@liamriordan Yes - Northrop experimaented with this design on the F-5 aitframe (as the X-29). The inherant instability was what gave the aircraft it's lightning quick performance but required massive computing power to allow the pilot to maintain control.
@ascendead1 No they can't! Because they believe they are the best and anyone who doesn't agree them (Including Russia , Iran ,etc.) is terrorist! Don't expect them to be polite(of course lots of them are good guys)
"If it looks right, it'll fly right". An old saying that preceded fly by wire. I'm sure this a/c is technically very good, but it just doesn't look right.
@ironian Based on...not copied, russians put their own very Different spin on everything, so do we, look at the M60, based on the MG-42, but looks and performs nothing like it
China is the coveted Russia military technology. Available they should be! That way, China to develop more high-tech? Of these, outrun Russia no doubt. It's from China more than Russia at the same time absorbing Western technology.
Su-35BM - Russia: The 30 year old Su-27 airframe is still going strong with its great maneuverability, durability ,and adaptability. It also has great BVR capability but not on par with western designs like the F-22, Eurofighter, and Rafale. It has the largest RCS in this category making it highly visible to radars.
@HarryMuffUk Imbeicle this is pure Russian airplane.... wtf is F22?? 100 million dollar shit can. There is nothing even remotely close to Su47 in US inventory. Plus MiG1.44 and Su47 were here lOOOOONG before F22 ever existed, so if anything F22 designers copied SU47 berkut.
@Ouija121085 Thanks for playing dipshit. Now go and Google Grumman X29 and check the date of the first flight... 1984! They got bored with it a long time ago but the Russians just can't stop copying American designs.
@HarryMuffUk bahahahha ure a brit ahahah what has your country made in the past 50 years except a double decker bus? fuck you russian aero-space engineering is the world class everyone knows that even americans. While for your political propaganda bullshit go watch more hollywood movies maybe you come with some original comedy...
@HarryMuffUk and for x29 cowboys could not make it work thats why they ditched it was too complicated.... plus they couldnt even make a jump-jet on F35 which they bought plans from YAK141. So really everyone knows that russian fighter jets/bombers are best in the world.
You see, Americans played with that technology long long time ago. They realized something though, if the flight computer fails, the inherently unstable airplane will rip apart in air.
Secondly, who the fuck needs ever more maneuverable airplanes 50-60 years AFTER the WW II?????
Russian engineers are playing too many dog fight video games.
@napornik Ok you're exaggerating it a bit. It won't rip apart, would it? It'll just become hyper hard too fly maybe, which leads us to the next feature: The Ejectable Seat. Marvelous invention allowing you to go sightseeing with your parachute whilst 'your' multi-million dollar plane flies straight (or maybe not-so-straight with that unstable plane) into a mountain. Also, maneuverability does comes in handy while evading missiles, too. Not just in dog fights ;)
@napornik It doesn't rip apart because it's unstable, it falls out of the sky because it's unstabel. And they make important systems like that overly redundant in case something goes wrong.
@HarryMuffUk this prototype was from 1970's shit head. If it werent for captured nazis you would stil lbe flying byplanes so shut the fuck up. u Stole everythin of nazis.
the only poeple still fighting america vs russia is my grandpa. Were on opposite sides of the world and unless Russia tries to turn the middle east into west russia then i dont see a problem worth fighting over. Look at me my country has a cool airplane that i had no part in creating. Get 5 of each ready to go with remote controls to a fighter sim and have the world best pilots duke it out over the skies of Canada
The average American couldn't give 2 shits about Russia...they probably couldn't even show it to you on a map. Not to mention they believe our American military is far superior by several decades to anyone else and want to dismantle it. Russia is a has been nation that is full thyroid cancer from Chernobyl and is a hodge podge of disorganized races. The average age of a man in Russia is 59 in America...76. How does it feel to know you will be dead before 60?
@CrniGuja A wee bit better than having an ex-spook who is no longer president and wants to turn it back into a totalitarian form of government make all the decisions... ;-]
@cchanderson " Russia is a has been nation that is full thyroid cancer from Chernobyl " ??? Do you even know where Chernobyl is? What kind of ignorant comment is this anyway? Please tell me that you aren't one who thinks that the Soviet Union was Russia... What most Americans don't realize about Russia is that they are extremely tough and resilliant people and can withstand almost anything thrown at them. They are doing just fine by themselves. They need no one to survive just fine.
@TonyN737 Yes it is, but how do you know? I hihgly doubt that neither the American or Russian government give out all the details regarding their respective militaries.
@LiebeFurVolk *Forward Swept Wings* are supposed to increase maneuverability. The Germans came up with the idea before WW2. The US tested the idea in the 80s with the X-29 but it never became an fighter. But we DID keep the idea of *Thrust Vectoring Nozzles* from the X-29, you can see a different version of them on the F-22. TVNs are better than FSWs (and also *Forward Wing Canards* (which reflect way too much radar).
I've seen quite a few videos of this aircraft, but I've never seen it do anything amazing. I know the forward swept wing concept in itself is an amazing feat, but this aircraft can do nothing more than most single engine aircraft. That's why it was so short lived. I think this aircraft was built for moral purposes more so than anything else. The composites used on the space shuttle were far more advanced the ones used on this aircraft. I just don't see the point. Nice to look at though.
