I have created a music album which charts the history of the Space Race.
Space Race by Rhesus Monkey.
The album charts the start of the Space Race with Sputnik 1957, Yuri Gagarin's first human space flight, John Glenn's Triple Orbit, Ed White's Gemini IV Space Walk, then onto Apollo.
You can view videos of three tracks from the album within my YouTube channel.
@Ihdc1 Ice. The whole outside of the rocket formed ice all over it due to the fact that the fuels were kept very cold, causing the ice to form on the external surfaces of the rocket.
@simoncpu Here you go. I heard this song on the radio today and thought it would be good for something. Then I came across this video. Like peanut butter and chocolate. youtube.com/watch?v=iBHA4CCjWVU
Shit, I actually dont like to admit US superiority in any part of space industry or science , but Saturn-V is one big motherfucking sick rocket. Its first stage even called S-IC )))))
And by the way, the most powerful liquid rocket engine is not F-1, its Russian RD-170 please admit that too ;)
@Awesome2482, Actually, after development and tooling costs were complete, if they had kept the booster in production, this would have been MUCH CHEAPER than the Space Shuttle.
For instance, it would have take only about 5 Saturn V launches to heft the entire ISS into orbit, and each section could have been much bigger than what they have up there now.
Shuttle is "reusable" but major portions of it must be re-built before each launch. It's horrendously more expensive than it was planned to be.
I watched every Apollo mission launch there was when I was growing up, and it still makes my spine tingle thinking there are three guys sitting at the top of that thing in a capsule no bigger than a VW Beetle. 8-)
@Zukalt1 LOL....nope.....with all respect for the Russian space-program....this one is the most awesome rocket ever built......hands down. And for the record, I'm not a USA-fan.
@Zukalt1 -- Our space shuttle should never have been built in the first place. It was horrendously more expensive than it was predicted to be.
If we were actually serious about space, we should have kept the Saturn V in production. It could have hefted the entire ISS into orbit with 4 or 5 launches.
But we (our government) are too stupid and our projects are driven too much by politics and getting money for re-election.
shuttle is cool ,it was not shuttle fault but budget problem,i am not from USA but i am sad to see that NASA year budget is like a week budget of military.NASA is the best and most positive USA brand and people in USA dont understand that.
Why do people think the moon landing was fake in my opinion it's like saying we Faked Osama Bin Laden's death or 9/11 was all done by the Government. Do you part and research it, and please don't go to some Hoax website.
@hekidanjo You miss the point. There are documents for all kinds of procedures - the question is how many people KNOW the material and can do the procedure. Scientific and engineering know-how get lost all too easily.
@KeithP357 That only the United States and Russia had (and still have) the resources to even attempt this endeavor is primarily a matter of chance and history. We're all human beings, and Apollo, Soyuz, the Space Shuttle, the ISS all belong to everyone who wishes humanity well. The sooner we get away from the "us vs. them" mentality, the sooner we can move on to even grander things—as a species.
Graham1786 You are so right dude. 9/11 was a government conspirisy too. Elvis is living with Marylin Monroe on a secret island. Moon landings were so fake and JFK was hit by ..... Well we all know the answer to that one. IMF when will people wake up to the truth? It's a mad world A MAD WORLD!!!!!! No one really talks about the aliens in New Mexico ,,,,, another cover up. Just one question Graham,,, are you on the same medication as the rest of us fools?
Werner von Braun, the father of the American Space Program Since 1933 Werner von Braun wore a black form of the 4 th Cavalry Squadron 6 th Regiment SS.24 December 1944, Hitler awarded the Werner von Braun's "Knight's Cross with Swords"
AMAZING what man can do!!!!!! People ask why Niel Armstrong is so humble and meek about what he did,, seeing this, he knows it was not just him but thousands that put him on the MOON.
A tribute to American engineering, made in USA. Goddard likely would have been impressed, recall that it was the American Goddard who made the world's first successful liquid-fueled rocket. The location It is at 20 Upland Street, Auburn, Massachusetts. It was Goddards efforts that were later further developed by the likes of Von Braun, which were later fully developed by NASA. Goddard couldn't get USA interested in rockets, the Nazis did, that's history odd as it is.
Why can't we explore and have Passion for discovery anymore? So what if its not practical I would be proud to live during these flights. I hope my generation will revisit this inspiration.
@Roflzmahwoflz As a kid I lived through and watched Gemini flights and Apollo. When the flights went up school stopped. We went to other class rooms to watch. Schools only had a couple Tvs back then. America was proud of what we did.I think one of the greatest quotes of all times was JFK ." America chooses to go to the moon not because its easy,America chooses to go to the moon because it's hard." Everyone wants it easy today. We could never get there again.
@michaeljyu - Actually, the most powerful engine goes to the Russian RD-170, but only barely. The F-1 produces 1,740,134 lbf, while the RD-170 produces 1,773,000 lbf. The F-1, however, did it with a single combustion chamber, while the Russians used 4. They mastered multi-chambered engines back in the 50's, and with the issues we had getting combustion stability with the F-1, no surprise they by-passed it with the smaller chamber cluster.
to bulletbikeflame. it's definitely the Saturn 5, the 4 at 0.25 of this video is number 4 ground securing arm. take a look at 0.21, that is number 1 ground securing arm.
