Inversion is a better individual player that puts up the numbers every night but Steve Nash is a far better and more complete basketball player. No one has the passing creativity or skill of Steve Nash he made teams brilliant. You look at the phoenix suns a few years ago, they were the best offensive team in the league. Yeah they had amare but no one else could have been the scorer they were without the playmaking of Steve Nash. Allen inversion is one scorer. Steve nash makes everyone on his te
i would take a prime iverson over nash any day. the guy had to take shots, so cut the stats talk, he had to take and CREATE shots without any playmaker on his team, and they didnt even have a good enough rebounder. steve nash had talent of some sort around him 24/7. so cuts the % talk and look at the shit that % cant tell u
AI's ppg is the only stat that was shown that makes him stand out over Nash - 40% 3PT is excellent for both players. AI's 40% FG% makes that stat a lot worse considering the amount of points he misses every game to get to such a high average. Combine that with Nash's advantage in assists and it seems strange to me that you would conclude that AI is slightly better (based on this video).
Personally, I'd pick Nash over AI in a fantasy draft if both would be in their primes.
AI's ppg is the only stat that was shown that makes him stand out over Nash - 40% 3PT is excellent for both players. AI's 40% FG% makes that stat a lot worse considering the amount of points he misses every game to get to such a high average. Combine that with Nash's advantage in assists and it seems strange to me that you would conclude that AI is slightly better (based on this video).
Personally, I'd pick Nash over AI in a fantasy draft if both would be in their primes.
@BobDS06 well, Nash was never considered as defender, while AI was getting a lot of steals, also AI in his prime was quicker than Nash in his prime..But in the end, they play different positions, so it is not right to compare them
@fun4joke I completely agree that it's as pointless a discussion as comparing apples with oranges. But for the sake of argument, I'd pick 10+ assists over 3+ steals in a game, as well as basketball IQ over speed. To me basketball is a team game, and Iverson doesn't really have much going for him looking at his game that way. I'd also prefer an average sized point guard over an highly undersized shooting guard on defense. Personal preferences, though.
@fun4joke Actually they played the same position, or should have. Nash was never a shut down defender, but I have been watching him play for a long time and I think he is very under rated on that side of the ball. How often does he really get lit up? Maybe once or twice a year, out of eighty-two games in a normal season. I can take that.
@StonerHAS That is because AI wouldnt pass the rock. How can you say he was a one man team when he Iguadola and Mt. Mutombo with a handful of other good players that made big plays there and else ware. Everyone down plays those teams, but honestly they could have been something special if AI would have let them play.
@StephenJung1 Secondly, every team/teamate Iverson played with slowly got worse as a result of it. So the guy had two or three decent teams around him that could play defense well enough to cary them deep doesnt make him a great scorer. The guy refused to even parctice, let alone be a teamate. Do you think that Jordan or Kobe ever had a problem showing up to practice on a regular basis? No, the great ones never do.
People are retarded for thinking nash is better..ai a ball hog...he threw up plenty of ally oops and dishes to andre and eric snow in his prime as we'll as crossing up people even mj wake up people!
Not sure where you got those shooting percentages, but Iverson did not shoot that well. Iverson barely out rebounded Nash, and his only convincing STAT was his steals per game.
@cmorty2823 1. Iverson was the main scorer for a long time thus his scoring percentage will not be as high as he would have more pressure to make shots than nash.
2. Turnovers: Had the ball in his hands a lot of the time.
3. Nash should have rebounded more than iverson as he is taller by 3-4 inches
4 Iverson is more of a scorer whereas Nash is more of a passer
@StephenJung1 The fact that Iverson was a scorer is well documented, but gives no excuse for poorer shooting percentages. Drexler, Jordan, Bryant, and James all averaged significantly higher fg% as well as higher 3pt% and fewer turnovers. Nash did not shoot higher percentages because he tooker fewer shots, Nash was a better shooter because he didnt throw up the ball every chance he got. Iverson was nothing more than a team cancer. Nash makes his teamates better, Iverson does not.
@cmorty2823 I don't know how one can even get an MVP by being a team cancer as you suggest. Also, he single-handedly carried his team to the 2001 NBA Finals so he does achieve great things. Steve Nash had great/solid players around him (i.e. Amare) but still cannot achieve the honour of getting into the finals. I am not saying Nash is bad; he is just not as individually skilled as iverson is nor as naturally talented
@StephenJung1 First of all, Iverson was not the only player on that team, he wasnt even the only future Hall of Famer on that team. Mt Mutombo is one of the greatest defensive bigmen in the history of the league. The also had the 6th man of the year that year in Aaron McKey. So to say that Iverson didnt have a team around him is retarded, and if he had passed the ball once in a while they may have one more than just one game that series.
don't disrepect AI like that, haha even though his stats weren't much for show, you can't deny that he was incredibly fun to watch and was a scoring machine.
