Added: 3 years ago
From: bretrisdotcom
Views: 901
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ROFL

  • amazing!

  • How come you don't got more views? You are awsome guys. You tube are nazis, they fucking nazis LOL. Keep the good work, hope you read comments.

  • Is the "Chad Bond" thing really supposed to be funny to anybody outside of a group of perhaps 20 people?

    I mean, I thought it was funny the first episode, but it really doesn't work

  • Comment removed

  • I want More macgyver the college years :P That it the greatest series I have ever seen On youtube!

  • :( cursing really took away from it, especially since it wouldnt just be out of character, which can make something funny for sure, but it also was excessive andnot something i think most of us would even care to think of the president as doing. I mean, we would have to hate him to want to think that poorly of him.

    Next is the character of Taylor Ann

    Is she trying to be seductive? Doesnt work. Too overdone.

  • It's a parody! You really don't "get" parodies ,do you?

    It was awesome as usual!

  • my point was that the parody was poorly done.

    but i qwont hold it against you for liking it

  • And I'm just saying that ifyou watch Saturday Night Live just once,you will see this is exactly what would be seen on there.Just Watch Saturday Night Live next week or look up anything on youtube from Sat night live.This guy should be working for that show.

  • Holding the modern incacrnation of SNL up as an example of "quality" is a poor choice in any argument.

    I give Bret way more credit than that.

  • I agree.BUT I was just using a well known example of what a parody is.SNL,Madtv,and that one from Canada, all parody shows.Weather they are good or not is irrelevant in my comparison

  • It's completely relevant, considering you called the sketch "awesome" and then identified it as something worthy of SNL.

    You really don't "get" logic, do you?

  • Read what I posted again (scroll up a bit)

    It IS a parody just like you would see on Sat night live(like I posted regardless of which one is bad and which one is good they are both parodies) and this guy's stuff is "awesome" and he should be working for Sat night live or Mad TV.You yourself just said SNL sucks.This guy should be working for them Read between the lines and think.He SHOULD be working for them.If you don't get it this time,I'll spell it out for you next time I'm online.

  • I read the first two lines of your response and gave up. Coherence, let alone basic grammar, is a hallmark of valid opinions.

  • Fine.Just get tired of people who can't read past the written word(but if you stopped after the 1st 2 lines..save that for another time,I guess)Here it is.When my place of business was failing, they hired a new person who could do it better then their current representative.

    This guy should be working for SNL, or now that I think about it,MadTV because when a business is failing, you hire someone who can do different and better things.Why was that hard for u 2 figure out?"He SHOULD work 4 SNL"

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more