Making a Messiah, Pt. 3 (Messiah who missed the mark)

[4everDOZ]

ok TaylorX04 what is the meaning of @5:33 "what's a nigga gon do?" i already know the new testament is a bunch of garbage invented by the captors of the true Israelite people who sinned against their Creator...but could you explain why you have this in your vids? thanks.

[TaylorX04]

@4everDOZ It's meant to piss off dipshits like you, who think Jews are impostors and that blacks are the "true Israelites." Fuck off, conspiracy theorist dumbass.

[r3ggi3000]

Spot on!

[grady1610]

The message of the cross is foolishness to the dead. Only God can bring you life.

[TaylorX04]

@grady1610 That's like saying Santa Claus is foolishness to those who disbelieve, but only believing in him can bring you presents. Such an excuse is only appealing to those who accept the fairytale - the same is true with Christians like yourself.

[TalonyPoo]

Whoa...what the hell would be the difference between that NWO and the Christians are convinced are happening right? Isn't the Antichrist supposed to do the same exact thing?

[carbonfconfusion]

whos the gguy at 8:31 ) belial?

[RaggedM88]

alot of interesting info... nice vids

[knightd00b]

Check Mate Atheists!!

[B0Boman]

For the record, immaculate conception is not the same thing as the virgin birth. Look it up.

[Paur]

5:14

Waaait.... create a central world government....

Isn't that the thing religous people think Satan and the Illuminati are trying to do?

And is the sheer amount of sheer irony there killing anyone besides me?

[TaylorX04]

@Paur Exactly. Those people don't want true freedom, they just want their regime/religion in power.

[exillens]

This vid certainly punches real logical holes in the B.S christian religion using the other older B.S religion that the christians base their illogical beliefs on. So with that said we need to realize that the old testament is B.S as well and the father of it. So Jews, Christians and Muslims need not worry or fight because you all believe enslaving, mind numbing, philosophical debased hogwash. So now go my children and live in peace. P.S send one or two of those 72 virgins my way. AsalamaLAKER

[IoannesBellator]

@exillens

But you haven't proven that Christianity is illogical. You only put forth your prejudice and antipathy towards it and then rationalize it so that it seems as if the logic and reason is presupposed upon proclaiming your hatred towards Christianity and the concept of God in general.

[helltrackrider]

@IoannesBellator

It is illogical to "believe" in anything when evidence is at your disposal to guide your otherwise...no need to prove that Christianity is illogical; it proves itself illogical through the beliefs laid out in the Old and New Testament...have you ever seen anyone emerge from their grave after death?...No...Is it logical to stone your kids to death for disobedience, amongst many other people for other arbitrary and illogical reasons?

[ndelamiko]

"Trust not the cross, it is yet too young."

[ndelamiko]

... unworthy of the POLITICAL power bestowed on them by the masses of humanity. This BELIEF is used, manipulated--and quite frankly from the beginning, the year dot as we say--for the purposes of a few corrupt people whose only interest is to turn mankind into their slaves. GOD EXISTS and there is NO SHAME in believing in GOD. Yet, I cannot judge a person for utterly rejecting Christianity and Judaism for the LIES they have perpetrated against humanity.

[ndelamiko]

Taylor, although you've asserted you're an atheist... I think somewhere deep inside you know there is a God. The problem I think, and you're quite right, is that placing your faith in MAN which is what Judaism, Christianity and Islam represent, is a fool's choice. All three of these 'religions' of the book, are flawed in their presentation, their revision of history to suit their purposes, and the absolute horrors they have inflicted on humanity in the name of 'God', are unworthy...

[bringonthewrath]

The last two messianic prophecy's in the OT sound like the prophecy's about the Anti-Christ in the NT maybe they knew the real messiah was going to come and did their best to cut him down so none would follow him.

[secretk33per]

I love atheists ^^ They speak the truth about the bible more than most ^^

[TaylorX04]

@altonnukem You know I'm Jewish? How did you arrive at this assumption, especially when it should be very clear from my avatar and my profile that I'm an atheist. I don't believe the Hebrew bible anymore than the Christian one, but the point of this video is that even by Jewish standards, Jesus could not have been the messiah.