Liar... Iverson has never ONCE shot over 36% from 3... Nash is only 1 of 2 players to ever shoot 90% + freethrows, 50% + FG, and 40% + Three pointers... Greatest shooter of all time!
a lot of nash fans in this vid.. sorry to burst your bubble but its not even close AI is fucking ridiculous, nash is awesome but prime AI is one of the best to ever play the game. i'm a kobe fan so no bias here, career wise they're pretty close but prime AI would destroy nash sorry
Both play point guard but AI was always going solo, hence the low assists. Steve Nash actually played his position properly, thats why his points and shooting is lower and AI. Thats what I think. IF you disagree feel free to not msg me.
Nash is the best point guard ever aswell as the best player ever, so Nash is better. Also these players are almost exact opposites of each other, kind of a weird comparison.
@tom88cba I have been the biggest Nash supporter on this page. But he is not the best point gaurd of all time nor is he the best player of all time. Those honors would belong to Magic Johnson and Michael Jordan respectively. Sorry
Look at numbers... Nash has the edge on all percentages and is still playing at a totally elite level. He hasn't been run from the NBA, and is absurdly better while handling the ball and running a team. And Iverson was a baller too.
Not Knocking AI, But Nash Is Still In The Top Basketball League In The World. Yes You Guessed It, The NBA. Crossovers And Broken Ankles Are Not Stats And Are Not What Teams Are Looking For.
@Naspolseptem As previously stated he was not alone on that team, and I am sick of people trying to say he broke Jordan's ankles. Seriously! Have you seen the video? I will give AI credit he made a good move and made the shot, but Jordan played good D.
One's a score first point guard and the other is a pass first point guard. Why compare the two when their games are just so, so different.
Hell I'd even make the argument that AI is really a shooting guard or a ball dominating off guard, but whatever. Both are pretty fucking fantastic but personally I love Nash.
@pinoy03sk8ter when someone looks at a good point gaurd , the first thing they would look at is assists not points, allen iverson disregarded his team a lot and if you don't know that , you don't know basketball
@pinoy03sk8ter Thats what a shooting guard is for, AI and Steve nash are point guards, this position is mainly meant for assists, one needs to receieve the ball before scoring, unless you are a ball hog and if someone were to play a zone on you hogging the ball isn't going to put up points for you, moving the ball is. God, learn some common basketball basics...
@benbasketballgtar If you think AI is a ballhog!? How come he brought the Sixers to the Finals.. better then Nash's assists after Western Conference Finals Loses. Maybe he should take his assists back to canada or maybe you should stop sucking his balls
@einadroj01 Shut your uglyass up! AI is better period... He brought the sixers to the finals by himself. Nash got Stoudemire and Nowitzki but he always cry at the end of the playoffs. If I dont know basketball, ask your mom how good i did when she played with my balls.
The only question is, "who you would rather have on your NBA basketball team for a good junk of their career?" Its outlandish that guys can answer AI to that question. There usually thugs or little kids or guys that never played organized basketball where how fly your crossover looks and being a douche is more important than winning. They also are the guys that put up 50 points and 0 passes then lose and say "Did you see that, im the only one doing anything out there! My teammates suck!
AI is just a junkee basketball player. how can you say he is better than nash...if he doesnt know how to pass the ball? a good basketball player is someone who can make his team mates be a good basketball player...like steve nash. steeve nash is the best...the only 1 international player who made it to become an MVP twice.
@srt4alliance yes maybe the two most controversial mvp selections too. how many finals games has nash played in? these questions are far too rhetorical, and the comparison is really unfair on both players because of how different they play. it's like comparing kareem to scottie pippen
@srt4alliance yo the only reason why ai is in turkey, is because of his attitude.. talent doesnt have shxt to do with why ai is over there because, he still is one of the best players in the league.. steve nash got mvp's but no ring.. lets be real he cant do what iverson do.. anyone can pass the damn ball, especially if your iverson.. nash cant score like ai, and would never be better than ai
@Cabalen03 ok neither of them have a ring.. but has nash ever been to the finals??.. if your the best player, u have to be able to lead a team, and thats what ai did.. they didnt win, but they made it, and ai was because the sixers went to the finals.. nash has to do more because for some reason all that passing aint working.. ai has about 77 games where he scored 40 or more points, nash is great to me, but he aint better than ai, and nash needs a scorers on his team at all times to win games
@flybullbam1 OKAY. good argument there but AI only led them once. so what if nash can't lead his team to the finals. just wait, he will. yeah so AI can score 40 points or more. but can he assist 15 or more? can he make his own team look good while he is in the background? NO. which is the very first reason why he lost his job. sure he scored 40ppg when he went to the finals. how about his teammate? nash became MVP cause of his asst, which is hard, yet he did it. twice.
@Cabalen03 thats true.. but u said nash will??. i highly doubt it because he aint getting any younger, and he needs that one star over there, and amare gone, idk wat they can do now .. and btw, when ai was with denver, he dropped 44 points and 15 assists against PHOENIX.. so i cant say he can consistently give u 15 dimes.. but look at that stat.. he does passes, everyone needs a supporting cast, and he had that in denver.. all those points and assists, come on now, u gotta admit, ai is great!!
yeah but this season nash shot 50% from the field, 40% from 3, 90% from the line, while averaging over 10 assists, NASHTY idk whos better not my place to say
stats favor nash, he has 5 more apg than AI, which evens out AI having 10 more ppg, but nash also has a higher assist/turnover rating, but seeing as AI has afew more spg, it evens out, but, nash has 10% more fg%, and this comparison is stupid too, AI mainly plays SG, steve nash plays PG...
