I NEED TO KNOW WHAT KIND OF GAUGES THOSE ARE!!! LOL. If anybody knows could you please tell me, ive spent hours looking for them, this is the exact setup I want know for my 68 chevelle dash.
@maxst420 The dashboard ones are from Auto Meter, the center console I'm not sure but they look just like summit racing analog gauges. You can find both on summits web site. If you want the link send me a PM.
dood tom nelson is a FUCKING GENIOUS, if there were a god of engines this would be him, tom build my car you can do anything . lets put a v8 boosted in my integra...............something new...
@pier456 This is what i am trying to tell you, when it comes to all out racing, use the tools that God has given you. Dont sit there and cry about oh but your motor is bigger. These are the advantages of big motors, not much rev is needed to make big power.
@pier456 Again to me i think if i can make 2200hp @ 28psi of boost and leave more room to grow form there on that is a better solution than having 2500hp @ 50psi reving to 10k rpms and maxing out the builds capability
@osirisvb Once again you are reading things wrong. No where does the article state it takes 50psi of boost to make 2500hp and needing to rev up to 10k rpms.
@pier456 to make 2500hp out of a 6.2 litre he is going to have to boost that thing pretty hard, its not going to be achievable at 28lbs of boost, thats for sure.
@osirisvb more fun is personal opinion immediate acceleration depends on the setup and its gearing a guy with 10krpm range could smoke those guys with 6k rpms as well.
@pier456 so why doesnt the GTR use a 10k RPM rev limit? why does it red line at 7000rpm and I bet the automatic transmission shifts way before 7k rpms? Why does it make so much power so easily? why didnt Nissan choose to make it 10k rpms?
@pier456 I dont see how your buggati analogy has anything to do with the rev range that we are talking about. My quesiton is why does Nissan not use 10k rpms if it is so much more better as you stated, the GTR shifts right around 6.8-7k rpms why not rev it to 10k rpms?
@pier456 Not really, again depending on how that big v8 is making its power, if it is N/A then reving it to a higher rpm to make big power is needed, but if its boosted you dont have to rev it to higher rpms, especially when you have displacement to work with.
@pier456 so now its about gearing and shift points? Well gearing and shift points are based where the motor makes its power. Not just you can put the longest gears on high reving engines.
Besides not like you have to rev to 10k anyways. if the engine is capable of 10k revs safely it will out last a engine that can safely rev to 6k. have both engines hold 4k rpms and see who lasts longer...
@pier456 Again depends on the motor, even with n/a there a big blocks capable of makin 820+ naturally aspirated, if all that power is available at 6rpm range you can kiss the 10k rpm car good bye. its all about the power under the curve.
@pier456 nope, the 6k rpm motor will have developed all its power and put it to the wheels and gone ahead of the guy having to wait till 10k rpms coming around.
Besides high rpm = high compression = more stress on the internals because they are doing more work than a low rpm motor.
@osirisvb that totally explains all those high rev turbo honda's... I am not talking about max power at 10k rpms or what ever you are trying to get at.
@osirisvb Why are you changing the subject. Just because its high reving doesn't mean 11++ compression ratio. I could careless if a high rev turbo honda could make 2200hp at 28lbs of boost etc. etc. or not.
@pier456 Yes being smart with you is beyond your comprehension becasue you live in your little bubble. Just like how you think the GTR is the God's chariot.
@pier456 In your endless tirades of how the GTR is so superior etc etc in other videos. LOL!! too funny, anyways no 10krpms is not always nice to have.
@pier456 Again your whole idea of having 10krpm range is better is actually completely flawed, there are times when having a high rpm range helps and there are times when it is completely pointless. With big engines they dont have to rev so high to make big power.
@osirisvb Obviously every setup isn't perfect. besides 10k rpm is just a example. A high revving engine is 8k and above. But their more pros then cons for having a higher rev range...
A engine capable of reving up to 10k will be able to last longer then a engine capable of only 6k. Have both set at 6k rpms and the one built for 10k will last longer
@pier456 'can support a bigger turbo' <-- well NRE proved that statement wrong, they achieved almost all of Chris Rados hp estimates with 28 psi of boost and at 6-7k rpm range.
I am not crying about anything. Saying you are trying to make things fair then compare a 572ci motor to 376ci motor is stupid. Doesn't prove anything. Compare a ls9 toa 3UR both modded and the 3UR will out do it.
@pier456 I dont think the 3ur will out do it, because it is a hypothetical comparison that has not taken place, so we really dont know what the result will be, anything else is pure speculations. Also when was having to rev to 10k rpm the end all and know of making power, id rather make it at 6000rpms and leave that 10krpm reving motor in the dust.