[Keeban3]

Its exactly like prayer. He either has done it or its on his to do list. I got an idea though...lets just build the temple. That way, since peace on Earth and rebuilding of the temple don't coincide, we can cross off all three Abrahamic religions.

[MillyVanillification]

"the days" are constantly coming. thats only a prophecy for peope who are unable to extrapolate the fact, that the current day was once a day to come. furthermore there is not a single author of the scriptures. all of them have been manufactured over a long time. the entire case is ridiculous, because scripture is nothing than a compendium of fairy tales. its all about creating artificial history. there is no gods and there are no messiases or prophets.

[Youlube32]

New Testament author, singular. Matthew is the only NT author (aside from Luke's genealogy) that tries to connect Jesus with those "messainic" prophecies.

[TaylorX04]

Paul does it too, though not always as distinctly.

[tcgrayisraelisreal]

very very very good!! i love this, keep up the good work!!

[Shoefly3000]

"Whats a nigga gon do" What did that have to do with this presentation???

[TaylorX04]

Lighten up and learn to have a sense of humor.

[Seanze329]

@TaylorX04 I don't know, that seems a bit racist. :/

[Derrshmoz]

It's also worth mentioning that Jesus said he would return before the end of the apostles' generation.

[TaylorX04]

Wait till you get to part six. ;-)

[blattt188]

Yes, but the generation of the apostles is still ongoing since there are still Christ followers

[TaylorX04]

Matthew 16:27-28 says those STANDING IN THE AUDIENCE would not taste death before Jesus would return.

[Larsinger58]

The NT writers did not include Isaiah 53 because Isa 53 was about the 2nd coming messiah. However, Acts mentions Isa 53 in connection with the Ethipoian eunuch who read from here. So the Ethiopian Eunuch does become a foreshadowed PHYSICAL APPEARANCE of the 2nd messiah when he comes. So in that sense. So they do CONFIRM this is a messianic prophecy. Verses 2 and 3 are specific to a man, i.e. not handsom, no great body, etc. But it also refers to the nation of Israel as messiah.

[TaylorX04]

Your statements are ridiculous and empty speculation.

[applshmpoo]

The nation of Israel...as the...messiah...?

[Larsinger58]

correct. ISA 53 is NOT about the 1st coming messiah but the second. You must identify which passages are unique to the 1st or second coming and which are unique to the 1st, such as Isa 53 and Zech 3. Basically if it is a king-priest context or sinful messiah then it is the second coming, moshiach ben Joseph. Otherwise, the sinless messiah, unleavened bread, is the 1st messiah JC born perfect of a virgin. The 2nd wave offering is WITH LEAVEN and thus the 2nd coming in an imperfect body.

[TaylorX04]

You must not have paid attention to that the part where I noted that NO prophecy anywhere in the Old Testament speaks of the messiah having two "comings". If anyone has to identify the difference or context of that, it is you.

[ggcage]

There are several problems with this. For starters, in Isaiah 50, it contrasts between the Lord's servant and Isreal, so they aren't necessarily the same. Jesus fits the description so perfectly in 53, I don't see how it could be anything else.

Also, while the prophets may not have fully understood the two seperate comings, Jesus still came, fullfilled prophecies, performed miracles, (at the right/only time) said He'd come back and resurrected/ascended. He didn't 'miss the mark'

[TaylorX04]

"in Isaiah 50, it contrasts between the Lord's servant and Isreal"

Where exactly? The chapter talks of how God's servant learns to remain faithful during times of oppression, there's no separate discussion.

"Jesus fits the description so perfectly in 53, I don't see how it could be anything else."

You're saying that in retrospect. How do you know the gospel authors weren't simply familiar with Isaiah 53 and told Jesus' story to line up with it?

