russia, china) do! We may benefit in the long run when we fill up our cars, but it doesn't make 9.11 ok! Mass murder! the shills will attack me but i don't care!
wellifthemediasaysit 6 months ago
@everybody im very confused. I think that theres something very wrong with 911 but i dont know whats true, speculation or fake??!! Can some americans or new yorkers tell me what they think happened. Is it possible that there were no planes?? I saw "september clues", but that can also be fake. So i dont know what to think. I d appreciate it if some of you just told me what you think. Thx in advance.
NBK1313 6 months ago
RKOwens4 has lots of vids, with links as well credible quotes that will debunk anything you can think of trying to spread lies about 9/11. Have fun
ThyBountyHunter 6 months ago
@Richards1796 I was talking about the plane (?) wings before impact, it is the same shot here at 00:42 and in the other video at about 00:26, it is from Gamma Press, stop video and look carefully to plane wings, do you see some differences?
watch?v=NfkD6JoV4xg&feature=related
bernuga 6 months ago
so guys, please compare the plane in this video at 00:42 and in this other video at 00:26,it is the same shot from Gamma Press:
watch?v=NfkD6JoV4xg&feature=related
does wings looks the same for u?
bernuga 6 months ago
okay people, consider this: the buildings are made of metal, true, but they aren't dense with metal in a complete solid surface. the plane hit the building and broke the thin metal beams between windows, once inside the building, it's just open space! that's why the plane entered the building without any resistance.
phillyguy95 6 months ago
yeah but if the plane is going 500+ miles per hour of corse it can hit
benry200 7 months ago
00:41 are wings in the "wrong" direction?
MrDuspaghi 7 months ago 2
@MrDuspaghi
I agree wings are in wrong direction. Plane has no vertical upright stabilizer. Plane almost appears to be flying upside down. Also it is coming in from the wrong angle to the building to exit on that side of the building. Compare the angle of plane a 00:42 to to clip right before that one, where the plane hits from a more appropriate angle, but it looks fake too, especially as it comes out the other side.
retiredaxmurderer 6 months ago
@retiredaxmurderer finally,I tought I was going mad.Now please watch this video,is the same GammaPress shot,but now wings look in the right direction (like at 00:26)!At least for me:
watch?v=Mksti5xcT6E&feature=related
Can u see the difference?
MrDuspaghi 6 months ago
@retiredaxmurderer sorry, I gave u wrong link,pls look at this, same shot,but seems different to me,00:26
watch?v=NfkD6JoV4xg&feature=related
bernuga 6 months ago
you Americans claim to be the police of the world and try to convince yourselves that you 'liberate' every 'oppressed' nation yet you allowed THIS to go unpunished and unquestioned and am yet to see BUSH PAY FOR HIS CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
DAVIDCOINCOIN12 7 months ago
bottom line a plane that size crashing into a building that size would not cause that kind of damage even if the plane exploded on impact and why did the building fall str8 down like a planned demo
DAVIDCOINCOIN12 7 months ago
>FACT: NO commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
>implying that your all knowing and all seeing. and that you were there just like the frenchmen that were filming the first plane hit the first tower. because it was the french and not the sand niggers that flew the planes into the tower. this is MY consparisy theroy. hurrrr durrrr
TheLateKnight4785 8 months ago
IT DIDNT HAPPEN?IT WAS AN INSIDE JOB. Where do these fucking morons come from? Are they all Alien Abductees
stubbostubbs 8 months ago
Aluminum plane with 20,000 gallons of jet fuel. Steal melts at 2000 F into liquid form. The softer steal inside the building could never hold the 100s of tons of the upper floors. the first plane was only going 87 knots (97 MPH) while the plane in the world trade center was at maximum speep (570 MPH). That isn't even relevant.