@osirisvb Who said reving to 10k rpm the end of all making power? Whose talking about how much power at a certain rpm? being able to make power at 10krpms will always be better then only at 6krpms... Plus you have more room for bigger turbo setups...if it was pointless f1 cars wouldn't be reving up to 16k+ broader powerband ftw.
@pier456 Why is it better? what comes first ? 6k rpms or 10k rpms? If my engine makes its peak power at 6k rpms where as you have to rev to 10k rpms to make your power who do you think is going to win? Not the 10k rpm motor, The only reason high reving engines were made is because they reduced the displacement and made power at the upper end of the rpm range, without forced induction, btw high reving = high compression ratio = not very boost friendly. F1 cars are all small V10s n/a
@osirisvb Did someone forget about gearing and where the person shifts at? Lets drop a big turbo setup on our car now... Which is going to take advantage of it the most.. the 6krpms or 10k rpms?
btw that logic doesn't work... especially since i was talking about a high reving car on boost that isn't funny drag car...
@pier456 Again the logic still works, the only problem is you fail to see it. Peak power at 6k rpm vs 10k rpm and if both engines are making the same power your 10krpm engine car will loose.
@pier456 well if you are going to come in here and act like the 3ur is the best thing ever, you are going to get what you asked for. When you play a game where making the maximum power is the goal then dont limit your displacement. If you do and then cry about it, thats not the concern of the other party, just because they bought a bigger engine with two turbos. Sky is the limit, if your camp limits itself, doesnt mean everyone else should.
@osirisvb i do not care what you are trying to get at with this. Bottom line you compared a 572ci motor to a 376ci motor end of story. i don't care about how nelsonracing isn't going to limit what engine size they use etc.
@pier456 Like i said the goal is to make max power, no one is telling Chris Rado not to use a 572ci, they chose to stick to a 376, NRE on the other hand doesnt conform to limits of a 376, not NREs fault and they dont have to apologize for it, to least of all people like you. So dont come in here crying about how NRE is using a 572ci, its all part of the game of making power. you use the tools you have to make the best possible power, simple as that.
why do i need to quote? i said i never said you thought that. I am not saying they shouldn't use the BB engine. idk how much power the ls9 has made but I'm sure the 3UR will give it a good run. Actually scratch that. with a 10k rpm range etc. yea the 3UR would defiantly out do a modded ls9...
@pier456 Your missing one major point, the 3ur is heavily modified with added bore and stroke + being modified to reach 10k rpm range according to Chris Rado. In its production state the 3ur is merely a 5600rpm 381 hp engine, so lets do the same for the ls9. Why only have such rules for the 3ur, that is just a double standard, lets tear ls9 apart, bore and storke it as well then lets add two T88s on to the newly bored and stroked Ls9.
@pier456 Nothing to complain about just making sure if you bore and stroke a 350 cui to a 376 ci and call it fair then there can be Ls9 thats bored and stroked as well. If you want compare big power heavily modded engines you cant sit and cry about displacement.
@pier456 Please quote where I said that? My only tiff with all this speculation is that people are thrusting numbers everywhere regarding this supra build when none of it is verified in reality. NRE on the other hand has verified #s on the dyno for many of their builds. Also NRE doesnt have to apologize for using bbs, if its there and they have the money to use it in your build, let them use it. Like i said ' No replacement for displacement'
Bottom line is chris rado isn't some random guy. Not like he hasn't built insane setups before. And if we are going to compare engines then compare a ls9 to the 3UR seeing as they both are 376ci motors.
@pier456 Never said Chris Rado was some random coughing up figures. All i said is dont come in here posting numbers that are unverified, and are for now 'hypothetically' thought of numbers.
But you dont assume NRE is some bunch of noobs. Of course with twin 76 turbos it better make over 1000hp.
" Also just to clarify we are building this car to run the mile and other Top Speed runs so while driving this vehicle at anytime under 150mph we will only be running like 5-7psi which will easily net over 1000hp and boost will start climbing from there as drag and speed increases so will the boost pressure."
@pier456 has there been any official dynos of this car? or are you just saying 2500hp because he guesstimates 2500hp? how do you know 5-7 Psi of boost = over 1000hp? Have they done dyno tuning of this? I have not seen any videos of this car on a dyno at all, its not street legal, It will fail all emissions. Dont BS on figures when the car is still not done.
