So you just need Hydrides but the US Govt does not allow Hydrides to be purchased or sold? Get this in the hands of the people and the laws will be changed overnight.
The reason for not implementing car run with water cos as long as the earth continue to produce petrol, they will not implement it. For economic reason (Money: i hate using this word cos accuse of being money oriented just by mentioning money lol by a mentally ill person). The sad part is my mechanic's brother killed himself because of this. As he was hoping they will use it to protect earth. So yeah it can be done and it is cool
@Nalambal Sounds like your mechanics brother was a nutcase. You cannot burn water. It must be put through electrolysis first and the oxygen and hydrogen must be separated. Then you can burn the hydrogen and oxygen to create water again. This process requires you to supply 8 time the amount of energy that you can produce from the hydrogen that you burn. It is moronic and a waste of time. He may have done us all a favor.
My mechanic and his brother are inventors. His brother invent car runs with water instead of petrol as his passion is environmental friendly. He sold it with a car company for millions (not sure if i am allowed to mention the car brand name So for security reason i won't). He was hoping they will use it but they didn't continue
WHY AREN'T WE USING THIS NOW?! WHY ARE COMPANIES TRYING TO MAKE ELECTRIC CARS STILL?! It's hopeless! Hydrogen is the way to go, and Honda is taking advantage of that with the FCX Clarity.
@Rogers1977 Because you can see in the demonstration, it takes electricity to break the h2o molecules. Not that h fuel experiments & technology are all bad but taking electricty from other fuel sources to make hydrogen is more wasteful than just burning the other fuel to begin with. When nuclear fusion comes about, hydrogen fuel will probably still be a better portable potential energy source than batteries when used to motor human transportation. I make auto fuel from wood but I'm not a genious
Unless they found a catalyst to break down water, then it takes 8X as much electricity to break the chemical bonds than you can get from the burning of the hydrogen gas that is produced.
@pilgrim15801 I do because the type of solar that everyone buys into is solar panels that are expensive to produce, fragile, and low efficiency as opposed to the solar stirling engines that are slated to go into the mojave to power California (which environmentalists are blocking because they might shade some desert tortoise). I'd like to see all solar and thorium nuclear generated electricity along with super capacitor powered cars that recharge in a minute, but....gov't BS
@pilgrim15801 and like I said, it would require 8 times the energy input to get the hydrogen to run your car. Which means that you would need more solar arrays than are necessary to run electric cars directly. The conversion from electricity to hydrogen is a mistake.
@simonjamesodell You didn't understand what I was saying. I'm against converting electric power to hydrogen fuel because of the 8x increase in power needed. I'm not for putting SVC's on cars directly. There isn't enough surface area to do that and you couldn't drive at night obviously. I am for developing better super capacitors that can handle more than 3 volt. The current caps can run a flashlight for 4 hours and recharge in 90 seconds. That made larger would be =)
@dlstb you should have a look at "Tesla Roadsters", they use a rack of lithium-ion batteries and they are in the super car performance bracket. Still takes 3 hours to charge them up and a range of only about 300 miles.
A properly engineered hydrogen system could be as convenient as petrol is by being available instantly at filling stations, and the hydrogen itself could be produced in hot climates where there is plenty of sunlight, and shipped the same way we ship oil now.
@simonjamesodell A properly researched and designed supercapacitor powered car could be just as potent as the Tesla and recharge in minutes as opposed to hours because a cap needs only to move electrons whereas a battery has to create and destroy chemical bonds between ions. Even better would be a gas powered car that had diesel level compression and a stirling engine to capture exhaust heat. I'm just against the 8:1 power loss you take in conversion to Hydrogen.
@dlstb sure, I hear what your saying, but such a machine is likely to need a lot of research funding and time to bring to the mass market. We could build hydrogen powered cars easily right now with existing techniques, and we could setup solar power plants in the desert to produce the hydrogen needed and distribute it without making too much changes to the existing infrastructure.
We need to invent 21st centry technology before we move on to 22nd tech...
@simonjamesodell Wrong. Have you even looked at the cost of converting a car from gasoline to CNG? I can tell you that in Oklahoma, it will cost ~$16k to convert a regular pickup to CNG. And this cost doesn't include the cost of converting the distribution system from gasoline to CNG. So you can only fill up at home with your own equipment or at an already made facility. A small IC generator running on gas with a stirling generator in a piggyback config would easy
@dlstb You Americans... all you ever think about is the costs involved in doing something, rather than whether its right to do it... I didn't suggest the conversion would be cheap, I said it would be easy to do with existing technology, as in, easy relative to the difficulty in engineering the system you suggested for which the technology doesn't yet exist in the form you have in mind. (I.e. super-capacitors with sufficient power capacity to drive a 1 ton vehicle.)
@simonjamesodell Actually, ALL of the technology to make an IC / stirling hybrid with some level of energy storage already exists and it would use the same fuel that we already use with double the economy. Your suggestion that we convert water to hydrogen would make us burn more to create enough energy, build more to provide refueling stations, and build more to get the hydrogen storage material that every such vehicle would need. You are a moron.
@simonjamesodell BTW, super capacitor exist currently and they are decreasing in price at a rate similar to the curve that all other computer parts follow. Soon they will cost less than lithium batteries per Joule of stored energy and they can withstand a near infinite number of cycles as compared to barely a few hundred charging cycles with a lithium battery or even your hydride storage tanks that will undoubtedly degrade quickly because of chemical reaction.
This is the first guy I have seen that knows what he is talking about, and taking the perfect approach to it. Green energy is the only approach to make this work, if your using grid power to create more output (hydrogen) then what your input is (electricity) then your breaking laws of thermodynamics... so simple. Id like to know how many kw's produced by his panels it takes to create enough hydrogen to run that car for 400 miles.
@frasercorey He say at 7:32 that it takes "about 8 hours or so" to fill the tanks but I would imagine you'd need a very large PV array if you were to derive the several kW needed to produce H on this scale. Where I live, we are lucky enough to get 8 hours of sunlight in a week at this time of year so this is where a finite resource fails to meet an exponential demand
Water Powered Cars can be a great Advantage --- cuz you dont need to buy water from a filling station --- just put water in your Car Tank -- it Converts into hydrogen gas -- we are good to go
Pakistan is much more Advance in AutoMotive --- here 90% (Over 10 Million Vehicles) of Cars + Buses + Rickshaw + Loading Trucks are already Running on CNG Gas (Compressed Natural Gas) all you gotta do is put a small kit no bigger than a Baseball Bat + 1 Cylinder in any car or truck -- (Around )and No need for Patrol or Diesel --
@ 6:09 he said this device could be powered by Solar or wind --- wat about rechargeable Batteries -- i mean Batteries can start the process and in return this process can also charge the Batteries once started so it can keep on going
"Killing people all over the world for oil" What a stupid mindless statement!! Show me one drop of oil that we have gotten form any of the places that we have troops. This is the mindless nature of the American liberal. Ten years have gone by and we are now out of Iraq. Where is the oil??? Do you think this idiot will ever reexamine his ideas in regards to facts? Not likely. This type of people disgust me.
Good luck to you, Please remember hydrogen in a battery in effect, its easy to generate, but the energy you get back by burning it is not greater than you need to do the electrolysis to split it.
back @ Banjo I am afraid you are confusing Catholicism for Christianity and there is a huge difference. We probably disagree on what science is. Science is supposed to be based on observation it has become based on presupposition and theory. Christians as a general term of inclusion would be like saying all blacks or all whites. Generalizations are generally foolish no?
there it is folks what more evidence do you need to no that we are being lied to by the gov about fuel and energy get off your ass and start trying to demand this energy to the public start demanding that we need electric cars,hydron cars,and stop paying high prices for gas,when we can do better is america that weak she dont no how to get the energy crices solved,wake up open your eyes this is 2012 lets get the ball rolling for a better life in america.