I invented this wing modell when I was 6 years old. I assembled plastic aircraft models and cemented the wings backwards. My older brother called me an idiot. But was I really....?
@SirRetku no... your brother is an idiot. Berkut has superior handleing then any fighter in the world due to the inverted wings which allows it to manuver and cut thru the air more efficiently then conventional wing.
Russians, you are the best, stop talking, show it baby, let me se what Americans have, fuck all, if there are not israelis to hel them , they will stll use pistol, John Wayn even now. Bravo Russians, I love you all
fucking russian liars. they say this wing is unique and only russians have it now. while i have a book that's nearly 30 years old where it depicts an american plane with the same wing. russians are good for nothing.
SU-47 is one of the coolest looking planes to fly. Sadly it has all those stabilizers and odd shaped wings because it can barely stay in the air itself. Still looks cool when it fly's! @Aminodaff China can kick NATOs ass if America let it. Dont forget China just recently started publicly showing its stealth fighter over 10 years after America publicly showed it.
Before I was filled with the perspective of both of the Communist and American side of both countries I have always like the Sukoih 47. But the F-22 Raptor is the best for now.
@tetramoo So as Sham pin is for the design team of F-35, makers of the aircraft which would be least in cost & is now a white elephant for the U.S government..............
It's my understanding that the design is actually inherently unstable, according to both pilots and engineers, and that the added maneuverability is offset by this. The only reason it's flyable is because of computer aided control, or as most of you probably already know, what is also known as "fly by wire". Of course I can't think of one modern jet that doesn't have that kind of system.
@stacryl You do realize that the raptor is faster, far more agile, and slightly less stealth... right? Not to mention it's payload is 30% larger and more fuel efficient. (when at same weight)
The raptor is in an entirely different class of aircraft. It can also be piloted remotely. This means the maneuvers it could use without a person inside would destroy a su 47.
I know as an American we are at odds with Russia, but as in chess you have to respect your adversary, and you can't get cocky lest you lose. Their aircraft are pretty awesome.
@Indy1489 I think they're more practical which is better than awesome, one of these days someone will make jammers good enough to make radar useless anyways to making aircraft stealthy by their physical design to me is pointless. Speed and mobility will be the future maybe not the near future but will be the future none the less.
@DaiwaYamato88 yep, agility. before thrust vectoring was invented, this was the clearest path to better maneuverability - problem is they're highly unstable, moreso if they sustain damage to the wing, and given its meant to be a combat plane, its generally passed over for a more combat capable design.
@DaiwaYamato88 I think it helps in reducing power on high speeds - the plane is using less cerozine. But I cant be sure in that, I am not quite an avionics expert. :D
the best looking fighter jet i have ever seen.. this ones my favorite!! would love to see it as a primary fighter .. it also looks unique too.. thumbs up and nice job russia! from a Canadian Sri Lankan!
@jospehporta well i agree wid u abt da 4ward swept wing tech.. nasa nd da nazis did try it out.. bt they cudn't mk it operational cos of stabilitty issues nd also cos of the shearing force prblms.. bt these russians did it,, as far as da steakth issue goes,, it indeed incorporates stealth.... it is built of composite materials meant to absorb nd deflect radar...
the su-47 'berkut' or golden eagle has been designed as a complete stealth plane... u can see that it does not have external hardpoints which suggests an internal weapons bay.. moreover, it is said that it also incorporates thrust vectoring technology and futuristic radar systems... if all these are true and if its radical forward swept wing design helps in superior maneuverability then.. maybe this is the Russian answer for the F-22 and the F-35 JSF....
@kairomama123 lol radical, NASA had a jet like this in the 1984, old tech and America did it first, well the Nazi's actually, but you get the point. Nothing stealth about it unless you think being painted black gives it stealth. Superior maneuverability doesn't do shit against advance AAM's, it'll be blown out of the sky as though it were standing still.
Russia makes nice planes but theyre equal to a F-15 or F-18..Also, Russia is still trying to play catch up to the U.S. in Avionics & stealth capabilities..
@marcus10 No the Russians are currently well behind in Avionics and stealth technology, I could give you the prove but if you reply bring yours cause that will save me time.
@marcus10 no I never said "stealth tactics" I said "stealth technology" and "avionics" and so because they are a very important role to play both of these technology's like what happened in 1991 at the time the Iraq had the 4th largest army, had the most integrated areal defence system of the time, within 100 of the attack they lost there defence and capability to fight back in almost every way. now if that's not prove that stealth and "stealth tactics" work...
@TheMilitaryTactics Yes, but Russian airforce disconnected all "cells" of georgian airial defence which were made on NATO standards just few years ago.
@marcus10 yeah that is NATO standards not US standards or UK standards, also the SU-30MKI had equal ratio's to the F-15D (1:1) in red flag, and the Russians were saying that it was twice as better before that.
@marcus10 Yes they were not but red flag is a routine training week for a simulated war in the USA India put money in one year and sent there people there to be trained in more detail.