Nash is so much more valuable than AI. BBall is a team game and Nash rocks, he makes everyone on his team much better. AI has amazing athletic ability but he takes so many shots the rest of the guys on his team decay offensively. These 2 do the exact opposite things for their teams... Nash is a much more valueable assett to any NBA team. I bet any NBA player/coach woud agree.
Allen iverson is the best scorer, Steve Nash is best at assist. AI got his team to the final by himself, Steve Nash did not come to the finals, but had/have a really good team. So therefore he is the best.
Iverson is a better scorer nd has a better crossover. Nash is a good scorer nd a good passer soo Nash is a better overall pg, but its close. Lets just say A.I would win in a game of 1 on 1
@micahdw3 haha really?? nash has done way more then a.i and is an all aroun better player and leader..skills is one thing but leaderships is another...nash has both while a.i crys about "practice" lol if a.i is so go why did the 76ers the pstons and denver let him go and why is he in turkey??idk u tell me
the only reason ai is betta than nash is kuz of handles wen u cross ova mj u know u got sumtin steve neva crossed any1 on mj's caliber so ai is betta but just by a lil bit
steve nash makes a team better. he gets the system going. A.I will get his 30 ppg (back in the days) but wont make his team better. nash has better vision, creates playes, and is a passer 1st. id take nash any day
em...Ai's 3 point percentage was never .423...it was never even over .40.....i love AI as a player, but i think you are giving him too much credit as a shooter. he's game is based on penetration, and he was never really a spectacular shooter, especially long range.
iverson is a better scorer, nash is a beast in creating plays..both are wonderful players but ai shouldn't be positioned at the 1 spot (pg)..but given his height if u put him in the 2 spot he'll have a hard time creating shots but if plays like his prime before can can match up guys in the 2 spot
you not being fair by making this video, you obviously trying to make Nash look weaker, if u wanna compare Nash, do it with other true guard like Deron or CP3. AI's more of a combo guard, so you should have compared him to someone like kobe or jordon who gave up their assist option due to their scoring abilities, right?
Iverson is younger than Nash... he's an all-star, because most fans are retarded. This is why KG is starting again, Duncan is starting over Dirk, and McGrady almost got in over both Nash and Paul. David Lee deserved to be there, but hey, KG is balling with 14 points and 7 boards a game. Wow... Impressive! I'm shocked the Celtics don't have 5 representatives, and the Lakers don't have 4. Oh yeah, Pau doesn't deserve to be an all-star either. Oh well...
Nash is better, iverson are too selfish and have too big ego. At now, look, Nash is everything for phoenix... AI, is just a scorer, nash can score, and do everything else too.
wow your an idiot if you think pts and all star appearances make a better player. look at the all star team starting lineups atm.. tmac and iverson. now look at how ther playin (or lack of). oh and i think steve nash has 1 more mvp and makes his teammates better. rather than you know, the opposite (pistons and grizzlies anyone?)
Nash is not the king of crossovers. AI is more legendary with his ankle breakers. Although Nash is the the 5th place 3-point shooter in NBA history.
MrPlaya23ish 3 weeks ago
Nash better overall player, better team skills, Iverson sick individual skills, Nash has some individual skills
ThePolarShredder 2 months ago
AI
aDezenT 3 months ago
Inversion is a better individual player that puts up the numbers every night but Steve Nash is a far better and more complete basketball player. No one has the passing creativity or skill of Steve Nash he made teams brilliant. You look at the phoenix suns a few years ago, they were the best offensive team in the league. Yeah they had amare but no one else could have been the scorer they were without the playmaking of Steve Nash. Allen inversion is one scorer. Steve nash makes everyone on his te
iamsteveooo 3 months ago
i would take a prime iverson over nash any day. the guy had to take shots, so cut the stats talk, he had to take and CREATE shots without any playmaker on his team, and they didnt even have a good enough rebounder. steve nash had talent of some sort around him 24/7. so cuts the % talk and look at the shit that % cant tell u
HecticEthnic 4 months ago
thank u they are wrong an remember that ALLEN IVERSON is better
lonnie8911 4 months ago
great video, i loved how literally all the stats are completely wrong!
Corey11Farhan 4 months ago
AI all day, every day
YoYa8d 4 months ago
are you trolling?
xover76 4 months ago
Allen iverson is the best ! shut up fucking bitch
albytheanswer 4 months ago
Ai all day
ssmokey31 4 months ago
TF AI ALL THE WAY!!! haha :D
1nonlynike 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AI's ppg is the only stat that was shown that makes him stand out over Nash - 40% 3PT is excellent for both players. AI's 40% FG% makes that stat a lot worse considering the amount of points he misses every game to get to such a high average. Combine that with Nash's advantage in assists and it seems strange to me that you would conclude that AI is slightly better (based on this video).
Personally, I'd pick Nash over AI in a fantasy draft if both would be in their primes.