@BulletBikeFlameFlyer The rocket wasn't named the Saturn V because it came fifth in a sequence of Saturn I, Saturn II, Saturn III. The Silverstein considered three classes of configurations for the rocket, designated Saturn A, Saturn B, and Saturn C, and individual configurations were then numbered Saturn C-1, Saturn C-2, Saturn C-3. The Saturn V was originally Saturn C-5. So there is a design that, if it had been used, would have been called Saturn IV, but it was never built and launched.
I went from a 75lb computer screen to a 23" lcd...first thing that popped into my mind. LOVE THIS VIDEO, public and kids need to be shown these things.
So to all the moon landing hoax morons out there... You're saying that the Apollo 13 explosion, aborted mission and year plus delay was an orchestrated failure designed to give the program a taste of can't-win-em-all authenticity? Was Apollo 8 a hoax too? Maybe we've never even put anything into orbit!! Can you prove we ever have? Sure the rocket went into the sky, but once you lost sight of it, maybe it just fell back into the ocean a few miles away. Don't let skepticism make you a fool.
@nonsuchfabio so, what makes you think they DIDNT land on the moon? what makes you think that humans arent capable of surviving a trip to the moon while scientists have already discovered numerous galaxy Trillions of lightyears away,... i think landing on the moon is a piece of cake by now...
@weetnietgeen I think you need to read my post again. Anyone who thinks we DIDNT land on the moon 6 times during the Apollo program is a moron. These 'skeptics' have inane explanations for why they think we didn't, but if you turn the tables on them, they admit that they can't substantiate what they believe any better than anyone else, or resort to ad hominem attacks or circular reasoning..
@nonsuchfabio I have heard it seriously argued that Stanley Kubrick left the project due to creative differences with NASA over his Apollo 13 script, which featured a dramatic oxygen tank rupture requiring the mission to be aborted, an idea NASA ultimately decided to use.
@MrSokrat2010 and yet.....how did NASA keep the thousands of mouths shut to perpetrate the hoax, let alone the astronauts that went to the moon? You just want to provoke a fight.
absolutely incredible!!!!...... the most powerful rocket engines ever made the rocketdyne F1 engine, each engine developing 1.5 million pounds of thrust so 7.5 million pounds of thrust total, which is staggering when you compare that to a boeing 747 engine at full power of 58,000 pounds of thrust.
@johhnysenor -- Orbital velocity of the moon is only 4000 miles per hour. The ascent stage of the lunar module was about 10,000 pounds mass. About half of that was fuel. But that is only about 1,700 pounds of weight on the moon. The rocket had a thrust of 3,500 pounds. At an acclleration of about 1/3g (1/3 of the force you feel sitting in your chair on Earth) it would have taken only about 9 minutes of burning its rocket motor to get up to the 4,000 mph orbital velocity.
Truly a remarkable achievement. Whatever the initial motives for doing it, the exploration of the moon (and space in general) is a noble endeavor, and the men and women who made such journeys possible are heroes, each and every one.
Not true, it was the Nazi's that had the idea of Much aado about Nothing and call it a space program with the name NASA/Nasah the theif to rob the public tax payers metalfrost!
Don't use your pathetic Nazi reverse psychology crap on me nyyankees4296, just cause you can't tollerate Common Sense and Logic dosn't give you the right to throw your ental health conditions onto innocent people, I'm not your scapegoat, COMPREHENDI?
Beauty is Nefertiti, psalm 50:3 of the Bible, not NASA's ilogical crap, cause only a half brain would call a SFX NASA movie a Beauty mycatwilatackyou!
Currently, we dn't have a reason to go past our own orbit. I think that because it is naturally an expensive endeavor, only a relative few people will go into space at any given time. I see space in the future as a separate ecnomy, due to the fact that shipping csts out of our atmsphere will make only cmputer sftware and high precision prducts viable trade items with space colonists. Not long after the first miners or whatever establish self sustaining bases, they'll be flying a new flag.
I wish that all the space programs could just combine resources to build a rocket like this again. One of these beasts could like 3/4 of the ISS and it would be cheaper. :)
Still an awesome experience to see even after 40 years! I visited the Saturn V at the Kennedy Space Centre for the 1st time last July. On it's side it doesn't look so long and sleek as at lift-off.
@crucialconflict02 I completely agree. Whenever I get stressed about my classes, I just watch this video and it reminds me how much I want my BME. (Bachlor's in Mech. Engineering)
Awesome! Those five F-1 engines in the first stage consume 15 tons of propellents per second (yes, 30,000 lbs. per second), 7 1/2 million pounds of thrust in all.
Its the quickest way to toast about 1500 slices of bread all at once,stick them under the big exhaust pipes for a micronanosecond,pull them out,and stick another 1500 under,thats 3000 slices of toast in 2 micronanoseconds....
I dont actually belive that weve even been to the moon, we did it in 1969, thats the only time ive heard about, i know weve been back after that but if we had the shit technology then, im sure now in 2010 we should be going every year? Sommat fishy going on i think, but dont get me wrong, i love space.
