What about the other entitlement programs? Stop using old people to base your shitty argument its pathetic. No paper drivers licenses for illegals and people mother sucking off disability and welfare for decades isn't entitlement programs right? Thats just the tip of the ice berg and you know what its crashing down upon you idiotic mother sucking useless fucks. When the checks stop coming people will see your true colors. Unless you a government employee your not getting you beloved check.
At the last of the video he sounded like an extortioner "take nine out of every ten dollars from the nasty rich, because where are they going to go" because someone has no recourse is not an argument to extract money from them. You'll have to do better then that...I say respectful
I question this videos accuracy... I will roughly pay $120120 into SS in 35 years of work and if I live to 78 national average..(less then my mom or dad) and start collecting at 66 I will receive $460,680 that's one problem for starters. Two the rich are not the enemy but a scape goat for the most part, no one was complaining when the rich were leading the way for the little guy's 401k to grow as in the 90s. The answer is the close loop holes in taxes (not raise, it will only filter to the work
Dude obviously you've got victimization issues. Have you been victimized? Probably. And good job on calling disabled vets worthless non-contributors. We are all born equal, what we do with the life god has given us determines who we are, even if it's to die gracefully with cancer. We all have things in life we must overcome. Some are tested more than others. We will be rewarded for our perseverance in this life or the next. Its not up to "government" to bare our burdens.
If a company sells toxic goods the free market would get rid of it by consumer choice, aka voting with dollars, and lets not forget the legal system. Also what company denies access based on race? This isn't the 60's. Also not all jobs are "skilled" jobs and do not require the same pay as a trained professional. As a "minority" who started at the bottom and worked hard to advanced I have realized the fruits of hard work and determination, I don't need " The Man's" crutch.
@ZO5150 Yeah, except that some toxins take years to have an effect, so how the hell are consumers going to know which product caused their health problems? That's why we have regulations, retard. Second, there are plenty of racists who would flock to any business that denies blacks. There are over 2,000 racial hate groups in the U.S. Third, congrats on working, give yourself a cookie. Now go tell a double amputee vet or bankrupt cancer patient that they wouldn't be poor if they just work harder.
@ZO5150 We have the highest corporate taxes in the world. You are entitled to nothing but what you earn. You cannot raise taxes in a recession you ignorant fuck google herbert hoover. It was a disaster. If i ever get rich i wont apoligize for it, neither would you if ur shitty lib videos ever got big an were not laughed at. go learn some shit, better yet, watch the repubs fix shit when obamas gone in 2012. you ignorant fuck
At least this clip got something right. Garbage like this usually does come from some loser coffee dude or first year college student who idolizes ex hippie radical professor. Give me a break. Liberals are more totalitarian than any conservative. If personal freedom and liberty mean anything you lefty pricks would be Libertarians.
@ZO5150 The "freedom" of a corporation to dump toxic waste in our groundwater or sell us products that will give us cancer 30 years later so we have no idea what caused it is not a "personal freedom." The "freedom" of a business to deny people access based on race is not a "personal freedom." The "freedom" of a corporation to pay it's people wages equivalent to those in China (where manufacturing plants install nets outside to prevent suicide jumps), is not a "personal freedom."
@whatisahumans You are an idiot. Since when is it morally right to force anyone into a program that pays for someone elses safety net. I should have a choice as to whether I want to put my money into an entitlement program. Not only that the money that is collected through taxes is not enough to sustain the number of people using the entitlement programs and was never meant to. The programs were intended to help the few that needed not all these people that are on it. Get your fact straight.
@squidwurrd While I do agree that programs like public healthcare and welfare need to be reviewed in order to find waste and fraud, a total shutdown of these programs would inevitably lead to chaos and human misery.
@juantrippe82 yea it would be pretty stupid if you cut everything all at one time. But just like people got on the program people can get off the program at the same pace. We much better off before these programs came around and no one was on the streets dying like they are today. These programs only hurt they do not help it's a nice sound bite for those that dont understand economics but in practice it has failed horribly. It's about fixing it's about getting rid of it.
