Funny (sorta) that the premise forming the foundation of this argument has never been proven. Ah, what's the point? Nobody cares that the premise came from a government that has shown itself to be a total liar. It's just an easy position to hold & the vast majority requires no proof & no accountability for a govt & military (if you believe the official story) that failed colossally on 9/11.. "Gubb-ment said it, I believe it, that settles it."
Yes, all people have human rights to life, liberty, and property, but it is wrong for the government of the US to force Americans to pay for the liberty of others. The government should only defend those who pay for it.
Of course, the government shouldn't really exist anyway; a private defense company would be sure only to protect those who paid for protection.
Funny (sorta) that the premise forming the foundation of this argument has never been proven. Ah, what's the point? Nobody cares that the premise came from a government that has shown itself to be a total liar. It's just an easy position to hold & the vast majority requires no proof & no accountability for a govt & military (if you believe the official story) that failed colossally on 9/11.. "Gubb-ment said it, I believe it, that settles it."
restoresoundmoney 2 months ago
it has to be sped up, the body movements are fast to
mikizzle1 3 months ago
Why does it seem like Ron Paul is sped up?
Paulintheoh8 1 year ago
Ron Paul is the only one worth listening to.
xMaXiMuSx 1 year ago
this guy is a reptilian bastard phsyco
nphillips4000 1 year ago
Yes, all people have human rights to life, liberty, and property, but it is wrong for the government of the US to force Americans to pay for the liberty of others. The government should only defend those who pay for it.
Of course, the government shouldn't really exist anyway; a private defense company would be sure only to protect those who paid for protection.
AlexanderLee1 1 year ago
why is everyone talking so fast? wtf
feeknocks 1 year ago
@feeknocks I think it's because of their time limits.
AlexanderLee1 1 year ago
Neocons either have to accept a countries sovereignty or not. You can't have it both ways.
You can't recognize iraq as a country, and then decide you have the right to go and invade it and do with it as you wish.
bobdole57 2 years ago
Iraq, Iran or even Germany.
If you recognize it as a sovereign nation, you can't offensively INVADE it.
bobdole57 2 years ago
lol, nice mosquito analogy
and uh, our export of infidelity to the middle east sucks right now bc we have no money, we're spending it all on our overseas military campaign!
so how are we going to win again? we're not exporting our vile culture and we're broke....
ineternitypast 2 years ago