@haguey666: What about Apollo 8 in 1968? Or Apollo 10 a few months before Apollo 11? What about Apollo 12, in November of 1969? Then Apollo 13, the only mission in 1970? Then Apollo 14 and 15, in 1971? And finally, Apollo 16 and 17, both in 1972. And if the later missions hadn't been canceled, all the way into 1974 we would've been going to the Moon. In fact, "canceled" is the key word. Apollo Applications would've put bases on the Moon and people on Mars in 1986, but was canceled by Nixon.
@Tyrannobeast Yes i know they have been back, but i mean, with this day and age recording equipment why havent we seen a HD moon landing? Why all the blurry and fuzzy videos, we have come a long way since the 60's and 70's. The only explanation is is that we will never know why, so there is no point in people thinking they know the reason why, as if they have inside information from NASA or sommat, you and all the rest know the same as anyone else, jack shit, its a need to know basis, thats that
@haguey666: What do you mean? Having HD recording equipment does not mean we have time machines. We can't record the Moon landings in HD because they occurred before HD recording equipment even existed. Plus the TV signals were degraded by the time they traveled 1/4 million miles back to Earth, so even by Apollo 17 a bit of degradation would occur. In any case LRO took pictures of every landing site there is, but I'm sure you discount this because LRO was built and paid for by NASA.
@Tyrannobeast Liston there should be a simple explanation, i dont want to hear all of your mumbo jumbo, are you stephen hawkins or sommat? Why are we not going to the moon? we did it 30 yrs ago, we should be going alot more often now. I heard its because the moon is riddled with aliens and we was warned not to go back, with those flashing lights or sommat in 1969.
@haguey666: I used perfectly simple English. And as I said, there are millions of Americans who say, "We should spend money down here, not up there." For the politicians to get re-elected, they follow these people, because like it or not they're the majority in the U.S. If the Politicians were to spend large sums of money to get to the Moon quickly, they'd never be re-elected, and re-election is the only goal of any politician.
@haguey666: That's the plain and simple answer to why we haven't been to the Moon in almost 40 years, because the people in power won't let it happen.
@Tyrannobeast Also.... the video that every person in america saw that night was from a video camera pointed at another tv screen because the video feed was not able to be broadcasted (different format or fps or whatever) anyways. I believe every copy of the moon landing today is from a video recording of a tv camera pointed at a monitor.
@haguey666: So what do you want? A commercial spacecraft's photos of the sites? That just might happen with the Google Lunar X Prize. Would that not be good enough? If not, what do you want done? How about you commision a team to take you down to the bottom of the Atlantic to see all the spent Saturn V S-1C stages (although it's unlikely they would be in single pieces after a 40-mile drop). I'm sure you would discount the remains, calling them "planted."
@haguey666: I've met several Apollo Astronauts who sour at the mention of Moon hoaxers. Certainly not fear of being "found out," but barely restrained rage that those who know nothing of their epic and dangerous journey would be so quick to discount their most cherished and rare memories. Do a service to these Astronauts and the people who put their life into accomplishing a Human dream that was for so long out of reach by re-examining the evidence with an unbiased mind.
@haguey666: Then the Constellation Program, the human Lunar/Martian program that started in 2004. It has many of the goals of the Apollo Applications Program but with far more capable technology and planned a return to the Moon in 2019. Now Obama is trying to have it canceled because "We've been to the Moon." It doesn't matter if we have far better technology, NASA's not going to got to the Moon if the stinking Politicians won't let them. There is absolutely nothing fishy going on but politics.
This has been flagged as spam show
I have created a music album which charts the history of the Space Race.
Space Race by Rhesus Monkey.
The album charts the start of the Space Race with Sputnik 1957, Yuri Gagarin's first human space flight, John Glenn's Triple Orbit, Ed White's Gemini IV Space Walk, then onto Apollo.
You can view videos of three tracks from the album within my YouTube channel.
The videos include NASA archive material.
rhesusmonkey2012 4 weeks ago
Its ice
jakebrake4343 1 month ago
That America was able to pull this off in 1969 still blows my mind. Oh and I watched it on TV at 9 years old.
Ionizap 1 month ago
@Ionizap me too dude they was at war at the time,, when i watch judge judy i just can,t believe they did it
Hannible100 1 month ago
What are those chips falling off the rocket?
toxboxic 1 month ago
@toxboxic Thats ice dude
Hannible100 1 month ago
@toxboxic
Umm Ice?
suzakule 1 week ago
the falling ice is beautiful
TheEmuTyrant 2 months ago
whats the white stuff falling off the rocket. paint?
Ihdc1 2 months ago
@Ihdc1 Ice
TheGfRep 2 months ago
@Ihdc1 Ice. The whole outside of the rocket formed ice all over it due to the fact that the fuels were kept very cold, causing the ice to form on the external surfaces of the rocket.
