JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
<3 the Science Comedian guys is awesome. He reffers to his fans like: I can tell some watchers are science guys, because they listen to the joke, then decide it's scientifically sound and then nod like: 'Ok, go on Jester'
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST prevents macro-evolution. Natural selection wouldn't preserve the evolution of new traits because they wouldn't have any survival value. A partially-evolved hand evolving from a previous trait, partially-evolved tissues, organs, biological structures would make a species unfit for survival. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species. All species of plants and animals in the fossil record are complete and fully-formed. They came into existence as complete!
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: Recent research shows that these segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Random mutations, from radiation, are destructive. Even for every good one there would be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, causing harm and even extinction, not upward evolution. Genetic similarities are better explained due to a common design for common purposes.
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
HOW DOES DNA MAKE A BODY? When you divide a cake the parts are smaller than the original cake and the cake never gets bigger. When we were a cell and that cell divided, the new cells were the same size as the original cell and we got bigger. New material had to come from somewhere. That new material came from food. The sequence in our DNA directed our mother's food we received in the womb to become new cells forming all the tissues and organs of our body. Read my article: HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?
HUMAN EMBRYO doesn't have true gills or tail. These and other arguments have long been discarded by most evolutionists and not supported by any modern embryologist. Then, what are these structures? Read "Does The Human Embryo Go Through Animal Stages" at the Institute for Creation Research site. Briefly, what look like gills are early formation of facial and throat regions. What looks like a tail is the coccyx which grows faster than the rest of the body. The coccyx supports the pelvic muscles.
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
You know, it was actually Tesla that came up with the screw-in version of the lightbulb that we actually use, plus he came up with alternating current...
considering jesus died on a cross do you think hed want to see a bunch of crosses when he come back? thats be like going up to jackie o with a sniper rifle as a breast pin thank you bill hicks lol
@InfidelsUniverse definitely, deals in Absolutes....only religious people deal with absolutes, science and rational people do not, because when new evidence comes in to suggest something else it becomes updated
@Questionforatheists And don't belittle my beyond god-like knowledge with such a pathetic strawman, NO ONE SAID THEY SHOULD DIE, and the first question... if you cant easily answer that, then id say that there's a huge probability that your bus is shorter than the rest...
@Questionforatheists Its called education... we could stipulate reasons for them now, keeping it general and basic, but when they arrive to the age of reason, they'll not only better understand us, but be aable to learn for themselves. Maybe you should google questions before asking.
A question for atheists. In a world where there's no proof of God's existence or of life after death; how do you explain to your children why you brought them into the world and why they should die?
@QuestionForAtheists we brought them in this world to wage war on religion and they should die protecting science and rational thought from imbeciles like you
its clear that there is a got.and evolution is real.got creat us in his image so god is a monkey.clearly bible is f@ck up and only a monkey got can f@ck that up.
ScienceComedian failed. Are people still making the mistake Edison invented stuff instead of ripping off people that invented them? Please google "Nikolai Tesla"
the one in enthroned in heaven laughs.the lord scoffs at them Then he rebukes them in his anger and terrifies them in his wrath,SAYING i HAVE INSTALLED MY kING ON ZION MY HOLY HILL.
It was nice seeing Defender of Reason again She is sorely missed since she was forced to close her channel. Has any one mirrored other videos that she made?
@XXISimplicityXXI Yeah in part but mostly they just took a bunch of rival religions and demonized them, either known they where actually better religions beliefs and such than the Christians and Jews religion. The Judeochristian religion is a ball of shit rolled through a field and picked up so much shit that no one will ever know what it originally was. Simple truth.
I don't really appreciate the Flying Spaghetti monster being portrayed that way. He is an omnipotent being and being portrayed in the same video as such terrible fabrications as the invisible pink universe undermines all the good done in his name.
@yoko117 And yet you took the time to make this useless comment, wow, how strange, huh? Seriously, if you're gonna complain about wasted time, shut the fuck up.
IF IT MAKES YOU ALL FEEL BETTER PEOPLE ARE NOT REALLY RELIGIOUS, THEY JUST SAY THEY ARE BECAUSE IT'S JUST AN AFFILIATION. PROOF: MOST POLITICIANS CHEAT, LIE AND ARE GREEDY. IF THIS WAS TRULY A CHRISTAIN NATION THEN WHY DO WE HAVE SO MANY POOR PEOPLE AND VETS?!