@MrTestpilot7 I am in total agreement for a better life in America. Lets throw all the idiots like you into the sea and America will be a better place. We should have a basic skills test to see if you are smart enough to be an American. If you believe this video says anything about a better America you are a fool.
@sanity599 you sound like a ass hole who are you working for the oil company or you just retirded as hell well if you are so great where are your idears on this problem,besides anybody is smarter than you are so crawl back under you rock.
@MrTestpilot7 Well being a fag I am sure you are an expert on assholes. I don't live under a rock I live in one of the most beautiful places in America. Right outside of Yellowstone Park. I'm sure you live in some shit hole part of a big city. You drive a shitty old small car that pollutes like an old steam engine. You rent your place to live and get paid by the hour. True lower class.
One guy said, negativly charged water wil burn like alcohol, he demonstrated this on his motorocycle and now missing.....
It worked *supposidly, and barely, but it did burn...? again, a video that could be faked but it seemed real yet Bob says ya hook negative to the hho side, which is alike the morotcycle mans idea. I ponder if we negative charge water and mist it better if it will just burn *in a finer mist with a large negative charge to it..Supercharged mist? =)
@BANJO Normally I don't comment but how is it that Christians are responsible for "fossil fuels"? You may want to rethink your Newton statement on that same topic as he was a devout Christian. I guess I cannot let go of the fact that you put facebook in with these others are you kidding me?
@towerpainter28 People claim that the USA founding fathers were Christians but most weren't. Newton was a Christian, he was also an occultist who spent lots of time trying to produce the philosopher's stone. Christians have always held back progress in the sciences. In times past one could be burned at the stake (in the name of God) for making scientific advancements. Since the church has lost most of its power today, Christians only get to ridicule scientists.
@chevydriver207 You need to re-watch it and/or read up on hydride hydrogen storage tanks.
The hydride releases the hydrogen too slowly to make an explosion. You can't make them explode if you try to on purpose. Put one in a room full of 100% oxygen, cut it open, and try to set it on fire - and it still won't explode.
The only way to make one of these explode is to strap a grenade to it, and even then all the explosive power is from the grenade, none from the fuel tank.
Great video clip, seems very interesting and informative. I say seems because these two guys lost me at the opening. Not their fault, mine for simply not understanding the detailed mechanics involved. I did notice the name, Bob Lazar, and wondered if it was the same guy I'd heard about in a non related area. Nice to know that there are smart people out there working on this energy matter. Keep up the good work and someday all this oil nonsense will be far behind us and the world safer.
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was captured on film. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is currently parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything...I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains the peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "Sam Zurick" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
the hydrite mentioned is where this video lost me...I thought he was going to say he had a stanely meyer -esque electrolyzer, but then he showed us that hokey radiation tower..
The correct definition of the First Law of Thermodynamics is: "If energy is applied to a system to bring it into an other condition, the same amount of energy must be removed from it, to restore the original condition.
With this definition one can understand that if the system is water from start, when it becomes the original water again at the end of whatever process, no net energy could be taken out in that process - it would then have come out of nothing.
ok i found out about the ufo fuel its ununpentium, element 115 ,and it says that only 4 atoms were ever made of it, but this guy bob lazar said the government had much much more of it, and i think he suggested he took some of it, and he said the aliens had alot of ,thats where the government got theres from and they had a more efficient way of producing it, come to think of it i think he talked about it befor it was even said to have made here,interesting
also what burns more efficiently, pure hydrogen or brown gas? id the 2 to 1 ratio of H to O the most efficient way to burn the H ? or is there a better more efficient mix? or is it the same as mixing the H with regular air, cause i would think that the pure oxygen would help the H burn much more efficiently since air is mostly nitrogen , but the 2 to 1 ratio may not be the best mix, so would 2 parts H to 1/2 part O be better? or would 2 parts O to 1 part H be better? what is the best HtoO ratio?
since the only thing that would be degrading to the engine would be heat, cause there would not be the impurities that gasoline leaves behind, when H burs there is nothing left behind to dirty the engine ever , so after 500k mi the inside of a ice ran only on h should be as clean as the day you got it, so only the components like ruber and plastics that are petrolem based and rubber based will wear out due to heating ,drying and heating and cooling repeatedly, saving on maintenence big time
the thing is that electric cars are way more efficient than petrol, and usinc electric to electrolyze water to H is going to be far more efficient than gas , and i like it better than the hydrogen fuel cell idea cause they are not durable , the plates dont last long thats why there are no fuel cell cars ,cause you would have to keep replacing the hydrogen fuel cell or the plater inside it which is not practicle, but running pre existing ice on H is and i bet the engin would last much longer
be able to make his own unpentium, i forget he atomic weight and number of the element, i forget if it was superdense like denser than plutonium, or if it was the opposite like lighter than H im guessing it was really super dense and unstable
i remember hearing him talk in art bell about how he was going to buy an accelerator and how he was going to try and produce some other element that he said he worked with when the government had him working on ufo's i wonder if this is really what he had planned on producing, and not the unpentium,i think it was called a special manmade element that he said he worked with that ran the flying saucers, and that he said he took some of, nd was goin to buy a missle silo to put a accelerator in to
could electrolyze enough hydrogen,to run the engine? and be able to carry enough water and batteries to run the electrolyzer too to get say a 200 mi range? how much room would it take up?i liek the ideo of a H ice over a fuel cell since the fuel cell plates corrode over time and are expensive to replace ,or i guess you could just use regular tanks, not hydride ones,i mean is the only advantage of the hydride the safety of it? or can it store more H that a regular tank of similar size?
ok but the car also still hadf the gas fill , so does it run on 100% hydrogen? and how much would it cost to make the hydride tanks? , also i saw some old jewish guy that had some similar, maybe it was the same material he said was a poris solid that could safely store H, i wonder if it was hydride or something else,also isnt hydride used in rechargeable batteries? like nimh, or nickle metal hydride? or is that something different?and could you have an electrolyzer or 4 of them onboard that
The correct definition of the First Law of Thermodymics is: "If energy is applied to a system to bring it into an other condition, the same amount of energy must be removed from it, to restore the original condition.
With this definition one can understand that if the system is water from start, when it becomes the original water again at the end of whatever process, no net energy could be taken out in that process - it would then have come out of nothing.
It's easy to make fuel from water !--H-H-O---This guy below [@beastman5566] --will be emailing me saying your wrong !, he does'nt event have a real web site !---Stanley meijers video--study it !--H-H-H fuel cell !-study it !---I like Bob Lazar but he's doing it the hard way !, the slow way !
Do not listen to the bought-off dickheads below. In another generation, they would have said the world is flat. They would have told Wilbur Wright that it would never get off the ground. They would have told Steve Jobs to get a job. They would have told Facebook...'What?". They would have told Newton that gravity did not exist. It is people like this who will save our planet from the "christians", "moslems", and republicans.
@BANJOSAM9999 you were doing so good. It is ironic though, you should prey the conservative republicans save this country from the progressive liberals.
@delvis11 iI dont think he read the end where it says GOVERNMENT regulation, cronyism, and subsidizing of OIL prevent this type of innovations, mot one branch or the other, GOVERNMENT PERIOd decides where human innovation ends up. if there were no regulations, people would use these "banned materials" to power the world cheaply (and drive down the cost OF EVERYTHING EVER) instead we let the government control these powerful resources for destruction.(D) is all about big govt.
@delvis11 BANJOSAM9999 is right.....but why would he pray that conservative republicans save us from liberals? conservatives believe conformism is patriotic. fail. they are racist. fail. they believe in the free market. big fail. bush sent troops to die for no reason. do i even need to say fail? so tell me why again republicans will save humanity? don't worry, i'll wait.
