seemed to take a really long time to get from 260 to 275 there. Thats odd. I have not pushed mine too hard but I think that at the top end it should get from 260 to 280 faster. However ... you were out in traffic .. that makes it really hard to do. On a track I am sure it would all be different.
@InStyleDK When was that? They've been making them in Australia for over 20 years, where have you been? I can pick up a 35k Oz Ford stock and pull a mid 12 quarter mile. Don't believe me just have a look on youtube for fpv typhoons. My point was that for being so expensive and being called a performance car, these Porsches aren't that quick, they are a lovely car but heavily over priced.
@EweTubee In terms of a drag race and top speed, it is well-known that Porsches get out performed by many other cars. If you are looking at a Porsche for top speed, you are looking at it for the wrong purpose. Porsche's are track cars, they are extremely well balanced and are very quick through corners. Their steering ratio's are absolutely perfect. This is why the GT2 RS holds a 7:18 lap time on the Nurburgring and why Porsche's have often out peformed Ferrari's and Lamborghini's.
5 secs for 0-100 not many cars and by the way even tho i love bmw's there is no quote such as m3 looks much faster either u are under 15 or a girl but girls like porsches so you are underaged for driving sir..
wow .. redline shifting! That would scare the hell out of me. I tend to shift before 4000rpm and often when driving on the highway and around town I shift at 2500. I see that you are getting 15.5 litres per 100 km and that is awesome given the performance. I personally think that the Porsche brandname gives you the best performance for the efficiency with all the safety, BOSE stereo and air conditioning. Really, you can not go wrong with a Porsche. The Michelin Pilot tires will cost you however!
@W4TCH4W HAHAH Ford has one of the most reliable engines in the world. The straight 6 Ford engine can clock millions of KM's without needing to be opened. Let's see how many Porsches do that. It's pathetic that Porches cost that much but my 15k Ford would demolish it. And the way a car looks is a matter of opinion, and in my opinion Porsches all look the same, that same old boring shape. I was just pointing out that this "performance" car is sub par in the performance element.
@24Slexani@24Slexani@24Slexani it looked like 5 seconds to me lol. i know officially the 2007 cayman is meant to do 0-60 in 5.1s. the 2010 cayman s does it in 4.9s with PDK. Check it out for yourself; go to Google, type in Diseno-art (car spec website) and find Porsche from the sports car menu at the top.
@24Slexani The Cayman S does it in 4.9 with the PDK double clutch and the Cayman R does it in 4.6 with the PDK ... it all depends on road conditions and all that jazz ... but just remember this ... the Cayman S weighs about 3,000 lbs. with the PDK transmission and the Cayman R just about 2,900 lbs. with the PDK ... the 2010 M5 weighs upwards of 4,000 lbs. ... power to weight ratio is very important in a car.
@xxMaKaVeLLixx Oh and if you have all those options like the sport and sport plus with the launch control then it's possible for the Cayman to be that fast ... and Porsche is talking about 0- 60 times from a stand still on a closed course and all that ... this guy was just driving to the top speed and he isn't a professional race car drive so I'm sure the time can be off by a few tenths of a second or so ... it all depends like I've said before.
yes @aintnopity - I wish I could too ! but its more the wear n tear, what if you could go along the autobahn at 150mph but the engine was only ticking over at about 3k rpm instead of nearer six - I love thrashing by cayman to the red line - theres a second sort of kick after about 5k, noise gets madder and it gets going even more, wonderful,,...
i have a cayman S, havent had it that fast (live in UK!) only 135mph or so. mines a manual and I think the sixth gear is a bit too short , you can take it at about 35-40 mph giving you less that 2K revs when crusing about. think it short be much longer, like an overdrive gear so when at motorway speeds (or top speed) the engine is working less hard, less wear n tear and better fuel consumption.....
@Brewskies24 you can read that the average consumption for 180km went up from 14.8 to 15.6 in like a minute.. must be quite a lot. but then again it was still accelerating.
alejandron1984 Go figure you have a jetta. Guys like you are always justifying reasons NOT to own a porsche. Youll never Know how sweet it can be. Step up to the plate. And your best idea is to buy a motor cycle? really? go on with your practical life ZZZzzzzzz
Eh, for me a car is more of a practicality thing. I drive a jetta TDI, not a fast car by any means, but i can drive all week on a tank of fuel. A a car to go fast is just rediculous. Sure your heart races...for a minute. then you have to slow down because of fear of cops or w/e. You want to go fast? buy a motorcycle.. You can go faster, accelerate faster. And stay faster. Cops dont fuck with you cause they cant catch you. And where money leeches go for nice cars, every girl likes a bike
@Syrus231 No matter how fast you think your bike is, it cannot out run a radio. To think cops won't pull you over is as ludicrous as thinking you can sustain 160 mph plus on a two wheeled death machine that can loose control with a strong gust of wind.
i would buy one of these as a second vehicle if i could... i just can't seem to justify to myself the impracticality. so i have a merc instead, e550 coupe, which does 0-60 quite a bit quicker anyway and has so much to offer. :) and btw, you don't buy a car to get ladies to like you. that's ridiculous.
i saw one on the motorway the other day doing 80mph. i had to laugh at the biddy little pop up spoiler. haha. you got your 'spoiler' up there ? chumpass.