BENCOINTERNATIONAL 8 months ago
0:42 - 0:44
How a hollow aluminium tube weighing 80 metric tons can carve it's way straight through hundreds of tons worth of a solid concrete and steel, and then appear to make it out the other side before disintegrating, and THEN exploding all over the place completely defies logic, physics, and anything else you can come up with.
phwoarprozak 8 months ago 2
Comparing a slow landing crash into an impenetrable surface (runway) cannot be held the same as a high speed crash into a forgiving building. I would assume that a plane traveling @ 600 mph would puncture a steel building pretty good. The only other plane to hit a building was a B-25 bomber in 1945 and it flew into the Empire State Bldg. It left a hole and ended up inside of it. The Empire State is sturdier than the WTC and a plane made it into it @1/2 of the speed of 9-11 jets.
thatswhattheyis 8 months ago
@thatswhattheyis
The aeroplane would tear itself apart flying 600mph at sea level, another hallmark that the object seen in these videos representing a real boeing, is fake or has been manipulated.
muckletoon 8 months ago
@muckletoon you are quite right there , at 600 miles. it would break
mariamole011 20 hours ago
@thatswhattheyis
FACT: A 767 cannot fly 500mph at 800ft because of air density and structural integrity.
FACT: The tail section of the B-25 bomber that struck the Empire State Building was stuck in the outer wall of the building and could be seen from the street. It did NOT end up inside it.
FACT: WTC 1 & 2 were an engineering feat that could withstand hurricane force winds and MULTIPLE airliner hits.
FACT: NO commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
lmfecher 8 months ago 16
@lmfecher right, so if i flew a plane into your house, which could probably take a hurricane, i suppose it would just bounce off?
FACT : you're a dumbass
brymaster4 5 months ago
@brymaster4
PLEASE DO THIS AT HOME!
Get into your car, Skippy. Now drive your car as fast as it will go and without braking, RAM it into a parked car. Tell me fucktard, how far THROUGH that parked car did you travel?
lmfecher 5 months ago
@thatswhattheyis R U FUCKING MENTAL??,,,,,,,,HAHAHAHAHAHA,,,,,,,,,A FORGIVING BUILDING,,,,,,,,,,,,WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKIN ABOUT STUPID,,,,,,,,YOU BETTER SNAP OUTTA FUCKIN DREAM MORON,,,,,,,,THE WORLD TRADE CENTER TOWERS WERE BUILT STRONGER THAN ANY OTHER BUILDINGS IN THE WORLD,,,,,,,,,,THEY WERE A TUBE IN TUBE STRUCTURE,,,,,,,,WITH MASSIVE STEEL GIRDERS,,,,,,,,WHEN YOU WATCH THE PLANE HIT THE IMPACT WALL,,,,,,,NEITHER THE PLANE ,,,,NOR THE BUILDING REACT,,,,,,,THIS IS HOW WE KNOW IT'S FAKE
bigbopper993 6 months ago
9/11 IS AN INSIDE JOB
God888555 8 months ago
why snoop dogg?
funnyclipstoday 8 months ago 2
any "real" plane would explode ON contact with the wtc sending debris hurtling in all directions,it certainly wouldn't slice through the steel outer walls and concrete floors with such force that the nose cone would continue on and slice its way out through the opposite steel walls while at the same time keeping its fragile aluminium wing tips & tail-section intact.
i fear the perps may never face justice as long as the guilty media protect the official "bullshit" conspiracy theory
cartoonplanes 8 months ago
yeah those flights didn't hit anything read John Farmer''s book
the onty flight they got right is the one over PA.which was shot down.
bucknorm 9 months ago
@bucknorm
I digress, Shanksville is the most obvious no brainer, a skip full of trash is supposed to be evidence a plane crashed there.
muckletoon 9 months ago 2
@muckletoon there was one local news clip thats on here somewhere that shows pieces of jet in someones yrd a mile from the sopposed crash site..it was only shown once
MERCURHILLMANIAC 5 months ago
Bah ha ha ha ha! Stupid fuck. A beer can huh. A 200,000 pound beer can, going 500 mph would split through that buildings CONCRETE exterior like a hot knife through butter, which it did. Saying that the towers were jet impact proof is like saying that the Titanic was unsinkable. It's all bullshit. Birds give problems when they fly into the engine, which is to be expected idiot. The plane in the beginning of this foolish video was landing at probably 150 mph and not even comparable. Douche.
nwow2866 9 months ago 2
@nwow2866
yes, and the planes in the fake 911 videos are travelling 500mph+ according to NIST, which is impossible for a commercial aeroplane, the G-force would tear it apart.
muckletoon 9 months ago
@muckletoon why are there dumb retards like you?
