it looks like it runs fine to me, i dont mind if you have to run on low graphics all i want is to play a good game. when you say it is bad are you saying you have to run it on low?
I don't get it my card apparentlry surpasses the minimum requirements (6490m 1GB GDDR5) but didn't run half as good as some of the more worse cards could it be that i'm on switchable graphics (I have the amd card enabled) and will changing it to fixed mode help?
@vfgud That's below the requirements. It's the slowest card of the series, and it's a laptop version.. You can't play the game with that setup (even if you could, you would experience massive lag).
Okay, so...since this is a pretty low rate Radeon graphics card, could the intel hd 3000 graphics card handle medium settings? i5 processor, 4gb Ram?640 hard drive...
@JokersJist No way, Intel graphics are not made for these kind of games. I don't think they could even run it. My card is old now, but still going strong (expect this game), although I managed to push it to run on Medium-High settings on 1280x720, which is still bad :(
@DDumbassProductions Hmm, your pc seems to be pretty old. I think you should try the beta, it wont cost you anything. Maybe you could run it on the lowest settings. And you also need to have Win 7/Vista, because the game won't work on XP. Hope I helped :)
@Crunchman2600 Well, yeah. I don't know the experience of playing ultra settings, I think the graphics are really beautiful. BC2 runs very good, and, comparing to the beta, it's not a huge difference. Still, this is a beta, maybe there will be further optimization, but I'm not sure.
Hey dude when you will do the full version movie ?
paweleczko8 1 month ago
it looks like it runs fine to me, i dont mind if you have to run on low graphics all i want is to play a good game. when you say it is bad are you saying you have to run it on low?
dingodiladi 1 month ago
Would it run on my PC?
Intel Quad Core 3,0 Ghz
4 Gbyte RAM
2x Sapphire ATi 3850
DDumbassProductions 2 months ago
Comment removed
mascotefera 2 months ago
@DDumbassProductions Buy new Video Card ¬¬ Sapphire ATI sux
mascotefera 2 months ago
@mascotefera Wow thanks for the great help. I never expected such a helpful answer
DDumbassProductions 2 months ago
@devistational no, not really. The pc community is way larger, and this guys of sucks so it can't handle the games full settings
DeadlyMountainPro 2 months ago
thats good for old school cards
addres999 3 months ago
no wonder why everyone move to console....anyway thx for reviewing
Devastationable 4 months ago
Hi, does the full version work with the hd3850? So, not the beta, but the full version?
Logical 4 months ago
@Logical Yeah, as you can see it worked fine with the beta, so it works on the full version too. Maybe I'll do a video about it later...
rronqe27 4 months ago
can i run it with hd 4650 1gb
hd4650rock 4 months ago
I don't get it my card apparentlry surpasses the minimum requirements (6490m 1GB GDDR5) but didn't run half as good as some of the more worse cards could it be that i'm on switchable graphics (I have the amd card enabled) and will changing it to fixed mode help?
vfgud 4 months ago
@vfgud That's below the requirements. It's the slowest card of the series, and it's a laptop version.. You can't play the game with that setup (even if you could, you would experience massive lag).
rronqe27 4 months ago
@rronqe27
I've seen the 6470m and the 5470 mobility have better performance than mine and my card is better.
vfgud 4 months ago
Okay, so...since this is a pretty low rate Radeon graphics card, could the intel hd 3000 graphics card handle medium settings? i5 processor, 4gb Ram?640 hard drive...
JokersJist 5 months ago
@JokersJist No way, Intel graphics are not made for these kind of games. I don't think they could even run it. My card is old now, but still going strong (expect this game), although I managed to push it to run on Medium-High settings on 1280x720, which is still bad :(
rronqe27 5 months ago
@rronqe27 Darn :(...I was able to run FEAR 2 on high settings though...sure I couldn't run this on lowest settings?
JokersJist 5 months ago
@JokersJist yeah but him cpu is a bottelneck this supports quad core
mennogamer559 4 months ago
..all Settings on "LOW" no AA and min. AF
trubin06 5 months ago
QuadCore Q6600 @ 3,1 GHZ, 6GB Ram & HD3870 OC @845 GPU --->30fps "outside" and 18-30 fps "inside" the metro. -.-
No chance, i'm gonna buy a nV560 Ti 2GB.
trubin06 5 months ago
Hey man, will it run on my PC?
Intel Pentium D 2,6 GHz
2 Gbyte RAM
Sapphire HD3850
DDumbassProductions 5 months ago
@DDumbassProductions Hmm, your pc seems to be pretty old. I think you should try the beta, it wont cost you anything. Maybe you could run it on the lowest settings. And you also need to have Win 7/Vista, because the game won't work on XP. Hope I helped :)
rronqe27 5 months ago
@rronqe27 Yes you did. Thanks for the help. Btw I got Vista.
DDumbassProductions 5 months ago
Man, is the gap between BF3 and BC2 that large? I have the same GPU. Thanks for making this video.
Crunchman2600 5 months ago
@Crunchman2600 Well, yeah. I don't know the experience of playing ultra settings, I think the graphics are really beautiful. BC2 runs very good, and, comparing to the beta, it's not a huge difference. Still, this is a beta, maybe there will be further optimization, but I'm not sure.
rronqe27 5 months ago