No need to be envious bud, just cause you don't drive one. Yes, it does come up above 70 because it helps stability and aerodynamics. What do you drive that makes you, um, not a chumpass?
i could seriously afford one of these in cash, but its not something that appeals to me. i once had quite a powerful bmw and tbh, i felt like a right twat. i had it for less than a year. im into practicality and reality. 70mph is the limit. as i grow mature, i realise pop up spoilers, bucket seats and the like are not only unnecessary, but they tend to reflect an inadequacy of some content for the occupants. i just think the times have changed and what was once admiration is now often ridicule.
you will have to learn the hard way that 'you' dont pull the chicks, the car and promise of money does. to me thats not chicks. thats future problems and money grabbers. if you cant get laid for who you are, your just a male prostitute. lose the job, lose the porsche. lose the lady....better to be incognito.
@ianupton i could note be more agree and if ppl think they look better in a expensive car they will only look better for empty ppl just like them goldigger bitches for example and you dont want her to take care f your kids
I have to say this doesn't seem that fast to me. I ride a Honda CB500 which is by no means a fast bike (0-100kmh 4.5s, quarter mile in 13.5s) and I'm sure it's considerably quicker acceleration than this. Yet a Cayman S or similar is definitely a car I wouldn't mess with on the road...I just expected the speedo to move faster. Maybe it's just an illusion because the gradations are 50kmh, quite wide...
You're right, it's actually much quicker than my bike, at least over 100kmh. 0-100 is about the same but this gets to 150 in about 9 s whereas the CB500 is about 11 or 12. Like I said, I wouldn't try and mess with one of these if I saw one (not that I 'mess' with cars that often anyway...)
I agree! I drove a Boxster 2.7 with tiptronic for a week and I think it ruins the whole car. It felt slower than the first Boxter 2.5 with 204cv...but its very good for city driving :)
You probly drive a civic and your bashing this to make yourself feel better. Caymans and boxters are built to be affordable. It's acceleration is exactly how it should be for its power to weight ratio, if you want fastser you choose one of the 15 versions of the 911.
On the Cayman S dashboard the speed limit is 300 km/h, on the base model 280 km/h. That's the way to know what model is. And yes you can get the dashboard in black for an S. You can get black, white, red and yellow.
Das ist kein Cayman S, sondern ein normaler Cayman. Erstens sieht man das an den schwarzen Tachoblättern und am shice 5 Gang Getriebe. Der S ist viel besser übersetzt und hat mehr bums. Ich fahr einen, ich muss es wissen. :))
".... so much aerodynamic downforce they would EASILY be able to reach 250 mph (402 kph)"
Not true!! Downforce is there you make sure the car is stabile. And an stabile car can drive faster. A car with no downforce will simpley fly of the road, like a small airplane. A car with no downforce don´t have grip, and with no grip, you cant get speed. The two things go together.
No one can drive 250 mph without downforce, to keep the car stabile and maintain grip.
not necessarily. In a straight line, one car with tons of down force cannot travel as fast as the same car with less down force. In certain situations, down force can limit a car's speed because of the extra load and "weight" it creates.
So! A drag racer would go faster without the huge wing on the back?? No really my friend... see my point(?)
It´s just not true, filiphilopeno! A fast car needs downforce, to make it stable, thats a simple fact!
Take a look at the famus clip from Le Mans years ago. Where a racecar, going straigt ahead, dont have 100 % downforce, with 340 km/h. It´s takes off and spind in the air like at plane with no wings...
you both make good points...911claus downforce DOES limit top speed of a car. However you are right in the sense that if a car had none of it, it would fly off the road. Drag cars of course need it for stability and grip. However they do short distance runs and top speed isn't their goal...it is acceleration. Achieving traction to those massive rear wheels greatly helps with acceleration, thus the need for those large rear spoilers.
Thats not true... rear wing helps with downforce on the back, forcing the front up, therefore you have a front splitter to have downforce on the front.
and you're wrong on the Le Mans... the mercedes didnt flip because of a not 100% downforce. It flipped because it hit a bump and air was caught under it pushing it up... you have to remember the underside of those cars are like a wing from an airplane
So what you say is; downforce is everything ;-) Thank you for that! Only one car, my friend, does not need downforce. A rocket with wheels! But thats not what we are talking about here. Real cars, with real people and real driveing skills needs downforce when speed goes past 200 mph. plus.
