Which is exactly why the Star Wars prequels failed. They had no story. No characterization. Lots of CGI. Lots of sitting on couches and walking in halls talking. Lots of bureaucracy and meetings. It's not Steven's fault, though. Thanks to George Lucas for that one :P
funny how he said basically the opposite of what hitchcock said in the other video (who said content isn't important). on the other hand at the end he says the thrills come automatically if you tell the story right so i guess for him it's a mixture of a good story and telling it right.
Steven Spielberg is good at making money with movies. He's HARDLY a great director. Every once in a while, he makes something which has content which could be called great. Most of the time, he's just a more polished Michael Bay.
@TheTexanCanadian ignorance. Just because he's commercially successful does not mean he can't be a gifted director too. He just chooses films that give an audience an experience. That doesn't mean they are all perfect, but he has given American cinema so many unforgettable experiences and has executed everything with great skill.
@TheTexanCanadian alfred hitchcock is the best filmmaker in cinema history. he made so many famous films, psycho, rear window and birds were all a masterpiece, those violins in the shower scene was so much better than jaws
Oh I definitely agree that he's a better director than Spielberg, just disagree that he's in any way the best filmmaker in cinema history. He's made many great films but saying he's the "best" is a purely subjective statement, it's impossible to be truly objective when it comes to evaluation of the quality of art.
@TheTexanCanadian Hitchcock is the best director ever in cinema history, he was a genius and amazing filmmaker. master of suspense, nobody can be better than him
Stanley Kubrick, Akira Kurosawa, Ingmar Bergman and Fritz Lang are all better directors than Hitchcock, but again that's just my opinion, just like you saying Hitchcock is the greatest is YOUR opinion.
@Gencturk92 I agree. Hitchcock is way better than Spielberg. Actually I can think of several better directors than him. Spielberg makes good movies, but it takes a genius to make a cinematic masterpiece. Orson Wells did it, Hitchcock did it, etc. Tarkovsky is brilliant as well. Spielberg is good but I wouldn't consider him the best.
It's all subjective but I think people overrate Spielberg.
How hard can it be to write "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen"? he has the midas touch but that's a far cry from being a visionary talented creator of images.
A few of you don't know shit about film. He is the EXECUTIVE PRODUCER, he's can do anything on Transformers. He can fire Michael Bay, shit on Fox and fire Shia. He is the boss. Don't defend him. What really happened is that the writers were on strike during the writing of this movie. Finding a good writer wasn't easy. He is in charge of the story, he's incharge of pretty much everything.
@togatoga36 Executive producer is a financial role basically right over the creative line. He handled nothing of the story, he just helped it's business.
@togatoga36 He didn't say there needs to be a story; he only said if you want to make a good story. My guess is he didn't give a shit about Transformers, but knew it would make money. In any event, he certainly knows how to make a thriller. That's unquestionable.
@togatoga36 Yes he did, and NO ONE can fault the production value of Transformers. That's what an executive producer handles, the finances and ideas. He doesn't write or direct so you can't fault him for T2.
@ChrisStuckmann Hey your that guy who reviews movies and does podcast with Jeremy Jahns and the Smoches but I think you should refrain from calling Transformers Revenge of the Fallen T2 because it's really, actually it's similar to Terminator 2 and that movie was great.
@ChrisStuckmann You mean TF2. Don't get Terminator 2, one of the greatest movies of all time, mixed up with Transformers 2, one of the worst movies of all time.
@togatoga36 In his defense Spielberg has a very hand's off policy when it comes to being a producer, he just tries to hire the right people and then not get in their way. Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't.
@togatoga36 Executive Producer just means that he funds the movie. He didn't have anything to do with it. They just tell everyone that he was the Executive Producer in order to get more people to see the movie. I hate the fact that he even allows his name to be thrown around like that :(
@togatoga36 if you were smart, you would know that speilberg had nothing to do with the production/writing/filming of T:ROTF, exec produce means that he attached his name to the project, and has been optioned into the film. He has no input into the creative process in which it was made and doesn't even make appearances on the set. speilberg has exec produced over 200 titles, not all of them are good.
