What is not adequately explained in the video is why the old procedure was considered by the pilots to be more effective at reducing landing distance.
Whether you pull both the levers to idle and then continue with either one or both of them what's the difference in engine performance?
Only explanation I can think of is that the pilot would be able to engage full reverse throttle faster by pulling on only one lever rather than two but then again is this an exercise in strength?
The people that express disbelief at experienced pilots making such a basic mistake have obviously never studied human factors. As a pilot there is an optimal level of stress at which your performance is also optimal - anything above or below this will cause your performance to deteriorate. Experience is valuable in that it reduces the likelihood of a situation being stressful for an individual however if they do become overly stressed then their performance is liable to falter regardless.
The echo is funny... "I've got concentrate....concentrate....concentrate....I've got concentrate....concentrate....concentrate.... Hello....... echo...... Now batting....."
This accident still doesn't make any sense. Why would ANY aircraft have their engines running at full-power during final approach and landing??? I guess TO/GA never occurred to a group of "experienced" pilots. Grant it, we'll never know how the brain processes logic when put in a serious situation like that, but I don't understand how the pilots continued to try and stop an already compromised aircraft with one reverser operating, on a short runway... instead of executing a go-around.
I refuse to believe that two highly experience "Captains" flying together would make such basic mistake, that even private pilots would know how to avoid!! That investigation isn't right!! something is really fishy about it...
@davidrubiomartin I understand what you're saying, but imagine yourself falling from a tall building... wouldn't you be desperate seeing death in front of you, but at the same time, wouldn't you try to grab on to something? anything at all? On landings pilots are trained to keep their hands on the throttles @night or day... see what I'm saying?
@betasso1000 It doesn't matter how experienced the crew is. The plain simple fact is they are still human and mistakes are always a possibility. Check out the "Panic over the Pacific" episode. No stressful landing situation there. A simple engine out situation and the pilot forgetting to apply left rudder & other crew mistakes led to that crazy situation. If they hadn't come out of cloud cover when they did, they most likely would of crashed and i doubt they would of been able to figure out why.
Its not so much the runways fault as it is the pilots that land on it.
I don't see them shutting it down in rainy or wet weather anytime soon, it's the safest thing but can the airport make a profit like that? In the end it all comes down to money, for better or worse.
I'm a social democrat, but it seems to me this runway is ok with better training of the pilots until it can one day be replaced.
There is one thing I don't get: why was the right thrust lever set to full power just before touchdown? I understand adjustement in power can be made during final, but is it a likely scenario that the flying pilot needed all power just before landing?
@sym667 I had trouble understanding that as well, but the Wikipedia article on the crash gives a good explanation of why that was the case. I found it strange that the episode made no attempt to explain why a throttle lever was in takeoff position during a difficult landing like this.
@mejus16 True and unfortunately a mistake claimed the lives of many. Its disturbing how well experienced pilots still make simple mistakes that often lead to disaster. just terrible
How come you say such a thing... blaming the accident on that pilot is just as stupid as ignoring the airport problems, the fdr only says what the acft was doing but not exactly what was going on in that cockpit.. many factor might have contributed for this accident specially levers position, Don't judge what you can't understand it's rude and so freaking unfair with fellow pilots.
What confuses me about this, is why would they let a plane with 1 reverser fly? Especially under rainy circumstances. If I was a pilot, I wouldn't have flown the plane.
@Ichristian96 its true, i wouldn't fly the plane with one reverser, but to big companies, as long as a plane like that can land, rain or shine, money's coming in. Its sad
@Ichristian96 Planes don't need all reversers to operate. In fact, planes MUST be able to stop under full-breaking ONLY situations, to comply with air safety standards. The A380 — for example — isn't equipped with reversers on all four of its engines. Only the two inboard engines of the A380 are equipped with reversers. The A380 has powerful brakes that can slow the aircraft without needing reversers on all four engines.
Considering that they can't get the runway's reputation out of pilot's heads, maybe they should build a new airport on Sao Paulo's outskirts and make the original a small aircraft only airport.
His hand is RIGHT NEAR the other thrust lever when he takes engine to reverse. He didn't feel the other half of the set of levers at full? Ridiculous. Even when you don't notice a decrease in performance and the computer is yelling "retard", you wouldn't think to look at the throttles? I can't believe pilots make these stupid mistakes....We also have pilots who can't even recover from a basic stall, flying our planes. Flying? Thanks, but no thanks. This is really a remedial crew.
It is unbelievable some of the idiotic mistakes that pilots make. Not idling an engine on landing, seriously WTF???? Also when the landing is not happening, err hello, TOGA!
Utterly stupid accident ... i cant believe it.... hoow can you forget to idle the throttlels... thats what you do way before engaging reverse thrust anyway.... the conclusion sucks... I thought that he positioned both throttles to reverse, that would have sent the right engine spooling up but without the revers thrust door open... I dont know, its just a really ill mistake that cos the lives of hundreds ...shame really.
the conclusion is speculative. It's just as plausible that he knew how bad the runway was and left it at full power in case he had to abort landing if the first attempt didn't take. In which case he'd have to take off again, in a short distance. He probably forgot he left it there during the intense events that followed.