@MRTEL7777 So very true. Look at Japan, officialy an atheist nation, but with the lowest level of crime per head of population that any other country in the developed world. The U.S on the other hand, the most religious of any country in the developed world - the highest murder and rape figures of any country. Go figure.
where our tax money goes to when the church uses it:to make a bigger gotdam cross on top of their gotdam church to reach the sky and act as a siring for jesus the drug addict
@ Aresftfun from an Australian yes we do have an atheist prime minister saddly when she announced this she lost a large percentage of her potential voting base and we look like having another conservative prime minster as a result so unfortunately I have to inform you that a great number of my compatriots are religitards
@chelseaF17 It's not all negative, some people find peace and stuff with it. I agree with arguing and defending Atheism like this, but I don't think it's right to just completely tear it down and call it bullshit.
It amazing me how blind they are to the amount of religious propaganda we as Atheist face every day. And the first video doesn't even bring up all the idioms in our language attributed to the good book.
I really want to laugh at that 3rd segment, but it's hard to laugh when you're about to cry.
We live in an age when we know more about the world than we ever did, but we still hold on to these superstitions. There's no hope. These people ARE actually going to destroy us.
i tried to believe in god, but believing made life seem pointless. It's like the new mercedes S-class. Radar cruise control, satnav, automatic parking - why am i even in the drivers seat?
lmao i love how in the second clip she's talking into the phone, but the chord leading to the wall jack is missing. you can even see the huge hole for the connection in the back.
@drche420 God is fact try reading the Bible. Why does my state put a warning about evolution being just a theory on the science books? OH WAIT cause it is JUST a theory.
"Why does my state put a warning about evolution being just a theory on the science books?"
Maybe because the people who did that don't know what a theory means in science? A hint: a scientific theory is not a wild guess or a hypothesis. Here's some other "just theories": the germ theory, atomic theory, the theory of gravitation etc.
@drche420 God is not a hypothesis, god is a universal negative, a completely un-testable myth. Hence why god/gods will always hide in the gaps of knowledge, the more we discover the further back gods hide, hopefully we will one day know enough to push back the dino myths once and for all.
@drche420 An excellent point, but scientifically, a theory is a fact that has not existed long enough to be called a law. God is not even a hypothesis, as the assumption that god exists is made before the testable ideas are formed.
Ok, first of all, a theory is not "a fact that has not existed long enough to be called a law".
Its not accurate. A fact is merely a claim or statement that can be tested for its validity, meaning a fact can be true or false. Also, "Laws" are also theories. If a hypothesis yeilds repeatable and predictable results under years of scrutiny, the majority of world's repected scientists would call the hypothesis a scientific theory.
@drche420 A scientific theory comprises a collection of concepts, including abstractions of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules (called scientific laws) that express relationships between observations of such concepts. A scientific theory is constructed to conform to available empirical data about such observations, and is put forth as a principle or body of principles for explaining a class of phenomena
@drche420 A scientific law or scientific principle is a concise verbal or mathematical statement of a relation that expresses a fundamental principle of science, like Newton's law of universal gravitation. A scientific law must always apply under the same conditions, and implies a causal relationship between its elements. The law must be confirmed and broadly agreed upon through the process of inductive reasoning.
Newsflash; there is no rigorous routine in which a theory undergoes to become a law except for time itself. Postulations and hypothesis that have held true test after test for hundreds of years are granted the title of "law". A theory that provides accurate results every time has just as much evidence in it's favor as a theory that has been deemed a law over time.
@drche420 Not really becouse the first criteria for a hypothesis is that it has to be able to be disproven :P cant disprove something that dosnt exist
The claim that god exists is testable. At least, the christian god. If you follow the bible teachings, sincerely praying to god to heal the wounded will result in divine intervention. Furthermore, if a religious person were to claim to have evidence to prove the existence of a god, then that evidence can be evaluated. Remember, we aren't out to disprove the existence of a god, we are out to disprove the claim that a god exists. Its easy when no evidence is ever provided.
Your all very influenced by Dawkins, who is a evolutionary biologist and doesn't know shit about theology, philosophy or religous scriptures. He is heavily criticized by today's Atheistic philosophers for being an Antitheist, just like all of you are, disrespecting and mocking all the people who do believe. Being an atheist means not believing in god, not going around and insult other people. Shame on you.