@TheMilitaryTactics War simulation made by US army? And you take that for correct force value... Please, those things are made only for propaganda activities (for all those simulations which results were showed to public).
@marcus10 it was not just them the US it is based in the US, in fact it is US, UK, France, India, Germany, Turkey, and allot lot more that do use it and have an equal opinion on what is trained to the pilots at the different simulation's conducted to be as realistic of meeting enemy planes as can be.
@marcus10 well the list countrys that have gone are US, UK, France, Germany,Japan,Italy,Canada,Australia,South Korea,Spain,India,Brazil, Netherlands,Belgium,Sweden,Denmark,Norway,Portugal,Greece,New Zealand,Singapore,Chile,Israel,Turkey,Saudia Arabia,United Arab Emirates, Venezuela, and Pakistan. so yeah about half are in NATO and that isn't to surprising as it's a military treaty, and it's not like what comes out of Russia and China are going to be more neutral.
@TheMilitaryTactics I didnt said that what comes from Russia and China would be more neutral, it is same propaganda bulls**t. I spoked about events in reality which are only one which could be called on.
I prefer US aviation from the tech and battle proven performance, but the Russians make such sexy airplanes, and their powerplants have a very high rep amongst the aviation community for their raw power
"One of best Aircraft in the world, Right next to Su-37 and Mig-35" well thats where your wrong, what about the american f-22, or are you to ignorant to know about it?
@TheDoctorV2point0 you must be fucking stupid, the f-22 raptor can out maneuver the su-47 any day! proven fact dumb ass! next time do ur research before you run your fucking mouth
@RacersMoment stupid fuck, i obviously wasnt talking about that. i meant it as in, because they dont mention the f22, you call them ignorant. asshole.
@RacersMoment su37 and mig 35 are very good planes, you simply think that because the f22 is better it makes them not worth a shit. they arent ignorant, by your standards they might as well go back and name off every fukin plane that was good for its time. which makes you a dumbass.
@RacersMoment holy shit you are retarded. first you call them ignorant for not naming an american plane, then you call me ignorant for calling you ignorant BECAUSE YOU ARE IGNORANT. get off the internet and read a fuking book.
all of you went on about the ak-47, i agree that is a good item, because it has few moving parts. A modern fighter aircraft, like a car has a lot of moving parts. If you can not get a simple car right during mass production do you really think you can get some hing as complex as a fighter right during mass production? No that is why Russian aircraft are near handmade, which makes maintenance and repair a nightmare. No interchangeability.
@normalais you ever been in a russian combat anything? most likley no, have you ever been in combat period my bet no. So how can you come up with that opinion?
he said she said shit? T.V or both? FYI Russian has not lost a War in Hundreds of years Ghangis Khan Mongolian hords ( almost but no) Napolian came close not close enough, The Turks Attomon empire Ran, WWI, Almost, WWII very close still beat there ass, Afgan we withdrew hopefully US will too so explain our shiity weaopns ienstien???
the fucking red are geting smart we gotta watch our backs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Kingcove1 3 weeks ago
Sorry I stand corrected - it wasn't Northrop it was Grumman. ;-)
15uzu 3 months ago
@liamriordan Yes - Northrop experimaented with this design on the F-5 aitframe (as the X-29). The inherant instability was what gave the aircraft it's lightning quick performance but required massive computing power to allow the pilot to maintain control.
15uzu 3 months ago
@ascendead1 No they can't! Because they believe they are the best and anyone who doesn't agree them (Including Russia , Iran ,etc.) is terrorist! Don't expect them to be polite(of course lots of them are good guys)
Rouhollah74 4 months ago
"If it looks right, it'll fly right". An old saying that preceded fly by wire. I'm sure this a/c is technically very good, but it just doesn't look right.
theclivesinclair 4 months ago
su 47, su 37, su 35,su 33 russian.
dassault rafale french.
euro typhoon european.
f 22 raptor,f 35 american.
Now the world's best.
david87758 4 months ago
THE BEST !!!!!!!!
Mega05121981 5 months ago
Comment removed
Dreadnought942 5 months ago
If I had to choose between SU-47 and F-22 to fly for free I'd choose SU-47. Its just a beautiful machine.
TheJCJexe 5 months ago 7
@TheJCJexe Me - F-22 anyday.
F22raptor46 2 weeks ago
Beautiful airplane.
MisterNail 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The only fucking thing shouting in my head while watching this was: "Black Eagle reporting..." ^^
WhiteKestrell 5 months ago
Comment removed
WhiteKestrell 5 months ago
How does the wing system work?
thevindicaresbrother 6 months ago
is it stealth?
toreto5000 6 months ago
@toreto5000 Иди на х*й ваш стелс нервно курит в сторонке!
estebanvix 2 months ago
wish they make a 1/48 and 1/32 plastic model of this
jaja1818 6 months ago
@ascendead1 Well stated!
