i cant wait for this to happen... we can then see if the pac-10 ( new pac whatever) can compare to the big boys in the sec and big 10. this is a perfect chance to see who really deserves bcs title games and so on. it would have been better if texas and oklahoma and others joined, but whatever. this will make college football much much better and competitive
Place your finger on a map, right in the center of the Pac 10, your finger is resting on Fresno! Geographic makes sense, and Fresno 2008 champs baseball, top basketball arena too!
Why don't they add the State of Nevada? (UNLV and Nevada) There right next door to all the PAC-10 schools and also have the same size enrollments too (bigger crowds). They could make a North and South division and have a championship game.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
the pac 10 would never let in two other teams that could possibly be a threat to usc. we all know usc is the only real college football team in the pac 10. and by letting in two other teams, that would make usc's schedule tougher than the cupcake schedule that it is.
You mean that Pac-10 that went what, 5-0 in bowl games last year. Riiiiiight. You must be a SEC fan. They may have some good (but highly overrated) football teams, but at least students who go to Pac-10 schools go to real universities, and get an education. Cant say that for the SEC..
A threat to USC? Then they better get rid of Oregon. Looks like it's the WAC for the Quack.
Come on, I don't think the Pac-10 is cool to expansion beacause they want help USC and no one else. Besides, USC would still be big-time contenders even with a couple of extra teams from Utah.
The PAC-10 needs to get some extra teams. That could help the PAC-10 get more teams in bowl games as well have four or five ranked teams, instead of the usual three. The "every team play each other" always screw up the PAC-10 teams in the Top 25
fresno state would be good because, even though they usually lose, they compete well against those big teams. it would put them in there just to have them be a number so they can have a championship.
byu or failing that utah and colorado. tv market, research institutions and academic rankings, tv markets, tradition,large multisport athletic budget, recruiting area. we wanted the texas market but all we can get there is tcu and tcu fails a number of criteria. we will have to keep a higher amount of in conference games and games against at least one east coast (or traditional) ooc bcs team unlike the acc or sec. we can make up with WAC/Big Sky cupcakes and fly some Sunbelt teams in.
They might want to consider UNLV as a serious candidate. It is in a fairly large TV market, fits the geographical footprint, and is an excellent travel destination city. Granted the football program needs a little work, but throw some BCS money at it and it would be respectable. UNLV is on a serious up swing in b-ball.. UNLV also has some other decent sports programs. Not only that, it is the premere academic institution in Nevada.
No way. Why would all 10 university presidents vote to give some of their money to 2 other schools? There aren't any viable candidates, the last 2 schools offered conference membership were Texas and Colorado. The reason to add teams is to increase tv revenue and recruiting grounds, not to give the mid majors a chance at being in a BCS conference.
Add Byu & Utah to the Pac-10 north with, Wash, Wazzu, Ore and Ore St. Then Cal, Stan, USC, UCLA and ASU, Arizona in the south. Play all 5 divisional opponents and 4 of 6 in the other division.
Each team plays 2 regions in the other division and misses 1 region.
Example Cal doesn't play the Washingtons year 1, the Oregons year 2, the Utah's year 3.
Washington doesn't play the Bay Area teams in year 1, the LA teams in year 2, the Arizona teams in year 3.
its never gonna happen if it is the only team they would even consider taking is byu, because the pac 10 would only take a team with history, money, tradition and facilities. Hawaii doesn't have that, fresno hahaha pac 10 would never take them with their history of getting in trouble. Boise is a one sport school, Utah possibly maybe could get in. But i think the best choice for all these schools is Boise, Nevada and UTEP joins the MWC and then it should be BCS, UTEP cuz they have facilities
This is what I have been saying for a while now. Add another BCS conference essentially. I think you picked the right teams for the conference. Boise State, Nevada, UTEP, Utah, BYU, TCU, Hawaii, and possibly Fresno State. That would make a good strong conference. And I think that would be a strong enough conference and should earn their conference champ a lock in to the BCS.
If this were to happen, BYU, Hawaii, Fresno St., or Utah would be the most likely candidates. You have to look at the entire athletic program instead of just one sport. All four teams generally field strong teams. Like in basketball, volleyball, baseball, etc. Other than football, what else is Boise St. known for? No disrespect towards the broncos.
if any team were gonna make it in the pac10 it would be fresno state...we have a good football team,basketball team, a ranked baseball softball and golf team,and were geaografically in the pac 10...CHEA!!!!
wow . . what a grand idea . .. creating a western BCS conference . .this might show those other BCS conferences that we have what it takes to compete .. . look at Boise State and Hawaii . .. GO WAC!!