BobDS06 5 months ago
AI's ppg is the only stat that was shown that makes him stand out over Nash - 40% 3PT is excellent for both players. AI's 40% FG% makes that stat a lot worse considering the amount of points he misses every game to get to such a high average. Combine that with Nash's advantage in assists and it seems strange to me that you would conclude that AI is slightly better (based on this video).
Personally, I'd pick Nash over AI in a fantasy draft if both would be in their primes.
BobDS06 5 months ago
@BobDS06 well, Nash was never considered as defender, while AI was getting a lot of steals, also AI in his prime was quicker than Nash in his prime..But in the end, they play different positions, so it is not right to compare them
fun4joke 4 months ago
@fun4joke I completely agree that it's as pointless a discussion as comparing apples with oranges. But for the sake of argument, I'd pick 10+ assists over 3+ steals in a game, as well as basketball IQ over speed. To me basketball is a team game, and Iverson doesn't really have much going for him looking at his game that way. I'd also prefer an average sized point guard over an highly undersized shooting guard on defense. Personal preferences, though.
BobDS06 4 months ago
@fun4joke Actually they played the same position, or should have. Nash was never a shut down defender, but I have been watching him play for a long time and I think he is very under rated on that side of the ball. How often does he really get lit up? Maybe once or twice a year, out of eighty-two games in a normal season. I can take that.
cmorty2823 1 month ago
ai
akaflizmo 5 months ago
AI is very underrated. Nash was a better team player because he always had a good team to support him, but AI was usually a one man show on 76ers.
StonerHAS 5 months ago
@StonerHAS That is because AI wouldnt pass the rock. How can you say he was a one man team when he Iguadola and Mt. Mutombo with a handful of other good players that made big plays there and else ware. Everyone down plays those teams, but honestly they could have been something special if AI would have let them play.
cmorty2823 1 month ago
Comment removed
TheShipitholla 5 months ago
Nash 2-time MVP > AI MVP 1 time
TheShipitholla 5 months ago
@TheShipitholla Nash 0-all star game MVP > AI 2-time all star game MVP.
AI rookie of the year....Nash never rookie of the year. AI least AI has been to the finas unlike Nash.
MrPlaya23ish 1 month ago
Iverson. who crossed more people and everything, he can dunk. Nash just makes 3's and assisted
MrPlaya23ish 5 months ago
@MrPlaya23ish This is possibly the worst arguement for why one player is better than another.
cmorty2823 1 month ago
nash all day
THEDRUMMERBOY711 5 months ago
@StephenJung1 Secondly, every team/teamate Iverson played with slowly got worse as a result of it. So the guy had two or three decent teams around him that could play defense well enough to cary them deep doesnt make him a great scorer. The guy refused to even parctice, let alone be a teamate. Do you think that Jordan or Kobe ever had a problem showing up to practice on a regular basis? No, the great ones never do.
cmorty2823 5 months ago
Whats the title of the song??
Ashhhhhization 5 months ago
AI WAS more of a scorer and Steve Nash IS more of a passer..
RyanakinNewVegas 6 months ago
With so many faulty stats and poor analysis, just erase this video.
spee10 6 months ago
People are retarded for thinking nash is better..ai a ball hog...he threw up plenty of ally oops and dishes to andre and eric snow in his prime as we'll as crossing up people even mj wake up people!
Tigon9000 6 months ago
Not sure where you got those shooting percentages, but Iverson did not shoot that well. Iverson barely out rebounded Nash, and his only convincing STAT was his steals per game.
Iverson: 3pt% .313, FG% .425, and FT% .780
Nash: 3pt% .429, FG% .489, and FT% .904
Iverson: APG 6.2, TOPG 3.6
Nash: APG 8.5, TOPG 2.8
Point blank Iverson sucks!
cmorty2823 6 months ago
@cmorty2823 1. Iverson was the main scorer for a long time thus his scoring percentage will not be as high as he would have more pressure to make shots than nash.
2. Turnovers: Had the ball in his hands a lot of the time.
3. Nash should have rebounded more than iverson as he is taller by 3-4 inches
4 Iverson is more of a scorer whereas Nash is more of a passer
StephenJung1 5 months ago
@StephenJung1 The fact that Iverson was a scorer is well documented, but gives no excuse for poorer shooting percentages. Drexler, Jordan, Bryant, and James all averaged significantly higher fg% as well as higher 3pt% and fewer turnovers. Nash did not shoot higher percentages because he tooker fewer shots, Nash was a better shooter because he didnt throw up the ball every chance he got. Iverson was nothing more than a team cancer. Nash makes his teamates better, Iverson does not.
cmorty2823 5 months ago
@cmorty2823 I don't know how one can even get an MVP by being a team cancer as you suggest. Also, he single-handedly carried his team to the 2001 NBA Finals so he does achieve great things. Steve Nash had great/solid players around him (i.e. Amare) but still cannot achieve the honour of getting into the finals. I am not saying Nash is bad; he is just not as individually skilled as iverson is nor as naturally talented
StephenJung1 5 months ago
@StephenJung1 First of all, Iverson was not the only player on that team, he wasnt even the only future Hall of Famer on that team. Mt Mutombo is one of the greatest defensive bigmen in the history of the league. The also had the 6th man of the year that year in Aaron McKey. So to say that Iverson didnt have a team around him is retarded, and if he had passed the ball once in a while they may have one more than just one game that series.
cmorty2823 5 months ago
@cmorty2823 FUCK YOU. NASH AND IVERSON ARE 2 OF MY FAVOURITE PLAYERS BUT IVERSON DOES NOT SUCK. 3RD HIGHEST SCORING AVERAGE IN NBA HISTORY.