@osirisvb Or you can just look up teh guy and quit bitching to me like a 2 year old because another setup can make power without needing a nelson built engine...
@osirisvb I am not pulling figures out of my ass dumbass. Their from what HE has said. You got issues? Go try and contact him. I'm not wasting my time over some butt hurt guy. It what happens when Japanese v8's get worked on.
@pier456 Yeah so its a guesstimate. Here is a legitimate engine makeing almost that much power on 1/2 as much boost. I am not butt hurt, only challenge idiotic import fanbois like yourself who know next nothing about cars but walk around like you know something.
/watch?v=D_aS2cIfCTk <--2200+hp on 28psi of boost below 6500rpms, lets see your 3ur achieve that... thats what i thought.
@osirisvb First off do you know if its a guesstimate? NO, second off you are comparing a 376ci motor to a 572 BB v8... Now what if the 3UR had 572ci of displacement? Thats what i thought.
@pier456 Yes it is a guesstimate for now until they come out and do some rigorous dyno testing like NRE does and capture it on video. You can come in here and tell us your beloved 3UR is much more better than NRE, but its NOT! NRE has being doing this for a long time 2500hp is not their end all and know all.
Also all these numbers being thrown around about this 3UR setup but again nothing like what NRE has done which is consistent proof. When i seen it Ill believe it.
@pier456 A guesstimate is an estimate, aka they estimate it will make 2500hp they dont know where they will be with that buiild, since no numbers have been posted. So until i see some videos and clear hard numbers all this bs you spew is nothing but rubbish
@pier456 YOu import fanbois are all about 'what ifs' , this is not a world of what ifs, point is your 3UR cant hold a candle to some of the beasts NRE builds, so dont come in here acting like your 3UR is the end all and know all of making power.
@osirisvb Don't come in here acting like NRE builds are the end of all. You go compare a 572ci motor to a 376ci then try and say the 3UR doesn't hold a candle now? You're a complete dumbass.
@pier456 I never came in here and started anything you did like the typical ricer import fanboi you are. You cam in here flaunting your 3ur like it was the end all and know all of making power, i proved you wrong. Now STFU and realize your 3ur is NOT the end all and know of making power. NRE builds will blow it out of the water.
@pier456 I proved that the 2500hp figure is for now a guesstimate, you have no proof to provide otherwise other than someones word. And words mean little in this game, you either put it up or shut up. NRE has 1000s of videos showcasing their ability, and 2200hp+ @ 28psi below 6300rpm. Ur 3ur isnt done yet, so stop talking trash.
@pier456 Once again, you came in here and started shit about how your 3ur > LSx or w.e that sillyness was that you posted, when you are working off nothing but hypothetical figures. Until they build it up, put it on the dyno and do some measurements its all a bunch hypothetical figures.
yes it does prove something ' NO replacement for displacement'
@pier456 Yeah cuz i got time to go and contact Chris Rado or w/e his name is. The reason why they say 2500hp is because they 'estimate' aka 'guesstimate' it can hit 2500hp, but none of this is going to make any ones head boggle until they prove it can do what they estimate or aka guesstimate it to do.
Tom your craftmanship is unmatched, the levels you've taken combustion too is awesome, so can you .....fine tune my wife? u know good blower, mabe TT and ahhh... brakes awe yaa big stoppen brakes....please!!!! lol Nice Work
love how they show you underneath the car every inch of this car is tuned not just tint the windows and a big exhaust like people in the ghetto they think there car is the SHIT!a big exhaust chrome wheels tinted windows and a wing doesnt make there car 1000HP.thumbs up if you agree with me
road car? has a 1700 stall with twin turbos. how do you get off the line? or is it set up as asort of tc system so you dont over spin the street tires?
Wow I love the hard lines up front, so clean.
mattdaman666 1 day ago
4 people wish their jap crap was this fast
gmpushrodpower 2 weeks ago
I wouldn't want to park this on the street
jayke1343 2 weeks ago
Muito bom :D Lindoo o carro
luan14viper 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
hownychea 2 weeks ago
is this car finished yet? an update on its build would be nice
commofan88 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
I want this for my 69 Malibu!!!
Megatron1764 3 weeks ago
4 dislikes? Really? If you dont like this wtf do you like?!...this is top shelf roddin!
daviddntait 1 month ago
now for the important questions....what kind of fuel efficiency does it get lol doesnt matter thats absolutely amazing.
pinaction241 1 month ago
4:25 your welcome
drop5sfor6s 1 month ago
Awesome car!
bennydaugh85 1 month ago
I like how STREETABLE all Tom's builds are, Just fucking insane!!!!
