This is all a game of words and nomenclature. There is enough truth mixed into this to make it just dangerous enough to fool the uneducated in matters of law.
Don't try this bullshit in court, because it doesn't hold up.
u idiots need to stop worring about common law and the UCC and get some common sense....THE UCC HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL USC VIOLATIONS!!!
This video is misleading. Common law is not recognized and outright rejected in the State of Florida. Each state has its own opinions so this guys blanket statements are dangerous.
@MickScarborough Where the "common law" is (was) not much more that "common sense" in that it was the customs among the people, adopted by "rulers" via "judicial systems" and further expanded, and expanded, and then corrupted in so many ways, what you speak of would be all the corrupted "add-ons" placed as a carpet over it all - where the foundation is seen as "problematic" and are judged "non grata"
In sum: it is all assumptions and boasts made valid by "peoples belief in it".
I thought the little girl in the beginning was going to say,..."this is a Nitty Beat.." Then young joc comes in .... "ask me questions like joc where you stay i tell them college park where they chop cars..."" hahahA
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..my Island of the Freetards idea is completely serious. Do it. Show the world what a civilized society should look like. Maybe then people will take you seriously. First though, you need to decide which of the stupid beliefs to keep, and which to discard. Ah, the irony of a Freetard debate about what color to draw up the new agreements, whether to have ID, and if so whether to use CAPS or not....
@mapache11 Yes, we would all be better off owning our personal responsibility, rather than being slaves of a legal and financial system that is by nature violent and oppressive. Seems to me that a valid point stands on its own and is in no need for 'word play', name calling or commands from Tards CAP&COLORS LOL The fact that you use a violent phrase to explain 'your take' on personal sovereignty is telling. We both agree that when a person is attacked, he has the right to defend himself...
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..We would all be better off owning up to our personal responsibility...Period. I didn't invent the stupidity (CAPS and COLORS, birth vs berth, what "person"means etc) that the Freetards believe, I'm just repeating it. So I hope your LOL is directed at them. The quote I paraphrased is not violent. In typical Freetard fashion you twist it. What seems to escape you again and again is the message behind it. Also in typical Freetard fashion you fail to address my questions:
@mapache11 Threatening someone is an act of violence and as far as I know a criminal offense. Humour does not translate well in text. You provided me with an explanation of "your understanding" of personal sovereignty with text describing violence, and did not answer the question with your thoughts, you answered with a borrowed phrase... So you say self defense is personal sovereignty, you would defend you body, but not your home?
@JonathanSeagullUtube ... since you are selectively illiterate, here once again are my thoughts on personal sovereignty. Everyone has the right to do whatever they choose to do provided that it does not affect anyone else in a negative way. Is that clear enough ,fuckstain?
@mapache11 "Everyone has the right to do whatever they choose to do provided that it does not affect anyone else in a negative way" wha you hurt my feeling when you said apache is a fuckwad... If you really believe in that, tell me in what negative ways these "Freetards" have effected you (or the world).
@mapache11 In what way have "freetards" negatively effected you? Did a close friend get "owned" by one? Perhaps the system you presently defend may unravel this winter...Halloween in the USA is shaping up to be one huge masquerade...
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...I know how the fiat system works. I know why it was created. I said before, my family, like countless others, went from poverty to comfort within the system we have now. You need to explain what system YOU want to see. Send it by PM if the space limitiation in the comments is a pain. I can't wait for the laughs when I read how you will change the world.
I hate fuckwits in general, and Freetards all into that category.
@mapache11 Software: Participatory Transparent Democracy where everyone gets to vote on issues they feel are important. Ask 99% of the billions on earth "what do you want in life" basically we all want: a secure place to stay, food, friends, access to knowledge and something to do (usually an activity that contributes to friends/society). The "poverty to comfort" was accomplished by technical advances, not a system of debt. This Halloween in the USA is shaping up to be one big scary ride...
@mapache11 Software: Participatory Transparent Democracy where everyone gets to vote on issues they feel are important. Ask 99% of the billions on earth "what do you want in life" basically we all want: a secure place to stay, food, friends, access to knowledge and something to do (usually an activity that contributes to friends/society). The "poverty to comfort" was accomplished by technical advances, not a system of debt. This Halloween in the USA is shaping up to be one big scary ride...
@SlipAllCityToy ...I'm glad you like it. I can't take credit for the word, and I don't remember where I first saw it. The lowest form of argument would be "opinion". For example my opinion could be Muhammed Ali was the greatest heavyweight champion.
Actually, calling the FMOTL "Freetards"is insulting the mentally challenged that were once referred to as retarded. At least they can be taught, they realize when they are wrong, and they know what a "person"is.
@SlipAllCityToy ...I'm glad you like it. I can't take credit for the word, and I don't remember where I first saw it. The lowest form of argument would be "opinion". For example my opinion could be Muhammed Ali was the greatest heavyweight champion. Actually, calling the FMOTL "Freetards"is insulting the mentally challenged that were once referred to as retarded. At least they can be taught, they realize when they are wrong, and they know what a "person"is.
The case below was ruled in we, the citizens favor and upheld our rights to the 10th and 9th amendment to the constitution. If you want to be truly free read the ruling and understand the importance of your sovereignty.
BOND v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 09–1227. Argued February 22, 2011—Decided June 16, 2011
if i get a ticket for no license and i sign it without prejudice and go on my way and then can i request a trial by jury? .it seems if you let them know that you know they will drop it
Well a capital offense usually violates common law and a commercial value may not apply because no matter what the price it could never repay the debt of a murdered person. What is the value of a human life? You must pay through penance or a portion of your life or all of your life.
UCC AND COMMON LAW IS REAL!!!!! LOL... I think what you meant to say is that. The UCC AND COMMON LAW ARE REAL. Or that "THE UCC AND COMMON LAW, IT IS REAL.
I hope your not using ebonics in your motions. Judges will never take you seriously. Whether your right or not. They do what they want and claim judicial immunity even if they are operating outside of their judicial authoritive powers or are violating their oath to office and committing treason against the constitutional United States. I know they did it to me. But I think the judge will be suprised when he gets that nice commercial lien against his property or his bond.
You are right. You have to, however have your Sovereign Rights established with at least a Superior, perferribly a Federal Judge before you go to court. That Bibb Co judge knows this very well(He is a contractor under UCC), but the lawyer had already stepped foot into the judges or maritime contract., leaving his/her rights on land(common law) to the laws of maritime (law of water) Ask me and I shall teach you.
All are part of the BAR Assiciation, next secret thing to Adolf Hilter himself.
You are right. You have to, however have your Sovereign Rights established with at least a Superior, perferribly a Federal Judge before you go to court. That Bibb Co judge knows this very well(He is a contractor under UCC), but the lawyer had already stepped foot into the judges or maritime contract., leaving his/her rights on land(common law) to the laws of maritime (law of water) Ask me and I shall teach you.
Too bad you forgot about states rights in the United States of America. Common Law is crap as well as your U.C.C. or uniform commercial code that has to deal with contract or civil court cases. Criminal codes and the REAL law of these United States does not recognize this garbage. Same thing with Sovereign Citizens who think that they are above the law. Yes we adopted some verb-age and laws from the English, but I guess you morons forgot about the American Revolution.
@MrTrburns4 ..You know why none of the freetards replied to your comment? It is too clear and concise. They prefer to use the "Bullshit Baffles Brains" style of argument. Semantics are the key to their whole FOTL mythology. Cop: "Do you UNDERSTAND the charges?" Freetard answer "No sir, I do not STAND UNDER them." Your name in all CAPS is not really you. You are not a person, you have a person.
The ridiculous thing about this video is that a simple google search for "common law" or "Uniform Commercial Code" will show anybody that the information in this vid is completely bogus, but for some reason people are still buying into it. It's amazing that in an age where all information is accessible in a matter of minutes, people still suffer from self-imposed ignorance and buy into ridiculous crap like the kind being fed to them in this video.
@ThisIsTheRealSkinny yes alot of people think it is a get out of jail free card, it can only help against the bias giant corrupt machine of the courts and their lawyers. there is buying into anything being sold or there is cross referencing too. I do not speak out of my ass, and people who try to bring UCC into basic proceedings get schooled by the Judge that works for a foreign institution and not for the state/people get confused or tongue tied.
@ThisIsTheRealSkinny ...the thing about Freetards is that they are impervious to logical thought. Tough to debate someone who thinks that upper and lower case names, and even the color of the ink you sign with mean anything at all. The guys who invented this shit must be laughing and laughing at the idiots who believe it.
@JonathanSeagullUtube ... If you are talking about documents where the given names only have the first letter in upper case, and the surname in all caps, it is to distinguish between the two. When both names are all caps, it is a pain in the ass to keep moving between upper and lower case when you are inputting hundreds, if not thousands, of names every day. In fact, my mom's birth certificate, from the 1940's, is written by hand, and it is not in all caps.
@mapache11 I guess it would be no problem if you had a note from a doctor saying you had Hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia and would only comply if your name was spelled the way it is in 99% of all that is written in accordance with the rules of written English (other than any CAPITALIZED use, as in government, credit cards etc) LOL. Perhaps the courts are acting a little rebellious to insist on going against the rules of English grammar ? LOL Is the NAME issue about personal sovereignty?
@JonathanSeagullUtube ......if there were some giant governmental plot to use your name as collateral, then they would issue a standardized birth certificate, like they do with passports. Birth certificates are different everywhere and change their appearance too. Example. My mom and dad were born after 1930. They were born three years apart in towns right next to each other. My dad's birth certificate is on a 8.5 x11 sheet of blue paper, all typed and everything in caps..not just names.