@BANJOSAM9999 I seem to be finding so many crackpot conspiracy theorists today, including you. You think you're so enlightened but actually you are living a delusion. I recommend therapy. ASAP.
@BANJOSAM9999 Another idiot that only see what he wants to see. At no point in this video do they tell you how much energy it takes to make the hydrogen and how much energy they get back. It will be less the fifty percent. Every time you go an energy conversion you lose energy. They do say if you are getting the electricity for free. See that beautiful meadow let fill it with windmills so I can drive my corvette to the super market.
@fluxrez No, water is *NOT* a source of energy. Why do you think it is a source of energy. What do you know that countless actual scientists don't know?
Do you even know what energy is? Do you know what the natural law of the conservation of energy is?
You can not create or destroy energy, only convert it.
If water would be source of energy, what would that water be converted to?
And remember, making hydrogen means you need a source of electric energy. Water itself isn't a source of energy.
@a1mint yes water is a source of energy. Water is made of hydrogen and oxygen. Any high school chemistry teacher can tell you that. Its very easy to separate the two as well. It requires a very low amount of electricity. Gasoline takes energy to remove from the earth and process as welll. Much more energy than it takes to convert water to hydrogen. Japan now has a car that is completely powered from water. Its just a matter of time. You are wrong.
@fluxrez You can not create or destroy energy, that's a natural law. You can only convert it. Water does not have usable energy to convert from. Had it been just hydrogen, it would give off heat when you bind it with oxygen. But it's already bound. It takes energy to split that hydrogen from the water. So, again, *NO*, water is *NOT* a source of energy.
So in fact, you are complete and entirely W R O N G !
@a1mint Yes, it does take energy to slit water into hydrogen and oxygen. But thats true for all energy. It takes energy to extract and process oil. As demonstrated in the video above, you could use solar panels to extract hydrogen from water over night to charge your vehicle... Water is a source of fuel. You lost.
@fluxrez You're comparing things that are completely different. When you split water, you are CONVERTING electrical energy into energy stored in the hydrogen. When you dig up oil, are are moving a substance that ALREADY HAS ENERGY STORED IN IT.
Solar panels convert energy in sunlight to electricity. A good way to use that is to store that in a battery and run an electric car on it. Not roundabout using as a hydrogen fuel in a combustion engine because that would extremely inefficient.
@fluxrez So, again, WATER IS NOT A SOURCE OF ENERGY. Water does not have any energy in it for us to use! Why are you not getting this? You have to SPEND energy to split it. The source of energy is not the water, but the ELECTRICITY source, which comes from elsewhere.
WATER is not fuel, it is NOT a source of energy. There is NO way in the world you can win this.
@a1mint you can use free energy, like solar energy, to harvest the hydrogen in water, then use that hydrogen to power your car... Wheres the fault in that? Water is a source of energy, just because you have to use energy to release it, doesn't mean its not a source of energy... Oil cannot be used in your car without refining it, that takes energy... just like water needs to be seperated into its base elements... NO its not all that efficient, but thats why we aren't driving hydrogen cars
@fluxrez No, water is *NOT* a source of energy. You're describing splitting water using solar energy. The source of energy there is solar energy. That energy is used to convert water to hydrogen (and oxygen), which has a stored amount of energy available in it. But the water itself is NOT a source of energy. The water isn't providing any energy. You can't give someone a bucket of water and expect that bucket of water to perform work - and that it has no available energy in it !
@fluxrez .... the fact that you have to spend energy to split water, *DOES* mean that water itself is not a source of energy. The water isn't sourcing any energy. What part of that are you not understanding?
Oil contains energy. It has a quantity of usable energy stored inside it ! The amount of energy to refine it is less than the amount of energy it will yield when burning it !
Water however, does *NOT* have an available quantity of energy in it.
@a1mint Yes it does... it has hydrogen. Hydrogen is combustible. That makes it an energy source. Use solar panels to apply a current to water releasing hydrogen, store the hydrogen. Place hydrogen in car. Run car... Tell me the fault with this logic, or you are just trolling and I am done here sir.
@fluxrez Water does *NOT* have energy. You have to spend AT LEAST AS MUCH energy to break that hydrogen from water, than the amount of energy you get from burning that hydrogen. What part of this are you having such a hard time with? Surely, this has been explained to you countless of times? In one ear, out the other? Are you retarded or something? Patheticly stupid !
@beastman5566 The argument is that some people are lying when they claim that water has energy. It does not. You have to spend energy to make that hydrogen.
@a1mint Listen dude, even if it does require more energy to extract hydrogen from water than you'll get out of the hydrogen by burning it you still have a fuel which you can burn in your engine or whatever and use. Have you ever checked out how much energy is required to create a litre of petrol considering the drilling of the oil well, the pumping of that crude to the surface, transport to a refinery and the energy used in the refinement process. You're using enegy all the time to make energy.
@ibleed1 There is no point converting the energy that is available in gasoline, to hydrogen, and then using that hydrogen in the car. Those are additional energy conversion steps, and every energy conversion incurs heat losses.
It takes less energy to refine oil to produce a liter of gasoline, than the amount of energy that that liter of gasoline will yield.
And no, you can not "make" energy, you can only convert it.
@Klause5425 yes, right when you start that car, hydrogen reacts with oxygen found in the atmosphere and wallah! H2O back to where it was. The best part, no smoke... oh lemme just say that again, NO SMOKE.
Be great to use this with a home electricrical generator system using some of the electrical power making the hydrogen.. I see the draw back is the expensive platnum electrodes and the chemicals.
O it's Bob Lazar of Area 51. A guy involved in back-engineering UFO propulsion system should really find it easy to run his car on hydrogen from water. Maybe noone else thought of the hydride..
@tnhl77 Say I take the car for a drive to my mates. Leave the car overnight and vualla - ice cubes in the morning. When I was in Norway the temp north of Norway was -30 to -40 and south from -5 to -20 in winter, so it will freeze in grage overnight anyway. In these countries the radiators use a greeny, bluey substance unlike water to prevent freezing, nothing - else works.
@a2zhandi Then have to take into consideration what the chemical reaction will be in the electrolyte solution of the Anti-Freeze moecules. What byproducts will remain at the bottom of the solution and how would it affect performance i.e during the electrolysis process what does the anti-freez turn into. AND do we have to top up Antifreeze on every water fill? What does that cost?
@FreePizza007 yea I know. For every action, there's a reaction. I've only been working with electrolysis for about 2 months.
I assume the antifreeze components would remain in the cell. And only have to add electrolyte. Much the same as a car battery. Hmm It's a hurdle I'll cross when I get to it. It won't be long and it'll be freezing temps.
sell this shit on the black market or give it to the people give them the knowledge to take out these stupid ass gas companies lets do it people if big gas companies know who you are and your trying to sell this out they will take your ass out !
Great Vid, but the title shouldn't be Run your car on water, as it is not really describing what is happening here...Run your car on Hydrogen would be more accurate...
@x65535x They want you to think you have to be a quantum physicist before you can come up with something like this.There are hundreds of videos that show you only have to be a below average redneck.
This video shows a man that has physics and chemistry knowledge that allowed him to use natural energy sources and store it in his car. Converting energy from one form to another to transport him.
The "rednecks" on youtube as you say are just very confused people that "think" they know what they are doing, they are also either lying or are confused on how to do math.
