Added: 5 years ago
From: superniko
Views: 12,363
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (546)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • PETA is a flawed group of idiots, whom most know nothing about animals, but do know a lot about hate.

  • PETA, animals eat eachother all the time. Humans are animals. Your "logic" is invalid.

  • Sometimes violence is the only answer to injustice...

  • @BarryRam31 So when you unjustly try to burn my house or lab, I will justly meet you with a 12 gauge.

  • rofl, ppl in video destroying stuff is bored and wanna kick some asses

    PETA FOREVER ♥

  • For superniko: PETA is the largest animal rights organization in the world. The reason why they are being slandered is because the medical- oil- fur- cosmetics- and weapon industries see a threat to their mega billion dollar businesses caused by the animal rights movement. The corporate mafia pays market psychologists like Frank Luntz and Richard Berman horrendous sums to slander PETA in ads, TV and movies, even woven into movies sometimes, very hidden, they use peer pressure.

  • @NicolaRedwooddforest just because their big doesnt make them any better.

    They threaten, attack, and steal from innocent people.

    They stop progress with most medicines even though the CO LEADER of peta uses animal based medicines.

    Have you seen their animal kill/death ratio?

    I couldn't kill that many animals if i had a damn tank!

    (not that i would, mind you)

    Saving animals by killing them, what the fuck makes them so good?

    At least at a slaughter house the animals didn't die in vain!

  • @ShindaDesu They're*

  • @ShindaDesu Please inform yourself about Frank Luntz and Richard Berman. Don't just repeat the slander and lies about PETA. Whenever someone is slandered by the corporate media it is close to 100 percent guaranteed that this slandered person or organization is standing up for justice. PETA only euthanizes very sick animals. They send healthy animals to sanctuaries where they have it good. Progress is not corporate destruction. Slaughter is an act of worst violence.

  • @NicolaRedwooddforest so 98% of the animals they rescue are beyond help? >.>

  • @ShindaDesu I have no idea what the percentage is of very sick animals they rescue. In many cases most animals were extremely abused and sick. They are flooded with calls from people about extremely abusive situations. PETA usually focuses on situations like animals in industrial settings like the dairy industry where the cows are trampled because of severe confinement during transportation. I have seen the films about the cattle. The US military does cruel tests.

  • They admit to wanting to blow facilities which they claim abuse animals without a thought to the possibility of human death. That isn't very ethical or humane to my point of view.

  • FUCK PETA!

  • PREACH! :)

  • I could honestly see the opening scene from 28 days later actually happening because of these dumb-asses.

  • Go peta!!!!!!!

  • @HarrisonMarshall Quit PETA! If you're not going to do it because I requested, do it because the animals will be better off with one less member supporting their daily genocide.

  • @HarrisonMarshall Just to piss you off I'm gonna be eating ribs soon, so what are you gonna do? Protest? Go ahead. I won't stop eating meat.

  • @VeganMotorcyclePilot Go to hell.

  • @nerfmaster329 thank you but Im not a bible beater so dont necessarily believe in heaven and hell although I hope animal killers get paid back many fold.

  • @VeganMotorcyclePilot What makes killing animals wrong?

  • Nice work!

  • your saying killing animals to be nice is caring look up the facts!

  • @eduardoalvarez1000 Were you dropped as a child?

  • @eduardoalvarez1000 they are abunch of brainless idiots who think they can ge away with anything. they take about 50 animals from a shelter, give away about 4 euthanize the rest... I believe that's not exactly "care of animals"

  • @eduardoalvarez1000 Lets see what you say if your shroom high ever wears off.

  • @eduardoalvarez1000 Than why do they kill over 1000 animals each year?

  • To you peta bastards euthanizing an animal for no other reason but 'there is too many of them for us to take care of'. You make millions of dollars off ppl that think you keep them alive, only for us to find out that you kill them. Why NOT allow them to be free and ppl to hunt them THE WAY NATURE INTENDED!! You peta freaks are fighting a stupid fact of life to profit!!!

  • Good video. as for the question, ethical? NO. Hypocrites? Yes.

  • fuck peta they say theyre against speciesism but they support bsl and suggest euthanization for pitbulls in other shelters

    that is the biggest crock of bullshit i have ever heard

    pits rule

    peta sucks

  • does stomping my cat to death make me a bad person?

  • I would kill a PETA member if i had a shot at it.

  • agreed. lets make out own organization! kill the peta faggits.