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..My mom's birth certificate is on a 4x6 piece of white paper, and all the information was handwritten in pen. First letters being the only letters capitalized. So according to the Freetards, my dad is chattel, and my mom isn't. ROFLMFAO.
In addition to this, there have been literally hundreds of thousands of politicians, lawyers, judges, and cops that would have to know about the "plot" and yet none of them use the info to protect themselves in court.
@mapache11 Is the "plot" you speak of more in the lines of "crown" continuing their 'control' over the 'freetards'? Many people lack understanding that they have the ability to assume control over their own personal sovereignty. Who do you think signs a death warrant ? Perhaps you are an individual who has the ability to choose whether you pay 'tax' and where the tax dollars gets spent on..."hundreds of thousands of politicians, lawyers, judges, and cops" ARE the court, which protects itself.
@JonathanSeagullUtube ....really, then why, when politicians, lawyers, judges, cops, and people who run the stock markets are caught doing something illegal, from drunk DRIVING, to cheating on their own taxes (which they obviously wouldn't be paying if there were a plot..but I digress) have they NEVER, not once, since the plot began over 75 years ago, ever used any of the Freetard tactics to avoid punishment of any kind??? They are AWESOME secret keepers.
@mapache11 I totally agree with you that arguing the CAPITALIZATION "secret" in a court of law is silly. The issue of personal sovereignty is an entirely different matter, which you have, for some reason chosen not to address in our discussion...perhaps you have an emotional attachment to the present system of oppression. Perhaps you either enforce stupid laws (all laws except the obvious ones that deal with violence onto others) or are involved in the legal system...sock puppets are tards2!
@mapache11 "drunk DRIVING" = higher than normal potential for inflicting violence on others = criminal behavior. "cheating on their own taxes" = most "taxes" goes to pay for oppression. If you lost your ability to pay for the rent/mortgage of your home of 40 years, and men in costumes arrived to physically remove you and you refused to be homeless, you can be put in jail for resisting, and can legally be shot to death...is that the "avoid punishment of any kind" you speak of ?
@JonathanSeagullUtube ... I'll make this simple for you. If what Freetards believe is true, that being that a) we don't have to pay taxes and b) your name in all caps is not you, then why have no politicians, lawyers etc who have been caught breaking ANY FUCKING LAW AT ALL, ever used any of the Freetard arguments in court. EVER. and how have they managed to keep this all a secret from Michael Moore. I know you agree that the caps idea is silly, but it what they BELIEVE.
@mapache11 Yes, no one in a free society is required to have their blood & sweat (money) taken without consent. Who signs a death warrant? As far as I understand the only person who can sign a death warrant is the person being killed. What are your thoughts on 'personal sovereignty'?
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...Freetards live in a fantasy world where everyone treats each other respectfully all the time. Everyone is honest, hardworking and wants to share what they have. Despite the fact that the world isn't like that, my family and thousands of other families have gone from poverty to a relaxed upper middle class life in three generations. There are things about the system that aren't perfect, but freetards only need to look at Somalia to see what happens with no government.
@mapache11 Untards live in a fantasy world where terrorists run rampant and the only way to control the masses is by more laws, Untards are great proponents of juicy items like the patriot act. In an economy based on rewarding "the best" inevitably most people step on others to 'get ahead'. One only needs to look at Zimbabwe to see what happens with "lots" of "representatives" who enable unregulated money issuing by the likes of the Federal Reserve. Look at Somalia, send in the drones...
@mapache11 "drunk DRIVING" = higher than normal potential for inflicting violence on others = criminal behavior. "cheating on their own taxes" = most "taxes" goes to pay for oppression. If you lost your ability to pay for the rent/mortgage of your home of 40 years, and men in costumes arrived to physically remove you and you refused to be homeless, you can be put in jail for resisting, and can legally be shot to death...is that the "avoid punishment of any kind" you speak of ?
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...wow you are one for the books. Although it is quite the strawman you have entered into the discussion I will address it. If I am renting my home, that means that I have signed a contract to pay every month to live there. In said contract it is clearly stated that if I don't pay, i can be forced to leave. If I borrowed the money to pay for a home, again I signed a contract to pay it back. If I don't, again I can be forced to leave.
@mapache11 Even in (virtually all) contractual arrangements, there is no indication that violence can/will be used in the event of default. IF there is indication of violence as a tool within contract, that is agreeing to perpetrating a criminal offense...a contract that is not in accordance with the law is not a contract under law, a best, an agreement among untards...
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...Untards live in the real world. It isn't perfect by any means, but it is REAL. Freetards think that by playing with semantics they will change human nature. Good luck with that. I can explain my feeling on personal sovereignty with an old analogy. "My right to swing my fist around ends at the tip of your nose."
A great many laws are made because of knuckleheads with no common sense. Communism rewards mediocrity. How many people are defecting TO Cuba or China?
@mapache11 So personal sovereignty to you means perpetrating violence...are you a cop? A great many laws are made to assume financial control. There is no such thing as "human nature", only human behavior, behavior is fluid and fairly consistent with outside influences. Communism? Can you say "Bail out" or "corporate welfare"? Guess how many US dollars USED TO BE owned by China? Guess how much USA rental property, land, businesses and banks have been purchased by China in the last 4 years?
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..every loan contract or rental agreement I've signed has spelled out clearly what the consequences are for failing to pay. Of course they don't mention violence, fuckwit. But if I don't pay my rent and the police are called because the landlord couldn't evict me, and Istill refuse to leave, the police are within their rights to use whatever force is necessary to evict me. If I am sitting on my sofa, they can carry me away. if I threaten them, they can shoot me.
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..every loan contract or rental agreement I've signed has spelled out clearly what the consequences are for failing to pay. Of course they don't mention violence, fuckwit. But if I don't pay my rent and the police are called because the landlord couldn't evict me, and Istill refuse to leave, the police are within their rights to use whatever force is necessary to evict me. If I am sitting on my sofa, they can carry me away. if I threaten them, they can shoot me.
@mapache11 Your right to a home is somehow less than the right of a cop to kill you...riiight. That only works if you are employed as a cop...or a landlord...or part of the system that prefers the rights of money over humanity...
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...you are quickly achieving status as the biggest whackjob at youtube. People have the right to do anything that does infringe on anyone else's rights. Is that simple enough for you?? What SHOULD a landlord do if someone refuses to pay rent?
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..Please do society a favor, go gather the other Freetards, pool all your resources, buy an island, and live happily ever after without any fear of taxes, rent, or cops.
Human nature, human behaviour. You are never going to change either human nature or human behaviour by playing with words.
@mapache11 Seems to me that a valid point stands on its own and is in no need for 'word play', name calling or commands from tards to "go elsewhere"...Perhaps I AM a reflection of the future of SOCIETY where violence is the #1 crime and cops become peace officers, highly trained in dispute resolution. I would love to see an island where all the nasty little (or big) fist swinging macho types can choose to live and kill each other: best-est killer takes all...
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...With regards to the fist swinging and noses, it was Oliver Wendell Holmes who first stated that. Not me. The fact that you took it literally is sadly telling. Nowhere have I promoted violence. I have stated that if a person threatens someone with violence, then the threatened person has a right to defend themself. I am sure that in the future there will be no more greed, theft, rape ,or any other crime. We will all live a world full of love and peace. Keep waiting.
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...1) If a person refuses to pay rent, and the landlord cannot get the person to leave, what should the landlord do? 2) How has the "truth", that must be common knowledge among all politicians, lawyers, judges, etc etc been kept from the masses for so long and why do none of the people in those lines of work that deal in and with the "truth" ever use any of its loopholes to escape the consequences of any illegal activities they have been caught doing?
@mapache11 1) There is no need to perpetrate violence in a free society: we do not live in a free society, therefor, as you indicate, violence is the only answer. 2) I have very little knowledge of this "truth" you speak of. What do I understand is that too few people are in a position of power over the masses. This "authority" seems to function on a "do as I say, not as I do" mentality. This obedience to authority breeds financial terror, physical violence and oppression.Violence is criminal
@mapache11 1.) In the present society violence is the answer, as it is built into the illusion of fiat currency. 2.) I have no idea what your question is as I do not consider myself, as you claim a "Freetard" and as a result do not know the info in the strange talk you are talking about (colors, allocation of HOUSES, APARTMENTS, BUSINESSES AND LAND ARE FREE FOR THE TAKING for one person called a Freetard or what ever your ideas are)
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..if you believe the bullshit this video expounds, then yes you are a Freetard. The gold standrard did not prevent violence. People owned property, people rented property. People lost homes if they didn't repay loans. They were evicted for not paying rent. The fiat system did not have nay effect on human BEHAVIOUR.
@mapache11 I believe portions of what this video expounds has validity. Like you say a lot of it is BS. The fiat system is based on debt currency supply. The banks create the money into existence and demand back more than they created, mathematically, someone has to default, as there is not enough money to pay back the "interest" no matter how "hard working & honest" you are. To create the money supply & demand that more than what was created is financial terror.
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...only a moron would get shot over refusing to pay their rent. I have never heard of it happening, but since YOU brought it up, I assume that you are fuckwitted enough to sign a rental agreement, stop paying rent, refuse to leave the property, then pull a gun on the police that go to help the landlord.
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..Please do the sane people in society a favor and pool your money with other Freetards, get an island and go live happily ever after without fear of taxes, rent, or cops.
@mapache11 In the case of 'common law', does it matter if the last name is all capitalized or not? Is the whole story about admiralty law re: Signed birth certificate by parent = child is then considered abandoned chattel at sea and now property of the state just BS? Is the whole story re: "to capitalize" merely a fable, and the meaning ("to capitalize" on a situation) mere coincidence ? Is it untrue that the stock market buys and sells (capitalizes on) birth certificates?