@togatoga36 Be that as it may, it’s a great filmmaker. And it is common knowledge that he wasn’t involved in Transformers 2. One of the selling points of 3 was that Speilberg was involved in the process again. Executive producers are an absent bunch, like how Burton was credited in Schmacher’s Batmans. Burton didn’t have anything to do with those.
@togatoga36 - He was just cashing in to make a profit. People right now unfortunately just want mindless, escapist entertainment. Films that prefer style over substance. As a writer and aspiring filmmaker I see it as an opportunity, to do things that haven't been done.
@togatoga36 Exactly what I was thinking. I wonder if he'll regard those movies as a mistake one day. I don't know, probably not, they made a lot of money, but I always saw him as kind of 50% artist and 50% commercial director. I hope he gets a little more artistically ambitious in the next few years. I'm dreading Indiana Jones 5 and another five years of Transformers.
@togatoga36 Dude chill... he was just looking for profit. As a director it's a fairly normal thing to do. Or he probably had faith in Michael Bay... He's also a great director. Apart from his shitty Transformers Trilogy of course.
I disagree, many of my favourite films have thin to little plots... I think directors like Lynch and PTA are so good at spinning allegory's out of images and sub-texts they never really need a strong plot.. although both have dabbled in rich plotted movies
someone told me all his movies are based on 'orphans', meaning single heroes who are isolated somehow rising above. The theory might apply to e.t, close encounters, but falls apart with Jaws or Munich. Anyone got more ideas on that theory?
@landbridge a lot of Spielberg's movies are about fathers/fatherhood e.g. Jaws, Close Encounters Of The Third Kind and more recently Minority Report (there are a few others)
@landbridge Well, I've heard alot of his movies feature a child with a neglectful father or a father that abandoned their child. That comes from his own personal experience. I don't think he had much of a relationship with his father, or maybe he abandoned him... can't remember. Only movie of his like that that comes to mind though is E.T. You could say War of the Worlds is kinda like that. Indy has a bit of a love/hate relationship with his dad.
Which is exactly why the Star Wars prequels failed. They had no story. No characterization. Lots of CGI. Lots of sitting on couches and walking in halls talking. Lots of bureaucracy and meetings. It's not Steven's fault, though. Thanks to George Lucas for that one :P
PostgodAfterbirth 4 days ago
Munich (2005) = GREAT THRILLER
CriticsBusiness 6 days ago
(Liam Neeson voice): The THRILLS are NOTHING! The STORY is EVERYTHING!
capnhawkins 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ever wonder how a script becomes a film? Visit my blog on my Youtube channel page to find out!
Screenplay12 1 month ago
Let's not ruin a great video from Steven Spielberg by talking about the mind sucking garbage such as Transformers.
mrscreenwriter 2 months ago
Yep. A thriller is a sandwich.
SeantheSkater96 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Clever. At last. I am starting to believe he is a good director
scrtg 3 months ago
it really pisses me of when people call transformers 2 T2.your confusing idiot teenagers who don't even know the greatness of terminator 2.
NOmorecrap85 4 months ago 35
I'm amazed at a lot of the replies here re: Transformers. It doesn't seem to occur to anyone that maybe he just thought that was a good story.
WalterLiddy 4 months ago
funny how he said basically the opposite of what hitchcock said in the other video (who said content isn't important). on the other hand at the end he says the thrills come automatically if you tell the story right so i guess for him it's a mixture of a good story and telling it right.
flandersfails 4 months ago
old enough to be my father but i still think he is sooo good-looking. he's the only older man i find attractive. grrrr!
barkpeeler2000 5 months ago
I like u Steven spielberg, I like u a lot
Oranges8 6 months ago
Steven Spielberg is good at making money with movies. He's HARDLY a great director. Every once in a while, he makes something which has content which could be called great. Most of the time, he's just a more polished Michael Bay.
TheTexanCanadian 9 months ago
@TheTexanCanadian ignorance. Just because he's commercially successful does not mean he can't be a gifted director too. He just chooses films that give an audience an experience. That doesn't mean they are all perfect, but he has given American cinema so many unforgettable experiences and has executed everything with great skill.