One thing about the Mercedes accident, they - Mercedes, was the only one the blame a hump. Everybody else said downforce problems was the main cause!
Fast cars needs downforce. Every pro driver knows thay
when you are going at those kinds of speeds you need an exponential amount of horsepower to move past the aero drag. Also Gearing plays a huge part in top speed
The aerodynamics don't let the car increase the speed. Every slit and vent you see is the GT-R help with downforce drag. With downforce drag, you lower the top speed. If the F1 cars didn't have so much aerodynamic downforce they would EASILY be able to reach 250 mph (402 kph).
Point is, the GT-R was made to be a track car so it has a lot of downforce to help in corners. As a result it lowers its top speed.
Dude i can totally attest to how kickass of a car this is. I just got back from work and had to work on one of these today (New tires and an alignment) When i road tested this car I could not believe how amazing it drove. I thought it'd be as shitty of a feel as a Boxter, but what a ride.
u kno the cayman an the boxster are the most affordable porsches now, if u had good credit but if u want the cayman big brother u better have sum cold hard cash
But I mean why would you compare two completely different classes of cars. If you were to compare two suv's or something, sure go ahead, but one sports car and the other an SUV... i mean to me if just is useless to do so, but hey if it makes you smile at night, go for it...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
porsche is an overpriced crap, I'd rather have a lexus. people will say lexus is crap because it's not made by white people. But if Lexus was told to be made by the Germans, you guys would be comparing it with the BMWs.
I was bored & don't know what to do, so I wrote "Daewoo Matiz" in the search bar & I ended up with this video... Really weird... Anywayz, really nice run :-)
I agree that V8 engine doesn't fit in sports car. Maybe that is the reason why porsche uses it in Cayenne. Some american car enthusiastics may disagree, but I (we?) don't care. :)
Well, Cayman isn't really a sport car and I think it's not meant to. But I like the sound and the way Porsche uses boxer engine.
Me too. These guys are arguing ignorance against stupidity; may the best man win? I also learned, from these two, that V8's don't work in 'sport cars.' I guess I'll have to go back in time and reorganize GT racing to exclude V8's for the last, oh, 45 years or so...and that's just to start. We'll get those V8's outta sport cars! Damn straight!
Have you ever even heard a boxer engine in real life!?!?!? You are saying all the 911's and boxers sound worse than V6s!?!?!? are you on fucking crack!?!? Go back to playing your "tuner" racing games asshole and stay off of youtube troll
rockinroland: I think you replied to the wrong guy. I said no such thing. I have an '07Cayman S--and it's not a video game; it's in my garage right now. I was commenting on the guy saying V8's don't work in sports cars.
seemed to take a really long time to get from 260 to 275 there. Thats odd. I have not pushed mine too hard but I think that at the top end it should get from 260 to 280 faster. However ... you were out in traffic .. that makes it really hard to do. On a track I am sure it would all be different.
lastmiles 3 months ago
...and this is probably the slowest Porsche sports car around
BfmvOwnz1 5 months ago
imagine what if its going to be funny the driver and the camera end up in and accedent LOL
barbarshater 5 months ago
Ford.... Or Porsche, same? Dont think so. And by the way, a straight six Ford engine? When was that?
InStyleDK 6 months ago
@InStyleDK When was that? They've been making them in Australia for over 20 years, where have you been? I can pick up a 35k Oz Ford stock and pull a mid 12 quarter mile. Don't believe me just have a look on youtube for fpv typhoons. My point was that for being so expensive and being called a performance car, these Porsches aren't that quick, they are a lovely car but heavily over priced.
EweTubee 6 months ago
@EweTubee In terms of a drag race and top speed, it is well-known that Porsches get out performed by many other cars. If you are looking at a Porsche for top speed, you are looking at it for the wrong purpose. Porsche's are track cars, they are extremely well balanced and are very quick through corners. Their steering ratio's are absolutely perfect. This is why the GT2 RS holds a 7:18 lap time on the Nurburgring and why Porsche's have often out peformed Ferrari's and Lamborghini's.
ansark11 6 months ago 7
@ansark11 That's a good point, they are an excellent track car, you are correct.
EweTubee 5 months ago
5 secs for 0-100 not many cars and by the way even tho i love bmw's there is no quote such as m3 looks much faster either u are under 15 or a girl but girls like porsches so you are underaged for driving sir..
W4TCH4W 6 months ago
i would rather buy evo 8.
afifiafifi1 6 months ago
Oh dear god he was flashing the high beam to someone in front of him while driving at 275 km/h !!!!
nullhypothesis74 7 months ago
wow .. redline shifting! That would scare the hell out of me. I tend to shift before 4000rpm and often when driving on the highway and around town I shift at 2500. I see that you are getting 15.5 litres per 100 km and that is awesome given the performance. I personally think that the Porsche brandname gives you the best performance for the efficiency with all the safety, BOSE stereo and air conditioning. Really, you can not go wrong with a Porsche. The Michelin Pilot tires will cost you however!
lastmiles 7 months ago
i thought this would be faster.... the bmw m3 looks much faster!