@mapache11 Answers: no = true, yes = false, yes = false, yes = false. One out of 4 aint bad. I agree it is tardish to argue CAPITALIZATION in court. To argue sovereignty is a totally different issue, and one freetards have a valid point about. course we both are not willing to do all the research to show who is true...so WE BOTH WIN...
nevermind all the naysayers they are corrupt or i mean lawyers and dont want you to know their tricks of the trade and are scared of losing money from dumb clients.
@3fty665 Do you mean leave? Or do you mean become a sovereign citizen. If you mean sovereign citizen then your going to stay here do every thing the same but refuse to pay taxes, break traffic laws and several other things that they do not believe they should have to do.
ofcourse common law exists, how stupid can people be? common law exists in all countrys.Common law trumps all law. This should be taught in school however it is not because school , just like the media/ universistys / etc etc are all controlled by the corperate elite. Its a huge illusion scam perpetuated by the freemason illuminati and NWO to maintain our enslavement.
@JOINTHERESISTANCE1 A lot of common law does not apply to today's America. America changes meaning its law also needs to change to fit advancements of technology and such.
@Frowardkiller you keep misinforming people to get more clients "todays america" . are you fucking serious with that talk? we both know the patriot act opened a gateway for the corrupt. so "todays america" UCC is much more applicable than it ever was. so tell me what purpose do you serve trying to mislead people?
@letsgoforajoyride I misunderstood what common law was at first i thought it was referring to the constitution or something i did some reading and saw that its based on old court cases. But common law can always change and contradict its self.
so can a lot of things contradict themselves thats why you got to know and keep up to date and know which things fit together and which ones they rewrote because people were catching on and firms were losing clients, but they will always leave loops so they can bail out their corrupt buddies so those are available to use to just we have alot more pulling teeth today because we or at least some of us are not in the grind and pay 10k+ a year just to have a title that any monkey can easily attain.
@letsgoforajoyride By your definition is it not up to the judge then if to use common law? Judges rulings are what makes common law right? So the judges dont really have to make rulings based on common law but use it as a reference or am i wrong?
@Frowardkiller hmm? you are trying to confuse things again? Judges are Common Laws bitch to put it bluntly and they do not like talking about it because they lose that commission of the ticket they are overseeing so to protect their investments and all the lawyers they all sway you into bullshit and say pleading guilty is the very best thing u can do (to fuck yourself royally)
@letsgoforajoyride Then im not trying to mislead people "Judges are Common Laws". As you see you are saying the same thing i am. When its pretty clear the person has broken the law and their is a mountain of evidence against them im sure the lawyer would say its better for the person to plead guilty. Their investment is getting you free if they are your lawyer. If they purposely get you thrown into prison then they can go to jail and your case gets a new hearing.
@Frowardkiller well lawyers do purposely and obligataroy to the states and court /government to make it seem like you are getting a bargain when in fact the poor sap is not even guilty to begin with because many rights and laws have been broken that noone will call upon or are too afraid to call things out or if they do get stumped by the lawyer language and just give in. The UCC was created to protect criminals in business than through criminal which intertwine thank god to the patriot act.
@letsgoforajoyride "well lawyers do purposely and obligataroy to the states and court /government to make it seem like you are getting a bargain when in fact the poor sap is not even guilty to begin with" Or they could be guilty and deserve what they get. Stop trying to defend the criminals that mess up their own life. Plenty of banks and or big business get charged with crimes and do jail time.
@letsgoforajoyride thanks for exposing yourself by using jon stewart , a wash out comedian to backup your theory and prove my point you dont know law.
@letsgoforajoyride Lol the UCC has nothing to do with day to day laws in America. Your referring to the crap pot theories that people have. None of it is proven. Jon Stewart showed how funny you people are. Its just sad of you type of people. Im glad for the patriot act. The government is finally starting to crack down on extremists its about time for these terrorists to be dealt with.
UCC can be used in court, you have to "stand" in common law jurisdiction. I sign any government paperwork with an explicit reservation of rights and have had tickets signed this way dismissed pursuant F.R.C.P. Rule 12, the "court" has no jurisdiction. Add the other 3 conflicts of interest and its no win for the court when you know your rights/duties/allegiances. Would a competent man agree to a unilateral contract that isn't beneficial to himself? The rules are simple, no crime victim, no crime.
Videos like this make niggaz look so stupid factual right poorly presented with shaky knowledge on the subjects yes they're universal laws but common law stems from the magna carta read a book before doing a video you're making me look bad
This video is meant to confuse the issue. Common law and the U.C.C.(Uniform Commercial Code) are not one and the same. The U.C.C. was not published until 1952. Look up common law vs. Admiralty Law.
I have an incredibly hairy ass so what I do on hot days is I insert my fingers into the leaky moist asscrack lengthwise then flex allowing all the bumjuice to absorb onto the skin of my fingers. After 5 minutes I then remove my bumjuice soaked fingers from my moist butthole and proceed to lick up all the bumjuice. The licking actually enhances the scent of the bumjuice so I always take a big wif.What bumjuice is left on my skin and under my fingernails I scrape off with my teeth
I'm shocked at how many people believe that the laws don't apply to them.
If you are a US Citizen, are bound to uphold the laws of the US. Just look at the N-400, the form people fill out to become naturalized citizens. It clearly states that, as a citizen, one "bears true faith and allegiance" to "the Constitution and laws of the United State of America."
So you consent to be governed by being a CITIZEN. If you don't want to be governed by US law, renounce your citizenship and move away.
@cain308 They are not Laws, just like the patriot act which violates the fourth amendment is not a law. It's maratime admiralty commerical codes. There is a big differnece between being a citizen and a resident. Guess which is the slave.
if you need common law explaining see John Harris just an illusion on the tpuc.org website....... statute law is naval law and does not have any lawful standing upon land
This video is clearly barking up the wrong tree. If common law is some superior unwritten evolved set of laws, then why is common law marriage recognized in 14 states and not 50? Answer because it is so defined by the statutory law of those states. Because statutory law is superior to common law.
@maemorri to break this down to you deeper, Common Law is the Law of God , The Creator Of The Heavens and the Earth. This is where the founding fathers got their Constitution from. These so called state statues and constitutions are made of and now the Common Law is all but ignored. Look at this country and the mess it is in. Man marrying a man, woman marrying a woman, goes against the Common law of Leviticus. There are sooo many more to list I can't even begin. This place is the Babylon
@maemorri There you go, you've received your answer. They've elevated common law to "the Law of God" instead of just being a fancy term for "the precedents established by English courts over centuries that aren't all written down in one place but we kinda agree to respect." We established our statutory law based, to some degree, off of common law precedents. But that statutory law has the final say, which they don't seem to understand...
@JOINTHERESISTANCE1 dont argue with the lawyers man haha. they put alot on the line and took an oath to serve you and I bullshit instead of knowledge. Common Law making an appearance would be a serious blow to their firms and to the govt and that whole line of corrupt pricks. Even when we are right they will say we are wrong no matter how much proof and fact and living proof that UCC and Common Law applies is that it is still recognized and used, but not by prick lawyers like your talking to.
acts and statutes are not law ... they can only be applied by force of law when given the consent of the governed < thats us ... we have to consent to be governed by it and common law over rides all! including UCC on land
UCC is Uniform Commercial Code and that is basically the law of the sea or real property to deal with trading
Why take a position? The commonlaw/freeman guys are taking a postion that they are free or sovereign . Why take a positon? If someone else is taking a postion that you are not free the best and only stategy is to ask them simple questions like.... when,where, why, and how did you get control/jurisdiction over me? The fact is nobody is free/sovereign. They have the guns, police, armies, and uniforms. The commonlaw/freeman/ucc guys are fundamentally wrong in their assertions.
common law is not unwritten law. Common law is the body of decisional authority that has accumulated over the years and centuries dating back to old england. That is what is referred to as precedent. Murder is not a commercial charge. The UCC is not common law. All of your legal theories are so far off base that it would take pages to describe all of the errors. That is why you need an attorney. Sorry, welcome to reality.
common law is not unwritten law. Common law is the body of decisional authority that has accumulated over the years and centuries dating back to old england. That is what is referred to as precedent.
@301gunnar Weak ad hominen, but I guess that's the best you can do. Hey when the next Transformers movie is up for discussion, maybe you can chime in then, k Spanky?
@ ngonea - Right, keep telling the truth...these entities need our resources (human, monetary or otherwise) to survive...without criminal activity and over taxation, they would fall and become the ghost towns of the "Old West"...
Just ask skinny to put into context Title 28 Section 3002-Definition's of the US code at the very bottom-put that into perspective now with regards to your law.....Or go to dnb dot com and over at the search on the right of the page,type in "Congressman" or "Police" and look at all the investments you can make...mine says CONGRESSMAN(also traded as JIM TALENT) Or go to the SEC dot gov and do a corporation search..type in CANADA-yep traded,JAPAN-yep traded...you get the point.....try it out
@THAWK3 I'm sorry, I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Is there a specific definition from Title 28 you want me to look at? And what is it exactly that you want me to deduce from that definition?
@BrownEagle7 - that is right, it's all miitary tribunal and administravtive where your quilty until you prove othewise and if you do they can still hold you in contempt, it's all about collecting revenue for the U.S. Corporate BANKRUPTCY.bonds-insurance-trusts:
see Jean keating Prison Treatise, or How a Prisoner Funds America
I have heard this UCC thing and the STRAWMAN thing for years. I do legal research and have never found a instance where the courts abide or recognize it.