@BadBlueBoy213 " He is heavily criticized by today's Atheistic philosophers for being an Antitheist "
Actually Hitchens is the Antitheist, not Dawkins...
As far as disrespecting or mocking.. this is clearly labelled as satire, and satire is healthy in a free society.
As long as religions agree to stay out of government, stop persecuting homosexuals, stop molesting children, stop allowing superstition to interfere with science, etc etc
@Roper122 How is Dawkins not an antitheist? have you even read the "god delusion"? There are many reviews of it, and among them a lot of critics, look them up. Not even by religious people but also atheists or other philosophers.
This has been flagged as spam show
JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
GET READY FOR THE GREAT WARNING NOW!!!
thewarningsecondcoming . com
JezusSlave 2 months ago
Hey. Look at two minutes in. Her phone isn't plugged in. I'm just saying.
papoopadoo 3 months ago in playlist atheist comedy 3
That comedian isn't bad. What's his name? Has he been doing comedy for long?
PaladinHero 3 months ago
<3 the Science Comedian guys is awesome. He reffers to his fans like: I can tell some watchers are science guys, because they listen to the joke, then decide it's scientifically sound and then nod like: 'Ok, go on Jester'
Perfect description of me listening :)
Defhrone 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 4 months ago
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST prevents macro-evolution. Natural selection wouldn't preserve the evolution of new traits because they wouldn't have any survival value. A partially-evolved hand evolving from a previous trait, partially-evolved tissues, organs, biological structures would make a species unfit for survival. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species. All species of plants and animals in the fossil record are complete and fully-formed. They came into existence as complete!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: Recent research shows that these segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Random mutations, from radiation, are destructive. Even for every good one there would be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, causing harm and even extinction, not upward evolution. Genetic similarities are better explained due to a common design for common purposes.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HOW DOES DNA MAKE A BODY? When you divide a cake the parts are smaller than the original cake and the cake never gets bigger. When we were a cell and that cell divided, the new cells were the same size as the original cell and we got bigger. New material had to come from somewhere. That new material came from food. The sequence in our DNA directed our mother's food we received in the womb to become new cells forming all the tissues and organs of our body. Read my article: HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HUMAN EMBRYO doesn't have true gills or tail. These and other arguments have long been discarded by most evolutionists and not supported by any modern embryologist. Then, what are these structures? Read "Does The Human Embryo Go Through Animal Stages" at the Institute for Creation Research site. Briefly, what look like gills are early formation of facial and throat regions. What looks like a tail is the coccyx which grows faster than the rest of the body. The coccyx supports the pelvic muscles.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
"Ignorance is strength" Halla-fuckin-ulla
55metalmonkey 4 months ago
Funny . Love it !
justjulie37 5 months ago
You know, it was actually Tesla that came up with the screw-in version of the lightbulb that we actually use, plus he came up with alternating current...
LeaveLikeTheSane 5 months ago
It's not often you get to hear someone say "yes I did do the math for that joke".
dunbar9finger 5 months ago
Video 2 look like its going to be porn .
2naruto1 6 months ago
As I was watching this an ad for obtaining a bible degree popped up in the video. FML.
SonicADProductions 6 months ago
if you think and use reason, you will be an atheist...
StrongestJourney 6 months ago 34
@StrongestJourney i agree. i didn't think an additional thumbs up showed that enough, so i felt compelled to comment too :)
rayechayelle1 4 months ago
TREE MANN........watch?v=O5t160vC4rA
InfamousTrax 7 months ago
Video #2, I can't believe it's not porn.
ruddha2 7 months ago 13
Deadbeat christian fund 1800-555-GIVE Rofl! that's a good one!
BaphometXIV 7 months ago
somebody call Dana White. I want to see UFC 135 Mohammad the Tranny vs Jesus the Pedo
Keatelite 8 months ago
that dollar at 7:07 looks really fucking strange
TheWoodstock2009 8 months ago
>atheist
>humor
I seriously hope you guys don't do this.
scimath42 8 months ago
considering jesus died on a cross do you think hed want to see a bunch of crosses when he come back? thats be like going up to jackie o with a sniper rifle as a breast pin thank you bill hicks lol
coltsrule5150 9 months ago
the sign should say... "There's definitely no god"
InfidelsUniverse 9 months ago
@InfidelsUniverse definitely, deals in Absolutes....only religious people deal with absolutes, science and rational people do not, because when new evidence comes in to suggest something else it becomes updated
MadMAn12gauge 9 months ago
the owners own you
phildirt3 9 months ago
Bad acting, no comedic timing.
