Total disasters in American politics: Electing Bush, initiating the Iraq War, constructing a faith based administration run by evangelicals, opposing gay marriage, electing Bush again, initiating a surge, water boarding, GITMO, nominating this moron for VP, and that old fuck McBush for president (while ignoring Ron Paul). All this shifted the country center-left in 2008. Fuck, now we have one more authoritarian nut in the white house.
I am a libertarian republican. I think she is a total dumbass! It's way beyond scary to see her lead the polls -- beating Ron Paul and Gary Johnson, the only libertarians in the GOP.
POOR SARAH! Like Mother, like son: retards!! Like Mother, like daughter: sluts and cheap whores! Oh well, you can't have 'em all, bitches!! Hey, Gal, wipe that blood off your hands! But then: it probably won't come off!!
She needs to learn better posture. Her posture is hideous. I'm not saying everyone needs to have great posture, or that it's REQUIRED to be whatever. But I don't think it's unimportant. If you are ABLE to sit right, and you expect to be taken seriously and be perceived in a positive way in the kind of position that she's taken on... it's probably a good idea to have good posture, just like it's a good idea to know how to spell correctly, etc.
This isn't just the Bush doctrine, it's how people behave and are legally allowed to behave. You don't have to wait until you're punched in the face to defend yourself. We as a nation don't have to wait until we're bombed to act in self-defence. That said, Iraq was no threat and our "pre-emptive strike" was not self-defence.
@nieten7642 um, i took AP US history a couple of years ago in 10th grade and i learned what the bush doctrine is. i dont want the leaders of this country not knowing the rationale bush came up with so that we'd go to war against iraq. she should have said then that she did not know what it was, and asked Charlie to explain what it was exactly and answered it then. Agree or not? she tried to pretend she knew wth she was saying. which is defined by many as "stumped"
@ClassicFIHD Maybe not, but it is her RESPONSIBILITY as a potential government elected official to know. Look, anyone that picked up a newspaper, read an online news article or watched televised news knew what the Bush Doctrine is/was -- if you're trying to make your argument, why didn't she say something like, "I'm not following your question, can you explain?" SHE DIDN'T -- She tried to put it back on him like she was smarter than him. She's proven too many times that's she's just stupid.
@CaribbeanLounger "but it is her RESPONSIBILITY" BULL! What politician has a "RESPONSIBILITY" what crap a lies the media spews out? And again, there were 4 versions. Hell I would not even expect Obzoz the know what crap the media spits out. Sorry, but I prefer my leaders to know what's in the constitution and in REAL government documents. Even Obozo was wrong on constitutional issues and what about the pass Couric gave Biden on his FDR/stock market crash/ going on TV comment?
@ClassicFIHD Are you seriously this fucking retarded or are you showing off for some toothless hooker that's doing meth in your trailer?! If you're so fucking stupid that you want to play the "5 versions" game, then you're fucking dumber than the caribou that A&E tranquilized to get 'hunted" by the fucktard Palin in her 'reality' show. Unfortunately, your fucking 'leaders' are regurgitated sound bytes that wouldn't know the fucking constitution, nor the hint of reality if it bit them in the ass.
@CaribbeanLounger "why didn't she say something like, "I'm not following your question, can you explain" And she asked "I what respect Charlie" In fact she even gave a correct answer to one of the four media versions, just not the one Gibson has in mind.
@ClassicFIHD Seriously/! I answered your fucking moronic question in my last post. Do the world or nation a favor and castrate yourself so you don't have the opportunity to impregnate the goat that lives in your basement the your mother fucked (after all, how do you think you were born) and have a kid. If it that child was anywhere near human (which is doubtful) they should practice stabbing themselves in the sack or vagina to keep them from spreading your fucktard seed. I hope you go slowly
Sarah had a chance here to earn some respect from me. It didn't matter as much to me that she didn't know what this media created term meant; what mattered is that she couldn't admit that she didn't know something, and tried to BS her way through the conversation to avoid looking stupid. If she had plead ignorance - "What doctrine are you talking about?" I would have had a lot more respect for her.
As far as her being confused, yeah she was, but as far as there actually being a Bush Doctrine, NO there wasn't an actual doctrine it's a phrase that was coined by the media. Get over your stupid liberal self.
@tcon26 and also the question was extrememly vague so i would have been like clarify on what you are asking me. Period. Half you idiots wouldn't have know where to start either.
It is actually a very useful response. Sometimes questions are phrased ambiguously and sometimes you don't hear or catch what exactly the person is asking and misunderstand it.
Her problem was that it was a vague question about something that didn't really exist outside the nomenclature of the media think-tanks.
She was unprepared for dealing with vague questions.
As much as i HATE her i feel bad for her she must be embaraced rly they made it up or was clearly confused i watched mcain say it but it might hav been made up cuz WHO CARES WHAT BUSH SAYS HE IS THE WORST PRESIDENT THIS COUNTRY HAS HAD (sorry to go off)
Yes, liberteeen is correct. However, if you want a more formal definition, why don't you ask John McCain. He talked about it in the 2005 documentary "why we fight." So I'm pretty sure her running mate knew what it was. Just watch the video in my message to lees20022.
the word doctrine is defined as a set of rules or beliefs.
In september 2002 the bush administrations "National Security Strategy of the United States" was published which is the basis for what people refer to as "the bush doctrine"
an educated politician should be able to piece this together, let alone one that is running for vice president of the united states.
My point is simply this: The interviewer should have stated what 'the Bush doctrine" was and asked her view. He should have done that, rather than state the name that was given to it by the media.
@liberteeen sure sounds like a liberal if I ever heard one. I sure wonder what you think about Obama doing whatever HE wants without congress' approval. Bush would have been impeached in an instant if he tried to pull Obama's stunt in Libya.
Oh and Charlie, what do you think about Acorn..... oh, I don't know what you are talking about. Gibson is so uninformed. And you have it right about the Obama doctrine --- supporting his buddies, the socialist dictators. Very sad and scary.
Again, you would have to specify which one you are talking about. Snubbing our allies, conceding to our enemies, or supporting fledgling socialist dictatorships.
Heh. I like McCain, but give me a break. I'm sure she is a nice lady, but the only thing she is qualified for is a managerial position at the local Denny's.
You're right that Palin was trying to feel her way around until she could guess what Gibson was talking about, and that she looked stupid doing so. The problem is that there are four definitions of "Bush Doctrine," and Gibson only knew 3, so he cited the 3rd one. He had to make himself look stupid to make Palin look stupid(which is pretty pathetic) and, in doing so, he made most of America look stupid by pretending that they knew he was talking about the 3rd definition before he defined it.
You missed my point entirely mojo. What is the purpose of using language that is only used by current political science students and political pundits? He knew that nobody would use this language because its use requires definition. He even confused himself in the process! And they couldn't find a way to trick the genius Joe Biden?