Inbreed6699FAMILY 8 months ago
for a porsche that 0-100 is shocking, a 30,000k Ford that weighs 2 tonnes does it in 5 and a bit.
EweTubee 8 months ago
@EweTubee ya but nobody tends to stare at that car and by the way that fords interior is shit as well as its unreliable engine
W4TCH4W 6 months ago
@W4TCH4W HAHAH Ford has one of the most reliable engines in the world. The straight 6 Ford engine can clock millions of KM's without needing to be opened. Let's see how many Porsches do that. It's pathetic that Porches cost that much but my 15k Ford would demolish it. And the way a car looks is a matter of opinion, and in my opinion Porsches all look the same, that same old boring shape. I was just pointing out that this "performance" car is sub par in the performance element.
EweTubee 6 months ago
@EweTubee i agree ford is great but i love the look of the porches
xXBMXSAINTXx 6 months ago
no llego a los 280 fome el videooo..
stbnjmnz 8 months ago
<3 german Autobahn
FDPictures 9 months ago
du hast mal eben auf 180km den Durchschnitt von 14.7 auf 15.6 Liter gehoben :D
ez45 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This car is very expensive. See what happened in Japan. There are many people, who need our help. Dont waste this money
Zollenau 10 months ago
Great performance but imagine hitting a tree at this speed.
nielsboex 11 months ago
@nielsboex "but imagine hitting a tree at this speed." That was completely random.
Iamborghini 11 months ago
@nielsboex
heh :)
bamboali 11 months ago
@nielsboex the guy was probrably german in a german car on the german autobahn...we won't be hitting a tree anytime soon...
0summsumm 7 months ago
6 secs .. till it hit 60mph not bad at all
24Slexani 11 months ago
@24Slexani its 5.2
UchihaNawaf 11 months ago
@24Slexani more like just under 5
foxhounduk2k8 10 months ago
@foxhounduk2k8 mate a m5 v10 does 60mph in 4.5 don't tell me this does it in under 5 thats just plain bullshit
24Slexani 10 months ago
@24Slexani @24Slexani @24Slexani it looked like 5 seconds to me lol. i know officially the 2007 cayman is meant to do 0-60 in 5.1s. the 2010 cayman s does it in 4.9s with PDK. Check it out for yourself; go to Google, type in Diseno-art (car spec website) and find Porsche from the sports car menu at the top.
take care
foxhounduk2k8 10 months ago 3
@24Slexani The Cayman S does it in 4.9 with the PDK double clutch and the Cayman R does it in 4.6 with the PDK ... it all depends on road conditions and all that jazz ... but just remember this ... the Cayman S weighs about 3,000 lbs. with the PDK transmission and the Cayman R just about 2,900 lbs. with the PDK ... the 2010 M5 weighs upwards of 4,000 lbs. ... power to weight ratio is very important in a car.
xxMaKaVeLLixx 10 months ago
@xxMaKaVeLLixx Oh and if you have all those options like the sport and sport plus with the launch control then it's possible for the Cayman to be that fast ... and Porsche is talking about 0- 60 times from a stand still on a closed course and all that ... this guy was just driving to the top speed and he isn't a professional race car drive so I'm sure the time can be off by a few tenths of a second or so ... it all depends like I've said before.
xxMaKaVeLLixx 10 months ago
all thats left is some tuning to the engine and it will be a better car to drive than a normal 911 :P
patrickkroell 1 year ago
I love how the engine revs up to like 2500 before the car starts moving.
Heavy ass fucking machine :P
lmcneice 1 year ago
yes @aintnopity - I wish I could too ! but its more the wear n tear, what if you could go along the autobahn at 150mph but the engine was only ticking over at about 3k rpm instead of nearer six - I love thrashing by cayman to the red line - theres a second sort of kick after about 5k, noise gets madder and it gets going even more, wonderful,,...
timelinetwist 1 year ago
5kms in 80 seconds.
Xtefanno 1 year ago
6925 km? and u r doing that? do u want to trash the engine?
MrDuce96 1 year ago
@MrDuce96 it was designed for it .. no really it was. Mobil 1 synthetic oil and top fuel and let it rip.
lastmiles 1 year ago
it's a very good rival for the nissan gtr...my opinion..:D
pitbuldoinciupi 1 year ago
@pitbuldoinciupi are you crazy? the nissan gtr have as rival the porsche 911 turbo
renal76littlediddy 1 year ago
@renal76littlediddy ...it possible..after 280..the gtr..is very slowly..it takes about 18 sec from 280 to 300
pitbuldoinciupi 1 year ago
@pitbuldoinciupi AFTER! but til 280 theres no comparison...