@whatisahumans DON'T BUY PRODUCTS THEN IF YOU'RE CONCERNED ABOUT THEM BEING TOXIC. YOU HAVE NO ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE PRODUCTS. MANUFACTURERS HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO MAKE SAFE PRODUCTS.
@whatisahumans You might want to rethink that. Why would a company want to sell toxic products? Would they really sacrifice their reputation solely to make a quick buck? They're greedy, as anyone else. You, me, them, we're all greedy. Self-interest runs the world. To say otherwise is ignorant.
Now, if it's in their best interest to continue to get people to buy their products, why on earth would they make faulty products? That's all the incentive they need. You don't need regulation for it.
@juantrippe82 What is a company going to gain from selling you toxic products? If you're dissatisfied, they lose a customer. If they do that a lot, they lose their reputation. Then they go out of business. Why would they EVER want to do that?
the money should all just be spread around almost equally if we ever wish to have a good economy. But that is just about impossible with all the rich fucking millionaires that want to become billionaires. fucking snobbish.
So if you have and A in Liberalism 101 and i have a F your going to give me your points so we both have a C? Why would either of us put any effort into the class then? We wouldnt, and we would both be failing. Have you ever gotten a job from a poor man?
@podman27 Thats not what im saying at all.... im simply stating the fact that there are people in this world that have wayyy to much money and why do they have all the money? BC they own gas companies monopolies ect. they raise the rates on goods and gas or whatever it is they own that they sell just to make more money which is pointless bc they already have enough money to give everybody in africa 500$ lol. Im just saying if things were cheaper, wed all have a lot more money.
Your adressing two subjects, monoplies, and exesive amounts of money. The solution for one is not the solution for the other. Since you started with money, im ignoring the monopolies.
If every 4.0+ student just gave away his points, we would all have a lot higher gpa... right? No. Nobody would have an insentive to succed and thus everyone declines. Rather than stealing their money, how about we give them reasons to spend/invest it?
@podman27 But you are sayin the same thing you said before. That has nothing to do with what im talkin about.. im not a communist or anything, im just stating the fact that people have to much money. And the people with all that money control other peoples money... like the "little guy". And REAGANOMICS really doesnt come into play with that. You clearly dont understand what im saying.
You said that the money should be spread around almost equaly and that would fix the economy. Equal wealth fits the grades analogy perfectly, the key to fixing the economy really lies in unchaining the engine of the economy wich is what REGONOMICS does. You cant expect people to try to succeed when you prohibit success by trying to equalize it. This isnt pre-school anymore, not everybody gets a shinny medal. In fact, doing so hurts the little guy more than helping!
Degrading the conversation to such an irrelevant stance is meaningless.
Since you know so much about it, please enlighten us on the benifits of enablement and entitlement mentality. Educate us on how much penalizing those who drive the economy helps everyone. Tell us all about the problems that come with people succeding. As i said before, entitlements are most harmfull to those who use them.
@podman27 More hyperbole from the Paul/Ayn Rand cultists who since 1980 have enjoyed the highest levels of income while shifting the responsibility of maintaining a decent society to the middle class. I believe libertarianism works best when there is no middle class. That’s what the Austrian/Chicago school economists have conditioned us into thinking we need an obedient working class in order to build a ‘free’ society while dangling the carrot of ‘prosperity’ in front of it.
Don't get me wrong. I love these these political animations. They're hilarious. Can I just ask, though. Do you seriously hold these positions? For example, do you believe that it's bad for people to "save the shit out of money?" Anyway... funny stuff.
@unfpetition Saving money isn't a bad idea, especially for people in the lower in middle class who need to save up for emergencies or for retirement. However, saving becomes a problem when individuals are making billions of dollars and letting almost all of it sit in banks to collect interest. It causes serious economic stagnation. If you are trying to kickstart the economy, it is important to give money to people who will spend it, rather than save it.