MrNBaFaNfOrEvEr 4 months ago
@cmorty2823 OK STEVE NASH IS GOOD MAN. BUT WHY WOULD YOU SAY IVERSON SUCKS. HES PROBABLY TOP 60 OF ALL TIME. COME ON STOP HATING MAN! YOU SUCK!
flipzz101 2 months ago
@cmorty2823
don't disrepect AI like that, haha even though his stats weren't much for show, you can't deny that he was incredibly fun to watch and was a scoring machine.
NotLmfao 2 months ago
@cmorty2823 If you doubt my STATS look it up yourself. Those are the legit numbers.
cmorty2823 1 month ago
Allen Iverson free thow % is 79; Allen Iverson three point % is 31.
Kintou66 6 months ago
steve nash's teams win because of assists and smart fg %
ai scores all the points and jacks up garbage shots
greenhornet585 6 months ago
Liar... Iverson has never ONCE shot over 36% from 3... Nash is only 1 of 2 players to ever shoot 90% + freethrows, 50% + FG, and 40% + Three pointers... Greatest shooter of all time!
44MiNiMe44 7 months ago 5
@44MiNiMe44 right i thought that was wrong
hlhome 6 months ago
@hlhome He was wrong, Nash is the only one to ever do it. Unless I am mistaken.
cmorty2823 1 month ago
in an one on one AI is beating Nash at any moment but Nash is the better team player...but both are amazing players.
And by the way, the free throw percentage is the last thing you should care about, when you talk about those guys!
Agen7Smith 8 months ago
nash!!
MrManuel7474 8 months ago
a lot of nash fans in this vid.. sorry to burst your bubble but its not even close AI is fucking ridiculous, nash is awesome but prime AI is one of the best to ever play the game. i'm a kobe fan so no bias here, career wise they're pretty close but prime AI would destroy nash sorry
fannypack311 8 months ago
Comment removed
fannypack311 8 months ago
Both play point guard but AI was always going solo, hence the low assists. Steve Nash actually played his position properly, thats why his points and shooting is lower and AI. Thats what I think. IF you disagree feel free to not msg me.
FISHURMOMBALL 8 months ago
@FISHURMOMBALL actually for about 7-8 years AI was playing at shooting guard position
TheMetallica1924 8 months ago
@TheMetallica1924 Ah see. That explains it.
FISHURMOMBALL 8 months ago
@FISHURMOMBALL AI played sg most his career
Zangetsu1435 6 months ago
he cant dunk
coburnkaiya4 8 months ago
Iverson made $154 000 000 from the NBA. Nash has made 63 000 000
tristancutler 9 months ago
@tristancutler so ???
nixdaduda11 8 months ago
@tristancutler Probably more than you or me will ever earn.
FISHURMOMBALL 8 months ago
Nash is better but during AI's prime i would say he was better but throughout career Nash just dominates
JokersFollower 9 months ago
THre both good, Its just tht AI is a hall of famer ;)
11ime 9 months ago
@11ime And Nash isn't?
henrimart7 8 months ago
lol thier both going to be in the hall of fame wtf
hlhome 8 months ago
AI is better at dribbling and breaking ankles, Nash is a sick playmaker, passer, and a shooter
buddhistgangstamonk 9 months ago
Nash has nothing on Iverson
OmarChannel 10 months ago
Nash is the best point guard ever aswell as the best player ever, so Nash is better. Also these players are almost exact opposites of each other, kind of a weird comparison.
tom88cba 10 months ago
@tom88cba I have been the biggest Nash supporter on this page. But he is not the best point gaurd of all time nor is he the best player of all time. Those honors would belong to Magic Johnson and Michael Jordan respectively. Sorry
cmorty2823 1 month ago
nash is the one that is still in the NBA...
gozzer13 10 months ago 38
@gozzer13 Exactly!!!! Which is funny too since Iverson is younger than Nash too!
Koreyrad 9 months ago
@Koreyrad iverson left because of family issues
AznStylezBeatbox 8 months ago
@AznStylezBeatbox No Iverson left because no one wanted him. He went to Europe and rode the bench.
cmorty2823 1 month ago
@gozzer13 yeah but iverson got injured a lot more than nash.
StephenJung1 5 months ago
nASH IS BETTER
esTebanLRD 10 months ago
Look at numbers... Nash has the edge on all percentages and is still playing at a totally elite level. He hasn't been run from the NBA, and is absurdly better while handling the ball and running a team. And Iverson was a baller too.
TexasPsychoK 10 months ago
Not Knocking AI, But Nash Is Still In The Top Basketball League In The World. Yes You Guessed It, The NBA. Crossovers And Broken Ankles Are Not Stats And Are Not What Teams Are Looking For.
87Stasha 11 months ago
AI all the way, man, he got the sixers to the finals all alone, best crossover ever, even broke mj's ankles, what else do u need?