Jangochase 9 months ago
@Jangochase
someone has to change your diaper
muckletoon 9 months ago
@muckletoon conspiracy theorist you dont know crap dude
Jangochase 9 months ago
@Jangochase
planehuggers are oblivious to the laws of physics
muckletoon 8 months ago 16
@nwow2866 you sounded stupid when you say a plane flying at 500mph.. but seriously at almost sea level? thats impossible, no place can fly at that speed it would tear apart before even reaching new york if it was flying at that speed, and you should see the damage a bird can do to the front of the plane, they literally destroy it.
TrollingSince1991 7 months ago
so fake... so the planes that left with flight manifests from airports that never arrived at their destinations just magically disappeared... yeah right...
kaliboysd 9 months ago
@kaliboysd
google : flight175 still flying after 911
muckletoon 9 months ago
@muckletoon Oh yes im a fool? How did the TWC fall magical fairies? Those men who hijacked the planes where are they? Oh! Thats right them, bin Laden, and Tupac are kickin it in Cuba!
GIVE ME A BREAK!!!
BigMcGhee 9 months ago
@BigMcGhee
what's the TWC? It's fairly obvious to grown adults the world trade centre was pulverised by explosives, how else can you account for it turning to fine dust in 12 seconds?
muckletoon 9 months ago
WTF OFCOARSE THE PLANE WONT EXPLODE ON IMPACT, ITS NOT A FUKING MISSILE.
The Fuel is In the engine, The Engine Blows Up IN the Building, Once Half the Fuselage is in the Building Already, What Kind of RETARDED shit is this.
Peaceinlifenowar 9 months ago
@Peaceinlifenowar
the 'fuselage' comes out the otherside of the WTC intact, this doesn't reflect reality.
muckletoon 9 months ago
No. I am not having it. The way these things were made and designed, i mean come on! Lets face it , the planes had no chance, 200tonnes of aircraft against those uprights, or rather the skeleton, sliced up the planes. The fuel is another case but in my experience fuel just burns.
MrTinylight 9 months ago
all we GOYIMS are finished
Maanchild 9 months ago
@hommedespoir
holyomg, ep-ic!
muckletoon 9 months ago
Look... There is no way that the collapse was caused by planes. These people who are doing this are fucking serious guys. They've managed to manipulate and since then get everyone caught up in the further "Hi-Jacking" with the collapse of the banking system.. this was rolled out a long time ago folks and it aint over yet. There is a real prob here because this place was the centre of all the business dealings of the western corporations at that time.. this worked for them. Sure did!
MrTinylight 9 months ago
@MrTinylight The collapse was caused my the 1000 degree burning jet engine fuel burning through the beams and floors. This video is completely wrong.
haloking1223 9 months ago
@hommedespoir u ask how the illusion was done wantingto believe there was an illusion? did 2 million new yorkers imagine the 2nd plane. did every camera from every news media work together to take FAKE images? u r an idiot if u think it wasnt real. One of my best friends was in Brooklyn acros the river and watched the 2nd plane go in. did he and 2 million others share some kind of hallucination? what about the 200 or so passengers that never came home? say they didnt exist to their families!!!
bluegrassreb1 9 months ago
I also wonder why the building doesn't move at all... as if nothing even hit it.