@whatisahumans But you do know how savings collect interest, right? Those savings sitting in banks are investments. Businesses and consumers both borrow that money from the bank to purchase items, usually capital goods like machinery, houses, cars, and such. Money that is saved in banks doesn't just "sit in banks". Otherwise, it would not be collecting interest. The banks would be just hoarding the cash in their vaults, which they don't normally do because the banks would then fail.
@unfpetition The problem is that thanks to the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, most deposit money is invested in wall street gambling schemes, toxic assets, and derivatives trading. And not all of the money deposited in banks is invested, some is kept for withdrawal. Giving aid to the lower and middle class creates a new market for goods and services, creating jobs.
@whatisahumans I think you hit the nail on the head with the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act. In fact, the reason we had to have that it place was due to the government getting involved in the private banking sector with things like the FDIC. Then, of course, the banks do whatever they want with the money because they know they'll just get bailed out anyway. I think we may agree on this, but we need to get the government mainly out of the private sector.
What about the other entitlement programs? Stop using old people to base your shitty argument its pathetic. No paper drivers licenses for illegals and people mother sucking off disability and welfare for decades isn't entitlement programs right? Thats just the tip of the ice berg and you know what its crashing down upon you idiotic mother sucking useless fucks. When the checks stop coming people will see your true colors. Unless you a government employee your not getting you beloved check.
drainocleanser 6 months ago
At the last of the video he sounded like an extortioner "take nine out of every ten dollars from the nasty rich, because where are they going to go" because someone has no recourse is not an argument to extract money from them. You'll have to do better then that...I say respectful
real012 6 months ago
I question this videos accuracy... I will roughly pay $120120 into SS in 35 years of work and if I live to 78 national average..(less then my mom or dad) and start collecting at 66 I will receive $460,680 that's one problem for starters. Two the rich are not the enemy but a scape goat for the most part, no one was complaining when the rich were leading the way for the little guy's 401k to grow as in the 90s. The answer is the close loop holes in taxes (not raise, it will only filter to the work
real012 6 months ago
Dude obviously you've got victimization issues. Have you been victimized? Probably. And good job on calling disabled vets worthless non-contributors. We are all born equal, what we do with the life god has given us determines who we are, even if it's to die gracefully with cancer. We all have things in life we must overcome. Some are tested more than others. We will be rewarded for our perseverance in this life or the next. Its not up to "government" to bare our burdens.
ZO5150 7 months ago
If a company sells toxic goods the free market would get rid of it by consumer choice, aka voting with dollars, and lets not forget the legal system. Also what company denies access based on race? This isn't the 60's. Also not all jobs are "skilled" jobs and do not require the same pay as a trained professional. As a "minority" who started at the bottom and worked hard to advanced I have realized the fruits of hard work and determination, I don't need " The Man's" crutch.
ZO5150 7 months ago
@ZO5150 Yeah, except that some toxins take years to have an effect, so how the hell are consumers going to know which product caused their health problems? That's why we have regulations, retard. Second, there are plenty of racists who would flock to any business that denies blacks. There are over 2,000 racial hate groups in the U.S. Third, congrats on working, give yourself a cookie. Now go tell a double amputee vet or bankrupt cancer patient that they wouldn't be poor if they just work harder.
whatisahumans 7 months ago
@ZO5150 We have the highest corporate taxes in the world. You are entitled to nothing but what you earn. You cannot raise taxes in a recession you ignorant fuck google herbert hoover. It was a disaster. If i ever get rich i wont apoligize for it, neither would you if ur shitty lib videos ever got big an were not laughed at. go learn some shit, better yet, watch the repubs fix shit when obamas gone in 2012. you ignorant fuck
mropinionful 1 month ago
At least this clip got something right. Garbage like this usually does come from some loser coffee dude or first year college student who idolizes ex hippie radical professor. Give me a break. Liberals are more totalitarian than any conservative. If personal freedom and liberty mean anything you lefty pricks would be Libertarians.