This country deserves what it is going to get. Its lesson time. Just look at your fearless leader's organization ACORN. Own it bitch, its yours!
I'm 20 years old and I knew what the Bush Doctrine was. Most people with half a political brain do. The fact of the matter is that she couldn't even give a response that was remotely relevant to ANY of the definitions. And look at you cry, boo hoo hoo, waahh, Joe Biden never got tricked!!! wahh wahh wahh, you wanna know why? Because Joe Biden knows what the BUSH DOCTRINE is... because he's not an idiot. How can you defend such idiocy? Change the subject there too, hahahaha, you are laughable
So you believe that anyone who doesn't know what the Bush Doctrine is must be an idiot? I run into idiots every day. Doctors, lawyers, CPAs, you name it! The higher the education level, the more likely I am to quiz them on the Bush Doctrine. It's my own little study. Boy are they stupid! They don't know what the Bush Doctrine is. Nothing is more important than the lingo of political pundits. Now say 10 Charles Krauthammers, 40 Charlie Gibsons, and go fuck yourself!
You are exactly right. This is exactly what Gibson did. The "Bush Doctrine" is a fairly meaningless term and is subjective on many levels.
Actually, Palin asking "In what respect, Charlie?" was a perfectly appropriate response. Gibson asking "Well... what do YOU think it means?" was a "gotcha journalism" move. He was trying to set her up to fail, not get an informative answer out of her.
On the contrary, the "Bush Doctrine" is not subjective at all. It is basically, "preemptive action instead of action". And while it is true that it is rather general, this lack of specification from Gibson gave Palin the opportunity to give her opinion to all aspects of it.
And I seriously believe that any politician aspiring to be the United States VP should at least know the United States' foreign policies.
Furthermore, while i believe that Gibson did quite deliberately bait Palin, I believe that it was "a perfectly appropriate response" on his part. I mean, he didn't want her to fail. Why?? He only wanted to make sure that Palin actually knew about US foreign policy, to test her knowledge about the country she wants to lead, because it seemed that the moment he asked that question she was stumped.
@QaFeRo - Yes, he absolutely did try to bait her. At least we can agree on that point. And yes, he did want her to fail. He and most of the rest of the media rarely ask Obama "baiting" questions like this.
Her answer was perfectly appropriate for the reasons I laid out earlier. Not knowing exactly what a liberal is referring to when they say "Bush Doctrine" is hardly being stumped.
@QaFeRo... actually, you are wrong. "Bush Doctrine" means a lot of different things to a lot of different people. It is a term used mostly by those who didn't/don't agree with many of George W. Bush's foreign relation policies... thus the reason for Palin not being as intimately familiar with the liberal "code" (term) as Gibson was. It is a concept that is made of of an amalgamation of various specific foreign policies that Bush's opposition uses to lump all of them together. It is a fluid term.
Also her "interpretation" of the BD, disregarding the fact that the doctrine as a whole was quite clear and left no room for mindless interpretation by mindless airheads, was quite vague. After Gibson helped her out by giving her a timeframe ("September 2002, before the Iraq war"), she was able to bullshit this response about terrorism and muslim extremists. And while the BD is about that, her response gave no indication that she actually knew, much less understood the gist of it.
Well, he's the one asking the question, so he should be familiar with the terminology that he is using. Unfortunately, he's using bullshit political pundit speak that has no meaning to most people.
You think Charlie Gibson didn't know what the bush doctrine was before he asked Sarah? he just wanted to see if her molly hobby ass knew
she's dumb! and ppl like you will defend her idiotic exploits til the death. So sad she quit at being the governor of alaska yet you think she can run the whole shebang??? I see through you
To think she could have been a heartbeat away from running this country is mortifying. To think hardcore Republicans still support her. Hannity, Limbaugh, Rove, O'Reilly and Dick Morris all just gush whenever her name is mentioned and fall in line to support her. What is wrong with this party? Seriously?
What's wrong with this party? Yes, how terrible it is that Palin is rejecting so much of Obama's stimulus money with those strict building codes. It's terrible that Palin wouldn't want to contribute to our nation's deficit! It's also horrible that the Republicans have been voting against the big bailouts of large corporations. What's wrong with them? It's time the Republicans stood on some principles.
You know I read daily both local and international papers online and this question would have stumped me. I would have said a doctrine for what? now if he had asked what do you think about Bush's idea of foreign policy. I'd be able to answer. he was being kind of a dick about it.
Fair enough that you might not recognize the specific term 'Bush Doctrine'. The only problem is that you (to the best of my knowledge) have never been in the position of almost becoming the Vice President of the United States. She should have known this. The problem with saying "well I didn't know this, so it's okay if she doesn't" is that we should want our leaders to be more informed, and better equipped to make decisions.
Yep; I'm in Japan right now, and if McCain and Palin had won, I would've ran off to Tokyo and pleaded for asylum. Palin's a total MILF, but I don't want her to be in a position where she's running my country!
@ezra2662 You are ignorant XD We already are in serious shit OBAMA= One Bad Ass Mistake America plus we always will be in serious shit US is 12 trillion dollars in debt to the rest of the world as we speak its growing.
Even an untrained monkey could have given a smarter response than Palin. She had an open playing field, in that she could have stated her own interpretation of what the Bush doctrine is, then given a prefab answer.
"In what respect Charlie?" Such a fool. She actually thought she could trick him into telling her.
What he should have said is, "I don't know what you just said, Charlie. What does that word, "doctrine" mean, Charrrrlie?"
How can you try to defend this imbecile? If you're going to be running for one of the highest powered spots in the United States Government. It is NEEDED THAT YOU KNOW POLICIES SUCH AS THIS. This is an absolute disgrace.
Caroline Kennedy looks like a genius compared to Palin; but, so does burnt toast.
President-elect Obama just called on Congress to pass his new economic recovery plan. It's an ambitious program to save or create 3 million jobs while investing in health care, clean energy & green jobs.
Yet, the right wing is prepared to fight against him with everything they've got. They don't want to pay for key provisions like health care for kids & laid-off workers. They only want MORE tax cuts for the rich.
The right's economic plan is to massively cut taxes on all segments of society, particularly on buisness. The left's economic plan is to create a long term partisan socialist state. Clearly, the right is stimulating jobs more. So no. Palin would have been better than the weak willed Obama, who can't control his senate or congress.
And incidentally, she got the meaning of the Bush doctrine right. It is about spreading democracy to Islamic states. Bush changed it when they found no wmd.
hey guys, if u had to describe america as any livivng creature, wat would it be ? i think, a massive dinasaur, really big and powerfull, but with a tiny brain. O wait, sorry, most ppl in America, perticularly the bible belt, dont believe in dinasours...hahahaha, NO am joking i'm very pro american in many ways, its just a shame that the Intelectuals are confined to scientific advancements while the stupidest people seem to be leading this awsome country. peace
How does this video prove she doesn't know what the Bush doctrine is? According to wikipedia, there is at least 3 parts to it. Gibson assumes she doesn't know and explains it after she offers a legitimate answer.
does the Bush Doctrine apply if it is the citizens of the United States vs. the US Government? "hit them before they hit us." ...or would the citizens be criminals for such an act? I'll have to research that.