Juanster23 9 months ago
Yeah it looks so unlike a 767 hitting a building and plowing straight through it. I mean who could believe that??
roquefortfiles 9 months ago
i find all the advertisements about anti-terrorist courses a tad..... disturbing. Google really knows how to place the propaganda.
Mindrotjuggalo 9 months ago
Pls, forgive my lack of English, but what you people mean by ghost plane? thank you.
MrCocho69 9 months ago
@Whatever174
ok, go ahead and disprove it all. I have a degree in physics with a specialty in thermodynamics btw.
splendid1000 9 months ago
It's amazing how according to this guy every single video that was taken by bystanders is fake. How could every single one of these videos be faked? Why do people have to find faults in every single thing, especially in something as sensitive as this?
Bengsch4 9 months ago
@Whatever174 Anyone who believes "Wikileaks" is anything other than an elaborately staged attempt by many powerful governments to give the (false) impression to "the people" that they (the govts) are opposing/conflicting with each other is deluded - precisely the effect intended when "Wikileaks" was set up. Give the people some evidence of unimportant, minor ways in which govts disagree and criticise each other, so that the govts can get on with the MAJOR ways in which they collaborate. Clever.
NellJSmith 10 months ago
@NellJSmith ...That's why "Wikileaks" has only contained trivial "revelations" which, although at first seeming to show "morally wrong" behaviour on the part of governments, when closely examined, tend actually to make govts look GOOD rather than BAD (e.g. covertly spying on other nations... well, that's a good idea, isn't it, meaning that our govts are on their toes, right?! Trusting nobody completely? Good idea! And so on)...where are any TRULY damaging "revelations"? Let alone 9/11 truth! HA!
NellJSmith 10 months ago
@hommedespoir the important question is how was it done? I think the most important is it was an inside job and why was it done such a show as u call it. even though we all know the answer or should know.
rebecationable 10 months ago
the reason theres so little smoke and explosion was because it was going so fast..think of it this way if u take a .50cal bullet made of brass bullet much weaker softer metal than steel and fire it at 2 inches of steel its going so fast it will punch a hole no problem...in the video you can obviously see the entry point of the plane
TheStoned88 10 months ago
Planes or something hit sure.
They werent the official ones though.
What other reason could this obssessive compulsion to alter videos, not release them etc be?
If the official story were true thered be a LOT of pentagon Tapes for one clearly showing the airliner hitting it.
zenoist2 10 months ago
Watch a Pre-January 8th copy of Inception. Listen closely when the actors say imagine, reality, safe, and envelope, or point pistols. You'll hear the words, Loughner, offin' her, part of the word Giffords, and much more. Some even say they hear, do it.
jamestargetedindiv 10 months ago
@hommedespoir The man that made this video 77 rippel effect was extradited from Ireland to face trial in the UK for sending copies to a court, he is up on the 9th May 2011 in Newark crown court, I met Antony John Hill whilst he was living here in Ireland and went to his appeal against extradition here in Dublin. The government want to nail his arse for making this video.
davethewebbuilder 10 months ago
what a load of bollocks
villarule 10 months ago
The planes are edited in. It's that simple.
The first whitnesses on the street, interviewed right after the first "impact" all said:
"The building just exploded" Nobody there saw a plane. (planes)
BlatendCrude 10 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
but there is a threat,....don’t take your eye off the ball, the threat of nazi islam on the streets of the UK, is real ! i live in a norhtern town, 50%+ muslim population, mosques being built every 1km, colonisation of the UK is real, indigenous people being suppressed by the UN, making it illegal to challange islam, islam is not a religion, it’s a cult, a cult of hate, 1930s the Nazis indoctrinated and brainwashed the young, islam does exactly the same, a warning from history, EDL NS
pjNSwhiteboy 10 months ago
what you mean ghost plane?