TheRussianpower123 7 months ago
russian design, is so ass backwards
ToAstYNaChO 7 months ago
Comment removed
ironian 6 months ago
@ToAstYNaChO
Yup, specially since the Su-47 was based on the Grumman X-29, a very AMERICAN aircraft. American design is so ass backwards too.
ironian 6 months ago
@ironian Based on...not copied, russians put their own very Different spin on everything, so do we, look at the M60, based on the MG-42, but looks and performs nothing like it
ToAstYNaChO 6 months ago
Damn! Do all Russian jet fighters do the cobra? Amazing!
Tigadee00 8 months ago
@Tigadee00 In Soviet Russia, Cobra do jet fighters.
I had to post that ^^
WhiteKestrell 5 months ago
The starting frames, I thought I got tricked and this was an RC video...then I saw the guy inside.
Soger91 8 months ago
so sad it got cancelled, it looks way cooler than the PAK-FA, hopefully they decide to remake it.
RockRebel1998 8 months ago
China is the coveted Russia military technology. Available they should be! That way, China to develop more high-tech? Of these, outrun Russia no doubt. It's from China more than Russia at the same time absorbing Western technology.
keiya1955 8 months ago
@keiya1955 Funny,.
i Chuckled tee hee.
what movie did you see?
Dreadnought942 8 months ago
i played with this fighter in HWAX
trymine2 8 months ago
Su-35BM - Russia: The 30 year old Su-27 airframe is still going strong with its great maneuverability, durability ,and adaptability. It also has great BVR capability but not on par with western designs like the F-22, Eurofighter, and Rafale. It has the largest RCS in this category making it highly visible to radars.
kotonizna 8 months ago
Another rip off of an American design. How long til we see a Russian Raptor design?
No, I'm not American!
HarryMuffUk 8 months ago
Never mind. I just saw the Sukhoi T50... Sigh...
HarryMuffUk 8 months ago
@HarryMuffUk Imbeicle this is pure Russian airplane.... wtf is F22?? 100 million dollar shit can. There is nothing even remotely close to Su47 in US inventory. Plus MiG1.44 and Su47 were here lOOOOONG before F22 ever existed, so if anything F22 designers copied SU47 berkut.
Ouija121085 8 months ago
@Ouija121085 Thanks for playing dipshit. Now go and Google Grumman X29 and check the date of the first flight... 1984! They got bored with it a long time ago but the Russians just can't stop copying American designs.
Class dismissed!
HarryMuffUk 8 months ago
@HarryMuffUk bahahahha ure a brit ahahah what has your country made in the past 50 years except a double decker bus? fuck you russian aero-space engineering is the world class everyone knows that even americans. While for your political propaganda bullshit go watch more hollywood movies maybe you come with some original comedy...
Ouija121085 8 months ago
@HarryMuffUk and for x29 cowboys could not make it work thats why they ditched it was too complicated.... plus they couldnt even make a jump-jet on F35 which they bought plans from YAK141. So really everyone knows that russian fighter jets/bombers are best in the world.
Ouija121085 8 months ago
@Ouija121085
You see, Americans played with that technology long long time ago. They realized something though, if the flight computer fails, the inherently unstable airplane will rip apart in air.
Secondly, who the fuck needs ever more maneuverable airplanes 50-60 years AFTER the WW II?????
Russian engineers are playing too many dog fight video games.
napornik 8 months ago
@napornik
Seeing as how the USA keeps starting wars, it is not a bad idea to be ready just in case.
Idiot.
nicf17 8 months ago
@napornik Ok you're exaggerating it a bit. It won't rip apart, would it? It'll just become hyper hard too fly maybe, which leads us to the next feature: The Ejectable Seat. Marvelous invention allowing you to go sightseeing with your parachute whilst 'your' multi-million dollar plane flies straight (or maybe not-so-straight with that unstable plane) into a mountain. Also, maneuverability does comes in handy while evading missiles, too. Not just in dog fights ;)
WhiteKestrell 5 months ago
@napornik It doesn't rip apart because it's unstable, it falls out of the sky because it's unstabel. And they make important systems like that overly redundant in case something goes wrong.
atjnAdfhhjea 5 months ago
@HarryMuffUk this prototype was from 1970's shit head. If it werent for captured nazis you would stil lbe flying byplanes so shut the fuck up. u Stole everythin of nazis.
Ouija121085 3 months ago
me gusta el su 47 .....pero del que estoy fascinado es del su 35
luveto 8 months ago
An RAF TYHPOON would knock that toy out of the sky!!
OperationFoxley19441 9 months ago
the only poeple still fighting america vs russia is my grandpa. Were on opposite sides of the world and unless Russia tries to turn the middle east into west russia then i dont see a problem worth fighting over. Look at me my country has a cool airplane that i had no part in creating. Get 5 of each ready to go with remote controls to a fighter sim and have the world best pilots duke it out over the skies of Canada
paintballgundown8 9 months ago
RUSSIA is the best in world
ArturRUS1265i 9 months ago
su 47 was built as a raptor killer (f 22), this now makes it obsolete with the raptor;s demise.
srtingfellow 9 months ago
@srtingfellow demise? hahahaha
AdverbAdjective 8 months ago
Change the nose a little and you will have a Klingon "Bird of Prey" I like this plane. It looks cool!
Landotter1 9 months ago
What is to be the most stupid, immoral people in the world?