I think it's time we all approach congress on these issues of obtaining these materials for energy production purposes on a mass scale so we can officially rid our dependence on foreign oil. We are supposed to be a free society with rights... Our government / country is so slow to respond to our concerns and our ideas to fix these problems. If we can get these idiots in office to wake up and stop being greedy and let us get it done.. I am game. lets get going and do this. LET THEM TAKE NOTE
@jasonharville1 lol you wont be allowed to.the oil industry controles your senate, and untill ALL the oil is gone your not gonna get any renewable energy sources.cos if you get your cheap energy then the oil barons dont get your money.
what particle are u smashing in your "particle accelerator" lol
and how can u get Lithium hydroxide out of doing it ?
that sound hard=P
And u dont need this material to make hydrogen, its just make the process quicker? or what do u mean, i dont understand how(quote) u stor hydrogen more effificently and safely?? i think u hold alot of infromation to your self....
rofl
and yea when i say u(you) i mean him to uber cool guy...
@Mutubeish i think he was saying sommething like . the hydride in the tanks. is what he needs the particle accelerator for just the hydride or something in side the molecules of the hydride? they have to hold the information for them selves if they didnt then people would either try and make it themselves and blow them selfs up and maybe the whole world governmets cant really be expected to look after the welfare of its people while at the same time let them mess around with this kinda stuff
Let me alliviate some misconceptions. Hydride is not just one element, it is a term for a solid that can hold and store hydrogen. There are several hydrides either natural or in compounds. An example is Ammonia Borane (Compound) and Magnesium (Element). Both store hydrogen and release it under heat.
i love it, just plug it in to your SOLAR panel like he does, turn on the water, and let it charge the tanks in your car OVER NIGHT for 8 hours. lol solar power at night roflmao.
Here in my back yard I have a partical accelerator built from the plans I got off the Ghostbusters website.If you fell for this it's time to retire the pipe.
7:55 Anyone else find this to be BS and a scam on our Gov. part, I know I sure do. Not available despite not being dangerous? That tells me the Gov. has known forever what these chemicals can be used for to "help" all of us, but obviously refuse to do it.
@HostileHST The word "government" means the agency or organization in place to facilitate societal well being. Even communists need their people to enslave them. But, here in this country, we have something other than government. It'
No Shit Bob lazar!
MrTaz1964 1 week ago
So you just need Hydrides but the US Govt does not allow Hydrides to be purchased or sold? Get this in the hands of the people and the laws will be changed overnight.
carsearch2001 1 week ago
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
freddiehaba 1 week ago
The reason for not implementing car run with water cos as long as the earth continue to produce petrol, they will not implement it. For economic reason (Money: i hate using this word cos accuse of being money oriented just by mentioning money lol by a mentally ill person). The sad part is my mechanic's brother killed himself because of this. As he was hoping they will use it to protect earth. So yeah it can be done and it is cool
Nalambal 1 week ago
@Nalambal Sounds like your mechanics brother was a nutcase. You cannot burn water. It must be put through electrolysis first and the oxygen and hydrogen must be separated. Then you can burn the hydrogen and oxygen to create water again. This process requires you to supply 8 time the amount of energy that you can produce from the hydrogen that you burn. It is moronic and a waste of time. He may have done us all a favor.
dlstb 4 days ago
My mechanic and his brother are inventors. His brother invent car runs with water instead of petrol as his passion is environmental friendly. He sold it with a car company for millions (not sure if i am allowed to mention the car brand name So for security reason i won't). He was hoping they will use it but they didn't continue
Nalambal 1 week ago
@Nalambal Right.....
Kinematographer 1 week ago
is this bob lazar of sector 51 fame (alleged)
PHONEYPOLITICS 1 week ago in playlist survivalist tips
@PHONEYPOLITICS i think it is yes
red88ization 1 week ago
wow i feel like I'm watching an idiot abroad
pilgrim15801 2 weeks ago
I bet he is dead.
BitHead1000 2 weeks ago
it is far cheaper to run an electric car...
SpeedyCheeze 2 weeks ago
WHY AREN'T WE USING THIS NOW?! WHY ARE COMPANIES TRYING TO MAKE ELECTRIC CARS STILL?! It's hopeless! Hydrogen is the way to go, and Honda is taking advantage of that with the FCX Clarity.
Rogers1977 2 weeks ago
@Rogers1977 Because you can see in the demonstration, it takes electricity to break the h2o molecules. Not that h fuel experiments & technology are all bad but taking electricty from other fuel sources to make hydrogen is more wasteful than just burning the other fuel to begin with. When nuclear fusion comes about, hydrogen fuel will probably still be a better portable potential energy source than batteries when used to motor human transportation. I make auto fuel from wood but I'm not a genious
wiscokiddd 1 week ago
BOB LAZAR GENIOUS!!!! PASS THIS VIRAL!!!
LPOSANDYMAN 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch my save money on fuel with one wire vid.
jocell202 3 weeks ago
BOB...WHAT A WAY THE KICK THE GOV. ASS..!!
peoplegovern 3 weeks ago
Unless they found a catalyst to break down water, then it takes 8X as much electricity to break the chemical bonds than you can get from the burning of the hydrogen gas that is produced.
dlstb 3 weeks ago
@dlstb who cares if it's electric from solar
pilgrim15801 2 weeks ago
@pilgrim15801 I do because the type of solar that everyone buys into is solar panels that are expensive to produce, fragile, and low efficiency as opposed to the solar stirling engines that are slated to go into the mojave to power California (which environmentalists are blocking because they might shade some desert tortoise). I'd like to see all solar and thorium nuclear generated electricity along with super capacitor powered cars that recharge in a minute, but....gov't BS
dlstb 1 week ago
@pilgrim15801 and like I said, it would require 8 times the energy input to get the hydrogen to run your car. Which means that you would need more solar arrays than are necessary to run electric cars directly. The conversion from electricity to hydrogen is a mistake.
dlstb 1 week ago
@dlstb yeh but if your batteries run out on a cloudy day your stuffed, whereas if you have a cache of hydrogen stored up you can keep running.
simonjamesodell 1 week ago in playlist lawful conduct 2
@simonjamesodell You didn't understand what I was saying. I'm against converting electric power to hydrogen fuel because of the 8x increase in power needed. I'm not for putting SVC's on cars directly. There isn't enough surface area to do that and you couldn't drive at night obviously. I am for developing better super capacitors that can handle more than 3 volt. The current caps can run a flashlight for 4 hours and recharge in 90 seconds. That made larger would be =)
dlstb 1 week ago
@dlstb you should have a look at "Tesla Roadsters", they use a rack of lithium-ion batteries and they are in the super car performance bracket. Still takes 3 hours to charge them up and a range of only about 300 miles.
A properly engineered hydrogen system could be as convenient as petrol is by being available instantly at filling stations, and the hydrogen itself could be produced in hot climates where there is plenty of sunlight, and shipped the same way we ship oil now.
simonjamesodell 1 week ago
@simonjamesodell A properly researched and designed supercapacitor powered car could be just as potent as the Tesla and recharge in minutes as opposed to hours because a cap needs only to move electrons whereas a battery has to create and destroy chemical bonds between ions. Even better would be a gas powered car that had diesel level compression and a stirling engine to capture exhaust heat. I'm just against the 8:1 power loss you take in conversion to Hydrogen.
dlstb 1 week ago
@dlstb sure, I hear what your saying, but such a machine is likely to need a lot of research funding and time to bring to the mass market. We could build hydrogen powered cars easily right now with existing techniques, and we could setup solar power plants in the desert to produce the hydrogen needed and distribute it without making too much changes to the existing infrastructure.
