a perfect example of the way you don"t play note's, richter NEVER understoode the meaning of music, for him only the "form" was interesting, never emotion or creativity. he is togheter with pollini the greatest mistake in music history. Every one who likes this kind of piano playing does not know what real music making is. very very sad.
@onlymusiciansallowed Bach must be played exact tempo, Richter does it, that is why he is so popular. The musical schools on the other side of Atlantic haven't kept the strict traditions of Viennese Classical School, so grow to his level, and then criticize him.
@vahagnvardanyan there is just one way to play music: with the heart, all other methods are a lie. Strict traditions... the word "tradition" explains itself: no creativity, only reproducing what others already did. Richter and pollini are perfect examples of non-creative pianists (and I do not use the word "musician"). They have no clue that music must come from the heart and not the mind.
@onlymusiciansallowed If I truly in my heart wanted to play Bach holding down the pedal from beginning to end and using enormous amounts of rubato, it would sound ugly and extemely tasteless. The mind is necessary to funnel heart in the right direction. Cortot is a perfect example of this, which is why I love him so much. He has made some of the most passionate and heartfelt recordings I know, but his interpretations still rest on a rock solid foundation of the intellect.
@Pianoplayer002 intellect has nothing to do with the heard mr spock. Cortot is indeed a very good interpret, but horowitz, fiorentino, pogorolich, katchen, keene, volondat, cziffra, francois and so many others also, and they did not came from that "strict school". Just one way to play music: with your heart. all the other ways are a lie. Richter and pollini are lies. they never produced a honest note of music. only mathematics
To my ear, Richter genius is that he infuses the music with more emotion, even when playing faster than others. For example, Gould usually sounds precise and dry, in comparison.
For some Bach i prefer the slower interpretations but for this piece Richter works the best for me. I also love the Gilels Siloti B minor video on YT.
You are absolutely right, it's a matter of preference. And I think Richters plays this too fast, I love the tempo Gould have on it. Especially the pelude. Another plus for Gould on the prelude is that he ends it in E-minor, instead of E-major, as normally done on pieces in a minor key.
Che cosa vuoi sapere, è meglio non sapere... che cosa vuoi aggiungere, nulla si può aggiungere... e ancora dicono che la perfezione non esiste? E' rara... estremamente rara ma, come la mosca bianca, esiste!
It is actually very good piano playing that makes that possible. You need to have a contrapuntal ear to play like this. I cannot think of anyone around today who really plays like this.
One of the great advantages of the piano is that you can have dynamic contrast. I wish Richter would have done more in the fugue. Also, it seems incredibly RH heavy which is not really the right style for a fugue. Try playing on a harpsichord just to see what Bach would have heard and you will hear that the bass is very strong and by no means is the treble dominant. I still prefer playing on the piano however, for the possible range of sound is limitless.
I just love ALL of these - Please try and complete the whole set VERY SOON - And thanks for all the very hard work you have put in to make these truly magical pieces become even more entertaining.
@PoopShitMario HAH you should listen to my man Richter's WTC Book 1 Prelude and Fugue 1 and compare it to Glenn's performance. You don't even need to reply back mate.
a perfect example of the way you don"t play note's, richter NEVER understoode the meaning of music, for him only the "form" was interesting, never emotion or creativity. he is togheter with pollini the greatest mistake in music history. Every one who likes this kind of piano playing does not know what real music making is. very very sad.
onlymusiciansallowed 3 weeks ago
@onlymusiciansallowed Bach must be played exact tempo, Richter does it, that is why he is so popular. The musical schools on the other side of Atlantic haven't kept the strict traditions of Viennese Classical School, so grow to his level, and then criticize him.
BTW Richter and Gilels have the same teacher.
vahagnvardanyan 2 weeks ago
@vahagnvardanyan there is just one way to play music: with the heart, all other methods are a lie. Strict traditions... the word "tradition" explains itself: no creativity, only reproducing what others already did. Richter and pollini are perfect examples of non-creative pianists (and I do not use the word "musician"). They have no clue that music must come from the heart and not the mind.
onlymusiciansallowed 2 weeks ago
@onlymusiciansallowed If I truly in my heart wanted to play Bach holding down the pedal from beginning to end and using enormous amounts of rubato, it would sound ugly and extemely tasteless. The mind is necessary to funnel heart in the right direction. Cortot is a perfect example of this, which is why I love him so much. He has made some of the most passionate and heartfelt recordings I know, but his interpretations still rest on a rock solid foundation of the intellect.
Pianoplayer002 2 weeks ago
@Pianoplayer002 intellect has nothing to do with the heard mr spock. Cortot is indeed a very good interpret, but horowitz, fiorentino, pogorolich, katchen, keene, volondat, cziffra, francois and so many others also, and they did not came from that "strict school". Just one way to play music: with your heart. all the other ways are a lie. Richter and pollini are lies. they never produced a honest note of music. only mathematics
onlymusiciansallowed 2 weeks ago
To my ear, Richter genius is that he infuses the music with more emotion, even when playing faster than others. For example, Gould usually sounds precise and dry, in comparison.
