for once he said something true and im not surprised he understands it. His job basically requires knowledge of human brain and how it works so he can get elected. I hate this guy but this time he got it right on the money. However being able to do something and HAVING to do something because he doesn't think you SHOULD do it are 2 different things.
I like Pepsi more then Coke, should i 'Un-Acquire' my taste for pepsi?
im not gay, but i dont understand why they need to care so much about this stuff, just let it be normal and live with it, Gay Pride festivals tho, They are horrible shows of gay people, the ones who join that parade, you are part of the reason people dont want to understand you... please be "normal" gay or straight doesnt matter but you dont see us going around groping boobies on the streets once a year now do you?
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
"New Prediction From Pat Roberston"....There will be a great Unicorn galloping upon a rainbow..Riding it's back will be a huge Toad covered in skittles flavored warts and out of his mouth you will hear in a loud thunderous voice saying........ "TASTE THE RAINBOW" !!
I don't know if it has to do with genes or hormones or what, but I do know that it has to do with the hypothalamus, which is an ancient part of the brain that is not easy to access. So please, Mr. I-don't-know-what-I'm-talking-about, tell us how to modify and control the hypothalamus's responses to estrogen and testosterone.
I'm sorry but mob mentality is not how the American government works. You live in a republic that was designed to promote domestic tranquility and the general welfare. You aren't going to get that by badgering people into leaving their religions. Secular government is a provider of religious freedom and THAT is why it is a good thing. Atheism and secular government not the same. Atheism only your personal choice. That statement was ignorant.
@Kooshkff Who said anything about badgering people to leave their religions or that atheism is the same thing as secularism? I never did. Like you said, a secular government provides for religious freedom. You're implying that I'm making a connection that I'm not making.
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
@Gregorypeckory Have you noticed that the same people who call themselves liberal are against teaching religion in school? well then how can they complain if there are ignorant religious people? The majority if them have never read Leviticus and probably never will. A mandatory highshool comparative Religion course would do the world some good. It doesnt have to replace science. ( and yes im on a tangent )
"Have you noticed that the same people who call themselves liberal are against teaching religion in school?"
So, you support teaching children the Islam religion, Buddhism religion, Mormon religion, Scientology religion, faithist religion, etc? There are hundreds of different religions, so which one should be teach?
Wouldn't be easier to just let the parents chose what religion they want to teach their children? Let the parents teach their kids at home what ever they want.
"Wouldn't be easier to just let the parents chose what religion they want to teach their children?"
That obviously doesn't work. There is nothing wrong with educating children about other religions and cultures. I'm not saying to teach it as if it is truth. I'm talking about making theology mandatory. Religion is a big part of the world, like it or not. It is ignorant to ignore it.
@Kooshkff Chinese Mandarin is the most common language in the world. And yet, schools in the US usually have French, Spanish and German but not Chinese Mandarin. Movies are a huge part of our culture. But there is no class about movies. Dating is a huge part of any culture. No class on that either. We focus on the important stuff.
That is irrelevant really. There is no need to for American students to learn Chinese.
Also, Movies and dating do not need to be taught, they are leisure activities.
There is a need for people to be educated about religion. The majority of people on this channel are complaining about 'ignorant religious people' but when it comes time for a solution it falls on deaf ears. In Germany they teach religious tolerance to students, why can't they do that in America?
@Gregorypeckory The solution to this problem is simple. People need to be educated about religion. Homoseexuals are a minority, and it is their rights that are being questioned. In a functioning democracy if everyone believes the anti-gay interpretation of Leviticus then the religious will be anti-gay. in that sense antitheists and fundies alike are the problem. They are both taking that verse out of context.
@katimere2 I think I might have seen you in downtown San Francisco, with a "God Hates Fags" sandwich sign. Good luck with your bible thumping, but I think I'll take a pass, as tempting as it is to change my beliefs in response to a disturbed individual typing in all caps, for the second half of your childish diatribe. For good health, I'll continue staying away from pigs and crabs, but also fanatic nutcases, such as you.
@Gregorypeckory No you have not seen me at your Gay Parade. But then again you might have been too busy bent over getting shit pushed up in your ass to notice anything but dick and balls. So please continue to stay away from FANATIC NUTCASES SUCH AS MYSELF.
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
No one ever wonders why there is so much BPA ( high estrogen levels) IN ALL OUR PRODUCTS causing females to go into puberty sooner, higher rates of breast cancer. Testosterone deficiency is related to imbalances in the mother's system while caring male children leading to effeminate males thus DING DING HOMOSEXUALS. The elite know what they are doing if people are too busy screwing the same sex they won't be out there making babies.
You un-acquire something by changing your thoughts about it. A huge amount of our thought processes are based on cultural and environmental circumstances. For example, studies have shown that boys with multiple older brothers are more likely to be attracted to men. Is this genetic? No, it's environmental. Until science discovers a "gay gene" being "born gay" is simply a theory.
@rhadiem I guess being born heterosexual must be a theory too because science hasn't discovered the hetero gene either. if sexuality was as simple as changing your thought process (or choice as it's also known) then the default setting for human sexuality would be bi-sexual or a-sexual.
@UnexpectedWonder Way to miss the point. As for 'immoral lifestyles', is there a gene for morality too? Morality is subjective and as such varies from person to person and culture to culture. There is no fixed morality for anyone. Even religious types like to pick and choose what piques their moral conscience. Gays bad! Liars, adulterers and the covetous not so much... and which one isn't featured in the top 10 of gods what-not-to-do list?
Don't believe the homosexual communities propaganda that they were " born that way " This is pure nonsense. If you want to change your sexual orientation, you can through faith in jesus.
@polowres So you believe in a nonsense story of existance of a mythical person who wasn't born due to a sexual contact but don't believe in the role of genetics and DNA in someone's sexual orientation. Ask your close friends to help you pull your head out of your ass.
@graphicsociety1 Jesus did exist, its in the bible. If you don't believe in the bible I suggest you look in a history textbook. God Bless! (not sarcasm)
If homosexuals are "born that way", then pedophiles are "born that way" too. If the Young Turds are going to argue that all humans are slaves to their genes, then it would be a logical fallacy to claim that one is and the other isn't. Paving the way for the next abomination ... legalized pedophilia.
@MaryWaterton You cannot compare stealing the innocence of a child through rape to two consenting adults that are unable to biologically feel for the opposite sex.
The more bigoted dinosaurs like Pat Robertson open their pie holes and spew such hateful nonsense, the faster that Christianity will evolve to be viewed as a mental illness. Ironically, the good news for Pat Robertson and his deluded followers is that religion, unlike sexual identity, may be, in fact, possible to deprogram or "unacquire".
There's a reason I systematically went through every category on Redtube when I first tried porn. I knew even back then people were wired to have different fetishes and there's no realistic way to "predict" what you will and will not like. I say if you're attracted to people the same gender as you, by all means date people the same gender. It's not like you're actually hurting anyone, except the nosy idiots who think they have the right to control each other's lives.
Pat Robertson; the same ignorant, rich, Fuck head who didn't know what Mac and cheese was. He thought it was a "black thing" I hate that fucker. I hope someone knocks his tiny fairy dust balls off.
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which famous atheist Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which famous atheist Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
Doesn't anyone remember the story of Pat Robertsons "blood diamond mine"? He made millions of dollars on this opperation in Africa. In a seperate story about child slavery it was reported; this area is known as a place where children are sold as sex slaves. Has any of the main stream media bothered to follow him there to see what little boys he's been purchasing? Does this sick pervert have a luxury rape house to ply his craft? Do he and Limbaugh have little boys together in Dominica?