Naspolseptem 11 months ago
@Naspolseptem what do u mean ALL ALONE huh !! ??
razorclaws13 10 months ago
@Naspolseptem As previously stated he was not alone on that team, and I am sick of people trying to say he broke Jordan's ankles. Seriously! Have you seen the video? I will give AI credit he made a good move and made the shot, but Jordan played good D.
cmorty2823 1 month ago
AI is a scorer, Nash is a passer
forselanne8 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IS STEVE NASH THE GREATEST POINT GUARD OF THE 2000'S? CHECK OUT THE TOP TEN SHOW, TODAY AT 10:00 A.M. (EST.) ON ISRAELSPORTSRADIODOTCOM.
IsraelSportsRadio 1 year ago
Nash shoots less, more efficient, passes more, makes everyone around him better.
retardno002 1 year ago
ALLEN IVERSON NEVER MADE HIS TEAM BETTER. THATS WHAT NASH DID.
mully604 1 year ago
nash wons iverson..iverson is a ball hog and gets 20 a game..nash isnt a ball hog gets 10 assists and 20 a game what aboss
007gamingclan 1 year ago
nash is better, true PG
CCWAVES 1 year ago
One's a score first point guard and the other is a pass first point guard. Why compare the two when their games are just so, so different.
Hell I'd even make the argument that AI is really a shooting guard or a ball dominating off guard, but whatever. Both are pretty fucking fantastic but personally I love Nash.
y3l10w 1 year ago
A.I. is the best PG that ever done it. A.I way better than nash..
Nash --> 14.9 ppg
A.I. --> 26.7 ppg
Nash better?? I dont think so... AI is the best!!
pinoy03sk8ter 1 year ago
@pinoy03sk8ter when someone looks at a good point gaurd , the first thing they would look at is assists not points, allen iverson disregarded his team a lot and if you don't know that , you don't know basketball
benbasketballgtar 1 year ago
@benbasketballgtar I don't give a fuck! assist don't win games. POINTS DO
pinoy03sk8ter 1 year ago
@pinoy03sk8ter Thats what a shooting guard is for, AI and Steve nash are point guards, this position is mainly meant for assists, one needs to receieve the ball before scoring, unless you are a ball hog and if someone were to play a zone on you hogging the ball isn't going to put up points for you, moving the ball is. God, learn some common basketball basics...
benbasketballgtar 1 year ago
@benbasketballgtar If you think AI is a ballhog!? How come he brought the Sixers to the Finals.. better then Nash's assists after Western Conference Finals Loses. Maybe he should take his assists back to canada or maybe you should stop sucking his balls
pinoy03sk8ter 1 year ago
@pinoy03sk8ter bobo di marunong ulol. In short you don't know basketball at all.
einadroj01 1 year ago
@einadroj01 Shut your uglyass up! AI is better period... He brought the sixers to the finals by himself. Nash got Stoudemire and Nowitzki but he always cry at the end of the playoffs. If I dont know basketball, ask your mom how good i did when she played with my balls.
pinoy03sk8ter 1 year ago
not even close.. nash is the best by so much
maginick24 1 year ago
The only question is, "who you would rather have on your NBA basketball team for a good junk of their career?" Its outlandish that guys can answer AI to that question. There usually thugs or little kids or guys that never played organized basketball where how fly your crossover looks and being a douche is more important than winning. They also are the guys that put up 50 points and 0 passes then lose and say "Did you see that, im the only one doing anything out there! My teammates suck!
tnus3 1 year ago
@tnus3 Well said, well said.
cmorty2823 1 month ago
AI is done/finished. He'll do well in Turkey against non-NBA caliber players.
reno93535 1 year ago
@reno93535 Actually he didnt do well there.
cmorty2823 1 month ago
Steve Nash MVP twice
Allen Iverson once
vipdotcom 1 year ago
AI is just a junkee basketball player. how can you say he is better than nash...if he doesnt know how to pass the ball? a good basketball player is someone who can make his team mates be a good basketball player...like steve nash. steeve nash is the best...the only 1 international player who made it to become an MVP twice.
pinkmocha16 1 year ago
Okay Guys Nash Plays Good In Team not 1v1 Guys He can't dunk Advantage ast Iverson Does Crossover Advantage drippling.
emonisan 1 year ago
@emonisan if u dunk it doesn't mean your the best
darefresh12 1 year ago
k AI is a much better individual player overall but stevbe nash is a better team player
addy800 1 year ago
Allen Iverson is WAY funner to watch.