I mean I will bring you ... Americans
CanisDirus8 10 months ago
The average American couldn't give 2 shits about Russia...they probably couldn't even show it to you on a map. Not to mention they believe our American military is far superior by several decades to anyone else and want to dismantle it. Russia is a has been nation that is full thyroid cancer from Chernobyl and is a hodge podge of disorganized races. The average age of a man in Russia is 59 in America...76. How does it feel to know you will be dead before 60?
cchanderson 10 months ago
@cchanderson How does it feel to have nigger for president ?
CrniGuja 10 months ago
@CrniGuja A wee bit better than having an ex-spook who is no longer president and wants to turn it back into a totalitarian form of government make all the decisions... ;-]
garzac7815 9 months ago
@cchanderson " Russia is a has been nation that is full thyroid cancer from Chernobyl " ??? Do you even know where Chernobyl is? What kind of ignorant comment is this anyway? Please tell me that you aren't one who thinks that the Soviet Union was Russia... What most Americans don't realize about Russia is that they are extremely tough and resilliant people and can withstand almost anything thrown at them. They are doing just fine by themselves. They need no one to survive just fine.
Landotter1 9 months ago
@Landotter1 yeah much of the contaminated area is indeed over Russian soil Turbo..its from the phenomena called wind.
cchanderson 9 months ago
@cchanderson No shit? So exactly what region is it that must cover such a vast area?
Landotter1 9 months ago
Flying coffin
GODKHaaaaaaN 10 months ago
Firefox ... LOOKS cool ... but would be easy prey for the Raptor.
TonyN737 10 months ago
@TonyN737 you don't know, really. no one does.
SNUGGIPWNSLOL 10 months ago
@SNUGGIPWNSLOL If one shows up on radar and the other one doesn't, then the outcome is predetermined.
TonyN737 10 months ago
@TonyN737 Yes it is, but how do you know? I hihgly doubt that neither the American or Russian government give out all the details regarding their respective militaries.
SNUGGIPWNSLOL 10 months ago
@SNUGGIPWNSLOL Because the shape of the plane doesn't deflect radar ... easy Raptor food.
TonyN737 10 months ago
what is the advantage with the switched directional wings?
LiebeFurVolk 10 months ago
@LiebeFurVolk Read the "forward-swept wing" Article @wiki. The planes are basically flying labs.
ATAS987654321 10 months ago
@LiebeFurVolk *Forward Swept Wings* are supposed to increase maneuverability. The Germans came up with the idea before WW2. The US tested the idea in the 80s with the X-29 but it never became an fighter. But we DID keep the idea of *Thrust Vectoring Nozzles* from the X-29, you can see a different version of them on the F-22. TVNs are better than FSWs (and also *Forward Wing Canards* (which reflect way too much radar).
TonyN737 10 months ago
I personally think that is the ugliest plane ever. But it is honestly a great piece of work, although it is very large in size.
skateslick58 11 months ago
I've seen quite a few videos of this aircraft, but I've never seen it do anything amazing. I know the forward swept wing concept in itself is an amazing feat, but this aircraft can do nothing more than most single engine aircraft. That's why it was so short lived. I think this aircraft was built for moral purposes more so than anything else. The composites used on the space shuttle were far more advanced the ones used on this aircraft. I just don't see the point. Nice to look at though.
AeroSharkTech 11 months ago
I invented this wing modell when I was 6 years old. I assembled plastic aircraft models and cemented the wings backwards. My older brother called me an idiot. But was I really....?
SirRetku 11 months ago 42
@SirRetku in that case not...
knacks21 11 months ago
@SirRetku - Well if you are talking about it on a youtube message board instead of some science journal.. you most probably are... :)
strangerindanger 11 months ago
@SirRetku possibly, the Germans has SFW during WW2. Little known fact
Allanvh5150 8 months ago
@SirRetku no... your brother is an idiot. Berkut has superior handleing then any fighter in the world due to the inverted wings which allows it to manuver and cut thru the air more efficiently then conventional wing.
Ouija121085 8 months ago
@SirRetku, .....really idiot! You didnt pattent it!
rtogog 8 months ago
@SirRetku, .....really idiot! You didn't patten it!
rtogog 8 months ago
@SirRetku yes
eloidor 8 months ago
@SirRetku There's some instability in this type of wing
Marcuzzorox 4 months ago
@Marcuzzorox Isn't that the point for extra agility? Kinda what the Euro typhoon was aiming for?
LiamRiordan 4 months ago
@LiamRiordan I don't know the answer for your question.
Marcuzzorox 4 months ago
interesting equipment...
while so far it's a tech demonstrator only, i wonder if it well ever get operational and how good it will be.
as long as it doesn't go to the wrong hands, goodluck
nirharpaz1 11 months ago
Russians, you are the best, stop talking, show it baby, let me se what Americans have, fuck all, if there are not israelis to hel them , they will stll use pistol, John Wayn even now. Bravo Russians, I love you all
mmcompjhb 11 months ago
I love it, I want two of them. One for me and one for my co-worker just to make it to work on time and in style.