Driftuner 1 year ago
a stage 3 srt does this in 33 seconds...
GrandMasterBison 1 year ago
yawn
IndyRamMan 1 year ago
i have a cayman S, havent had it that fast (live in UK!) only 135mph or so. mines a manual and I think the sixth gear is a bit too short , you can take it at about 35-40 mph giving you less that 2K revs when crusing about. think it short be much longer, like an overdrive gear so when at motorway speeds (or top speed) the engine is working less hard, less wear n tear and better fuel consumption.....
timelinetwist 1 year ago
@timelinetwist yeah but we in germany use the 6th gear for accelaration, not saving fuel
aintnopity 1 year ago
I Kilometri percorsi a 280 Km orari sono 7, in 1.20 minuti...????
pennello123 1 year ago
@pennello123 4.5km al minuto
elmagico1082 1 year ago
Holy shit that climbs so slowly once it goes over 130 mph.
monkeymarine291 1 year ago
wow da hätte ich eher einen 911er vermutet!!!!!!!!!
Naturbursche82 1 year ago
:D und schön gemütlich SWR3 hören!!! GEIL!!!
*****
NotMyDuty 1 year ago
15 l. - 100km , nice :)
jancio2 1 year ago
that is called great acceleraion
52nos 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
0-100 in 6 sec. hahahahahaha. buy a real porsche
andy55055 1 year ago
@andy55055 , ahhh.....no. More like 4.9sec. Buy a real stopwatch.
4MATICbenz 1 year ago
whats the fuel econ ratio under the speed? something/100km?
Brewskies24 1 year ago
@Brewskies24 you can read that the average consumption for 180km went up from 14.8 to 15.6 in like a minute.. must be quite a lot. but then again it was still accelerating.
ez45 1 year ago
German cars are the BEST!! Mostly the Porsche.
Respect for Porsche ^^ and for the driver =)
(from Hungary)
dabura1993 1 year ago
is it auto because i don't see the light that tells you to shift , anyway looks nice as fuck
Oster910 1 year ago
Und nebenher schön SWR3 hören :D
Superhans115 1 year ago
lol 0.54 Lichthupe!!!
Ripperjack86 1 year ago 13
It wasn´t 280...
kedluben 1 year ago
alejandron1984 Go figure you have a jetta. Guys like you are always justifying reasons NOT to own a porsche. Youll never Know how sweet it can be. Step up to the plate. And your best idea is to buy a motor cycle? really? go on with your practical life ZZZzzzzzz
sad1robot 1 year ago
mmmmmm???????????????
alejandron1984 1 year ago
Eh, for me a car is more of a practicality thing. I drive a jetta TDI, not a fast car by any means, but i can drive all week on a tank of fuel. A a car to go fast is just rediculous. Sure your heart races...for a minute. then you have to slow down because of fear of cops or w/e. You want to go fast? buy a motorcycle.. You can go faster, accelerate faster. And stay faster. Cops dont fuck with you cause they cant catch you. And where money leeches go for nice cars, every girl likes a bike
Syrus231 1 year ago
@Syrus231 în Germany we don't have fear of cops because we can drive mostly as fast as we want :)
NotMyDuty 1 year ago
@Syrus231 Hahah... have a transfer to germany and don't be afraid of cops anymore !
Felyxorez 1 year ago
@Syrus231 This is the German Autobahn =) Also, when you crash a cayman, the cayman is totalled, but not you. Not so for a motorcycle.
MrCharming123 1 year ago 2
@Syrus231 No matter how fast you think your bike is, it cannot out run a radio. To think cops won't pull you over is as ludicrous as thinking you can sustain 160 mph plus on a two wheeled death machine that can loose control with a strong gust of wind.
brscth 1 year ago
@brscth
lose control fyi, not loose
1flynlow 1 year ago
i would buy one of these as a second vehicle if i could... i just can't seem to justify to myself the impracticality. so i have a merc instead, e550 coupe, which does 0-60 quite a bit quicker anyway and has so much to offer. :) and btw, you don't buy a car to get ladies to like you. that's ridiculous.
cmcint7 1 year ago
OMG!
Er hört halt SWR3^^
TommyAKiller 1 year ago
I don't pull chicks with my Cayman I pull wheelies! :D
MagicAyrtonforever 1 year ago
i saw one on the motorway the other day doing 80mph. i had to laugh at the biddy little pop up spoiler. haha. you got your 'spoiler' up there ? chumpass.
ianupton 1 year ago
No need to be envious bud, just cause you don't drive one. Yes, it does come up above 70 because it helps stability and aerodynamics. What do you drive that makes you, um, not a chumpass?
audiman25 1 year ago
i could seriously afford one of these in cash, but its not something that appeals to me. i once had quite a powerful bmw and tbh, i felt like a right twat. i had it for less than a year. im into practicality and reality. 70mph is the limit. as i grow mature, i realise pop up spoilers, bucket seats and the like are not only unnecessary, but they tend to reflect an inadequacy of some content for the occupants. i just think the times have changed and what was once admiration is now often ridicule.
