Hi, I am building my first reactor just now, & came across your video, I must admit copper had crossed my mind too as it can be bolted & not welded cheaper too, but you give me food for thought here, good videos guy, very interesting & well put together.
A friend I are trying to build a geet out of a 6.5 Onan genset. If there is a knowlageable geet builder in Washington state (Seattle area) that would like to mentor us, please contact me, BradLee, at (206) 854-1016. Thanks.
After making the vapours more dry going into the twin reactors, and added vapours of water with electrolyte, I was able to develop magnetic signatures on the reactor rods. The exhaust is not completely oderless but I can't get the engine to make any smoke regardless of how rich or lean I make the fresh air to reactor gases ratio so maybe a copper inner tube can work.
But I do not see any signs that it is any more efficient than using a ferromagnetic inner tube as recommended by Paul Pantone.
I don't know. I haven't taken measurements. I want to get a cracking reaction first. It seems to only vapourize the fuel when using copper instead of a ferromagnetic inner tube. Right now it requires a lot more fresh air to run. On a previous reactor with a steel inner tube I could have the fresh closed off almost completely and it still ran strong. I think that is a good test of if it is actually cracking, there is oxygen in the cracked gases so it doesn't need much fresh air to burn well.
I should clarify, most fuel reformers, when they crack fuel & water vapours, oxygen usually combines with carbon. But the Paul Pantone GEET fuel reformer can output the oxygen contents not combined with carbon. Certified exhaust analyzers show a high oxygen content. The amount of oxygen depends on how everything is designed and adjusted. Some units still have some of the oxygen combining with carbon but the levels are still lower than typical fuel reformers. See aluka1603 analyzer's readings
Hi, I am building my first reactor just now, & came across your video, I must admit copper had crossed my mind too as it can be bolted & not welded cheaper too, but you give me food for thought here, good videos guy, very interesting & well put together.
Thom in Scotland.
fuelban 7 months ago
A friend I are trying to build a geet out of a 6.5 Onan genset. If there is a knowlageable geet builder in Washington state (Seattle area) that would like to mentor us, please contact me, BradLee, at (206) 854-1016. Thanks.
BradLee6960 10 months ago
@BradLee6960
Google search and join the yahoo group VortexHeatExchanger to get mentoring from myself and many other GEET builders.
narivasant 10 months ago
After making the vapours more dry going into the twin reactors, and added vapours of water with electrolyte, I was able to develop magnetic signatures on the reactor rods. The exhaust is not completely oderless but I can't get the engine to make any smoke regardless of how rich or lean I make the fresh air to reactor gases ratio so maybe a copper inner tube can work.
But I do not see any signs that it is any more efficient than using a ferromagnetic inner tube as recommended by Paul Pantone.
narivasant 3 years ago
Seems to run pretty good, how does it do on fuel consumption? Good luck in your research.
lhester2003 3 years ago
I don't know. I haven't taken measurements. I want to get a cracking reaction first. It seems to only vapourize the fuel when using copper instead of a ferromagnetic inner tube. Right now it requires a lot more fresh air to run. On a previous reactor with a steel inner tube I could have the fresh closed off almost completely and it still ran strong. I think that is a good test of if it is actually cracking, there is oxygen in the cracked gases so it doesn't need much fresh air to burn well.
narivasant 3 years ago
I should clarify, most fuel reformers, when they crack fuel & water vapours, oxygen usually combines with carbon. But the Paul Pantone GEET fuel reformer can output the oxygen contents not combined with carbon. Certified exhaust analyzers show a high oxygen content. The amount of oxygen depends on how everything is designed and adjusted. Some units still have some of the oxygen combining with carbon but the levels are still lower than typical fuel reformers. See aluka1603 analyzer's readings
narivasant 3 years ago