Now if it is the law and some evidence existe to support this, then like always the corrupt legal system is doing what it always does, whatever the hell it wants to!
I have seen many instances where lawyers don't even know the law, like for instance most civil judgments are void, due to the courts own interpretation of the law.
It mentioned Macon,GA. , I used to live in that corrupt ass backward place. I got the hell out of that city as well as the state of GA in 2009. I wasted 33 yrs of my life in that hellhole Bibb County. Some of the city council members have been on the city council for 30+ yrs and they fight like hell to keep outsiders from coming in, theres been many manufacturing companies turned away from building plants there costing the people jobs, they want to keep Macon small where Boss Hogs can rule
@BrownEagle7 - You don't have a frickin' clue as to what common law is. Has nothing to do with constitutional law. Take a law class, you might learn something!
@deathmarch5 - the other branches were created to oversee or better yet "guard" common law (Constitution) - The word constitution is what wakes you up every morning, (your constitution); now those branches have enslaved you by creating uncommon law and more laws than you care to think about...
@BrownEagle7 COMMON LAW HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CONSTITUTION.... AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "UNCOMMON LAW" THANKS FOR PROVING YOU ARE A CLUELESS LITTLE SHEEP...
@BrownEagle7 I think perhaps you're confused about what common law is. There are only two types of law: Common Law and Statute. Statutes are created by the legislative branch. Common Law is created by the judicial branch. This video is kind of ridiculous to anyone who understands the legal system because judges wouldn't ignore common law. They create it. If anything, they would ignore statutes. Whoever made this video knew absolutely nothing about common law or how it works.
if you have common sense then you understand common law ,its as simple as that ,its knowing right from wrong ,some people quote the bible for there common laws ..although ,i think the bible ,has a lot to learn about a lot of things before it starts preaching its common laws
The thing that's ridiculous about this video is judge's don't hate common law. They love it. Here's an important fact this video fails to mention. Statutes are created by legislators, Common Law is created by JUDGES. Which one do you think Judges prefer? If we got rid of statutes and the legislative branch, judges would LOVE it, because that would mean there's no one else in charge of the law but the judicial branch. They'd be free to run the legal system with nothing but common law.
Common Law exists but just like the original constitution, it is ignored. You have to fight and stand to win your rights in a system that devises schemes daily to usurp your authority as a sovereign. Lawyers are not needed if this process is respected and given its proper due process, so most attorneys will automatically quote a law or book the does not supersede common law in order to confuse the process. Many have success with common law but martial law is now our problem.
@BrownEagle7 That can be remedied with a writ of Quo Warantto and mandamus. By what authority? authority broken down in the law books called words and phrases says authority was a combination of 2 words author and writ. The author of the writ is the plaintiff and the sovereign in the suit his jurisdiction is the court that is how they have standing. Martial law is done by executive order which only historically has been used to order the government US citizens which are subjects to it.
@BrownEagle7 Never admit you are one unless you want to wave your sovereignty.As far as I am concerned I am an American National. That is my nationality that is my domicile I am not a resident of any state republic I am domiciled here a zip code authorized an admittance that you are a resident of the code thus a resident once your job is done you will return to your jurisdiction in other words you are an alien in your own land. check out 1215(dot)org great site of common law procedures
@BrownEagle7 You couldn't be more of a hypocrite right now. You claim to respect the original constitution, but you want to ignore the balancing of powers the constitution created and eliminate the legislative branch, and leave the judicial branch (all the judges) in charge of our legal system. There's a reason we have three branches of government. You can't claim to respect the constitution, but then say we should eliminate the legislative branch and let common law reign.
@Popejoy when you step through the swinging door in a court room, You are under Admiral Law jurisdiction and UCC, do not step through until you say to the judge, I claim common law jurisdiction, because then UCC and common law has to work in Harmony.Judge may ignore what you said,then start stateing the charges against you,JUST SAY: I do not consent and waive the benefits." need the meaning of that then contact me here on YouTube
@NLOLIN4Solar You clearly have major misunderstandings about common law. It's not something you claim. If there's no statute on point, a court is already obligated to follow common law. Before you speak further on this topic, it would be a good idea if you went on google or wikipedia and looked up the most basic definitions you can find of UCC and common law. Work from there and educate yourself.
@ThisIsTheRealSkinny -you are incorrect since 1860 and the Reconstruction Act, we have been under Martial Law, read the Elevent Amendment, the Judical branch was abolished, you now have Admin. /Military Tribunals, posing as Judges, they do not have jurisdiction to hear, Equity, in law or controversy cases. There is no common law since the US Inc was quit claimed to the UN in 1944, there is UCC or Admiralty Maritime Law
@ThisIsTheRealSkinny Not sure what made you an expert,But I am sure I have already looked it up on google, and yes if you do not claim common law jurisdiction then when you step thru- them swinging doors you are in the courts jurisdiction if you enter any plea you have contracted with the court, the charges allegedly against you are an offer to you.so say I do not consent and waive the benefits, think you need to go to Google or buy the video's from Winston Shrout because I got them all.
@NLOLIN4Solar "if you do not claim common law jurisdiction then when you step thru- them swinging doors you are in the courts jurisdiction"
See, right there. That's what I'm talking about. Common law jurisdiction IS the courts jurisdiction. That's where common law comes from. The courts. I would love to see your source that says otherwise.
This is more bullshit masquerading as legitimate.
This is all a game of words and nomenclature. There is enough truth mixed into this to make it just dangerous enough to fool the uneducated in matters of law.
Don't try this bullshit in court, because it doesn't hold up.
FoxeoGames 6 days ago
@FoxeoGames have you tried it?
D0W666 2 days ago
MURDER IS A COMMERCIAL CHARGE...STFU!!!!
brittboyer1 3 weeks ago
u idiots need to stop worring about common law and the UCC and get some common sense....THE UCC HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL USC VIOLATIONS!!!
brittboyer1 3 weeks ago
awesome video ... thanki you thank you .
goodfellow67216 1 month ago
This video is misleading. Common law is not recognized and outright rejected in the State of Florida. Each state has its own opinions so this guys blanket statements are dangerous.
MickScarborough 1 month ago
@MickScarborough Where the "common law" is (was) not much more that "common sense" in that it was the customs among the people, adopted by "rulers" via "judicial systems" and further expanded, and expanded, and then corrupted in so many ways, what you speak of would be all the corrupted "add-ons" placed as a carpet over it all - where the foundation is seen as "problematic" and are judged "non grata"
In sum: it is all assumptions and boasts made valid by "peoples belief in it".
Kenzofeis 1 month ago
I thought the little girl in the beginning was going to say,..."this is a Nitty Beat.." Then young joc comes in .... "ask me questions like joc where you stay i tell them college park where they chop cars..."" hahahA
dtownwarrior 2 months ago
I don't get the purpose of this video - who would ever deny the existence of UCC or common law in the US or UK?
lgarvey1979 3 months ago
@lgarvey1979 to PROSECUTE U!
LetFreedomSPK 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This guy is an Idiot.
gregorymaillis 3 months ago
Where can I find the Judge Hugh Lawson and Dr Malachi court transcrypt or footage?
wtfzwrong 3 months ago
i meant "does NOT infringe"
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 "i meant "does NOT infringe" that's what the cop said while under internal investigation...
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..my Island of the Freetards idea is completely serious. Do it. Show the world what a civilized society should look like. Maybe then people will take you seriously. First though, you need to decide which of the stupid beliefs to keep, and which to discard. Ah, the irony of a Freetard debate about what color to draw up the new agreements, whether to have ID, and if so whether to use CAPS or not....
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 Yes, we would all be better off owning our personal responsibility, rather than being slaves of a legal and financial system that is by nature violent and oppressive. Seems to me that a valid point stands on its own and is in no need for 'word play', name calling or commands from Tards CAP&COLORS LOL The fact that you use a violent phrase to explain 'your take' on personal sovereignty is telling. We both agree that when a person is attacked, he has the right to defend himself...
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..We would all be better off owning up to our personal responsibility...Period. I didn't invent the stupidity (CAPS and COLORS, birth vs berth, what "person"means etc) that the Freetards believe, I'm just repeating it. So I hope your LOL is directed at them. The quote I paraphrased is not violent. In typical Freetard fashion you twist it. What seems to escape you again and again is the message behind it. Also in typical Freetard fashion you fail to address my questions:
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 Threatening someone is an act of violence and as far as I know a criminal offense. Humour does not translate well in text. You provided me with an explanation of "your understanding" of personal sovereignty with text describing violence, and did not answer the question with your thoughts, you answered with a borrowed phrase... So you say self defense is personal sovereignty, you would defend you body, but not your home?
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ... since you are selectively illiterate, here once again are my thoughts on personal sovereignty. Everyone has the right to do whatever they choose to do provided that it does not affect anyone else in a negative way. Is that clear enough ,fuckstain?
mapache11 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mapache11 "Everyone has the right to do whatever they choose to do provided that it does not affect anyone else in a negative way" wha you hurt my feeling when you said apache is a fuckwad... If you really believe in that, tell me in what negative ways these "Freetards" have effected you (or the world).
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@mapache11 In what way have "freetards" negatively effected you? Did a close friend get "owned" by one? Perhaps the system you presently defend may unravel this winter...Halloween in the USA is shaping up to be one huge masquerade...
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...I know how the fiat system works. I know why it was created. I said before, my family, like countless others, went from poverty to comfort within the system we have now. You need to explain what system YOU want to see. Send it by PM if the space limitiation in the comments is a pain. I can't wait for the laughs when I read how you will change the world.