The Bush Doctrine isn't a simple one-point issue Charlie. Protecting our country from Islamic-extremists and terrorism is the the reason the Bush Doctrine was made in the first place Charlie! I was simply asking you what fucking section of the Bush Doctrine you were referring CHARLIE! - That's how she should of responded to Charlie, and the left-wing Obama worshipers.
rid the world of "islamic extremism" - nothing about any other religion though, nothing on christian extremism, but of course that would mean ridding the world of her...
The reason you don't hear about christian extremism is because christians don't believe we should blow ourselves to pieces in the name of our God (or Allah). And the far left has made it clear that they hate Christians already...
Thats true you shouldn't HATE somebody because of what they believe in. but should you be able to make fun of their "stupidity"? yes i think so.
come on now people..religion? what a joke. I mean sure it may be true. but who knows? just like some people believe there are aliens. why? because we have a couple videos of unexplainable objects in the sky. So if i said i wear tin foil hats to keep the aliens out of my brain theres no reason to question my sanity?
No,you still shouldn't be able to make fun of their "stupidity".Unless you are a professional in whatever they are stating...who are you to judge?I don't judge somebody because they don't believe in God.I don't judge somebody because they do or don't believe in aliens.That's not my job.
why can't i judge them? i can do whatever i want. as long as i'm not hurting them or hurting their "feelings". it may be wrong to completely write someone off or make judgements about them that aren't relevant to the subject. But besides that why not? they don't have to listen. and i say stupidity loosely i didn't mean they are stupid people. But from my view they are ACTING stupid in their beliefs. But no i'd never hate someone because of their beliefs.
when he talks of a bush doctrine, his "version of it" as he stated after palin, was more general than what would be the much more detailed doctrine of the bush administration.
she was right in asking in what respect.
I dont see how this video discredits her intelligence.
his idea of the bush doctrine relating to the iraq war is again also still too general in that respect.
so, it's no wonder that he wasn't satisfied with palin's response.
No, he specifically refers to 2002 - this is when the pre-emptive policy was declared. You'd think the future Vice-president would know something about that.
And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman,young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword. 24 And they burnt the city with fire, and all that was therin : only the silver, and the Gold, and the vessels of brass, they put into the treasury .. And the Lord said unto Joshua ...And thou shalt do to Ai and her king as thou didst unto Jericho !!!Vote Sarah Palin 2008 !!She has a Task from God !
The bush doctrine is one of the most dangerous policies I've ever heard. That means they can attack ANYONE, for no reason, and justify it through propaganda and lies. I mean, fuck, no one is safe if Palin and McCain get into the white house. The idea of preemptive strike plays on American's fear post-911 and would allow war criminals free reign to commit all the murder they want. Fucking insane Orwellian doctrine.
I want to hear YOU explain the Bush Doctrine. It is very complicated, which is why she asked a clarification question. It is highly insulting as a woman to listen to people rip her intelligence apart. If she were ugly or a man, we would not be subjected to most of this "news." She is an elected official; have some respect.
not the first time she's not understood or answered a question. he didn't ask her to explain the doctrine, he asked her if she agrees with it, and she didn't know what it was... at all, not one bit. yes, it may be complicated, but as someone running for VP, ya should know what it is! this clearly shows her ignorance when it comes to foreign affiars. she may not be a total dumbass BUT she isn't intelligent enough to be VP or god forbid our president one day. she doesn't even know the VP's job.
Oh my god, at the end she still didn't even know after the interviewer explained it to her! lol "If a strike against america is imminent" - it was above pre-emptive strikes against other countries, not countries striking america. lol Dumbass, how can ANYONE take her seriously.
She didn't know what the Bush Doctrine is! No one can refute--this is proof. She didn't even know what it is! That's not misspeaking--that is gross ignorance if you're trying to be the freakin' Vice Prez
President Bush has been challunged much over the last years by the enumies of Jesus and has triumphed dispite the odss!! He has prepaird the soil for Sarah to plant the seeds of Jesus !!! A vote for Sara is a vote for Jesus !! Halleluia !!!
Sarah Palin is an Angel sent by God to lift the Spirit of Witchcraft from America.. she will bring the glory of God into every aspect of American Life from our childrens schools, to the supreme Court and the White House !!! No more "Scientific" nonsense about "Evolution" and "Global Warming " taught to our Children !!! No more dirty books in Public Libraries to poisen our childrens minds !!!! Halleluia !! May the fire of Jesus cleanse America of Evil !!!
Hahaha very convincing! You had me going there! "The spirit of witchcraft"... very cute, that's exactly how those medieval douchebags think! I love irony on youtube.
Bravo, to a highly intelligent, very moral woman! Shame on those who bash her, except oh yeah they support a candidate who promises "CHANGE". Pretty scared of what that change might be. McCain/ Palin, standing up for our safety and our freedoms. But I guess we're supposed to opposed to that. This chic is for honor and patriotism and McCain/Palin have both!
Spoken with such intelligence and class! Please, spare us this ridiculous garbage your spewing next time you think about commenting. Screen name suits you!
Sarah Palin gave a correct definition of the Bush Doctrine! She said President Bush is trying to rid the world of Islamic extremists who support terrorism. This is the policy statement Bush made after the 9/11 attacks. "From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime." Look it up on wikipedia for yourself! Palin was clearly refering to the 2001 definition of the Bush doctrine.
Look it up on Wikipedia? are you kidding me?! Try using a credible source next time. We dont have enough time in the world to explain what the question meant to either you or Palin.
There is NO SINGLE DEFINITION for the Bush Doctrine! The definition Charlie Gibson gave has been superseeded. Too bad Charlie didn't do his homework. There have been four very different versions of the Bush Doctrine articulated over the years, as Charles Krauthammer correctly noted. Charlie should have been straightforward and just asked her what she though of using pre-emptive force. Not only did Gibson come across as snooty, but Gibson didn't even get the definition right!
I am going to miss this when this election is over. Her idiotic responses are so entertaining. It is like putting my mom out of the kitchen and BAM! you are running for the VP.
Palin is as dumb as a box of rocks!
formerlymiddleclass 1 week ago
she's still hot as fuck
qukarlz 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
shes smarter than every single one of you dumbasses
mathisfan27 1 month ago
who cares what the bush doctrine is..90 percent of the country doesn't know what it is
Vertigo2903 2 months ago
she only good at 2 things
8soccer4life8 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
just study
knowledge is power
dhksrksalem 6 months ago
Comment removed
dhksrksalem 6 months ago
I agree with the Democrats LOSING 63 House seats!!!
mgallant01 6 months ago
Just look at her posture. Does that convey any sort of confidence??
eajinabi 7 months ago
Total disasters in American politics: Electing Bush, initiating the Iraq War, constructing a faith based administration run by evangelicals, opposing gay marriage, electing Bush again, initiating a surge, water boarding, GITMO, nominating this moron for VP, and that old fuck McBush for president (while ignoring Ron Paul). All this shifted the country center-left in 2008. Fuck, now we have one more authoritarian nut in the white house.