Tigerlily21 9 months ago
@Tigerlily21
Oh I agree, the two are not mutually exclusive generally speaking, I'm just denying that he's a tremendously artistically gifted director.
TheTexanCanadian 9 months ago
and what are we supposed to "take home" from this interview, what are we supposed to learn. "the thrills come automatically" ok ok ye sure.
meNtor890 9 months ago
@HopperAvenue Then why watch one of his videos?
AceProductions91 9 months ago
Alfred Hitchcock is the best filmmaker in cinema history, Spielberg is a pet and needs to learn what filmmaking is.
Gencturk92 10 months ago
@Gencturk92
Alfred Hitchcock isn't even the best British filmmaker, much less best filmmaker.
TheTexanCanadian 9 months ago
@TheTexanCanadian alfred hitchcock is the best filmmaker in cinema history. he made so many famous films, psycho, rear window and birds were all a masterpiece, those violins in the shower scene was so much better than jaws
Gencturk92 9 months ago
@Gencturk92
Oh I definitely agree that he's a better director than Spielberg, just disagree that he's in any way the best filmmaker in cinema history. He's made many great films but saying he's the "best" is a purely subjective statement, it's impossible to be truly objective when it comes to evaluation of the quality of art.
TheTexanCanadian 9 months ago
@TheTexanCanadian Hitchcock is the best director ever in cinema history, he was a genius and amazing filmmaker. master of suspense, nobody can be better than him
Gencturk92 9 months ago
@Gencturk92
Stanley Kubrick, Akira Kurosawa, Ingmar Bergman and Fritz Lang are all better directors than Hitchcock, but again that's just my opinion, just like you saying Hitchcock is the greatest is YOUR opinion.
TheTexanCanadian 9 months ago
@Gencturk92 I agree. Hitchcock is way better than Spielberg. Actually I can think of several better directors than him. Spielberg makes good movies, but it takes a genius to make a cinematic masterpiece. Orson Wells did it, Hitchcock did it, etc. Tarkovsky is brilliant as well. Spielberg is good but I wouldn't consider him the best.
It's all subjective but I think people overrate Spielberg.
R3APER24 9 months ago in playlist Film Videos
@TheTexanCanadian Most directors, critics, and film historians would disagree with you. theyshootpictures. com/gf1000_top200directors.htm
ResidentSociopath 8 months ago
@ResidentSociopath
Art is ultimately subjective, I really don't care what other people think about movies that I watch.
TheTexanCanadian 8 months ago
How hard can it be to write "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen"? he has the midas touch but that's a far cry from being a visionary talented creator of images.
cineasta71 10 months ago
A few of you don't know shit about film. He is the EXECUTIVE PRODUCER, he's can do anything on Transformers. He can fire Michael Bay, shit on Fox and fire Shia. He is the boss. Don't defend him. What really happened is that the writers were on strike during the writing of this movie. Finding a good writer wasn't easy. He is in charge of the story, he's incharge of pretty much everything.
nukeadream 10 months ago
@HopperAvenue Philistine.
Kessler1996 11 months ago
Err..2001 fan much?
buc555 1 year ago
Spielberg talking about sandwiches makes me hungry.
generalcircle 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
directorlog 1 year ago
Oh shut up Spielberg, what do you know about thriller genre's. Alfred Hitchcock is the master of thriller genre.
Gencturk92 1 year ago
I totally agree. But, what about character pieces, like MASH?
Wartler 1 year ago
It's weird how he talks about how there needs to be a story when he executive produced "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen".
togatoga36 1 year ago 85
@togatoga36 but he only produced it...he did not wrote it nor direct it...but you had a good point
coolmartcol 1 year ago 2
@coolmartcol Yeah, I figured it was one or the other. He's a terrific filmmaker. But Transformers 2 was just awful.
togatoga36 1 year ago
@togatoga36 Oh my god ! I thought the same thing...
masterkombat 1 year ago
@togatoga36 has to be a story or a nice pay check will do also
megamatt53 1 year ago
Yes, yes he did. And you did what again?
geitepung 1 year ago
@geitepung Watch it.
togatoga36 1 year ago
Hahaha, ye. I'll watch it all right. lmao
geitepung 1 year ago
@togatoga36
LOL
EnzoTheBaker 1 year ago
@togatoga36 Note that this interview was from 2001 [before Transformers premiered in 2007]; so it's outdated, okay?
samwestonc 1 year ago
@samwestonc RIghtly so, I just enjoy its newfound irony.
togatoga36 1 year ago
@togatoga36 Executive producer is a financial role basically right over the creative line. He handled nothing of the story, he just helped it's business.