We need to invent 21st centry technology before we move on to 22nd tech...
simonjamesodell 1 week ago
@simonjamesodell Wrong. Have you even looked at the cost of converting a car from gasoline to CNG? I can tell you that in Oklahoma, it will cost ~$16k to convert a regular pickup to CNG. And this cost doesn't include the cost of converting the distribution system from gasoline to CNG. So you can only fill up at home with your own equipment or at an already made facility. A small IC generator running on gas with a stirling generator in a piggyback config would easy
dlstb 4 days ago
@dlstb You Americans... all you ever think about is the costs involved in doing something, rather than whether its right to do it... I didn't suggest the conversion would be cheap, I said it would be easy to do with existing technology, as in, easy relative to the difficulty in engineering the system you suggested for which the technology doesn't yet exist in the form you have in mind. (I.e. super-capacitors with sufficient power capacity to drive a 1 ton vehicle.)
simonjamesodell 4 days ago
@simonjamesodell Actually, ALL of the technology to make an IC / stirling hybrid with some level of energy storage already exists and it would use the same fuel that we already use with double the economy. Your suggestion that we convert water to hydrogen would make us burn more to create enough energy, build more to provide refueling stations, and build more to get the hydrogen storage material that every such vehicle would need. You are a moron.
dlstb 3 days ago
@simonjamesodell BTW, super capacitor exist currently and they are decreasing in price at a rate similar to the curve that all other computer parts follow. Soon they will cost less than lithium batteries per Joule of stored energy and they can withstand a near infinite number of cycles as compared to barely a few hundred charging cycles with a lithium battery or even your hydride storage tanks that will undoubtedly degrade quickly because of chemical reaction.
dlstb 3 days ago
...oh, and you'll need a partical accelerator in your backyard : D
fpsPirate 3 weeks ago
watch my save money on fuel with one wire vid.
jocell202 3 weeks ago
...is he THAT Bob Lazar?? He actually runs around in a sporty UFO, powered by element 115... who cares about hydrogen!?!?
samoht1977 3 weeks ago
@samoht1977 yep I think it's the same bob lazar who claimed he worked in area 51 so it has to be true?
gordon7443 3 weeks ago
@gordon7443 Yes he's the same guy, Well, I actually think that we reached a point where even a "water-operated engine" is already old...
samoht1977 3 weeks ago
Now I would love to believe yet this, however, over unity thing pops up and spoils the hypothosis.
Keep it simple for all to understand: one cannot get more energy out, than is put in..
please show me how and we can all be multi billionaires.... " Mighty Mammon make me rich quick without a hitch"
1stMrSceptical 4 weeks ago
This is the first guy I have seen that knows what he is talking about, and taking the perfect approach to it. Green energy is the only approach to make this work, if your using grid power to create more output (hydrogen) then what your input is (electricity) then your breaking laws of thermodynamics... so simple. Id like to know how many kw's produced by his panels it takes to create enough hydrogen to run that car for 400 miles.
frasercorey 1 month ago
@frasercorey He say at 7:32 that it takes "about 8 hours or so" to fill the tanks but I would imagine you'd need a very large PV array if you were to derive the several kW needed to produce H on this scale. Where I live, we are lucky enough to get 8 hours of sunlight in a week at this time of year so this is where a finite resource fails to meet an exponential demand
g7txu 3 weeks ago
Didnt this guy work in S-4 area 51 ? Rob Lazar ? People say he is the same guy as Dr.Greer from the disclosure project.
Wickedness2k10 1 month ago
Water Powered Cars can be a great Advantage --- cuz you dont need to buy water from a filling station --- just put water in your Car Tank -- it Converts into hydrogen gas -- we are good to go
watup2154 1 month ago
Pakistan is much more Advance in AutoMotive --- here 90% (Over 10 Million Vehicles) of Cars + Buses + Rickshaw + Loading Trucks are already Running on CNG Gas (Compressed Natural Gas) all you gotta do is put a small kit no bigger than a Baseball Bat + 1 Cylinder in any car or truck -- (Around )and No need for Patrol or Diesel --
watup2154 1 month ago
@watup2154 wow amazing my freind its amazing how corrupt the western world is the coperations just dont care about us they want to be billionaires
treverbettis 3 weeks ago
@ 6:09 he said this device could be powered by Solar or wind --- wat about rechargeable Batteries -- i mean Batteries can start the process and in return this process can also charge the Batteries once started so it can keep on going
watup2154 1 month ago
@watup2154 your way out in left field picking dandelions.......
frasercorey 1 month ago
"Killing people all over the world for oil" What a stupid mindless statement!! Show me one drop of oil that we have gotten form any of the places that we have troops. This is the mindless nature of the American liberal. Ten years have gone by and we are now out of Iraq. Where is the oil??? Do you think this idiot will ever reexamine his ideas in regards to facts? Not likely. This type of people disgust me.
sanity599 1 month ago
Good luck to you, Please remember hydrogen in a battery in effect, its easy to generate, but the energy you get back by burning it is not greater than you need to do the electrolysis to split it.
logtothebase2 1 month ago
Bob Lazar used to work on UFOs at Area51. Hyrdogen-fuel vehicles are a very good idea. Oil companies don't want it though.
TriggerJunkie 1 month ago
back @ Banjo I am afraid you are confusing Catholicism for Christianity and there is a huge difference. We probably disagree on what science is. Science is supposed to be based on observation it has become based on presupposition and theory. Christians as a general term of inclusion would be like saying all blacks or all whites. Generalizations are generally foolish no?
towerpainter28 1 month ago
my seventh grade teacher had one of those electrolysis machines and did the same experiment in class years ago!
amishnation 1 month ago
+
there it is folks what more evidence do you need to no that we are being lied to by the gov about fuel and energy get off your ass and start trying to demand this energy to the public start demanding that we need electric cars,hydron cars,and stop paying high prices for gas,when we can do better is america that weak she dont no how to get the energy crices solved,wake up open your eyes this is 2012 lets get the ball rolling for a better life in america.
MrTestpilot7 1 month ago
@MrTestpilot7 I am in total agreement for a better life in America. Lets throw all the idiots like you into the sea and America will be a better place. We should have a basic skills test to see if you are smart enough to be an American. If you believe this video says anything about a better America you are a fool.
sanity599 1 month ago
@sanity599 you sound like a ass hole who are you working for the oil company or you just retirded as hell well if you are so great where are your idears on this problem,besides anybody is smarter than you are so crawl back under you rock.
MrTestpilot7 1 month ago
@MrTestpilot7 Well being a fag I am sure you are an expert on assholes. I don't live under a rock I live in one of the most beautiful places in America. Right outside of Yellowstone Park. I'm sure you live in some shit hole part of a big city. You drive a shitty old small car that pollutes like an old steam engine. You rent your place to live and get paid by the hour. True lower class.
sanity599 1 month ago
One guy said, negativly charged water wil burn like alcohol, he demonstrated this on his motorocycle and now missing.....
It worked *supposidly, and barely, but it did burn...? again, a video that could be faked but it seemed real yet Bob says ya hook negative to the hho side, which is alike the morotcycle mans idea. I ponder if we negative charge water and mist it better if it will just burn *in a finer mist with a large negative charge to it..Supercharged mist? =)
RobMonty248 1 month ago
Bob Lazars voice...
RobMonty248 1 month ago
@BANJO Normally I don't comment but how is it that Christians are responsible for "fossil fuels"? You may want to rethink your Newton statement on that same topic as he was a devout Christian. I guess I cannot let go of the fact that you put facebook in with these others are you kidding me?
towerpainter28 1 month ago
@towerpainter28 People claim that the USA founding fathers were Christians but most weren't. Newton was a Christian, he was also an occultist who spent lots of time trying to produce the philosopher's stone. Christians have always held back progress in the sciences. In times past one could be burned at the stake (in the name of God) for making scientific advancements. Since the church has lost most of its power today, Christians only get to ridicule scientists.
amishnation 1 month ago
I was expecting another snake oil HHO kit vid, but this looks like the real thing...
Hydride fuel tanks ftw!
MadMuddyZuk 1 month ago
I heard that big companies pay big money to these people who come out with this technology.