ianupton 1 year ago
@ianupton do you pull chicks with that?
fabtellem 1 year ago
you will have to learn the hard way that 'you' dont pull the chicks, the car and promise of money does. to me thats not chicks. thats future problems and money grabbers. if you cant get laid for who you are, your just a male prostitute. lose the job, lose the porsche. lose the lady....better to be incognito.
if you want to live, follow me...
ianupton 1 year ago
@ianupton if you want to reallyy live, push your porsche to 270 kph and you heart rate is at 160 bpm then ull know when your living
fabtellem 1 year ago
@ianupton i could note be more agree and if ppl think they look better in a expensive car they will only look better for empty ppl just like them goldigger bitches for example and you dont want her to take care f your kids
OrryBoy 1 year ago
@ianupton Don't see the problem with bucket seats.....they're all well and good.
corvettels9 1 year ago
So because you think u grew up (in ur opinion) everyone has to think the same way you do?
calisickalicious 1 year ago
And it is the one with the automatic transmission, boring
993turbo 1 year ago
Rocket ship
maxinator39 2 years ago
I have to say this doesn't seem that fast to me. I ride a Honda CB500 which is by no means a fast bike (0-100kmh 4.5s, quarter mile in 13.5s) and I'm sure it's considerably quicker acceleration than this. Yet a Cayman S or similar is definitely a car I wouldn't mess with on the road...I just expected the speedo to move faster. Maybe it's just an illusion because the gradations are 50kmh, quite wide...
joechesshyre 2 years ago
@joechesshyre
For only about 295 HP it is very quick! The speedo does not move quick, because of the small angle.
kavakava1234 2 years ago
@kavakava1234
You're right, it's actually much quicker than my bike, at least over 100kmh. 0-100 is about the same but this gets to 150 in about 9 s whereas the CB500 is about 11 or 12. Like I said, I wouldn't try and mess with one of these if I saw one (not that I 'mess' with cars that often anyway...)
joechesshyre 2 years ago
@joechesshyre that and the speedo covers just 180° of the circle
Dainanashi 1 year ago
@joechesshyre and my comment is way late as is can see...
Dainanashi 1 year ago
Yes, why do Porsche do that? I like to see a speedo needle move quickly!
joechesshyre 1 year ago
@joechesshyre good question. i wondered too. but i guess we'll never get a satisfying answer on this
Dainanashi 1 year ago
yeah it does make it look slow, but then you see that the intervals are 50 km apart, and it's pretty quick when you realize that
esca8652 1 year ago
I agree, for the money I'd expect something a little more exciting than that. My old RX-7 seemed quicker.
m1leswilliams 1 year ago
Well if it was stock it wasn't...Cayman S is pretty quick plus this is a Tip, not as quick as the 6 speed.
audiman25 1 year ago
Nice
Lulespeed 2 years ago
Lichthupe, hehehe
xitec75 2 years ago
SWR3 :D
OfficialKKFchannel 2 years ago 24
the tiptronic ruins the magic of this car! changing gears at the limiter with a manual gearbox is an amazing feeling!
p4nt3li5 2 years ago
I agree! I drove a Boxster 2.7 with tiptronic for a week and I think it ruins the whole car. It felt slower than the first Boxter 2.5 with 204cv...but its very good for city driving :)
sergiopmcerqueira 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I am not afraid to Ride on Porsche Cayman S 0-300 kmh 0-215 mph
china9090o2 2 years ago
300kmh-186mph
maximapitko 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Shit acceleration like for sport car . Nothing special
sohc77 2 years ago
You probly drive a civic and your bashing this to make yourself feel better. Caymans and boxters are built to be affordable. It's acceleration is exactly how it should be for its power to weight ratio, if you want fastser you choose one of the 15 versions of the 911.
UnsurpassedKnowledge 2 years ago 3
0:32 Acceleration Completed
china9090o2 2 years ago
Sick cars, sick speed. Gotta love Porsche
WakeATV 2 years ago 3
SWR3 - Der Porsche ist zuhause!
badensfinest 2 years ago
i had no idea this car could go 175
fugee36 2 years ago 2
you can get black dashboard for every Porsche...just visit the hp
lutscher74 2 years ago
Can you get the dashboard in black for an S? If not he's driving a base model. Either way he's still driving a Cayman and I'm envious.
defears3 2 years ago
On the Cayman S dashboard the speed limit is 300 km/h, on the base model 280 km/h. That's the way to know what model is. And yes you can get the dashboard in black for an S. You can get black, white, red and yellow.
Pyraziel 2 years ago
you can customize the interior in every way possible when you build the car. so yes, it could be the S, or the base.