The best thing Pat said in that clip was "I don't know" cause that's right Pat you don't know. Get your shit together you old cocksucker...probably literally.
@SocialDissimulation You referred to the behavior as attention seeking, and I gave you the opportunity to help me understand the logic that you would come to, to view it as wanted attention. If I were to use your example, the woman would have to sleep with a black man just so she can be ostracized. As your prior statement, it makes no sense.
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which famous atheist Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
@katimere2 Yes woman who cannot bear children herself or any man who cannot produce an ample amount of sperm to have a child is immoral in their very existence because they must pay.
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which famous atheist Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
Im gay, 26 and started being with men properly at age 18 or 19 up until this year. I dont believe I was born gay but through experiences I completely lost my attraction to females. I try not to lead a gay life any more and dont really care if I was or wasnt born gay. I know its not moral for me to be with a man sexually. From my experience, it pushes me away from God. Its not social conditioning or anything else. I was always supported in being gay and thought that God would be ok with it..
@WillsM85 Maybe you are bi-sexual. Bi-sexuals are sometimes more attracted to one sex than the other, or they can just be deeply in love with a specific person and don't care about their sex. If you have to try to not act on wanting to be with a man, you still have the attraction to men. Why do you feel it's not moral for you? I can't tell you how to live though. I am a little puzzled by your saying it pushes you away from God, but God would be okay with it.
@WillsM85 why would god have a problem with sexuality? that statement really bothers me. do you believe that in the eyes of god a man who has a loving relationship with another man is somehow morally corrupt in comparison to a man who has a relationship with a woman?
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which famous atheist Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexuality and homosexuality. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have successfully framed themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate than the word "gay" because it actually describes the behavior/relationship being discussed.
@Meatbag211 really? elton john? is he really happy with his life? he's an entertainer of course his handlers will glamorize his life. let's look at other examples... george michael--arrested several times and has addiction problems, need i say more?
@Firequacker The stars, gay and straight, have problems which are always out in the public eye, like their careers. Oh well. It has nothing to do with being gay or being straight.
It seems like most non religious arguments against homosexuality hover around 'its gross'. Course, that very argument can be used against the idea of ones own parents having intercourse.
@Meatbag211 Non-religious arguments? I think you're confusing faith and religion. They are, in fact, very easy to separate, and religion is often very presumptuous and harmful to society. Faith is finding your path into the greatest good, and homosexuality simply is NOT the path to the greatest good. Nothing else to be said about it, it is not the way.
@Meatbag211 numbers 31:17-18 certainly does not encourage pedophilia. Killing the men and integrating the undefiled woman and young girls into your society Is hardly encouraging pedophilia. The men only would have grown strong and fought against them again.
WHY IS THE CONCEPT OF HOW WE ALL GOT HERE SO DISTURBING TO HOMOSEXUALS. EXCEPT FOR TEST TUBE BABIES WHO ALSO USE BOTH MALE AND FEMALE TO CREATE THE CHILD. HETEROSEXUALS HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH EVERYONE BEING LIKE THEM, BUT HOMOSEXUALS EVEN KNOW THEIR LIFESTYLE IS COUNTER PRODUCTIVE TO LIFE ITSELF. Everyone can't love the same sex it makes no sense.
@katimere2 " Everyone can't love the same sex it makes no sense."
Everyone doesn't love the same sex. Only some people love the same sex. There, I made sense of it for you. I would also suggest reading about kin selection. It shows how non-breeding folks are still beneficial to societal structures.
@katimere2 Most heterosexuals don't care that not everyone is like them. No one is saying everyone needs to like the same sex. Any pregnancy that is planned, is counter-productive to unplanned or compulsive pregnancy. Sexual intercourse between a male and female may lead to unplanned pregnancy. That is not the only way to create life, and it's not morally superior. So what really is your point?
@dexterxyz How is homosexuality morally equivalent to heterosexuality? You must establish at least partial dominance over a man, which makes his confidence in some situations brittle. He breaks his peace for his partner. A woman never breaks her peace for her man, they work in unison with the sexual temperaments they were born with, man and woman.
@Firequacker You're worried a man will submit to a man, but a woman will not submit in her relationship with a man? One could just as easily, depending on their perspective, say a male and male relationship is more equal. It really depends on the relationship, not the sexes.
@dexterxyz A woman should submit to a man in a relationship because she is weaker.. A relationship is not meant to be 'equal,' it is meant to fulfill biological and sociological needs. We do not all need to be treated equally, otherwise our pasts would mean nothing and existence would be a purgatory. And, actually, considering our entire genome is geared to sexual polarity, it DOES depend on the sexes. You, sir, have confirmation bias for penis in your rectum.. and some good blinders, to boot.
@Firequacker You say a woman should submit to a man because she is weaker? Which hillbilly time warp are you living in? Good luck with that. You're the one with the blinders. You have no idea what I do in bed, nor anyone else whether gay or straight.
@dexterxyz In a stable, healthy, honest relationship, the man is the dominant figure. Weaker doesn't mean incapable, it means not as strong. Men are more capable of strength, more capable of resilience, more capable of intellectualizing. Men are the ones that perform the sex acts. They are to be submitted to.. This isn't hillbillyism. It's just natural progression from nonhuman to human, we ended up this way.
@Firequacker Weakness is a fickle word subject to the person in question. Women are weaker in what aspect? Physically? I know of plenty women who are stronger than me and you.
Mentally? More women possess PHDs than men.
Physically many men only have the advantage over women if they exercise.
Capability to intellectualize isnt inherent in a gender. I encourage you to study the Tabula Rasa concept.
@dexterxyz Sex is not the only way to produce a baby. That being said it is the morally superior way to have children. My point is homosexuality is non productive for the creation of life. TEST TUBE BABIES ARE NOT THE NORM.
@katimere2 Why is it morally superior? Every pregnancy a gay person has is planned. When being careless, penis in vagina may lead to unplanned, unwanted, accidental pregnancy. So what makes it so morally superior?
@dexterxyz Now you just proved how stupid you really are. GAY PEOPLE NATURALLY (MORALLY) CAN NOT HAVE CHILDREN BUT HETEROSEXUAL PEOPLE CAN WEATHER THEY ARE PLANNING TO OR NOT. So I ask you if it was not for modern technology via adoption or some fool willing to give you a child HOW ELSE CAN YOU REPRODUCE HUMAN KIND?
@katimere2 What you put in caps is what I said, minus the attaching morality to nature fallacy. Every pregnancy a gay person is involved in, is planned. That's not always true for heterosexuals. Reproduction happens in all cases. What makes the most planned pregnancies/reproduction less moral?
@dexterxyz Reproduction DOES NOT happen in THE CASE OF BEING A HOMOSEXUAL. SORRY DOESN'T HAPPEN. I CAN SAY I AM A HETEROSEXUAL AND EVERYONE SHOULD BE ONE. CAN HOMOSEXUALS SAY THE SAME? Well maybe they can though I think there would be no one left on the planet.
@katimere2 Why should everyone be heterosexual? The only thing you mention is reproduction. That's not enough. There needs to be a genuine attraction(orientation), pleasure and love. There is so much more to sexuality than reproduction. Are you only heterosexual for the reproduction? Gays could do that too, imagining someone else as they insert the genitals(or be inserted), if all you that matters is a certain type of reproduction. This doesn't make for a good, moral relationship.