[TaylorX04]

(cont'd)

Jesus did not fulfill several prophecies, and many of the ones he "did" fulfill were based on misunderstandings of the gospel authors. You have faith that he'll return to finish the unfulfilled prophecies, but there is no prophecy of the messiah dying and rising again, to complete things later. Also, until Jesus makes his comeback and finishes the job, you really can't say he's fulfilled all the prophecies of the messiah.

[ggcage]

I don't see how the apostles could have 'lined up' Jesus's life to fit the prophecies, because then they would know that they were lying, and then to go out and preach the gospel, without any worldy gain, only to get themselves killed wouldn't make any sense at all.

Also, Jesus's resurrection is reffered to in Psalms 16:10. Also, what/who do you think Isaiah 53 is referring to?

[TaylorX04]

We don't know for sure that any of the gospel or New Testament authors were apostles of Jesus, but even if they were, there is no evidence that they willfully died for their beliefs either.

Psalm 16:10 says, "because you will not abandon me to the grave, nor will you let your Holy One see decay"... really? You think that refers to resurrection? Sorry, but it's way too vague to make that claim. Isaiah 53 refers to Israel, as do all of the servant songs in the book.

[ggcage]

Who else would the Holy One be? Who else has not seen decay? You could argue that we haven't, but that's nothing special, considering we haven't died.

If Isreal is in Is. 53, then who is the 'we' in "By his wounds we are healed". If its Isreal's wounds, then who is being healed?

[TaylorX04]

You're making an argument from ignorance here and a tremendous assumption. Why do you think there is a "Holy One" at all? You act like because you can imagine no one but Jesus, it must be referencing Jesus, but that's just not true.

You may want to watch my video "Isaiah 53 is Israel, Not Jesus". It better explains my interpretation of the passage.

[ggcage]

Very well then. I'll continue over there.

[applshmpoo]

The two words in Psalm 16:10 for 'grave' and 'decay' here are "SHe'OL" and "SHaCHaT" respectively. Both these words are used elsewhere to mean Hell. In Jonah 2:3 "out of the belly of the nether-world (she'ol) cried I". Psalm 55:24 "into the pit of corruption (B'ER SHaCHaT);".

I'd like to conjecture therefore, that Psalm 16:10 actually means "Because You will not abandon my soul to Hell, nor will You let your pious one see Hell". Also it does not say holy (KaDoSH) one it says pious one (CHaSiD).

[applshmpoo]

That was in response to ggcage asserting that it was referring to Jesus. It can just as easily be understood to mean that G-d will save his 'pious one' from Hell, ie. send him to heaven. This can easily be understood to mean David himself (especially since he's the one talking).

[formless777]

Jesus=FAIL. Mark 13:30 proves he was a false prophet.

[vwap10k]

Have you not read the scriptures?

Such as where the Psalmist speaking by the spirit says:

NAS Psalm 118:22 The stone which the builders rejected Has become the chief corner stone.

Let me guess, you must be one of the builders who made the huge error of rejecting God's chief corner stone?

[TaylorX04]

Why is it that no Christian seems to understand that quoting the bible doesn't mean a thing to a non-believer? Let me advise you: it's best to keep quiet and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

[cookiemonsterog]

What's a nigga gon do? You idiot. Now I see why God stated in Malachi 1:2-3 that he loved Jacob (chosen people of color) and hated Esau (white edomites). Your lying race (heathens) wrote the new testament to fit in with their fake christainity. They are not from the BRANCH or any of the tribes of Israel. The imposter, edomites currently in Israel, will soon see their destruction, and God's chosen people shall be returned to their rightful land.

[TaylorX04]

Another black supremacist trying to find an excuse to hate white people. It's too bad that there is actually no scripture to support your idea that Jacob was black and Esau was white. The bible actually says Esau was red, not white (Gen. 25:25). Jacob was also a deceiver, which the phrase "to grasp the heel" means in Gen. 25:26. Do you really want to associate your race with someone who was known as a deceiver?

Give up these ancient superstitious fairytales and do something good with your life.

