Every support column has to has to fail at exactly the same moment to have a symmetric collapse, otherwise the building will fall apart as it burns. I doubt any buildings ever fell like WTC7 before controlled demolitions were invented. Computer timing of explosives is absolutely critical to drop in it's own footprint.
I know the conclusions that NIST came to, There must have been some big bribes going on there because any 10th grade science student would say "What?" I'm talking about in this simulation. the beams and pannels would be behind the walls and ceilings that are there before they light the fire. Ceilings and wall pannels are just as much fuel for an office fire as computers and desks are, depending what they're made out of ofcourse.
Even NIST own excercise shows that a office fire even with an accelerant used could not cause a universal simalanious collapse of a structure. That was not a hot fire. The fire consumed its fuel quickly and than pertered out. All that is needed is 1 hose and 2 firefighters to put that fire out. Geeze even the thermal layer did not get that low. It would have been interesting if they had connected a thermal camera to the video so we could see the temp.
@patthespark Notice this fire went out long before it got hot enough to melt anything but plastic and wood.
IranContraScumDid911 5 months ago
Every support column has to has to fail at exactly the same moment to have a symmetric collapse, otherwise the building will fall apart as it burns. I doubt any buildings ever fell like WTC7 before controlled demolitions were invented. Computer timing of explosives is absolutely critical to drop in it's own footprint.
buttkracken 5 months ago
What about the pancake collapse?? Where's the collapse in this experiment?
moogman5 8 months ago
I know the conclusions that NIST came to, There must have been some big bribes going on there because any 10th grade science student would say "What?" I'm talking about in this simulation. the beams and pannels would be behind the walls and ceilings that are there before they light the fire. Ceilings and wall pannels are just as much fuel for an office fire as computers and desks are, depending what they're made out of ofcourse.
purplehatcult 9 months ago
Even NIST own excercise shows that a office fire even with an accelerant used could not cause a universal simalanious collapse of a structure. That was not a hot fire. The fire consumed its fuel quickly and than pertered out. All that is needed is 1 hose and 2 firefighters to put that fire out. Geeze even the thermal layer did not get that low. It would have been interesting if they had connected a thermal camera to the video so we could see the temp.
Emsworker68 1 year ago
@Emsworker68 Whatever the max temp achieved it certainly didn't sustain it long. Am I wrong in seeing a visible decline after about 10 minutes?
Ahlywog 11 months ago
haha what are those lame poles holding up the ceiling??
BronyaCovooper 1 year ago
Wow, these things aren't even mocks of the towers!!!
They made the perimeter, but where is the supposed weak spot (the floor trusses)???
All I saw was some beams holding up the ceiling panels!!!
ctrackmonger 1 year ago
@ctrackmonger The supposed weakspots are probably behind the walls and in the ceiling.
purplehatcult 9 months ago
@purplehatcult
The supposed weak spot, according to NIST NCSTAR WTC Catastrophe, was the floor trusses...
There is no ceiling panels, so why do I not see the 45 inches of deflection (bowing) that NIST claimed happened to the trusses???
ctrackmonger 9 months ago
nice
ICEMAN3rdID 1 year ago