HarryTAdkins 2 months ago
I put this to some cool music...
youtube.com/watch?v=iBHA4CCjWVU
warlordjosh 2 months ago
This video needs some epic music.
simoncpu 2 months ago
@simoncpu Here you go. I heard this song on the radio today and thought it would be good for something. Then I came across this video. Like peanut butter and chocolate. youtube.com/watch?v=iBHA4CCjWVU
warlordjosh 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Shit, I actually dont like to admit US superiority in any part of space industry or science , but Saturn-V is one big motherfucking sick rocket. Its first stage even called S-IC )))))
And by the way, the most powerful liquid rocket engine is not F-1, its Russian RD-170 please admit that too ;)
Fantomas24ARM 3 months ago 7
Comment removed
Fantomas24ARM 3 months ago 3
OMG, but that's pretty to watch! Reminds me of a day when Americans had a pair and knew how to swing 'em.
transquesta 3 months ago
Saturn V doesn't lift off, it pushes the Earth backwards
ozzymuzzy246 3 months ago
10 time more expensive than the space shuttle
Awesome2482 3 months ago
@Awesome2482, Actually, after development and tooling costs were complete, if they had kept the booster in production, this would have been MUCH CHEAPER than the Space Shuttle.
For instance, it would have take only about 5 Saturn V launches to heft the entire ISS into orbit, and each section could have been much bigger than what they have up there now.
Shuttle is "reusable" but major portions of it must be re-built before each launch. It's horrendously more expensive than it was planned to be.
prosperomage 2 months ago
what a mighty rocket,long live apollo
guitarnashelter 3 months ago
I watched every Apollo mission launch there was when I was growing up, and it still makes my spine tingle thinking there are three guys sitting at the top of that thing in a capsule no bigger than a VW Beetle. 8-)
Jackle61 3 months ago
Да это полная хуйня! Русские лучше!
Zukalt1 4 months ago
@Zukalt1 LOL....nope.....with all respect for the Russian space-program....this one is the most awesome rocket ever built......hands down. And for the record, I'm not a USA-fan.
Ojoe2010 3 months ago in playlist Video's die door Ojoe2010 aan de favorieten zijn toegevoegd
@Zukalt1 И все же, русские никогда не делали это на Луну. Хм, интересно, чей ракеты были лучше?
johnnypowell859 3 months ago
@johnnypowell859 Лучшие ракеты - от русских. Ваш Спейс Шаттл больше не летает, а наш "Союз" до сих пор летает.
Zukalt1 3 months ago
@Zukalt1 -- Our space shuttle should never have been built in the first place. It was horrendously more expensive than it was predicted to be.
If we were actually serious about space, we should have kept the Saturn V in production. It could have hefted the entire ISS into orbit with 4 or 5 launches.
But we (our government) are too stupid and our projects are driven too much by politics and getting money for re-election.
prosperomage 2 months ago
@prosperomage Такая же проблема и у нас в России. Наш Путин и Медведев разрушают Россию. Все наши политики глупы.
Zukalt1 2 months ago
@Zukalt1 Мы молимся за Россию ;)
LunarTuner 4 days ago
@prosperomage
shuttle is cool ,it was not shuttle fault but budget problem,i am not from USA but i am sad to see that NASA year budget is like a week budget of military.NASA is the best and most positive USA brand and people in USA dont understand that.
dzonikg 1 month ago
111 meters tall.........powered by the most powerfull engines ever......that thing is simply terrifying........
Ojoe2010 4 months ago
WALT DISNEY BULLSHIT
PtAltmVansanTarr 4 months ago
The peak of human civilization.
yugozastava13 4 months ago in playlist saturn 60
HONKY!!!!!!! INCREDIBLE!!!!!!!
mrmikespence1964 4 months ago
I'm not usually a fan of a transient,fault-ridden &predatory species like homo sapiens.However, this footage records a stunning achievement.
TheDosshouse 6 months ago
Moon conspiracy theorists need to punched by Buzz Aldrin. LOL
pilipinasmabuhay100 6 months ago
Happy Hoax anniversary !
potrodsas 6 months ago
Why do people think the moon landing was fake in my opinion it's like saying we Faked Osama Bin Laden's death or 9/11 was all done by the Government. Do you part and research it, and please don't go to some Hoax website.
pvtsoap262 6 months ago
Wow' technology!
jfdomega 6 months ago
The American writer Robert KG Temple says that there is now no one alive who actually knows how to fire the engines!
krelllabs 6 months ago
@krelllabs Hoooey. NASA documents their processes with an insane level of detail.
hekidanjo 6 months ago
@hekidanjo You miss the point. There are documents for all kinds of procedures - the question is how many people KNOW the material and can do the procedure. Scientific and engineering know-how get lost all too easily.
krelllabs 6 months ago
Shit is awesome
Keithmurray23 6 months ago
fucking beautiful.
JoeTelevisheown 7 months ago
That's what separates us from the red chinks...and all dem other losers!!
KeithP357 7 months ago
@KeithP357 That only the United States and Russia had (and still have) the resources to even attempt this endeavor is primarily a matter of chance and history. We're all human beings, and Apollo, Soyuz, the Space Shuttle, the ISS all belong to everyone who wishes humanity well. The sooner we get away from the "us vs. them" mentality, the sooner we can move on to even grander things—as a species.
TaintedMustard 6 months ago
2:11 EPIC
BlazingAngels220099 7 months ago
At 2:44 onwards, a stunning sight of pure power, pure horsepower, pure thrust.
