Added: 6 months ago
From: ricthuse
Views: 4,025
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @dasgrooven they were oriented towards the river and were lucky! Lol

  • Comment removed

  • This video went viral on Pyongyang

  • What a load of book worm crapola. Did it ever occur to you that Boeing posts VMO as a true operational number, not a "fly apart" number? Exceeding MMO at altitude may produce Mach tuck, but at low altitudes, you have not proven that VMO cannot be exceeded without producing critical structural damage, only that the numbers claimed are not approved of by Boeing. Okay.... fine.

  • Mach number = (gama * R * T) ^.5 It is a function of temperature, R for the medium (air) and ratio of the specific heats (1.4 typical for air. Mach 1 at 72 F is 670 kts. If you are going 360 kts, you are going .53 Mach, NOT .86 mach. It is not unreasonable to fly it at 520 kts sea level and not have it come apart. I am a Mech engineer...aero... Sorry I don't believe your are correct.

  • @seaplaneguy1 So this calculator is wrong?:

    convert-to. com/conversion/speed/convert-m­ach-to-knot. html

    Do you have a real name other than "seaplaneguy1" on YouTube.

    Regards,

    Jeppe Severin, Denmark, EU

    (Mindfulness) Therapist

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more