@katimere2 How about developing loving, caring relationships and having wanted, loved children. How does the fact that a penis went into a vagina produce a moral standard which is higher than a different form of insemination/reproduction?
@dexterxyz You gays are too funny. If you morally have to pay to get a baby than you are open to corruption. Morally - .adhering to conventionally accepted standards of conduct. YES MORALLY SEX IS ACCEPTABLE MORAL WAY TO HAVE CHILDREN. You can get genetically modified food if you want to BUT NATURALLY GROWN FOOD WITHOUT SCIENCE MANIPULATING GENES IS BEST, ALL WOULD AGREE TO THAT. Except someone who may be brain dead,drug induced or HOMOSEXUAL?????
@Meatbag211 Pedophiles ,Zoophiles and Gays have a problem. They have unnatral attractions. The same as a Pyromaniac experiencing euphoria after starting fires. The good thing is there is help for them all if they want it.
@chestveeg "Gays have a problem. They have unnatral attractions."
You keep saying that, but you don't actually say why it's unnatural or why it's a problem.
If the answer you are unwilling to say is "the bible says so", then is the help you keep bringing up the death penalty? Because that's what the bible's punishment is for homosexuals. Interestingly, it actually encourages pedophilia, such as Numbers 31:17-18.
@47f0 Pedophiles,Zoophiles and Homosexuals all have the same problem. The upside is that there is help for them if they want it. Sadly many of them brainwash themselves into thinking that their affections are ok.
@chestveeg No one is arguing for Pedophilia or Beastiality, because for them to carry out their desires would involve harming the other party or having sex without consent. Make a case why homosexuality isn't like a person finding tattoos attractive. We don't try to treat men who date tattoo'd women, do we? Because in that case, no harm is involved and consent is given.
@Meatbag211 I certainly think that an attraction to material, a lust not related to love, is something that should be offered help. I do not treat gay men, I offer them advice on a few youtube videos when I come across ridiculous assertions and all that jazz. It IS like finding tattoos attractive, it is a lust unrelated to love. We should all live our lives purely in love. You are much more capable, as a man, than submitting to another man.
@shittyfagg Well from a scientific standpoint, it beats the hell out of simply saying meh and forgetting about a lot of the bad stuff out there like a lot of people do, and perhaps in the time that one gives it in prayer the person will think about it just long enough to come up with a solution, whether or not it is a solution given to the person by god, it's still a solution, and you can't deny solutions to problems are always a good thing.
@Meatbag211 Well first off I know its not totally corrupt given my connections. As for how corrupt it may be, I don't know, just like I don't know how corrupt our own government is, all I can do is have faith.Sometimes faith is rewarded, other times of course it isn't, just look at all faith people put in Obama,and how horribly he has disappointed us.Such failures of faith can be devastating,that's why the amount of people who say they aren't going to vote this next election is higher than ever.
@DEATHBYFLYINGCDS - Please. Putting your faith in President Obama is exactly why faith is an awful way to do things. At best, it's simply a warm fuzzy security blanket that does nothing. At worst, you'll make faulty decisions. BTW - I had zero "faith" in Obama, which is why I voted for him and will again. I researched him at the Library of Congress, liked what I saw there, ignored campaign rhetoric, and got, I think, a pretty competent administrator. Not a faith-based messiah.
@SocialDissimulation It's semantics to argue over whether or not seeking attention is the sole reason or a reason someone is gay. If you are offering that as a theory, the onus is on you to provide evidence or I'm calling bs. Homosexual orientation involves more than behaviour. So gays aren't a minority because of behaviour. Your example of the thug wanting attention is a diversion. Prove that applies to gays. Sexuality may or may not be benign, depending on the issue.
@dexterxyz Do you seriously not have the capacity to read? I have said over five times now to several different people: I AM NOT SAYING IT IS THE SOLE REASON. You're creating a straw dragon, and you're not the first. I was saying that the majority of new 'gays' do a lot of it for the attention accrued. It's just a guess, I never said it was fact or even evidenced, but I am making the claim that it's not being looked into to avoid hurting feelings. Press 1 for "I understand", 2 for don't.
@dexterxyz Clearly you misinterpreted my point, but I digress. I can't even begin to start debating with a person who cannot be honest. You're clearly trying to stave the conversation rather than add to it so I must say to you have a nice life.
@SocialDissimulation You can't debate this because you "guessed" up a possible theory with no reason(diversion subjects like your example of the thug don't count) or evidence. We can't absolutely prove that anything is impossible, we can't prove a negative. I'm sorry, but that's not good enough to warrant giving your theory any consideration.
@dexterxyz 1. Are you saying that people have not exhibited homosexual behavior for attention? 2. If so, then what would convince you? 3. The road has not been traveled to avoid hurting someone's sensibility, because people would rather coddle that population than even give the -perception- of being bigoted. There is plenty of evidence to suggest that there are plenty environmental factors that go into homosexuality, just as many as pedophilia.
@SocialDissimulation Gay and lesbian sexual orientation isn't just about behaviour. No one is gay and no one acts gay for attention. You assume there is a road to travel in this regard. Where is the reason and evidence to support your assumption? We don't know what the environmental factors are for being gay, nor how many. Citing early environmental factors as a possibility combined with genetics does not mean one is gay for attention.
@dexterxyz First and foremost, you are completely oblivious to sexual behavior. People can do anything to attain attention, and there are -plenty- of people who perform sexual acts on others not because of attraction but: vengeance, attention and even spite. To just sit there with arms folded saying no, no possible way that people do things for attention is not only disingenuous to begin with, it's downright stupid. Not sure if retarded or trolling.
@SocialDissimulation You speak in the broadest overly-generalized terms of "people" performing sexual acts(or behaviours) on others for "vengeance, attention and even spite". You haven't given a shred of evidence or reason to show that any of this is associated with homosexuality, because there isn't any. It is you who is ignorant and trolling.
@dexterxyz (cont) Homosexuality has been studied and not shown to be associated with attention-seeking or any of those other things. Simply because certain other things have been shown to be associated, does not mean homosexuality is. It does not mean homosexuality has an association to any behaviour you can think up. There isn't a conspiracy to suppress the knowledge you haven't given us reason to believe even exists.
@dexterxyz SO let me get this straight: all other sexual behaviors never, at any point, apply themselves to homosexuality? The level of stupidity is astounding. Really, I have never seen someone contort themselves so badly to save face in an argument. I hope you can walk after this lol.
@SocialDissimulation No strawman on my part. I was focused like a laser on the topic at hand: homosexuality. All you can seem to offer are diversions. Just because you can see attention-getting behaviour in one area, does not mean it applies to homosexuality/homosexual behaviour. There's no reason to suspect it would. It's not a choice. Being gay emerges in early adolescence with no sexual experience previously. Gays merely act on immutable most basic sexual nature.
@dexterxyz Focused like laser on such a broad topic? I think you ought to look at prisons before you make such bold assertions as to whether or not it's a choice. Your strawman is the continual iteration of: "but all homosexuality isn't attention-getting behavior". And that you completely avoid saying that homosexual sex can have other than loving connotations to avoid admitting that perhaps your rather weak psychoanalytical outlook on the behavior is a little marred makes me smile.
@SocialDissimulation Your very faulty, prisons analogy, isn't homosexuality. Those are heterosexuals substituting what they can access. This also doesn't prove an attention-getting behaviour.