  • People are just one species! Quit thinking about yourselves!! There are billions of animals out there suffering because of us, and PETA sometimes isnt ethical (to people at least) but they get the god job done and thats all that counts.

  • yeah they get the job alright? shut up you dont know what your talking about freak! Peta actually killed 2/3 of all the animals they rescued! WTF this is a fact and there is court records that have proved this! so shut the fuck up!

  • Well what are they suposed to do with them, THEY dont have room for all the animals, most of the animals are probably in pain and most people wont take them in because its just puppies here and puppies there, they dont want dogs that are traumatised or in pain lving with them. And before you open your fat mouth, WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING TO HELP?? Absolutely nothing thats what.

  • They shouldn't be taking in animals they don't have room for. And not all those animals are sick or in pain. Many of them are healthy. Peta has put down over 21,000 animals. Last year, they killed almost 95 percent of animals they took in. They do more harm than good.

  • And PETA members trowing hundreds of dead animal bodies into dumpsers rilly show they care. Peta are a bunch of hypocrites.

  • so i guess that going around to local vets and offering to take in abandoned animals that could be taken care of there just so they can put them in a shelter for a few days and then euthanize them is okay?

  • Umm wtf?

    They dont do that, its amazing what people are actualy making up now..

    They euthanize them because they have to, their headquarters are at a very rural location in Virginia, you cant expect many people to look for pets all the way over there..

  • Read properly,

    Anyways if you really feel that strongly about it go out and do something instead of just comenting on youtube :S

  • Well no, but your not doing the world any good by leaving stupid coments.

    Why dont you go and hate on something worth hating? I mean its an animal rights group for gods sake..

  • There are worse things in the world than an animals rights group euthanizing a bunch of miserable animals, some in too much pain to know where they are, some who are too traumatised to have a decent life..

    They would actualy be hipocrites if they DIDNT euthanise them, like I said most people dont go to animal shelters, they just go to pet shops or breeders, the animals in shelters dont live a good life it would be hipocritical of Peta to keep them alive imo.

  • animals in pain yes animals perfectly healthy hell no and the vast majority of the animals they put down r not in pain

    and traumatized?

    lol dogs get over trauma a lot faster than people buddy

    like i said im not against euthanizing animals just against euthanizing healthy animals especially when they simply euthanize them for what breed they r

    and its hypocritical of them to spend all the money they do comparing the beef industry to the holocaust when i havent seen one ad for their shelters

  • You would know all this right? lol

    Anyways I can see this is going nowhere cause your steering away from the subject so, if YOU dont care its fine cause there are thousands of others who do.

  • all u have said is that im not right so im assuming ur in denial

    u have made no point and have no argument

  • well if its ok for them to euthanize animals y do so many peta members spend so much time protesting animal shelters for doing the same thing?

  • Peta SUPORTS animal shelters..

  • then y do they protest them when the shelters euthanize the animals they have?

  • ive seen footage of peta members protesting an animal sheltethey were wearing skulll masks screaming "how animals u gonna kill today?"...

  • Ohh from the bulshit show? Those were from a separate group, they arent part of Peta, im not sure why they apeared on the show :S

  • prob like everyone else who gets on their. they thought they were gonnna prove their point over penn and teller and their own show

  • ok they euthanize pets that dont get homes ... and at the same time they break in a fur farm and let go hundreds of mink who dont know how to survive and destroy the natural balance of wild animals ? Hypocrites ?

  • @stefihuntalova no no no my friend they kill all of the animals.....

  • @noxnox11 no they give away...about 2 or 3...doesn't help any but...yeah...and then they leave the corpses at places that sell meat.

  • @DurLock345 are really 2 or 3 animals that big a number.... but that is not reallythe point...

  • @noxnox11 yeh I know.

    they are just idiots .-.

  • PETA takes animals FROM animal shelters & EUTHANIZES THEM!

  • this is 100% true

  • I'm guessing they hate the competition, and love being hypocrites.

  • Well put!

  • @dakotadenverdexter PETA members do not protest animal shelters for euthanizing animals.

  • @JTsmiley14 No,it's okay if an animal shelter whose new manager proclaimed that he was running a no kill shelter does it. Why is that so?Are they accepting the previous management's reasons for euthanization or are they being hypocrites?

  • @dakotadenverdexter not only animal shelters that do the same thing, but those animal shelters outperform peta a great deal by finding homes for more animals and killing much less.