Not gonna happen. What the better MWC, C-USA, and WAC teams should do is create their own BCS conference (8th BCS division in the country). western states are underrepresented by the current system. I propose a nine or ten team conference to even things up for these kind of schools. Come on---if UConn, Minnesota, and Baylor get to play with the big boys, so should these teams:
the pac -10 is going to become the 12-pac
808iwalani808 1 year ago
i cant wait for this to happen... we can then see if the pac-10 ( new pac whatever) can compare to the big boys in the sec and big 10. this is a perfect chance to see who really deserves bcs title games and so on. it would have been better if texas and oklahoma and others joined, but whatever. this will make college football much much better and competitive
666Raiderpride 1 year ago
Place your finger on a map, right in the center of the Pac 10, your finger is resting on Fresno! Geographic makes sense, and Fresno 2008 champs baseball, top basketball arena too!
ronpauleducates 1 year ago
chuym11 1 year ago
@chuym11 i would rather have colorado and oklahoma in the PAC 10 than hawaii or boise state.
metalkrush77 1 year ago
@metalkrush77 Oklahoma? They arn't even near the Pacific ocean!
zachattack5008 1 year ago
@zachattack5008 dude who cares theres teams like that all over the country luisianna being one ( wac)
666Raiderpride 1 year ago
I hope Utah and BYU join the PAC-10.
fherlinn 1 year ago
do NOT take BOISE STATE JUNIOR COLLEGE.
OVERRATED.
rstroup27 1 year ago
Take "THE BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY"!
bsufanz 2 years ago
Why don't they add the State of Nevada? (UNLV and Nevada) There right next door to all the PAC-10 schools and also have the same size enrollments too (bigger crowds). They could make a North and South division and have a championship game.
ehtx1 2 years ago
Comment removed
ehtx1 2 years ago
Fresno State and some other team in the west time zone would be my recommendation!!!
robins82 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the pac 10 would never let in two other teams that could possibly be a threat to usc. we all know usc is the only real college football team in the pac 10. and by letting in two other teams, that would make usc's schedule tougher than the cupcake schedule that it is.
gmussina 2 years ago
You are a fucking moron...All you do is go on Pac-10 videos and bash USC/The Pac-10 for no reason...Grow up...Get a fucking life...Seriously.
jobobfields 2 years ago 5
You mean that Pac-10 that went what, 5-0 in bowl games last year. Riiiiiight. You must be a SEC fan. They may have some good (but highly overrated) football teams, but at least students who go to Pac-10 schools go to real universities, and get an education. Cant say that for the SEC..
J12Anderson 2 years ago 3
oregon? bitch 47-20
Tr1ckP1ay 2 years ago 2
A threat to USC? Then they better get rid of Oregon. Looks like it's the WAC for the Quack.
Come on, I don't think the Pac-10 is cool to expansion beacause they want help USC and no one else. Besides, USC would still be big-time contenders even with a couple of extra teams from Utah.
JimmySand9 2 years ago
The PAC-10 needs to get some extra teams. That could help the PAC-10 get more teams in bowl games as well have four or five ranked teams, instead of the usual three. The "every team play each other" always screw up the PAC-10 teams in the Top 25
W3sTWorldOrd3r 3 years ago
Look at Boise State track record compared to ANY Non-Bcs football program including this years 12-0 2008 season.....
Last 6 years home record- 38-1 (97%)
Overall Record since 1999 season- 114-24 (82%)
All-time WAC Conference Record- 60-6 (90%)
Won the WAC Conference 6 out of last 7 years.
No matter what level of football you play, you have to show up EVERY SINGLE week and play the game.
socalbsu 3 years ago
pick up boise st. and utah,would be perfect
mwk89 3 years ago
I say the Pac 10 picks up TCU and Boise State.
aberfitch82 3 years ago
fresno state would be good because, even though they usually lose, they compete well against those big teams. it would put them in there just to have them be a number so they can have a championship.