@dexterxyz "Your very faulty,", "Those are heterosexuals substituting what they can access." So as long as I'm attracted to the feminine characteristics that makes me straight? Man oh man, this is definitely getting some blog space.
@dexterxyz So if I'm on a dry spell is it gay if I have sex with a male buddy of mine? No, because I'm just substituting? Jesus Christ that's a horrible argument. Dexterxyz just said that even if you have homosexual sex it's not homosexual because it's a substitution. LOL.
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which famous atheist Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
@lightandbeautiful so true. it is even ironic that homosexuals call themselves 'gay' when they are anything but gay--they live empty lives. that's basically what you end up when you choose to engage in the homosexual lifestyle--your life becomes empty and all you become concerned about is sexual gratification with the same sex.
@dexterxyz Oh, okay, let me get this straight. If HE doesn't claim to be gay, then none of his claims about homosexuality can be truth! Okay.
How do we know you're gay? Hm? How do we know this isn't just a habit of yours spawned from some sad incident, some sad realization you had that you couldn't handle the world as a straight man anymore? How do WE KNOW that YOU aren't pulling a fast one and taking a guess about your nature, then just riding with the feeling?
@Firequacker This is silly. He claimed to know the deeply personal experiences of gay men. I never claimed to be so familiar with the personal lives and feelings of straight men.
@dexterxyz I claim to know the deeply personal experiences of men transforming their lives. Gay men aren't living some incredibly deep, complex, 'you-had-to-be-there' problem. None of us are, unless we're working in a bureaucracy.
@Rated1804 pffft. celebrities. do you know them personally? can you attest that they are truly living happy lives? don't believe everything they show you on TV. if you personally know someone who is living the homosexual lifestyle, i am willing to bet they have plenty of problems.
@JOEtheHOTTIE no I do not know them personally, but can you attest that they are unhappy? I do personally know homosexuals who are very happy but you wouldn't believe me if I told you about them, I had to use celebs. Search Peron75 on Youtube he's a gay man who has been happily married for over 9 years.
Millions of people in the world have problems, not just homosexuals. What makes you think its only homosexuals?
@JOEtheHOTTIE "name one homosexual who is truly living a happy life. be honest. i dare you. name one. name just one." ... what a stupid question... I could also say "name one heterosexual who is truly living a happy life. be honest. i dare you. name one. name just one." and its an equally as valid question stupid
Pat Robertson is a man who speaks from experience!
whatsgoingon07 4 hours ago
for once he said something true and im not surprised he understands it. His job basically requires knowledge of human brain and how it works so he can get elected. I hate this guy but this time he got it right on the money. However being able to do something and HAVING to do something because he doesn't think you SHOULD do it are 2 different things.
dumbassmoron 10 hours ago
I'll help Pat Robertson un-acquire his facial features once I'm through with him.
2TJW 3 days ago
Pat should try to "un-acquire" his stupid.
Arikiel 1 week ago
I haven't heard Pat use the word "should". Granted what he said was pretty stupid, but I still don't hear the word "should", I only heard "can"
CvijaFaQ 1 week ago
Dumb ass turkish cenk ugur is a puppet and a hypocrite atheist fake ass political analyst.
bizkaynepoe 1 week ago
Pat Robertson should un-acquire his bullshit.
RavenousSky 1 week ago 2
We get it Pat, you're Bi-Sexual...
1993Kittens 2 weeks ago
I like Pepsi more then Coke, should i 'Un-Acquire' my taste for pepsi?
im not gay, but i dont understand why they need to care so much about this stuff, just let it be normal and live with it, Gay Pride festivals tho, They are horrible shows of gay people, the ones who join that parade, you are part of the reason people dont want to understand you... please be "normal" gay or straight doesnt matter but you dont see us going around groping boobies on the streets once a year now do you?
jiiub 2 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
lightandbeautiful 2 weeks ago
@lightandbeautiful "homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'"."
Is that like the difference between 'Robin Hood and His Merry Men', and 'Robin Hood and His Gay Men' ?
mandolinic 5 days ago
I bet Pat Robertson is a closet gay himself.
HindsightPOV 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"New Prediction From Pat Roberston"....There will be a great Unicorn galloping upon a rainbow..Riding it's back will be a huge Toad covered in skittles flavored warts and out of his mouth you will hear in a loud thunderous voice saying........ "TASTE THE RAINBOW" !!
disposablefreedom 4 weeks ago
old FOOL!
modplugrad 1 month ago
I thout he was talkin bout that guy from twilight
Immabe74 1 month ago
Keep the subtitles on and it says 'summer sexuality' at one point
LiteracyLabyrinth2 1 month ago
I don't know if it has to do with genes or hormones or what, but I do know that it has to do with the hypothalamus, which is an ancient part of the brain that is not easy to access. So please, Mr. I-don't-know-what-I'm-talking-about, tell us how to modify and control the hypothalamus's responses to estrogen and testosterone.
BrandonSchleifer 1 month ago
yes, you don't know my genes or my lifestyle, so KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT OLD MAN. stupid old fuck haha
Aom567 1 month ago
@Aom567
haha
likecrunchyness 1 month ago
i thumbpt this up, it was a comedy yes?
thepulpsatire 1 month ago
@SandBarAndYou Yes i am implying that. Your comments are revealing enough.
Kooshkff 1 month ago
Can you stop a bear from shitting in the woods?
rohag735 1 month ago
The good news is atheism and secularism are winning. And it's because they are good things.
SandBarAndYou 1 month ago
@SandBarAndYou
Atheism and secularism are winning?
I'm sorry but mob mentality is not how the American government works. You live in a republic that was designed to promote domestic tranquility and the general welfare. You aren't going to get that by badgering people into leaving their religions. Secular government is a provider of religious freedom and THAT is why it is a good thing. Atheism and secular government not the same. Atheism only your personal choice. That statement was ignorant.
Kooshkff 1 month ago
@Kooshkff Who said anything about badgering people to leave their religions or that atheism is the same thing as secularism? I never did. Like you said, a secular government provides for religious freedom. You're implying that I'm making a connection that I'm not making.
SandBarAndYou 1 month ago
Religion leads to backwardness,... Believing in something because someone says it's true. Only thing that says Bible is true is Bible itself,...
SaricIsmet 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
lightandbeautiful 1 month ago
Turn on captions: "big boobies and fine women" -> "big movies and firewood". Yeah, still needs a bit of work.
evilparkin 1 month ago in playlist More videos from TheYoungTurks
@Gregorypeckory Have you noticed that the same people who call themselves liberal are against teaching religion in school? well then how can they complain if there are ignorant religious people? The majority if them have never read Leviticus and probably never will. A mandatory highshool comparative Religion course would do the world some good. It doesnt have to replace science. ( and yes im on a tangent )
Kooshkff 1 month ago
Comment removed
DogsneedpIeasuretoo 1 month ago
@Kooshkff
"Have you noticed that the same people who call themselves liberal are against teaching religion in school?"
So, you support teaching children the Islam religion, Buddhism religion, Mormon religion, Scientology religion, faithist religion, etc? There are hundreds of different religions, so which one should be teach?
Wouldn't be easier to just let the parents chose what religion they want to teach their children? Let the parents teach their kids at home what ever they want.
DogsneedpIeasuretoo 1 month ago
@DogsneedpIeasuretoo
That's right. all of them.