I hate fuckwits in general, and Freetards all into that category.
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 Software: Participatory Transparent Democracy where everyone gets to vote on issues they feel are important. Ask 99% of the billions on earth "what do you want in life" basically we all want: a secure place to stay, food, friends, access to knowledge and something to do (usually an activity that contributes to friends/society). The "poverty to comfort" was accomplished by technical advances, not a system of debt. This Halloween in the USA is shaping up to be one big scary ride...
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mapache11 Software: Participatory Transparent Democracy where everyone gets to vote on issues they feel are important. Ask 99% of the billions on earth "what do you want in life" basically we all want: a secure place to stay, food, friends, access to knowledge and something to do (usually an activity that contributes to friends/society). The "poverty to comfort" was accomplished by technical advances, not a system of debt. This Halloween in the USA is shaping up to be one big scary ride...
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@mapache11
"Freetard" a great way of using the lowest form of disagreement - name-calling to someone who believes in freedom.
I got a great laugh out of that word and will remember it.
SlipAllCityToy 4 months ago
@SlipAllCityToy ...I'm glad you like it. I can't take credit for the word, and I don't remember where I first saw it. The lowest form of argument would be "opinion". For example my opinion could be Muhammed Ali was the greatest heavyweight champion.
Actually, calling the FMOTL "Freetards"is insulting the mentally challenged that were once referred to as retarded. At least they can be taught, they realize when they are wrong, and they know what a "person"is.
mapache11 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SlipAllCityToy ...I'm glad you like it. I can't take credit for the word, and I don't remember where I first saw it. The lowest form of argument would be "opinion". For example my opinion could be Muhammed Ali was the greatest heavyweight champion. Actually, calling the FMOTL "Freetards"is insulting the mentally challenged that were once referred to as retarded. At least they can be taught, they realize when they are wrong, and they know what a "person"is.
mapache11 4 months ago
The case below was ruled in we, the citizens favor and upheld our rights to the 10th and 9th amendment to the constitution. If you want to be truly free read the ruling and understand the importance of your sovereignty.
BOND v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 09–1227. Argued February 22, 2011—Decided June 16, 2011
godbluffvdgg 5 months ago
if i get a ticket for no license and i sign it without prejudice and go on my way and then can i request a trial by jury? .it seems if you let them know that you know they will drop it
PatriotRadioMilitia 5 months ago
Constitutional Justice Law
pro se laws are common law
without prejudice 1-207
good faith or bad faith
OnNoEagle 5 months ago
Well a capital offense usually violates common law and a commercial value may not apply because no matter what the price it could never repay the debt of a murdered person. What is the value of a human life? You must pay through penance or a portion of your life or all of your life.
JeremyKilroy 7 months ago
UCC AND COMMON LAW IS REAL!!!!! LOL... I think what you meant to say is that. The UCC AND COMMON LAW ARE REAL. Or that "THE UCC AND COMMON LAW, IT IS REAL.
JeremyKilroy 7 months ago
I hope your not using ebonics in your motions. Judges will never take you seriously. Whether your right or not. They do what they want and claim judicial immunity even if they are operating outside of their judicial authoritive powers or are violating their oath to office and committing treason against the constitutional United States. I know they did it to me. But I think the judge will be suprised when he gets that nice commercial lien against his property or his bond.
JeremyKilroy 7 months ago
You are right. You have to, however have your Sovereign Rights established with at least a Superior, perferribly a Federal Judge before you go to court. That Bibb Co judge knows this very well(He is a contractor under UCC), but the lawyer had already stepped foot into the judges or maritime contract., leaving his/her rights on land(common law) to the laws of maritime (law of water) Ask me and I shall teach you.
All are part of the BAR Assiciation, next secret thing to Adolf Hilter himself.
ulcohatchee1959 7 months ago
You are right. You have to, however have your Sovereign Rights established with at least a Superior, perferribly a Federal Judge before you go to court. That Bibb Co judge knows this very well(He is a contractor under UCC), but the lawyer had already stepped foot into the judges or maritime contract., leaving his/her rights on land(common law) to the laws of maritime (law of water) Ask me and I shall teach you.
ulcohatchee1959 7 months ago
this is a worldwide thing not just America
britishgoose01 7 months ago
Too bad you forgot about states rights in the United States of America. Common Law is crap as well as your U.C.C. or uniform commercial code that has to deal with contract or civil court cases. Criminal codes and the REAL law of these United States does not recognize this garbage. Same thing with Sovereign Citizens who think that they are above the law. Yes we adopted some verb-age and laws from the English, but I guess you morons forgot about the American Revolution.
MrTrburns4 7 months ago
@MrTrburns4 ..You know why none of the freetards replied to your comment? It is too clear and concise. They prefer to use the "Bullshit Baffles Brains" style of argument. Semantics are the key to their whole FOTL mythology. Cop: "Do you UNDERSTAND the charges?" Freetard answer "No sir, I do not STAND UNDER them." Your name in all CAPS is not really you. You are not a person, you have a person.
What a bunch of short bus riding clusterfucks.
mapache11 5 months ago
Also, See interview on Missing 13th amendment: See: "WilliamWagener, Missing original 13th Amendment"
williamwagener 8 months ago
The ridiculous thing about this video is that a simple google search for "common law" or "Uniform Commercial Code" will show anybody that the information in this vid is completely bogus, but for some reason people are still buying into it. It's amazing that in an age where all information is accessible in a matter of minutes, people still suffer from self-imposed ignorance and buy into ridiculous crap like the kind being fed to them in this video.
ThisIsTheRealSkinny 8 months ago
@ThisIsTheRealSkinny yes alot of people think it is a get out of jail free card, it can only help against the bias giant corrupt machine of the courts and their lawyers. there is buying into anything being sold or there is cross referencing too. I do not speak out of my ass, and people who try to bring UCC into basic proceedings get schooled by the Judge that works for a foreign institution and not for the state/people get confused or tongue tied.
letsgoforajoyride 8 months ago
@ThisIsTheRealSkinny ...the thing about Freetards is that they are impervious to logical thought. Tough to debate someone who thinks that upper and lower case names, and even the color of the ink you sign with mean anything at all. The guys who invented this shit must be laughing and laughing at the idiots who believe it.
mapache11 5 months ago
@mapache11 You seem to know a lot...let me know why the last names are always capitalized? I often wondered that...
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ... If you are talking about documents where the given names only have the first letter in upper case, and the surname in all caps, it is to distinguish between the two. When both names are all caps, it is a pain in the ass to keep moving between upper and lower case when you are inputting hundreds, if not thousands, of names every day. In fact, my mom's birth certificate, from the 1940's, is written by hand, and it is not in all caps.
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 I guess it would be no problem if you had a note from a doctor saying you had Hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia and would only comply if your name was spelled the way it is in 99% of all that is written in accordance with the rules of written English (other than any CAPITALIZED use, as in government, credit cards etc) LOL. Perhaps the courts are acting a little rebellious to insist on going against the rules of English grammar ? LOL Is the NAME issue about personal sovereignty?
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ......if there were some giant governmental plot to use your name as collateral, then they would issue a standardized birth certificate, like they do with passports. Birth certificates are different everywhere and change their appearance too. Example. My mom and dad were born after 1930. They were born three years apart in towns right next to each other. My dad's birth certificate is on a 8.5 x11 sheet of blue paper, all typed and everything in caps..not just names.
mapache11 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..My mom's birth certificate is on a 4x6 piece of white paper, and all the information was handwritten in pen. First letters being the only letters capitalized. So according to the Freetards, my dad is chattel, and my mom isn't. ROFLMFAO.
In addition to this, there have been literally hundreds of thousands of politicians, lawyers, judges, and cops that would have to know about the "plot" and yet none of them use the info to protect themselves in court.
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 Is the "plot" you speak of more in the lines of "crown" continuing their 'control' over the 'freetards'? Many people lack understanding that they have the ability to assume control over their own personal sovereignty. Who do you think signs a death warrant ? Perhaps you are an individual who has the ability to choose whether you pay 'tax' and where the tax dollars gets spent on..."hundreds of thousands of politicians, lawyers, judges, and cops" ARE the court, which protects itself.
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ....really, then why, when politicians, lawyers, judges, cops, and people who run the stock markets are caught doing something illegal, from drunk DRIVING, to cheating on their own taxes (which they obviously wouldn't be paying if there were a plot..but I digress) have they NEVER, not once, since the plot began over 75 years ago, ever used any of the Freetard tactics to avoid punishment of any kind??? They are AWESOME secret keepers.
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 I totally agree with you that arguing the CAPITALIZATION "secret" in a court of law is silly. The issue of personal sovereignty is an entirely different matter, which you have, for some reason chosen not to address in our discussion...perhaps you have an emotional attachment to the present system of oppression. Perhaps you either enforce stupid laws (all laws except the obvious ones that deal with violence onto others) or are involved in the legal system...sock puppets are tards2!
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@mapache11 "drunk DRIVING" = higher than normal potential for inflicting violence on others = criminal behavior. "cheating on their own taxes" = most "taxes" goes to pay for oppression. If you lost your ability to pay for the rent/mortgage of your home of 40 years, and men in costumes arrived to physically remove you and you refused to be homeless, you can be put in jail for resisting, and can legally be shot to death...is that the "avoid punishment of any kind" you speak of ?
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ... I'll make this simple for you. If what Freetards believe is true, that being that a) we don't have to pay taxes and b) your name in all caps is not you, then why have no politicians, lawyers etc who have been caught breaking ANY FUCKING LAW AT ALL, ever used any of the Freetard arguments in court. EVER. and how have they managed to keep this all a secret from Michael Moore. I know you agree that the caps idea is silly, but it what they BELIEVE.