[AxCUNNINGxSTUNT]

Cheers dude! At 4:30 you made me laugh so much.

[SiriusLordoflisan7]

You are funny as hell. I see the joke "What A Nigga Gon Do". It reminds me of the black jokes on the Boondocks.

[LordHines420]

the one thing most ppl dont realize is that there is rly not reason at all to believe a single word in the jewbull at all. once i realized this, the rest became.... history?

[peartreeven]

Heli is Joseph's father-in-law and uncle. Is not Jewish custom to consider the father-in-law, a father too?

[peartreeven]

You claim the servant in Isa53 is Isreal. So plz explain when was Isreal cut off from the living in Isa53:8?

What about 53:9- "he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth."??

What about Isa53:12 "bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors."??

So Israel borne the sins of Israel and prayed for the sinners? And how is Israel healed by his stripes in Isa 53:5??

[TaylorX04]

I have responded to these questions in a new video. Check it out if you like and feel free to comment on it.

[peartreeven]

You assume from Scripture that sacrifices will resume. This isnt literal we see from Ezekiel 47 described "the waters came down from under from the right side of the house, at the south side of the altar."

the waters were to the anklesthe waters were to the knees the waters were to the loins.. the waters were risen, waters to swim in, a river that could not be passed over.

This temple holds the living waters that give eternal life ie Jesus (John2:21 But he spake of the temple of his body)

[TaylorX04]

Wow, this is just sheer speculation. Ezekiel 47 references water and so you associate it with the "living water" Jesus speaks of in John 2:21? But how does ANY of this negate sacrifices resuming during the reign of the messiah?

[peartreeven]

NOT speculation its Scripture. The waters flow from the temple and reach the ankle, then waist, then to depths that one can swim in, then so deep no one can cross (Eze47;1-5). So cant be literal. Eze47:9 states where the river flows EVERYTHING WILL LIVE and the trees by banks wont wither

Eze 47;12 Their leaves will not wither, nor will their fruit fail. Every month they will bear, because the water from the sanctuary flows to them. Their fruit will serve for food and THEIR LEAVES FOR HEALING

[peartreeven]

This is the living waters described in Revelation 22:

1.And he shewed me a pure river of WATER OF LIFE, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb. IE Temple Holy of Holies

2.......on either side of the river, was there the TREE OF LIFE, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the LEAVES of the tree were FOR THE HEALING of the nations.

[TaylorX04]

And where among any of this does it state that temple sacrifices would not be resumed by the messiah? Connect the dots that are there, don't try to make your own.

[peartreeven]

Taylor, it doesnt say that in Scripture. Indeed the only eg. you gave Mal 3:4 states Offering (minchah) and not blood sacrifice (korban). This is clear in Scripture that the offering is that of the heart.

Psalm 51:16 You do not delight in sacrifice, or I would bring it; you do not take pleasure in burnt offerings.

17 The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; a broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise.

[TaylorX04]

Actually, the Hebrew word "mincha" can refer to anything a person offers up voluntarily too. Malachi 1:13 clearly talks of animal sacrifice and uses the word and I would argue that Malachi 1:11 also uses it to refer to animal sacrifice, since it says a PURE offering. How could grain, flour, or prayer be "pure"?

Psalm 51:16-17 actually is yet another example of God's disapproval of human sacrifice, not of general sacrifice. 51:14 has David asking God to "save [him] from bloodguilt".

[peartreeven]

Korban is animal sacrifice. Minchah thus doesnt mean sacrifices will be resumed. I did not say grain or prayer offering. I refer to Psalm 51:16, which is an offering of the heart and indeed it must be pure or God will not accept an impure heart.

[TaylorX04]

Psalm 51:16 is not merely an offering of the heart, it refers to David wanting to offer up his own blood to relieve him of his "bloodguilt".

Today, mincha is mostly taken to be a grain/flour offering or prayer, but as I pointed out, there are biblical passages that clearly indicate that mincha could refer to animal sacrifices too, because mincha may be anything offered up voluntarily.