SVTFjason 2 years ago
THAT 0-60 WAS STUPID FAST WOW
KingFreak07 2 years ago 3
That's because it's in KM/H...
StockDC2 2 years ago
i knew that LOL. it was still kinda fast tho...
KingFreak07 2 years ago
:D
I lol'd
DenHond 2 years ago
@KingFreak07 6-7 seconds? assuming your talking mph really overall a fast car but not stupid fast. stupid fast is a 0-100mph in 3.5 seconds
beammark 10 months ago
that is a nice video
but i think it's a normal cayman, too
hatisimbach 2 years ago
Круто!
WhiteBarackObama 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i lke boobies but i also like penis and chociolkdfas
roadtorupert 2 years ago
absolute stupid and indiscriminate
DerSchoe 2 years ago
Das ist kein Cayman S, sondern ein normaler Cayman. Erstens sieht man das an den schwarzen Tachoblättern und am shice 5 Gang Getriebe. Der S ist viel besser übersetzt und hat mehr bums. Ich fahr einen, ich muss es wissen. :))
GermanBullitt 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Du brüstest Dich damit einen Cayman S zu fahren? Peinlich...
HonkyTonk791 2 years ago
das waren ja gar nich 280 xD
rocksteph84 2 years ago
cool vid
great performance
love it
tomtomfrance 2 years ago 13
6900km engine. Reall eager to go fast!
porschediary 2 years ago
SWR3 xD
2Guys1Site 2 years ago
it need 1 minute and 19 second to get 0-175
olimpic2008gordon 2 years ago
great
mazenbmw 2 years ago
??????
".... so much aerodynamic downforce they would EASILY be able to reach 250 mph (402 kph)"
Not true!! Downforce is there you make sure the car is stabile. And an stabile car can drive faster. A car with no downforce will simpley fly of the road, like a small airplane. A car with no downforce don´t have grip, and with no grip, you cant get speed. The two things go together.
No one can drive 250 mph without downforce, to keep the car stabile and maintain grip.
911claus 2 years ago
not necessarily. In a straight line, one car with tons of down force cannot travel as fast as the same car with less down force. In certain situations, down force can limit a car's speed because of the extra load and "weight" it creates.
filiphilopeno 2 years ago 2
So! A drag racer would go faster without the huge wing on the back?? No really my friend... see my point(?)
It´s just not true, filiphilopeno! A fast car needs downforce, to make it stable, thats a simple fact!
Take a look at the famus clip from Le Mans years ago. Where a racecar, going straigt ahead, dont have 100 % downforce, with 340 km/h. It´s takes off and spind in the air like at plane with no wings...
Downforce is everything.
911claus 2 years ago
you both make good points...911claus downforce DOES limit top speed of a car. However you are right in the sense that if a car had none of it, it would fly off the road. Drag cars of course need it for stability and grip. However they do short distance runs and top speed isn't their goal...it is acceleration. Achieving traction to those massive rear wheels greatly helps with acceleration, thus the need for those large rear spoilers.
audib6turbo 2 years ago
It does limit the top speed. Correct! But as you wrote; you NEED downforce in a fast car! Othervise you are gone....
I´m talking about real racecars, not drag cars or similar!
911claus 2 years ago
Thats not true... rear wing helps with downforce on the back, forcing the front up, therefore you have a front splitter to have downforce on the front.
and you're wrong on the Le Mans... the mercedes didnt flip because of a not 100% downforce. It flipped because it hit a bump and air was caught under it pushing it up... you have to remember the underside of those cars are like a wing from an airplane
ApachyDaro 2 years ago
So what you say is; downforce is everything ;-) Thank you for that! Only one car, my friend, does not need downforce. A rocket with wheels! But thats not what we are talking about here. Real cars, with real people and real driveing skills needs downforce when speed goes past 200 mph. plus.
One thing about the Mercedes accident, they - Mercedes, was the only one the blame a hump. Everybody else said downforce problems was the main cause!
Fast cars needs downforce. Every pro driver knows thay
911claus 2 years ago
when you are going at those kinds of speeds you need an exponential amount of horsepower to move past the aero drag. Also Gearing plays a huge part in top speed
nmac121 2 years ago
Fast, but i was expecting more from 295bhp :)
duxter 2 years ago
How could you when the 200bhp more powerful GT-R only does 15mph more?
sno9r 2 years ago
The aerodynamics don't let the car increase the speed. Every slit and vent you see is the GT-R help with downforce drag. With downforce drag, you lower the top speed. If the F1 cars didn't have so much aerodynamic downforce they would EASILY be able to reach 250 mph (402 kph).
Point is, the GT-R was made to be a track car so it has a lot of downforce to help in corners. As a result it lowers its top speed.
c0nv1ct1337 2 years ago
haha, no shit dude!