DRaCuLACod4 10 months ago
@DRaCuLACod4 means its not a plane. really ask ur self..would a plane completely disappears into a building and then explode? .....wait, wait..i know i know..the buildings were made of entire glass. ..yeah.
romahnae 10 months ago
FBI said Bin Laden is not a suspect in 9/11 attack because there is not a strong evidence against him.
justicepartyuk 10 months ago
How many of you know that Barbara Bush & Ann Cappelletti are illegitimate daughters of aleister Crowley, conceived with sex magick (tantra) with their mothers, Pauline Pierce and Ann's mother, one of many 20 yr old Sicilian girls lured to Abbey of Thelema to have se magick w Crowley to procreate the antichrist. 911 was a huge illusion and mega ritual perpetrated to steal $trillion from U.S. taxpayers & insurance companies in fraud. No planes, only suggestions of planes by paid planted liars.
074August 10 months ago 13
@074August AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! sex magick? i also love how you included the gaelic word for love in there. what jacked up priest yelled this as he emptied his balls onto your face? you must be completely fucking retarded. if you honestly believe this the re read your bible. it states that your anti christ will be conceived of a normal man and womans coupling's. not with "sex magick'. you fucking downie.
TheLateKnight4785 8 months ago
@forman208 Do alittle more research...
PMRballa 11 months ago 7
@PMRballa I reckon dude!
888JNR 10 months ago
One day our american friends will realize that the German were right!
Odessa1983 11 months ago
@hommedespoir
Magic show audiences are bullshit and fake. You really cannot compare the two and if you actually are then you're more crazy than I thought.
ov3chtr1ck 11 months ago
@hommedespoir
You cannot compare some magic show to 9/11. That's comparing apples to oranges, they're not the same at all. Audio or no audio. People still saw planes go into all three. What's the explanation for them seeing it with their own eyes?
ov3chtr1ck 11 months ago
@hommedespoir
So you the WTC should have immediately crumbled once the planes hit? And all the witnesses who SAW the plane hit? I'm guessing they're lying to cover it up too?
ov3chtr1ck 11 months ago
@hommedespoir
and I, thats for people with high SECURITY CLEARANCE. Which you probably don't have. Give it a rest.
ov3chtr1ck 11 months ago
@hommedespoir
So was the WTC? I don't understand you point, brother. There are pictures of several windows being broken, even fires coming out of some. The "unidentified military plane" was a C130, which NORAD I believe saw was in the area of UA175 and asked if he had a visual on it, which he did. No way UA175 could of flown. Ever realize how many planes there really are? Too many. Could easily have been a mistake. FBI and the government don't have to release anything to regular guys like you
ov3chtr1ck 11 months ago
@hommedespoir
ADHD? Haha. Sorry, I have no such thing. Do you mean why did the Pentagon still stand after the plane hit? I wouldn't know, I'm not a structural engineer. I'm guessing because of the way it was built. No, you don't often read of that, but you also need to realize there is only ONE Pentagon. There were definitely broken windows dude. Also, how come not ONE witness recalls a plane flying RIGHT over the Pentagon after the crash? Hmm?
ov3chtr1ck 11 months ago
@196289008 yeah sure......BEWARE THE EVIL RADICALS AND THEY'RE EVIL BOX CUTTERS!!!.....sarcasm
AlanClinton123 11 months ago
look at the speed that plane was going. it would take a second for pysics to react to the speed it was going anyways. and the wings wouldnt have blown up until they hit something anyways. and at the rate of speed the plane was going the wings would have started to explode as they were entering the building and that is when the explosion happens. you conspiritors make me sick. use common knowledge for once
porscheowner6 11 months ago
@porscheowner6 "look at the speed that plane was going" - The speeds the planes were going is an interesting thing to mention since the official version has speeds that are higher than the maximum speeds of structural statbility for these aircraft at that low altitude where air density is high. Pilots for 911 Truth brings up this fact (many are real world Boeing B767 pilots). Their initial attempts to even hit these buildings at those speeds using multi-million $ simulators failed.
zetetic0void 10 months ago
part2... Pilots (many ex-military & commercial B757 pilot) say the manuevers to hit the Pentagon were virtually impossible even for seasoned large airliner pilots. The idea that pathetic failed single-prop Cessna "non-pilot" *terrorists* could suddenly become more skilled than seasoned airliner pilots is unreaslistic. It's hard to believe *terrorists* could manage to hit the WTC buildings let alone the Pentagon. 'Remote-control' (guided to certain floors) or CGI planes seems more reasonable.
zetetic0void 10 months ago
so i guess ur next theory will say there werent any towers right?