RolfParkerHoughton 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi,i am looking for a fugue speciallist to tell me what is that chromatic fugue:
youtube.com/watch?v=yotypIIavlQ&list=HL1326399726&feature=mh_lolz
I found it as notes and then i made it with a music notation program
Enlightenment82 1 month ago
This vid is popular on Sarajevo
yronwyatt49b 1 month ago
This video went viral on Macedonia
indseytate718l 2 months ago
everytime i hear someone play the piano on the radio and think that the pianist is playing the piece fast, it´s always richter ^^
StreetPerforming 3 months ago
Richter is the best on well tempered clavier!!!!!!
Petrokwstas 4 months ago
A tad too fast for my taste...
Polydactyl13 6 months ago
What a super genius Bach was, the prelude is epic..
krokigrygg 8 months ago
you play pretty good man, but a little too fast for my taste. you're still great!
yumeybaconcutout 10 months ago
@yumeybaconcutout hmmm, is Richter playing.
hellboyreloaded 9 months ago
absolutely fascinating!!!!!!
tatre111 10 months ago in playlist WTC richter
it is not in E minor, it sounds like F minor, it sounds like a tone up.
LaKritika 10 months ago
a bit too fast....
piann00b 11 months ago
The bass here is the Melody in the (Bach/Siloti) prelude in B minor.
vshagoyan 11 months ago
sublime... qué recuerdos
carlosLor 1 year ago
音は空気の振動。
響きは空気を長く振わせること。
すなわち響きは音の空気化だろう。
響きを援用した音楽は何をしているかといえば死の力を借りて音楽をしている。このリヒテルなんかの場合がそう。逆に意識的に響きを抑制する音楽というものがあるものだ。それは何をしたいのかといえば、音の粒子やら情報やらを矢継ぎ早に流し続けようとする意志なのだ。音をひたすら流れさすこと。そこでは響きは邪魔なのだ。その良い例がグールドのバッハピアノ曲に出てると思う。スタッカート奏法はこの場合実に有効な技法。これに近似する意思はさかもっさんの「音楽図鑑」に聴くことができる。
MKawarada 1 year ago
the best version :D
Oscarbrash 1 year ago
Ah! Finally a recording of the Fugue that doesn't try to be faster than the speed of light ;) Beautiful version!
DBroeders 1 year ago
bach .....
MarjanJanczyk 1 year ago
The presto and from there on is fantastic.
EvanWaggerman 1 year ago
Here we observe richter flossing his teeth
dasklavierleben 1 year ago
For some Bach i prefer the slower interpretations but for this piece Richter works the best for me. I also love the Gilels Siloti B minor video on YT.
LversusKira 1 year ago
bach stupefies me on a daily basis
his output is truly a staggering feat of the human imagination
brenonion 1 year ago 3
@brenonion
I agree. Bach is simply mind blowing...It's not just Bach's output.
Afterall Telemann wrote much more than him...it's that every one of his
pieces is a masterpiece. It's his output of masterpieces. Even if he wrote
the 15 inventions he would (to me) be a brilliant composer.
hoodloom22 1 year ago
Bach, the greatest genius in music.
RedWasabii 1 year ago 4
He must've been out of position at 2:34. I doubt he meant to sound so disjointed there.
from the D7 to the G7
3rd to last measure on that page..
jerbiebarb 2 years ago
This treatment really jumps out, depending on what mood i'm in i might like this, or a slower performance.
LversusKira 2 years ago
Perfection exists!
Sofoclaudio 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Glenn Gould plays this way better, and he sings as well. Doesn't get much better than that.
Fr00Luna 2 years ago
A matter of preference, perhaps? I didn't enjoy the staccato treatment of the left hand by Gould as much.
jojobruin 2 years ago
You are absolutely right, it's a matter of preference. And I think Richters plays this too fast, I love the tempo Gould have on it. Especially the pelude. Another plus for Gould on the prelude is that he ends it in E-minor, instead of E-major, as normally done on pieces in a minor key.
Fr00Luna 2 years ago
+1
it is right
Aereliz 2 years ago
Che cosa vuoi sapere, è meglio non sapere... che cosa vuoi aggiungere, nulla si può aggiungere... e ancora dicono che la perfezione non esiste? E' rara... estremamente rara ma, come la mosca bianca, esiste!
zarevic 2 years ago
Eternal wisdon, everlasting beauty, timeless harmony
musiccritic1910 2 years ago
The fuge is the proof that Bach was really a mankind's genius!!!!!
iguarni 2 years ago
I think that prelude bears more philosophical meaning then fuga. It sounds like the creation of the world..as everything in bach according to Goethe
musiccritic1910 2 years ago
ah, non avevo precisato che sono 25 anni che studio pianoforte
beautyguys 2 years ago
sono tre anni che la studio insieme agli altri pezzi dell'esame e ancora non riesco a suonarla bene, che debba smettere di studiare il pianoforte?
beautyguys 2 years ago
Il Bach di Richter mi piace davvero molto
frederickfrederikfre 2 years ago
AWESOME!
iguarni 2 years ago
The fugue almost sounds like it's two pianos playing.. but of course, it's just Bach's genius...
werq34ac 2 years ago 16
Ahhh the beauty of the fugue :-)
TwelfthRoot2 2 years ago
It is actually very good piano playing that makes that possible. You need to have a contrapuntal ear to play like this. I cannot think of anyone around today who really plays like this.
simonsmatthew 1 year ago
@werq34ac i concur he is very smart
kira456love 1 year ago
sure piano sounds great. but i just love that old crappy harpichord's sound. but it's just a taste matter.
nice version indeed.
