Origin of Inertia. Inertial Propulsion a.k.a. Anti-Gravity

[Thorsupremecommander]

I think there is weak point in this theory low/high density of spacetime. the problem is that if it were true then not change of speed but change of position of the body would create interial force. in other words = electron going 200 000 000 m/s would stop after short tme. but observations show that it may go through empty space for very long period of time.

[Dr3adlox]

@Thorsupremecommander I think you din't get it. When an object accelerates it moves relative to the center of the curvature. That slows down the object but at the same time proportionally the object speeds up the curvature itself adding to its kinetic energy. So when the acceleration of the object stops the speed of the object and the speed of the curvature equal out and the interaction between them stops. Its kind of hard to explain you have to imagine it.

[Thorsupremecommander]

@Dr3adlox so now we have to "objects" going with given velocity. one is material body and the other is "space-time curvature wave". ok, let's assume it is true. but now we have another problem. why this space-time has property of inertia and "lags" a little? it opooses changes of velocity not velocity or position itself. so in reality he does not explian anything. he simply moves property of inertia from matter to space frame.

[Dr3adlox]

@Thorsupremecommander As you said its a two object system. Inertia in this model is the resistance in change in velocity  caused by the interaction between the two objects. If you are moving the matter that acts on ST curvature and if you move the ST curvature that acts on the matter. The ST curvature acts no differently than the matter. They are a locked system and any change in one causes a force on the other but that force goes both ways. It both pulls ST forward and pulls back the matter.

[Dr3adlox]

@Thorsupremecommander There is no problem in the change in position alone. If both ST curvature and matter have the same direction and velocity they do not interact. Interaction occurs only when a force acts on one of them but not the other. The energy of that force has to be transferred to the ST curvature so they can equal out. The transfer of this energy from ST to matter or from matter to ST is inertia.

[q7spiz]

Amplifying time space curvature when you are able to cancel out space time curvature with the forces. Going from lower frequency strong forces to higher frequency strong forces with planke's constant. Convert matter to energy and then back again. Rift a perfect balance between phase levels. Cloud ships. I am starting to understand how more UFO's showed up as we got closer and started going into the milky way. Greater photon mass density. Concentrating high frequencies wavelengths 2 B visible.

[rawmo]

that is a very straightforward and completly logical description.

thank you

i love affirmation

[IsLikeThat]

1. Mass curves space-time, but why would this decrease the space density of surrounding space-time below its normal density? One would think that a massive object would press into surrounding space to create an area of higher space density between it & more distant space.

2. If an object has no mass, any force would produce infinite acceleration, which is impossible. More specifically, massless particles must always travel at the speed of light within the familiar three spatial dimensional.

[openureyes911]

1. Mass curves space-time, so when there is no mass present the space-time occupies a smaller volume then if there were no mass.

Like stretching a trampoline when you sit on it, the rubber surface is stretched out so theres less weavings of the rubber fibres that make the trampoline surface so the surface is less dense as it takes up a larger area.

My analogy isnt complete, need 3D, but you can think of rotating the surface and then imagine the mass to inflate the space-time around it.

[openureyes911]

2. I think it just appears to have no mass because you have manipulated the space-time so the mass vectors point out radially and cancel. So it doesnt have to travel at the speed of light.

Someone else could probably explain the last bit abit better.

But maybe cancelling out the mass vector completely we could then achieve light speed?

[Dr3adlox]

I think they can go faster than light because they curve space.

[stevenchiverton]

@openureyes911 to much time spent explaining it useing phisics and earth objects in ya explanations , so get to the piont and biuld it and show us it in flight

[openureyes911]

very well explaind, we need to do some experiments ppl.