DSMTurbo4g63 1 month ago
I love this Guy!!!!
DSMTurbo4g63 1 month ago
awesome ride!!
MasterOfDisaster407 1 month ago
I NEED TO KNOW WHAT KIND OF GAUGES THOSE ARE!!! LOL. If anybody knows could you please tell me, ive spent hours looking for them, this is the exact setup I want know for my 68 chevelle dash.
maxst420 1 month ago
@maxst420 The dashboard ones are from Auto Meter, the center console I'm not sure but they look just like summit racing analog gauges. You can find both on summits web site. If you want the link send me a PM.
yafooz 3 weeks ago
What kind of shifter is that???
supalogic 1 month ago
@supalogic Nevermind its a Winters Shifter
supalogic 1 month ago
Who are the 4 poo poo pushin' butt pirates who don't like this video?
CoolLikePenguinNuts 2 months ago
Finally ive found something i dont like on one of his cars. I hate that shifter
ten8goa 2 months ago
Do you guys send the TwinTurbo engines as crate engines overseas?
ManuelC572 2 months ago
@ManuelC572 Yes they do.
Mendooranite 2 months ago
hella teaser, first install windshield then take video !!!!!
420workinman 2 months ago 6
dood tom nelson is a FUCKING GENIOUS, if there were a god of engines this would be him, tom build my car you can do anything . lets put a v8 boosted in my integra...............something new...
demshion23 3 months ago in playlist Favorite videos 14
one day... beast like this will be mine. King of the road.
uroswolf 3 months ago 2
I know its not complete, but damn that looks like it would be uncomfortable to test drive
330bossman 3 months ago
people have MONEY!!!
sicknick12345 3 months ago
metal seats?
MaxAmaSity 3 months ago
the camera man was trying hard to not just jump into the drivers seat and take off when he stopped to get his hat LOL
akaLops444 3 months ago
572 vs 376?
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 This is what i am trying to tell you, when it comes to all out racing, use the tools that God has given you. Dont sit there and cry about oh but your motor is bigger. These are the advantages of big motors, not much rev is needed to make big power.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb I am not crying about it. Simply stating that using a 572ci engine to prove a point to me isn't the best idea...
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 Again to me i think if i can make 2200hp @ 28psi of boost and leave more room to grow form there on that is a better solution than having 2500hp @ 50psi reving to 10k rpms and maxing out the builds capability
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb Once again you are reading things wrong. No where does the article state it takes 50psi of boost to make 2500hp and needing to rev up to 10k rpms.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 to make 2500hp out of a 6.2 litre he is going to have to boost that thing pretty hard, its not going to be achievable at 28lbs of boost, thats for sure.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb Obviously
pier456 3 months ago
@osirisvb im guessing 38-41psi of boost.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 38-41 psi of boost? I dont know, until he does it those figures are just speculation.
osirisvb 3 months ago
moving passed big displacement engines being able to rev higher will give more pros then cons..
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 How? benefits of low rpm motors is
1) Lower rpm cruising speeds, so your engine is barely working to attain cruise speeds
2) Available torque from very low rpms, instead of having to develop it at 7500-10k rpm range
3) immediate acceleration
4) more fun.
5) smoke those guys who think 10krpm is the bestest..lol
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb more fun is personal opinion immediate acceleration depends on the setup and its gearing a guy with 10krpm range could smoke those guys with 6k rpms as well.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 so why doesnt the GTR use a 10k RPM rev limit? why does it red line at 7000rpm and I bet the automatic transmission shifts way before 7k rpms? Why does it make so much power so easily? why didnt Nissan choose to make it 10k rpms?
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb And what is the point of this? Doesn't disprove anything. Why would bugatti built a 2 ton luxury car to go for a top speed record?
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 I dont see how your buggati analogy has anything to do with the rev range that we are talking about. My quesiton is why does Nissan not use 10k rpms if it is so much more better as you stated, the GTR shifts right around 6.8-7k rpms why not rev it to 10k rpms?
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb because Nissan chose not too? never said you should build a production car with a 10k rpm range...
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 So by your theory, the GTR engine will not last long because it makes peak power at the lower rpm range than reving to 10k rpms correct?
osirisvb 3 months ago
turbo charged 7 427 v8 with a 8k rpm range would be perfect mix.
pier456 3 months ago
just examples
pier456 3 months ago
If you can have a high reving big displacement v8 that is done up well you pretty much have your cake and eating it too...
