Scientist photographed soul leaving the body in death

[tony671]

bullshit

[sonykroket]

Look honey, irrational pseudoscientific superstitious clowns!

How cute

[weelittledragon]

Ooh... pretty colors....

Not exactly credible stuff, now is it?

[Keownolomio]

I'm going be honest, I only let the video play from start to finish because I liked the music arrangement of Pachelbel's Canon.

[faircompetition1]

Interesting , but we really have no idea what we are actually seeing do we? Seems a little premature to call it the soul. Naturally if this is at all legitimate it will be thoroughly researched -we all would love to find that we do have an eternal soul. I will await the peer reviewed journals as well

[TheNomad1970]

What a waste of time, a juxtaposition of new age images and a written interview set to mood music. I wish this guy could photograph what a time bandit you are.

[orbnorian]

Once again, no real evidence for a human soul. Surprise, surprise.

[pat5168]

@orbnorian My dad acted so shocked when he realized I don't believe we have souls. "If I don't have a soul....Than what's listening when I think?" FACEPALM

[orbnorian]

@pat5168: LMAO That's a good one. That one belongs in a book of quote's.

[psycho3968]

tree hugging hippies!

[influxrift]

I can make the same pictures on my Mac. Maybe I've really just been talking to spirits all this time.

[AronRa]

No comments? Why am I not surprised? I'll withhold judgement until I read in peer reviewed journals.

[1GODISNOWHERE1]

@AronRa By "peer" do you actually mean someone you can only agree with based on your bias that also supports your theories and others like them from your circle of influence?

[AronRa]

@1GODISNOWHERE1 The realm of science has its share of controversy.  The way to become rich or famous in science is to challenge the status quo. But science is far less conflicted than religion because we know how to minimize or eliminate bias, and to base all our claims on verifiable evidence rather than unsubstantiated assertions of suppositions. Men are free to disagree, but if you have actual factual substance behind your opposition, then you have no position, no argument against it.

[firelord699]

@AronRa Until someone finds evidence against it?

[thiago88smart]

@AronRa Sorry but they'll NEVER publish this like you expect. They want to keep the "secret" apart from normal people, so the understanding "normal" people will have about the world is limited, therefore being easier to manipulate dumb people through the goverment.