The facts in the video are accurate, but words such as "employment," innovation," "investment" broadly frame corporations positively, which isn't true of all corporations. Monsanto and AIG are two obvious examples. It's a great video with implicit generalizations.
I was really hoping this video would've been produced by some sort of independent, non-profit, unbiased organization, but when I saw "Business Roundtable" at the end with the little SM on it, I was like, yup...
a lot of open ended information..."a lot of people -shareholders- invest and prosper"- yeah, sure 'a lot', many, many people i know they can not affors to become a 'honored' ,"distinguished" shareholder. the fact it's that not many people can be in full potential to decide about corporation future/managemant.
this it's just propaganda.- i'm a independent living in California. I was borned in Costa Rica. i'm not republican neither democrat- just independent...this is my opinion.
josemiguel141, it's true that most people can't afford to become an influential shareholder. However, we can buy and sell stock based on our feelings about what a company does or the way it's managed. If enough people feel the same way we do, the company will feel our influence.
Not every company that is publicly traded has a majority of its stock owned by a single person.
Look at HP: Carly Fiorina was opposed by Walter Hewlett, son of one of the founders, to merge with Compaq in 2002. Other large shareholders opposed the merger as well. Still, a slim majority of shareholders approved the merger anyway. Shareholders of HP also sent Fiorina packing when the merger didn't pan out so well.
Cool stuff. When are further installments in this series being released?
noblebearaw 1 year ago
Corporate structure is politically agnostic and they like anything else can be used for good or bad.
We need that structure to power our economy. If one feels animosity toward that model
my suggestion is find a corporation that produces products or services you believe in and invest in them.
No corporations = no internet, no computers, no cars, no central heat and air and the list
goes on. Non profits that make things you like or believe in, can only exist in a world populated by for profits.
CMOORE5511 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
CMOORE5511 2 years ago
Comment removed
CMOORE5511 2 years ago
oh look, another liberal moron
Sivels 2 years ago
Also, I think I should add that I rather enjoyed the balance in perspective which this gives to the media's incessant corporate-bashing.
htmlqawsedrftg 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
The facts in the video are accurate, but words such as "employment," innovation," "investment" broadly frame corporations positively, which isn't true of all corporations. Monsanto and AIG are two obvious examples. It's a great video with implicit generalizations.
I was really hoping this video would've been produced by some sort of independent, non-profit, unbiased organization, but when I saw "Business Roundtable" at the end with the little SM on it, I was like, yup...
htmlqawsedrftg 2 years ago
Comment removed
jonchilou 2 years ago
@ehrahman
Intel is a corporation.
Google is a corporation.
You used their products to write your inane comment.
merkavah4 2 years ago 3
@ehrahman
Indeed, a video about basic corporate structure making absolutely zero political points is "corporate propaganda."
Such ignorance cannot be natural, it must be educated. I mourn for your educators for doing you such a disservice.
DeckKnight 2 years ago 4
a lot of open ended information..."a lot of people -shareholders- invest and prosper"- yeah, sure 'a lot', many, many people i know they can not affors to become a 'honored' ,"distinguished" shareholder. the fact it's that not many people can be in full potential to decide about corporation future/managemant.
this it's just propaganda.- i'm a independent living in California. I was borned in Costa Rica. i'm not republican neither democrat- just independent...this is my opinion.
josemiguel141 2 years ago
josemiguel141, it's true that most people can't afford to become an influential shareholder. However, we can buy and sell stock based on our feelings about what a company does or the way it's managed. If enough people feel the same way we do, the company will feel our influence.
caraclaudel 2 years ago
Not every company that is publicly traded has a majority of its stock owned by a single person.
Look at HP: Carly Fiorina was opposed by Walter Hewlett, son of one of the founders, to merge with Compaq in 2002. Other large shareholders opposed the merger as well. Still, a slim majority of shareholders approved the merger anyway. Shareholders of HP also sent Fiorina packing when the merger didn't pan out so well.
LayZ23 2 years ago 2
Excellent video.
bsgram 2 years ago