LogicalFlawDetector 7 months ago
I am a libertarian republican. I think she is a total dumbass! It's way beyond scary to see her lead the polls -- beating Ron Paul and Gary Johnson, the only libertarians in the GOP.
LogicalFlawDetector 7 months ago
To be fair, the Bush Doctrine = Traditional US foreign policy.
LogicalFlawDetector 7 months ago
Sarah Palin needs to learn the words, "I don't know". Apparently, she doesn't know them, either.
MellyLow 7 months ago
Politics makes me laugh
LaGenteBravaRp 8 months ago
This woman is a hero. It's a shame she didn't win.
TheBomb2012 9 months ago
The only thing missing from this interview is a damn laugh track, ...or the music from Benny Hill.
anaihilator 11 months ago 14
A special thanks to John McCain who injected this child killing terrorist into our lives. Asshole.
dannyd1572 1 year ago
POOR SARAH! Like Mother, like son: retards!! Like Mother, like daughter: sluts and cheap whores! Oh well, you can't have 'em all, bitches!! Hey, Gal, wipe that blood off your hands! But then: it probably won't come off!!
MarcusHolly 1 year ago
She needs to learn better posture. Her posture is hideous. I'm not saying everyone needs to have great posture, or that it's REQUIRED to be whatever. But I don't think it's unimportant. If you are ABLE to sit right, and you expect to be taken seriously and be perceived in a positive way in the kind of position that she's taken on... it's probably a good idea to have good posture, just like it's a good idea to know how to spell correctly, etc.
strangeaslife 1 year ago
she's hot-lookin. :)
Jtomo1987 1 year ago
Honestly, I don't like Palin at all, but how many American's really knew Bush's strategy by the term "Bush Doctorine". Come on...
NJPlayer79 1 year ago
@NJPlayer79 Not many, but most claim that they did. A real weakness exposed.
500millionamericans 1 year ago
i thought this was saturday night Live for a minute!LOL Wow this is real!
STONRUNNIT 1 year ago
This isn't just the Bush doctrine, it's how people behave and are legally allowed to behave. You don't have to wait until you're punched in the face to defend yourself. We as a nation don't have to wait until we're bombed to act in self-defence. That said, Iraq was no threat and our "pre-emptive strike" was not self-defence.
PissedFechtmeister 1 year ago
@nieten7642 um, i took AP US history a couple of years ago in 10th grade and i learned what the bush doctrine is. i dont want the leaders of this country not knowing the rationale bush came up with so that we'd go to war against iraq. she should have said then that she did not know what it was, and asked Charlie to explain what it was exactly and answered it then. Agree or not? she tried to pretend she knew wth she was saying. which is defined by many as "stumped"
QaFeRo 1 year ago
@QaFeRo, Please direct me to the Bush Doctrine, what document in Congress is it?
ClassicFIHD 1 year ago
that's Obama's position.....
notabadguy06 1 year ago
What's wrong with saying, "I don't know?" People always look dumber when they don't know something and pretend like they do.
stinky472 1 year ago 2
@stinky472 its wrong when you're the next potentional fucking Vice President -_-
sooshzilla 1 year ago
@sooshzilla Yes but it gives a much worse impression when ones pretends to know it.
stinky472 1 year ago
lmao. I cant say i know exactly what the bush docterine is either (tho i know i should) But it's not my job to know it either. :P
lunaticseclipse 1 year ago
@lunaticseclipse It's not her job either to know what is a Media made-up document. Fact is that there is 5 versions of them and she got one of them.
ClassicFIHD 1 year ago
@ClassicFIHD Maybe not, but it is her RESPONSIBILITY as a potential government elected official to know. Look, anyone that picked up a newspaper, read an online news article or watched televised news knew what the Bush Doctrine is/was -- if you're trying to make your argument, why didn't she say something like, "I'm not following your question, can you explain?" SHE DIDN'T -- She tried to put it back on him like she was smarter than him. She's proven too many times that's she's just stupid.
CaribbeanLounger 1 year ago
@CaribbeanLounger "but it is her RESPONSIBILITY" BULL! What politician has a "RESPONSIBILITY" what crap a lies the media spews out? And again, there were 4 versions. Hell I would not even expect Obzoz the know what crap the media spits out. Sorry, but I prefer my leaders to know what's in the constitution and in REAL government documents. Even Obozo was wrong on constitutional issues and what about the pass Couric gave Biden on his FDR/stock market crash/ going on TV comment?
ClassicFIHD 1 year ago
@ClassicFIHD Are you seriously this fucking retarded or are you showing off for some toothless hooker that's doing meth in your trailer?! If you're so fucking stupid that you want to play the "5 versions" game, then you're fucking dumber than the caribou that A&E tranquilized to get 'hunted" by the fucktard Palin in her 'reality' show. Unfortunately, your fucking 'leaders' are regurgitated sound bytes that wouldn't know the fucking constitution, nor the hint of reality if it bit them in the ass.
CaribbeanLounger 1 year ago
@CaribbeanLounger Bhaw ha ha ha my fucking 'leaders' kicked your fucking 'leaders' asses two months ago. Bwah ha ha ha ha
ClassicFIHD 1 year ago
@CaribbeanLounger "why didn't she say something like, "I'm not following your question, can you explain" And she asked "I what respect Charlie" In fact she even gave a correct answer to one of the four media versions, just not the one Gibson has in mind.
ClassicFIHD 1 year ago
@ClassicFIHD Seriously/! I answered your fucking moronic question in my last post. Do the world or nation a favor and castrate yourself so you don't have the opportunity to impregnate the goat that lives in your basement the your mother fucked (after all, how do you think you were born) and have a kid. If it that child was anywhere near human (which is doubtful) they should practice stabbing themselves in the sack or vagina to keep them from spreading your fucktard seed. I hope you go slowly
CaribbeanLounger 1 year ago
Sarah had a chance here to earn some respect from me. It didn't matter as much to me that she didn't know what this media created term meant; what mattered is that she couldn't admit that she didn't know something, and tried to BS her way through the conversation to avoid looking stupid. If she had plead ignorance - "What doctrine are you talking about?" I would have had a lot more respect for her.