3SpaceCadet 9 months ago
@Questionforatheists And don't belittle my beyond god-like knowledge with such a pathetic strawman, NO ONE SAID THEY SHOULD DIE, and the first question... if you cant easily answer that, then id say that there's a huge probability that your bus is shorter than the rest...
buktomsin 9 months ago
@Questionforatheists Its called education... we could stipulate reasons for them now, keeping it general and basic, but when they arrive to the age of reason, they'll not only better understand us, but be aable to learn for themselves. Maybe you should google questions before asking.
buktomsin 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A question for atheists. In a world where there's no proof of God's existence or of life after death; how do you explain to your children why you brought them into the world and why they should die?
QuestionForAtheists 9 months ago in playlist Religion (funny)
@QuestionForAtheists we brought them in this world to wage war on religion and they should die protecting science and rational thought from imbeciles like you
sagar246246 7 months ago
@sagar246246 and then what?
QuestionForAtheists 7 months ago
@QuestionForAtheists a world without religion and the senseless killing and feeling of superiority that comes with it
also, we'll get of those religious assholes who wish to sent us all back to the dark ages
sagar246246 7 months ago
its clear that there is a got.and evolution is real.got creat us in his image so god is a monkey.clearly bible is f@ck up and only a monkey got can f@ck that up.
skit1009 10 months ago
cool must see facebook trick /watch?v=Fd0di5HFboY
Lawcewicz 10 months ago
great little facebook trick /watch?v=Fd0di5HFboY
NicoleCouri 10 months ago
INVISIBLE PINK UNICORN WINS!!! :D
PunkZombie1300 10 months ago
rate. funyyyyyy
comment. hahahahahahahaha :)
dogsofwarclan 10 months ago
light speed joke for the win lmao
Mystro1989 10 months ago
Why's the invisible pink unicorn visible?
dan012345 10 months ago
@dan012345
The Invisible Pink Unicorn works in mysterious ways.
LordQuixote 10 months ago
@LordQuixote Ah, ways in which we cannot comprehend.
dan012345 10 months ago
ScienceComedian failed. Are people still making the mistake Edison invented stuff instead of ripping off people that invented them? Please google "Nikolai Tesla"
Tw1St3DSt33L 11 months ago 2
you uploaded this on my bday,can't wait for this year to see all the christians be embarrassed about may 21 XD.HADOKEN!!!
TheDarkHadoken 11 months ago
The world will be so malleable after it turns secular, can't wait.
WisenedGnome 1 year ago
I'd rather live with those whose faith might be false than under a secular dictatorship
aznkeng890 1 year ago
@aznkeng890 I'm not too keen of a secular dictatorship but the Taliban are devout believers and I certainly don't want them running the country.
BlueAvantiGuy 1 year ago
fuck thomas eddison
hector9462 1 year ago
i liked the fkn nwz thing really =)
iEmpyrea 1 year ago
What about Edward Current? He's funny!
1ND1G0O 1 year ago 2
this is not funny...
hahaha01357 1 year ago
see "was Jesus good man or mad man"
rationalatheist100 1 year ago
ha ha! "responsibilify"
xander55577 1 year ago
he who laughs last laughs best
the one in enthroned in heaven laughs.the lord scoffs at them Then he rebukes them in his anger and terrifies them in his wrath,SAYING i HAVE INSTALLED MY kING ON ZION MY HOLY HILL.
MrNewkingjames 1 year ago
@MrNewkingjames You can keep your hill, the future is ours.
WisenedGnome 1 year ago
In the nuclear age, where billions may die at the press of a few buttons, thank God atheists rule the world.
Armando2012102 1 year ago
It was nice seeing Defender of Reason again She is sorely missed since she was forced to close her channel. Has any one mirrored other videos that she made?
TheKilgoretrout 1 year ago
deek!!!!
MrROTD 1 year ago
When he held up the dollar in the first clip, I thought he was starting to whistle the Imperial March.
ZeDingoBlag 1 year ago
How did we even got Satanism, just a part of Christianity
XXISimplicityXXI 1 year ago
@XXISimplicityXXI Yeah in part but mostly they just took a bunch of rival religions and demonized them, either known they where actually better religions beliefs and such than the Christians and Jews religion. The Judeochristian religion is a ball of shit rolled through a field and picked up so much shit that no one will ever know what it originally was. Simple truth.