GoodNamesWereUsed 2 years ago
One of the great advantages of the piano is that you can have dynamic contrast. I wish Richter would have done more in the fugue. Also, it seems incredibly RH heavy which is not really the right style for a fugue. Try playing on a harpsichord just to see what Bach would have heard and you will hear that the bass is very strong and by no means is the treble dominant. I still prefer playing on the piano however, for the possible range of sound is limitless.
Iain0408 2 years ago
is it just me or is this really romantic in style?
yimack 2 years ago
why in the fugue he gives more importance to the subtheme than the theme (sorry for my english)
laureanobruno 2 years ago
wenn das nicht göttliche musik ist.....
Richter ist der beste ever !
art4ever1 2 years ago
Fantástico! Realmente esta es la mejor interpretacion que he escuchado
laureanobruno 2 years ago
wasn't this meant for harpsichord?
lwnf360 2 years ago
All Baroque pieces and many classical pieces are but that doesn't mean pianists aren't allowed to play these kinds of pieces does it?
alexkonow 2 years ago
It sounds messy on the piano. I would prefer a harpsichord version.
lwnf360 2 years ago
That's your opinion but people have been playing "harpsichord pieces" on the piano for centuries.
alexkonow 2 years ago
I'd rather listen to it on a piano, harpsichord is just annoying.
Sshelly34213 2 years ago
i see what you are saying. harpsichord is alright in very small doses.
revorrah 2 years ago
Yea I can take it in small doses, plus enjoy the sound of a piano much more.
Sshelly34213 2 years ago
I agree.. Small doses
Mahlercougar 2 years ago
The Prelude in C minor is awesome on harpsichord.. try it
pianowink 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I just love ALL of these - Please try and complete the whole set VERY SOON - And thanks for all the very hard work you have put in to make these truly magical pieces become even more entertaining.
pianojeans 3 years ago
When can we expect the b flat minor bwv 867? I am in love with that piece!
davymc91 3 years ago
Inhuman.
Astonishing.
framaulo 3 years ago
I'm agree with 'beryllium2'.
my favorite preludes are this and nº1 in C major
MarquezSouza 3 years ago
IT'S BEAUTIFUL!
Ritcher is amazing!
Thank you for upload :)
MarquezSouza 3 years ago
This prelude is one of the most beautiful.
beryllium2 3 years ago
This is a fantastic composition !!!!!
dzeljpiano 3 years ago
Lol "Isn't Glen Gouldish enough"! PAH!! Guess what THIS IS RICHTER!!!!!!!
Chopianist3 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This recording isn't Glenn Gouldish enough.
PoopShitMario 3 years ago
Hmm, I have to say, if I want it to be Glenn Gouldish I listen to Glenn Gould.
Pianoplayer002 3 years ago 28
@Pianoplayer002 I agree! I can never quite understand how Gould gets that ,semi-staccato' in the left hand, and such character in the melody.
PhillipFawcettPiano 1 year ago
@PoopShitMario
So we call this Richter
animumaurarium 1 year ago
@PoopShitMario HAH you should listen to my man Richter's WTC Book 1 Prelude and Fugue 1 and compare it to Glenn's performance. You don't even need to reply back mate.
Bassoonater 1 year ago 2
@Bassoonater ain't that the truth?! It's like the soul of the music has been removed.
vshagoyan 9 months ago
Fugue starts at 1:54.
hornuser 3 years ago 2
His lucidity is astounding. Every note exactly where it should be.
pyroprince78 3 years ago 3
Listen to Glenn Gould play this.
dizygotegemini 3 years ago
mmmm .... didn't know it was played thus !
3NUNS 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
very nice performance but i think it needs more expression, specially the fugue needs some changes in tempo
waeman 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
In dynamics also.
moonybg 3 years ago
What a pianist Richter was!
KeithWhalen11 3 years ago 4
I Love this to see THE WORK & hear at ones THE MASTER ! Thank you Pianoplayer002!
sam0xin 3 years ago
Bach is an incredible composer,pheraps the best i think.His music is very beautiful and perfect in each aspect.
I love it!:)great post
Mirkitarrista 3 years ago 7
Grateful to you for sharing -
indigoblue555 3 years ago
great post thank you so much
thegoddescomposer 3 years ago 2