Kooshkff 1 month ago
@DogsneedpIeasuretoo
"Wouldn't be easier to just let the parents chose what religion they want to teach their children?"
That obviously doesn't work. There is nothing wrong with educating children about other religions and cultures. I'm not saying to teach it as if it is truth. I'm talking about making theology mandatory. Religion is a big part of the world, like it or not. It is ignorant to ignore it.
Kooshkff 1 month ago
@Kooshkff Chinese Mandarin is the most common language in the world. And yet, schools in the US usually have French, Spanish and German but not Chinese Mandarin. Movies are a huge part of our culture. But there is no class about movies. Dating is a huge part of any culture. No class on that either. We focus on the important stuff.
SandBarAndYou 1 month ago
@SandBarAndYou
That is irrelevant really. There is no need to for American students to learn Chinese.
Also, Movies and dating do not need to be taught, they are leisure activities.
There is a need for people to be educated about religion. The majority of people on this channel are complaining about 'ignorant religious people' but when it comes time for a solution it falls on deaf ears. In Germany they teach religious tolerance to students, why can't they do that in America?
Kooshkff 1 month ago
@Kooshkff
That actually would be nice. :)
DogsneedpIeasuretoo 1 month ago
@Gregorypeckory The solution to this problem is simple. People need to be educated about religion. Homoseexuals are a minority, and it is their rights that are being questioned. In a functioning democracy if everyone believes the anti-gay interpretation of Leviticus then the religious will be anti-gay. in that sense antitheists and fundies alike are the problem. They are both taking that verse out of context.
Kooshkff 1 month ago
@katimere2 I think I might have seen you in downtown San Francisco, with a "God Hates Fags" sandwich sign. Good luck with your bible thumping, but I think I'll take a pass, as tempting as it is to change my beliefs in response to a disturbed individual typing in all caps, for the second half of your childish diatribe. For good health, I'll continue staying away from pigs and crabs, but also fanatic nutcases, such as you.
Gregorypeckory 1 month ago
@Gregorypeckory No you have not seen me at your Gay Parade. But then again you might have been too busy bent over getting shit pushed up in your ass to notice anything but dick and balls. So please continue to stay away from FANATIC NUTCASES SUCH AS MYSELF.
katimere2 1 month ago
I love the subtitles... lol
Ian74263 1 month ago
This was ruined by the Ceaser Milan video. The dumbass has no clue about dog behavior.
musiclovinggurl123 1 month ago
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
lightandbeautiful 1 month ago
@l0gically
"majority of homosexuals are males" Not likely."←Statistic studies have proven this.
Homosexuals "born" from the older brother effect are only males. (NO FEMALES)
Homosexual "born" from the gay gene are only males (NO FEMALES as they are straight)
And finally, environmental factors can make both males and females homosexual, this does creates lesbians and gays equally.
2 of 3 don't create lesbians so there are less lesbians than gays in a ratio of 3 gays to 1 lesbian. :)
DogsneedpIeasuretoo 1 month ago
________________Homosexuality "defies nature".
rick4evergreen 1 month ago
Pat Robertson is a pompous ignoramus. Who listens to him besides a few hardcore fundy crackpots anyway?
Albtraumen 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
lightandbeautiful 1 month ago
No one ever wonders why there is so much BPA ( high estrogen levels) IN ALL OUR PRODUCTS causing females to go into puberty sooner, higher rates of breast cancer. Testosterone deficiency is related to imbalances in the mother's system while caring male children leading to effeminate males thus DING DING HOMOSEXUALS. The elite know what they are doing if people are too busy screwing the same sex they won't be out there making babies.
katimere2 1 month ago
@katimere2 HAHA O thank u made my day
phoenix73662 1 month ago
You un-acquire something by changing your thoughts about it. A huge amount of our thought processes are based on cultural and environmental circumstances. For example, studies have shown that boys with multiple older brothers are more likely to be attracted to men. Is this genetic? No, it's environmental. Until science discovers a "gay gene" being "born gay" is simply a theory.
rhadiem 1 month ago
@rhadiem I guess being born heterosexual must be a theory too because science hasn't discovered the hetero gene either. if sexuality was as simple as changing your thought process (or choice as it's also known) then the default setting for human sexuality would be bi-sexual or a-sexual.
ZelenoffFanClub 1 month ago
@ZelenoffFanClub There are genes that determine if one is a male or female correct? Sperm and ova need to mix still to reproduce correct?
UnexpectedWonder 1 month ago
@UnexpectedWonder Way to miss the point. As for 'immoral lifestyles', is there a gene for morality too? Morality is subjective and as such varies from person to person and culture to culture. There is no fixed morality for anyone. Even religious types like to pick and choose what piques their moral conscience. Gays bad! Liars, adulterers and the covetous not so much... and which one isn't featured in the top 10 of gods what-not-to-do list?
ZelenoffFanClub 1 month ago
Don't believe the homosexual communities propaganda that they were " born that way " This is pure nonsense. If you want to change your sexual orientation, you can through faith in jesus.
polowres 1 month ago
@polowres Amen brother (or sister).
WSC9293 1 month ago
@polowres So you believe in a nonsense story of existance of a mythical person who wasn't born due to a sexual contact but don't believe in the role of genetics and DNA in someone's sexual orientation. Ask your close friends to help you pull your head out of your ass.
graphicsociety1 1 month ago
@graphicsociety1 Jesus did exist, its in the bible. If you don't believe in the bible I suggest you look in a history textbook. God Bless! (not sarcasm)
polowres 1 month ago
i butt fucked jesus!
mcslowlife 1 month ago
If homosexuals are "born that way", then pedophiles are "born that way" too. If the Young Turds are going to argue that all humans are slaves to their genes, then it would be a logical fallacy to claim that one is and the other isn't. Paving the way for the next abomination ... legalized pedophilia.
MaryWaterton 1 month ago
@MaryWaterton You cannot compare stealing the innocence of a child through rape to two consenting adults that are unable to biologically feel for the opposite sex.
Sean117Ply 1 month ago
@Sean117Ply
Why you assume that pedophilia means rape?
Do you even know the definition of pedophilia?
DogsneedpIeasuretoo 1 month ago
@MaryWaterton
Pedophilia is already LEGAL and there is nothing wrong with being a pedophile.
DogsneedpIeasuretoo 1 month ago
The more bigoted dinosaurs like Pat Robertson open their pie holes and spew such hateful nonsense, the faster that Christianity will evolve to be viewed as a mental illness. Ironically, the good news for Pat Robertson and his deluded followers is that religion, unlike sexual identity, may be, in fact, possible to deprogram or "unacquire".
MrSeattleNative 1 month ago
There's a reason I systematically went through every category on Redtube when I first tried porn. I knew even back then people were wired to have different fetishes and there's no realistic way to "predict" what you will and will not like. I say if you're attracted to people the same gender as you, by all means date people the same gender. It's not like you're actually hurting anyone, except the nosy idiots who think they have the right to control each other's lives.
TheCreeperhunter 1 month ago
Pat Robertson; the same ignorant, rich, Fuck head who didn't know what Mac and cheese was. He thought it was a "black thing" I hate that fucker. I hope someone knocks his tiny fairy dust balls off.