Zacarius666 11 months ago
Can I get one of these for Christmas please? lol
nova2384 11 months ago
fucking russian liars. they say this wing is unique and only russians have it now. while i have a book that's nearly 30 years old where it depicts an american plane with the same wing. russians are good for nothing.
sanddune1981 1 year ago
это лучший самолет
BOXER734 1 year ago
SU-47 is one of the coolest looking planes to fly. Sadly it has all those stabilizers and odd shaped wings because it can barely stay in the air itself. Still looks cool when it fly's! @Aminodaff China can kick NATOs ass if America let it. Dont forget China just recently started publicly showing its stealth fighter over 10 years after America publicly showed it.
MachetePanda 1 year ago
@MachetePanda *Finish this Sentence* ... Stealth Technology was invented by (Country).......
massivesovietunion 1 year ago
@massivesovietunion Germany did in WWII with the creation of the Ho IX V2. You could have just googled that. :p
MachetePanda 1 year ago
@MachetePanda I don't think so .... Russia was the first country to come up with Stealth Techonology
massivesovietunion 1 year ago
@massivesovietunion before WWII? I think your in denial! :p
MachetePanda 1 year ago
@MachetePanda noooooo .... I think you havn' t done ur research :P
massivesovietunion 1 year ago
@massivesovietunion I think thats what you want to think. Do your homework, knows your history and accept it, snap out of the denial.
MachetePanda 1 year ago
@MachetePanda No ... That is WHAT YOU want to Think .... watch?v=VO6IlNoP1Ng&feature=related ....
massivesovietunion 11 months ago
Hot like fire...
eblgraphics 1 year ago
Before I was filled with the perspective of both of the Communist and American side of both countries I have always like the Sukoih 47. But the F-22 Raptor is the best for now.
Dtt4 1 year ago
soooo sexy
kschucky 1 year ago
Why hasn't this been mass produced yet? Did it fail?
makemap 1 year ago
@makemap it was a test plane but sukhoi is now thinking about selling it as a fully operational plane
tadanorm 1 year ago
@makemap
russia lacks of money.....but plane is perfect....
Aminodaff 1 year ago
зато ф-22 некто не перегонит - скажет кто-то) он убегает быстрее всех)
когда говорят о лучшем самолете, нужно учитывать разные характеристики.
даже по вооружению не часто увидишь (у американцов) ракеты дешевле 800.000-1.000.000, бой может и выиграют, но на войну не напасешься)
LordDesAbsterdens 1 year ago
мой родственник из Америки сделали это /watch?v=N7ZM6gjwAmw
marshalbuff 1 year ago
Too much Vodka for the Sukhoi design team when they put the wings on back to front?
tetramoo 1 year ago 2
@tetramoo So as Sham pin is for the design team of F-35, makers of the aircraft which would be least in cost & is now a white elephant for the U.S government..............
SuperShehreyar 1 year ago
the guy who flies the su47 is the luckiest bastard in the world
motorgame 1 year ago 49
@motorgame no the guys that fly for U.S.A.F are
chanz336 7 months ago
cirk i tolka, v boyu nikokova tolka
Altvald 1 year ago
spooky plane ... and deadly aircraft
i give thumb for this vid
shatanize 1 year ago
It's my understanding that the design is actually inherently unstable, according to both pilots and engineers, and that the added maneuverability is offset by this. The only reason it's flyable is because of computer aided control, or as most of you probably already know, what is also known as "fly by wire". Of course I can't think of one modern jet that doesn't have that kind of system.
siral000 1 year ago
sexy as hell. raptor is child's game .
stacryl 1 year ago
@stacryl You do realize that the raptor is faster, far more agile, and slightly less stealth... right? Not to mention it's payload is 30% larger and more fuel efficient. (when at same weight)
The raptor is in an entirely different class of aircraft. It can also be piloted remotely. This means the maneuvers it could use without a person inside would destroy a su 47.
LuNaTeCh66 1 year ago
@LuNaTeCh66 Pretty queer rely on remote control of Raptor while its systems showed critical failure each 2 hours of flight.
BorshCaen 1 year ago
@LuNaTeCh66
raptor has never met su-47 berkut...so shut da fck up...
Aminodaff 1 year ago
@Aminodaff And it never will.Raptor has stealth,su 47 does not.
916fanatic1 1 year ago
Comment removed
tHaH4x0r 1 year ago
@916fanatic1
the su47 does, do some research...
tHaH4x0r 1 year ago
Sad thing this jet probably wont go into production.
theaircraftgeek12 1 year ago
I know as an American we are at odds with Russia, but as in chess you have to respect your adversary, and you can't get cocky lest you lose. Their aircraft are pretty awesome.
Indy1489 1 year ago
@Indy1489 I think they're more practical which is better than awesome, one of these days someone will make jammers good enough to make radar useless anyways to making aircraft stealthy by their physical design to me is pointless. Speed and mobility will be the future maybe not the near future but will be the future none the less.
Luminahawke 1 year ago
That plane just screams "I'm a killer, and I look good while doing it!"