AllenIversonFan4Life 1 year ago
Steve Nash is a PG and AI is a SG.
xxxheat 1 year ago
i think nash is better because he shares the ball to his teammates but iverson hogs it
bhentehquatroh1 1 year ago
steve nash is still in the nba but AI isnt
phxsuns13 1 year ago
ai wayyy better than steve nash, and if u wanna debate with me.. bring it on niggas!!
flybullbam1 1 year ago
@flybullbam1 and thats why Ai is where??? i dont even know... debate with Nash two time MVP son!!!!
srt4alliance 1 year ago
@srt4alliance yes maybe the two most controversial mvp selections too. how many finals games has nash played in? these questions are far too rhetorical, and the comparison is really unfair on both players because of how different they play. it's like comparing kareem to scottie pippen
mdamian1984 1 year ago
@srt4alliance yo the only reason why ai is in turkey, is because of his attitude.. talent doesnt have shxt to do with why ai is over there because, he still is one of the best players in the league.. steve nash got mvp's but no ring.. lets be real he cant do what iverson do.. anyone can pass the damn ball, especially if your iverson.. nash cant score like ai, and would never be better than ai
flybullbam1 1 year ago
The only reason why steve nash don't score like AI is because he passes the ball.
look at the formula. steve nash 17 ppg 11 apg. AI 28ppg 6 apg.
if steve dont have those 5 assists. he will have another 10 points minimum, some may be treys. and look at that efficiency! 50%!
they are good in their own right, but don't ever say that nash won't be better than AI. HE ALREADY IS.
BTW, AI doesn't have any ring also.
Cabalen03 1 year ago
@Cabalen03 ok neither of them have a ring.. but has nash ever been to the finals??.. if your the best player, u have to be able to lead a team, and thats what ai did.. they didnt win, but they made it, and ai was because the sixers went to the finals.. nash has to do more because for some reason all that passing aint working.. ai has about 77 games where he scored 40 or more points, nash is great to me, but he aint better than ai, and nash needs a scorers on his team at all times to win games
flybullbam1 1 year ago
Comment removed
Cabalen03 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@flybullbam1 OKAY. good argument there but AI only led them once. so what if nash can't lead his team to the finals. just wait, he will. yeah so AI can score 40 points or more. but can he assist 15 or more? can he make his own team look good while he is in the background? NO. which is the very first reason why he lost his job. sure he scored 40ppg when he went to the finals. how about his teammate? nash became MVP cause of his asst, which is hard, yet he did it. twice.
Cabalen03 1 year ago
@Cabalen03 thats true.. but u said nash will??. i highly doubt it because he aint getting any younger, and he needs that one star over there, and amare gone, idk wat they can do now .. and btw, when ai was with denver, he dropped 44 points and 15 assists against PHOENIX.. so i cant say he can consistently give u 15 dimes.. but look at that stat.. he does passes, everyone needs a supporting cast, and he had that in denver.. all those points and assists, come on now, u gotta admit, ai is great!!
flybullbam1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@flybullbam1 The only reason why steve nash don't score like AI is because he passes the ball.
look at the formula. steve nash 17 ppg 11 apg. AI 28ppg 6 apg.
if steve dont have those 5 assists. he will have another 10 points minimum, some may be treys. and look at that efficiency! 50%!
they are good in their own right, but don't ever say that nash won't be better than AI. HE ALREADY IS.
BTW, AI doesn't have any ring also.
Cabalen03 1 year ago
AI plays in Turkey. Nash wins
mcknightluke 1 year ago 10
yeah but this season nash shot 50% from the field, 40% from 3, 90% from the line, while averaging over 10 assists, NASHTY idk whos better not my place to say
worldennds2012 1 year ago
ai's also a hog and poor team chemistry where's a stat for that.
buddhamonk911 1 year ago
stats favor nash, he has 5 more apg than AI, which evens out AI having 10 more ppg, but nash also has a higher assist/turnover rating, but seeing as AI has afew more spg, it evens out, but, nash has 10% more fg%, and this comparison is stupid too, AI mainly plays SG, steve nash plays PG...
Gabbesp1995 1 year ago
nash still in the NBA ......AI might be playing for china....enough said! NASH FTW
acuradan623 1 year ago 2
Nash is so much more valuable than AI. BBall is a team game and Nash rocks, he makes everyone on his team much better. AI has amazing athletic ability but he takes so many shots the rest of the guys on his team decay offensively. These 2 do the exact opposite things for their teams... Nash is a much more valueable assett to any NBA team. I bet any NBA player/coach woud agree.
KennedyCorey 1 year ago
two totally different styled guards
akim2034 1 year ago
As a "phoenix's point guard" Nash is better ,but as a "scorer or philadelphia and denvers' shooting guard nobody can be better than A.I
killcrossover 1 year ago
You can't tell who's better by their stats or their rings.
But I love A.I. and hes the best
edwarlkd814 1 year ago
Allen iverson is the best scorer, Steve Nash is best at assist. AI got his team to the final by himself, Steve Nash did not come to the finals, but had/have a really good team. So therefore he is the best.
9mrjacob 1 year ago
nash is better!!
ceniraul 1 year ago
Iverson is a better scorer nd has a better crossover. Nash is a good scorer nd a good passer soo Nash is a better overall pg, but its close. Lets just say A.I would win in a game of 1 on 1
k3venc 1 year ago
you're a retard for thinking iverson is better
tehasian1 1 year ago 2
IMO steve nash is de best pg in de league, but AI is still a gd pg nonetheless...
WhisperInDeWind 1 year ago
Comment removed
WhisperInDeWind 1 year ago
Ai then.
Nash now.