  • being vegan in the western world is the result of being a spoilt brat..it would not be possible if it wasnt for planes flying your soya and god knows what around the world. i wish famine upon you all

  • If we get rid of the slaughter houses, how is Mcdonalds going to get their meat. I have to get a couple of happy meals a week \for my kids because i'm too tired to cook.

  • I think all these tight ass peta people should get jobs and quit living off someone else. If a vegan diet is so good for you why do doctors recommend vegans suppliment protien for the lack

  • PETA ROCKS

  • Replace the "RO" in ROCKS with "SU," and I'll agree with you.

  • peta no no respect for people. people are more import then animal!!!

  • animals are more important than people.

  • people are animals and this video does my comment service?

  • Answer me one question, ihatefeminists.

    Do you ever get tired of being wrong?

  • Heartless? ROTFL. I'm sure I do a lot more than the average person. I've donated roughly $500 to animal charities since Christmas. I'm vegetarian. I recycle and I've cared for 3 injured and orphaned birds in the last month. Im doing more than my share in our world.

  • I'm sorry, PETA.

    But I'll die if I even attempt a vegan diet. So I shall continue eating meat. :)

  • Bunch of fucking pussies... how the fuck do you think your ancestors lived??? God said man is superior to animals. He put them on this hurt for us to eat................ PETA PUSSIES

  • Don't use "god" to mount an argument. You'll only look like an idiot.

  • rawr almost over 9000 views niko :D

  • why dont you murder him or something so that he doesnt kill more animals ? :) didnt think so u fag just go kill yourself if its so hard for you to see animals getting killed.. remember that we are on top of the food chain here dumbass

  • PETA

    People Eating Terrified Animals

  • would you suppoert them if u knew they kill 83% of the animals they take in and the creator of peta uses medicine which was discovered by animal testing?

  • Finaly the truth comes out about peta thank god

  • Um wow! Stupid Peta! Ugh!!!!!

  • You all kill animals. One is doing it painfree. The other is not.

  • "You're telling me that human beings are equal to animals?"

    There it is. superiority over animals = pure narcissism. Not much else to say.

    Ah, note: this is center for consumer freedom propaganda. The guys that ran public campaigns against scientific research showing the health effects of tobacco. They knew the whole time that it was killing people, and their work led to more deaths. In the millions. Talk about ethics.

  • Why do you prefer the human shape to the dog shape?? Regan was clear that the dog was both smarter than the retarded baby, and further in development, not to mention it could probably offer more to society if it went on to become a police officer or service dog. Please justify your absurd prejudice with logic.

  • You're telling me that human beings are equal to animals? I am sorry dude thats screwed logic. And you are right. I used to set traps for rats. You know why? Cuz the little bastards are nasty disease carrying parasites that would do nothing for society. btw I love dogs and do not support animal cruelty. I just wish people focused on helping they're own kind more than saving rats who if anything harm society.

  • I am not saying human beings are equal. I'm saying to the extent that they are, they deserve equal consideration. As an example, dogs, rabbits and small primates probably have equal capacity for pain, and many other human emotions such as depression or terror. In this regard, they deserve equal consideration because this aspect of them is as a matter of fact equal with ours, as far as we can fairly assume to say the very least.

  • hell yeah.. i would take a human life(one who is cruel to animals) to rescue animals.. i say that with pride..

  • Peta is not "Ethical." When it come to animals, ethical mean not cause extreme torture on animals when their sloughterd for food.

  • peta is just a cult

    i bet charles manson is so proud of them

  • peta is one of the worst organizations in america. why are there so many people focusing on animals when there are so many humans in need. i guess PETA likes animals more than people.

  • i like animals more then people and support peta

  • So in other words, you support terrorism, anti-Semitism, and hypocrisy.

  • Let me guess, you volunteer at several charities. Guess what, hypocrite, torturing and killing humans isn't legal, whereas maiming and killing animals in torturous ways is in many cases paid by our taxes, you self-absorbed consumerist fuckwads. Who's going to punish you for starving to death a rat who chewed its limbs off and ripped its tongue trying to get off your sadistic glue trap?? So because I am fair to all species, I must somehow prefer them. Predictable call, you dumb parasites.

  • This as is by a company called the CCF which are owned by The Philip Morris Company. This company was caught doing extensive testing on beagles? They forced pregnant beagles to inhale constant, daily repetitive doses of cig smoke in order to try and find a safe way to keep pregnant women smoking.

    And the millions of human deaths and billions in medical care /yr because of smoking addictions they introduced.

    look up:

    Center for Consumer Freedom Exposed

  • And PETA is one to complain. They have been caught killing animals!