RESIDENTRYAN 11 months ago
@Steelerguy6178 You are the typical America basher. You pay too much attention to shit you know nothing about because your own country sucks so much. The planes were going extremely fast that is a fact.
UndercoverCracker 11 months ago
@UndercoverCracker
tell me how fast exactly?
muckletoon 11 months ago
@ov3chtr1ck nobody has seen a plane goes into the pentagon, btw search about project blue beam and holographic tehcnology, if you want a link on holographic demonstration just ask :)
RumuhAlg 11 months ago
@RumuhAlg
Actually, plenty of people have seen a plane go into the Pentagon, too. Just cause there isn't such detailed videos like the ones in New York doesn't mean it didn't happen. Plenty of people have given testimony of how they heard it, felt it, even books shook off their bookshelves. Some people even SAW it hit.
ov3chtr1ck 11 months ago
@ov3chtr1ck there has been investigations that shows something hit the pentagon but not a plane. They based that on that the damage (hole in the wall) was to small to be a plane + there was nothing left from the plane, it was suddenly gone (sry for my english)
RumuhAlg 11 months ago
@RumuhAlg
No, investigations have been done and it concludes a plane hit the Pentagon. People saw it and heard it. Also, there were TONS of debris' over the lawn. What are you even talking about?
ov3chtr1ck 11 months ago
600 Muslim died in twin towers, 1,100 those killed in twin towers were foreign nationals. 9/11 hijackers were scapegoat. 9/11 was inside job as a excuse to take over Middle East oil.click Justice party UK.
justicepartyuk 11 months ago
I've seen plenty of these "hoax" videos before, but this guy just tops them all for dumbassness
joeshmoe470 11 months ago
@196289008 911 was a sad day fro america
MrTonyisawesome 11 months ago
@196289008 911 was a sad day fro america
MrTonyisawesome 11 months ago
With the second wtc crash, I would guess that the plane went inside the building and the fuel exploded when it was inside. To me, my guess seems more logical than this video :/ but seriously, 9/11 should be left at rest and conspiracies should not be made. What's done is done, Just think of the families of the people that dies in that building :/
mpc1209 11 months ago
@mpc1209 Those families ARE the reason you SHOULD want to find out what happened that day. Not saying any conspiracy is true.. But I don't believe in terrorism. I simply don't think the terrorism as the US government adcovates it actually exists.
GoodFortuneOfficial 11 months ago
Heat & fire did not turn twin towers into molten lava,explosives did.click Justice party UK.
justicepartyuk 11 months ago
@ov3chtr1ck
they have seen something flying in the towers - thinking - believing it was a plane ... what else should be flying in ???
but a cruise missile painted in the the airline colors could be make the same effect ... they saw the "flying things" only for less than seconds ...
How can an aluminium plane cut through a steel building like a hot knife through butter ???
;-)
dirtyyyminds 11 months ago
@dirtyyyminds
This comment is so ridiculous I'm not even going to reply to it. Sorry.
ov3chtr1ck 11 months ago
@dirtyyyminds Not quite a hot knife through butter. The nose makes the initial impact with the building, so the force is confined to a small surface area.
squirttle92 11 months ago
@dirtyyyminds The plane is traveling like 500 mph....the faster the velocity, the greater the impact. After a tornado, people have found hay stuck in light poles
buddymyhomeboy123 11 months ago
There are two questions here on this video ( and we have to be honest with ourselves whether we're conspiracy nuts or not )
1st Question:
On 0:27 to 0:28; why did a flash or puff occur located on the very bottom right of the facade facing WTC1? The flash coincidentally occurred during the "plane collision".