SCREAMOpants 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which famous atheist Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
lightandbeautiful 1 month ago
Is it weird that I read that as Robert Pattinson?
thequietoneattheback 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which famous atheist Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
lightandbeautiful 1 month ago
Doesn't anyone remember the story of Pat Robertsons "blood diamond mine"? He made millions of dollars on this opperation in Africa. In a seperate story about child slavery it was reported; this area is known as a place where children are sold as sex slaves. Has any of the main stream media bothered to follow him there to see what little boys he's been purchasing? Does this sick pervert have a luxury rape house to ply his craft? Do he and Limbaugh have little boys together in Dominica?
geezerdombroadcast 1 month ago
I think that being gay is acquired in your life. If you think gays are born gay, thenyour basically saying that your parents have gay genes
kfcKICKSass 1 month ago
Robertson is a crackhead.
bfgoodrik 1 month ago
I very much like the TYT Network =)
Vicarapostolic 1 month ago
The best thing Pat said in that clip was "I don't know" cause that's right Pat you don't know. Get your shit together you old cocksucker...probably literally.
DTMTroy 1 month ago
@SocialDissimulation You referred to the behavior as attention seeking, and I gave you the opportunity to help me understand the logic that you would come to, to view it as wanted attention. If I were to use your example, the woman would have to sleep with a black man just so she can be ostracized. As your prior statement, it makes no sense.
bakslashr 1 month ago
@bakslashr Stay in school kiddo.
SocialDissimulation 1 month ago
@SocialDissimulation Learn critical thinking.
bakslashr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which famous atheist Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
lightandbeautiful 1 month ago
Religitards like Pat Robertson should "un-acquire" their outdated moronic beliefs in a magical invisible sky wizard.
jschultzVII 1 month ago
@jschultzVII
Exactly, jschults!
Mokurentate 1 month ago in playlist watchitlater
@katimere2 Yes woman who cannot bear children herself or any man who cannot produce an ample amount of sperm to have a child is immoral in their very existence because they must pay.
UncontestedTruth 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which famous atheist Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
lightandbeautiful 1 month ago
Im gay, 26 and started being with men properly at age 18 or 19 up until this year. I dont believe I was born gay but through experiences I completely lost my attraction to females. I try not to lead a gay life any more and dont really care if I was or wasnt born gay. I know its not moral for me to be with a man sexually. From my experience, it pushes me away from God. Its not social conditioning or anything else. I was always supported in being gay and thought that God would be ok with it..
WillsM85 1 month ago
@WillsM85 Maybe you are bi-sexual. Bi-sexuals are sometimes more attracted to one sex than the other, or they can just be deeply in love with a specific person and don't care about their sex. If you have to try to not act on wanting to be with a man, you still have the attraction to men. Why do you feel it's not moral for you? I can't tell you how to live though. I am a little puzzled by your saying it pushes you away from God, but God would be okay with it.
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@WillsM85 why would god have a problem with sexuality? that statement really bothers me. do you believe that in the eyes of god a man who has a loving relationship with another man is somehow morally corrupt in comparison to a man who has a relationship with a woman?
513minato 1 month ago in playlist More videos from TheYoungTurks
lmfao. what a tool.
Jamiesuitor 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which famous atheist Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
lightandbeautiful 1 month ago
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexuality and homosexuality. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have successfully framed themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate than the word "gay" because it actually describes the behavior/relationship being discussed.
lightandbeautiful 1 month ago
@lightandbeautiful What are those IMPROTANT differences?
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz I mean IMPORTANT.
dexterxyz 1 month ago
... AND WHY THE HELL ISNT THIS GUY DEAD ALREADY! Start smoking ffs!
sadguyfoundout11 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fuck a vagina and call me pussymagnet
johnnyboyfart 1 month ago
@JOEtheHOTTIE sigh...Elton John
Meatbag211 1 month ago
@Meatbag211 really? elton john? is he really happy with his life? he's an entertainer of course his handlers will glamorize his life. let's look at other examples... george michael--arrested several times and has addiction problems, need i say more?
JOEtheHOTTIE 1 month ago
@JOEtheHOTTIE LOL! As though no high-profile heterosexuals have had well-publicized troubles in their life!
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz AH! "Because the statistics of the alternative are not perfect, my opinion must be true!"
Firequacker 1 month ago
@Firequacker The stars, gay and straight, have problems which are always out in the public eye, like their careers. Oh well. It has nothing to do with being gay or being straight.
dexterxyz 1 month ago
It seems like most non religious arguments against homosexuality hover around 'its gross'. Course, that very argument can be used against the idea of ones own parents having intercourse.
Meatbag211 1 month ago
@Meatbag211 Non-religious arguments? I think you're confusing faith and religion. They are, in fact, very easy to separate, and religion is often very presumptuous and harmful to society. Faith is finding your path into the greatest good, and homosexuality simply is NOT the path to the greatest good. Nothing else to be said about it, it is not the way.
Firequacker 1 month ago
@chestveeg so they kept the boys too?
Meatbag211 1 month ago
@Meatbag211 numbers 31:17-18 certainly does not encourage pedophilia. Killing the men and integrating the undefiled woman and young girls into your society Is hardly encouraging pedophilia. The men only would have grown strong and fought against them again.
chestveeg 1 month ago
WHY IS THE CONCEPT OF HOW WE ALL GOT HERE SO DISTURBING TO HOMOSEXUALS. EXCEPT FOR TEST TUBE BABIES WHO ALSO USE BOTH MALE AND FEMALE TO CREATE THE CHILD. HETEROSEXUALS HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH EVERYONE BEING LIKE THEM, BUT HOMOSEXUALS EVEN KNOW THEIR LIFESTYLE IS COUNTER PRODUCTIVE TO LIFE ITSELF. Everyone can't love the same sex it makes no sense.
katimere2 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@katimere2 " Everyone can't love the same sex it makes no sense."
Everyone doesn't love the same sex. Only some people love the same sex. There, I made sense of it for you. I would also suggest reading about kin selection. It shows how non-breeding folks are still beneficial to societal structures.
Meatbag211 1 month ago
@katimere2 Most heterosexuals don't care that not everyone is like them. No one is saying everyone needs to like the same sex. Any pregnancy that is planned, is counter-productive to unplanned or compulsive pregnancy. Sexual intercourse between a male and female may lead to unplanned pregnancy. That is not the only way to create life, and it's not morally superior. So what really is your point?
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz How is homosexuality morally equivalent to heterosexuality? You must establish at least partial dominance over a man, which makes his confidence in some situations brittle. He breaks his peace for his partner. A woman never breaks her peace for her man, they work in unison with the sexual temperaments they were born with, man and woman.
Firequacker 1 month ago
@Firequacker You're worried a man will submit to a man, but a woman will not submit in her relationship with a man? One could just as easily, depending on their perspective, say a male and male relationship is more equal. It really depends on the relationship, not the sexes.
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz A woman should submit to a man in a relationship because she is weaker.. A relationship is not meant to be 'equal,' it is meant to fulfill biological and sociological needs. We do not all need to be treated equally, otherwise our pasts would mean nothing and existence would be a purgatory. And, actually, considering our entire genome is geared to sexual polarity, it DOES depend on the sexes. You, sir, have confirmation bias for penis in your rectum.. and some good blinders, to boot.
Firequacker 1 month ago
@Firequacker You say a woman should submit to a man because she is weaker? Which hillbilly time warp are you living in? Good luck with that. You're the one with the blinders. You have no idea what I do in bed, nor anyone else whether gay or straight.