Infenro 10 months ago 5
@Infenro Bottom line is, Transformers 2 was terrible.
togatoga36 10 months ago
@togatoga36 bottom line is, since I watched Transformers 1 I shit on those movies.
meNtor890 9 months ago
@togatoga36 He didn't write the screenplay so he wasn't in charge of the story
MrThisISMetal 10 months ago
@MrThisISMetal Wrong.
nukeadream 10 months ago
@togatoga36 He didn't say there needs to be a story; he only said if you want to make a good story. My guess is he didn't give a shit about Transformers, but knew it would make money. In any event, he certainly knows how to make a thriller. That's unquestionable.
analyticaa 9 months ago
@analyticaa Agreed :)
togatoga36 9 months ago
Comment removed
GOreelz 9 months ago
@togatoga36 Yes he did, and NO ONE can fault the production value of Transformers. That's what an executive producer handles, the finances and ideas. He doesn't write or direct so you can't fault him for T2.
ChrisStuckmann 8 months ago 9
@ChrisStuckmann Hey your that guy who reviews movies and does podcast with Jeremy Jahns and the Smoches but I think you should refrain from calling Transformers Revenge of the Fallen T2 because it's really, actually it's similar to Terminator 2 and that movie was great.
brandonlamchops 8 months ago
@ChrisStuckmann T2 is Terminator 2. Sorry, but it's taken by a much worthier film.
samsam29 7 months ago
@ChrisStuckmann You mean TF2. Don't get Terminator 2, one of the greatest movies of all time, mixed up with Transformers 2, one of the worst movies of all time.
NolanDisciple01 4 months ago 6
@ChrisStuckmann T2? I don't think he had anything to do with T2. That was James Cameron all the way I believe.
m420carbine4 3 months ago
@m420carbine4 Transformers 2 is what I'm referring to.
ChrisStuckmann 3 months ago
@togatoga36 Cha Ching Cha Ching Cha Ching!
chimpiki 7 months ago
@togatoga36 you know what executive producer means? it means here's some cash. transformers has nothing to do with spielberg. they're not his films.
Fundamenski 7 months ago
@togatoga36 HE WHAT????!!!!
terrycharnley 7 months ago
@togatoga36 I'm pretty sure Michael Bay is to blame for that.
GWScores 7 months ago
@togatoga36 but that's why he didn't direct nor write that piece of garbage. He needs the money to finance his own works. ;)
samsam29 7 months ago
@togatoga36 In his defense Spielberg has a very hand's off policy when it comes to being a producer, he just tries to hire the right people and then not get in their way. Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't.
PalmliX 7 months ago
@togatoga36 Micheal Bay directed that. :/
thechallenger9000 7 months ago
@togatoga36 and executive producer doesnt do much to effect the film other than his name to attract viewers
mrrickless980abell 6 months ago
@togatoga36 Executive Producer just means that he funds the movie. He didn't have anything to do with it. They just tell everyone that he was the Executive Producer in order to get more people to see the movie. I hate the fact that he even allows his name to be thrown around like that :(
MStrikerPictures 6 months ago
@togatoga36 if you were smart, you would know that speilberg had nothing to do with the production/writing/filming of T:ROTF, exec produce means that he attached his name to the project, and has been optioned into the film. He has no input into the creative process in which it was made and doesn't even make appearances on the set. speilberg has exec produced over 200 titles, not all of them are good.
patrickf245 6 months ago
@togatoga36 Be that as it may, it’s a great filmmaker. And it is common knowledge that he wasn’t involved in Transformers 2. One of the selling points of 3 was that Speilberg was involved in the process again. Executive producers are an absent bunch, like how Burton was credited in Schmacher’s Batmans. Burton didn’t have anything to do with those.