[peartreeven]

Taylor, I accept that mincha does mean offering of anything. However, I cant see anywhere in Scripture to show that animal sacrifices will resume as this goes against Isaiah's vision of the end of suffering and death, even of animals.

Even the trees will not wither.

[TaylorX04]

Well, you may have a point, but I haven't really even argued that animal sacrifice is key to the issue. If the messiah does not resume offerings at the temple (not in a metaphorical sense), then he is not the messiah. It's right there in scripture. What do you think "as in days gone by, as in former years" means in the verse?

[peartreeven]

Taylor, I would suggest the offering of a contrite heart as in Psalm 51. God did not ask for literal sacrifices. This is in Scripture.

Jeremiah 7:21 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Put your burnt offerings unto your sacrifices, and eat flesh. 22 For I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices:

[peartreeven]

Jeremiah 7;23 But this thing commanded I them, saying, Obey my voice, and I will be your God, and ye shall be my people: and walk ye in all the ways that I have commanded you,

[TaylorX04]

It has become abundantly clear that you will continue to willfully ignore when you are mistaken. You keep suggesting that Psalm 51 is not just an offering of a contrite heart, but that it supersedes Mosaic Law. I have told you three times now that David speaks of his bloodguilt in verse 14, and it is not a prohibition on animal sacrifice, it is clearly a reminder of God's distaste for HUMAN sacrifice. Jeremiah 7:21-23 only says more of how God wants a pure heart AND sacrifice (not "or").

[peartreeven]

Taylor

Wast refuting your elaboration of Ps51. If you read my post I wrote "I would suggest" in reply to your question you last posted-citing Jer 7 to support it. Genesis 1:28-30 state animals werent originally created for food. This not consistent with a loving,kind God who promises the end of all deaths and suffering. Dont you see the contradiction that sacrifices under Torah are to atone for sins? If God only accepts sacrifices from the righteous, plz explain what Torah sacrifices are about?

[peartreeven]

Ge 1:28 And God blessed them, ... and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth... God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.And to every beast of the earth, .... and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat

[peartreeven]

Did you know that the Essences did not believe in the literal interpretation of Moses Law? They also claimed that the Messiah was here to end animal sacrifices. Indeed, no one today would dream of executing the literal stoning of an adulterer to death, or for breaking Shabbat.

[TaylorX04]

Lol, I've never said it's literally water, but your interpretation still isn't even remotely connected to whether or not the messiah would resume temple sacrifices.

[peartreeven]

You quoted Isaiah 65:25 about peace on earth and lion eating straw like ox; wolf and lamb feed together, but had not realised that this refers to the new paradise earth, and after the destruction of the existing earth as specified in Isaiah 24.

Isa24:20 The EARTH SHALL REEL TO AND FRO like a drunkard, and shall be removed like a cottage; and the transgression thereof shall be heavy upon it; and it shall fall, and NOT RISE AGAIN.

Isa 65:17 For, behold, I CREATE NEW HEAVENS AND A NEW EARTH:

[TaylorX04]

No, I am well aware that Isaiah 65:25 is a reference to the Messianic Era, because I SAY IT IN THE VIDEO. You Christians just pretend that it will come when Jesus returns, but please find me a prophecy of the messiah needing to arrive on Earth twice to finish his mission. Everything else you say here is totally irrelevant.

[peartreeven]

Isa 65:25 doesnt reference Messianic Era but refers to the new paradise earth after the resurrection of the dead and only for those found in the book of life. Verse 65:17 states new earth and heaven.

Scripture doesnt say Jesus will come again as Messiah. Messiah's been. It is very specific that when he next come, Jesus comes as God.

Rev 1:7 Look, he is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, even those who pierced him; and all the peoples of the earth will mourn because of him.

[peartreeven]

Isaiah 11:11 IN THAT DAY the Lord will reach out his hand a SECOND TIME to reclaim the remnant that is left of his people

The Lord being the operative word here. Jesus will come as God and all eyes will see him this time.