ROCKSOLID19 7 months ago
The greatest achievement of America was the fact they put the word "HOAX"next to the name "Moon" in all the encyclopedias and dictionaries.
potrodsas 7 months ago
Graham1786 You are so right dude. 9/11 was a government conspirisy too. Elvis is living with Marylin Monroe on a secret island. Moon landings were so fake and JFK was hit by ..... Well we all know the answer to that one. IMF when will people wake up to the truth? It's a mad world A MAD WORLD!!!!!! No one really talks about the aliens in New Mexico ,,,,, another cover up. Just one question Graham,,, are you on the same medication as the rest of us fools?
JDherts 7 months ago
on what basis the U.S. government ukryvalo member of a criminal organization CC
HEBCKIY 7 months ago
Werner von Braun, the father of the American Space Program Since 1933 Werner von Braun wore a black form of the 4 th Cavalry Squadron 6 th Regiment SS.24 December 1944, Hitler awarded the Werner von Braun's "Knight's Cross with Swords"
HEBCKIY 7 months ago
awesome peace of filming,,have watched it several times now
SuperJammygit 7 months ago
Germans you just cant stay mad at them.
cassius969 7 months ago 2
Great vid...shame they had to fake the moon landings
Graham1786 7 months ago
what a beautiful sound...
Harvin87 7 months ago
SCIENCE!!!
Folma7 7 months ago
Like Id want a shirt....
timbertable 7 months ago
AMAZING what man can do!!!!!! People ask why Niel Armstrong is so humble and meek about what he did,, seeing this, he knows it was not just him but thousands that put him on the MOON.
standuprayray 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
More water on the moon than ever expected.
Watch my featured video.
New discovery Moon could have as much water as Earth
OVERLOADInformation 8 months ago
My Dad was the contractor for the Saturn V engines - he was a Col. in the Air Force...pretty cool growing up with the space program.
MsAudrey20 9 months ago
Finally, a video decent audio on the 1st stage.
Armigo91 9 months ago
10 people are mad russians because they didn't get to the moon before us!
GhostFilms2010 9 months ago 2
@GhostFilms2010 The entire human race got to the moon*
annyonghaseyo90 4 months ago
cant believe this is more then 40 years ago already...
mikessingh1 9 months ago
Murderous
nmadden2 9 months ago
@1:48
32445k 9 months ago
AMAZING !
paolonove65 9 months ago
9 communists watched this movie
jakecardigan 9 months ago
9 communists watched this movie
jakecardigan 9 months ago
190,000,000 Horse power. For you Coors Light drinkers thats over 20,000,000 NASCARs running all out
sickofm23 10 months ago
@sickofm23 Are u sure that the result is right? 190M / X = 20M => X = 9.5 ... I bet that NASCAR car has more than 9.5hp ;)
cartmanxxx 10 months ago
mankind #WINNING .....
betterthanever2 10 months ago
This looks like it was more than a little influenced by the rocket launch sequence from For All Mankind (wHccHMHVomo). Great film.
cengime 10 months ago
A tribute to American engineering, made in USA. Goddard likely would have been impressed, recall that it was the American Goddard who made the world's first successful liquid-fueled rocket. The location It is at 20 Upland Street, Auburn, Massachusetts. It was Goddards efforts that were later further developed by the likes of Von Braun, which were later fully developed by NASA. Goddard couldn't get USA interested in rockets, the Nazis did, that's history odd as it is.
starview1 11 months ago
Just curious, are those icicles falling? Maybe perhaps it comes from loading the cryogenic fuel?
gradenko23 11 months ago
@gradenko23 It's build up ice that come from the air's humidity.
Alexvideoclip 11 months ago
@Alexvideoclip Yea but he was saying where did the ice come from... it's from cryogenic fuel.
aerowenn 9 months ago
Why can't we explore and have Passion for discovery anymore? So what if its not practical I would be proud to live during these flights. I hope my generation will revisit this inspiration.
Roflzmahwoflz 11 months ago
@Roflzmahwoflz As a kid I lived through and watched Gemini flights and Apollo. When the flights went up school stopped. We went to other class rooms to watch. Schools only had a couple Tvs back then. America was proud of what we did.I think one of the greatest quotes of all times was JFK ." America chooses to go to the moon not because its easy,America chooses to go to the moon because it's hard." Everyone wants it easy today. We could never get there again.
sickofm23 10 months ago
does anyone else get chills when "USA" goes up the screen at 2:11?
crucialconflict02 11 months ago
The most powerful engine ever. About 190 MILLION horsepower. About 40 years later it's still the most powerful engine.
michaeljyu 11 months ago 45
@michaeljyu - Actually, the most powerful engine goes to the Russian RD-170, but only barely. The F-1 produces 1,740,134 lbf, while the RD-170 produces 1,773,000 lbf. The F-1, however, did it with a single combustion chamber, while the Russians used 4. They mastered multi-chambered engines back in the 50's, and with the issues we had getting combustion stability with the F-1, no surprise they by-passed it with the smaller chamber cluster.
downix 10 months ago
@michaeljyu the most powerful KNOWN human built engine; surely there are other more powerful thrust machines out there.
eikichi2009 9 months ago
@michaeljyu
N1 was even more powerful, although it hadn't managed to reach space...
