Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
This has been flagged as spam show
I agree that searching to source is what we want the dog to do. I do not agree with letting the dog mouth the odor. Only bad things can come from letting the dog do this. Im not trying to start an argument about this. I am expressing concern for what I see as being a potential training flaw. Hope that I did not bruise any egos. We are working for the same cause - keeping our country safe! God Bless.
frogman1998 2 years ago
Comment removed
frogman1998 2 years ago
to frogman it is the expectation that he does not get paid until he reaches source. dog has to work to source , odor is clue to source if you pay the dog for reaching source everytime in training , in real life scenarios he believes he can reach source no mistake in indication, it works sweet after oral game you work puzzles
shelly9685 3 years ago
Why would you want an oral response as an indication from a detection dog? I can't think of an instance where it would be used.
Certainly a dog searching for narcotics would not use this as an indication. I need some clarification on this please.
frogman1998 3 years ago