[peartreeven]

Taylor, I have so much to comment on this vid that I dont know where to begin. Here goes, though not in any order.

Re Sabbat:

Isa 1:13 Bring no more vain oblations; incense is an abomination unto me; the new moons and sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot away with; it is iniquity, even the solemn meeting.

Isa 1:14 Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth: they are a trouble unto me; I am weary to bear them.

Jesus know God's priority when it comes to interpretation.

[TaylorX04]

Isaiah 1:13-14 are God speaking to Sodom and Gomorrah, as you can read in verse 10. It was not about canceling the Sabbath, but only about how Sodom and Gomorrah perverted their worship of God by being sinful and disobedient. Nice try, but no dice.

[peartreeven]

Taylor, Isaiah 1 is NOT about Sodom and Gomorrah, which was destroyed before Moses' time and before Moses Law. Understand that God refers to wicked and sinful nations and peoples as Sodom and Gomorrah. There are other Sodom/Gomorrah references like such elsewhere in bible.

[TaylorX04]

I realize this, but you're still ignoring the context. God doesn't like people who sacrifice to him or worship him when they're in constant sin. Those verses are by no means a rejection of Old Testament law.

[peartreeven]

Taylor,

Is Moses Law to be adhered to or not? Is the Sabbath law compulsory for everyone? Or are sinners and wicked ppl exempt, but only to be observed by the righteous?

Exodus 31:14-15 specified that those breaking Shabbat be put to death and this is demonstrated when man stoned to death for working on Shabbat (Numbers 15:33-36). Yet in Isa 1 God says otherwise.

So now, it is clear that the Law is not meant to be interpreted the way the Pharisees interpreted them. Jesus knows better.

[TaylorX04]

The Noahide laws were given for all mankind to follow, not the Mosaic Law. Non-Jews did not need to observe the Sabbath.

I already explained to you that Isaiah 1:10-16 is admonition for God's people to be clean before they give offerings or sacrifices, it is NOT in any way against the Law.

[Symos]

I've had some time to think about something and well, I think Jesus knew he wasn't the real thing (assuming he was a real guy). He warns of others claiming to be the messiah and denounces them and antichrists. Now I don't exactly know how much weight this holds, but a book called Survivers by Zion Ben-Jonah has a character use the UN to form a world government, rebuild the temple and in this case usher a temporary peace. He's the antichrist. People may fear and reject the real messiah.

[Symos]

"Create a central world government in Israel." Ironically christians are the ones most worried about a so called "New World Order" and one world government.

[TaylorX04]

Yeah, that one cracked me up when I first heard about it. Someone should notify Alex Jones!

[GODLOVESUSSOMUCH]

Well my friend, not only is the Elites (Who have proven ties to the occult, New World Order Agenda a nearing fulfilment of the antichrists nearing kingdom, but in truth, God prepared his children very well with his word, allowing us to understand whats nearing and why we have no need to fear it. Sure i can still see some Christians who won't understand the relation to the days ahead & the great tribulation, yet many more godless people will fear the worst as it nears.

[TaylorX04]

You people have not proven a damn thing about your conspiracy theory bullshit. It's all speculation, based on hearsay and imaginative thinking. I guess I shouldn't be surprised that Christians are easily duped into nonsensical conspiracy theories though.

[GODLOVESUSSOMUCH]

Hey bro! It'd be nice to see someone who seems like an objective truth seeker, show some composure when conversing, even when in great disagreement. I just want to say that your efforts to examine God's word are great. Jesus Christ is mentioned in all 3 Abrahamic religions & from 12-30 Christ Traveled, learning & teaching to with many. Jesus is accepted as a prophet by all 3 A.R's. Jesus spread the Truth in Great Love & Service to his Father. His claims were not lies, but God's word made flesh!