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz In a stable, healthy, honest relationship, the man is the dominant figure. Weaker doesn't mean incapable, it means not as strong. Men are more capable of strength, more capable of resilience, more capable of intellectualizing. Men are the ones that perform the sex acts. They are to be submitted to.. This isn't hillbillyism. It's just natural progression from nonhuman to human, we ended up this way.
Firequacker 1 month ago
@Firequacker Weakness is a fickle word subject to the person in question. Women are weaker in what aspect? Physically? I know of plenty women who are stronger than me and you.
Mentally? More women possess PHDs than men.
Physically many men only have the advantage over women if they exercise.
Capability to intellectualize isnt inherent in a gender. I encourage you to study the Tabula Rasa concept.
UncontestedTruth 1 month ago
@dexterxyz Sex is not the only way to produce a baby. That being said it is the morally superior way to have children. My point is homosexuality is non productive for the creation of life. TEST TUBE BABIES ARE NOT THE NORM.
katimere2 1 month ago
@katimere2 Why is it morally superior? Every pregnancy a gay person has is planned. When being careless, penis in vagina may lead to unplanned, unwanted, accidental pregnancy. So what makes it so morally superior?
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz Now you just proved how stupid you really are. GAY PEOPLE NATURALLY (MORALLY) CAN NOT HAVE CHILDREN BUT HETEROSEXUAL PEOPLE CAN WEATHER THEY ARE PLANNING TO OR NOT. So I ask you if it was not for modern technology via adoption or some fool willing to give you a child HOW ELSE CAN YOU REPRODUCE HUMAN KIND?
katimere2 1 month ago
@katimere2 What you put in caps is what I said, minus the attaching morality to nature fallacy. Every pregnancy a gay person is involved in, is planned. That's not always true for heterosexuals. Reproduction happens in all cases. What makes the most planned pregnancies/reproduction less moral?
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz Reproduction DOES NOT happen in THE CASE OF BEING A HOMOSEXUAL. SORRY DOESN'T HAPPEN. I CAN SAY I AM A HETEROSEXUAL AND EVERYONE SHOULD BE ONE. CAN HOMOSEXUALS SAY THE SAME? Well maybe they can though I think there would be no one left on the planet.
katimere2 1 month ago
@katimere2 Why should everyone be heterosexual? The only thing you mention is reproduction. That's not enough. There needs to be a genuine attraction(orientation), pleasure and love. There is so much more to sexuality than reproduction. Are you only heterosexual for the reproduction? Gays could do that too, imagining someone else as they insert the genitals(or be inserted), if all you that matters is a certain type of reproduction. This doesn't make for a good, moral relationship.
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@katimere2 How about developing loving, caring relationships and having wanted, loved children. How does the fact that a penis went into a vagina produce a moral standard which is higher than a different form of insemination/reproduction?
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz You gays are too funny. If you morally have to pay to get a baby than you are open to corruption. Morally - .adhering to conventionally accepted standards of conduct. YES MORALLY SEX IS ACCEPTABLE MORAL WAY TO HAVE CHILDREN. You can get genetically modified food if you want to BUT NATURALLY GROWN FOOD WITHOUT SCIENCE MANIPULATING GENES IS BEST, ALL WOULD AGREE TO THAT. Except someone who may be brain dead,drug induced or HOMOSEXUAL?????
katimere2 1 month ago
@Meatbag211 Pedophiles ,Zoophiles and Gays have a problem. They have unnatral attractions. The same as a Pyromaniac experiencing euphoria after starting fires. The good thing is there is help for them all if they want it.
chestveeg 1 month ago
@chestveeg "Gays have a problem. They have unnatral attractions."
You keep saying that, but you don't actually say why it's unnatural or why it's a problem.
If the answer you are unwilling to say is "the bible says so", then is the help you keep bringing up the death penalty? Because that's what the bible's punishment is for homosexuals. Interestingly, it actually encourages pedophilia, such as Numbers 31:17-18.
Meatbag211 1 month ago
@Meatbag211
The bible is full of incest. Abraham was married to his sister Sarah. That wasn't considered immoral or unnatural.
BjoernarEricSven 1 month ago
Pat Robertson is an ignorant moron. And he's a conman and a thief.
algeo1100 1 month ago
@47f0 Pedophiles,Zoophiles and Homosexuals all have the same problem. The upside is that there is help for them if they want it. Sadly many of them brainwash themselves into thinking that their affections are ok.
chestveeg 1 month ago
@chestveeg No one is arguing for Pedophilia or Beastiality, because for them to carry out their desires would involve harming the other party or having sex without consent. Make a case why homosexuality isn't like a person finding tattoos attractive. We don't try to treat men who date tattoo'd women, do we? Because in that case, no harm is involved and consent is given.
Meatbag211 1 month ago
@Meatbag211 I certainly think that an attraction to material, a lust not related to love, is something that should be offered help. I do not treat gay men, I offer them advice on a few youtube videos when I come across ridiculous assertions and all that jazz. It IS like finding tattoos attractive, it is a lust unrelated to love. We should all live our lives purely in love. You are much more capable, as a man, than submitting to another man.
Firequacker 1 month ago
Your tripping
emmanuelmccoy2 1 month ago
Disagree gay is no gene
emmanuelmccoy2 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@emmanuelmccoy2 - "Disagree gay is no gene."
.
Disagree comment is no English.
47f0 1 month ago
@shittyfagg Well from a scientific standpoint, it beats the hell out of simply saying meh and forgetting about a lot of the bad stuff out there like a lot of people do, and perhaps in the time that one gives it in prayer the person will think about it just long enough to come up with a solution, whether or not it is a solution given to the person by god, it's still a solution, and you can't deny solutions to problems are always a good thing.
DEATHBYFLYINGCDS 1 month ago
@Meatbag211 Well first off I know its not totally corrupt given my connections. As for how corrupt it may be, I don't know, just like I don't know how corrupt our own government is, all I can do is have faith.Sometimes faith is rewarded, other times of course it isn't, just look at all faith people put in Obama,and how horribly he has disappointed us.Such failures of faith can be devastating,that's why the amount of people who say they aren't going to vote this next election is higher than ever.
DEATHBYFLYINGCDS 1 month ago
@DEATHBYFLYINGCDS - Please. Putting your faith in President Obama is exactly why faith is an awful way to do things. At best, it's simply a warm fuzzy security blanket that does nothing. At worst, you'll make faulty decisions. BTW - I had zero "faith" in Obama, which is why I voted for him and will again. I researched him at the Library of Congress, liked what I saw there, ignored campaign rhetoric, and got, I think, a pretty competent administrator. Not a faith-based messiah.
47f0 1 month ago
@SocialDissimulation It's semantics to argue over whether or not seeking attention is the sole reason or a reason someone is gay. If you are offering that as a theory, the onus is on you to provide evidence or I'm calling bs. Homosexual orientation involves more than behaviour. So gays aren't a minority because of behaviour. Your example of the thug wanting attention is a diversion. Prove that applies to gays. Sexuality may or may not be benign, depending on the issue.
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz Do you seriously not have the capacity to read? I have said over five times now to several different people: I AM NOT SAYING IT IS THE SOLE REASON. You're creating a straw dragon, and you're not the first. I was saying that the majority of new 'gays' do a lot of it for the attention accrued. It's just a guess, I never said it was fact or even evidenced, but I am making the claim that it's not being looked into to avoid hurting feelings. Press 1 for "I understand", 2 for don't.