BradleyPaulValentine 6 months ago
@togatoga36 No contradiction. He only said that story is important to a GOOD thriller.
GilbertSmith 5 months ago
@togatoga36 are you seriously forgetting ALL the classics this guy put out?
almightyhans 5 months ago
@togatoga36 - He was just cashing in to make a profit. People right now unfortunately just want mindless, escapist entertainment. Films that prefer style over substance. As a writer and aspiring filmmaker I see it as an opportunity, to do things that haven't been done.
JesusCristo2002 5 months ago
@togatoga36 Exactly what I was thinking. I wonder if he'll regard those movies as a mistake one day. I don't know, probably not, they made a lot of money, but I always saw him as kind of 50% artist and 50% commercial director. I hope he gets a little more artistically ambitious in the next few years. I'm dreading Indiana Jones 5 and another five years of Transformers.
FriedEggsWithChips 5 months ago
@togatoga36 Dude chill... he was just looking for profit. As a director it's a fairly normal thing to do. Or he probably had faith in Michael Bay... He's also a great director. Apart from his shitty Transformers Trilogy of course.
WaterCrystalline 4 months ago
@togatoga36 True.I like a good plot yet there's that movie.>.>
killerrodan 4 months ago
@togatoga36 As a producer he probably doesn't care as much as a director. I guess.
maxulic 4 months ago
I disagree, many of my favourite films have thin to little plots... I think directors like Lynch and PTA are so good at spinning allegory's out of images and sub-texts they never really need a strong plot.. although both have dabbled in rich plotted movies
HotSpicyTasteGreat 1 year ago
Ah Spielberg, the man who ruled my childhood. I remember making my parents take me to see ET at least three times.
originalprettybird 1 year ago
True words of wisdom, from the greatest man to ever walk the earth! :D
mfnstudioschannel 1 year ago
I completely agree with him, when I go watch a movie - yeah effects are good too - but if it doesn't have a good story I end up bored.
AngelOmega777 1 year ago
someone told me all his movies are based on 'orphans', meaning single heroes who are isolated somehow rising above. The theory might apply to e.t, close encounters, but falls apart with Jaws or Munich. Anyone got more ideas on that theory?
landbridge 1 year ago
@landbridge a lot of Spielberg's movies are about fathers/fatherhood e.g. Jaws, Close Encounters Of The Third Kind and more recently Minority Report (there are a few others)
MaybeYesNo90 1 year ago
@MaybeYesNo90 family men... can't believe I forgot to mention Saving Private Ryan
MaybeYesNo90 1 year ago
@landbridge Well, I've heard alot of his movies feature a child with a neglectful father or a father that abandoned their child. That comes from his own personal experience. I don't think he had much of a relationship with his father, or maybe he abandoned him... can't remember. Only movie of his like that that comes to mind though is E.T. You could say War of the Worlds is kinda like that. Indy has a bit of a love/hate relationship with his dad.
JDBCreations 1 year ago
No one director is the best ever, 'cause opinions differ. It comes down to taste. I love his movies as a kid though. Jaws, Indiana Jones etc.
macflyfilm 1 year ago
I beg to differ
SM17H 1 year ago
best director ever ..
DxxStudios 1 year ago 41
@DxxStudios Yeah right.
Hallinilla9 1 year ago
@DxxStudios not
cr33pyGamer 1 year ago
@DxxStudios
pls stop you are making me laugh.
Darthmonk3y 1 year ago
@DxxStudios Best entertainer ever
NEDBASKERVILLE 8 months ago
@DxxStudios what do you think about christopher nolan?
1Minute60Seconds 5 months ago
@1Minute60Seconds That he is the past out of the past decade-ish.
jdogsguitar 5 months ago
@jdogsguitar what????
1Minute60Seconds 5 months ago
@1Minute60Seconds The best is what I meant. Not the past. I replied and meant that I think Nolan is the best to come out of the past decade-ish.
jdogsguitar 4 months ago
@jdogsguitar Oh ok. Yeah he sure is brilliant :) My favorite director
1Minute60Seconds 4 months ago
@DxxStudios you know you know you know,.... if we know, why tell us
maciejwrotek 5 months ago