[GODLOVESUSSOMUCH]

I ask one thing of you my brother. I ask that when you see God's prophetic word being fulfilled further during the next several years, as millions know they have already have begun, that you will seek Jesus Christ out before you deny his love & outstretched hand. Btw my friend, i am amazed that you seem energetic in learning, yet you've let the whole history of satans corruption through the elite be denied. Be Watchful & Rdy, for the Antichrist will deceive many by fulfilling Jew/Muslim prophecy

[TaylorX04]

Clearly you have been brainwashed by the cult of Christianity. People have been saying the endtimes are near for centuries, even Jesus and his disciples believed it was going to be a few decades after their lives, at the latest.

As for "satans corruption through the elite", those are just empty buzz words conspiracy theorists use. Do you care to elaborate, or just make unsupported paranoid assertions?

[TaylorX04]

Don't talk to me about composure when you come on my video spouting conspiratorial crap. I can't see that you've really made any efforts to examine "God's word", since you reference things that indicate nothing about the truth or lie of the bible. Judaism does not mention or accept Jesus and Muslims believe his message was corrupted. Get your facts straight, my non-objective personal truth seeking friend.

[IanBillings00]

It is people like this, who use their nonsensical beliefs to justify irrational conclusions about government, who will become the real threatening opposition to what will ineviatably be the goal of human civilization - globalization.

Globalization will be the next step for civilization. It needs to happen so that humans may stop fighting and being xenophobic of eachother. This is the only way we can prevent total destruction of human civilization. This antichrist story is hindering our race.

[rtarzwell]

Very good video, but at 4:26 you state, "Traditional Christianity holds that he was immaculately conceived." Not so.

The Immaculate Conception is the doctrine that Mary was conceived without the stain of original sin, to be a pure vessel for Christ. It applies to her, not Jesus.

The Doctrine of the Virgin Birth is what traditional Christians espouse regarding Jesus.

I don't want Catholics to nail your videos on silly technicalities.

[Sight099]

I believe that's what he said.

[schradww00]

This video series drives the final nail into the proverbial cross!

[tekhiun]

chtulu fuck yeah !

[SophistAtheist]

WOW thank u soo much

[EdwardHowton]

The image at 9:00 represents (albeit conservatively) how full of holes the biblical story is.

*(Yes, I know those are probably there to help people find the beginning of each book or chapter.)

[thruthem]

Oh boy! What direction do I grovel in now?

[inmyheart313131]

Brilliant, just brilliant!

[freethinker3161]

great job Taylor, this was excellent.

[mtsac1]

WIN!

[iluvhsw]

Great video but I have 2 disagreements. David didn't write Psalms and Daniel is not a major prophet according to the Jews.

[TaylorX04]

Psalms is attributed to David at least, and I do believe it's probably the work of multiple authors. I can't say I know many Jews who reject Davidic authorship of the Psalms though. I am aware that Jews don't think Daniel was a prophet, but I really just pulled the list from my NIV bible. Daniel really doesn't have anything to do with the messiah, so I figured it wasn't relevant to the video. Thanks for your comments though and I'm glad you liked the video! :-)

[sonoflipoic]

two thumbs up!

[colonelkentucky81]

Awesome vid! A lot of great information.

[SeenAndNotSeen]

At least Simon bar Kochba fulfilled SOME of the duties of the messiah, which is more than can be said of Jesus. Who's to say that bar Kochba isn't going to return to earth and fulfill the rest of the prophecies? Moreover, if the messiah gets to make two trips, then almost anyone could potentially be considered the messiah, since they could just return to earth and fulfill the prophecies then.

[utukkuxul]

My money is still on Manson.

Kidding.

[grungefreak10]

Really, if I had to join an Abrahamic religion, it would be Judaism.

I remember when Chairman Mel's ultraviolent hit movie came out, I read on a message board a post about the Jewish view of the Messiah, and if I were to accept the Old Testament (not that I do) their vision of the Messiah made more sense.

[ih82bzero]

please take no offense to my comment below i was just rying to be funny.

i watched parts 1 and 2 and now 3 keep up the good work

[ih82bzero]

im making a messiah too but my messiah is coming equipped with karate chop action.