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 Yes, no one in a free society is required to have their blood & sweat (money) taken without consent. Who signs a death warrant? As far as I understand the only person who can sign a death warrant is the person being killed. What are your thoughts on 'personal sovereignty'?
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...Freetards live in a fantasy world where everyone treats each other respectfully all the time. Everyone is honest, hardworking and wants to share what they have. Despite the fact that the world isn't like that, my family and thousands of other families have gone from poverty to a relaxed upper middle class life in three generations. There are things about the system that aren't perfect, but freetards only need to look at Somalia to see what happens with no government.
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 Untards live in a fantasy world where terrorists run rampant and the only way to control the masses is by more laws, Untards are great proponents of juicy items like the patriot act. In an economy based on rewarding "the best" inevitably most people step on others to 'get ahead'. One only needs to look at Zimbabwe to see what happens with "lots" of "representatives" who enable unregulated money issuing by the likes of the Federal Reserve. Look at Somalia, send in the drones...
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@mapache11 "drunk DRIVING" = higher than normal potential for inflicting violence on others = criminal behavior. "cheating on their own taxes" = most "taxes" goes to pay for oppression. If you lost your ability to pay for the rent/mortgage of your home of 40 years, and men in costumes arrived to physically remove you and you refused to be homeless, you can be put in jail for resisting, and can legally be shot to death...is that the "avoid punishment of any kind" you speak of ?
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...wow you are one for the books. Although it is quite the strawman you have entered into the discussion I will address it. If I am renting my home, that means that I have signed a contract to pay every month to live there. In said contract it is clearly stated that if I don't pay, i can be forced to leave. If I borrowed the money to pay for a home, again I signed a contract to pay it back. If I don't, again I can be forced to leave.
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 Even in (virtually all) contractual arrangements, there is no indication that violence can/will be used in the event of default. IF there is indication of violence as a tool within contract, that is agreeing to perpetrating a criminal offense...a contract that is not in accordance with the law is not a contract under law, a best, an agreement among untards...
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...Untards live in the real world. It isn't perfect by any means, but it is REAL. Freetards think that by playing with semantics they will change human nature. Good luck with that. I can explain my feeling on personal sovereignty with an old analogy. "My right to swing my fist around ends at the tip of your nose."
A great many laws are made because of knuckleheads with no common sense. Communism rewards mediocrity. How many people are defecting TO Cuba or China?
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 So personal sovereignty to you means perpetrating violence...are you a cop? A great many laws are made to assume financial control. There is no such thing as "human nature", only human behavior, behavior is fluid and fairly consistent with outside influences. Communism? Can you say "Bail out" or "corporate welfare"? Guess how many US dollars USED TO BE owned by China? Guess how much USA rental property, land, businesses and banks have been purchased by China in the last 4 years?
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..every loan contract or rental agreement I've signed has spelled out clearly what the consequences are for failing to pay. Of course they don't mention violence, fuckwit. But if I don't pay my rent and the police are called because the landlord couldn't evict me, and Istill refuse to leave, the police are within their rights to use whatever force is necessary to evict me. If I am sitting on my sofa, they can carry me away. if I threaten them, they can shoot me.
mapache11 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..every loan contract or rental agreement I've signed has spelled out clearly what the consequences are for failing to pay. Of course they don't mention violence, fuckwit. But if I don't pay my rent and the police are called because the landlord couldn't evict me, and Istill refuse to leave, the police are within their rights to use whatever force is necessary to evict me. If I am sitting on my sofa, they can carry me away. if I threaten them, they can shoot me.
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 Your right to a home is somehow less than the right of a cop to kill you...riiight. That only works if you are employed as a cop...or a landlord...or part of the system that prefers the rights of money over humanity...
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...you are quickly achieving status as the biggest whackjob at youtube. People have the right to do anything that does infringe on anyone else's rights. Is that simple enough for you?? What SHOULD a landlord do if someone refuses to pay rent?
mapache11 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..Please do society a favor, go gather the other Freetards, pool all your resources, buy an island, and live happily ever after without any fear of taxes, rent, or cops.
Human nature, human behaviour. You are never going to change either human nature or human behaviour by playing with words.
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 Seems to me that a valid point stands on its own and is in no need for 'word play', name calling or commands from tards to "go elsewhere"...Perhaps I AM a reflection of the future of SOCIETY where violence is the #1 crime and cops become peace officers, highly trained in dispute resolution. I would love to see an island where all the nasty little (or big) fist swinging macho types can choose to live and kill each other: best-est killer takes all...
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...With regards to the fist swinging and noses, it was Oliver Wendell Holmes who first stated that. Not me. The fact that you took it literally is sadly telling. Nowhere have I promoted violence. I have stated that if a person threatens someone with violence, then the threatened person has a right to defend themself. I am sure that in the future there will be no more greed, theft, rape ,or any other crime. We will all live a world full of love and peace. Keep waiting.
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 We will all live a world full of love and peace...nice...
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...1) If a person refuses to pay rent, and the landlord cannot get the person to leave, what should the landlord do? 2) How has the "truth", that must be common knowledge among all politicians, lawyers, judges, etc etc been kept from the masses for so long and why do none of the people in those lines of work that deal in and with the "truth" ever use any of its loopholes to escape the consequences of any illegal activities they have been caught doing?
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 1) There is no need to perpetrate violence in a free society: we do not live in a free society, therefor, as you indicate, violence is the only answer. 2) I have very little knowledge of this "truth" you speak of. What do I understand is that too few people are in a position of power over the masses. This "authority" seems to function on a "do as I say, not as I do" mentality. This obedience to authority breeds financial terror, physical violence and oppression.Violence is criminal
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ... You have given a rather oblique reponse to question 1. You failed to answer question 2 at all. Well done Captain Freetard.
HELL JUST FROZE< PIGS ARE SEEN FLYING ALL OVER THE WORLD, AND ALL HOUSES, APARTMENTS, BUSINESSES AND LAND ARE FREE FOR THE TAKING.
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 1.) In the present society violence is the answer, as it is built into the illusion of fiat currency. 2.) I have no idea what your question is as I do not consider myself, as you claim a "Freetard" and as a result do not know the info in the strange talk you are talking about (colors, allocation of HOUSES, APARTMENTS, BUSINESSES AND LAND ARE FREE FOR THE TAKING for one person called a Freetard or what ever your ideas are)
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..if you believe the bullshit this video expounds, then yes you are a Freetard. The gold standrard did not prevent violence. People owned property, people rented property. People lost homes if they didn't repay loans. They were evicted for not paying rent. The fiat system did not have nay effect on human BEHAVIOUR.
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 I believe portions of what this video expounds has validity. Like you say a lot of it is BS. The fiat system is based on debt currency supply. The banks create the money into existence and demand back more than they created, mathematically, someone has to default, as there is not enough money to pay back the "interest" no matter how "hard working & honest" you are. To create the money supply & demand that more than what was created is financial terror.
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...only a moron would get shot over refusing to pay their rent. I have never heard of it happening, but since YOU brought it up, I assume that you are fuckwitted enough to sign a rental agreement, stop paying rent, refuse to leave the property, then pull a gun on the police that go to help the landlord.
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 I have no written lease, loan or rental agreement. Guns are good for hunters and cowards, I am neither.
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..Please do the sane people in society a favor and pool your money with other Freetards, get an island and go live happily ever after without fear of taxes, rent, or cops.
mapache11 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ..you can dig up Jordan Maxwel's corpse and dance naked around it every night.
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 In the case of 'common law', does it matter if the last name is all capitalized or not? Is the whole story about admiralty law re: Signed birth certificate by parent = child is then considered abandoned chattel at sea and now property of the state just BS? Is the whole story re: "to capitalize" merely a fable, and the meaning ("to capitalize" on a situation) mere coincidence ? Is it untrue that the stock market buys and sells (capitalizes on) birth certificates?
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube ...Let's see..the answers are: no, yes, yes and yes. How's that.
mapache11 4 months ago
@mapache11 Answers: no = true, yes = false, yes = false, yes = false. One out of 4 aint bad. I agree it is tardish to argue CAPITALIZATION in court. To argue sovereignty is a totally different issue, and one freetards have a valid point about. course we both are not willing to do all the research to show who is true...so WE BOTH WIN...
JonathanSeagullUtube 4 months ago
This is completely stupid.
kilgore2345 8 months ago
nevermind all the naysayers they are corrupt or i mean lawyers and dont want you to know their tricks of the trade and are scared of losing money from dumb clients.
letsgoforajoyride 8 months ago
@301gunnar that really was not original or obvious misinforming at all, no, not one bit....
letsgoforajoyride 8 months ago
@3fty665 Do you mean leave? Or do you mean become a sovereign citizen. If you mean sovereign citizen then your going to stay here do every thing the same but refuse to pay taxes, break traffic laws and several other things that they do not believe they should have to do.
Frowardkiller 8 months ago
dont worry the war is coming soon
atomic519 9 months ago
Why are these videos always listed under entertainment?
philnoll 9 months ago
ofcourse common law exists, how stupid can people be? common law exists in all countrys.Common law trumps all law. This should be taught in school however it is not because school , just like the media/ universistys / etc etc are all controlled by the corperate elite. Its a huge illusion scam perpetuated by the freemason illuminati and NWO to maintain our enslavement.
JOINTHERESISTANCE1 9 months ago
@JOINTHERESISTANCE1 A lot of common law does not apply to today's America. America changes meaning its law also needs to change to fit advancements of technology and such.