LiamRiordan 1 year ago
este ho zacat vyrabat....
jarry757 1 year ago
@DaiwaYamato88 yep, agility. before thrust vectoring was invented, this was the clearest path to better maneuverability - problem is they're highly unstable, moreso if they sustain damage to the wing, and given its meant to be a combat plane, its generally passed over for a more combat capable design.
amayami 1 year ago
F-22 cld run show on it anyday
isaidbiggercham 1 year ago
wth?!?!'
these wings are the strangest i have ever seen
milanTHErocker 1 year ago
@milanTHErocker the Germans were making planes with forward swept wings in the 40s
MrCountrycuz 1 year ago
@MrCountrycuz rly? O.o
milanTHErocker 1 year ago
@milanTHErocker
it is a test plane.... definetely not ordinary plane...
Aminodaff 1 year ago
@DaiwaYamato88 I think it helps in reducing power on high speeds - the plane is using less cerozine. But I cant be sure in that, I am not quite an avionics expert. :D
marcus10 1 year ago
@DaiwaYamato88 yes :] makes for tighter turns and reduces drag, i think xD
hiimslow 1 year ago
Menacing looking. I'd love it.
ES350ES350 1 year ago
the best looking fighter jet i have ever seen.. this ones my favorite!! would love to see it as a primary fighter .. it also looks unique too.. thumbs up and nice job russia! from a Canadian Sri Lankan!
Solja2010 1 year ago
This reminds me of the red crane when she comes down ever so gentle and graceful.
Peace9821 1 year ago
All made in Russia is bad..
TheAndyTh 1 year ago
It really has that "dont mess with me" look.
marcus10 1 year ago
For me, Russian aircrafts are the best, and I believe they can do more.
batbayar1001 1 year ago
а толку с малого количества грустно что Россия и Украина создают хорошие оружие но не в состоянии вооружать им своих солдат
MadmanSinger 1 year ago 19
@MadmanSinger зато скок могут на заказ сделать всяким корейцам,индусам,пакистанцам,иранцам--это же все в бюджет пойдет
TheBuffaloeye 1 year ago
@MadmanSinger Скорее не хотят и мешают вооружать!
Hag3upaTeJIb 10 months ago
@jospehporta well i agree wid u abt da 4ward swept wing tech.. nasa nd da nazis did try it out.. bt they cudn't mk it operational cos of stabilitty issues nd also cos of the shearing force prblms.. bt these russians did it,, as far as da steakth issue goes,, it indeed incorporates stealth.... it is built of composite materials meant to absorb nd deflect radar...
kairomama123 1 year ago
the su-47 'berkut' or golden eagle has been designed as a complete stealth plane... u can see that it does not have external hardpoints which suggests an internal weapons bay.. moreover, it is said that it also incorporates thrust vectoring technology and futuristic radar systems... if all these are true and if its radical forward swept wing design helps in superior maneuverability then.. maybe this is the Russian answer for the F-22 and the F-35 JSF....
kairomama123 1 year ago
@kairomama123 lol radical, NASA had a jet like this in the 1984, old tech and America did it first, well the Nazi's actually, but you get the point. Nothing stealth about it unless you think being painted black gives it stealth. Superior maneuverability doesn't do shit against advance AAM's, it'll be blown out of the sky as though it were standing still.
Jospehporta 1 year ago
Russia makes nice planes but theyre equal to a F-15 or F-18..Also, Russia is still trying to play catch up to the U.S. in Avionics & stealth capabilities..
opguy001 1 year ago
@opguy001 Probably Mig-29 is equal to those fighters today, but it's a 20 yr old jet. Today Russia has Mig-35 which can kill pretty much anything. :>
Convict147 1 year ago
@opguy001 Maybe in american medias. In reality those planes flew over american carriers many times, on a huge surprice of american crew members.
marcus10 1 year ago
@marcus10 No the Russians are currently well behind in Avionics and stealth technology, I could give you the prove but if you reply bring yours cause that will save me time.
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago
@TheMilitaryTactics The "stealth tactics" is not everything in warfare. But if you think you have the proof - speak up.
marcus10 1 year ago
@marcus10 no I never said "stealth tactics" I said "stealth technology" and "avionics" and so because they are a very important role to play both of these technology's like what happened in 1991 at the time the Iraq had the 4th largest army, had the most integrated areal defence system of the time, within 100 of the attack they lost there defence and capability to fight back in almost every way. now if that's not prove that stealth and "stealth tactics" work...
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago
@TheMilitaryTactics Yes, but Russian airforce disconnected all "cells" of georgian airial defence which were made on NATO standards just few years ago.
marcus10 1 year ago
@marcus10 yeah that is NATO standards not US standards or UK standards, also the SU-30MKI had equal ratio's to the F-15D (1:1) in red flag, and the Russians were saying that it was twice as better before that.
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago
@TheMilitaryTactics Su30 were not used in conflict. Only 3 Su25 were shot down by so-called friendly fire.
marcus10 1 year ago
@marcus10 Yes they were not but red flag is a routine training week for a simulated war in the USA India put money in one year and sent there people there to be trained in more detail.
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago
@TheMilitaryTactics War simulation made by US army? And you take that for correct force value... Please, those things are made only for propaganda activities (for all those simulations which results were showed to public).
marcus10 1 year ago
@marcus10 actually the Indians wanted to say the results not the US.