ProfessorLiljedahl 1 year ago 4
As far as her being confused, yeah she was, but as far as there actually being a Bush Doctrine, NO there wasn't an actual doctrine it's a phrase that was coined by the media. Get over your stupid liberal self.
tcon26 1 year ago
@tcon26 and also the question was extrememly vague so i would have been like clarify on what you are asking me. Period. Half you idiots wouldn't have know where to start either.
tcon26 1 year ago
fuck palin shes fuckin stupid as fuck if i ever see her in person shes dead
SleazenTeaze 1 year ago
Lol the classic ''In what respect'' when you don't know how to answer a question XD
ReviewAfterDark 1 year ago
It is actually a very useful response. Sometimes questions are phrased ambiguously and sometimes you don't hear or catch what exactly the person is asking and misunderstand it.
Her problem was that it was a vague question about something that didn't really exist outside the nomenclature of the media think-tanks.
She was unprepared for dealing with vague questions.
AtlantiansAnAlteran 1 year ago
And she would be the worse right after him if she ever gets elected.
Actually there was a Bush doctrine, get a book do research damn (attack countries preemptively and such...)
xdeliriumx1 2 years ago
As much as i HATE her i feel bad for her she must be embaraced rly they made it up or was clearly confused i watched mcain say it but it might hav been made up cuz WHO CARES WHAT BUSH SAYS HE IS THE WORST PRESIDENT THIS COUNTRY HAS HAD (sorry to go off)
stephyandizzybff4eve 2 years ago
You feel bad for her because you think she is confused, yet you type like that?!
AtlantiansAnAlteran 1 year ago
@AtlantiansAnAlteran if u knew me you would expect anything lol (i hate her yes but if i was her i would b running away frm thr lol)
stephyandizzybff4eve 1 year ago
LOL she messed up even i knew what that meant and im 13
Sarah: "hello you saw me on tv you want an autograph"
Me:comes closer and starts to chocke her
Sarah:"what are you doing"
Me:takes out a knife and stabs her to death
If u wana know y i would kill her go to my channel
stephyandizzybff4eve 2 years ago
Comment removed
GodLovesMcCain 2 years ago
Yes, liberteeen is correct. However, if you want a more formal definition, why don't you ask John McCain. He talked about it in the 2005 documentary "why we fight." So I'm pretty sure her running mate knew what it was. Just watch the video in my message to lees20022.
JohnEdwardIAF 2 years ago
There was no such thing as "the Bush doctrine". It was an uneducated and stupid question.
It would be akin to asking someone: "Do you agree with the Wilson Doctrine?"
When referring to the 14 points or something like that.
AtlantiansAnAlteran 2 years ago
@AtlantiansAnAlteran
he said "the bush doctrine, annunciated in september, 2002, before the iraq war."
thats pretty specific.
BeLiketheSquerrl 1 year ago
There was no Bush Doctrine Annunciation in September 2002.
There was never any official 'Bush Doctrine'.
That is the problem with the question.
AtlantiansAnAlteran 1 year ago
@AtlantiansAnAlteran
the word doctrine is defined as a set of rules or beliefs.
In september 2002 the bush administrations "National Security Strategy of the United States" was published which is the basis for what people refer to as "the bush doctrine"
an educated politician should be able to piece this together, let alone one that is running for vice president of the united states.
BeLiketheSquerrl 1 year ago
My point is simply this: The interviewer should have stated what 'the Bush doctrine" was and asked her view. He should have done that, rather than state the name that was given to it by the media.
AtlantiansAnAlteran 1 year ago
The "doctines" are something the media claims from speeches they feel are important.
Palin was right to ask him to clearify.
She then goes on to address the most recent "doctrine" dubbed by the media.
lol
So anyone that thought she got this wrong is the IDIOT including Gibson
lees20022 2 years ago
@lees20022
Made up by the media? LOL, Why don't you watch:
" MCCAIN ON THE BUSH DOCTRINE"
where John McCain discusses the Bush doctrine in a 2005 documentary called "Why we Fight." He clearly states "Bush Doctrine."
This isn't just for lees20022. All you Republican dogs go and watch John McCain talk about the "BUSH DOCTRINE."
lmao, don't panic you guys. Just hurry and think of something. Entertain me with another desperate excuse. I can't wait!
: )
JohnEdwardIAF 2 years ago 2
it's easy, the Bush doctrine was
'you can do whatever you want and there are no consequences'
liberteeen 2 years ago 23
@liberteeen sure sounds like a liberal if I ever heard one. I sure wonder what you think about Obama doing whatever HE wants without congress' approval. Bush would have been impeached in an instant if he tried to pull Obama's stunt in Libya.
bigboydrz 9 months ago
what a con artist!
littlealpay 2 years ago
hahahaha
im 14 and i dont know what the bush doctorine is
but a vp candidate should
chrisluvas 2 years ago 5
It's scary that the regular voter didn't know what the Bush Doctrine was, let alone the Vice Presidential candidate. fuck.
BloodyHomeBrew 2 years ago 2
Oh and Charlie, what do you think about Acorn..... oh, I don't know what you are talking about. Gibson is so uninformed. And you have it right about the Obama doctrine --- supporting his buddies, the socialist dictators. Very sad and scary.
hershann13 2 years ago
Hey Charlie,
Your Bush Doctrine is America's Doctrine. We have always had the right to self defense. Without it we don't have an America.
So Charlie go soak your head.
LoungeLizardLouie 2 years ago
in what respect, charlie?
markmccormick 2 years ago 3
so you bunch of rocket scientists --- what is the Obama doctrine?
hershann13 2 years ago
Again, you would have to specify which one you are talking about. Snubbing our allies, conceding to our enemies, or supporting fledgling socialist dictatorships.
500millionamericans 2 years ago
LMAO! I love how she press her knuckles like Knuckles Echidna ("Rad Red") from that Sonic cartoon!
"In what respect Charlie?" She's probably thinking he's the same Charlie from the Charlie's Angels; errrr!
roch202020 2 years ago 2
Heh. I like McCain, but give me a break. I'm sure she is a nice lady, but the only thing she is qualified for is a managerial position at the local Denny's.
YanesAlexander 2 years ago 2
-shudders-
No but seriously, Im not even in the US and I know what the Bush doscrine is.
Euch, Sarah Palin.
Serioslump 2 years ago
this is hilarious
this is who ppl want to run America?
she is trying to do a john edwards on the bush doctrine and feel around until she gets close and still failed. what a dumb lady hahahaha idiot!!!!
oledirtybrien 2 years ago
You're right that Palin was trying to feel her way around until she could guess what Gibson was talking about, and that she looked stupid doing so. The problem is that there are four definitions of "Bush Doctrine," and Gibson only knew 3, so he cited the 3rd one. He had to make himself look stupid to make Palin look stupid(which is pretty pathetic) and, in doing so, he made most of America look stupid by pretending that they knew he was talking about the 3rd definition before he defined it.
500millionamericans 2 years ago
Thank you for the nice comment
that was nice of you
oledirtybrien 2 years ago
then why didn't she say that.... because she didn't even know one of them.
moejoe04 2 years ago
You missed my point entirely mojo. What is the purpose of using language that is only used by current political science students and political pundits? He knew that nobody would use this language because its use requires definition. He even confused himself in the process! And they couldn't find a way to trick the genius Joe Biden?