ZO5150 7 months ago
@ZO5150 The "freedom" of a corporation to dump toxic waste in our groundwater or sell us products that will give us cancer 30 years later so we have no idea what caused it is not a "personal freedom." The "freedom" of a business to deny people access based on race is not a "personal freedom." The "freedom" of a corporation to pay it's people wages equivalent to those in China (where manufacturing plants install nets outside to prevent suicide jumps), is not a "personal freedom."
whatisahumans 7 months ago
@whatisahumans You are an idiot. Since when is it morally right to force anyone into a program that pays for someone elses safety net. I should have a choice as to whether I want to put my money into an entitlement program. Not only that the money that is collected through taxes is not enough to sustain the number of people using the entitlement programs and was never meant to. The programs were intended to help the few that needed not all these people that are on it. Get your fact straight.
squidwurrd 6 months ago
@squidwurrd While I do agree that programs like public healthcare and welfare need to be reviewed in order to find waste and fraud, a total shutdown of these programs would inevitably lead to chaos and human misery.
juantrippe82 2 weeks ago
@juantrippe82 yea it would be pretty stupid if you cut everything all at one time. But just like people got on the program people can get off the program at the same pace. We much better off before these programs came around and no one was on the streets dying like they are today. These programs only hurt they do not help it's a nice sound bite for those that dont understand economics but in practice it has failed horribly. It's about fixing it's about getting rid of it.
squidwurrd 2 weeks ago
@whatisahumans DON'T BUY PRODUCTS THEN IF YOU'RE CONCERNED ABOUT THEM BEING TOXIC. YOU HAVE NO ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE PRODUCTS. MANUFACTURERS HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO MAKE SAFE PRODUCTS.
leeknivek 1 month ago
@leeknivek Finally, an honest Ron Paul cultists who admits the only reason companies support deregulation is so that they can sell toxic products.
whatisahumans 1 month ago
@whatisahumans You might want to rethink that. Why would a company want to sell toxic products? Would they really sacrifice their reputation solely to make a quick buck? They're greedy, as anyone else. You, me, them, we're all greedy. Self-interest runs the world. To say otherwise is ignorant.
Now, if it's in their best interest to continue to get people to buy their products, why on earth would they make faulty products? That's all the incentive they need. You don't need regulation for it.
leeknivek 1 month ago
@leeknivek Then why do they try when there are regs in place to prevent it?
juantrippe82 2 weeks ago
@juantrippe82 What is a company going to gain from selling you toxic products? If you're dissatisfied, they lose a customer. If they do that a lot, they lose their reputation. Then they go out of business. Why would they EVER want to do that?
leeknivek 2 weeks ago
@leeknivek Are you serious!?!?!? What company is going to tell you that a product is toxic? How are we to tell that a product is toxic? Telepathy?
juantrippe82 2 weeks ago
the money should all just be spread around almost equally if we ever wish to have a good economy. But that is just about impossible with all the rich fucking millionaires that want to become billionaires. fucking snobbish.
claytonhjames 7 months ago
@claytonhjames
So if you have and A in Liberalism 101 and i have a F your going to give me your points so we both have a C? Why would either of us put any effort into the class then? We wouldnt, and we would both be failing. Have you ever gotten a job from a poor man?
podman27 7 months ago
@podman27 Thats not what im saying at all.... im simply stating the fact that there are people in this world that have wayyy to much money and why do they have all the money? BC they own gas companies monopolies ect. they raise the rates on goods and gas or whatever it is they own that they sell just to make more money which is pointless bc they already have enough money to give everybody in africa 500$ lol. Im just saying if things were cheaper, wed all have a lot more money.
claytonhjames 6 months ago
@claytonhjames
Your adressing two subjects, monoplies, and exesive amounts of money. The solution for one is not the solution for the other. Since you started with money, im ignoring the monopolies.
