I'm not a NazBol. This comes straight from Marx, Lenin, and Mao. Although NazBols steal certain aspects of our theories and heroes, I am not a NazBol. Do some research before you talk.
I tend to agree that proletariat organizations should not have a priori answers to nationalist questions. They have to be decided in response to the actual social conditions of the time and place.
I think you dont need a real 'national state' to build up true socialism.
Hard to explain in English. Just look at the USSR, a unity of republics and autonomic republics - it's just important that there have been parliaments for the Russians, Ukrainians or even for the Chechens. Through this you can make sure that the people have a platform to speak out for there different interests. Such republics also make sure that no one feels disadvantaged towards other people.
I never really said you needed a true nation-state. I like the idea of what Lenin and Stalin set up in the USSR, but it needs a little more "checks and balances" as we like to say in America. Didn't the USSR eventually become dominated by the Russian SFSR?
Yes of course Stalin made the RSFSR to the dominating republic in the union. During the great war this was necessary if you ask me, but it hadnt really changed after war - even after Stalin's death. But the official rights of the republics like you got them in the constitution of the USSR are even perfect if you ask me.
Even with the dominating RSFSR there hadnt been any big ethnic conflicts in the USSR like nowadays...
Do you think there is a connection between capitalism and bourgeois nationalism? I've always wondered how European nationalism rose right after capitalism became the dominant system.
I think the more conservative kind of capitalism is connected to bourgeois nationalism, and the more liberal kind is also connected to it, but not as seriously. In some ways capitalism is breaking down national barriers, as Marx said in The Communist Manifesto. But in some ways it is enforcing barriers. It is in contradiction with itself.
NazBol FGGT!
Ilikenuman 1 year ago
@Ilikenuman
I'm not a NazBol. This comes straight from Marx, Lenin, and Mao. Although NazBols steal certain aspects of our theories and heroes, I am not a NazBol. Do some research before you talk.
RedNickII 1 year ago
Marxism is a 100% anti-state!
x1600meterman 1 year ago
@x1600meterman
You should watch the video. Socialism is a state, communism isn't. Socialism is the transition phase. Class struggle goes through phases.
RedNickII 1 year ago
I tend to agree that proletariat organizations should not have a priori answers to nationalist questions. They have to be decided in response to the actual social conditions of the time and place.
JayPhilosopher 2 years ago
love the jacket?
OsamaBlnLadin 2 years ago
Thanks. You can get one at almost any Army-Navy surplus store.
RedNickII 2 years ago
I think you dont need a real 'national state' to build up true socialism.
Hard to explain in English. Just look at the USSR, a unity of republics and autonomic republics - it's just important that there have been parliaments for the Russians, Ukrainians or even for the Chechens. Through this you can make sure that the people have a platform to speak out for there different interests. Such republics also make sure that no one feels disadvantaged towards other people.
LeninCK22 2 years ago
I never really said you needed a true nation-state. I like the idea of what Lenin and Stalin set up in the USSR, but it needs a little more "checks and balances" as we like to say in America. Didn't the USSR eventually become dominated by the Russian SFSR?
RedNickII 2 years ago
@RedNickII:
Yes of course Stalin made the RSFSR to the dominating republic in the union. During the great war this was necessary if you ask me, but it hadnt really changed after war - even after Stalin's death. But the official rights of the republics like you got them in the constitution of the USSR are even perfect if you ask me.
Even with the dominating RSFSR there hadnt been any big ethnic conflicts in the USSR like nowadays...
LeninCK22 2 years ago
Hi gasdfw5, it is an iron-on patch. So is the Mao one. I haven't seen V for Vendetta, but I want to.
RedNickII 2 years ago
International Solidarity.
SovietTrall 2 years ago
Do you think there is a connection between capitalism and bourgeois nationalism? I've always wondered how European nationalism rose right after capitalism became the dominant system.
juliaisafilmbuff123 2 years ago
I think the more conservative kind of capitalism is connected to bourgeois nationalism, and the more liberal kind is also connected to it, but not as seriously. In some ways capitalism is breaking down national barriers, as Marx said in The Communist Manifesto. But in some ways it is enforcing barriers. It is in contradiction with itself.
RedNickII 2 years ago