Religion is not unattractive because it is "complicate gobbledygook". Rather, it is unfounded and illogical, divisive, and often damaging to emotional wellbeing.
The chief problem with the Lost Symbol is that its driving premises are utterly ridiculous.
this is just a frustrated christian, or am I missing something. like said before: it's a novel, supported by some interesting facts, interesting for the mainstream and more intellegent public. it's going to sell big and that's because the book is a good one. the criticism of this man makes no sense.
well i gotta say this Dan Brown's style of writing is very predictable i mean if u have read his previous books they are all based in the same pattern . i mean when i started reading lost symbol after first few chapters i knew who is going to be the real villain ..so ithink dan brown really needs to change his writing style a bit its becoming repeptive
Never the less it was a good book. I reached the climactic point at 3am this morning and i screamed - almost paralized by what i just read. i'm sure i woke the neighbors. go read the book. dan brown is a genius at making the reader's heart palpatate.
I was wondering why this guy had such perspectives... he somehow seems to expect Dan Brown to explain the birth of the universe among other things. Remember this book is a NOVEL... Then I realized that Clarke is a Christian... and this is a biased review.
I would assume that the "Enormous differences in teachings" have more to do with cultural differences than an actual difference within the religions themselves. Table manners are table manners. Again striving for a common goal of "Table manners", but there are cultural differences to this end. A trivial example, but you could see how people will fit the bill to their perception. We need to feel the ground under our feet.
This guy seems to be reviewing the book from a christian's point of view. His opinion is biased. How can he say the book is a dream but an impossible reality and then say that christianity is a reality? Both the book and Christianity provide the same ideas and concepts about a superior power but suggest different details and explanations. Who's to say one of them is an impossible reality if the other is equally as improbable?
everyone is biased. It's a fair review, because Dan Brown claims that he himself is a Christian, and many people stand by his novels AS IF they present religious (not to mention historical, even scientific) truth. Since Brown gets so many of the facts wrong in his presentation, most of his conclusions simply can't be reality, so we can rule out some of those.
I LOVED THIS BOOK!!!!!!¡!!!
MrGhettobunny96 8 months ago
This guy is just a prick.
He sounds like he read the book, but didn't really read it, just went in there with his mind already set in it's blind religous ways.
viking4211 8 months ago
Religion is not unattractive because it is "complicate gobbledygook". Rather, it is unfounded and illogical, divisive, and often damaging to emotional wellbeing.
The chief problem with the Lost Symbol is that its driving premises are utterly ridiculous.
Archaenum 2 years ago
dan brown is amazing!!!
i love all his book,..:))
yuyahanify 2 years ago
the only thing that is lost is Dan Brown.
vesperus1981 2 years ago
this is just a frustrated christian, or am I missing something. like said before: it's a novel, supported by some interesting facts, interesting for the mainstream and more intellegent public. it's going to sell big and that's because the book is a good one. the criticism of this man makes no sense.
it's subjective
olmo2603 2 years ago
well i gotta say this Dan Brown's style of writing is very predictable i mean if u have read his previous books they are all based in the same pattern . i mean when i started reading lost symbol after first few chapters i knew who is going to be the real villain ..so ithink dan brown really needs to change his writing style a bit its becoming repeptive
hixXam007 2 years ago
malack is peter's son zachary, he's not dead XD suck it
mlxp 2 years ago
lol
MrLazyi 2 years ago
@mlxp the trolling is strong in this one
MrKeepsOnTickin 1 year ago
its just a book. its fiction supported by facts. Thats it. Just a book. Dan Brown books are awesome.
ThePerspectiveStudio 2 years ago
Unity without God, sounds like the spirit of the Antichrist. Like BB King sings, 'Same old story, same old song.' Ya_______________wn.
aerycksmusic 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Latin: The Official Language of The Church & State. . . See The Great Seal of Codex Gigas & The Great Seal of The USA.
44AlphaMale44 2 years ago
I've read every dan brown book and they're all great - and we know that they're all fiction
vincejap 2 years ago 5
@vincejap a lot of people complained about grammar in the book. I didn't find none.
KRSchannel 1 month ago
This guy needs to shut up.
UtesFiesta09 2 years ago
Never the less it was a good book. I reached the climactic point at 3am this morning and i screamed - almost paralized by what i just read. i'm sure i woke the neighbors. go read the book. dan brown is a genius at making the reader's heart palpatate.
avittorio 2 years ago
what a load of shit that was ...........fuck me i only wanted a fucking book review and i got a fucking r e lesson............... shut the fuck up
mugzboy1 2 years ago
I was wondering why this guy had such perspectives... he somehow seems to expect Dan Brown to explain the birth of the universe among other things. Remember this book is a NOVEL... Then I realized that Clarke is a Christian... and this is a biased review.
Trex100 2 years ago
I would assume that the "Enormous differences in teachings" have more to do with cultural differences than an actual difference within the religions themselves. Table manners are table manners. Again striving for a common goal of "Table manners", but there are cultural differences to this end. A trivial example, but you could see how people will fit the bill to their perception. We need to feel the ground under our feet.
SnailsOnSpeed 2 years ago
very biased review....lame
SubbyTubbyProduction 2 years ago
No one proves theories - they are either supported or unsupported by evidences.
Having said that, it would be interesting to see you provide some supporting evidence that Greg Clarke kills Muslims.
40518221 2 years ago
This guy seems to be reviewing the book from a christian's point of view. His opinion is biased. How can he say the book is a dream but an impossible reality and then say that christianity is a reality? Both the book and Christianity provide the same ideas and concepts about a superior power but suggest different details and explanations. Who's to say one of them is an impossible reality if the other is equally as improbable?
oiaweh17 2 years ago 4
everyone is biased. It's a fair review, because Dan Brown claims that he himself is a Christian, and many people stand by his novels AS IF they present religious (not to mention historical, even scientific) truth. Since Brown gets so many of the facts wrong in his presentation, most of his conclusions simply can't be reality, so we can rule out some of those.
XSC3 2 years ago
Great vid.
The number 33 is a well known number for freemasons and conspiracy theorists,
It's the number of levels in freemasonry.
Barachem 2 years ago 2