  • And comparing the Holocaust to deaths of Chickens must make them feel smart, dumbasses. I'm going to cook me some chicken nuggets right now.

  • Still can't believe that shit, these people need to be put in a mental hospital because they are not mentaly stable

  • @cakeforrachie fuck you, you're just a blind bastard who can't understand the feelings of humans AND animals.

  • @HarrisonMarshall COOL STORY, BRO.

  • God, talk about fucking rude.

  • I am a vegetarian. I don't wear any fur or even wool. I don't buy make up or anything that has been tested on animals. I am against PETA. They are a VERY over the top, but they do have SOME good points. This ad is probably made by somebody who kills animals, but it does bring up a extremely good point.

  • PETA Kills animals.

  • Wonder if there will ever be a group that tries to force vegans to eat meat...that would make some interesting confrontations.

  • Jesus would tell you judge not less you be judged yourself.

  • Maybe that is because you do not have a point.

  • I wish she'd play a game of Russian Roulette with Ted Nugent, with just two simple rules.

    1-All 6 chambers of the revolver are loaded.

    2-Ingrid goes first.

  • you'll all change your tune 'if' the bomb drops and we have to cope with a nucleor winter and no technology. underneath your postering and moralising your just animals in a foood chain.

  • good for peta. im all for it. somebody has to get their hands dirty to protect these innocent animals i wish i was there2

  • Crisology needs a life.. What a chump. Still out recruiting mush brain little girls and girlie little boys for foot soldiers? Go to Home Depot and buy some manly tools you tool.

  • PeTA are tax exempt terrorists that now wants to do away with no kill shelters. In 2006 PeTA killed 97% of the animals given to their custody by people who thought PeTA would give them homes. Instead PeTA gave them a needle as soon as they were in the company van! PeTA and her domestic terrorist organization should be in prison. Not tax exempt and rich!

  • peta forever...

  • Sounds like a good prison sentence for them.

  • PETA is the Vegan Taliban. Ingrid Newkirk = Osama bin Laden.

  • It's a known fact that PETA is a terrorist organization working within the borders of America. Their followers should be rounded up and legally executed. Same goes for ALL terrorists. You don't deal with terrorists. You round them up, and you get rid of them.

  • ''Their followers should be rounded up and legally executed.''

    They should be rounded up and executed anyway,legally or not,since they have been quoted as stating hat they will soon rely on the use of the GUN to enforce their worldview.

    I WILL give these fascist motherfuckers a fight,that I can promise you.I'll make them sorry they ever started this ridiculous ''crusade'' of thiers.

  • Meat diets are leading to a devolutionary dead end for H. sapiens (more appropriately known as H. corpus since sapien diet is not wise) because of overpopulation, diminishing habitat/resources, inefficient diets that exploit mammals, a gradual shift in wiser, efficient diet is occurring. To toss out a genetic script of 50 million yrs in favor of fallback food that has no future in regard to health or environment is genetic drifting in a stagnant Paleolithic pool, regardless of custom.

  • You know, I see all these "animal" and "environmental" activists spending thousands, if not millions. Sure, most of them have good intentions, but what makes me sad is all the poor and starving people in not only Africa, but Asia, the Pacific, Europe, South America, and even here in my own backyard in North America, are without food or shelter.

    "Save the Future" Great.

    I'm not taking sides, but what about the present?

  • Wow, so what are u doing for all these "poor and starving people in Africa, Asia, Europe, etc?"

    NOTHING!

    If u are vegetarian, at least u are living sustainably and efficiently, eliminating biggest obstacle of feeding the world (resources).

    The either or fallacy is a common scapegoat for Homo corpus consumere as exemplified by this poster. To help humans, help nature.

  • Good for you rich, privileged boy. Next time time there's a civil war in your area, I hope you freaking take care of those rats who are eating the corpses dead from grenades and bullets.

    You freaking vegans are nothing but useless scum.

  • Why am I "privileged" I chose a diet that is compatible with my anatomy as a human and I have personally saved some humans lives. u are getting off topic, what grenades are u talking about u paranoid meatarian?

  • You moron. People like you have never personally seen human suffering or too cold hearted to care about it.

    How is eating vegetables saving human lives? You think the homeless in your city cares if you ate plants instead of meat? You know what they'll say? They'll say you're a freaking selfish rich moron. You guys have no respect for human lives. You guys compare meat eating with slavery and the holocaust. Freaking pricks.