This country deserves what it is going to get. Its lesson time. Just look at your fearless leader's organization ACORN. Own it bitch, its yours!
500millionamericans 2 years ago
I'm 20 years old and I knew what the Bush Doctrine was. Most people with half a political brain do. The fact of the matter is that she couldn't even give a response that was remotely relevant to ANY of the definitions. And look at you cry, boo hoo hoo, waahh, Joe Biden never got tricked!!! wahh wahh wahh, you wanna know why? Because Joe Biden knows what the BUSH DOCTRINE is... because he's not an idiot. How can you defend such idiocy? Change the subject there too, hahahaha, you are laughable
moejoe04 2 years ago
So you believe that anyone who doesn't know what the Bush Doctrine is must be an idiot? I run into idiots every day. Doctors, lawyers, CPAs, you name it! The higher the education level, the more likely I am to quiz them on the Bush Doctrine. It's my own little study. Boy are they stupid! They don't know what the Bush Doctrine is. Nothing is more important than the lingo of political pundits. Now say 10 Charles Krauthammers, 40 Charlie Gibsons, and go fuck yourself!
500millionamericans 2 years ago
@500millionamericans -
You are exactly right. This is exactly what Gibson did. The "Bush Doctrine" is a fairly meaningless term and is subjective on many levels.
Actually, Palin asking "In what respect, Charlie?" was a perfectly appropriate response. Gibson asking "Well... what do YOU think it means?" was a "gotcha journalism" move. He was trying to set her up to fail, not get an informative answer out of her.
nieten7642 2 years ago
On the contrary, the "Bush Doctrine" is not subjective at all. It is basically, "preemptive action instead of action". And while it is true that it is rather general, this lack of specification from Gibson gave Palin the opportunity to give her opinion to all aspects of it.
And I seriously believe that any politician aspiring to be the United States VP should at least know the United States' foreign policies.
QaFeRo 2 years ago
Furthermore, while i believe that Gibson did quite deliberately bait Palin, I believe that it was "a perfectly appropriate response" on his part. I mean, he didn't want her to fail. Why?? He only wanted to make sure that Palin actually knew about US foreign policy, to test her knowledge about the country she wants to lead, because it seemed that the moment he asked that question she was stumped.
QaFeRo 2 years ago
@QaFeRo - Yes, he absolutely did try to bait her. At least we can agree on that point. And yes, he did want her to fail. He and most of the rest of the media rarely ask Obama "baiting" questions like this.
Her answer was perfectly appropriate for the reasons I laid out earlier. Not knowing exactly what a liberal is referring to when they say "Bush Doctrine" is hardly being stumped.
nieten7642 2 years ago
@QaFeRo... actually, you are wrong. "Bush Doctrine" means a lot of different things to a lot of different people. It is a term used mostly by those who didn't/don't agree with many of George W. Bush's foreign relation policies... thus the reason for Palin not being as intimately familiar with the liberal "code" (term) as Gibson was. It is a concept that is made of of an amalgamation of various specific foreign policies that Bush's opposition uses to lump all of them together. It is a fluid term.
nieten7642 2 years ago
Also her "interpretation" of the BD, disregarding the fact that the doctrine as a whole was quite clear and left no room for mindless interpretation by mindless airheads, was quite vague. After Gibson helped her out by giving her a timeframe ("September 2002, before the Iraq war"), she was able to bullshit this response about terrorism and muslim extremists. And while the BD is about that, her response gave no indication that she actually knew, much less understood the gist of it.
QaFeRo 2 years ago
I admit that this is funny, but the funniest part is that most of the people laughing still don't know what the "Bush Doctrine" is.
500millionamericans 2 years ago
Which version? After all there are 4 versions.
ClassicFIHD 2 years ago
Speak for yourself. I know it.
sabbirsa 2 years ago
Then you must agree that asking this question made Charlie Gibson look like a bigger moron than Sarah Palin.
500millionamericans 2 years ago
not at all b/c the lady is running for vice president and naturally it is expected that she knows her stuff inside out.
sabbirsa 2 years ago
Well, he's the one asking the question, so he should be familiar with the terminology that he is using. Unfortunately, he's using bullshit political pundit speak that has no meaning to most people.
500millionamericans 2 years ago
You think Charlie Gibson didn't know what the bush doctrine was before he asked Sarah? he just wanted to see if her molly hobby ass knew
she's dumb! and ppl like you will defend her idiotic exploits til the death. So sad she quit at being the governor of alaska yet you think she can run the whole shebang??? I see through you
oledirtybrien 2 years ago
zoopolitikos.wordpress. com (without space before com)
for an honest look at American politics
getupjumpy 2 years ago
To think she could have been a heartbeat away from running this country is mortifying. To think hardcore Republicans still support her. Hannity, Limbaugh, Rove, O'Reilly and Dick Morris all just gush whenever her name is mentioned and fall in line to support her. What is wrong with this party? Seriously?
dannyd1572 2 years ago 3
What's wrong with this party? Yes, how terrible it is that Palin is rejecting so much of Obama's stimulus money with those strict building codes. It's terrible that Palin wouldn't want to contribute to our nation's deficit! It's also horrible that the Republicans have been voting against the big bailouts of large corporations. What's wrong with them? It's time the Republicans stood on some principles.
zeecee1 2 years ago
LOL yeah I'm sure the Republicans have absolutely NO principles hahaha
Professorben112 2 years ago
i love how her attitude is like "you're wording this wrong. this is your fault that i don't understand" xD
broadwaymelody33 2 years ago 3
I LMAO every time I see this lol
mapboy78 2 years ago
You know I read daily both local and international papers online and this question would have stumped me. I would have said a doctrine for what? now if he had asked what do you think about Bush's idea of foreign policy. I'd be able to answer. he was being kind of a dick about it.
Smokeyg1972 2 years ago
Well, most of the other candidates were quizzed on the Bush Doctrine during the primaries, but oh well.
Also, even after Gibson stated "the NSC 2002," Palin still was drawing a blank.
qwertyman129 2 years ago 2
Fair enough that you might not recognize the specific term 'Bush Doctrine'. The only problem is that you (to the best of my knowledge) have never been in the position of almost becoming the Vice President of the United States. She should have known this. The problem with saying "well I didn't know this, so it's okay if she doesn't" is that we should want our leaders to be more informed, and better equipped to make decisions.
DCG1018 2 years ago
Do you notice that she's using name repitition to garner favor?
"Charlie.... Charlie..."
Thank God McCain didn't get to the whitehouse or we'd be in some serious shit right now.
ezra2662 2 years ago 18
You Betcha' ;)
welhungjohnson 2 years ago 3
Yep; I'm in Japan right now, and if McCain and Palin had won, I would've ran off to Tokyo and pleaded for asylum. Palin's a total MILF, but I don't want her to be in a position where she's running my country!