If every 4.0+ student just gave away his points, we would all have a lot higher gpa... right? No. Nobody would have an insentive to succed and thus everyone declines. Rather than stealing their money, how about we give them reasons to spend/invest it?
Ever heard of reganomics? It works.
podman27 6 months ago
@podman27 But you are sayin the same thing you said before. That has nothing to do with what im talkin about.. im not a communist or anything, im just stating the fact that people have to much money. And the people with all that money control other peoples money... like the "little guy". And REAGANOMICS really doesnt come into play with that. You clearly dont understand what im saying.
claytonhjames 6 months ago
@claytonhjames
You said that the money should be spread around almost equaly and that would fix the economy. Equal wealth fits the grades analogy perfectly, the key to fixing the economy really lies in unchaining the engine of the economy wich is what REGONOMICS does. You cant expect people to try to succeed when you prohibit success by trying to equalize it. This isnt pre-school anymore, not everybody gets a shinny medal. In fact, doing so hurts the little guy more than helping!
podman27 6 months ago
@podman27 alright asshole i think i know a thing or two about being the little guy more than you do... but atleast i got a big penis. It helps
claytonhjames 6 months ago
@claytonhjames
Degrading the conversation to such an irrelevant stance is meaningless.
Since you know so much about it, please enlighten us on the benifits of enablement and entitlement mentality. Educate us on how much penalizing those who drive the economy helps everyone. Tell us all about the problems that come with people succeding. As i said before, entitlements are most harmfull to those who use them.
podman27 6 months ago
@podman27 More hyperbole from the Paul/Ayn Rand cultists who since 1980 have enjoyed the highest levels of income while shifting the responsibility of maintaining a decent society to the middle class. I believe libertarianism works best when there is no middle class. That’s what the Austrian/Chicago school economists have conditioned us into thinking we need an obedient working class in order to build a ‘free’ society while dangling the carrot of ‘prosperity’ in front of it.
juantrippe82 2 weeks ago
@podman27 You're comparing apples and oranges.
juantrippe82 2 weeks ago
@claytonhjames Soaking the rich does not make the poor richer, it makes the world poorer.
leeknivek 2 weeks ago
Don't get me wrong. I love these these political animations. They're hilarious. Can I just ask, though. Do you seriously hold these positions? For example, do you believe that it's bad for people to "save the shit out of money?" Anyway... funny stuff.
unfpetition 8 months ago
@unfpetition Saving money isn't a bad idea, especially for people in the lower in middle class who need to save up for emergencies or for retirement. However, saving becomes a problem when individuals are making billions of dollars and letting almost all of it sit in banks to collect interest. It causes serious economic stagnation. If you are trying to kickstart the economy, it is important to give money to people who will spend it, rather than save it.
whatisahumans 8 months ago
@whatisahumans But you do know how savings collect interest, right? Those savings sitting in banks are investments. Businesses and consumers both borrow that money from the bank to purchase items, usually capital goods like machinery, houses, cars, and such. Money that is saved in banks doesn't just "sit in banks". Otherwise, it would not be collecting interest. The banks would be just hoarding the cash in their vaults, which they don't normally do because the banks would then fail.
unfpetition 8 months ago
@unfpetition The problem is that thanks to the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, most deposit money is invested in wall street gambling schemes, toxic assets, and derivatives trading. And not all of the money deposited in banks is invested, some is kept for withdrawal. Giving aid to the lower and middle class creates a new market for goods and services, creating jobs.
whatisahumans 8 months ago
@whatisahumans I think you hit the nail on the head with the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act. In fact, the reason we had to have that it place was due to the government getting involved in the private banking sector with things like the FDIC. Then, of course, the banks do whatever they want with the money because they know they'll just get bailed out anyway. I think we may agree on this, but we need to get the government mainly out of the private sector.
unfpetition 8 months ago