WisenedGnome 1 year ago
ty god for cancer
lightitupfool 1 year ago
The first cartoon is the best in this collection. Not because it's funny but because it's worryingly true!!
maskofsan1ty 1 year ago 3
This is the BEST of atheist comedy?
No wonder, considering that Atheists are sworn rationalists. :-)
Just kidding... but there ARE better atheist comedians out there, so I guess these might be the best ones who agreed to contribute to this video...
42317 1 year ago
OMG WE NEED TO PAY $1 A MONTH FOR SHAWN!!! IT BROKE MY HEART
Unknnnnn 1 year ago
Heh, that last one was goooood.
Xunkun 1 year ago
THE FKN NEWZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mrgimp420 1 year ago
I miss Defender of Reason :(
steveb0503 1 year ago
Sheep say baah, maaah--that's goats.
warrenb0 1 year ago
Ok...that was funny
Nexus974 1 year ago
Anyone else get the Ads by Google for Bible Software while watching this?? lol
bekahleigh5478 1 year ago
Good shit.
Spherical3 1 year ago
I don't really appreciate the Flying Spaghetti monster being portrayed that way. He is an omnipotent being and being portrayed in the same video as such terrible fabrications as the invisible pink universe undermines all the good done in his name.
bbchbbd 1 year ago 94
@bbchbbd Ramen!!!
chimmencrob 9 months ago
@bbchbbd Ramen!
ReX342 6 months ago
What a boring video, my god. I would say it wasted my time, but that's such a large understatement why take the time.
yoko117 1 year ago
@yoko117 And yet you took the time to make this useless comment, wow, how strange, huh? Seriously, if you're gonna complain about wasted time, shut the fuck up.
DeathnoteBB 1 year ago
@yoko117 Why bother posting a comment?
Talamasca124 1 year ago
is that a weed plant in the background 3:00
darwinblessgogreen18 1 year ago
@PseudoPoiesis
Nice. Now I wish I had thought of that.
daddyrizla 1 year ago
"Now, how are we going to handle the YouTube community?"
(good luck with that!!)
rmcdaniel423 1 year ago
There's no god, the devil told me so.
daddyrizla 1 year ago 144
@daddyrizla "You know there ain't no Devil, that's just God when he's drunk." -Tom Waits
pirbird14 1 year ago 6
@daddyrizla
And the Flying Spagetti Monster confirmed it.
And Cthulu agreed.
Se1ander 1 year ago
@daddyrizla It would appear that the devil is quite the intelligent fellow.
MrCynix 1 year ago
@MrCynix and God probably knew that all along. Why couldnt he have had a stupid devil roam the earth?
isisdron 1 year ago
@daddyrizla Tom Waits said, Don't you know there ain't no devil, that's just god when he's drunk.
Kaalec 1 year ago 2
@Kaalec
God is the Body... the Devil is His favorite 180 proof Holy Spirit. God is the hammered. Satan is the Hammer.
ThotherBrother 1 year ago
@daddyrizla The devil is the father of all lies. Why wou you believe him? That loser thinks he's god anyways.
777jsca 1 year ago
@777jsca you don't get that it's just a satire, do you?
2Pains1Love 11 months ago
@daddyrizla there is no god, no1 would want to claim responsibility for this mess
sonicsoul0 11 months ago
"AND GOD TOLD ME.............."
desconocidos27 1 year ago
Hahaha!
AtheisticHappiness 1 year ago
As much as I hate religion, it wasn't funny...true, but not funny.
MrTheNewBEN 1 year ago 3
politics and religion aside, this wasn't that funny
Bergieberg28 1 year ago 3
IF IT MAKES YOU ALL FEEL BETTER PEOPLE ARE NOT REALLY RELIGIOUS, THEY JUST SAY THEY ARE BECAUSE IT'S JUST AN AFFILIATION. PROOF: MOST POLITICIANS CHEAT, LIE AND ARE GREEDY. IF THIS WAS TRULY A CHRISTAIN NATION THEN WHY DO WE HAVE SO MANY POOR PEOPLE AND VETS?!