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 Not really, again depending on how that big v8 is making its power, if it is N/A then reving it to a higher rpm to make big power is needed, but if its boosted you dont have to rev it to higher rpms, especially when you have displacement to work with.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb so whats the benefits for lower rpms?
pier456 3 months ago
Besides matching where you have the best power curve is all where gearing and shift points come in.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 so now its about gearing and shift points? Well gearing and shift points are based where the motor makes its power. Not just you can put the longest gears on high reving engines.
osirisvb 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@osirisvb Which i just said...
"Besides matching where you have the BEST POWER CURVE is all where gearing and shift points come in.
pier456 3 months ago
Besides not like you have to rev to 10k anyways. if the engine is capable of 10k revs safely it will out last a engine that can safely rev to 6k. have both engines hold 4k rpms and see who lasts longer...
pier456 3 months ago
All motor setup 10k > 6k>
turbo setup pretty much any thing higher then 6k is better then 6k
only reason you wouldn't want a high reving engine is if your using a supercharger.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 Again depends on the motor, even with n/a there a big blocks capable of makin 820+ naturally aspirated, if all that power is available at 6rpm range you can kiss the 10k rpm car good bye. its all about the power under the curve.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb if you can have 820+ n/a with a great power band and rev to 10k it will be much better then if you only had 6k.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 nope, the 6k rpm motor will have developed all its power and put it to the wheels and gone ahead of the guy having to wait till 10k rpms coming around.
Besides high rpm = high compression = more stress on the internals because they are doing more work than a low rpm motor.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb that totally explains all those high rev turbo honda's... I am not talking about max power at 10k rpms or what ever you are trying to get at.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 yeah tell me when those high rev turbo honda's make 2200hp on 28lbs of boost @ the 6k rpm range.
So what is your point?
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb Why are you changing the subject. Just because its high reving doesn't mean 11++ compression ratio. I could careless if a high rev turbo honda could make 2200hp at 28lbs of boost etc. etc. or not.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 OMG you have no clue of how high rpm/ aka high reving engines work do you?
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb And how is that... You just stated what just said so if i don't have a clue you don't either.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 what i just said*
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 I didnt state what you just said, i stated 'you have no clue how a high rev engine' or for that matter of fact any engine works.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb trying to act smart doesn't move me either so try again...
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 Yes being smart with you is beyond your comprehension becasue you live in your little bubble. Just like how you think the GTR is the God's chariot.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb And where i said GTR is gods chariot lol.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 In your endless tirades of how the GTR is so superior etc etc in other videos. LOL!! too funny, anyways no 10krpms is not always nice to have.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@pier456 Again your whole idea of having 10krpm range is better is actually completely flawed, there are times when having a high rpm range helps and there are times when it is completely pointless. With big engines they dont have to rev so high to make big power.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb Obviously every setup isn't perfect. besides 10k rpm is just a example. A high revving engine is 8k and above. But their more pros then cons for having a higher rev range...
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 so what are the pros, tell me, lets hear it.? what are the pros of having a higher rev range?
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb Can support a bigger turbo
broader power band
A engine capable of reving up to 10k will be able to last longer then a engine capable of only 6k. Have both set at 6k rpms and the one built for 10k will last longer
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 'can support a bigger turbo' <-- well NRE proved that statement wrong, they achieved almost all of Chris Rados hp estimates with 28 psi of boost and at 6-7k rpm range.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb All you did was state psi and range not turbo size or anything.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 they used 91mm turbos, bigger than what Chris Rado is using on a low RPM motor.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb And also have more displacement right?
pier456 3 months ago
Unless theirs another ls9 that can safely rev up to 10k rpms and hold 50psi of boost...
pier456 3 months ago
I am not crying about anything. Saying you are trying to make things fair then compare a 572ci motor to 376ci motor is stupid. Doesn't prove anything. Compare a ls9 toa 3UR both modded and the 3UR will out do it.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 I dont think the 3ur will out do it, because it is a hypothetical comparison that has not taken place, so we really dont know what the result will be, anything else is pure speculations. Also when was having to rev to 10k rpm the end all and know of making power, id rather make it at 6000rpms and leave that 10krpm reving motor in the dust.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb Who said reving to 10k rpm the end of all making power? Whose talking about how much power at a certain rpm? being able to make power at 10krpms will always be better then only at 6krpms... Plus you have more room for bigger turbo setups...if it was pointless f1 cars wouldn't be reving up to 16k+ broader powerband ftw.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 Why is it better? what comes first ? 6k rpms or 10k rpms? If my engine makes its peak power at 6k rpms where as you have to rev to 10k rpms to make your power who do you think is going to win? Not the 10k rpm motor, The only reason high reving engines were made is because they reduced the displacement and made power at the upper end of the rpm range, without forced induction, btw high reving = high compression ratio = not very boost friendly. F1 cars are all small V10s n/a
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb Did someone forget about gearing and where the person shifts at? Lets drop a big turbo setup on our car now... Which is going to take advantage of it the most.. the 6krpms or 10k rpms?
btw that logic doesn't work... especially since i was talking about a high reving car on boost that isn't funny drag car...