H123Laci 6 months ago
@michaeljyu 190 million horsepower... so american
jordododo 5 months ago 9
@jordododo And a bit German :)
pe6obutilkata 5 days ago
@michaeljyu and the most ineffiecient
MidasRK 5 months ago
Comment removed
michaeljyu 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Most powerful engine ever! About 190 million horse power! 40 years later it's still the most powerful engine!
michaeljyu 11 months ago
Comment removed
michaeljyu 11 months ago
Chuck Norris ran home and cried 0:13
tlages 11 months ago
One word: Badass!
braincrisp1 11 months ago
the damn thing wont win in a drag race, that's for sure! But, it sure will outrun anything during the journey to the outer hemispheres!
OrbitalEnterprise 1 year ago
to bulletbikeflame. it's definitely the Saturn 5, the 4 at 0.25 of this video is number 4 ground securing arm. take a look at 0.21, that is number 1 ground securing arm.
w1h2i3t4h5a6m7 1 year ago
James May in his documentary sad that the Saturn V rocket is the most complicated thing man has ever built. Is it?
kaupunkimoukari 1 year ago
all very well, but actually was the saturn 4 launch. look at 0:25
BulletBikeFlameFlyer 1 year ago
@BulletBikeFlameFlyer The rocket wasn't named the Saturn V because it came fifth in a sequence of Saturn I, Saturn II, Saturn III. The Silverstein considered three classes of configurations for the rocket, designated Saturn A, Saturn B, and Saturn C, and individual configurations were then numbered Saturn C-1, Saturn C-2, Saturn C-3. The Saturn V was originally Saturn C-5. So there is a design that, if it had been used, would have been called Saturn IV, but it was never built and launched.
cengime 10 months ago
What an AWESOME video...
Cheops2112 1 year ago
american muscle machine, made by german ingenuity.
bombarderoazul 1 year ago 3
Amazing what man can achieve when he allows himself to think freely.
redsquarephoto 1 year ago 3
Heavy Metal Thunder
gbailey0 1 year ago
Heavy Metal Thunder
gbailey0 1 year ago
MICROWAVELATCH
ECLOVETHISVIDEO0:23
MICROWAVELATCH
GelandnaleG 1 year ago
I went from a 75lb computer screen to a 23" lcd...first thing that popped into my mind. LOVE THIS VIDEO, public and kids need to be shown these things.
krazyblurtzcrx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The moon missions were faked in a studio. Here's a link to some of the evidence.
3W's (dot) spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487
Cosmored2 1 year ago
So to all the moon landing hoax morons out there... You're saying that the Apollo 13 explosion, aborted mission and year plus delay was an orchestrated failure designed to give the program a taste of can't-win-em-all authenticity? Was Apollo 8 a hoax too? Maybe we've never even put anything into orbit!! Can you prove we ever have? Sure the rocket went into the sky, but once you lost sight of it, maybe it just fell back into the ocean a few miles away. Don't let skepticism make you a fool.
nonsuchfabio 1 year ago
@nonsuchfabio so, what makes you think they DIDNT land on the moon? what makes you think that humans arent capable of surviving a trip to the moon while scientists have already discovered numerous galaxy Trillions of lightyears away,... i think landing on the moon is a piece of cake by now...
weetnietgeen 1 year ago
@weetnietgeen I think you need to read my post again. Anyone who thinks we DIDNT land on the moon 6 times during the Apollo program is a moron. These 'skeptics' have inane explanations for why they think we didn't, but if you turn the tables on them, they admit that they can't substantiate what they believe any better than anyone else, or resort to ad hominem attacks or circular reasoning..
nonsuchfabio 1 year ago
@nonsuchfabio right, sorry :) why not send them on a one way shuttle trip? that'll solve the problem wouldnt it?
weetnietgeen 1 year ago
@nonsuchfabio I have heard it seriously argued that Stanley Kubrick left the project due to creative differences with NASA over his Apollo 13 script, which featured a dramatic oxygen tank rupture requiring the mission to be aborted, an idea NASA ultimately decided to use.
cengime 10 months ago
American muscle machine. Superb.
h1aa 1 year ago
There must be a way less expensive to go to the space.
doormagic 1 year ago
@doormagic FEDEX
sickofm23 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
apollo - hoax
MrSokrat2010 1 year ago
@MrSokrat2010 and yet.....how did NASA keep the thousands of mouths shut to perpetrate the hoax, let alone the astronauts that went to the moon? You just want to provoke a fight.
thepowerhouse4u 1 year ago 3
interesting how the remains of the "hoax" are clearly visible using earth based telescopes......how did all those lunar rovers get on the moon!!!!!
gbailey0 1 year ago
absolutely incredible!!!!...... the most powerful rocket engines ever made the rocketdyne F1 engine, each engine developing 1.5 million pounds of thrust so 7.5 million pounds of thrust total, which is staggering when you compare that to a boeing 747 engine at full power of 58,000 pounds of thrust.
baza7008 1 year ago
@nesokretep
I see it now. Thanks.
AfterHourGamer 1 year ago
Uh. Everything about the moon landing convinces me that it really happened BESIDES.
How did such a small module reach escape velocity off the moon?