MRTEL7777 1 year ago 3
@MRTEL7777 So very true. Look at Japan, officialy an atheist nation, but with the lowest level of crime per head of population that any other country in the developed world. The U.S on the other hand, the most religious of any country in the developed world - the highest murder and rape figures of any country. Go figure.
tafftastic 1 year ago 5
@tafftastic the statistics may be true... but are you sure Japan is an atheist nation... I guess Shinto is their official religion...
therockana 1 year ago
@therockana True it is, but I'd suggest Shinto is like Buddhism, in that its more of a spiritual 'thing' as oppossed to a religion.
tafftastic 1 year ago
where our tax money goes to when the church uses it:to make a bigger gotdam cross on top of their gotdam church to reach the sky and act as a siring for jesus the drug addict
zamrok73 1 year ago
@ Aresftfun from an Australian yes we do have an atheist prime minister saddly when she announced this she lost a large percentage of her potential voting base and we look like having another conservative prime minster as a result so unfortunately I have to inform you that a great number of my compatriots are religitards
gedd74 1 year ago
"We all have imaginary friends, but some of us grow out of ours"-Jimmy Carr XD
IMO Religion is just bullshit propaganda, used 2 control any1 stupid enough 2 believe it.
chelseaF17 1 year ago
@chelseaF17 It's not all negative, some people find peace and stuff with it. I agree with arguing and defending Atheism like this, but I don't think it's right to just completely tear it down and call it bullshit.
kristofor12345 1 year ago
christians are fools, clueless fools
ImperfectXistence 1 year ago 3
@ImperfectXistence hehe true!...but u forgot the other religions. ;)
iamvegeta2008 1 year ago
1:07 in god we trust.........everyone else pays cash !
bondsan 1 year ago
lol yeah VenomFangX sure sucked big time.
Texemosis 1 year ago
Australia has an atheistic um.....person. Dammit. I forgot what it's called. Oh yeah prime minister.
Aresftfun 1 year ago
I love that NWO news clip. What's it from?
Also, Indian dude looks like he's in some sort of cross between matrix and X-Files
NutNapalm 1 year ago
It amazing me how blind they are to the amount of religious propaganda we as Atheist face every day. And the first video doesn't even bring up all the idioms in our language attributed to the good book.
Hobagification 1 year ago
I really want to laugh at that 3rd segment, but it's hard to laugh when you're about to cry.
We live in an age when we know more about the world than we ever did, but we still hold on to these superstitions. There's no hope. These people ARE actually going to destroy us.
gloomilyeuphoric 1 year ago
@gloomilyeuphoric No hope? Religion has been around since the dawn o man. Someone's a pessimist
Distpg7 1 year ago
i tried to believe in god, but believing made life seem pointless. It's like the new mercedes S-class. Radar cruise control, satnav, automatic parking - why am i even in the drivers seat?
andrewsurtees 1 year ago
lmao i love how in the second clip she's talking into the phone, but the chord leading to the wall jack is missing. you can even see the huge hole for the connection in the back.
Juxtaroberto 1 year ago
"the christian deadbeats fund" ahahahh
BillKiernan 1 year ago
If evolution is just a theory, then god is just a hypothesis.
drche420 1 year ago 288
@drche420
A hypothesis makes a testable prediction.
God's a conjecture.
rkyeun 1 year ago 2
@drche420 God is fact try reading the Bible. Why does my state put a warning about evolution being just a theory on the science books? OH WAIT cause it is JUST a theory.
athiestsbane 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@athiestsbane
You = #LOL + #FAIL
drche420 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@athiestsbane "God is fact try reading the Bible."
Circular logic.
"Why does my state put a warning about evolution being just a theory on the science books?"
Maybe because the people who did that don't know what a theory means in science? A hint: a scientific theory is not a wild guess or a hypothesis. Here's some other "just theories": the germ theory, atomic theory, the theory of gravitation etc.
byteresistor 1 year ago
@drche420 not even a hypothesis. You have to have a reason for a hypothesis. There is no reason.
Disanidi 1 year ago
@Disanidi
My apologies, you are correct.
drche420 1 year ago
@drche420 Yes! Finally! I always wanted to be that. :) Thank you.