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 Again the logic still works, the only problem is you fail to see it. Peak power at 6k rpm vs 10k rpm and if both engines are making the same power your 10krpm engine car will loose.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb i think you are missing the fact i wasn't talking about peak power.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 Then whats the point of all this rpm talk if you we are not talking about making power?
osirisvb 3 months ago
Which is why i said modded ls9
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 just making sure the tables are equal on both sides, not just the import side like you would love to have it.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb Coming from someone who compared a 572ci motor to a 376ci motor...
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 well if you are going to come in here and act like the 3ur is the best thing ever, you are going to get what you asked for. When you play a game where making the maximum power is the goal then dont limit your displacement. If you do and then cry about it, thats not the concern of the other party, just because they bought a bigger engine with two turbos. Sky is the limit, if your camp limits itself, doesnt mean everyone else should.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb i do not care what you are trying to get at with this. Bottom line you compared a 572ci motor to a 376ci motor end of story. i don't care about how nelsonracing isn't going to limit what engine size they use etc.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 Like i said the goal is to make max power, no one is telling Chris Rado not to use a 572ci, they chose to stick to a 376, NRE on the other hand doesnt conform to limits of a 376, not NREs fault and they dont have to apologize for it, to least of all people like you. So dont come in here crying about how NRE is using a 572ci, its all part of the game of making power. you use the tools you have to make the best possible power, simple as that.
osirisvb 3 months ago
why do i need to quote? i said i never said you thought that. I am not saying they shouldn't use the BB engine. idk how much power the ls9 has made but I'm sure the 3UR will give it a good run. Actually scratch that. with a 10k rpm range etc. yea the 3UR would defiantly out do a modded ls9...
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 Your missing one major point, the 3ur is heavily modified with added bore and stroke + being modified to reach 10k rpm range according to Chris Rado. In its production state the 3ur is merely a 5600rpm 381 hp engine, so lets do the same for the ls9. Why only have such rules for the 3ur, that is just a double standard, lets tear ls9 apart, bore and storke it as well then lets add two T88s on to the newly bored and stroked Ls9.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb Did you miss where i said modded ls9? Why are you complaining about this when you compared a 572ci to a 376ci motor?
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 Nothing to complain about just making sure if you bore and stroke a 350 cui to a 376 ci and call it fair then there can be Ls9 thats bored and stroked as well. If you want compare big power heavily modded engines you cant sit and cry about displacement.
osirisvb 3 months ago
never said you did just saying its not like this guy isn't credible in what he does. And of course a 500+ci bb is going to make insane power.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 Please quote where I said that? My only tiff with all this speculation is that people are thrusting numbers everywhere regarding this supra build when none of it is verified in reality. NRE on the other hand has verified #s on the dyno for many of their builds. Also NRE doesnt have to apologize for using bbs, if its there and they have the money to use it in your build, let them use it. Like i said ' No replacement for displacement'
osirisvb 3 months ago
And teh 3UR is going to be making well over 1000hp obviously.
pier456 3 months ago
Bottom line is chris rado isn't some random guy. Not like he hasn't built insane setups before. And if we are going to compare engines then compare a ls9 to the 3UR seeing as they both are 376ci motors.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 Never said Chris Rado was some random coughing up figures. All i said is dont come in here posting numbers that are unverified, and are for now 'hypothetically' thought of numbers.
But you dont assume NRE is some bunch of noobs. Of course with twin 76 turbos it better make over 1000hp.
osirisvb 3 months ago
Flowmasters have bad flow but cleshay sound... should have gone with a straight through chambered exhaust
ItalianStallionLouie 3 months ago
" Also just to clarify we are building this car to run the mile and other Top Speed runs so while driving this vehicle at anytime under 150mph we will only be running like 5-7psi which will easily net over 1000hp and boost will start climbing from there as drag and speed increases so will the boost pressure."
Just part of the post rado made in the comments
November 2, 2011 9:01 PM is date he commented
pier456 3 months ago
that's really a GREAT car with a beautiful motor!
superblyfresh 3 months ago
looks expensive !