Btw, amazing rocket, just so much energy pouring out of there, I cant take it. :P
johhnysenor 1 year ago
@johhnysenor -- Orbital velocity of the moon is only 4000 miles per hour. The ascent stage of the lunar module was about 10,000 pounds mass. About half of that was fuel. But that is only about 1,700 pounds of weight on the moon. The rocket had a thrust of 3,500 pounds. At an acclleration of about 1/3g (1/3 of the force you feel sitting in your chair on Earth) it would have taken only about 9 minutes of burning its rocket motor to get up to the 4,000 mph orbital velocity.
nesokretep 1 year ago
SOOO MUCHHH THRUST!!!!
thisucksayeee 1 year ago
I am proud, as a human, for this technological marvel.
Sic itur ad astra.
GR8TM4N 1 year ago
Truly a remarkable achievement. Whatever the initial motives for doing it, the exploration of the moon (and space in general) is a noble endeavor, and the men and women who made such journeys possible are heroes, each and every one.
okankyoto 1 year ago 46
And all that just because the russians had the same idea of going to the moon first instead of the US. I hope that moonsand had special features..
metalfrost 1 year ago
Not true, it was the Nazi's that had the idea of Much aado about Nothing and call it a space program with the name NASA/Nasah the theif to rob the public tax payers metalfrost!
KaOssis 1 year ago
@KaOssis your the one who keeps commenting on this video like a person who has OCD
nyyankees4296 1 year ago
Don't use your pathetic Nazi reverse psychology crap on me nyyankees4296, just cause you can't tollerate Common Sense and Logic dosn't give you the right to throw your ental health conditions onto innocent people, I'm not your scapegoat, COMPREHENDI?
KaOssis 1 year ago
@KaOssis im 14 im not a nazi
nyyankees4296 1 year ago
So you joined October 2008 when you were 12yr's old and breached Youtube age policy then nyyankees4296..you old git!
KaOssis 1 year ago
@KaOssis who cares about youtube age policy???
nyyankees4296 1 year ago
It really is a thing of beauty
mycatwilatackyou 1 year ago
Beauty is Nefertiti, psalm 50:3 of the Bible, not NASA's ilogical crap, cause only a half brain would call a SFX NASA movie a Beauty mycatwilatackyou!
KaOssis 1 year ago
@KaOssis The SFX are amazing hahaha , way to go Disney
mycatwilatackyou 1 year ago
imagine this liftoff with
this flight tonight - nazareth ;)
that's Awesome
JheakrynaKyAlur 1 year ago
spectacular !!!
GiovaniB52 1 year ago
The fucking glory days in the American history.
I hope there will be some of them again!
ledaf41 1 year ago
You Yanks tend to overuse the word 'awesome', but when you get it right you really get it right. That really was A W E S O M E ! ! !
I never get bored of watching a Saturn V take off. You are and should be proud of doing something truly amazing.
glassandbrass 1 year ago
well that was fucking incredible :)
so when are we going to Mars?
FreedomLiberty21 1 year ago
Fuckin beautiful.
thatguy1145 1 year ago
Epic!
BRADtheAV8R 1 year ago
Currently, we dn't have a reason to go past our own orbit. I think that because it is naturally an expensive endeavor, only a relative few people will go into space at any given time. I see space in the future as a separate ecnomy, due to the fact that shipping csts out of our atmsphere will make only cmputer sftware and high precision prducts viable trade items with space colonists. Not long after the first miners or whatever establish self sustaining bases, they'll be flying a new flag.
jag9998 1 year ago
@jag9998 Colonization, baby! That's why the U.S. is flying it's own flag!
number3burt 11 months ago
I wish that all the space programs could just combine resources to build a rocket like this again. One of these beasts could like 3/4 of the ISS and it would be cheaper. :)
iman2341 1 year ago
One giant leap for humans
directorlog 1 year ago
Still an awesome experience to see even after 40 years! I visited the Saturn V at the Kennedy Space Centre for the 1st time last July. On it's side it doesn't look so long and sleek as at lift-off.
david45121 1 year ago
The greatest technological marval invented.
senrat94 1 year ago
at 2:14 U S A !!!
ITILII 1 year ago
Jk lol
jfdomega 1 year ago
Who's chuck Norris?
jfdomega 1 year ago
watching thi snever gets old. all of that RAW power!
crucialconflict02 1 year ago 20
@crucialconflict02 Actually, it's highly controlled and focused power, that's why it worked. And that's really what so amazing.
StereoSpace 1 year ago
@StereoSpace, your sooo easily duped by a fake movie arn't you!
KaOssis 1 year ago
@crucialconflict02THATS SO RIGHT
airdaleva42 11 months ago
@crucialconflict02 I completely agree. Whenever I get stressed about my classes, I just watch this video and it reminds me how much I want my BME. (Bachlor's in Mech. Engineering)
suomik1988 11 months ago
@suomik1988 go for it. best of luck to you.
crucialconflict02 11 months ago
Awesome! Those five F-1 engines in the first stage consume 15 tons of propellents per second (yes, 30,000 lbs. per second), 7 1/2 million pounds of thrust in all.
donpjen515 1 year ago
Its the quickest way to toast about 1500 slices of bread all at once,stick them under the big exhaust pipes for a micronanosecond,pull them out,and stick another 1500 under,thats 3000 slices of toast in 2 micronanoseconds....