2nd Question:
Notice frames 0:41 to 0:42. Why was the right wing of the Boeing missing before impact on a bright and sunny day?
Anyone?
saltydog78 11 months ago
@saltydog78 I can not see either things you are highlighting. When I pause it at 0:41, I can clearly see both wings of the plane. Perhaps I'm looking at the wrong thing? Please elaborate? :) Cheers
squirttle92 11 months ago
@squirttle92 LOL. ok
saltydog78 11 months ago
Comment removed
saltydog78 11 months ago
Heat & fire did not turn twin towers into molten lava, explosives did. click Justice party UK.
justicepartyuk 11 months ago
256 people can't tell the difference between special effects more suited to a Harry Potter film compared to what happens in real life when vehicles collide with a stationary object....
stinkyknix 11 months ago
Bigbopper, the only people lying around here are you disgusting truthers who spread absolute lies, lies that fool other ignorant individuals such as yourself! I can't believe anyone is dumb enough to believe those planes weren't real and didn't hit the buildings, you absolutely HAVE to have a learning disability if you believe such an idiotic lie. You are a disgusting individual who does dishonor those who lost their lives that day.
youstupidmoron 11 months ago
@youstupidmoron Well it's an amazing phenomenon that so many people believe 9/11 was an inside job. It makes you wonder what other lies millions of people would believe if enough effort was put into telling them. It seems you have a good point about people being stupid and believing a massive lie. Maybe the offical version of 9/11 is one massive lie?
RavenPrecept 11 months ago
alright, prove it. fly a 747 into a skyscraper at, i dunno 550 miles per hour, and show me what comes first, impact or fireball. something traveling that fast isn't gonna bounce off the side of the building or crumple like a soda can. people that say no planes crashed into the towers discredit and dishonor the lives taken that day. shame on you.
bumwrecker27 11 months ago
@bumwrecker27 discredit and dishonour the dead,,,,,,,,fuck you asshole,,,,,,,get the fuck out of my face with that bullshit,,,,,,,,550 miles an hour?,,,,,,,,if you knew your head from your ass,,,,,,,,,you would know that those speeds are unattainable by a 767 at 700 feet altitude,,,,,,,,,they lied to you,,,,,,,fema lied to you,,,,,,,,the government lied to you,,,,,,,wake the fuck up you moron!
bigbopper993 11 months ago
@bigbopper993 this is how conspiracy theorists do it. first, they act really offended and choose to offend someone. second, they try to give you a physics lesson. third, they tell you everyone lied to you (i wouldn't doubt they lied to me, they still do it TODAY), fourth, they tell you to wake up, even though they can't prove a fraction of circumstantial evidence.
i know elements inside the US government allowed this to happen. i also know a cruise missile couldn't leave the clean imprint
bumwrecker27 11 months ago
@bumwrecker27
Neither could lightweight flimsy hollow aluminium wings leave the Wily E Coyote imprint on the WTC.
muckletoon 11 months ago
@muckletoon ur argument is convincing a lot of people, dude. i suppose the terrorists just painted a black spot on the tower and the 'hologram' flew right through, too? if we're in a cartoon world, we've gotta consider all the possibilities. remember, it's not just aluminum on a plane. one wouldn't be able to get off the ground at 160 mph if that were the case. carbon fiber, electrical components, jet turbines, rubber wheels, human bodies, etc. think about that
bumwrecker27 11 months ago
@bigbopper993 of its 'hologram' in the side of a building. explain how the fireball we see exits the other side of the tower at a dampened velocity on the same vector as this 'hologram.' cruise missiles don't blow up air on the other side of their target. explain the roars of jet turbines thousands of people heard. cruise missiles don't make that much noise, and espeically not that specific noise while in flight (unless this hologram had speakers). i'm not the moron, you need to wake up
bumwrecker27 11 months ago
@bigbopper993 Those speeds are NOT unattainable, they are just extremely dangerous. They test planes at those altitudes and speeds before they are put into production to see if they can handle the stress. I'm a pilot, I know a few things (not to be rude).