Southcoast1958 4 months ago
If they´ll make that car an AWD just imagine the potential with those HP´s
kingcoapa 4 months ago
is this like a real motor or is it a 454 bored and stroked of wat is it
suzuki4life7 4 months ago
killer workmanship!
MKIIsleeper 4 months ago
lets see an import do this
askloglog 4 months ago
@askloglog Look up chris rados new car he's working on...
Twin turbo stroked Toyota 3UR-FE V8 making 2500hp in a supra.
Able to rev up to 10 grand and take 50psi of boost or more.... Fuel gonna be ethanol.
5-7psi of boost = over 1000hp...
street car...
3UR > Lsx
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 has there been any official dynos of this car? or are you just saying 2500hp because he guesstimates 2500hp? how do you know 5-7 Psi of boost = over 1000hp? Have they done dyno tuning of this? I have not seen any videos of this car on a dyno at all, its not street legal, It will fail all emissions. Dont BS on figures when the car is still not done.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb Or you can just look up teh guy and quit bitching to me like a 2 year old because another setup can make power without needing a nelson built engine...
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 I did look up the guy, and he hasnt done one single dyno test yet, so why are you pulling figures out of your ass?
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb I am not pulling figures out of my ass dumbass. Their from what HE has said. You got issues? Go try and contact him. I'm not wasting my time over some butt hurt guy. It what happens when Japanese v8's get worked on.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 Yeah so its a guesstimate. Here is a legitimate engine makeing almost that much power on 1/2 as much boost. I am not butt hurt, only challenge idiotic import fanbois like yourself who know next nothing about cars but walk around like you know something.
/watch?v=D_aS2cIfCTk <--2200+hp on 28psi of boost below 6500rpms, lets see your 3ur achieve that... thats what i thought.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb First off do you know if its a guesstimate? NO, second off you are comparing a 376ci motor to a 572 BB v8... Now what if the 3UR had 572ci of displacement? Thats what i thought.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 Yes it is a guesstimate for now until they come out and do some rigorous dyno testing like NRE does and capture it on video. You can come in here and tell us your beloved 3UR is much more better than NRE, but its NOT! NRE has being doing this for a long time 2500hp is not their end all and know all.
Also all these numbers being thrown around about this 3UR setup but again nothing like what NRE has done which is consistent proof. When i seen it Ill believe it.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb Then i guess you do not know the definition of guesstimating... Seeing as they never stated 2500hp WAS A GUESS.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 A guesstimate is an estimate, aka they estimate it will make 2500hp they dont know where they will be with that buiild, since no numbers have been posted. So until i see some videos and clear hard numbers all this bs you spew is nothing but rubbish
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb Once again go talk to the builders and not to me.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 YOu import fanbois are all about 'what ifs' , this is not a world of what ifs, point is your 3UR cant hold a candle to some of the beasts NRE builds, so dont come in here acting like your 3UR is the end all and know all of making power.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb Don't come in here acting like NRE builds are the end of all. You go compare a 572ci motor to a 376ci then try and say the 3UR doesn't hold a candle now? You're a complete dumbass.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 I never came in here and started anything you did like the typical ricer import fanboi you are. You cam in here flaunting your 3ur like it was the end all and know all of making power, i proved you wrong. Now STFU and realize your 3ur is NOT the end all and know of making power. NRE builds will blow it out of the water.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb You didn't prove anything, second i commented because someone said lets see a import do that, never said it was end all power.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 I proved that the 2500hp figure is for now a guesstimate, you have no proof to provide otherwise other than someones word. And words mean little in this game, you either put it up or shut up. NRE has 1000s of videos showcasing their ability, and 2200hp+ @ 28psi below 6300rpm. Ur 3ur isnt done yet, so stop talking trash.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb I'm not talking trash, once again why are you comparing a 572ci bb v8 to a 376 v8? Proves nothing.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 Once again, you came in here and started shit about how your 3ur > LSx or w.e that sillyness was that you posted, when you are working off nothing but hypothetical figures. Until they build it up, put it on the dyno and do some measurements its all a bunch hypothetical figures.
yes it does prove something ' NO replacement for displacement'
osirisvb 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@osirisvb i couldn't give a rats ass about the no replacement for displacement crap.