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago
@TheMilitaryTactics It doesnt change the point - simulations which had only one manufacturer involved (US) cant be objective.
marcus10 1 year ago
@marcus10 it was not just them the US it is based in the US, in fact it is US, UK, France, India, Germany, Turkey, and allot lot more that do use it and have an equal opinion on what is trained to the pilots at the different simulation's conducted to be as realistic of meeting enemy planes as can be.
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago
@TheMilitaryTactics And all are NATO members exept India. What a coincidance...
marcus10 1 year ago
@marcus10 well the list countrys that have gone are US, UK, France, Germany,Japan,Italy,Canada,Australia,South Korea,Spain,India,Brazil, Netherlands,Belgium,Sweden,Denmark,Norway,Portugal,Greece,New Zealand,Singapore,Chile,Israel,Turkey,Saudia Arabia,United Arab Emirates, Venezuela, and Pakistan. so yeah about half are in NATO and that isn't to surprising as it's a military treaty, and it's not like what comes out of Russia and China are going to be more neutral.
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago
@TheMilitaryTactics I didnt said that what comes from Russia and China would be more neutral, it is same propaganda bulls**t. I spoked about events in reality which are only one which could be called on.
marcus10 1 year ago
@marcus10 yes you have made a good point.
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago
@TheMilitaryTactics Thats all I am saying. The point is - Russians really have really good planes. And that means really, really good ones.
marcus10 1 year ago
@marcus10 Yeah we do have pretty good planes.
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago
@TheMilitaryTactics Well of course, nobody cant deny that.
marcus10 1 year ago
@marcus10 No one in there right mind anyhow though.
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago
@marcus10
Chine can kick NATO's fat ass....
Aminodaff 1 year ago
GO RUSSIA. THAT IS AN AWSOME PLANE. If oyu look on the design you can tell teh airodinamic technology put into the plane...russian style!!!!!
russialand1 1 year ago
Guy being interviewed: va du come shres men i mya stluchi vas mors cu ya bra muschtichin.
Right on brother!!!!
77PensFan 1 year ago
I prefer US aviation from the tech and battle proven performance, but the Russians make such sexy airplanes, and their powerplants have a very high rep amongst the aviation community for their raw power
JavierCR25 1 year ago
fuck usa from alabnia
T88Toni 1 year ago
@T88Toni Albania StrOng !!!!!ooooo!!!!oo
neophyte777 1 year ago
"One of best Aircraft in the world, Right next to Su-37 and Mig-35" well thats where your wrong, what about the american f-22, or are you to ignorant to know about it?
RacersMoment 1 year ago
@RacersMoment dude, shut the fuck up, i can already tell your so lost when it comes to anything.
TheDoctorV2point0 1 year ago
@TheDoctorV2point0 you must be fucking stupid, the f-22 raptor can out maneuver the su-47 any day! proven fact dumb ass! next time do ur research before you run your fucking mouth
RacersMoment 1 year ago
@RacersMoment stupid fuck, i obviously wasnt talking about that. i meant it as in, because they dont mention the f22, you call them ignorant. asshole.
TheDoctorV2point0 1 year ago
@TheDoctorV2point0 it is ignorant to list other jets that arnt even as good as the f22, STUPID FUCK!
RacersMoment 1 year ago
@RacersMoment su37 and mig 35 are very good planes, you simply think that because the f22 is better it makes them not worth a shit. they arent ignorant, by your standards they might as well go back and name off every fukin plane that was good for its time. which makes you a dumbass.
TheDoctorV2point0 1 year ago
@RacersMoment also, f22 is not a russian plane. ignorant fuck.
TheDoctorV2point0 1 year ago
@TheDoctorV2point0 ?!?!? im ignorant, im american, the f22 is american, your the ignorant fuck, im saying america is better!!!!
RacersMoment 1 year ago
@RacersMoment holy shit you are retarded. first you call them ignorant for not naming an american plane, then you call me ignorant for calling you ignorant BECAUSE YOU ARE IGNORANT. get off the internet and read a fuking book.
TheDoctorV2point0 1 year ago
all of you went on about the ak-47, i agree that is a good item, because it has few moving parts. A modern fighter aircraft, like a car has a lot of moving parts. If you can not get a simple car right during mass production do you really think you can get some hing as complex as a fighter right during mass production? No that is why Russian aircraft are near handmade, which makes maintenance and repair a nightmare. No interchangeability.
masluxx 1 year ago
I bet it's like any other russian military piece of equipment: looks cool but is garbage in real combat
normalais 1 year ago
@normalais you ever been in a russian combat anything? most likley no, have you ever been in combat period my bet no. So how can you come up with that opinion?
he said she said shit? T.V or both? FYI Russian has not lost a War in Hundreds of years Ghangis Khan Mongolian hords ( almost but no) Napolian came close not close enough, The Turks Attomon empire Ran, WWI, Almost, WWII very close still beat there ass, Afgan we withdrew hopefully US will too so explain our shiity weaopns ienstien???
VBY1981 1 year ago