SocialDissimulation 1 month ago
@SocialDissimulation Well one can make any wild claim they wish, and defend it merely by calling it a "guess". It's your claim that is the strawman.
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz Clearly you misinterpreted my point, but I digress. I can't even begin to start debating with a person who cannot be honest. You're clearly trying to stave the conversation rather than add to it so I must say to you have a nice life.
SocialDissimulation 1 month ago
@SocialDissimulation You can't debate this because you "guessed" up a possible theory with no reason(diversion subjects like your example of the thug don't count) or evidence. We can't absolutely prove that anything is impossible, we can't prove a negative. I'm sorry, but that's not good enough to warrant giving your theory any consideration.
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz 1. Are you saying that people have not exhibited homosexual behavior for attention? 2. If so, then what would convince you? 3. The road has not been traveled to avoid hurting someone's sensibility, because people would rather coddle that population than even give the -perception- of being bigoted. There is plenty of evidence to suggest that there are plenty environmental factors that go into homosexuality, just as many as pedophilia.
SocialDissimulation 1 month ago
@SocialDissimulation Gay and lesbian sexual orientation isn't just about behaviour. No one is gay and no one acts gay for attention. You assume there is a road to travel in this regard. Where is the reason and evidence to support your assumption? We don't know what the environmental factors are for being gay, nor how many. Citing early environmental factors as a possibility combined with genetics does not mean one is gay for attention.
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz People behave as gays/homosexuals/lesbians, because they are attracted to people of the same sex. That's all there is to it.
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz First and foremost, you are completely oblivious to sexual behavior. People can do anything to attain attention, and there are -plenty- of people who perform sexual acts on others not because of attraction but: vengeance, attention and even spite. To just sit there with arms folded saying no, no possible way that people do things for attention is not only disingenuous to begin with, it's downright stupid. Not sure if retarded or trolling.
SocialDissimulation 1 month ago
@SocialDissimulation You speak in the broadest overly-generalized terms of "people" performing sexual acts(or behaviours) on others for "vengeance, attention and even spite". You haven't given a shred of evidence or reason to show that any of this is associated with homosexuality, because there isn't any. It is you who is ignorant and trolling.
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz (cont) Homosexuality has been studied and not shown to be associated with attention-seeking or any of those other things. Simply because certain other things have been shown to be associated, does not mean homosexuality is. It does not mean homosexuality has an association to any behaviour you can think up. There isn't a conspiracy to suppress the knowledge you haven't given us reason to believe even exists.
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz SO let me get this straight: all other sexual behaviors never, at any point, apply themselves to homosexuality? The level of stupidity is astounding. Really, I have never seen someone contort themselves so badly to save face in an argument. I hope you can walk after this lol.
SocialDissimulation 1 month ago
@SocialDissimulation Lol! What a strawman!
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz You? Declaring someone else is utilizing a strawman? If only you had the capacity to understand irony.
SocialDissimulation 1 month ago
@SocialDissimulation No strawman on my part. I was focused like a laser on the topic at hand: homosexuality. All you can seem to offer are diversions. Just because you can see attention-getting behaviour in one area, does not mean it applies to homosexuality/homosexual behaviour. There's no reason to suspect it would. It's not a choice. Being gay emerges in early adolescence with no sexual experience previously. Gays merely act on immutable most basic sexual nature.
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz Focused like laser on such a broad topic? I think you ought to look at prisons before you make such bold assertions as to whether or not it's a choice. Your strawman is the continual iteration of: "but all homosexuality isn't attention-getting behavior". And that you completely avoid saying that homosexual sex can have other than loving connotations to avoid admitting that perhaps your rather weak psychoanalytical outlook on the behavior is a little marred makes me smile.
SocialDissimulation 1 month ago
@SocialDissimulation Your very faulty, prisons analogy, isn't homosexuality. Those are heterosexuals substituting what they can access. This also doesn't prove an attention-getting behaviour.
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz "Your very faulty,", "Those are heterosexuals substituting what they can access." So as long as I'm attracted to the feminine characteristics that makes me straight? Man oh man, this is definitely getting some blog space.
SocialDissimulation 1 month ago
@dexterxyz So if I'm on a dry spell is it gay if I have sex with a male buddy of mine? No, because I'm just substituting? Jesus Christ that's a horrible argument. Dexterxyz just said that even if you have homosexual sex it's not homosexual because it's a substitution. LOL.
SocialDissimulation 1 month ago
@dexterxyz Damn, the person you were arguing with is an idiot.
TheAssesKicker 1 month ago
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which famous atheist Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
lightandbeautiful 1 month ago
@lightandbeautiful hahahahahah.... ohhh you're serious
headbanger2510 1 month ago
@lightandbeautiful so true. it is even ironic that homosexuals call themselves 'gay' when they are anything but gay--they live empty lives. that's basically what you end up when you choose to engage in the homosexual lifestyle--your life becomes empty and all you become concerned about is sexual gratification with the same sex.
JOEtheHOTTIE 1 month ago
@JOEtheHOTTIE How would you know? Are you gay? Is this your personal experience?
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz Oh, okay, let me get this straight. If HE doesn't claim to be gay, then none of his claims about homosexuality can be truth! Okay.
How do we know you're gay? Hm? How do we know this isn't just a habit of yours spawned from some sad incident, some sad realization you had that you couldn't handle the world as a straight man anymore? How do WE KNOW that YOU aren't pulling a fast one and taking a guess about your nature, then just riding with the feeling?
Firequacker 1 month ago
@Firequacker "How do WE KNOW that YOU aren't pulling a fast one and taking a guess about your nature, then just riding with the feeling?"
Could you be gay if you wanted to?
Meatbag211 1 month ago
@Firequacker This is silly. He claimed to know the deeply personal experiences of gay men. I never claimed to be so familiar with the personal lives and feelings of straight men.
dexterxyz 1 month ago
@dexterxyz I claim to know the deeply personal experiences of men transforming their lives. Gay men aren't living some incredibly deep, complex, 'you-had-to-be-there' problem. None of us are, unless we're working in a bureaucracy.
Firequacker 1 month ago
@dexterxyz name one homosexual who is truly living a happy life. be honest. i dare you. name one. name just one.
JOEtheHOTTIE 1 month ago
@JOEtheHOTTIE I'll name you three. 1. Neal Patrick Harris. 2. Elton John 3.Ellen Degeneres
Rated1804 1 month ago
@Rated1804 pffft. celebrities. do you know them personally? can you attest that they are truly living happy lives? don't believe everything they show you on TV. if you personally know someone who is living the homosexual lifestyle, i am willing to bet they have plenty of problems.
JOEtheHOTTIE 1 month ago
@JOEtheHOTTIE no I do not know them personally, but can you attest that they are unhappy? I do personally know homosexuals who are very happy but you wouldn't believe me if I told you about them, I had to use celebs. Search Peron75 on Youtube he's a gay man who has been happily married for over 9 years.
Millions of people in the world have problems, not just homosexuals. What makes you think its only homosexuals?
Rated1804 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JOEtheHOTTIE "name one homosexual who is truly living a happy life. be honest. i dare you. name one. name just one." ... what a stupid question... I could also say "name one heterosexual who is truly living a happy life. be honest. i dare you. name one. name just one." and its an equally as valid question stupid
sadguyfoundout11 1 month ago
PRAY THE GAY AWAY!
It worked for Michelle Bachmann HUSBAND...
pooyan6969 1 month ago
Comment removed
Kooshkff 1 month ago