It IS the pilot's fault, but I can't blame him for the actions he made. He was in a tough spot and did the best he could. THE problem was that there was no room for error on that runway, so when the pilot made one.........
35L..35L..
pridefalcon 3 months ago
Sao Paul need to do what Hong Kong did, simple as that!!!
Hong Kong had the same problem
nocluewhere 3 months ago
What is not adequately explained in the video is why the old procedure was considered by the pilots to be more effective at reducing landing distance.
Whether you pull both the levers to idle and then continue with either one or both of them what's the difference in engine performance?
Only explanation I can think of is that the pilot would be able to engage full reverse throttle faster by pulling on only one lever rather than two but then again is this an exercise in strength?
christosswc 4 months ago
The people that express disbelief at experienced pilots making such a basic mistake have obviously never studied human factors. As a pilot there is an optimal level of stress at which your performance is also optimal - anything above or below this will cause your performance to deteriorate. Experience is valuable in that it reduces the likelihood of a situation being stressful for an individual however if they do become overly stressed then their performance is liable to falter regardless.
bravobravo74 4 months ago
The echo is funny... "I've got concentrate....concentrate....concentrate....I've got concentrate....concentrate....concentrate.... Hello....... echo...... Now batting....."
CPRailRTC 5 months ago
This accident still doesn't make any sense. Why would ANY aircraft have their engines running at full-power during final approach and landing??? I guess TO/GA never occurred to a group of "experienced" pilots. Grant it, we'll never know how the brain processes logic when put in a serious situation like that, but I don't understand how the pilots continued to try and stop an already compromised aircraft with one reverser operating, on a short runway... instead of executing a go-around.
Neno8403 5 months ago
I refuse to believe that two highly experience "Captains" flying together would make such basic mistake, that even private pilots would know how to avoid!! That investigation isn't right!! something is really fishy about it...
betasso1000 5 months ago
@betasso1000 Like what exactly? ..They choked, could happen to anybody
davidrubiomartin 3 months ago
@davidrubiomartin I understand what you're saying, but imagine yourself falling from a tall building... wouldn't you be desperate seeing death in front of you, but at the same time, wouldn't you try to grab on to something? anything at all? On landings pilots are trained to keep their hands on the throttles @night or day... see what I'm saying?
betasso1000 3 months ago
@betasso1000 It doesn't matter how experienced the crew is. The plain simple fact is they are still human and mistakes are always a possibility. Check out the "Panic over the Pacific" episode. No stressful landing situation there. A simple engine out situation and the pilot forgetting to apply left rudder & other crew mistakes led to that crazy situation. If they hadn't come out of cloud cover when they did, they most likely would of crashed and i doubt they would of been able to figure out why.
mako88sb 3 months ago
@mako88sb All I want to tell you is: Don't believe everything you hear or see on tv...
betasso1000 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why were both engines at full power during the final approach??
Why not go around?
sqy391 5 months ago
txs for the new series uploads-sub!
MrsGxoxo 5 months ago
4:28 for crash
3838jr 5 months ago
Why was the thrustlever in TO mode during landing?!
PhilipDK5800 5 months ago
Its not so much the runways fault as it is the pilots that land on it.
I don't see them shutting it down in rainy or wet weather anytime soon, it's the safest thing but can the airport make a profit like that? In the end it all comes down to money, for better or worse.
I'm a social democrat, but it seems to me this runway is ok with better training of the pilots until it can one day be replaced.
KangaKucha 5 months ago
There is one thing I don't get: why was the right thrust lever set to full power just before touchdown? I understand adjustement in power can be made during final, but is it a likely scenario that the flying pilot needed all power just before landing?
sym667 6 months ago
@sym667 I had trouble understanding that as well, but the Wikipedia article on the crash gives a good explanation of why that was the case. I found it strange that the episode made no attempt to explain why a throttle lever was in takeoff position during a difficult landing like this.
mangobanan 5 months ago
First time ive heard an American pronounce "lever" the British way, well done lol
7byseven 6 months ago in playlist mix
@7byseven: I believe the narrator was a Canadian.
theWall0719 5 months ago
we all human being... we make mistakesss
mejus16 6 months ago
@mejus16 True and unfortunately a mistake claimed the lives of many. Its disturbing how well experienced pilots still make simple mistakes that often lead to disaster. just terrible
brille2363 6 months ago
Strange that even though the pilot realized that the plane was speeding up he didn't check the lever position.
magellanmax 6 months ago 3
@magellanmax Maybe he thought it was a combination of aquaplaning and a strong side wind.