R8erNation636 2 years ago
@ezra2662 You are ignorant XD We already are in serious shit OBAMA= One Bad Ass Mistake America plus we always will be in serious shit US is 12 trillion dollars in debt to the rest of the world as we speak its growing.
klayman2 1 year ago
@ezra2662 that's actually a strategy
rebelsouljaz 1 year ago
@ezra2662
McCain and Obama were both morons. Look what Obama has done to this country right now.
LogicalFlawDetector 7 months ago
i don't know if i can watch this one. far too cringe worthy....
oh go on then..
EFFING HELL???!
consuelala 2 years ago
Even an untrained monkey could have given a smarter response than Palin. She had an open playing field, in that she could have stated her own interpretation of what the Bush doctrine is, then given a prefab answer.
"In what respect Charlie?" Such a fool. She actually thought she could trick him into telling her.
What he should have said is, "I don't know what you just said, Charlie. What does that word, "doctrine" mean, Charrrrlie?"
clayschamp 2 years ago
they sit so close, no leg room XD
trinidad1992 2 years ago
This is hilarious... The way she tries to talk her way around the question because she doesn't want to admit she's got no clue... awesome
nitnatsnoc 3 years ago 2
I'm not sure if the uploader even knows how to respond to being questioned about 'the Bush Doctine,' a phrase that has multiple meanings.
Give her a break. She asked a fair question.
Professorben112 3 years ago
How can you try to defend this imbecile? If you're going to be running for one of the highest powered spots in the United States Government. It is NEEDED THAT YOU KNOW POLICIES SUCH AS THIS. This is an absolute disgrace.
IHaveAMask 3 years ago 2
The Bush doctrine is...jeepers is everyone mad at me for being a fucking idiot?
Whistlejocket 3 years ago 3
haha, she had no idea what it was
reduserisk 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Caroline Kennedy looks like a genius compared to Palin; but, so does burnt toast.
President-elect Obama just called on Congress to pass his new economic recovery plan. It's an ambitious program to save or create 3 million jobs while investing in health care, clean energy & green jobs.
Yet, the right wing is prepared to fight against him with everything they've got. They don't want to pay for key provisions like health care for kids & laid-off workers. They only want MORE tax cuts for the rich.
mavrek47 3 years ago
The right's economic plan is to massively cut taxes on all segments of society, particularly on buisness. The left's economic plan is to create a long term partisan socialist state. Clearly, the right is stimulating jobs more. So no. Palin would have been better than the weak willed Obama, who can't control his senate or congress.
And incidentally, she got the meaning of the Bush doctrine right. It is about spreading democracy to Islamic states. Bush changed it when they found no wmd.
Ytaker 3 years ago
When I think of the word "doctrine", I don't think of someone's world view....
ProoFzorz 3 years ago
hey guys, if u had to describe america as any livivng creature, wat would it be ? i think, a massive dinasaur, really big and powerfull, but with a tiny brain. O wait, sorry, most ppl in America, perticularly the bible belt, dont believe in dinasours...hahahaha, NO am joking i'm very pro american in many ways, its just a shame that the Intelectuals are confined to scientific advancements while the stupidest people seem to be leading this awsome country. peace
bullshitohen1 3 years ago
Your right but if theres as hot as Palin who gives a care who runs our country lol
MrJones0207 3 years ago
How does this video prove she doesn't know what the Bush doctrine is? According to wikipedia, there is at least 3 parts to it. Gibson assumes she doesn't know and explains it after she offers a legitimate answer.
ryratt 3 years ago
does the Bush Doctrine apply if it is the citizens of the United States vs. the US Government? "hit them before they hit us." ...or would the citizens be criminals for such an act? I'll have to research that.
sumdumfoo1 3 years ago
Christian extremists don't blow themselves up, they just send the poor to do their dirty work.
ifc6969 3 years ago
..... hat das Christentum nichts mit dem zu tun, was diese Leute treiben.
Schlimm ist alleine, daß so wenige wirkliche Christen ihnen ihre Lügen nachzuweisen versuchen
Sirengesang 3 years ago
I completely agree with you. There is nothing Christian about these people.
ifc6969 3 years ago 3
The Bush Doctrine isn't a simple one-point issue Charlie. Protecting our country from Islamic-extremists and terrorism is the the reason the Bush Doctrine was made in the first place Charlie! I was simply asking you what fucking section of the Bush Doctrine you were referring CHARLIE! - That's how she should of responded to Charlie, and the left-wing Obama worshipers.
Deminion619 3 years ago
HA, HA , HA....
This is so funny.
klaotha 3 years ago
thank god obama won.
MagnetMan21 3 years ago
Sarah Palin will forever be known for this clip LOL
mapboy78 3 years ago
HOW DID SHE EVEN BECOME A GOVERNER?!
nickelbatx 3 years ago
rid the world of "islamic extremism" - nothing about any other religion though, nothing on christian extremism, but of course that would mean ridding the world of her...
joshuaspencerclaxton 3 years ago
joshuaspencerclaxton,
The reason you don't hear about christian extremism is because christians don't believe we should blow ourselves to pieces in the name of our God (or Allah). And the far left has made it clear that they hate Christians already...
Deminion619 3 years ago
christianity should be despised just like any other religion. These evangelical neocons are killing this country
andron333 3 years ago
Why would you hate somebody because of what they believe in? That is one of the most absurd things I've heard of.
daniellerenee1988 3 years ago 3
daniellerenee1988
Thats true you shouldn't HATE somebody because of what they believe in. but should you be able to make fun of their "stupidity"? yes i think so.
come on now people..religion? what a joke. I mean sure it may be true. but who knows? just like some people believe there are aliens. why? because we have a couple videos of unexplainable objects in the sky. So if i said i wear tin foil hats to keep the aliens out of my brain theres no reason to question my sanity?
noodles297 3 years ago
No,you still shouldn't be able to make fun of their "stupidity".Unless you are a professional in whatever they are stating...who are you to judge?I don't judge somebody because they don't believe in God.I don't judge somebody because they do or don't believe in aliens.That's not my job.
daniellerenee1988 3 years ago
why can't i judge them? i can do whatever i want. as long as i'm not hurting them or hurting their "feelings". it may be wrong to completely write someone off or make judgements about them that aren't relevant to the subject. But besides that why not? they don't have to listen. and i say stupidity loosely i didn't mean they are stupid people. But from my view they are ACTING stupid in their beliefs. But no i'd never hate someone because of their beliefs.
noodles297 3 years ago
Christian Extremism comes from someone sending a Plane with a smart bomb.
randomusernamemygod 3 years ago
thank god obama won thats all i gotta say
i think mccain wouldnt have been a bad pres but i love obama.. and have serious issues with palin
mOoMoO5987 3 years ago
exactly!
demps911 3 years ago
when he talks of a bush doctrine, his "version of it" as he stated after palin, was more general than what would be the much more detailed doctrine of the bush administration.
she was right in asking in what respect.