1radstallion 3 years ago
byu or failing that utah and colorado. tv market, research institutions and academic rankings, tv markets, tradition,large multisport athletic budget, recruiting area. we wanted the texas market but all we can get there is tcu and tcu fails a number of criteria. we will have to keep a higher amount of in conference games and games against at least one east coast (or traditional) ooc bcs team unlike the acc or sec. we can make up with WAC/Big Sky cupcakes and fly some Sunbelt teams in.
ellisdrummond 3 years ago
They might want to consider UNLV as a serious candidate. It is in a fairly large TV market, fits the geographical footprint, and is an excellent travel destination city. Granted the football program needs a little work, but throw some BCS money at it and it would be respectable. UNLV is on a serious up swing in b-ball.. UNLV also has some other decent sports programs. Not only that, it is the premere academic institution in Nevada.
rebelbandman 3 years ago
the pac-10 woould lose there prestigousness if they added fresno state
shelldrake1 3 years ago
Fresno Baby, We are the only ones that take on the big boys and win. "Anybody anywhere anytime", Just ask are Baseball Team-2008 National Champs!
crazywetto1 3 years ago
No way. Why would all 10 university presidents vote to give some of their money to 2 other schools? There aren't any viable candidates, the last 2 schools offered conference membership were Texas and Colorado. The reason to add teams is to increase tv revenue and recruiting grounds, not to give the mid majors a chance at being in a BCS conference.
coug09 3 years ago
Add Byu & Utah to the Pac-10 north with, Wash, Wazzu, Ore and Ore St. Then Cal, Stan, USC, UCLA and ASU, Arizona in the south. Play all 5 divisional opponents and 4 of 6 in the other division.
Each team plays 2 regions in the other division and misses 1 region.
Example Cal doesn't play the Washingtons year 1, the Oregons year 2, the Utah's year 3.
Washington doesn't play the Bay Area teams in year 1, the LA teams in year 2, the Arizona teams in year 3.
bigfilmhat 3 years ago 8
its never gonna happen if it is the only team they would even consider taking is byu, because the pac 10 would only take a team with history, money, tradition and facilities. Hawaii doesn't have that, fresno hahaha pac 10 would never take them with their history of getting in trouble. Boise is a one sport school, Utah possibly maybe could get in. But i think the best choice for all these schools is Boise, Nevada and UTEP joins the MWC and then it should be BCS, UTEP cuz they have facilities
TheTruth821990 4 years ago
This is what I have been saying for a while now. Add another BCS conference essentially. I think you picked the right teams for the conference. Boise State, Nevada, UTEP, Utah, BYU, TCU, Hawaii, and possibly Fresno State. That would make a good strong conference. And I think that would be a strong enough conference and should earn their conference champ a lock in to the BCS.
Willziac08 3 years ago
If this were to happen, BYU, Hawaii, Fresno St., or Utah would be the most likely candidates. You have to look at the entire athletic program instead of just one sport. All four teams generally field strong teams. Like in basketball, volleyball, baseball, etc. Other than football, what else is Boise St. known for? No disrespect towards the broncos.
ehwatulike 4 years ago
if any team were gonna make it in the pac10 it would be fresno state...we have a good football team,basketball team, a ranked baseball softball and golf team,and were geaografically in the pac 10...CHEA!!!!
Citiboy91 4 years ago
wow . . what a grand idea . .. creating a western BCS conference . .this might show those other BCS conferences that we have what it takes to compete .. . look at Boise State and Hawaii . .. GO WAC!!
buddyca1 4 years ago
a western BCS conference...is that a joke, the PAC-10 IS a BCS conference with the champion going to the rose bowl at the end of the year.
dallamyr01 4 years ago
nevada? i rather have boise state in the pac-10
iriegurl21 4 years ago
NEVADA!
NVtraveler 4 years ago
Hawaii and Fresno must stay in the WAC
rollercoasterfweak 4 years ago
They should change the PAC 10 to 12 PAC hahahah lol...
tagalicude 4 years ago 3
Not gonna happen. What the better MWC, C-USA, and WAC teams should do is create their own BCS conference (8th BCS division in the country). western states are underrepresented by the current system. I propose a nine or ten team conference to even things up for these kind of schools. Come on---if UConn, Minnesota, and Baylor get to play with the big boys, so should these teams:
Boise
BYU
Utah
Hawai'i
Fresno
TCU
UNLV or SD St.
Wyoming
Houston
fweeeew 4 years ago 7
agreed, then they could also get better talent by maybe pulling off a few upsets
NDirish2112 4 years ago
Sd State, UNLV, Wyoming? Why the hell do they deserve to go in that conference? Replace them with New Mexico, Nevada, and Air Force.
ColoradoTypewriter 4 years ago
That would be something, but the wac would be horrible without teams like fresno state, boise state or hawaii
condoit123 4 years ago
im glad someone finally recognizes tradition on the west coast
JDillaYO 4 years ago 2
LOL! i made Hawaii get an invitation to the PAC 10 kicking out Stanford to the WAC in NCAA Football 08... video games haha
RTJP808 4 years ago