2159money 2 months ago
@2159money no you got it all wrong, big companies suppress these people because it is a threat to energy companies
punkchewbacca 1 month ago
whats at 7:35?
bmogan23 2 months ago
Only downside to this, is if you got into a serious enough accident it might make those tanks explode
chevydriver207 2 months ago
@chevydriver207 You need to re-watch it and/or read up on hydride hydrogen storage tanks.
The hydride releases the hydrogen too slowly to make an explosion. You can't make them explode if you try to on purpose. Put one in a room full of 100% oxygen, cut it open, and try to set it on fire - and it still won't explode.
The only way to make one of these explode is to strap a grenade to it, and even then all the explosive power is from the grenade, none from the fuel tank.
MadMuddyZuk 1 month ago
@chevydriver207 and the upside of gasoline tanks iis that they dont explode :)
kyoojona 1 month ago
I used to eat particle accelerators for breakfast, but then i got an
»»───(knee)───►
(shot by the FDA)
DRMusicRoom 2 months ago
Think about this---->When hydro cars become mainstream, guys are going to Piss in their fuel tanks...
Soooo...in theory Your local Bar becomes also your Gas Station.
MrManboobie 2 months ago
Bob Lazar? The UFO guy????
jw20002 3 months ago
@jw20002 i thought so too.
khogaahmed 2 months ago
Great video clip, seems very interesting and informative. I say seems because these two guys lost me at the opening. Not their fault, mine for simply not understanding the detailed mechanics involved. I did notice the name, Bob Lazar, and wondered if it was the same guy I'd heard about in a non related area. Nice to know that there are smart people out there working on this energy matter. Keep up the good work and someday all this oil nonsense will be far behind us and the world safer.
jerryb9105 3 months ago
Comment removed
wyfmdotus 3 months ago
did anybody notice the tesla divice he has running in his garden !at 7.35 on the vid you can see it cool
bongobermo1 3 months ago
If only the human mind was allowed to work for the good of humanity instead of wars n distruction this earth would be paradise for us all
polygamous1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was captured on film. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is currently parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything...I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains the peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "Sam Zurick" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
peopledick 3 months ago
the hydrite mentioned is where this video lost me...I thought he was going to say he had a stanely meyer -esque electrolyzer, but then he showed us that hokey radiation tower..
wotan237 4 months ago
isn't that the weird ufo area 51 guy.
facebrodcast 4 months ago
Why the hell are we not living in a utopia yet. Seriously WTF
rcvideogamer 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The correct definition of the First Law of Thermodynamics is: "If energy is applied to a system to bring it into an other condition, the same amount of energy must be removed from it, to restore the original condition.
With this definition one can understand that if the system is water from start, when it becomes the original water again at the end of whatever process, no net energy could be taken out in that process - it would then have come out of nothing.
Thermospecialist 4 months ago
oh my god ! 4 alien capsules in his car !
Bob why you do not post some plans about it ? Thank you bob... You look better with no glasses ! Good luck !
mptrax 4 months ago
ok i found out about the ufo fuel its ununpentium, element 115 ,and it says that only 4 atoms were ever made of it, but this guy bob lazar said the government had much much more of it, and i think he suggested he took some of it, and he said the aliens had alot of ,thats where the government got theres from and they had a more efficient way of producing it, come to think of it i think he talked about it befor it was even said to have made here,interesting
bulletproof2353 4 months ago
also what burns more efficiently, pure hydrogen or brown gas? id the 2 to 1 ratio of H to O the most efficient way to burn the H ? or is there a better more efficient mix? or is it the same as mixing the H with regular air, cause i would think that the pure oxygen would help the H burn much more efficiently since air is mostly nitrogen , but the 2 to 1 ratio may not be the best mix, so would 2 parts H to 1/2 part O be better? or would 2 parts O to 1 part H be better? what is the best HtoO ratio?
bulletproof2353 4 months ago
since the only thing that would be degrading to the engine would be heat, cause there would not be the impurities that gasoline leaves behind, when H burs there is nothing left behind to dirty the engine ever , so after 500k mi the inside of a ice ran only on h should be as clean as the day you got it, so only the components like ruber and plastics that are petrolem based and rubber based will wear out due to heating ,drying and heating and cooling repeatedly, saving on maintenence big time
bulletproof2353 4 months ago
the thing is that electric cars are way more efficient than petrol, and usinc electric to electrolyze water to H is going to be far more efficient than gas , and i like it better than the hydrogen fuel cell idea cause they are not durable , the plates dont last long thats why there are no fuel cell cars ,cause you would have to keep replacing the hydrogen fuel cell or the plater inside it which is not practicle, but running pre existing ice on H is and i bet the engin would last much longer
bulletproof2353 4 months ago
be able to make his own unpentium, i forget he atomic weight and number of the element, i forget if it was superdense like denser than plutonium, or if it was the opposite like lighter than H im guessing it was really super dense and unstable
stuff ,
bulletproof2353 4 months ago
i remember hearing him talk in art bell about how he was going to buy an accelerator and how he was going to try and produce some other element that he said he worked with when the government had him working on ufo's i wonder if this is really what he had planned on producing, and not the unpentium,i think it was called a special manmade element that he said he worked with that ran the flying saucers, and that he said he took some of, nd was goin to buy a missle silo to put a accelerator in to
bulletproof2353 4 months ago
could electrolyze enough hydrogen,to run the engine? and be able to carry enough water and batteries to run the electrolyzer too to get say a 200 mi range? how much room would it take up?i liek the ideo of a H ice over a fuel cell since the fuel cell plates corrode over time and are expensive to replace ,or i guess you could just use regular tanks, not hydride ones,i mean is the only advantage of the hydride the safety of it? or can it store more H that a regular tank of similar size?
bulletproof2353 4 months ago
ok but the car also still hadf the gas fill , so does it run on 100% hydrogen? and how much would it cost to make the hydride tanks? , also i saw some old jewish guy that had some similar, maybe it was the same material he said was a poris solid that could safely store H, i wonder if it was hydride or something else,also isnt hydride used in rechargeable batteries? like nimh, or nickle metal hydride? or is that something different?and could you have an electrolyzer or 4 of them onboard that
bulletproof2353 4 months ago
The correct definition of the First Law of Thermodymics is: "If energy is applied to a system to bring it into an other condition, the same amount of energy must be removed from it, to restore the original condition.
With this definition one can understand that if the system is water from start, when it becomes the original water again at the end of whatever process, no net energy could be taken out in that process - it would then have come out of nothing.
Thermospecialist 4 months ago
BOB LAZAR?
Vensonmusic 4 months ago
It's easy to make fuel from water !--H-H-O---This guy below [@beastman5566] --will be emailing me saying your wrong !, he does'nt event have a real web site !---Stanley meijers video--study it !--H-H-H fuel cell !-study it !---I like Bob Lazar but he's doing it the hard way !, the slow way !
einsteindrieu 4 months ago
@einsteindrieu Stan Meyer was a convicted crook, scam artist, a liar, and a thief.
Of course, you delusional morons think it's all a conspiracy by the oooohhhh oil companies oooohhh echo echo echo.
What you need to actually "study" is actual science, and the laws of thermodynamics.
a1mint 4 months ago
I do have one of these devices on my own Vette and have found that I have gained at least 31mpg.
storkfmny 4 months ago
Do not listen to the bought-off dickheads below. In another generation, they would have said the world is flat. They would have told Wilbur Wright that it would never get off the ground. They would have told Steve Jobs to get a job. They would have told Facebook...'What?". They would have told Newton that gravity did not exist. It is people like this who will save our planet from the "christians", "moslems", and republicans.