RythymAndRhyme 1 year ago
Allen Iverson- has one of best crossovers ever
kyleseanpk1 1 year ago
nash 2 MVPs. AI 1 MVP.
nash is still in the league, nobody wants AI, hows that for facts
lookatamonkey 1 year ago
Iverson is way better than Nash this shouldnt even be on youtube.
micahdw3 1 year ago
@micahdw3 haha really?? nash has done way more then a.i and is an all aroun better player and leader..skills is one thing but leaderships is another...nash has both while a.i crys about "practice" lol if a.i is so go why did the 76ers the pstons and denver let him go and why is he in turkey??idk u tell me
l7squad 1 year ago
..iverson is blessed with superior physical abilities..but nash trump him with old fashion work ethic and perseverance..
..iverson may always be in the highlights..but nash masterminds them..
fonsecajunior1 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
THATS BULL SHIT!!!!
flowhite13 1 year ago
bull shit thats y his sorry ass retired nash best point gaurd ever
akaiiii1 1 year ago 2
hell no nash is way better! not even close!
caceres512 1 year ago
youe dumb for thinking ai is better then steve nash!!! hahahah
damexican23 1 year ago 2
if nash wasnt white he would never have gotten mvp
princeofvancouver 1 year ago
@princeofvancouver lmao thats like saying bird was good cuz hes white haha race has NOTHING to do with skills
l7squad 1 year ago
combine AI and nash and you will have a beast pointguard
WhereTheCheeseAt 1 year ago
Nash is so much better than AI!!!!
alesssia13 1 year ago
If you can answer this question, you have your answer. Does defense matter?
dablakoutking 1 year ago
Nash
freshdtb 1 year ago
Very different types of game... I like Nash better , but AI is sick too so ...
rc152009 1 year ago
the only reason ai is betta than nash is kuz of handles wen u cross ova mj u know u got sumtin steve neva crossed any1 on mj's caliber so ai is betta but just by a lil bit
lazydemon74 1 year ago
@lazydemon74 how the hell can you say that allen iverson handles the ball better than steve?
LittleLead 1 year ago
NASH all the way !!
301807137 1 year ago
steve nash makes a team better. he gets the system going. A.I will get his 30 ppg (back in the days) but wont make his team better. nash has better vision, creates playes, and is a passer 1st. id take nash any day
Brynny211 1 year ago 2
em...Ai's 3 point percentage was never .423...it was never even over .40.....i love AI as a player, but i think you are giving him too much credit as a shooter. he's game is based on penetration, and he was never really a spectacular shooter, especially long range.
qwe340 1 year ago
Iverson was better but now he's away whithout say good bye
23DannyFresh 1 year ago
iverson took more shots than nash also
tigerman567 1 year ago
iverson is a better scorer, nash is a beast in creating plays..both are wonderful players but ai shouldn't be positioned at the 1 spot (pg)..but given his height if u put him in the 2 spot he'll have a hard time creating shots but if plays like his prime before can can match up guys in the 2 spot
027ricky 1 year ago
yeah ai is better!!
The3pliCait 1 year ago
Nash is better!!!
hiroka89 1 year ago
are you high? nash is waaaay better
anglelock30 1 year ago 3
Everyone knows that Steve Nash is a way better player than Allen Iverson
BSSMA2 1 year ago 3
GO NASH!!!!!!
LjubaGiuliani 2 years ago 11
ehats the song?
phatwallet5 2 years ago
you not being fair by making this video, you obviously trying to make Nash look weaker, if u wanna compare Nash, do it with other true guard like Deron or CP3. AI's more of a combo guard, so you should have compared him to someone like kobe or jordon who gave up their assist option due to their scoring abilities, right?
thestfuguy 2 years ago 2
Nash has 2 MVPs, AI has 1.
both point guards, except one doesnt know his position...guess who. lol
lookatamonkey 2 years ago 12
theyre both good, nash stats are better considering the suns drafted steve just to sit him on the bench and get jason kidd in 96
ENAIZHA 2 years ago
Iverson is younger than Nash... he's an all-star, because most fans are retarded. This is why KG is starting again, Duncan is starting over Dirk, and McGrady almost got in over both Nash and Paul. David Lee deserved to be there, but hey, KG is balling with 14 points and 7 boards a game. Wow... Impressive! I'm shocked the Celtics don't have 5 representatives, and the Lakers don't have 4. Oh yeah, Pau doesn't deserve to be an all-star either. Oh well...
TexasPsychoK 2 years ago
NASH !
RHCP10001 2 years ago 3
Nash is better, iverson are too selfish and have too big ego. At now, look, Nash is everything for phoenix... AI, is just a scorer, nash can score, and do everything else too.
BecomeB 2 years ago 3
GO IVERSON!!!!!!!!
JonnyRaptors 2 years ago
wow your an idiot if you think pts and all star appearances make a better player. look at the all star team starting lineups atm.. tmac and iverson. now look at how ther playin (or lack of). oh and i think steve nash has 1 more mvp and makes his teammates better. rather than you know, the opposite (pistons and grizzlies anyone?)
dallasmvrk13 2 years ago 3
Steve Nash could take iverson on anyday of the week
Bradyvideos18 2 years ago 2
Steve is best player in the world
sefridante 2 years ago 3
AI FTW!
dmcdantedx 2 years ago