  • I've saved several lives in different ways. For some reason you attacked me about grenades and civil wars so that's where that came from. I never said I saved lives with food but actually that might be true too since I have an efficient diet with low impact on ecology without diminishing resources. I care far more than you about humans and animals, there is not an inverse relationship as you seem to wish.

  • You don't seem to understand what I said because as I keep saying, you're a freaking moron. You have no idea what wars and suffering is all about. THAT IS WHY YOU DO NOT THINK THIS IS RELEVANT. You're a rich scum bag who cares nothing about people on Earth. You just care about YOUR own future.

    Besides, here's a cliche moron, why not kill all the meat eating animals? Oh wait, BECAUSE it's part of the life cycle. Go to school and then come back, and not some retarded "art" school.

  • I understand how bad u want to switch the subject since u were beat up by some rich kid for your lunch money but it is the fallacy of bifurcation that u commit when u claim that just because ppl care for animals that they don't care for ppl. The opposite is true.

    Why do u want to kill real meat eating animals? That has nothing to do with aberrant diet of ppl.

    If u really cared about ppl as much as u act, u would be concerned about biggest causes of death being not from war but eating meat.

  • You have hit the key word, "chose". That choice is for each individual to make, hence the term freedom of choice.  It is not up to one person to make that choice for everybody else. In simple English keep your nose out of my business. You don't eat meat. Great, hallejuah, and yippy yippy coway for you. I do eat meat but I will not ever try to force you to change your beliefs. Please give me the same respect and courtesy that I extend you.

  • 88wildfat- choice is for each individual to make, hence the term freedom of choice. It is not up to one person to make that choice for everybody"

    Thanx for moralizing.. If u quote then u attempt to show u refute something, otherwise, why are u off on a rocket about a word "chose" out of context? You're debating yourself & not even losing yet without full quotes. Nobody prevents u from killing yourself/family. I pay taxes for your meat. Give 1/2 the respect I give u. u are NO victim.

  • Please give the same respect for the animals that abused and killed for only to be used as accessories.

  • What does a civil war have to do with killing animals for no reason?

  • I kill animals for a VERY good reason:

    To supply my body with the nutrients and fuel to live.

    They do the same thing too,you idiot.

    I will also kill for sport,for defense,and to clean out pests.

    Get over yourself,you sanctimonious fake.

  • Name calling with an aberrant diet that contributes to virtually every degenerative disease = lost debate.

  • crisology...

    I like animals

    but you're retarded

  • u like cancer and heart disease. Keep moving...

  • Doesn't surprise me in the slightest.

    The PETA elitists have stated that one of their goals is the lowering of the human population to an almost medieval state,with few population centers, even less people,and animals running rampant everywhere.

    The world that they envision is the Dark Ages all over again,only with worse diseases,and them in control.

    Ingrid Newkirk is insane.

  • I think what you're trying to describe (unsuccessfully) would be a world in which sustainable populations coexist without imbalance and exploitation, in which there are sustainable resources and people could eat to promote health instead of just to survive. Parents would breed in #s that they could support and ppl are responsible.

  • FUCK PETA...EAT MORE CHICKENS

  • fuck you!

    maybe you dont know but every sinlge piece of chicken has a piece of poop in it!

  • i said FUCK PETA...and that means you too..dumbass

  • American Cancer Society-

    "You can increase your cancer risk by eating too much grilled red meat or chicken or even meat pan-fried"

    "Eating Bacon & Skinless Chicken May Cause Bladder Cancer

    By Dr. Ben Kim on December 02, 2006"

    etc.

  • we don't want any, leave youtube and join some porn site, I truly don't care, and no-one else does, so leave us alone bitch!

  • Deforestation in tropical rainforests are 50% attributable to meat eating diet.

  • everyone listen up! im startng a new belief system, from now on, noone can eat any thing alive, vegetables included, join now!! save the cauliflower!!

  • "If americans would cut their meat consumption by 10% it would be enough to feed the planet on the grains used to feed livestock instead."

    "Denmark went vegetarian for a year during world war 1 (1918) and experienced lower death rates/

    established world record for lower death rate. Pre-war death rates resumed the following year when Denmark resumed an omnivorous diet.

  • yea right! that was back then this is now! now they have everything veggetarian you can imagieb even veggetarian dog food! my dog eats it just finne! has he died? GET A GAWD DAMN TIME CHECK!