FredGreenbucket100 1 year ago
Such a amazing sight ,
it is the only this that makes me regret not to be a american
long live NASA
serpentasgard 1 year ago
I dont actually belive that weve even been to the moon, we did it in 1969, thats the only time ive heard about, i know weve been back after that but if we had the shit technology then, im sure now in 2010 we should be going every year? Sommat fishy going on i think, but dont get me wrong, i love space.
haguey666 1 year ago
@haguey666
Yeah, well, we decided that funding the war in Afghanistan was more important.
kamikaze6000 1 year ago
@haguey666: What about Apollo 8 in 1968? Or Apollo 10 a few months before Apollo 11? What about Apollo 12, in November of 1969? Then Apollo 13, the only mission in 1970? Then Apollo 14 and 15, in 1971? And finally, Apollo 16 and 17, both in 1972. And if the later missions hadn't been canceled, all the way into 1974 we would've been going to the Moon. In fact, "canceled" is the key word. Apollo Applications would've put bases on the Moon and people on Mars in 1986, but was canceled by Nixon.
Tyrannobeast 1 year ago
@Tyrannobeast Yes i know they have been back, but i mean, with this day and age recording equipment why havent we seen a HD moon landing? Why all the blurry and fuzzy videos, we have come a long way since the 60's and 70's. The only explanation is is that we will never know why, so there is no point in people thinking they know the reason why, as if they have inside information from NASA or sommat, you and all the rest know the same as anyone else, jack shit, its a need to know basis, thats that
haguey666 1 year ago
@haguey666: What do you mean? Having HD recording equipment does not mean we have time machines. We can't record the Moon landings in HD because they occurred before HD recording equipment even existed. Plus the TV signals were degraded by the time they traveled 1/4 million miles back to Earth, so even by Apollo 17 a bit of degradation would occur. In any case LRO took pictures of every landing site there is, but I'm sure you discount this because LRO was built and paid for by NASA.
Tyrannobeast 1 year ago
@Tyrannobeast Liston there should be a simple explanation, i dont want to hear all of your mumbo jumbo, are you stephen hawkins or sommat? Why are we not going to the moon? we did it 30 yrs ago, we should be going alot more often now. I heard its because the moon is riddled with aliens and we was warned not to go back, with those flashing lights or sommat in 1969.
haguey666 1 year ago
@haguey666: I used perfectly simple English. And as I said, there are millions of Americans who say, "We should spend money down here, not up there." For the politicians to get re-elected, they follow these people, because like it or not they're the majority in the U.S. If the Politicians were to spend large sums of money to get to the Moon quickly, they'd never be re-elected, and re-election is the only goal of any politician.
Tyrannobeast 1 year ago
@haguey666: That's the plain and simple answer to why we haven't been to the Moon in almost 40 years, because the people in power won't let it happen.
Tyrannobeast 1 year ago
@Tyrannobeast Also.... the video that every person in america saw that night was from a video camera pointed at another tv screen because the video feed was not able to be broadcasted (different format or fps or whatever) anyways. I believe every copy of the moon landing today is from a video recording of a tv camera pointed at a monitor.
KourtlandtP 1 year ago
@haguey666: So what do you want? A commercial spacecraft's photos of the sites? That just might happen with the Google Lunar X Prize. Would that not be good enough? If not, what do you want done? How about you commision a team to take you down to the bottom of the Atlantic to see all the spent Saturn V S-1C stages (although it's unlikely they would be in single pieces after a 40-mile drop). I'm sure you would discount the remains, calling them "planted."
Tyrannobeast 1 year ago
@haguey666: I've met several Apollo Astronauts who sour at the mention of Moon hoaxers. Certainly not fear of being "found out," but barely restrained rage that those who know nothing of their epic and dangerous journey would be so quick to discount their most cherished and rare memories. Do a service to these Astronauts and the people who put their life into accomplishing a Human dream that was for so long out of reach by re-examining the evidence with an unbiased mind.
Tyrannobeast 1 year ago
@haguey666: Oh, that's right. Can't think of a good answer, it must be a conspiracy.
Where have they been hiding the HD video of Columbus' landing?
puncheex 1 year ago
@haguey666: Then the Constellation Program, the human Lunar/Martian program that started in 2004. It has many of the goals of the Apollo Applications Program but with far more capable technology and planned a return to the Moon in 2019. Now Obama is trying to have it canceled because "We've been to the Moon." It doesn't matter if we have far better technology, NASA's not going to got to the Moon if the stinking Politicians won't let them. There is absolutely nothing fishy going on but politics.
Tyrannobeast 1 year ago
@fverag fuck you, commie.
letmusicfillyoursoul 1 year ago
TAKE THAT RUSSIA!
soar313 1 year ago
8 people clicked the dislike button. I bet I can name them (includes Obama).
LyriMetacurl 1 year ago
@LyriMetacurl Mrs Obama as well
blagger56 1 year ago
want to go to space? we don't fuck around, we PUNCH THE SKY AND TRY TO KILL IT!
Guyect 1 year ago
what is all the falling debris? it looks kind of flaky...
MrPLOXPLOXPLOX 1 year ago