Frowardkiller 8 months ago
@Frowardkiller you keep misinforming people to get more clients "todays america" . are you fucking serious with that talk? we both know the patriot act opened a gateway for the corrupt. so "todays america" UCC is much more applicable than it ever was. so tell me what purpose do you serve trying to mislead people?
letsgoforajoyride 8 months ago
@letsgoforajoyride I misunderstood what common law was at first i thought it was referring to the constitution or something i did some reading and saw that its based on old court cases. But common law can always change and contradict its self.
Frowardkiller 8 months ago
so can a lot of things contradict themselves thats why you got to know and keep up to date and know which things fit together and which ones they rewrote because people were catching on and firms were losing clients, but they will always leave loops so they can bail out their corrupt buddies so those are available to use to just we have alot more pulling teeth today because we or at least some of us are not in the grind and pay 10k+ a year just to have a title that any monkey can easily attain.
letsgoforajoyride 8 months ago
@letsgoforajoyride By your definition is it not up to the judge then if to use common law? Judges rulings are what makes common law right? So the judges dont really have to make rulings based on common law but use it as a reference or am i wrong?
Frowardkiller 8 months ago
@Frowardkiller hmm? you are trying to confuse things again? Judges are Common Laws bitch to put it bluntly and they do not like talking about it because they lose that commission of the ticket they are overseeing so to protect their investments and all the lawyers they all sway you into bullshit and say pleading guilty is the very best thing u can do (to fuck yourself royally)
letsgoforajoyride 8 months ago
@letsgoforajoyride Then im not trying to mislead people "Judges are Common Laws". As you see you are saying the same thing i am. When its pretty clear the person has broken the law and their is a mountain of evidence against them im sure the lawyer would say its better for the person to plead guilty. Their investment is getting you free if they are your lawyer. If they purposely get you thrown into prison then they can go to jail and your case gets a new hearing.
Frowardkiller 8 months ago
@Frowardkiller well lawyers do purposely and obligataroy to the states and court /government to make it seem like you are getting a bargain when in fact the poor sap is not even guilty to begin with because many rights and laws have been broken that noone will call upon or are too afraid to call things out or if they do get stumped by the lawyer language and just give in. The UCC was created to protect criminals in business than through criminal which intertwine thank god to the patriot act.
letsgoforajoyride 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@letsgoforajoyride "well lawyers do purposely and obligataroy to the states and court /government to make it seem like you are getting a bargain when in fact the poor sap is not even guilty to begin with" Or they could be guilty and deserve what they get. Stop trying to defend the criminals that mess up their own life. Plenty of banks and or big business get charged with crimes and do jail time.
Frowardkiller 8 months ago
@letsgoforajoyride thanks for exposing yourself by using jon stewart , a wash out comedian to backup your theory and prove my point you dont know law.
letsgoforajoyride 8 months ago
@letsgoforajoyride Lol the UCC has nothing to do with day to day laws in America. Your referring to the crap pot theories that people have. None of it is proven. Jon Stewart showed how funny you people are. Its just sad of you type of people. Im glad for the patriot act. The government is finally starting to crack down on extremists its about time for these terrorists to be dealt with.
Frowardkiller 8 months ago
@JOINTHERESISTANCE1 and even more backed by the lawyers who sold their souls to lie about it.
letsgoforajoyride 8 months ago
UCC can be used in court, you have to "stand" in common law jurisdiction. I sign any government paperwork with an explicit reservation of rights and have had tickets signed this way dismissed pursuant F.R.C.P. Rule 12, the "court" has no jurisdiction. Add the other 3 conflicts of interest and its no win for the court when you know your rights/duties/allegiances. Would a competent man agree to a unilateral contract that isn't beneficial to himself? The rules are simple, no crime victim, no crime.
FFCS2009 10 months ago
why are the followers of york stressing the judiciary process?
is not the "MOTHERSHIP" that the "master teacher" predicted going to descend and pick up york and his elected?
yeah. i can't wait to see it on cnc when the "MOTHERSHIP" rips throw the thick reinforce concrete walls and save the "master teacher".
afterray 10 months ago
Videos like this make niggaz look so stupid factual right poorly presented with shaky knowledge on the subjects yes they're universal laws but common law stems from the magna carta read a book before doing a video you're making me look bad
MegaMalow 10 months ago
do de commun law be existin' shit? I beze tellin yo.
Idiocy
daves4mtb1 11 months ago
Comment removed
rclark23 11 months ago
This video is meant to confuse the issue. Common law and the U.C.C.(Uniform Commercial Code) are not one and the same. The U.C.C. was not published until 1952. Look up common law vs. Admiralty Law.
ckairnes68 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have an incredibly hairy ass so what I do on hot days is I insert my fingers into the leaky moist asscrack lengthwise then flex allowing all the bumjuice to absorb onto the skin of my fingers. After 5 minutes I then remove my bumjuice soaked fingers from my moist butthole and proceed to lick up all the bumjuice. The licking actually enhances the scent of the bumjuice so I always take a big wif.What bumjuice is left on my skin and under my fingernails I scrape off with my teeth
THE END
BumJuiceDrinker 1 year ago
The truth won't alway set you free, but it will make you free.
sisterquintella 1 year ago
@RunLiberty
Voting for presidents is like filling a broken vase with water.
EtherHunt 1 year ago
Do you know if it is permitted in Mississippi?
2kthig 1 year ago
I'm shocked at how many people believe that the laws don't apply to them.
If you are a US Citizen, are bound to uphold the laws of the US. Just look at the N-400, the form people fill out to become naturalized citizens. It clearly states that, as a citizen, one "bears true faith and allegiance" to "the Constitution and laws of the United State of America."
So you consent to be governed by being a CITIZEN. If you don't want to be governed by US law, renounce your citizenship and move away.
cain308 1 year ago
@cain308
but are all laws the same ? common law refers to law of the commoners witch still applies in many countries
part of the US laws are based on it . also it is to note that not all laws apply to everyone .
also you must not confuse citizenship with existence . citizenship is not the same as resident-ship or domicile
also to note that in some body of laws a person may not necessarily refer to you as a human being
romeoneverdies 1 year ago
@cain308 They are not Laws, just like the patriot act which violates the fourth amendment is not a law. It's maratime admiralty commerical codes. There is a big differnece between being a citizen and a resident. Guess which is the slave.
mmtot 1 year ago
@mmtot you
IAMNOTAHUMANINC 10 months ago
@IAMNOTAHUMANINC Nobody is talking to you, pal.
mmtot 10 months ago
@mmtot I don't give a damn fag.
IAMNOTAHUMANINC 10 months ago
@IAMNOTAHUMANINC Don't give a fag then, retard.
mmtot 10 months ago
@mmtot thumbs up
letsgoforajoyride 8 months ago
the key word there is "intend to be married" .. you shouldnt be considered married unless you consider yourself married
longfootbuddy 1 year ago
if you need common law explaining see John Harris just an illusion on the tpuc.org website....... statute law is naval law and does not have any lawful standing upon land
stamfordplace 1 year ago
@stamfordplace
it depense whether your talking about chatle or not actually
romeoneverdies 1 year ago
And in the corporate restructured european countries who lost the 1st and 2nd world wars???...what's with them??? F**k the USA!!!!!!!!!!
thesapiens16 1 year ago
The time is now- Wake and do it peacefully...
Talk to me Carolina G - Thinking
seekinnertruth 1 year ago
This video is clearly barking up the wrong tree. If common law is some superior unwritten evolved set of laws, then why is common law marriage recognized in 14 states and not 50? Answer because it is so defined by the statutory law of those states. Because statutory law is superior to common law.
maemorri 1 year ago
@maemorri to break this down to you deeper, Common Law is the Law of God , The Creator Of The Heavens and the Earth. This is where the founding fathers got their Constitution from. These so called state statues and constitutions are made of and now the Common Law is all but ignored. Look at this country and the mess it is in. Man marrying a man, woman marrying a woman, goes against the Common law of Leviticus. There are sooo many more to list I can't even begin. This place is the Babylon
branman055 1 year ago
@branman055 Do you eat shell fish?
Kevashida 1 year ago
@maemorri There you go, you've received your answer. They've elevated common law to "the Law of God" instead of just being a fancy term for "the precedents established by English courts over centuries that aren't all written down in one place but we kinda agree to respect." We established our statutory law based, to some degree, off of common law precedents. But that statutory law has the final say, which they don't seem to understand...
cain308 1 year ago
@maemorri wrong common law trumps statutory law. Dont make me go into detail, do your research mate!
JOINTHERESISTANCE1 9 months ago
@JOINTHERESISTANCE1 dont argue with the lawyers man haha. they put alot on the line and took an oath to serve you and I bullshit instead of knowledge. Common Law making an appearance would be a serious blow to their firms and to the govt and that whole line of corrupt pricks. Even when we are right they will say we are wrong no matter how much proof and fact and living proof that UCC and Common Law applies is that it is still recognized and used, but not by prick lawyers like your talking to.
letsgoforajoyride 8 months ago
acts and statutes are not law ... they can only be applied by force of law when given the consent of the governed < thats us ... we have to consent to be governed by it and common law over rides all! including UCC on land
UCC is Uniform Commercial Code and that is basically the law of the sea or real property to deal with trading
DjAlanBarratt 1 year ago
Let Doc go.
branman055 1 year ago
Why take a position? The commonlaw/freeman guys are taking a postion that they are free or sovereign . Why take a positon? If someone else is taking a postion that you are not free the best and only stategy is to ask them simple questions like.... when,where, why, and how did you get control/jurisdiction over me? The fact is nobody is free/sovereign. They have the guns, police, armies, and uniforms. The commonlaw/freeman/ucc guys are fundamentally wrong in their assertions.
mustaffa1611 1 year ago
common law is not unwritten law. Common law is the body of decisional authority that has accumulated over the years and centuries dating back to old england. That is what is referred to as precedent. Murder is not a commercial charge. The UCC is not common law. All of your legal theories are so far off base that it would take pages to describe all of the errors. That is why you need an attorney. Sorry, welcome to reality.