BANJOSAM9999 4 months ago
@BANJOSAM9999 you were doing so good. It is ironic though, you should prey the conservative republicans save this country from the progressive liberals.
delvis11 4 months ago
@delvis11 you should both hope that it is not up to the government to save our planet.....but up to the people.
pologenius21 3 months ago
@delvis11 iI dont think he read the end where it says GOVERNMENT regulation, cronyism, and subsidizing of OIL prevent this type of innovations, mot one branch or the other, GOVERNMENT PERIOd decides where human innovation ends up. if there were no regulations, people would use these "banned materials" to power the world cheaply (and drive down the cost OF EVERYTHING EVER) instead we let the government control these powerful resources for destruction.(D) is all about big govt.
masterplanisnoplan 3 months ago
Comment removed
johnniefive80 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@delvis11 BANJOSAM9999 is right.....but why would he pray that conservative republicans save us from liberals? conservatives believe conformism is patriotic. fail. they are racist. fail. they believe in the free market. big fail. bush sent troops to die for no reason. do i even need to say fail? so tell me why again republicans will save humanity? don't worry, i'll wait.
johnniefive80 3 months ago
Comment removed
forugh3 2 months ago
@delvis11 AMEN
noctemaeternus0 2 months ago
@BANJOSAM9999 Completely unrelated to water. Water is NOT a source of energy, PERIOD !
To suggest otherwise is completely RETARDED !
a1mint 4 months ago
@BANJOSAM9999 I seem to be finding so many crackpot conspiracy theorists today, including you. You think you're so enlightened but actually you are living a delusion. I recommend therapy. ASAP.
ibleed1 4 months ago
@BANJOSAM9999 I agree.
amishnation 1 month ago
@BANJOSAM9999 Another idiot that only see what he wants to see. At no point in this video do they tell you how much energy it takes to make the hydrogen and how much energy they get back. It will be less the fifty percent. Every time you go an energy conversion you lose energy. They do say if you are getting the electricity for free. See that beautiful meadow let fill it with windmills so I can drive my corvette to the super market.
sanity599 1 month ago
You can't "run a car on water", because water is not a source of energy !
a1mint 4 months ago
@a1mint water IS a source of energy... its just not easy to harness it
fluxrez 4 months ago
@fluxrez No, water is *NOT* a source of energy. Why do you think it is a source of energy. What do you know that countless actual scientists don't know?
Do you even know what energy is? Do you know what the natural law of the conservation of energy is?
You can not create or destroy energy, only convert it.
If water would be source of energy, what would that water be converted to?
And remember, making hydrogen means you need a source of electric energy. Water itself isn't a source of energy.
a1mint 4 months ago
@a1mint yes water is a source of energy. Water is made of hydrogen and oxygen. Any high school chemistry teacher can tell you that. Its very easy to separate the two as well. It requires a very low amount of electricity. Gasoline takes energy to remove from the earth and process as welll. Much more energy than it takes to convert water to hydrogen. Japan now has a car that is completely powered from water. Its just a matter of time. You are wrong.
fluxrez 4 months ago
@fluxrez You can not create or destroy energy, that's a natural law. You can only convert it. Water does not have usable energy to convert from. Had it been just hydrogen, it would give off heat when you bind it with oxygen. But it's already bound. It takes energy to split that hydrogen from the water. So, again, *NO*, water is *NOT* a source of energy.
So in fact, you are complete and entirely W R O N G !
Sorry you loose. nah nah nah nah nah !
a1mint 4 months ago
@a1mint Yes, it does take energy to slit water into hydrogen and oxygen. But thats true for all energy. It takes energy to extract and process oil. As demonstrated in the video above, you could use solar panels to extract hydrogen from water over night to charge your vehicle... Water is a source of fuel. You lost.
fluxrez 4 months ago
@fluxrez You're comparing things that are completely different. When you split water, you are CONVERTING electrical energy into energy stored in the hydrogen. When you dig up oil, are are moving a substance that ALREADY HAS ENERGY STORED IN IT.
Solar panels convert energy in sunlight to electricity. A good way to use that is to store that in a battery and run an electric car on it. Not roundabout using as a hydrogen fuel in a combustion engine because that would extremely inefficient.
a1mint 4 months ago
@fluxrez So, again, WATER IS NOT A SOURCE OF ENERGY. Water does not have any energy in it for us to use! Why are you not getting this? You have to SPEND energy to split it. The source of energy is not the water, but the ELECTRICITY source, which comes from elsewhere.
WATER is not fuel, it is NOT a source of energy. There is NO way in the world you can win this.
a1mint 4 months ago
@a1mint you can use free energy, like solar energy, to harvest the hydrogen in water, then use that hydrogen to power your car... Wheres the fault in that? Water is a source of energy, just because you have to use energy to release it, doesn't mean its not a source of energy... Oil cannot be used in your car without refining it, that takes energy... just like water needs to be seperated into its base elements... NO its not all that efficient, but thats why we aren't driving hydrogen cars
fluxrez 4 months ago
@fluxrez No, water is *NOT* a source of energy. You're describing splitting water using solar energy. The source of energy there is solar energy. That energy is used to convert water to hydrogen (and oxygen), which has a stored amount of energy available in it. But the water itself is NOT a source of energy. The water isn't providing any energy. You can't give someone a bucket of water and expect that bucket of water to perform work - and that it has no available energy in it !
a1mint 4 months ago
@fluxrez .... the fact that you have to spend energy to split water, *DOES* mean that water itself is not a source of energy. The water isn't sourcing any energy. What part of that are you not understanding?
Oil contains energy. It has a quantity of usable energy stored inside it ! The amount of energy to refine it is less than the amount of energy it will yield when burning it !
Water however, does *NOT* have an available quantity of energy in it.
The two are entirely different things.
a1mint 4 months ago
@a1mint Yes it does... it has hydrogen. Hydrogen is combustible. That makes it an energy source. Use solar panels to apply a current to water releasing hydrogen, store the hydrogen. Place hydrogen in car. Run car... Tell me the fault with this logic, or you are just trolling and I am done here sir.
fluxrez 4 months ago
@fluxrez Water does *NOT* have energy. You have to spend AT LEAST AS MUCH energy to break that hydrogen from water, than the amount of energy you get from burning that hydrogen. What part of this are you having such a hard time with? Surely, this has been explained to you countless of times? In one ear, out the other? Are you retarded or something? Patheticly stupid !
a1mint 4 months ago
@a1mint
but surely you understand that we can't continue to burn fossil fuels, so why even argue about the subject?
beastman5566 4 months ago
@beastman5566 The argument is that some people are lying when they claim that water has energy. It does not. You have to spend energy to make that hydrogen.
Fossil fuels is a completely unrelated topic.
a1mint 4 months ago
@a1mint Listen dude, even if it does require more energy to extract hydrogen from water than you'll get out of the hydrogen by burning it you still have a fuel which you can burn in your engine or whatever and use. Have you ever checked out how much energy is required to create a litre of petrol considering the drilling of the oil well, the pumping of that crude to the surface, transport to a refinery and the energy used in the refinement process. You're using enegy all the time to make energy.
ibleed1 4 months ago
@ibleed1 There is no point converting the energy that is available in gasoline, to hydrogen, and then using that hydrogen in the car. Those are additional energy conversion steps, and every energy conversion incurs heat losses.
It takes less energy to refine oil to produce a liter of gasoline, than the amount of energy that that liter of gasoline will yield.
And no, you can not "make" energy, you can only convert it.
a1mint 4 months ago
Did the aliens teach Bob how to do this when he's not busy reverse engineering their technology for the Govt?
jdollinter 4 months ago
Does that hydrogen generator shown in the video make pressure into the car tanks, ? Which is the hydrogen pressure inside the tanks of the car?
lavoslav1963 4 months ago
does the water eventually return to its origional form?