Disanidi 1 year ago
@drche420 God isn't even a hypothesis. A hypothesis can be disproved. :)
flippedphilosopher 1 year ago 3
@drche420 God is not a hypothesis, god is a universal negative, a completely un-testable myth. Hence why god/gods will always hide in the gaps of knowledge, the more we discover the further back gods hide, hopefully we will one day know enough to push back the dino myths once and for all.
vikeyev1 1 year ago
@drche420 No, god is just a thought conjured by a man in his late 40s who is high on acid and is fucking a donkey in the ass.
dragonofthedarknight 1 year ago
@drche420
Love it! :-).
thisismymoniker 1 year ago
@drche420 AWESOME!!!
therockana 1 year ago
@drche420 good point
ssawatdee 1 year ago
@drche420 there is nothing intelligent about god
xmasterfunk 1 year ago
@xmasterfunk
Mainly because it doesn't exist. Something that doesn't exist can't have attributes.
drche420 1 year ago
@drche420 haha i meant the thought of god but yeah i agree lol
xmasterfunk 1 year ago
@drche420 theres no 'if' and 'then'. And it's barely a hypothesis.
xomiakas 1 year ago
@xomiakas
Kudos
drche420 1 year ago
@drche420 An excellent point, but scientifically, a theory is a fact that has not existed long enough to be called a law. God is not even a hypothesis, as the assumption that god exists is made before the testable ideas are formed.
WaterCoolerProphet 1 year ago
@WaterCoolerProphet
Ok, first of all, a theory is not "a fact that has not existed long enough to be called a law".
Its not accurate. A fact is merely a claim or statement that can be tested for its validity, meaning a fact can be true or false. Also, "Laws" are also theories. If a hypothesis yeilds repeatable and predictable results under years of scrutiny, the majority of world's repected scientists would call the hypothesis a scientific theory.
drche420 1 year ago 2
@drche420 A scientific theory comprises a collection of concepts, including abstractions of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules (called scientific laws) that express relationships between observations of such concepts. A scientific theory is constructed to conform to available empirical data about such observations, and is put forth as a principle or body of principles for explaining a class of phenomena
phoboskitty 1 year ago
@drche420 A scientific law or scientific principle is a concise verbal or mathematical statement of a relation that expresses a fundamental principle of science, like Newton's law of universal gravitation. A scientific law must always apply under the same conditions, and implies a causal relationship between its elements. The law must be confirmed and broadly agreed upon through the process of inductive reasoning.
phoboskitty 1 year ago
@phoboskitty
Newsflash; there is no rigorous routine in which a theory undergoes to become a law except for time itself. Postulations and hypothesis that have held true test after test for hundreds of years are granted the title of "law". A theory that provides accurate results every time has just as much evidence in it's favor as a theory that has been deemed a law over time.
drche420 11 months ago
@drche420 Not really becouse the first criteria for a hypothesis is that it has to be able to be disproven :P cant disprove something that dosnt exist
AtheistofMan 11 months ago
@AtheistofMan
The claim that god exists is testable. At least, the christian god. If you follow the bible teachings, sincerely praying to god to heal the wounded will result in divine intervention. Furthermore, if a religious person were to claim to have evidence to prove the existence of a god, then that evidence can be evaluated. Remember, we aren't out to disprove the existence of a god, we are out to disprove the claim that a god exists. Its easy when no evidence is ever provided.
drche420 10 months ago
responsibilification? hahaha
marktsheppard 1 year ago
Maaaaassssssses! Maaaaaaaasssssssses!
pannysat 1 year ago
Your all very influenced by Dawkins, who is a evolutionary biologist and doesn't know shit about theology, philosophy or religous scriptures. He is heavily criticized by today's Atheistic philosophers for being an Antitheist, just like all of you are, disrespecting and mocking all the people who do believe. Being an atheist means not believing in god, not going around and insult other people. Shame on you.
BadBlueBoy213 1 year ago
@BadBlueBoy213 " He is heavily criticized by today's Atheistic philosophers for being an Antitheist "
Actually Hitchens is the Antitheist, not Dawkins...
As far as disrespecting or mocking.. this is clearly labelled as satire, and satire is healthy in a free society.
As long as religions agree to stay out of government, stop persecuting homosexuals, stop molesting children, stop allowing superstition to interfere with science, etc etc
Then I'l stop mocking them.
Until then.. shame on you
Roper122 1 year ago
@Roper122 How is Dawkins not an antitheist? have you even read the "god delusion"? There are many reviews of it, and among them a lot of critics, look them up. Not even by religious people but also atheists or other philosophers.
BadBlueBoy213 1 yea