I though downforce gave the car higher top speed! :D
jeez..
sno9r 2 years ago
my commodore does 220km/h after that i dont know the speedo ends there
mudkrab 2 years ago
A GTR is the same price as this Cayman S after you package them identically.
utahgs 2 years ago
Comment removed
KerryGetz1122 2 years ago
porsche ... the best
peixaodoidao 2 years ago
1.02
You where flashing your headlights as in "get the fuck away from my lane!!". Lol :p
fedorkleber 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
una mierda por favor
deivo4 2 years ago
Dude i can totally attest to how kickass of a car this is. I just got back from work and had to work on one of these today (New tires and an alignment) When i road tested this car I could not believe how amazing it drove. I thought it'd be as shitty of a feel as a Boxter, but what a ride.
AinSophAur31 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
cool fast car but were are cops??
aimllos 2 years ago
in german autobahn you can drive as fast as you want...cops fuck.
umbertino6 2 years ago
ok i not remember that
aimllos 2 years ago
its fast
faza127 2 years ago 9
THE GEARBOX IS MUCH BETTER IN THE 911
deivo4 3 years ago
Comment removed
MetalicB0x 3 years ago
1) it's tiptronic
2) your caps lock is on
3) you're an idiot
MetalicB0x 3 years ago
u kno the cayman an the boxster are the most affordable porsches now, if u had good credit but if u want the cayman big brother u better have sum cold hard cash
sexyboi142 3 years ago
natürlich is das ein porsche, das erkennt man am amaturenbrett
HurzMurz 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thats no Porsche , it´s only a fucking bad fake !!!!!
Ashen1999 3 years ago
omg this cars fuel economie is rly good. at vmax, it does 15.5L/100km!!! thats better then my suv :S
f1andrew 3 years ago
Yeah, but that car is runnin on maximum power^^
Wichswurscht 3 years ago
did you just compare a porsche to an suv? hmm, dont ever compare fuel economy with such a huge difference in vehicles, that is just weird...
Smrtovija33 3 years ago
vmax on a cayman and normal city driving on a suv... save consumption is actually comparable ifu think bout it a lil harder
f1andrew 3 years ago
But I mean why would you compare two completely different classes of cars. If you were to compare two suv's or something, sure go ahead, but one sports car and the other an SUV... i mean to me if just is useless to do so, but hey if it makes you smile at night, go for it...
Smrtovija33 3 years ago
Good video.
workshop77777 3 years ago
great cars,love them.
they nearly keep up with my Renault megane lol
jaybyme 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
porsche is an overpriced crap, I'd rather have a lexus. people will say lexus is crap because it's not made by white people. But if Lexus was told to be made by the Germans, you guys would be comparing it with the BMWs.
kelloggcerealxoxo 3 years ago
lexus ??? thats the most overpriced cars
a new ls 460 cost 90.000 €
a new Bmw 740i 80.000 €, and the lexus is full with plastic, 7er is high quality
Frauenarztrules 3 years ago 5
cooler radiosender =)
Atzefu 3 years ago
wirklich cooles gerät
Frauenarztrules 3 years ago
I was bored & don't know what to do, so I wrote "Daewoo Matiz" in the search bar & I ended up with this video... Really weird... Anywayz, really nice run :-)
camrygrande 3 years ago
Comment removed
Matt54e 3 years ago
ahahahah lol
alessiopt83 3 years ago
moron))
iscander0000 3 years ago
hey that's funny cuz porsche's were never made with V6's.
haha, i like uneducated pigheaded people that spam up youtube
liltimmy1313 3 years ago 2
Comment removed
Matt54e 3 years ago
One likes boxer, another prefers V6. Porsche makes V8 so why not choose that instead of V6?
kb7199 3 years ago
Comment removed
Matt54e 3 years ago
I agree that V8 engine doesn't fit in sports car. Maybe that is the reason why porsche uses it in Cayenne. Some american car enthusiastics may disagree, but I (we?) don't care. :)
Well, Cayman isn't really a sport car and I think it's not meant to. But I like the sound and the way Porsche uses boxer engine.
kb7199 3 years ago
Me too. These guys are arguing ignorance against stupidity; may the best man win? I also learned, from these two, that V8's don't work in 'sport cars.' I guess I'll have to go back in time and reorganize GT racing to exclude V8's for the last, oh, 45 years or so...and that's just to start. We'll get those V8's outta sport cars! Damn straight!
volumeguy 3 years ago
Have you ever even heard a boxer engine in real life!?!?!? You are saying all the 911's and boxers sound worse than V6s!?!?!? are you on fucking crack!?!? Go back to playing your "tuner" racing games asshole and stay off of youtube troll
rockinroland08 3 years ago 2
rockinroland: I think you replied to the wrong guy. I said no such thing. I have an '07Cayman S--and it's not a video game; it's in my garage right now. I was commenting on the guy saying V8's don't work in sports cars.
volumeguy 3 years ago