Klause5425 5 months ago
@Klause5425 yes, right when you start that car, hydrogen reacts with oxygen found in the atmosphere and wallah! H2O back to where it was. The best part, no smoke... oh lemme just say that again, NO SMOKE.
snipersinghkhalsa 5 months ago
@snipersinghkhalsathis is the answer to are fuel crisis!!
Klause5425 5 months ago
Be great to use this with a home electricrical generator system using some of the electrical power making the hydrogen.. I see the draw back is the expensive platnum electrodes and the chemicals.
chuckbear1961 5 months ago
His voice sounds like bob lazaar..
RobMonty248 5 months ago
O it's Bob Lazar of Area 51. A guy involved in back-engineering UFO propulsion system should really find it easy to run his car on hydrogen from water. Maybe noone else thought of the hydride..
dsupanga 5 months ago
Doesn't this, among other obvious actions /laws made by supposed elected officials prove those bastards are up oil industry's asses?
FORGET THEM!
Carry on....
a2zhandi 5 months ago
Hahah isn't that Bob Lazar, the UFO guy?
TRZbebop675 6 months ago
@TRZbebop675 Thats wat I thought... No big glasses though..lol
EasyEbookMan 6 months ago
Good idea but What do you do in winter when the water fuel will freeze.
FreePizza007 6 months ago
@FreePizza007 do it inside a garage duh
tnhl77 6 months ago
@tnhl77 Say I take the car for a drive to my mates. Leave the car overnight and vualla - ice cubes in the morning. When I was in Norway the temp north of Norway was -30 to -40 and south from -5 to -20 in winter, so it will freeze in grage overnight anyway. In these countries the radiators use a greeny, bluey substance unlike water to prevent freezing, nothing - else works.
FreePizza007 5 months ago
@FreePizza007 same as you do for your car. Add some "antifreeze"
a2zhandi 5 months ago
@a2zhandi Then have to take into consideration what the chemical reaction will be in the electrolyte solution of the Anti-Freeze moecules. What byproducts will remain at the bottom of the solution and how would it affect performance i.e during the electrolysis process what does the anti-freez turn into. AND do we have to top up Antifreeze on every water fill? What does that cost?
FreePizza007 5 months ago
@FreePizza007 yea I know. For every action, there's a reaction. I've only been working with electrolysis for about 2 months.
I assume the antifreeze components would remain in the cell. And only have to add electrolyte. Much the same as a car battery. Hmm It's a hurdle I'll cross when I get to it. It won't be long and it'll be freezing temps.
Thanks
a2zhandi 5 months ago
why the film looks so old, like in the 90s.
MiamiHEATnow 6 months ago
Thank you my friend.
Did you know you can make your own hydride out of carbonized chicken feathers? Yup, cheep and easy. I've tested it and it works very well.
Also, there are much better cathode materials than platinum.
Peace.
Mike.
mikepowers420 6 months ago
@mikepowers420 care to share?
a2zhandi 5 months ago
sell this shit on the black market or give it to the people give them the knowledge to take out these stupid ass gas companies lets do it people if big gas companies know who you are and your trying to sell this out they will take your ass out !
xkyutelaogrlx 6 months ago
Great Vid, but the title shouldn't be Run your car on water, as it is not really describing what is happening here...Run your car on Hydrogen would be more accurate...
MichaelHGoebel 6 months ago
Pseudointellectual bullshit.
Rick258442 6 months ago
@Rick258442 It never will cease to amaze me how angry a person can get because they can't understand something.
This video is great, it shows someone that truly understands how to make a workable system to run a car on hydrogen.
x65535x 6 months ago
@x65535x They want you to think you have to be a quantum physicist before you can come up with something like this.There are hundreds of videos that show you only have to be a below average redneck.
Rick258442 6 months ago
@Rick258442
This video shows a man that has physics and chemistry knowledge that allowed him to use natural energy sources and store it in his car. Converting energy from one form to another to transport him.
The "rednecks" on youtube as you say are just very confused people that "think" they know what they are doing, they are also either lying or are confused on how to do math.
x65535x 6 months ago
Stupid geeks. This is so much easier than they make it seem. This video is bullshit.
Rick258442 6 months ago
are those nos tanks
mike081283 7 months ago
right there abouts if you dont include the price of the tesla tune coil up and running in the background????
davetherooster1969 7 months ago
Comment removed
xtamared 7 months ago
but how cost this system? 30,000 dlls?
SpeedMetal4635 7 months ago
Well, if people drove cars such as Toyota Prius instead of Chevrolet Corvette there would be less need for gasoline or hydrogen!
AlemitoFilms 7 months ago
@AlemitoFilms you kind of missed the point there i think mate
greyandme2 7 months ago
I think it's time we all approach congress on these issues of obtaining these materials for energy production purposes on a mass scale so we can officially rid our dependence on foreign oil. We are supposed to be a free society with rights... Our government / country is so slow to respond to our concerns and our ideas to fix these problems. If we can get these idiots in office to wake up and stop being greedy and let us get it done.. I am game. lets get going and do this. LET THEM TAKE NOTE
jasonharville1 7 months ago
@jasonharville1 lol you wont be allowed to.the oil industry controles your senate, and untill ALL the oil is gone your not gonna get any renewable energy sources.cos if you get your cheap energy then the oil barons dont get your money.
jmpmcd 7 months ago
ok i got some question..i dont get it...
what particle are u smashing in your "particle accelerator" lol
and how can u get Lithium hydroxide out of doing it ?
that sound hard=P
And u dont need this material to make hydrogen, its just make the process quicker? or what do u mean, i dont understand how(quote) u stor hydrogen more effificently and safely?? i think u hold alot of infromation to your self....
rofl
and yea when i say u(you) i mean him to uber cool guy...
Mutubeish 8 months ago
yea i almost forgat; its helerious that u r allowed to build a particle accelerator in usa
ROFL
Mutubeish 8 months ago
@Mutubeish i think he was saying sommething like . the hydride in the tanks. is what he needs the particle accelerator for just the hydride or something in side the molecules of the hydride? they have to hold the information for them selves if they didnt then people would either try and make it themselves and blow them selfs up and maybe the whole world governmets cant really be expected to look after the welfare of its people while at the same time let them mess around with this kinda stuff
greyandme2 7 months ago
@greyandme2 yea thats true (=
Mutubeish 7 months ago
gawd the non scientist is an idiot!
jjunit207 8 months ago
@jjunit207 why? what do u mean, hes just asking dum questions so ppl that dont know how this work and are watching this will learn ...
Mutubeish 8 months ago
Let me alliviate some misconceptions. Hydride is not just one element, it is a term for a solid that can hold and store hydrogen. There are several hydrides either natural or in compounds. An example is Ammonia Borane (Compound) and Magnesium (Element). Both store hydrogen and release it under heat.
Phantasm911 8 months ago
i love it, just plug it in to your SOLAR panel like he does, turn on the water, and let it charge the tanks in your car OVER NIGHT for 8 hours. lol solar power at night roflmao.
PappyDan 8 months ago
Here in my back yard I have a partical accelerator built from the plans I got off the Ghostbusters website.If you fell for this it's time to retire the pipe.
yourfullofsheite 8 months ago
COVALENT ZERO producing from a tank of water, a NASA propulsion grade thruster...
YeOldClipper 8 months ago
7:55 Anyone else find this to be BS and a scam on our Gov. part, I know I sure do. Not available despite not being dangerous? That tells me the Gov. has known forever what these chemicals can be used for to "help" all of us, but obviously refuse to do it.
HostileHST 8 months ago
@HostileHST The word "government" means the agency or organization in place to facilitate societal well being. Even communists need their people to enslave them. But, here in this country, we have something other than government. It'