pier456 3 months ago
@osirisvb which btw the 3UR can handle 50psi of boost. Never stated it took that much boost to make the power they stated.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 Yeah cuz i got time to go and contact Chris Rado or w/e his name is. The reason why they say 2500hp is because they 'estimate' aka 'guesstimate' it can hit 2500hp, but none of this is going to make any ones head boggle until they prove it can do what they estimate or aka guesstimate it to do.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@osirisvb Then drop it and wait instead of getting butt hurt.
pier456 3 months ago
@pier456 No one is butt hurt just showing you to stop jumping into assumptions when a baseline figure has not even been established.
osirisvb 3 months ago
@pier456 And i read that article btw, nowhere did he mention 5-6 psi will yield 1000hp, So that was a figure you were just pulling out of your ass.
osirisvb 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@osirisvb I guess you never went through the comments.
pier456 3 months ago
it doesnt hook at all ive seen this car driven it just fries the tires off
jjnichols005 4 months ago
@jjnichols005 fuk off hater,,,,,,what do u drive pooooof
officerofftap 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@officerofftap im not hating, this car is being built at the shop i work at. ive seen this car driven it just fries the tires off
jjnichols005 4 months ago
Beautiful.
SYSPLUCK 4 months ago
Complete waste of power here, but this absolute artwork.
iPROFITDON 4 months ago in playlist More videos from nelsonracingengines
Might as well be a front wheel drive now looks like you can get in there to work on it now.
dunn98632 4 months ago
Tom your craftmanship is unmatched, the levels you've taken combustion too is awesome, so can you .....fine tune my wife? u know good blower, mabe TT and ahhh... brakes awe yaa big stoppen brakes....please!!!! lol Nice Work
Mrgdwordsmith 4 months ago
i LOVE this car!!!
adam318i 4 months ago
For the level of fab work on the rest of the car the intercoolers look like what you see come with some cheap kit from pepboys.
jodatetu 5 months ago
hat off to this build litteraly
5150santana 5 months ago
a 509, oooh snap!
lanatureestbelle 5 months ago
How does it hook with that kind of wheels and tires. I like them but everybody tells me I will have horrible traction. Is that true?
Hirthirthirt 5 months ago
I've honestly preferred 2 nice lateral straight pipes for the exhausts...
rEaLeRiS93 5 months ago
i would have left the interior like that , save a few hundred pounds , and get a true mad max look inside!
pipus4444 6 months ago
sexy looking engine !
pipus4444 6 months ago
TOM NELSON IS THE BEST. I JUST WISH I COULD GET HIM TO DONATE A 400 PONTIAC FOR THE GTO MY WIFE AND I ARE BUILDING.
surf403 6 months ago
The attention to detail is amazing.. And it idles under 1,000rpm.
TLRMAN12 6 months ago
The attention to detail is amazing..
TLRMAN12 6 months ago
ILL MOB IN IT JST LIKE DAT!
xXSPITZENXx 6 months ago
love how they show you underneath the car every inch of this car is tuned not just tint the windows and a big exhaust like people in the ghetto they think there car is the SHIT!a big exhaust chrome wheels tinted windows and a wing doesnt make there car 1000HP.thumbs up if you agree with me
nyelement007 6 months ago
So what kind of transmission holds back the wrath of Tom Nelson?
MrBowtie95 7 months ago
without the grill it looks like a olds
DEATH94SQUAD 7 months ago
road car? has a 1700 stall with twin turbos. how do you get off the line? or is it set up as asort of tc system so you dont over spin the street tires?
jnwmja 7 months ago
Nelson Racing Engines are the Shit!!!! Truely Top of the Line!
but199018 8 months ago
OMG!!! I bet they charge a two arms and a dick to build them rides!
but199018 8 months ago
As INFECTIOUS GROOVES says : "violent and funky"
homenucleonic666 8 months ago
i wish i lived in america ..
EclipseBiscuits 8 months ago
This car would look great in my garage
bugattiveyron2009 9 months ago
@bugattiveyron2009 not you too bro not you too :D
softazz 8 months ago
Tom Cant wait to see that done with upholstery Got to be Great! Sir David
sixtiesforever1966 9 months ago
2 sets of fuel rails on each side? 16 injectors? Makes me wish i was rich.
EliteLX 9 months ago
And i dont meen shit bad i meen shit seriously good!
jplumber100 9 months ago
Every thing this guy does is like nothing else serious serious shit
jplumber100 9 months ago
This is one slick trick ride! Thumbs up~
candorguy 9 months ago
Is this for sale? If so, how much?
ceerocky 10 months ago
How much?
ceerocky 10 months ago
0:11 SO beautifull! Love the metal look and the fact that you haven't coverd/hidden the boltheads on the intake!
Xaevi 10