I dont see how this video discredits her intelligence.
his idea of the bush doctrine relating to the iraq war is again also still too general in that respect.
so, it's no wonder that he wasn't satisfied with palin's response.
too bad most viewers don't understand that.
Discosurfer 3 years ago
No, he specifically refers to 2002 - this is when the pre-emptive policy was declared. You'd think the future Vice-president would know something about that.
mrphantomb 3 years ago 2
this woman is so stupid and uneducated, it's a shame that she is even allowed to be in politics...
sirenitaurbana 3 years ago
YEAH JUST LIKE THE THREAT POSED by those "IRAQI"
WMD's.. Just ask any soldier in IRAQ he or she can tell you of the PILES OF THESE WMD's they keep "finding"..
communistjesus 3 years ago
And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman,young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword. 24 And they burnt the city with fire, and all that was therin : only the silver, and the Gold, and the vessels of brass, they put into the treasury .. And the Lord said unto Joshua ...And thou shalt do to Ai and her king as thou didst unto Jericho !!!Vote Sarah Palin 2008 !!She has a Task from God !
ShalloeThought 3 years ago
The bush doctrine is one of the most dangerous policies I've ever heard. That means they can attack ANYONE, for no reason, and justify it through propaganda and lies. I mean, fuck, no one is safe if Palin and McCain get into the white house. The idea of preemptive strike plays on American's fear post-911 and would allow war criminals free reign to commit all the murder they want. Fucking insane Orwellian doctrine.
Sei1863 3 years ago
This woman needs no help making herself look like A FUCKING MORON.
estherguas 3 years ago
I want to hear YOU explain the Bush Doctrine. It is very complicated, which is why she asked a clarification question. It is highly insulting as a woman to listen to people rip her intelligence apart. If she were ugly or a man, we would not be subjected to most of this "news." She is an elected official; have some respect.
yurmom812 3 years ago
not the first time she's not understood or answered a question. he didn't ask her to explain the doctrine, he asked her if she agrees with it, and she didn't know what it was... at all, not one bit. yes, it may be complicated, but as someone running for VP, ya should know what it is! this clearly shows her ignorance when it comes to foreign affiars. she may not be a total dumbass BUT she isn't intelligent enough to be VP or god forbid our president one day. she doesn't even know the VP's job.
hugnkiss6676 3 years ago
Oh my god, at the end she still didn't even know after the interviewer explained it to her! lol "If a strike against america is imminent" - it was above pre-emptive strikes against other countries, not countries striking america. lol Dumbass, how can ANYONE take her seriously.
jones89eddead327 3 years ago
I mean "about" not above...typo.
jones89eddead327 3 years ago
She didn't know what the Bush Doctrine is! No one can refute--this is proof. She didn't even know what it is! That's not misspeaking--that is gross ignorance if you're trying to be the freakin' Vice Prez
pushover1 3 years ago
S T is a pretty good comedian. He had you guys going there.
tonykonig 3 years ago
Shalloe, are u kidding me?
no seriously? are u kidding me?
prthecrazyone 3 years ago
President Bush has been challunged much over the last years by the enumies of Jesus and has triumphed dispite the odss!! He has prepaird the soil for Sarah to plant the seeds of Jesus !!! A vote for Sara is a vote for Jesus !! Halleluia !!!
ShalloeThought 3 years ago
and to think you can vote...
I'm just happy my vote cancels out yours...
beneaththeabove 3 years ago
Sarah Palin is an Angel sent by God to lift the Spirit of Witchcraft from America.. she will bring the glory of God into every aspect of American Life from our childrens schools, to the supreme Court and the White House !!! No more "Scientific" nonsense about "Evolution" and "Global Warming " taught to our Children !!! No more dirty books in Public Libraries to poisen our childrens minds !!!! Halleluia !! May the fire of Jesus cleanse America of Evil !!!
ShalloeThought 3 years ago
your fucking nuts!
obeygiant10 3 years ago
r u 4 real or r u kidding?
kannddyy17 3 years ago
Hahaha very convincing! You had me going there! "The spirit of witchcraft"... very cute, that's exactly how those medieval douchebags think! I love irony on youtube.
Sei1863 3 years ago
Bravo, to a highly intelligent, very moral woman! Shame on those who bash her, except oh yeah they support a candidate who promises "CHANGE". Pretty scared of what that change might be. McCain/ Palin, standing up for our safety and our freedoms. But I guess we're supposed to opposed to that. This chic is for honor and patriotism and McCain/Palin have both!
mstngmis 3 years ago
Sarah doesent know her Bush needs Doctrine .. She thought those rashes and discharges were all just part of becoming a Woman.
ShalloeThought 3 years ago
Spoken with such intelligence and class! Please, spare us this ridiculous garbage your spewing next time you think about commenting. Screen name suits you!
mstngmis 3 years ago
Sarah Palin gave a correct definition of the Bush Doctrine! She said President Bush is trying to rid the world of Islamic extremists who support terrorism. This is the policy statement Bush made after the 9/11 attacks. "From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime." Look it up on wikipedia for yourself! Palin was clearly refering to the 2001 definition of the Bush doctrine.
Charles802 3 years ago
Look it up on Wikipedia? are you kidding me?! Try using a credible source next time. We dont have enough time in the world to explain what the question meant to either you or Palin.
Susy2240 3 years ago
There is NO SINGLE DEFINITION for the Bush Doctrine! The definition Charlie Gibson gave has been superseeded. Too bad Charlie didn't do his homework. There have been four very different versions of the Bush Doctrine articulated over the years, as Charles Krauthammer correctly noted. Charlie should have been straightforward and just asked her what she though of using pre-emptive force. Not only did Gibson come across as snooty, but Gibson didn't even get the definition right!
Charles802 3 years ago 2
Palins Bush needs Doctrine..Thats what happens when you dont believe in condom use !!!
ShalloeThought 3 years ago
Booya!
jankendorf 3 years ago
shes good at trying to dodge shotgun bullets hahahahaha.... but she needs to wear a vest... hahaha
asianmelb 3 years ago
Swing and a miss
mahavishnu009 3 years ago
i love her.
doughmayne 3 years ago
all i can say is wow......
Palin fails
lightningfastdragon 3 years ago
I am going to miss this when this election is over. Her idiotic responses are so entertaining. It is like putting my mom out of the kitchen and BAM! you are running for the VP.
totpckg 3 years ago
Notice she winks everytime she responds to a question that she knows nothing about. I love body langauge!
bdbak47 3 years ago
McCain is old, he'd die and she will be the president hahahahaha
pmorc1 3 years ago
Oh, dear God!!! Somehow, I feel bad for this poor, silly woman ... she's made a total fool of herself
Macskafogo 3 years ago