AMITZpaintball 11 months ago
@bigbopper993 im still waiting for an explanation for some of the topics i presented. a logical/rational explanation, not you calling me an asshole or a fuckstick or a moron, but an actual explanation. i don't give you shit for believing what you believe, i don't give you shit for being a horrible comedian or having a fat ass, and i research my shit before i post it. ps: i wasn't in YOUR face waving bullshit until YOU started talking.
bumwrecker27 11 months ago
@bumwrecker27 watch?v=25vlt7swhCM
Psy0psAgent 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Psy0psAgent The WTC towers were surfaced with a thin aluminum sheeting. the exoskeleton of the towers was a grid of 13X13 inch steel columns which were placed 18 inch apart. At the base of the towers these columns were approximately 2.5 inches thick and gradually thinning out toward the top. At floor 80, the columns were approximately 1/2 inch thick at the very most. The columns were NOT full steel, they were hollowed out columns.
bumwrecker27 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Psy0psAgent The towers were surfaced with a thin aluminum sheeting. the exoskeleton of the towers was a grid of 13X13 inch steel columns which were placed 18 inch apart. At the base of the towers these columns were approximately 2.5 inches thick and gradually thinning out toward the top. At floor 80, the columns were approximately 1/2 inch thick at the very most. The columns were NOT full steel, they were hollowed out columns. do some research next time.
bumwrecker27 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Psy0psAgent The towers were surfaced with a thin aluminum sheeting. the exoskeleton of the towers was a grid of 13X13 inch steel columns which were placed 18 inch apart. At the base of the towers these columns were approximately 2.5 inches thick and gradually thinning out toward the top. At floor 80, the columns were approximately 1/2 inch thick at the very most. The columns were NOT full steel, they were hollowed out columns
bumwrecker27 10 months ago
@Psy0psAgent i couldn't post what i was trying to, so i'm just gonna say it. the towers were not made completely out of steel. it was a 13x13 inch grid spread 18 inches apart. at the base of the towers, the columns were 2 and a half inches thick and continued to thin out to the top of the tower. at the impact zone, the columns were maybe a half inch thick. the video you linked me to shows a fighter jet flying into a slab of concrete ten feet thick. it isn't the same as 9/11.
bumwrecker27 10 months ago
@bumwrecker27 Oh please. I got the blueprints, get lost. I worked concrete for 15 years. Concrete does not powder. Physics is the same in the entire universe. The aluminum plane would tear apart at that altitude & speed. The wind on the buildings did more on a constant basis than a silly wile e coyote plane. Gimme a break with this shill crap. Go attack Blueprint for Truth or September Clues. My freakin dog tags wont melt in jet fuel freak. THERE ARE NO FAMILIES OF PASSENGERS. NONE. Get lost.
Psy0psAgent 10 months ago 3
@Psy0psAgent thanks, its good to know some family friends dont exist.
iNigga4 10 months ago
@Psy0psAgent i see what ur tryna say but...but...as ur references shows, there were still dust and smoke and fire as it was going in there..it didn't went all the way in and then just explode..the bitch is fooling you with "disappeared" it didn't. basically.
romahnae 10 months ago
@romahnae
of course there was dust and smoke lol, anything entering the towers at high speeds is gona produce dust and smoke...
that doesnt explain the complete lack of ANY significant structural damage to the plane.
splendid1000 9 months ago
@splendid1000 yo why ya'l always wait mad long to comment son, im too lazy to search through all these comments to see what i've said. but lemme try to answer that..
...well i can't answer that, cuz i don't remember what i said haha...i just noticed one more thing...didn't the news broadcast about an American Airlines and a United Airways going into the buildings...well it just hit me ppl...
even though those shots of the plane can been seen from multiple angels not one shows the planes colors