  • Relax, my comment was saying lower death rates not higher. I'm on your side. Slow down.

  • What are we supposed to eat, rocks?

  • (sarcasm) its stupid to stop eating anything that has been part of mans diet since inception. im just pointing out that cauliflower is every bit as alive as you and i are. it hypocritical to not eat "anything with a face" and have no problem destroying the life of anything else

  • Then how much more "stupid" is it to eat meat after 50 million yr evolving digestive system on fruit?

  • first of all not fruit, browse, leaves mostly, some stuff that we biologically cant eat right now, what it comes down to is ethics, not sensibility, peta has no qualms with high-fructose-corn-syrup which is much worse for you than than grilled fish or the like, if you want to argue heaalthy diet, then fine, have a problem with the syrup.

    if you want to argue ethics then fine, have a problem with people killing cauliflower.

  • I understand u don't want to talk about health in regard to eating. But the fact is syrup kills less ppl than meat. Wars kill less ppl than meat. Therefore, the health and ethical issues are both reasons to avoid meat. Yet there are many others. Take your pick and I'll expose your fallacious, conditioned thinking that eating meat is justified outside aberrant customs.

  • are you saying that grilled salmon is worse for you than high-fructose corn syrup? how about crystal meth?

    if your really on a health crusade, why have a problem with meat and not the thousands of other things that people do which are bad for them?

  • I didn't say anything about salmon. Why would u assume I'm advocating corn syrup? In fact corn syrup is made from GMO corn & the meat/dairy industry are the largest consumers of GMO corn of course & that's all subsidized in a giant, corrupt package so that fits nicely into your role as a consumer of meat.

    Just because I point out downfalls of fallback food (meat). Doesn't mean ignore all the other problems more or less. Why are you switching the subject is a better question?

  • so, do you think its alright to eat salmon? and for your information, the agricultural industry has nothing to do with the meat industry, click view all comments to see the comment you actually replied to. my point is that you peta activists pretend your concerned about human-kind, and really its all about animal rights. you dont care if i eat cauliflower, but you do if i eat a fish, this is hypocritical, as cauliflower is every bit as alive as the fish.

  • The large agribusinesses supply GMO corn and grains for meat industry (their largest consumers). Cheap grains are needed for a cheap meat industry that is not profitable without government subsidies, nor does it make sense in regard to health. If you take care of animals by not eating them= you live longer so there is no discrepancy between caring for animals and ppl.

  • What if the grand wizard of the KKK bought the same type of toothbrush i used, would that make me evil? what about tobacco? do you deny it is worse than grilled fish? there is a major discrepencie between caring for animals and caring for people, depending on how relative you want to go.

    so far your argument has been two part, you say its unethical to eat animals and its unhealthy to eat animals.

  • the problems with both of your arguments is they are both hypocritical

    for ethics killing vegetables is no better than killing a fish

    for helath, there are hundreds of types of meats and dairy which are better for you than some of the plants which make up a large part of peoples diets.

  • Name 1.

  • I just named two

    You claim you have a two part agenda, ethics and health.

    The problem is you only attack a very small amount of injustice in both.

    There are many plants that you eat which were at one time every bit as alive as the animals you advocate.

    Also there are many things worse a person could eat other than meat.

    So, although you have the right to enforce these limitations upon yourself your position cannot be supported by logic.

  • Given: Animals feel pain. Given: Causing pain is immoral. Therefore: Killing animals that feel pain is immoral. In conjunction with: Given: Failure to stop immoral behavior is immoral. Therefore: Allowing animals that feel pain to BE killed is immoral.
  • My God,you freaks DO stay up nights thinking this crap up don't you?

    Circular logic if I have ever seen it!

    Sure,they are going to feel pain.Every creature with nerves does.

    That does not make them the equals of humans in any sense,let alone giving them any rights.

    why not just make idols out of hem and say what you really mean:that we should be worshipping them or some other drivel.

  • Circular? Just disprove one premise or go right to the conclusion to try to dismantle. The ball is in your court but you asked and now you're just whining about other ppl spending time stultifying your paleolithic daydream and rambling about equality and rights. You are running fast from a logical debate that you tried to instigate.

  • running from a debate?, you havent replied to me in a week because i pointed out your hypocrisy. you still havent even tried to refute the claims of hypocrisy ive made toward you, i suppose this is because your only capable of spewing out peta slogans and other mindless arguments that you dont know how to defend.

  • What a rant. Nothing you have ever posted cris, is in any way "logical".