7byseven 6 months ago in playlist mix
This has been flagged as spam show
How come you say such a thing... blaming the accident on that pilot is just as stupid as ignoring the airport problems, the fdr only says what the acft was doing but not exactly what was going on in that cockpit.. many factor might have contributed for this accident specially levers position, Don't judge what you can't understand it's rude and so freaking unfair with fellow pilots.
Patrickpk3 6 months ago
Comment removed
Patrickpk3 6 months ago
Thank you so much for uplaoding these. I totally cannot watch em on their website :s
bluelabelogy 6 months ago
What confuses me about this, is why would they let a plane with 1 reverser fly? Especially under rainy circumstances. If I was a pilot, I wouldn't have flown the plane.
Ichristian96 6 months ago in playlist More videos from JDD6214
@Ichristian96 its true, i wouldn't fly the plane with one reverser, but to big companies, as long as a plane like that can land, rain or shine, money's coming in. Its sad
xXdenee 6 months ago in playlist today
Comment removed
brille2363 6 months ago
@Ichristian96 Planes don't need all reversers to operate. In fact, planes MUST be able to stop under full-breaking ONLY situations, to comply with air safety standards. The A380 — for example — isn't equipped with reversers on all four of its engines. Only the two inboard engines of the A380 are equipped with reversers. The A380 has powerful brakes that can slow the aircraft without needing reversers on all four engines.
Neno8403 5 months ago
Considering that they can't get the runway's reputation out of pilot's heads, maybe they should build a new airport on Sao Paulo's outskirts and make the original a small aircraft only airport.
Naylte 6 months ago 19
@Naylte its a good idea, and its one many would suggest, but you gotta remember Brazil is one crowded country, with a lot of geological landmarks
xXdenee 6 months ago in playlist today
@Naylte Great Idea!
DatMexicano57 6 months ago
@Naylte Hopefully in time they will when they have the money to spend, assuming that it doesn't end up into the pockets of corrupt officials.
and that's not on Brazil alone, many places are like that, too many...
KangaKucha 5 months ago
@Naylte welcome to guarulhos international airport or viracopos airport.
rafazwii 2 months ago
Does someone know why the "old" procedure would have stopped the aircraft more quickly?
gastarbieter 6 months ago
Troubled AirManship. Get it?
oilersman95 6 months ago
His hand is RIGHT NEAR the other thrust lever when he takes engine to reverse. He didn't feel the other half of the set of levers at full? Ridiculous. Even when you don't notice a decrease in performance and the computer is yelling "retard", you wouldn't think to look at the throttles? I can't believe pilots make these stupid mistakes....We also have pilots who can't even recover from a basic stall, flying our planes. Flying? Thanks, but no thanks. This is really a remedial crew.
whoohaaXL 6 months ago
The problem remains... Congonhas Airport is an island in the buildings ocean. A new airport must be made in São Paulo, urgently.
gldwonder 6 months ago
It is unbelievable some of the idiotic mistakes that pilots make. Not idling an engine on landing, seriously WTF???? Also when the landing is not happening, err hello, TOGA!
emelianenkoo 6 months ago
@pete5668 or at least have a sticker that glows or something
Aeromexico682 6 months ago
Its tough when a machine is yelling RETARD at you, damn plane needs some manners
acenace24 6 months ago 25
@acenace24
lol
737boeing8 6 months ago
Thank You :)
lucascristofolini 6 months ago
Should've never happened...
chibikawaiichris 6 months ago
Utterly stupid accident ... i cant believe it.... hoow can you forget to idle the throttlels... thats what you do way before engaging reverse thrust anyway.... the conclusion sucks... I thought that he positioned both throttles to reverse, that would have sent the right engine spooling up but without the revers thrust door open... I dont know, its just a really ill mistake that cos the lives of hundreds ...shame really.
Iamfukenripped 6 months ago
why there isn't a warning for when the thrust is at full power on the runway? i'm sure the plane's computer is aware that the plane has landed.
platinumsalamander 6 months ago
@platinumsalamander Stupid AirBus :) You are right. There must be some safety features like warning pilots about the engine
oisilener1982 6 months ago
the conclusion is speculative. It's just as plausible that he knew how bad the runway was and left it at full power in case he had to abort landing if the first attempt didn't take. In which case he'd have to take off again, in a short distance. He probably forgot he left it there during the intense events that followed.
GregMHouse 6 months ago
Lt. Diaz is HOT!!!!
TheBaconisbetter 6 months ago
It IS the pilot's fault, but I can't blame him for the actions he made. He was in a tough spot and did the best he could. THE problem was that there was no room for error on that runway, so when the pilot made one.........
Darthbelal 6 months ago
they should make the handles on the thrust levers glow in the dark.
pete5668 6 months ago 3
Nice job posting this but why were Parts 3 and 4 deleted? Will you reupload them?
ss04to06 6 months ago 2
@ss04to06
reuploaded with fixed sound
JDD6214 6 months ago 4
TAM .has a troubled history
RealUFOs2009 6 months ago
thanks for posting. But maybe fix the sound on parts 3 & 4 at some point.
bucinaus 6 months ago