TheDaveseal 1 year ago
common law is not unwritten law. Common law is the body of decisional authority that has accumulated over the years and centuries dating back to old england. That is what is referred to as precedent.
TheDaveseal 1 year ago
@301gunnar Weak ad hominen, but I guess that's the best you can do. Hey when the next Transformers movie is up for discussion, maybe you can chime in then, k Spanky?
GoodLifeGodLike 1 year ago
Common law does still exist hence the 800th anniversary of the magna carta was celebrated has just started for 5 years ( magna carta 1215)
This is the building blocks of the legal system and cannot be over ruled BY ANYONE
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11735060
lovinit19791 1 year ago
@301gunnar Sorry you couldn't keep up. Now go back to watching Survivor and MTV.
GoodLifeGodLike 1 year ago
@ ngonea - Right, keep telling the truth...these entities need our resources (human, monetary or otherwise) to survive...without criminal activity and over taxation, they would fall and become the ghost towns of the "Old West"...
BrownEagle7 1 year ago 7
@BrownEagle7 Its a good thing for them because criminals will always exist. Its a sad truth but the truth none the less.
Frowardkiller 8 months ago
Just ask skinny to put into context Title 28 Section 3002-Definition's of the US code at the very bottom-put that into perspective now with regards to your law.....Or go to dnb dot com and over at the search on the right of the page,type in "Congressman" or "Police" and look at all the investments you can make...mine says CONGRESSMAN(also traded as JIM TALENT) Or go to the SEC dot gov and do a corporation search..type in CANADA-yep traded,JAPAN-yep traded...you get the point.....try it out
THAWK3 1 year ago
@THAWK3 I'm sorry, I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Is there a specific definition from Title 28 you want me to look at? And what is it exactly that you want me to deduce from that definition?
ThisIsTheRealSkinny 1 year ago
@ PopHead - I know enough about the law to say, don't break it because if you do you will not have any common rights nor lefts...
BrownEagle7 1 year ago
@BrownEagle7 - that is right, it's all miitary tribunal and administravtive where your quilty until you prove othewise and if you do they can still hold you in contempt, it's all about collecting revenue for the U.S. Corporate BANKRUPTCY.bonds-insurance-trusts:
see Jean keating Prison Treatise, or How a Prisoner Funds America
ngonea 1 year ago
Yes. This is entertainment... and not education.
CymHastings 1 year ago
I have heard this UCC thing and the STRAWMAN thing for years. I do legal research and have never found a instance where the courts abide or recognize it.
Now if it is the law and some evidence existe to support this, then like always the corrupt legal system is doing what it always does, whatever the hell it wants to!
I have seen many instances where lawyers don't even know the law, like for instance most civil judgments are void, due to the courts own interpretation of the law.
unclefixer 1 year ago
It mentioned Macon,GA. , I used to live in that corrupt ass backward place. I got the hell out of that city as well as the state of GA in 2009. I wasted 33 yrs of my life in that hellhole Bibb County. Some of the city council members have been on the city council for 30+ yrs and they fight like hell to keep outsiders from coming in, theres been many manufacturing companies turned away from building plants there costing the people jobs, they want to keep Macon small where Boss Hogs can rule
undergroundbasement 1 year ago
@greywolf4214 - The constitution describes basic common laws of freedom and sovereignty...baaahhh
BrownEagle7 1 year ago
@BrownEagle7 - You don't have a frickin' clue as to what common law is. Has nothing to do with constitutional law. Take a law class, you might learn something!
Popejoy 1 year ago
wow, thx... this makes so much sense :D
Thetrollmaster2000 1 year ago
@deathmarch5 - the other branches were created to oversee or better yet "guard" common law (Constitution) - The word constitution is what wakes you up every morning, (your constitution); now those branches have enslaved you by creating uncommon law and more laws than you care to think about...
BrownEagle7 1 year ago
@BrownEagle7 COMMON LAW HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CONSTITUTION.... AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "UNCOMMON LAW" THANKS FOR PROVING YOU ARE A CLUELESS LITTLE SHEEP...
greywolf424 1 year ago
@BrownEagle7 I think perhaps you're confused about what common law is. There are only two types of law: Common Law and Statute. Statutes are created by the legislative branch. Common Law is created by the judicial branch. This video is kind of ridiculous to anyone who understands the legal system because judges wouldn't ignore common law. They create it. If anything, they would ignore statutes. Whoever made this video knew absolutely nothing about common law or how it works.
ThisIsTheRealSkinny 1 year ago
Comment removed
BrownEagle7 1 year ago
if you have common sense then you understand common law ,its as simple as that ,its knowing right from wrong ,some people quote the bible for there common laws ..although ,i think the bible ,has a lot to learn about a lot of things before it starts preaching its common laws
kevrs2 1 year ago
The thing that's ridiculous about this video is judge's don't hate common law. They love it. Here's an important fact this video fails to mention. Statutes are created by legislators, Common Law is created by JUDGES. Which one do you think Judges prefer? If we got rid of statutes and the legislative branch, judges would LOVE it, because that would mean there's no one else in charge of the law but the judicial branch. They'd be free to run the legal system with nothing but common law.
thegreatfish 1 year ago
2:02 What's the deal with the comment of "Why does this judge have on NO robe"? What do you mean, "....Have on No Robe" ???
dynamicdavid 1 year ago
Ron Paul 2012 for President
RunLiberty 1 year ago 17
@RunLiberty fuck ron paul and fuck liberty.
I accept freedom now only
the rest of you are just cowards and traitors like ron paul
attorneyskillforjew 1 year ago
Common Law exists but just like the original constitution, it is ignored. You have to fight and stand to win your rights in a system that devises schemes daily to usurp your authority as a sovereign. Lawyers are not needed if this process is respected and given its proper due process, so most attorneys will automatically quote a law or book the does not supersede common law in order to confuse the process. Many have success with common law but martial law is now our problem.
BrownEagle7 1 year ago
@BrownEagle7 That can be remedied with a writ of Quo Warantto and mandamus. By what authority? authority broken down in the law books called words and phrases says authority was a combination of 2 words author and writ. The author of the writ is the plaintiff and the sovereign in the suit his jurisdiction is the court that is how they have standing. Martial law is done by executive order which only historically has been used to order the government US citizens which are subjects to it.
deathmarch5 1 year ago
@BrownEagle7 Never admit you are one unless you want to wave your sovereignty.As far as I am concerned I am an American National. That is my nationality that is my domicile I am not a resident of any state republic I am domiciled here a zip code authorized an admittance that you are a resident of the code thus a resident once your job is done you will return to your jurisdiction in other words you are an alien in your own land. check out 1215(dot)org great site of common law procedures
deathmarch5 1 year ago
@BrownEagle7 You couldn't be more of a hypocrite right now. You claim to respect the original constitution, but you want to ignore the balancing of powers the constitution created and eliminate the legislative branch, and leave the judicial branch (all the judges) in charge of our legal system. There's a reason we have three branches of government. You can't claim to respect the constitution, but then say we should eliminate the legislative branch and let common law reign.
thegreatfish 1 year ago
@BrownEagle7 - How many beers had you had when you wrote this? Common law is applied in the courts every day.
Popejoy 1 year ago
@Popejoy when you step through the swinging door in a court room, You are under Admiral Law jurisdiction and UCC, do not step through until you say to the judge, I claim common law jurisdiction, because then UCC and common law has to work in Harmony.Judge may ignore what you said,then start stateing the charges against you,JUST SAY: I do not consent and waive the benefits." need the meaning of that then contact me here on YouTube
NLOLIN4Solar 1 year ago
@NLOLIN4Solar You clearly have major misunderstandings about common law. It's not something you claim. If there's no statute on point, a court is already obligated to follow common law. Before you speak further on this topic, it would be a good idea if you went on google or wikipedia and looked up the most basic definitions you can find of UCC and common law. Work from there and educate yourself.
ThisIsTheRealSkinny 1 year ago
@ThisIsTheRealSkinny -you are incorrect since 1860 and the Reconstruction Act, we have been under Martial Law, read the Elevent Amendment, the Judical branch was abolished, you now have Admin. /Military Tribunals, posing as Judges, they do not have jurisdiction to hear, Equity, in law or controversy cases. There is no common law since the US Inc was quit claimed to the UN in 1944, there is UCC or Admiralty Maritime Law
ngonea 1 year ago
@ThisIsTheRealSkinny Not sure what made you an expert,But I am sure I have already looked it up on google, and yes if you do not claim common law jurisdiction then when you step thru- them swinging doors you are in the courts jurisdiction if you enter any plea you have contracted with the court, the charges allegedly against you are an offer to you.so say I do not consent and waive the benefits, think you need to go to Google or buy the video's from Winston Shrout because I got them all.
NLOLIN4Solar 1 year ago
@NLOLIN4Solar "if you do not claim common law jurisdiction then when you step thru- them swinging doors you are in the courts jurisdiction"
See, right there. That's what I'm talking about. Common law jurisdiction IS the courts jurisdiction. That's where common law comes from. The courts. I would love to see your source that says otherwise.
ThisIsTheRealSkinny 1 year ago